Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Twin Disc Incorporated 2008 fourth quarter financial results conference call. During today’s presentation all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation the conference will be opened for questions. (Operator instructions) As a reminder this conference is being recorded today, Tuesday, July 29th, 2008. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Stan Berger, please go ahead, sir.

On behalf of the management of Twin Disc, we are extremely pleased that you have taken the time to participate in our call and thank you for joining us to discuss the company's fiscal 2008 fourth quarter financial results and business outlook. Before I introduce management, I would like to remind everyone that certain statements made during the course of this conference call, especially those that state management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future, are forward-looking statements. It is important to remember that the company's actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, copies of which may be obtained by contacting either the company or the SEC. By now you should have received a copy of the news release, which was issued this morning before the market opened. If you have not received a copy, please call us at 262-638-4000 and we will send you a copy. Hosting the call today are Michael Batten, Twin Disc Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, John Batten, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Chris Eperjesy, the company's Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. At this time I will turn the call over to Michael Batten. Mike.

Thank you, Stan and good afternoon everyone. Welcome to our fourth quarter and year-end conference call. As Stan has mentioned, I will start with a brief statement and then both Chris and I and John will be available to answer questions. Sales for the fourth quarter were $90.3 million, about equal to those reported for the same period a year ago at $90.8 million. For the fiscal year just ended sales were $331.7 million compared to $317.2 million recorded in the prior fiscal year. Foreign currency translation favorably impacted sales by $6.2 million and $16.7 million for the quarter and the year-to-date, respectively. In the quarter, softness in oil and gas transmission market was offset by continuing strong demand from the mega yacht and commercial marine markets. Net earnings for the fiscal 2008 fourth quarter were $7 million or $0.62 per diluted share compared to $5 million or $0.41 per diluted share for the comparable quarter last year. Net earnings for the fiscal 2007 fourth quarter were impacted by an after-tax restructuring charge of $1.8 million or $0.29 per diluted share, associated with our Belgian operation. For fiscal 2008, net earnings totaled $24.3 million, or $2.13 per share compared to $21.9 million or $1.84 per diluted share. Gross margins as a percent of sales for the fourth quarter were 32.1% compared to 33.1% for the same quarter a year ago. The net impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates was to increase gross profit by $1.8 million for the fourth quarter. For the year, gross margins were 31.6% compared to 32.4% last year. The net impact of foreign currency exchange rates was to increase gross profit by $4.9 million in the fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. Marketing, engineering, and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were…

Thank you, sir. (Operator instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Bo McKenzie with (inaudible) Capital. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Congratulations on the good quarter. If we were to look back into 2006, 2007, when there was an awful lot of equipment coming out for the pressure pumping and workover market, about what percentage in the business that represented at that point in time?

Well thanks for your comments, Bo. What you saw was a huge run up in orders that took place in our backlog during that period and the growth of actual shipments occurred of course on a delayed basis or off of that run up in backlog and in orders. So we don’t give out exact numbers on how much we have in each one sector, but we do have – we did see a significant run up in volume for us that did impact our overall sales rate and of course our profitability.

But, would it be fair then to say that the level that you got in the energy segment is at least, as a percentage of the business, substantially lower than it would have been a year ago or two years ago given the fact that a lot of the workover and pressure pumping business has shipped out?

That characterization would be valid. We are seeing that the pressure pumping sector of our business has declined over the last year starting in the second quarter of fiscal '08, the year just concluded. I might add though that we are very pleased about the fact that while that demand subsided somewhat, we have seen an offsetting and almost as profitable run up and continued run up in our commercial marine and mega yacht sales. So we have seen an ability to roughly maintain the margin rates.

Well if I'm right in terms of the data I've got, it does look like that pressure pumping side of the market's going to be coming back fairly soon, hopefully, knock on wood. Separately, if you were to look at some of the press releases that came out of Brunswick in the last quarter, obviously, their boat business has been going through it's share of issues. Now, they're in a totally different end of the market than you guys are, but is there kind of a rule of thumb you could give us about how much the top end of their business overlaps with yours and whether or not the – how would I say this – the lower end of the mega yacht business is seeing any kind of pressure as opposed to the high end?

Well, as you know, Bo, you're correct in your characterization that the troubles that are being experienced by our good friends at Brunswick relate primarily to the much smaller end of the personal watercraft side of the business, the lower end sub 500-horsepower segment. We don't have as much penetration in that area as we do in the higher horsepower segment, so your characterization is correct. There is some say erosion going on in the – again, the lower end of what might be the bottom end of the – the mega yacht market. It is not significant, but obviously we have seen some falloff there. But it's been more than adequately replaced by additions at the higher end.

And one last question. I'll turn it back over if that's all right. There are things that we've been trying to track in terms of the mega yacht end of the business and it seems like at least from a shipyard's perspective that there is a gigantic backlog that seems to stretch out for several years. Is that pretty much the way you would characterize what you're seeing, the 10 plus million dollar end of the yacht market is somewhat limited in its capacity to deliver finished product out right now, the stretching demand kind of further out into the future?

That's a fair characterization that the very high end is more or less at their capacity and they are seeing that their backlogs are extending. We're not aware of significant additions to the capacity of the industry at this point.

All right. Well, congratulations guys, and let's hope that we see during 2009 resurgence of the pressure pumping and workover markets as well. Thanks a lot.

We share the same thoughts. Thanks, Bo.

Thank you, sir. (Operator instructions) And our next question comes from the line of Bryan Dutt with Ironman Energy. Please go ahead. Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: Gentlemen, how are you doing this afternoon?

Fine, Bryan. Thank you. And you? Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: Good. Airport firefighting, is that– you said things are going well there– is that economically sensitive? Are you worried about any kind of downturn with the economy in that sector?

The exposure that we have is both U.S. and overseas. And our greatest area of growth and penetration has been occurring abroad. So it's largely dependent upon, (A) the creation of new airports and (B), the turnover or the upgrading of equipment at existing airports around the world. And so we have been successful in gaining new customer accounts and volume, particularly in Europe, but also in Asia, so we're seeing demand continue to grow in that area. Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: Okay. In terms of currency hedging, did you do any and have you considered any in the future?

Chris, why don't you just step in on that?

Yes, we do, do hedging at the transactional level, so we will hedge in particular receivables on transactions. But we haven't done any broad scale hedging beyond that. Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: Okay.

And you know we – as Mike has alluded to in prior calls we kind of have it going in both directions in that a little more than half of our revenue now is generated overseas. So there is somewhat of a natural hedge built in, but we do hedge at the transactional level. Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: And also on hedging, what about for steel or alloys and where is pricing going with that? Is that going in your favor now?

Mike. I'm sorry, the question, was, Bryan? Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: Commodity pricing, how it relates to you, steel or alloy or whatever.

Well we are seeing especially domestic steel prices accelerating and we presume that some of that is as a result of just their ability to do so against the euro. But that has – that has accelerated during the year into double digit. We are responding – John, do you want to pick up on our response?

Yes, the – as just mentioned, the surcharges in the material price increases have been much stronger in the U.S. than they have been in our European operations. Obviously, a lot of the cost in producing these materials is outside the dollar zone. And we've seen just more aggressive pricing here in North America than we have in Europe. Bryan Dutt – Ironman Energy: Okay. Great quarter. Thank you, gentlemen.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you, sir. And our next question is a follow-up question from the line of Bo McKenzie [ph]. Please go ahead.

Hi. I have one more question. This is more out of intellectual curiosity than anything else. You guys have got– is it the QuickShift transmission that’s the real smooth, low RPM kind of transmission that you developed for the mega yacht business? I believe you were saying at one point that you were looking to try to market that more towards the DP 2 market for fuel efficiency and stuff like that. There was some work going on in terms of upping the horsepower or whatever the right term would be there. I was just curious for a little bit of an update on how that’s going.

John?

Yes, Bo, you're absolutely right. We started off kind of in the pleasure craft 800-horsepower range and over the last two to three years have been essentially taking it to every transmission model whether it's pleasure craft or work boat above 500-horsepower. And we've now completed the designs on everything and we're just rolling out the last ones into production. Specifically the ones that you're mentioning for the DP 2 market which are produced here in Racine and they have been very well received in the marketplace by the operators because you're able to operate at a much lower operational RPM, once you're at the rigs, you're using less fuel. And for those listening in the call not familiar with DP 2, DP is the dynamic positioning that the supply boats and crew boats use when they're out next to the rigs out in the Gulf of Mexico or off the coast of Nigeria or wherever. Typically in the past they've been operating – these are four or five engine boats that are operating to stay on station and operating at or near full RPM with half the engines in reverse, half the engines in back to kind of hold station. Well a couple – obviously fuel prices are up and the requirements now with DP 2 are to hold a much tighter station. With our transmissions and the new clutching technology, vessels are able to do it at a much lower operational RPM, thus saving fuel. So we see there is potential out there for new builds and obviously for retrofits as the equipment and power train is replaced. So, Bo, yeah, we do see a big potential there and we're just starting to roll out essentially the whole line. We've had a couple of models here and there but more and more are starting to be released.

I may have my facts wrong which I occasionally do, but did you tell me that SEACOR has tried some of this and if so are you starting to see some reception from some of the other offshore support vessel owners in terms of at least looking at it?

All right. Well thanks a lot, guys.

Thanks, Bo.

Thank you, sir. Our next question comes from the Philip Zaire [ph] with The Algorithm Group [ph]. Please go ahead. Philip Zaire – The Algorithm Group: Yes, I hopped on the call a little late. Have you given color yet on your tax rate for fiscal '09? Do you expect to have the favorable tax adjustments foreign and state similar to what you had in this quarter?

Chris?

No. I mean those really were items that occurred in the fourth quarter and in some cases through the year. For example there was the Italian corps [ph] income – the income tax corporate rate change that occurred in the year and certainly that will have some benefit going forward, but not the magnitude that was announced in the third quarter, which is really the catch up. So, I guess the quick answer is no, I wouldn't anticipate those similar either magnitude– in particular magnitude adjustment. So if you adjusted those out – and it depends on the geographic distribution of our earnings in any given year but that 37% to 39% effective tax rate range is still applicable. Philip Zaire – The Algorithm Group: Right. And my other question, I had – I was fortunate to visit the Palmer Johnson facilities up in Sturgeon Bay and there happened to be one of the 120 sport yachts. I don't know if you're familiar with that?

Yes. Philip Zaire – The Algorithm Group: That type of – that's a unique boat, that's for sure, unique yacht. But with that type of sport yacht– would that be using Twin Disc any, whether propulsion or thrusters or anything?

That could use a whole host of our equipment. That one has MTU engines in it from Friedrichshafen, Germany. There's a better than 50/50 chance that it has ZF gearboxes from Friedrichshafen, Germany as well. Those are packaged at the factory in Germany. But as far as the thrusters and things like that, that is precisely the market that we're going after. Philip Zaire – The Algorithm Group: Great. Thank you.

Thank you, sir. (Operator instructions) And at this time we have no further questions. I would like to turn it back to management for any closing remarks.

Well, we would like to thank you all very much for your attendance this afternoon. And I appreciate your interest in Twin Disc and your following our company. As you know, if you have any follow-up questions that you think of after the call, please feel free to give us a ring at our offices in Racine. In the meantime, enjoy your day. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the Twin Disc Incorporated 2008 fourth quarter financial results conference call. This conference will be available for replay after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard time today through August 8th at midnight. You may access the replay system at any time by dialing 303-590-3030 or 1-800-406-7325 and entering pass code 3900293. Once again, if you would like to listen to a replay of today's conference, please dial 303-590-3030 or 1-800-406-7325, entering pass code 3900293. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a pleasant day.