Mike Tschiderer
Analyst · Neuberger Berman. Please proceed with your question
Thanks, Lee, and good morning, everyone. Please note that when considering our year-over-year comparisons that the second quarter of our fiscal year 2017 that ends at March 25th, 2017 and the six month year-to-date results include the acquisitions of Anmar Meteorology in September of 2015, Spectrum Technology in January of 2016, Dispersion based on Montreal that was January of 2016 and Excalibur Engineering, which was acquired at the beginning of this fiscal year on April 1st. I will be referring to some of the slides that we posted on our website throughout this discussion. Starting on slide four. Our record quarter was driven by a significant growth in revenue in both segments. Service segment revenue was up 19% to a second quarter record of $16.9 million, which includes the acquisition related growth. On a trailing 12-month basis, which we believe is more indicative of a long-term progress of the service segment, revenue was up nearly 20%. As Lee mentioned, we are encouraged by the results of the distribution segment this quarter. Sales increased 15% over the prior year second quarter, more supported by incremental sales from Excalibur, the expansion of the high emerging rental businesses both Transcat’s and Excalibur’s and strong orders from the alternative energy markets. On slide five, consolidated operating income increased 15% to $1.6 million, while operating margins were flat. We expect operating margins in both segments to increase as we continue to integrate our recent acquisitions and get the expected sales and cost synergies. Service segment gross and operating margins negatively affected by softness in our Canadian markets and lower than desired U.S. organic revenue, as Lee described. The operating margin in service also reflects an increased allocation of general and administrative costs of approximately $130,000 and higher selling costs in the quarter. We allocate our G&A cost based on a consistent methodology that uses prior year segment revenue percentage as the allocation basis. Each quarter in fiscal 2017, we’ll have approximately $130,000 to $140,000 more G&A expense allocated to the service segment then was allocated to that segment in fiscal 2016. This will also give the distribution segment favorable comparisons each quarter by the same amounts. There is no impact on consolidated results from this cost allocation. Distribution margins expanded with segment gross margin up 80 basis points to 22.2% and operating margin up 100 basis points to 4.5%. In distribution, we benefited from higher revenue, more favorable customer mix, including the higher margin rental equipment sales and from the reduced allocation of G&A costs, that I just described above. On slide six, we talk about adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin. We use adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure, because we believe it is a good gauge of performance in as a measure of operating cash flow for each of our segments. I do encourage you to look at the reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to the closest GAAP measures that we have provided, which are operating income and net income. Adjusted EBITDA growth was strong for both segments in the quarter. For service, it increased 25% to $2 million and as a percentage of segment sales, it was 11.9%, up 60 basis points. In distribution segment, adjusted EBITDA was $1.3 million, up 64% and as a percentage of that segment sales, it improved 230 basis points to 7.4%. Going to slide seven. On slide seven, higher revenue was somewhat offset by incremental expenses that we’ve mentioned previously here. And as a result, second quarter net income increased 2% to about $900,000. Diluted earnings per share were consistent at $0.12 per share. We continue to expect our tax rate to range between 34% and 36% in fiscal 2017. Slide eight provides a detail, regarding the strength and flexibility of our balance sheet. We do generate strong cash from operations, and as you can see compared with the capital spending on the slide, we deliver free cash flow. Our trailing ROIC or return on invested capital was 7.9%. For us, ROIC uses the trailing 12-month operating income after taxes or no path divided by the trailing 12-month invested capital, with invested capital being the sum of our total debt in our total equity. We continue to be disciplined in our capital deployment with the objective to consistently generate returns in excess of our cost of capital. ROIC is a non-GAAP calculation. You should not consider this information in isolation or as a result for the results or as a substitute results prepared in accordance with GAAP CapEx was $2.5 million year-to-date, that was primarily for assets for our rental business to expand our service segment capabilities and for IT maintenance and IT growth. We continue to expect our fiscal 2017 capital expenditures to be between $5 million and $5.5 million for the year. During the quarter, we paid down $2.5 million in debt. At the end of the second quarter, we had $15.6 million of availability under our revolving credit facility and had approximately $24 million in total outstanding borrowings. We continue to believe that we have ample of cash for operations and have dry powder for any acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria. With that, I’ll turn it back to Lee.