Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the conference call to report the First Quarter 2023 Financial Results for Telesat. Our speakers today will be Dan Goldberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of Telesat; and Andrew Browne, Chief Financial Officer of Telesat. I would like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Michael Bolitho, Director of Treasury and Risk Management. Please go ahead, Mr. Bolitho.

Thank you, and good morning. This morning, we filed our annual report for Form 6-K with the SEC and on SEDAR. Our remarks today may contain forward-looking statements. There are risks that Telesat's actual results may differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of known and unknown risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of known risks, see Telesat's annual report filed earlier today with the SEC. Telesat assumes no responsibility to update or revise these forward-looking statements. I will now turn the call over to Dan Goldberg, Telesat's President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Michael. This morning, I'll share some thoughts on our financial results and give an update on the business. I'll then hand over to Andrew, who will speak to the numbers in detail and then we will open the call up to questions. It's been just six weeks since we held our call for our full year 2022 results, so we don't have that many big updates to shake. Our Q1 numbers came in consistent with our expectations. And at this time, we can reaffirm the full year guidance we gave in late March. When we released our full year results, I noticed the two biggest contributors to the decreases in revenue and adjusted EBITDA that we're forecasting this year. The first was the residual headwinds from the Anik F3 DISH renewal we secured early last year, which will show up in the first four months of this year. This we noted was an expected renewal with Bell for Nimiq 4, which comes up for renewal in early October this year. We noted that we expected Bell to renew all the DTH capacity on Nimiq 4, but at a materially lower rate than the current one, which is exactly where we've landed with Bell. That was renewed all the Nimiq 4 DTH capacity for two years, with an option to extend for another year effect in October, when the current term expires. As we noted on our last call, these two renewal -- renewals DISH and Bell account for approximately half of our anticipated revenue and adjusted EBITDA declined for the year. I also want to flag that utilization at the end of Q1 are quite high at 88% is down slightly from the 89% we had at the end of Q4. There were some changes in the fleet and Q1 and Anik F2 going into incline service. So we pull it out of the utilization calculation and Anik 4 coming into the fleet, so that goes into the utilization calculation. But those movements net, net had no real impact on utilization as a whole. We don't have any new update on Lightspeed at this time relative to what we said on the call six weeks ago. I will say that we continue to make progress with the various parties were engaged with the enthusiasm within the company and our board about the prospects of the constellation. And we remain optimistic that we're going to be able to move forward with the program, recognizing we're still not quite there yet, and it's not over till it's over. We hope to be in a position to provide greater clarity soon. Finally, as we noted in our press release this morning, we repurchased approximately US$103 million in face value of Telesat debt. Since our last call, which we believe strengthens our financial position and creates value for shareholders. So with that, I’ll hand it over to Andrew, and then look forward to taking any questions.

Thank you, Dan and good morning, everyone. I would now like to focus on highlights from this morning's press release and filings during the fourth quarter of 2023, Telesat reported revenues of $183 million adjusted EBITDA of $439 million and generated cash from operations of $63 million, with $7 billion of cash on the balance sheet. In the fourth quarter of 2023 as compared to the same period in 2022, revenues decreased by $2 million to $183 million. Operating expenses decreased by $11 million to $53 million and adjusted EBITDA decreased by $7 million to $139 million. The adjusted EBITDA margin was 75.7%, compared to 78.4% in 2022. Between 2022 and 2023, changes in the U.S. dollar rebate had a positive impact of $7 million on revenues, and negative impact of 1 million operating expenses and a positive impact of 5 million on adjusted EBITDA. But adjusted for changes in foreign exchange rates, revenues decreased by $9 million, operating expenses decreased by $12 million, and the non-cash expense related to share based compensation decreased by $15 million. The overall result was a decrease that adjusted EBITDA of $12 million. The revenue decrease was mainly due to a reduction in revenues Telesat's North American DTH customers, this was partially offset by higher equipment sales to Canadian government customers, combined with increased services provided to the air and maritime customers. The decrease in operating expenses, but this primarily due to higher non cash share based comp, incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2022. Interest expense increased by $20 million during the fourth quarter when compared to the same period in 2022. The increase was due to an increase in interest rates in the U.S. term facility, combined with the foreign exchange impact and U.S. dollar denominated interest expense. This was…

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Arun Seshadri from BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.

First, on LEO. I know there's not much of a broad update that you guys have right now. But can you say whether the -- can you provide any details in terms of whether either there's any new parties involved, discussions going on with the existing parties just continue to advance. Any additional color you can add?

Yes. Arun, it's Dan. Yes, it's true. I mean we only -- Hello? So we put out our full-year numbers, what just 6 weeks ago. So we don't have big updates. So no, the LEO discussions with the various parties are continuing. We're engaging with the parties that we've been engaging with. I think we're making headway. But yes, I'd say that's kind of where things said.

And then in terms of the IRIS 2 European project, is there any way -- are you guys -- can you talk whether you're bidding -- you're one of the bidders there at all? Or just any other sort of -- any details on that front?

We're not a bidder. I mean the EU has been, I think, pretty clear that they're really focused on working with EU companies in that process. We've been tracking it. And my own guess is it will continue to evolve. We saw the consortium that's come together. We pay attention to what the EU is saying in terms of what their objectives are in their time frames and whatnot. We certainly think that with our activities with Lightspeed that there are things that we could offer in connection with the project that would be very beneficial. But at this point in time, we're more just sort of tracking it and will kind of evaluate whether there's a good opportunity for us to participate at some point. But at this point, we're really just kind of on the sidelines.

And is there any -- are there any -- can you talk about sort of what sort of things you could provide theoretically that could be beneficial to that project?

Well, I mean, certainly, one of the things they're focused on is deploying a LEO constellation and we're deploying LEO Constellation, 2. And so there would be potentials in terms of working with a similar supply chain and leveraging kind of volume synergies depending on an openness, our fleet could be used to complement backstop, expand whatever constellation they ultimately deploy. It just kind of those sorts of things, but there are already a lot of parties participating in the effort. And so yes, I think right now, we're just trying to monitor how it's developing. And if there's a good opportunity for us to be a constructive participant, yes, we'd definitely be open to that.

And then one last question for me is just more in terms of the buybacks between the various securities. I assume primarily liquidity has driven the choice in terms of which securities to buy back?

I mean, we -- some of these securities are more liquid than others. And yes, so we just kind of have to be opportunistic in terms of what we can do out there, and I think what we've been doing is as I said in my remarks, it accretes value to the equity and strengthens our financial position kind of more broadly, but that's exactly right.

Are you able to buy back bank debt according to your read of the indentures -- I mean, sorry, of the credit agreement?

I'm no -- I'm no securities lawyer, but my General Counsel is nodding yes. So yes, I think that we're able to do that.

The next question is from Marcello Chermisqui from Ares. Please go ahead.

Can you provide us like what the latest update is on the cost to build Lightspeed? I know a year ago, you were saying around $5.5 billion. But since then, there's been some more inflationary pressures. And I guess, one -- and what's the earliest you can get all 188 satellites launch and activate it if you theoretically secured the remaining financing tomorrow?

Yes. Thanks, Marcello. The -- we're not seeing at this time, incremental inflationary pressures that have us alter the way we're thinking about the total cost. And as we've sort of been providing indications around that for gosh, I don't know, roughly the last 9 months or so. And then in terms of when we could get going. My recollection is, I think maybe we start launching in 2026 sort of that kind of time frame. So -- but we'll certainly provide detailed updates when we're financed and get going on the program.

Could you provide like any update on supplier conversation? Do you think there's an opportunity to potentially switch to alternative vendors to reduce costs? Or at this point, are you switching costs too high with these suppliers?

We've always said that we are working closely with Thales as our prime contractor, and they've got a really good track record, I think, in terms of building constellations and the like. Equally, we've said that we're not bound to Thales. And we have, as you would expect, continue to think about alternative ways that we could deploy our constellation in a way that allows us to meet all of our objectives. So that's certainly something that we continue to evaluate and whether switching costs are prohibitive or whatnot, that's something that we would take into account. But it's certainly an opportunity that exists for Telesat and certainly something that we're -- that we've evaluated over time to make sure that we have some optionality there.

And I saw in the 10-Q release that Erwin Hudson is retiring next month. So who's going to be running Lightspeed? And do you think there's any impact to the project?

We have an embarrassment of riches in terms of super smart, capable, experienced technical people at Telesat. I think it's one of the great strengths of Telesat. Erwin is a total rock star and has been a great colleague and has provided great leadership. He actually has stayed on quite for some time longer than we had anticipated, I should say, than he had anticipated. And I think that Iran will continue to -- I mean, Erwin's retiring. He's not going anywhere else. And I suspect that Erwin will continue to consult with on Lightspeed going forward. So yes, we've got a great technical team here. Erwin's been a great part of it. But we -- it's not something that is a concern in terms of our ability to move forward with the program.

And lastly for me, in terms of the royalty payments that the GEO business pays the LEO business per year for use of the IP and other assets, is that the $2.5 million of revenue you reported in the LEO business in the first quarter? Or how does that royalty payment work?

I'm looking at my colleagues around the table here. Does anyone want to take that? Paul?

So the payments between the LEO and GEO are for shared resources basis is not a royalty payment. Revenues usually come from the U.S. government services is what you're seeing.

On the LEO side.

On the LEO side.

That was Paul Firkins, our Controller

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Brandon Karsch from Kennedy Lewis. Please go ahead.

Good to hear that you got that Bell renewal done, and I heard the commentary that, that DISH, or about half of the revenue decline this year, but with a lot of moving pieces here. Can you just maybe help us get a better sense of what the full-year annual run rate is of this sell renewal?

Gosh, I think we've provided more insight than your average company about what it would be. There actually aren't that many moving pieces. I think we said on our last call that for the revenue decline, I should say, the forecast revenue decline 2023 versus 2022 that Bell and DISH account for about half of that. The DARPA contract that we recognized, I think it was Q4 last year, accounts for roughly another, I don't know, 1/4 of the anticipated revenue decline, and then the rest would just be a bunch of more cats and dogs stuff, lower renewals and by lower renewals, I mean maybe renewing a contract at a lower rate, that sort of thing. So I think that gives you a lot to work with and providing more than that just starts to -- I don't know, we're starting to share just too much proprietary information on a public call like this. So I think you can kind of work it out or close enough.

Maybe I'll take this offline. And then with the Shaw Rogers transaction closing, any updated thoughts on how that might impact the relationship with Shaw, if at all?

We've known Canada is a big country, but in some ways, it's kind of a small one. We've worked with both Shaw and Rogers a lot over the years that we've done a whole lot more business with Shaw just because they had the DTH platform. I think we've said on prior calls, Shaw, I'm sorry, Rogers doesn't have a competitive DTH platform. And I think they've highlighted the fact that the Shaw platform gives them this kind of national reach is something that they regard it as a positive. So we don't believe that our kind of outlook with Shaw and those business activities are adversely impacted by the fact that Rogers is now kind of taken over Shaw.

And are you able to share when that renewal would come up?

I think you can probably tell, I mean, it's mostly tied to the -- and Shaw's on a couple of our satellites. So Anik F2, Anik G1. So you can sort -- and they're mostly kind of end of life on both of those satellites. So for Anik F2 , that will put you out in the 2024, 2025 kind of ZIP code, and for G1 much longer still.

This concludes today's question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the meeting back over to Mr. Goldberg.

Okay. Well, operator, thank you, and thank you all for participating this morning. Again, it wasn't a whole lot of time that had elapsed since we held our last call. So we look forward to speaking with you again when we release our Q2 numbers. So thank you very much.

The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.