Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the TTM Technologies Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. During today’s presentation, all parties will be in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, the conference will open for questions. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded today July 28, 2021. Sameer Desai, TTM’s Vice President of Corporate Development and Investor Relations will now review TTM’s disclosure statement. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Travis. Before we get started, I would like to remind everyone that today’s call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements related to TTM’s future business outlook. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements, due to one or more risks and uncertainties, including the factors explained in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s expectations and assumptions as the date of this presentation. TTM does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any of these statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or other circumstances except as required by law. Please refer to the disclosures regarding the risks that may affect TTM, which may be found in reports on Form 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, the registration statement on Form S-4 and the company’s other SEC filings. We will also discuss on this call certain non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted EBITDA. Such measures should not be considered as a substitute for the measures prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP and we direct you to the reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP measures, included in the company’s press release, which was filed with the SEC and is available on TTM’s website at www.ttm.com. We’ve also posted on our website a slide deck, which we will refer to during our call. I will now turn the call over to Tom Edman, TTM’s Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, Tom.

Thank you, Sameer. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter 2021 conference call. I'll begin with a review of our business strategy, followed by highlights from the quarter and a discussion of our second quarter results. Todd Schull, our CFO will follow with an overview of our Q2 2021 financial performance and our Q3 2021 guidance. We will then open the call to your questions. I am pleased to report that in the second quarter of 2021 TTM generated revenues and non-GAAP EPS above the high end of the guided range. All commercial end markets were better than guidance and year-on-year growth was led by strength in the automotive and data centre computing markets. These results were achieved despite supply chain constraints, inflationary challenges and foreign exchange headwinds. Last quarter, I discussed with you, the increasing prices and lead times of laminates, a key raw material for the manufacturer of printed circuit boards. We have been actively managing those supply constraints and higher raw material costs through such measures and supplier diversification, ongoing operational efficiency efforts, and quotation adjustments to mitigate the impact to TTM. The magnitude of the impact to our cost of goods sold will be larger in Q3 and Q4. Since higher laminate prices in Q1 and Q2, take some time to work through our suppliers and inventory. I am proud of how TTM employees have worked to deliver excellent performance despite the formidable challenges of this environment. Next, I would like to provide an update on our long term strategy. TTM is on a journey to transform our business to be less cyclical and more differentiated. We believe that over time, investors will be rewarded with more stable growth, strong cash flow performance, and improving margins. As part of this strategic…

Thanks, Tom, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll be reviewing our financial results for the second quarter, which are also shown in the press release distributed today. As well as on page 7 of our earnings presentation which is posted on our website. For the second quarter net sales are $567.4 million compared to $570.3 million from continuing operations in the second quarter of 2020. Year-over-year decrease in revenue was due to the closure of our two EMF facilities, which generated $21 million of revenues in Q2 of last year, and no revenues in this most recent quarter. Excluding that impact, revenues of ongoing business grew 3.4% year-on-year, as growth in our automotive and data centre computing end markets more than offset declines in other end markets. GAAP operating income for the second quarter of 2021 was $40.9 million compared to GAAP operating income from continuing operations of $23 million in the second quarter of 2020. On a GAAP basis, net income in the second quarter of 2021 was $28.3 million, or $0.26 per diluted share. This compares the net income from continuing operations of $9.3 million or $0.09 per diluted share in the second quarter of last year. The remainder of my comments will focus on our non-GAAP financial performance. Our non-GAAP performance excludes our divested mobility business units, non-routine tax items, M&A related costs, restructuring costs, certain non-cash expense items and other unusual and infrequent items. We present non-GAAP financial information to enable investors to see the company to the eyes of management and to facilitate comparison with expectations and prior periods. Gross Margin in the second quarter was 18%, compared to 18.4% in the second quarter of 2020. The year-on-year decline was largely due to the appreciation of the Chinese currency versus the US dollar in our China…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from William Stein, Truist Securities.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. Congrats on the good quarterly results. I think op margin took a nice ticket up to 9.7% in the quarter. I recall you have historically had a 12% to 14% target on this metric. But that was before the divestitures that you did. And I'm wondering, whether you still think 12% to 14% is a good target and whether you have a timeframe that you have in mind to achieve it?

I'll take that one. Good to hear your voice again, Will. In response to your question, yes, we still believe in those targets. A key for us was a couple of things. One was, getting our utilization levels up in Asia. And we're starting to see that point now. So that's a very favorable development. And then second is, continuing to grow our aerospace and defense business, particularly our RF components and sub assemblies portion of that business, which has better than usual PCB fabrication margins, so that that's the key element that needs to continue -- that we need to continue to drive. And then the other thing we have to do is, some of the good news that we would have expected to have seen already from the improved utilization in Asia has been a little bit muted by the inflationary costs that we've been seeing in terms of raw materials that Tom commented on in his opening remarks, as well as we're seeing a tighter labor force, so we have challenges getting the labor and then basically, as a result of that you're seeing some price inflation or wage inflation from the labor too. So, those two elements are kind of working against us. Headwinds, if you will, that are muting the benefit that we would normally see from the growth and improved utilization in Asia. But those are I view as temporary things that we will work through mitigating to ongoing cost management actions as well as pricing actions. So, I view those as transitionary or temporary in nature. But they will be with us here -- have been for a quarter or two and probably will be for a couple of more quarters.

A follow-up to that, Todd, I appreciate it. But I just want to dig into that a little bit more. With regard to the inflationary cost -- input costs. Labor is one thing, but on the material side, we've seen among other component suppliers and in particular, semi, but other components as well. We've seen a very strong willingness and ability -- well, willingness among the suppliers and also willingness among the party -- willingness among the sellers, but willing is also among the buyers to accept higher prices in this environment, lead-times are stretched, maybe they're not quite as stretched for your parts. Their input costs are going up in particular, cost at foundry, semiconductor costs are going up. Semis are raising prices to their customers, pretty well across the board, even in markets where you really don't expect this means the automotive and the customers are paying it. I'm wondering if this is a matter of -- I'm wondering why we're not seeing that in your business release, what it comes down to? Thank you.

Yes, so Will, this is this Tom. Let me cover that. First of all, just to explain some of the dynamics of work here in the printed circuit board business in particular, but also in our tire business, if we have a set of businesses approximately depends on the given quarter. But if you think about 40% to 50%, of our commercial business is related to more spot type non-contractual business. And then if you think about our A&D business, about half of the business in A&D is related to either, again, spot or non-contractual business or contracts with escalation provisions. So, the balance of the business about 50% would be related to contracts that we have with our customers. So, we have, obviously, immediately as we received increases -- or even forecasted increases, we're able to incorporate that in our quote models and take care of the 40% to 50% of commercial and the 50% of A&D that I talked about. It's the balance that we're really addressing now and that and that takes negotiations. Obviously, the best time to negotiate with a contractual customer is when the contract comes up for renewal, which we -- which they do -- we -- most of our contractual relationships come up for renewal every year, if not more often. And so that's when you have your price negotiation. In some cases, we've had to go back to even those customers and talk about the present situation and ask and ask for their understanding, I would say that on balance, we've been able to mitigate approximately 75% of that -- of the increases that we've been receiving. And, frankly, I consider that, that's pretty good, given the portion of our business that is contractual. We've also, of course, as we always do, we focus on the cost side of the equation, and improving operational efficiencies, and that's a constant for us. So that continues to be the other area of focus. And as we go through contract contractual negotiations with our customers, we'll be talking through the pricing situation. So that's how -- that's really the how it works in the printed circuit board world. And, we're going to continue to work through this. And as Todd said, we are confident that we'll be able to mitigate, it's just a question of time as we work through those mitigation strategies.

Thank you.

Sure.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Jim Ricchiuti, Needham & Company.

Hi. Good afternoon. I may have missed it, but you're talking about Poland's. Can you just say or elaborate on where you were seeing the Poland's, in which market verticals? And maybe what was driving? And how unusual is that is to say?

Yes. Sure. Yes and predominantly where we where we saw that was in our, in the datacenter computing end-market and a little bit in the networking and the networking side as well. And not unusual Jim, if you look at the blending of Q2, Q3 and so I would consider that it sort of not is normal to think about it in terms of multiple quarters. And generally we were, because in Q2, as we highlighted, Q2 we have add many more days of production in North America, coupled with the excellent utilization rates that we have in Asia Pacific. So we were able to push that product out and our customers were pulling that product as we go into the 3Q, here in those two areas, were expecting that we'll see, a little bit of a more subdued demand. But really on the on the edges, if you will feel very strong environment. And then, the other factor is just the ability with vacations in North America. Q3 is always going to be from a production output standpoint, lower production output quarter for us, versus Q2. So those are the sort of two factors that that we're absorbing at this point in Q3.

And I don't know if you want to size it quantify a Tom. And the other question and the last question I had is just on the utilization rates, you guys alluded to the higher utilization rates in Asia Pacific. But I'm just wondering, are you at all concerned about your North American utilization rates?

Yes. I think I think the way to look at it on in terms of sizing is just look at the end-market forecast that we provided. And if you look at sort of Q3 versus Q2, you'll see in the datacenter area down about 6% and networking and telecom down about 2%. Bulk of that's going to be related to the inventories and so that quarter-to-quarter blurring, if you will, of the demand. And then, if you look at A&D, Q3 to Q2, down about 3%, and a portion of MII, which is down again about 6%. That's more related to production limitations in North America. So that's how a good way to look at it. If -- in terms of utilization, I can't tell you how excited we are about, it's funny to say that North -- yes, North America utilization rates are down. But what that really signifies is the fact that we added two plating lines in the quarter. And those are vertical plating lines, they're core to our process, represents our ability in the future here to respond through the robust demand that we are feeling out there in the marketplace, and to continue our ability to respond to quick turn requirements as well in those facilities. We, obviously, have to continue to work on our staffing in our North America facilities. But this gives us the equipment capacity that we need, particularly in those two facilities that were bottlenecked by plating. And, again, adding plating lines, great indicator to our customers that we are prepared to service their heightened demand levels.

Got it. Thanks very much.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Matt Sheerin, Stifel.

Hi Matt.

Hey, hey, everyone. Just a question regarding the margin headwinds that you're seeing first on the labor side, and on the materials side. It sounds like and you're not the only one saying conditions have probably worsen today since a quarter or two ago. Do you have any visibility into when this stabilizes, and sounds like you're catching up a little bit on passing those costs along, but do you see any further progress in the December quarter?

So, kind of, add to what Tom said earlier about the process and how we can deal with pricing in our process. What we've seen now is increases over a period of time. They've been working themselves through the pipeline at our suppliers and then to our inventory and then out to customers and as we try to balance that cost increase, which we've seen pretty steadily and significantly over the last few quarters, we're now -- we're working to try to get in front of that and work with our customers on pricing. But on that 50% or so of the revenue stream that takes longer to deal with that Tom was referring to earlier, we're making progress, Q3 has got a bit of a gap, we did really well, I think in Q2, there was a smaller hill decline, the team did a really good job getting in front of it and working with customers and more or less mitigated the impact of that particular component of inflation for our business, and Q3 though these costs keep ramping, and we've been working with our customers, and we see it into q4. At this point, we know it's hard to forecast our customer -- our suppliers are going to be continue to increase pricing on us in August and September. But where we are today, we're implementing solutions to mitigate what we see today. And that will have a better benefit in Q4 than in Q3, we have better coverage, already Tom alluded to the 75% or so. I like it to climbing a mountain. And we're 75% of the way up that mountain in Q3. And the team is still working hard to try to get over that hump, but it's going to be tougher this quarter. But the Q4 piece of that we're in better position because we have more runway and we've been working that issue for a longer period of time. That is of course subject to what our suppliers might continue to do to us here over the next few months. That is a moving target. That has been increasing here overtime. But we think we've got a plan in place. We're executing. We're closing that gap. We think Q3 at this point looks to be the most challenging quarter from that perspective, but that's subject to what happens in the marketplace from our suppliers as we go forward there.

Yes. And I'd only add Matt that we -- so that what Todd is talking about also is inclusive of what we are seeing and forecasting with from our vendors as we look at their -- what we understand to be their plans. And, as you know, this is sort of the -- these are the times when you really understand the true partnership with vendors, the vendors that are able to forecast and that are doing their utmost to meet demand requirements in a transparent fashion. Those are the two partners. And we have a number of them that really has stepped up. And so from that standpoint, we really are trying to understand where the market is going and make sure that that our customers understand that as well.

Okay. Thanks for that. And could you remind us what percentage of cost of goods is represented by the laminate -- the copper-clad laminate?

So it is probably our single largest material cost that goes into -- our overall cost of goods sold. And in total, if you look at laminate as a percentage of our total cost of goods sold, it's about 14.5%. If you look at all of the copper related stuff and precious metals that we use, it's maybe an aggregate about 20% of our total cost of goods sold is really what we're talking about here.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just -- a second -- my second question, just regarding M&A, Tom and obviously that's been a key part of your growth strategy. And you've had a lot of success with integrating acquisitions and Anaren, obviously, broaden your product portfolio. What's your thoughts there in terms of opportunities? Obviously, your balance sheet has been improving? What should we think about the M&A here?

Yes. I think you pointed out -- it is -- it has been core to our strategy and it will continue to be a critical element of our strategy. We're still working the revenue synergies if you will on the Anaren side, and that certainly on the commercial side of the business that involves the cross-selling efforts that we're involved in. And then there's a very close relationship between our RF component design efforts and our printed circuit board support. And so we've -- obviously it's now we're approaching well within three years and that relationship now is -- just optimal. And so we have product now that is out in the market. We've been building our catalogue beyond just couplers and resistors and adding transceivers and other components there and actively working on new markets beyond telecom where we've done very well. But continuing to look at add opportunities in automotive, some in optical networking as well. So I really would like to compliment our team on how they continue to focus on that business development, that's really about differentiation and direction that we are going in as a company. As we look at M&A, absolutely, looking at building on that capability, on the RF component side, looking at our aerospace and defense strength and adding engineering capability there, and then continuing to build out make sure that we have the right footprint to support our customers on the commercial side of the business is the third element. And so we're continuing to work on -- work that pipeline, that's a longer-term effort for us. Strategically, the first sort of hurdle, if you will, internally is to make sure that there's a strong strategic set. But then over and above that, we need to make sure that acquisition satisfy financial criteria. We continue to see elevated multiples in the market and elevated multiple expectations. That will change here going forward. It always does adjust that certainly as we look at our second critical hurdle, which is -- are the financial metrics, that's going to open up some of those strategic opportunities. So we're going to continue to work that and it's a process that is very much alive and well and a critical part of our strategy there.

Okay. All right. Thanks a lot, Tom.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Mike Crawford, B. Riley Securities.

Thank you. Regarding the automotive business, can you talk about design wins and conventional mix versus ED, which I think in the past have been around 77%. And also regarding design wins, I think in 2019 and 2020 combined, you had over a $1 billion of design wins. And so where that stands today, as far as 2021 and outlook for the future?

Sure. Yes. Let me start with the design wins, we in this most recent quarter, won about 47 new automotive design wins lifetime -- with a lifetime program value of about 121 million. And a good decent portion of that was on the non-conventional side of the business. So that gives you -- should give you a flavor of this most recent quarter. And what I would say in terms of the overall automotive product mix relatively constant and what we reported last year about 26% of the overall business was non-conventional. So, advanced technology capability, so about 26% the balance would be conventional and clearly our focus continues to be on building that advanced technology content in that automotive business. And with that focus on new design wins. So good progress, solid progress, I would say in the quarter. And certainly strong prospects here. And finally just a comment on the revenue. I think, we hitting again 2018 levels. Very, very nice to see in particular we saw demand growth in Europe, as a region. North America and Asia still remained at a high levels. But to see Europe come in, into the mix and grow is was really the change quarter-to-quarter for us. So good, strong demand there.

Okay. Thank you. And then just further regarding advanced technology, what percent of revenue I know it seems a quite small as a triple to i3. And given that you divested some capabilities with the mobility business, like how important are differentiated solutions you can provide with that, i3 intellectual property and assets that you acquired a couple of years ago?

Yes. So you're right. So from a percentage of total revenue, still pretty small. We track the opportunities that comes out of our ACC as we call it, our Advanced Technology Centre. And that Advanced Technology Centre in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin is where we move the i3 assets. In that facility, we're doing substrate like printed circuit board capability, we supply our own needs there for that, so fine lines and spacing. And you can think about very dense circuits. We don't break that out in terms of revenue. But I can tell you that, particularly as we look at our aerospace and defense customer roadmaps, the capability is lining up very well with their interest and as well as with their own technology roadmaps going forward. So today, we're supporting down to about a 25 micron lines and spacing kind of area, we expect that to continue to push downward here as we go through the course of the next five years, or so. And our plan is to support that, at that need. That's probably the -- what I can tell you Mike, just a good, good, solid progress there coming out of the UTC.

Okay, Thank you. And then final question will switch the gears but it looks like you guys are getting back into absolute live trade show circuit in September with a defense show in London. But how does that affect business development going forward?

It's always better to be face to face. You're absolutely right Mike. I mean, it's been challenging for our field application engineering team and our sales team to they've done a great job of interacting with our customers remotely, but to be face to face to be able to get out to tradeshows and participate again, more than anything else. It's just that our -- as -- our mission is really to inspire innovation at our customers. And the best way to inspire innovation is to be sitting together and helping and -- helping on the design process, and also designing to meet specifications that are laid out on the table by our customers. So closer interaction is a real positive.

Excellent. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Christian Schwab, Craig Hallum.

Hi. This is Tyler [ph] on behalf of Christian. Thanks for let us ask couple questions. First, last quarter, you guys outlined the your quantify the impact from these commodity prices and labor and FX impacts is 13 million, I believe. And I don't think I heard you quantify this quarter, if you could? And then it appears like your Q3 guidance at the midpoint implies gross margins are going to be up sequentially above 18%. I guess first, is that correct? And then, what's kind of the driver there?

Well, to answer your first question on the second quarter the headwinds from the -- from the inflationary issues, primarily raw material costs we were able to mitigate those. So that really wasn't a big factor in the quarter. It'll be a little more challenging in the -- in the third quarter as we look at expectations, because there's a bigger mountain to climb and we have not solutions or mitigated all of the cost pressure that we're seeing in the third quarter. So we have a bit of a shortfall there. And that will impact and factors into our guidance. When you look at our Q3 forecasts, and kind of just contrasting that with Q2, because of the similarity with the inflationary factors, that becomes a bit of a challenge yes, you’re right. Our margins actually -- our margins are stable to in terms of gross margin probably stable to slightly down. But when you get down to operating margins with that -- that's going to trickle through, you'll see a similar effect. So from a margin percentage standpoint as our EPS guidance, which suggests you're seeing a little bit of reduction there and that shortfall, or that decrease sequentially is really being driven by the inflationary pressures. That's the gap between our costs that are increasing and, and what we've been able to mitigate. Now, we're going to work to try to close that gap. But that's what we see as of this point in time.

Okay. Great. And then the second question, a little bit of a follow-up, your utilization rates in the United States, you said, I think was 49% this quarter and below Asia. But you're encouraged with the plate machinery you added as a bottleneck, so I guess, what's kind of a target rate there at some point in the future rate -- what’s the target rate in the United States?

Yes. Sure. Sure, sure. Yes. So, if we're in North America, because so much of the business bases is quick turn, you have to have -- you have to have excess capacity available to meet those needs. And then you also have bottlenecks that move around because of that high mix low volume nature of the North American business. So utilizations not a great indicator of profitability, if you will, because of that, but if you were to ask, what are we -- what would we really like to see there? When we're at 60%? We're doing awfully well. We -- if we ever started pushing to 70%, we'd -- we need to dramatically, we need to dramatically address that. So hopefully, that gives you a flavor, as we bring up the equipment that we've now installed, as we bring in labor and we certainly hope we're going to start seeing better labor availability in the fall, that will help us to raise -- raise up that utilization rate above the 50% area and point towards that 60% again.

That's great. That's all for me. Thanks, guys.

Thank you.

There are no further questions in the queue at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Tom.

Okay, great. Yes, thank you. And I wanted to first thank all of you for attending. Hopefully you understand. And I'll just highlight a few of the factors from the quarter. We delivered revenues and earnings of the high end of guidance. We did that, despite COVID-19-related and supply chain challenges. And our end market diversification again, really pulled through for us solid year-on-year growth of 3% for our ongoing business. And then thirdly, we generated strong and consistent cash flow, a nice demonstration of financial discipline on the part of our team. And finally, I'd just like to thank you again, thank our employees and customers and vendors as well for your continued support. Thank you very much.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect.