Please standby. Good day and welcome to the Twin Disc Incorporated Fiscal Third Quarter 2017 Investor Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Stan Berger of SM Berger. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Jessica. On behalf of the management of Twin Disc, we’re extremely pleased that you have taken the time to participate in our call, and thank you for joining us to discuss the company’s fiscal 2017 third quarter and nine months financial results and business outlook. Before I introduce management, I would like to remind everyone that certain statements made during the course of this conference call, especially those that state management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future are forward-looking statements. It is important to remember that the company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, copies of which may be obtained by contacting either the company or the SEC. By now, you should have received a copy of the news release which was issued this morning before the market opened. If you have not received a copy, please call Annette Mianecki at 262-638-4000 and she will send the copy to you. Hosting the call today are John Batten, Twin Disc President and Chief Executive Officer; and Jeff Knutson, the company’s Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. At this time, I will turn the call over to John Batten. John?

Thank you, Stan and good morning everyone. Welcome to our fiscal 2017 third quarter call. As usual, we will begin with a short summary statement and then Jeff and I will be happy to take your question. Before Jeff goes over the third quarter results, I'd just like to take a few moments to go over some of the key takeaways from the third quarter and year-to-date results. As other industrial companies have been reporting our fiscal 2017 third quarter of the first calendar quarter of 2017 is our first quarter over quarter improvement and sometime to both shipment and incoming orders. The main drivers are in increase demand for oil field power transmission. Our aftermarket parts business across the entire spectrum of our product and a nice increase in orders for our global petrol boats projects. While the global offshore market remained weak with many fast supply vessels and offshore supply vessels taken out of service, we didn’t see some great spots with petrol boats in Asia, fishing vessels in the Canadian Maritimes and the steady in land and work both market in North America and Europe. Our industrial markets saw some slight softness in the quarter for unit, but a strong demand for aftermarket part. Jeff will cover the goodwill impairment which relates more to our domestic market not showing accelerated forward market growth. As I mentioned at the beginning, the first we have demand in three years from North America for oil and gas transmission led the way in the quarter. The amount of useable excess capacity in North America maybe at a historic low, and while we are not anticipating the huge bounce we saw in 2009 to 2011, constant usage should equate to a steadier demand going forward. A lot of the gross margin improvement, we saw could be attributed to increase sale and we have to give credit to our operations group, we have taken a significant amount of cost out of the operation, reorganized and implemented new lean initiative both in the office and on a shop floor to keep us on an improved performance track. After our restructuring and early retirement two years ago, we have been running lean, no pun intended, in certain parts of the organization, especially operations. Our new hires with some very valuable outside experience have begun to help us move forward with these new lean initiatives. Jeff will have more of the margin detail, but we will continue to expand this effort throughout our operations to keep us better prepared for all parts of the cycle not just the downturn. We set a target to be profitable at 200 million, with a smaller share of that being oil and gas and we believe we are ahead of that target. With that I’ll turn it over to Jeff for some comments on the financials.

Thanks John and good morning everyone. I’ll run through the numbers in little more detail. Sales for the third fiscal quarter of 45.1 million were up 3.7 million or approximately 9% from the prior year third quarter and 11.4 million or nearly 34% sequentially. Third quarter sales represented the highest quarterly sales levels since fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. As John mentioned the primarily driver for improved revenue in the quarter was the initial shipments of oil and gas units into North America along with improved North American aftermarket demand which was also led by oilfield activity. Year to date sales are down 9 million or 7% below prior year levels. The year-over-year decline is largely due to reduced activity in the Asian market or the company's commercial marine products, delayed shipment due to a supplier transition issue we've mentioned on previous calls and general softness in the industrial market. FX has small positive impact on sales to the first three quarters compared to the prior year of approximately 600,000. Despite the 9 million declines in sales gross profit is actually ahead of last year by 2 million through three quarter, our gross margin percent for the third quarter improved by 630 basis points to 29.5% compared to 23.2 in the prior year third quarter. For the three quarters ended March our margin has improved by 360 basis points to 27.4 compared to 23.8% for the prior year. The positive result is reflective of the company's aggressive cost reduction initiatives over the past several quarters in response to difficult market conditions in many of our end markets along with a favorable margin impact of the increased oil and gas and aftermarket shipment to the fiscal third quarter. Spending on marketing, engineering and administrative costs for the first three quarters of…

Thanks Jeff. And I’ll spend a quick moment on the outlook. Certainly the 31% improvement in the backlog up to almost 50 million gives us some wind in our sails. As I mentioned earlier oil and gas global petrol boat projects and aftermarket were the key drivers in improving that backlog. It's hard to predict the timing of any new oil and gas orders, so there is a chance that the backlog could fluctuate going forward. But we believe that we will bouncing around at a level that is certainly higher than in the recent past. If our recent order trends continue, we feel confident that only offshore oil and gas faces potential further negative headwinds in the coming quarters and that we will see profitable quarters in the very near future. That concludes our prepared remarks. And now Jeff and I’ll be happy to take your question. Jessica, please open the line for questions.

Absolutely. [Operator Instruction] And we go to Wojs Tim from Baird.

Just a question on your thoughts about the oil and gas market. Obviously, you have that large order, so can you remind us that the timing of shipping those units, where does it last till? And then based on your comments, can we assume that maybe that the order trends in oil and gas have not yet been that much broad base relative to [Multiple Speakers]?

Yes, Wojs, we receive the order kind of in the middle of the third quarter and we got some units out in the third quarter, but most of that shipment of that 100 is throughout the fourth quarter and to the first quarter of fiscal '18. We have had other orders, so that order of 100 wasn’t the only one, but yes, as the bulk of what's in the backlog right now is going to ship in the fourth quarter and first quarter of next fiscal year. I would say that the order rates for the entire industry, certainly hasn’t peaked, I would say it's just begun, and having travelled around the oil patch in the last few months. And to echo my comments from earlier, I do think that the useable excess inventory is at a historic -- at a very recent historic low. So even with constant production the assets need to be overhauled or replaced. And that's widespread.

So based on kind of like your conversation with the customers, it’s reasonable to expect that order come in maybe on a more steady basis, you just maybe haven't quite seen it at this point yet?

Correct. I don’t expect just the pop that we saw back in calendar 2009, '10 and '11. But I do see that there will be increased orders. Predicting the timing of it is hard and that's why I think that, if we don’t get anything this quarter our backlog easily could go down a little bit only to go back up at the end of the first quarter, but I do think that we're going to be certainly what's in the average backlog for the prior two or three quarters, that level's going up. Definitely an increase in parts and in units and oil and gas going forward.

Understood, okay. And then switching over to your comments about the strength in the aftermarket businesses, do you think that is kind of an early sign that maybe the OEE side of the business can improve too in some of the non-oil and gas business or how are you thinking about this capital market.

Historically, an increase in aftermarket has always been a prelude to new unit order and markets recovering. We would hope that this would be the same no different than any other cycle. It's just that a lot of the forward market activity particularly the industrial markets it's just not as clear, you don’t get as many verbal commitments or forecasts from OEM customers and our distributors not getting the same type of forecasts in their customers so. But the aftermarket activity certainly makes us all feel better about the upcoming forward market activity.

Right. And then on the marine business you mentioned strength in the petrol boats, what about the other marine businesses that you have, commercial marine and things of that nature?

When we think about work boat, inland waterway, harbors, that's been good. It's been you know -- it hasn't been on fire like the recent oil and gas to the aftermarket with nice increases, but it's been steady. On the concerning market where we see a lot of excess capacity really is an offshore area. So the crew boats down on the Gulf Coast, crew boats in Asia, the offshore supply vessels, there is just right now a big excess capacity there. So if there's one, I would say, market that can as I mentioned continues to concern us for this calendar market, is that offshore market.

And then on the 2.4 million of savings. Have you started realizing that already or is that something that expects to come through in next year.

Yes, it's hard to give you a good feel for exactly how much we’ve realized, but yes we have started realizing those savings. You know we've had action sort of on an ongoing basis over the last six quarters and certainly saw the spending this year over the three quarters we've already had savings from. The actions taken in the first two quarters, it's an immediate impact.

Alright, that makes sense. Great, thanks for your time and congrats on the improve the backlog.

And we'll now go to Walter Liptak from Seaport Global.

Just follow on from the last question about the cost savings and you made a comment that the 200 million profitable that you had a target, I wonder how you like us to look at kind of your breakeven level now and then as you get beyond that 200 million mark and what kind of operating leverage are you thinking about going forward?

Yes, it's Jeff. We feel like going into this downturn, we wanted to be profitable at 200 million, I think as John said we are pretty confident, obviously it depends on mix and how much aftermarket in oil and gas makes up of that volume. But I think we are pretty confident at even at a 190 million that we're at that breakeven level, given a reasonable mix. And along with that the reductions that we've put in place, the structure change that we have made, the operating efficacies that have been implemented over the last year and half, I think will certainly create some favorable offering leverage coming out. We look at sort of our standards target is to convert that 40% as we increase volume, that we're dropping around 40% to the operating margin line. So that’s kind of our target given again that's a reasonable mix.

Okay. So that 40%, is that target kind of like over a long-term period, where you would see better leverage early on in the recovery, or is that kind of the recovering operating leverage you think you'll get?

Yes, and again it's going to depend a lot on mix, but I think 40% is kind of a standard at any point in the cycle base upon what we've done with cost at this point.

Okay fair enough. And I wonder if you could talk about a little bit about the backlog and the increase sequentially, looks like about 17 million or so of backlog improvement. How much of that is the oil and gas as a percentage and maybe how much is industrial mine?

Seeing at the backlog, you can pick the sequential quarter just before or the one a year ago, the backlog for oil and gas would have been zero. So by far the biggest movement in dollars and percentage is going to be the oil and gas, when you stick in 100 units. But that’s certainly not everything and really, I mean there is a noticeable increase in aftermarket in the petrol boat products. Though it alone would have been is a story, just the offshore oil and gas, I mean that’s off shore -- pressure pumping transmission, obviously stole the dollar amount in the percentage because it was coming from zero.

And the -- how are you feeling about the pricing of the product I guess as it gets to the mix that you brought up just -- how we should think about the pricing of what's in backlog, whether they drove competitive orders to take in, I mean you have talked in the past about the competitiveness with any 500, are you able to get a captive customer base with that product?

It's competitive, certainly it's more competitive than it was, but it's still the mix of price, quality and availability and we feel we compete very well on all of them but we're very happy that we've made some decisions two years ago going into the downturn to keep some inventory to be able to react. And so that -- all three are still very important. But it’s not -- I'd be lying if I said it wasn't more competitive now, just given that it's been a barren desert for new units for over two years.

Right, everyone wants to sell something. Okay, great and then you know you kind of talked about or alluded to the diversity of the oil and gas market that there may be more bids out there and I wonder if there's a way of quantifying that? Like if you look at it three or six months ago, the quote activity versus now, you know are you seeing more customers that are active in the market and you know.

It's -- I don't, I mean I would have given everything that I’d seen, heard, witnessed and read, I would have predicted the orders that we got, that we would have gotten them sooner. And so, I still think and I know a lot of other people, our competitors I believe see this as well as that you know the equipment has been used and used hard. And it needs overhaul and in many cases, it needs replacement. So you know if they're out on a site and something happens where you need to service the rig, does not necessarily a swing unit, there's not a rig there available to come in. So I just think in general everyone is going to see an increase in demand it’s just, I'm continually wrong when I think device sale, when I think it’s going to be, because I think it should be sooner. But it’s nice to see that we've gotten orders from multiple customers, I know that there are other customers out there and I'm sure our competitors are going to get some orders. So I do see -- I think it’s the start of an improving trend. I just think everyone is still very, very cautious about outlaying cash in I would say uncertain macroeconomic times and you're still dealing with OPEC who, you never know what they're going to do so. But I don't think whether it’s $50 a barrel or $60 a barrel, it really doesn't matter because the assets need to be replaced.

Okay, alright great, well thank you very much.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll now go to Brian Anheimer from Gabelli & Company.

Just to hang on to your last statement there, you know you mentioned you're not expecting uptick like we saw in 2009 to 2011 and certainly we'd agree that your conversations with your customers about breakeven then versus breakeven now, you mentioned $50 to $60 oil really doesn't matter. When you're talking to your customers who really need this equipment, what do they think they're all in cost to get their oil out of the ground is right now?

Brian, I wish -- I wish I could answer -- I have probably a couple more that one on one conversions with operators, then some, but not -- it's hard -- it is different for every company. Certainly when you are running with equipment that is fully depreciated and you are not doing a lot on expense to maintain it. It's going to be a lot lower than if you place it with new equipment. But I would say that the overall efficiency on how they are doing it, staying at sites longer, doing longer laterals, it's down significantly. It's hard for me say that there is a general average, but I would -- I think that most people are making money at $50 a barrel.

Okay. So and the reason of expectation that we stay around these levels that there is no reason why --.

Yes.

What you are saying is it should continue.

Yes.

[Multiple Speakers].

Correct, that there, more equipment needs to be -- have major overhauls or replaced, yes.

And it appears, there are no further questions. I’ll turn the conference back over to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Jessica. And thank you for joining our conference call today. We appreciate your continuing interest in Twin Disc and hope that we have answered all of your questions, if not, please feel free to call Jeff or myself. And we look forward to speaking with you again in August following the close of our 2017 fourth quarter and yearend. Jessica, now I’ll turn the call back to you.

This does conclude our presentation for today. Thank you for your participation.