Welcome to TSMC's third quarter 2016 earnings conference and conference call. This is Elizabeth Sun, TSMC's Director of Corporate Communication and your host for today. Today's event is webcast live through TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com. If you're joining us via the conference call your dial in number are in listen only mode and this conference is being viewed by investors around the world. We will conduct this event in English only. The format for today's event will be as follows. First TSMC's Senior Vice President and CFO Ms. Lora Ho will summarize our operations in the third quarter of 2016 followed by our guidance for the fourth quarter of 2016. Afterwards TSMC's two presidents and co-CEOs Dr. Mark Liu and Dr. C.C. Wei and Ms. Ho will jointly provide our key messages. Then we will open both the floor and the line for the Q&A. With those participants on the call if you do not yet have a copy of the press release you may download it from TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com. Please also download the summary slides in relation to today's earnings conference presentation. As usual I would like to remind everybody that today's discussions may contain forward looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward looking statements. Please refer to the Safe Harbor notice that appears on our press release. And now I would like to turn the podium to TSMC's CFO Ms. Lora Ho for the summary of operations and current quarter guidance.

Thank you Elizabeth. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us today. Our presentation will start with the financial highlights for the third quarter followed by the guidance for the fourth quarter. We have just finished another solid quarter, despite a less favorable foreign exchange rate. Our third quarter revenue increased 17% sequentially to 260 billion NT dollars, exceeding the high end of our guidance given in July due to the strong demand in overall Smartphone market. Gross margins declined 0.8 percentage point sequentially to 50.7% mainly due to an unfavorable foreign exchange rate and the margin dilution from higher 16-nanometer contribution, partially balanced by a higher utilization rate and cost improvement. R&D expense continues to increase reflecting a high level of development activities for 7-nanometer, since our revenue grow faster than R&D expense. Total operating expense to revenue was 9.9%, operating margin was 40.8% in the third quarter. Overall our third quarter earnings per share reached $3.73, a 33% increase Q-over-Q and a 28% year-over-year and ROE for the third quarter was 31.2%. Now let's take a look at a revenue contributions by applications, our third quarter business benefited from the new mobile product launches as well as the robust overall Smartphone demand. Revenue increased across the board in all product segments. Communication and industrial center increased by 19% and 16% respectively while computer and consumer also increased by 3% and 8% respectively. In terms of revenue by technology combined revenue from 16-nanometer and 20-nanometer continued to grow and represented 31% of wafer revenue in the third quarter compared to 23% in the second quarter. Meanwhile our 28-nanometer capacity remained fully utilized and represented 24% of our wafer revenue in the third quarter. Moving on to balance sheet, we ended the second quarter with cash and marketable securities…

Good afternoon, I would like to start delivering our key messages. Let me start from our near term outlook. We concluded our third quarter with 17% quarter-to-quarter and 22% year-to-year revenue growth. This strong growth was driven by our major customers' new mobile product launch and a stronger than seasonal growth from our other customers. In the third quarter we gained our foundry market share across most technology nodes. With strong sell through we estimate fabless DOI exiting the third quarter will be only slightly above seasonal level. We saw the Smartphone sales improving coming into second half this year. High end Smartphone demand today is better than we previously expected. The 4G plus deployment in China and the 4G upgrade in emerging markets also drive end demand. PC gaming and TV gaming markets driven by product refresh are showing good growth. Also deep learning is increasingly applied to many diversified areas. So we forecast our fourth quarter revenue to be about flat from the third quarter. The demand for high end Smartphone will continue to improve. We estimate the yearend inventory reduction will be relatively mild. So exiting 2016 the fabless DOI will be slightly higher than seasonal level by about 2 days. For the whole year of 2016, we forecast semiconductor market revenue excluding memory will have 1% growth, foundry revenue will have 7% growth and TSMC revenue will achieve 10% growth in US dollars and 11% to 12% in NT dollars. Now I come to the leading edge technology, sellers and competition. First on 7-nanometer, our 7-nanometer technology development is well on track. The progress of yield improvement and device performance development are both on schedule. We are confident our 7-nanometer technology to be ahead of our competition. Our plan of risk production qualification in 1Q '17…

Thank you, Mark. Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, let me start with 10-nanometer status. We have transferred our 10-nanometer from R&D to production in third quarter this year. Our first 10-nanometer customer product has been produced with reasonable yield, the density and device performance continue to improve in much the same way as we did as Rambus stage of every leading-edge technology node. So far we have received the five production tape-outs or high-end mobile products. We're preparing capacity for 10-nanometer production Rambus by the end of this year and expect shipment in the first quarter next year. Currently, there are about 2,500 engineers and 1,200 technicians are working in the fabs on 10-nanometer. Additional 1,000 engineers and 500 technicians will be added to our 10-nanometer production team by end of this year for the preparation of volume ramp in 2017. As to our 16-nanometer FinFET, the deeper density and cycle time continue to improve and are very competitive. In addition to mobile application processor other applications such as cellular base band, graphic processor for video game, AR, VR, deep learning in AI have strongly adopted our 16-nanometer solutions. As a result our 16-nanometer business this year is expected to become more than fivefold of this level compared to last year. In order to support applications for mid-to-low end Smartphone and wearable products, we continue to work with customer to further shrink the die size while improving the performance in 16FFC. Now on 28-nanometer, the demand for our 28-nanometer technology has continued to be strong throughout this year and is expected to last through many years. So we're judiciously adding some bottleneck [ph] tools to meet the strong demand. Applications related to mid-and low-end Smartphones as well as a Wi-Fi, digital TV set-top box, plus controller and other has won…

I would like to make few comments on capital expenditure, profitability and dividend. So, first regarding CapEx, TSMC's 2016 capital budget is estimated to be slightly above 9.5 billion as I said earlier which is closer to our low end of our guidance and we've guided 9.5 billion to 10.5 billion three months ago. It is mainly due to improving cycle time estimated for 10-nanometer, we're able to shorten the lead time for capacity installations which leads to a reduction of our 2016 estimated CapEx. However this reduction in 2016 will now change our planned capacity for 10-nanometer in 2017. Our estimate for the capital intensity going forward remains unchanged at around low-to-mid 30s level for the next few years. I'll talk about profitability. In the past few years, despite the higher CapEx which lead to a substantial increase in depreciation expenses we have been able to improve our structural profitability significantly. We plan to keep our structural profitability at high level by continuing working on price, cost and the utilization rate with careful planning of capacity. Going forward we expect to be able to maintain our growth margin rate at close to 50% level. My last comment about the dividend. Given our target revenue gross rate for the 2015 to 2020 five-year period to be compounded annual growth of between 5% and 10%. And our capital intensity to stay at low to mid 30s of our revenue, we anticipate an improving free cash flow after debt service in the next few years. Therefore, we also expect our dividend per share to increase in the next few years. This concludes my remarks.

All right, this concludes our prepared statements. Before we begin the Q&A session, I would like to remind everybody to limit your questions to two at a time to allow all participants an opportunity to ask questions. Questions will be taken both from the floor and from the call. Should you wish to raise your questions in Chinese, I will translate it to English before our management answers your question.

[Operator Instructions] Now let's begin the Q&A session. First person raised their hand is Deutsche Bank, Michael Chou.

My first question is regarding the 16-nanomter UTR next year given that your key customer may shift to 10-nanometer next year for high-end products, so what is your expectation for UTR next year, in 16 nodes?

For UTR, actually you're asking for the 16-nanometer business next year?

Yes.

As there are some mid and low end Smartphones will enter into this node, so far so good.

So does that mean to you will have a similar URT label next year versus this year?

Roughly.

Roughly, thank you. Second question is regarding your 28-nanometer market share next year. Do you expect it could be still very dominant next year versus this year, given rising competition from tier 2 foundries?

I just mentioned that we're confident to maintain the market segment this year, so yes.

A follow-up question for 28-nanometer, do you expect T2 foundry can gain market share in high-K/metal gate area more substantially next year, because given that it seems that UMC may try to increase high-K/metal gate shipment next year?

Would you please repeat your question for the high-K/metal gate?

Yes, given that UMC may try to increase high-K/metal gate shipment next year, so how do you have a very high market share in 28-nanometer next year?

I just mentioned that a lot of customers find our solutions very desirable and so again I'd like to say that we are confident to maintain our market share this year.

Next question will be coming from Credit Suisse Question will be coming from Credit Suisse, Randy Abrams.

Yes, thank you. You gave us some good figures on the growth drivers in new areas. Traditionally IDMs have had a lot of market share in high performance computing, automotive and even micro controller and IoT. Your foundry share's 55%, if you could give some approximation what you expect your share in these where you put, HPC 15 billion, Auto about 6 billion, and IoT growing 6 billion. If you could talk about what your market share in these that traditionally have been IDM applications.

On this high performance computing, I cited $15 billion next five years. It's really a rough estimate. Many of the application we cannot really grasp today, like artificial intelligence. We don't know how fast and what form it will grow. So this is based on current knowledge. And we've been -- indeed this high-performance computing include center, network, storage and all the silicon attached -- associated with the data center. And also include AR and VR and gaming and that's our definition, not including artificial intelligence yet. Today, in this sector, we have about 30% share. Of course we want to grow with the total segment and we also want to increase our share, together with other IDMs.

And could you talk about the automotive, what the contribution -- well, you talked about doubling the revenue. If you could give a starting point for market share in automotive?

We are working on this automotive platform across all the technology nodes actually. So we expect to grow in this area much faster than the market showed. Today, we -- most of our product is on the MCUs. And we expect that going into a lot of high-speed computation, just like Mark pointed out, and also a lot of sensors will come with it. And so we expect to grow the market. So I don't know if that whether I answered your question on the automotive?

Or if you could give how much automotive is today for TSMC, like percentage of revenues?

Today, it's below 1 billion.

My second question about the margins, where you're guiding a little bit down in sales, but the margins are improving. And it looks like for next year, if I caught it right, it was 49% to 50%, but it's moved up a bit to 50%. You talked some on cycle time, it's a factor from cycle time improvement. And if you could talk about what strides you're making on the cycle time or if there's other factors driving that margin improvement?

Cycle time, when I referred to the CapEx I was talking about cycle time improvement actually help the capital to be more efficient. That's why we can spend less money but you get same capacity investment. Of course, cycle time helps yield as well. So that means when you start production then the yield can reach to optimal sooner, of course that will help the margin as well. You were talking about the 2017. In my prepared message, I was talking about our effort on structural profitability improvement, our confidence on maintaining 50% level. Given this year's depreciation is only increased a little bit, and our CapEx is very much back-end loaded as you can see first half only about 30% and second half maybe 70%, so we expect the margin will -- we expect depreciation will go up next year. Although I cannot quantify the number because we are still working on a CapEx number for next year, but with all those plus and minus reasons, we are still confident that the margin will be close to 50%.

Just one quick follow up, on the fourth quarter you have a couple of headwinds from currency and utilization, I guess, slightly lower. So just the improvement sequentially, is that from a 16-nanometer yield earning or if there's a factor that's offsetting that to drive the improvement in fourth quarter?

16-nanometer will be a key reason because you know we are ramping very fast in 16-nanometer. In 16-nanometer it's the second year of production. I think you still remember you asked me, when can the 16-nanometer reach to corporate level? We expect the 16-nanometer it will reach the corporate level by first quarter 2017. So fourth quarter is very close to that corporate level. So that really helps our margin rate.

Next, questions will be coming from Citigroup's Roland Shu.

Last quarter we thought the customers are probably going to adjusting inventory in 4Q, but looking at your 4Q guidance now it seems that customers are actually still building the inventory. So will this inventory correction be delayed to first quarter next year and we are going to see a sub-seasonal first quarter next year?

I mentioned -- our estimate that fourth quarter will be flat. It's because the -- we see the end market demand is still healthy and therefore we also estimate the previously anticipated inventory reduction at the end of the fourth quarter will be mild. This is also supported by our major customers' 16-nanometer ramp. So that supports the fourth quarter results. So I think this -- the end of this year is more peaceful than previous years.

Okay, so that means that inventory correction probably won't be the case in first quarter next year?

Right. But the fourth quarter -- I don't think there's a major inventory adjustment in the fourth quarter either of general customers. But there are seasonalities. There are seasonalities that is not -- we cannot avoid it. And particularly the big customers' seasonality, that is I think the only factor that affects the fourth quarter. But many things can still happen between now and then. So right now it's too early to tell.

My second question is from different angle. Intel is licensing ARM’s physical IP for 14- nanometer and the 10-nanometer process manufacturers. We know you don't comment your customer and the competitors directly. However, from the industry and from technical perspective, how do you think that impacts to the overall foundry and that impacts to TSMC going forward? Thank you.

Well, I think that strengthens the ARM based CPU in the processing world. And we have traditionally very strong in ARM based ecosystem. As much as this -- the ARM and also many architectural licensed people. So its proof that this, in order to get to the non-datacenter world this is the ecosystem you're going to ride. How much threat? We don't know, of course we never underestimate our competitions. Yes.

Thank you.

Next question will be coming from UBS, Bill Lu.

First question is a follow-up on HPC. Mark said that this business becomes more than 15 billion by 2020. Can you talk a little bit more about the different segments of HPC and what do you think are the big opportunities within that 15 billion? Secondly, when I talked to your customers, it seems like a lot of people think that you need 7-nanometers for this to take off. So this is maybe hockey-sticking after 7-nanometers. I'm wondering if you would agree with that -- what is the linearity of that business? Thank you.

First part you asked, what is the component of HPC? Well, it includes many things associated with data center. It includes the network processors and also includes switches and in our domain we include gaming and VR and AR and so forth. So for those market we are in a good position. However, for data center we are trying to get into a good position. Yes, indeed we see our growth -- we expect our growth momentum will shift from high -- from mobile to high performance computing around 2019. So that's the ballpark estimate. It will depend on our 7-nanometer, but also there are many other processors. There are many other processors that are still using 10-nanometer, still using 16-nanometer. And even 28-nanometer in this high performance computing sector.

I'm sorry if I wasn't clear. I appreciate the answer but I'm just wondering, within HPC if you can look at -- of the things that you talked about -- data centers and switches, et cetera., VR, AR -- how big is each or maybe you can rank them in terms of the opportunity?

I haven't bring it with me. So -- but this is -- these are the industry models. They're existing industry models, you can estimate. It's not very special. Not particularly TSMC's secret. Okay.

My second question is on packaging. I think roughly maybe about a year ago maybe a little bit more, you talked about InFO being about 100 million by fourth quarter of this year with gross margin below corporate average. If we now look into second half of 2017 can you give us the same kind of forecast with InFO and COAS [ph] both in terms of revenue opportunity and margins? Thank you.

Well, I cannot predict that 2017 second half, but I can tell you that revenue will be greater. Margin will be better.

That's actually a very happy answer. Let's go to the line now. Operator, please have the caller on the line.

My first question is can you comment on your silicon content for smartphones for this year and next year? And if you can specify low end and high end as before that will be good. The second question is on your 10-nanometer yield ramp. Is the progress within expectation or is that a little better or worse? And also I think you commented that the shipment for the first product will start in 20 -- Q1 next year. And maybe you can specify whether early Q1 or later Q1? Thank you.

Okay, first of all, I have to inform everybody the caller is from Goldman Sachs, Donald Lu. And Donald, your first question is about smartphones -- average silicon content of a smartphone, right?

Yes, and also high end and low end, if you can separate the two?

Yes, that's right. You want the breakdown between high end, low end and medium end? And your second question is with respect to 10-nanometers in terms of the yield as well as the projected shipment of 10-nanometer next year by quarter?

Yes.

All right, Donald. I will try to answer the first part of your question regarding the silicon content. If we look at the revenue per box on a smartphone we have seen the dollar per box actually continue to increase and 15’-16’ a slight increase. We expect the content will continue to increase in 2017 with weighted average about $10 per box -- for us. So this is especially on the high end product. That's where the increase is coming from.

So I remember the average content this year is about $8 per phone? And you've been talking about $10 next year?

This year is more than $9. Same for last year. We expect the dollar will go up to about TWD10 next year.

Got it. Thank you.

Second question was with respect to 10-nanometer, the yield. [Multiple speakers].

The 10-nanometer yield ramp -- whether it's within expectation similar to 16-nanometer or it's more challenging -- yes.

It is similar. It's similar. But of course the 10-nanometer is much tougher than the 16-nanometer FinFET as compared with one year ago.

Got it. And also you commented that you'll enter volume production. The volume product tape-out will start in early next year, Q1 next year, is that the guidance?

Yes, we start production at the end of this year but the wafer will be out in the first quarter and enter into the volume production after that.

Okay, so the volume production tape-out will start in Q4 this year?

That’s right.

Got it. Thank you.

We can have the next caller on the line operator, please.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Brett Simpson from Arete Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. My first question on 7-nanometer, can you maybe talk about how many customers are committed? I know you talked about tape-outs for next year, but how many customers in total are committed to 7-nanometer? And if you plan to convert your 10-nanometer capacity to 7-nanometer over time, do you think your peak capacity of 7-nanometer will be higher than 28?

All right, I will repeat Brett's questions. I think he's asking us about 7-nanometer first, how many customers do we have at 7-nanometers, total? And then if we will convert some capacity eventually of 10-nanometer to 7-nanometer, will we be able to generate 7-nanometer business, eventually, bigger than 28-nanometer business? Will 7-nanometer eventually [Multiple speakers].

7-nanometer wafers, yes. Wafer capacity.

And 7-nanometers in capacity?

Yeah.

Okay.

7-nanometer customer are many. I don't remember how many, but more than 20. Many of them are working on their tape-out next year as well as 2018. We expect the 7-nanometer business will be larger than 28-nanometer. Capacity wise we don't -- it could be comparable. It could be -- it really depends on the later on, when the customers' product launches, how successful they will be. But we are planning probably within -- it's comparable within the range. There's no significantly drop, capacity wise. So in that terms the business will be much bigger, in dollar sense.

That's very helpful. And second question was on the Nanjing fab in China. Is that going to be TSMC moving existing capacity from Taiwan to China or will this be incremental capacity you're adding with Nanjing?

All right, the question is with respect to our Nanjing fab. Brett is asking whether we'll be using our existing capacity from Taiwan to be used in Nanjing, or will it be incremental capacity?

The majority of the capacity we are moving from Taiwan fab to Nanjing.

Okay, thanks very much.

Okay, let's come back to the floor. Next question will be coming from Morgan Stanley's Charlie Chan.

My question is also on 7-nanometer. It sounds like customers' demand are very strong for 7-nanometer and you just mentioned that the 10-nanometer cycle time is shorter than your expectation. So is it possible you can bring in the mass production timing of 7-nanometer to circa later 2017? If your risk production in 1Q next year will is smooth? Thanks.

I hope our preparation can be ahead of schedule, which we're working on to ensure our customer, when they do the product launch they get more matured condition. However, if you're asking are we pulling the ramp, that will be affected by many factors. It depends on their product launch timing and nor do we want to produce much inventory either. So that is a business decision rather than a technical decision.

Okay, understood. And also on 7-nanometer, so do you expect customers' number or tape-out number to be more than 16-nanometer? I mean because 7-nanometer cost could be much higher than 16-nanometer. So when you communicate with your customer, how will they justify the higher cost in terms of photo mask, wafer price, IT costs, et cetera?

Right now it's hard -- what I cited that customer number really is, at this point those customers are already working with us on 7-nanometer. Okay, it's by no means the total number of customers. As any node, when technology gets matured there are many, many smaller customers or more innovative other new companies which come on board. So if you look at the 16-nanometer, they're quite a bigger number than what I tell you on 7-nanometer. But as time goes on, I believe 7-nanometer customer will continually increase. One is in addition to the mobile application, I expect high performance application VR, AR, artificial intelligence application will come -- added to our customer portfolio -- product portfolio and that is the reason we see. In one way the entry barrier is higher, so less customers can get into but the application of that technology will be wider than before. So that is what I -- what we see.

Okay. Thank you. So lastly, very quick on the third quarter revenue, I guess the question is to Lora. So I just want to clarify, do you think the revenue upside third quarter mainly coming from the 20-nanometer or 16-nanometer? Because you mentioned that the margin evolution comes from 16-nanometers so it seems to imply the upside coming from 16-nanometer in third quarter.

Actually the third quarter revenue is supported by the Smartphone growth. When I say Smartphone, it's more than 16-nanometer. Of course it includes 16-nanometer, also the companion chip that goes along to support Smartphone.

Okay, so it's Smartphone demand across different nodes?

Yes.

All right. The next question will be coming from JP Morgan's Gokul Hariharan.

My first question is on HPC. I think you provided a rough estimate of $15 billion wafer revenue in five years. Just to get some granularity on that, is that the total market demand, including IDM, fabless, everything, or does it just be foundry opportunity within that market? Because as you mentioned, some of the segments, very dominant IDM players. Some of them, like if you are a lot more fabless?

What I cited on the wafer revenue in terms of foundry revenue. But we -- many of our customer -- fabless customer wants to get into that market and any product can be foundried, by the way, okay? So we just play together in that sector. That's all. Yes.

Okay. All right. So would you say that server is still a big portion of that opportunity? Or you're not including the server opportunity which is predominantly IDM in that 15 billion.

Server is included in that opportunity.

Okay. All right. Second question is on 7-nanometer. I think you mentioned about 15 customer tape-outs already ready for next year. Are there a significant number of HPC-related tape-outs there, or the starting tape-outs are mostly high end mobile in that 7-nanometer?

There are a significant number of HPC products -- tape-outs. But in terms of volume it will be high -- mobile product volume will be much higher in the beginning.

And maybe, last one, I think you had mentioned 10-nanometer you'll have more than 70% market share. Any rough thoughts in 7-nanometer, is it going to be 90% to 95%. Any early thoughts on how you think about 7-nanometer market share?

High. We'd say high. Higher than 10-nanometer. We want to do every node is higher than the previous node.

Fair enough.

The next question will be coming from Credit Lyonnais, Sebastian Hou.

My first question is on the packaging business. So [indiscernible]. If I understand correctly that the TSMC will take full responsibility of the packaging of logic and memory and my question is how to split the yield issues of memory with the memory partner? And as this part of the business continues to grow in terms of revenue percentage and dollar amounts and how do you expect this to -- will this increase the business risk for you and how do you see that impact to your risk, yield and profitability?

To answer your question, no, we don't take full responsibility. As you said on the memory portion. Memory we will work with the memory supplier but it's mainly their responsibility to make it reliable and fully functional and can be cooperated into InFO set technology. But we don't take the full responsibility, as you just mentioned.

Okay. I think my question is -- sorry, I should have asked more clearly. So my question is, when the packaging -- for example the fail -- the yield rate is not good, but you have to be responsible for that cost including the memory cost, right?

Oh. That's a good question. Once a part fail, which we don't expect too often, of course -- once the part fail we trace it back. We work with the customer identify whose responsibility it is.

Okay. So the yield rate is -- that the yield rate problem is led by your memory partners and that cost will be attributed to them, but not you?

That’s correct.

Okay. And my second question is a very simple one. Just I noticed that your 0.11-micron and 0.13-micron revenue increased quite a lot in terms of quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year in the third quarter. Can you give us some hints and colors on what type of application and products are that? Thank you.

Okay. On 0.11-micron and 0.13-micron we, as I mentioned, we developed some specialty technologies and so I give you -- yes, the one more major reason probably is that some of the [indiscernible].

Okay.

Next question will be coming from Daiwa's Rick Hsu.

My first question is I think Lora was talking about your revenue CAGR in the next -- well, three years to five years will be 5% to 10% per annum. I wonder if you could give us some ballpark number. If I want to break it down on the incremental revenue increase across the board with your four demand drivers like you include HPC, mobile, auto and IoT, could you give us some idea the contribution from each category?

I cannot. I think Mark said last quarter in the five-year timeframe half of our growth will come from the mobile field and about a quarter for high performance computing area. And the other quarter will be from IoT. That's the ballpark I think.

All right, thank you. All right. The second question is I think this year your revenue growth is going to be pretty strong based on your 5% to 10% guidance. And that also increases the comparison base for next year. So if I want to ask for some color about your next year's growth it's going to be a 5% to 10% range, would you be -- would that be closer to the lower end or higher end?

I will not comment 2017 growth at this moment. You can just follow our indications. We still believe in the five years to 10 years compound annual growth rate will be between 5% to 10%. Of course, some year will be higher. Some year will be lower. But this is our goal -- to drive the compound growth rate 5% to 10%.

Thank you so much.

I think we will need to go the line first before we come back to the floor for the follow up question. Operator, could you please have the next caller on the line please?

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steven Pelayo from HSBC. Please go ahead.

Yes, just a couple of clarifications first. Your China revenue -- despite total Company revenue being up so much, your China revenue in dollars was down pretty significantly. It seems to happen every third quarter, but I guess I'm surprised, given some of the strength that we've seen in China smartphone. Maybe you can comment a little bit about what's going on in China, what you're seeing there and thoughts for the fourth quarter. And then the second clarification question that I had was just on gross margins. You had said that around 50% for next year. I'm curious if that's more of a full-year number or when I think about it on a quarterly basis -- can you talk a little bit about seasonality in large customers, rising depreciation? I know in the past you've smoothed it a little bit as well in the first half by starting wafers. I guess I'm worried a bit about first half next year gross margins. Can they also still be close to 50% in a seasonally soft period? Those were my two clarification questions.

Steven, you talk so fast it's even beyond me. So I really -- I haven't caught your first question quite well, but I think the second question you want us to explain about gross margins for next year, right?

Primarily during the seasonally soft period. So in the first half of the year, can your gross margins still sustain about 50% as you had suggested, I think, for the full year?

Are you asking about 2017? Okay. Yeah. 2000 --.

Correct. First half next year and a seasonally softer period, can gross margin sustain 50%?

I will not particularly comment on quarter gross margin outlook, but if you hear what I said earlier, in the longer term we intend to keep it above 50%. Of course, some quarters depending on the seasonality and utilization may swing a little bit. And we have the 10-nanometer which will be dilution to our margin as it comes on. But over and over I think 50% -- above 50% is probably good direction.

Okay, let me just jump to my last longer-term question. Midway through the third quarter one of your competitors now, Intel, seems to have rebooted their foundry effort. TSMC's been under attack many times over the years and you guys have done a great job with your scale, your tech leadership, existing relationships, your customer agnosticism, if you will. But I'm just curious is there anything different this time with some of the competitive threats out there? Are you hearing any differences from a customer perspective, or even from just a competitive perspective on pricing or incentives -- or just the general [indiscernible] that's going on right now? Any thoughts on competitive landscape this time around?

Steven, can you speak slower? Because really, the bandwidth is very narrow, so only part of the spectrum was received.

Maybe it's my [multiple speakers].

So Steven you now understand, maybe I can summarize your very long question. You are just asking, what's the impact to TSMC if Intel becomes very serious about foundry, right?

Well, they certainly have threatened in the last 90 days with a greater level of intensity. And so I'm curious if anything's different from a competitive landscape perspective this time around. In the past you have done a great job fighting off competition. Do you see anything different this time around?

We intend to do a great job going to the future too.

Okay, fair enough, guys. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you, Steven. Let's come back to the floor. Okay, follow-up question first come from Credit Suisse, Randy Abrams.

Last year there was CapEx savings where the mobile products migrated 20 to 16 and there was capacity conversion. Could you talk about the outlook for the 16 node, if you expect to backfill as some of the leading products move? Or you could see the same type of move of converting capacity from 16 down to 10 and 7. Then is it efficient to make that capacity conversion?

We build our capacity according to the demand, of course. And so the next year we expect customer move -- especially the high-end smartphone -- to move from 16 to 10. And then we expect the second wave and third wave customer to enter into 16-nanometer. So far we will convert some of the 16-nanometers capacity into 10-nanometer. We will, if the demand is not as high as it is year. And you are talking about the conversion efficiency, quite high.

Okay. So when you're saying, so your base case is no conversion; it's only on a demand disappointment that you -- like your base case is you can fill that capacity? Okay. The second question, you used to disclose IDM business every quarter. It's no longer in the quarterly, but IDM last year grew from 15% to 18%. So it's actually a reversal that IDMs grew as a percent of sales. If you could talk about that bucket, which it seemed like it continued to come down relative to fabless. But with some of the mergers like NXP-Freescale, are you seeing as a result of that any change in outsourcing or for your overall IDM business any change?

Did you say the IDM revenue growth is 18%?

Yes, in the annual time it was 18%. The year before it was 15%.

IDM?

For IDM.

IDM or Outsourcing IDM?

Well, just IDM as your percent of revenue. Like the total bucket of IDM.

I see. We -- indeed, our growth in more recent years comes from fabless, also from IDM outsourcing and from system companies. As a matter of fact, if I look at the recent history, the growth fastest is from system companies, then the IDM outsourcing then the fabless growth.

If I can add, this year the number this year will be similar to last year. Okay. Next follow-up question will be coming from Citigroup's Roland Shu.

I just have one follow-up question for your inventory level. I know your inventory is mainly from WIP and also finished goods. However, looking at this 3Q you have a 17% higher revenue compared to second quarter but your inventory has declined about 10%. Agree you said you ship off this WIP. However, in 3Q you probably have much more wafer starts also. So that actually will be turned to the WIP. So just I want to understand what is the percentage for your finished goods in your inventory? Are you -- did you ship off these finished goods to your customer in 3Q?

Simple answer is yes. We have very low finished goods inventory. If you understand our business model that's the way it should be. So majority part of our inventory is WIP. So when we're talking about cycle time it does help to reduce the inventory because you don't need to build that earlier. So you can do pretty efficiently.

Okay, so how much cycle time you have been reduced in 3Q?

Actually most of the cycle time reduction comes from the manufacturing side. I'll give you one example. I cannot nail down between the second quarter and the third quarter, but I'll tell you that last year and this year we probably improved by 20%. We shortened that cycle time.

Okay, there are follow-up questions first from Morgan Stanley's Charlie Chan.

So, Mark, a couple of weeks ago you announced that TSMC's going to kick off the 3-nanometer R&D. But that doesn't really show in your competitor’s format, not even the 5-nanometer. So what is TSMC seeing that your competitors don't see in terms of technology breakthrough or any customers demanding for that 3-nanometer? Thanks.

I'm sure our competitors are working on it. So I just have the chance last week in TSIA's annual meeting. I spelled out our 3-nanometer status. And everybody is working on it I believe. At least the top three or four. And it's still in the pathfinding mode and how to do the transistor I think everybody is searching it, it's not obvious at this point, but that is what the researching is about. So we intend to invest heavily in the much forward-looking R&D anticipating all kinds, both in the Moore's Law scaling as well as the 3D IC integration. So we intend to fulfill the future system requirement this way and to customize to fit our technology just for the future system requirement, instead of just so-called CPU cadence. Thanks.

So in your long-term revenue mix, so Lora just mentioned that the long-term your mix will be half from mobile, one quarter from HPC, one quarter from IoT. So what is it today? I mean the mix today from these three segments?

We didn't separate the revenue on the way you describe. We just have a communication -- computer, consumer, industrial standard which you can find from our management report, which a very big part is communication and the increasing important part is industrial and standard, computer getting smaller.

Okay, follow-up questions also will be coming from Credit Lyonnais, Sebastian Hou.

I have questions from -- more from the -- in terms of margin from the application perspective. So if you look at your future growth driver, smartphone, which mobile and high performance computing and automotive and IoT. So we understand mobile so far account for a large chunk of your business revenue contribution. And automotive and high performance computing right now is still relatively smaller. But I believe this part will be -- presumably this part -- these two businesses will grow faster. So in terms of the margin will these two part of the business carry higher than the other business margin? And how do you see this impact your margin? Will it bring more upside to your margin down the road?

Right. Lora just mentioned we try to keep our 50% to -- around 50% margin. Of course, the higher the better and we want to work on our value add for our customers.

Okay. And my follow-up questions on that is on your 7-nanometer because you have two variants for mobile and high performance computing platform, and do you see any margin or profitability difference between these two variants?

At this point it's too early -- too early to say. We're just working with our customers. You know the price changes year-by-year. So how it pans out is yet to be seen. I certainly hope the high performance computing margin is higher than our mobile because -- and look at Intel's margin. But we still at the same time want to enable our customer to enter that high performance computing market. And that is the consideration. At this point we do not assume major differences, but of course we work with our customer to get their margin high, therefore we benefit our margin too.

All right, finally the follow-up question will be coming from Deutsche Bank's Michael Chou.

How about the outlook by segment for Q4?

We have guided kind of flat fourth quarter. So on the segment side we expect communication and computer will grow slightly and consumer industrial will decrease. So net is flat.

Regarding the 16-nanometer market share what is your expectation for next year versus this year? Will that be similar?

It will be similar.

Thank you.

All right in that happy note we will conclude third quarter's conference and conference call. Thank you for joining us this time and I will see you next quarter.