Stephane Bello
Analyst · Drew McReynolds. Your line is open
Thank you Jim and good morning or good afternoon to all of you joining us today. As we move into the new year we have changed a bit the format for this portion of our quarterly reporting. Hopefully you will find the new format more crisp and more relevant but as we always do we welcome your input and feedback to ensure that what we present is helpful to you. So we start by providing some color on the revenue performance of our three core segments and then I will also provide details around recurring and transaction revenues in a moment. As a reminder I will talk to revenue growth before currency and on an organic basis. So organic revenue growth for the three core segments was 6% for the quarter and 5% for the year. Legal professionals revenues increased 4% during the fourth quarter with organic revenues also at 4%. Law firm’s revenues grew healthy 4 %, government related revenues had another strong quarter with 9% growth and our global Legal businesses were flat on a reported basis but up 4% organically. Westlaw Edge continues to yield a healthy premium with strong sales momentum as evidenced by the months of December being the best sales month since the launch. Edge contributed over 100 basis points to the legal segments growth rate in 2019 and as Jim previously mentioned the legal market remains healthy. According to Peer Manager, demand growth in the U.S. legal market in Q4 was at 1.1% which was slightly better than the full-year. Rates for hours worked increased a 4% in Q4 which was the highest increase recorded by Peer Manager and lawyer growth in Q4 was 2.4% the highest quarterly gain since the fourth quarter of 2011. So we continue to remain confident with regard to the trajectory of the Legal segment for 2020. In our Corporate segment revenues were at 5% with organic revenues also at 5% driven by both our Legal and tax solutions. And finally, tax and accounting had a very strong quarter as revenues grew 12% organically. Now that strong fourth quarter growth was partly due to a timing benefit as we were able to accelerate the release of some of our UltraTax state-backed software from January to December in order to more closely align with a traditional December release of a federal software. This change allowed customers earlier access to the documents to start the annual tax filing work. Now this change will result in a lower growth rate for Tax and Accounting segments in the first quarter which will likely be in the low single-digit area but is purely timing related and we expect the growth rate for Tax & Accounting to quickly rebound to the 6% to 8% range for the balance of the year. And importantly the normalized growth rate for tax professionals if you adjust for that UltraTax change was also very strong as it stood at 7% for the quarter and 6% for the full year. Now on a final and important note, our Tax & Accounting business sold its government business also known as Momentum in November of last year and as many of you will remember that business added a fair level of volatility from one quarter to the other and it generated about $40 million in annual revenues. Now before turning to the remaining segments let's look closer at recurring and transactions revenue results for the year. Starting on the left of the slide total organic revenue growth was 4% for the full year which represents an improvement of a 100 basis points for 2018. As shown, this was driven by all three of our core businesses. Overall, most recurring and transaction organic revenues contributed to the 120 basis points improvement which is reflected on the right hand side of the slide. Starting at the top, recurring revenues grew 85 basis points to just under 5.5%. The improvement was driven by legal and was especially evident in Tax & Accounting which was partially impacted by UltraTax software release previously mentioned. Turning to the graph from the bottom right of the slide, transactions revenues were about flat year-over-year which was an improvement of about 120 basis points. This improvement was most evident in our corporate segments with Legal slightly worse than the prior year. Now moving to Reuters News, revenue growth in Q4 was no longer distorted by the Refinitiv license. Revenues in the fourth quarter grew 5% and declined 1% organically due to some timing factors. The acquisition of FCBI which is now rebranded as Reuters Event explains a difference between fuller growth and organic growth in the fourth quarter. And lastly, as Jim mentioned Global Print revenues declined 4% over the prior year with organic revenues also down 4%. As we said all year we're very pleased with the global print performance which is driven by improved sales growth and steady retention. So in aggregate and on the consolidated basis, fourth quarter revenues were 4% with organic revenues also growing 4%. Turning to our profitability performance in the fourth quarter, adjusted EBITDA for the three core segments was $453 million, up 7% due to higher revenues and despite the diluted impact of our recent acquisitions. The legal professionals EBITDA margin in the fourth quarter declined 190 basis points to 34.9% compared to the prior year due to the impact of acquisitions and also to the timing of expenses during the quarter. For the full-year, EBITDA margin was up 280 basis points reflecting revenue flow for an efficiency savings. Corporates EBITDA margin increased 460 basis points to 31.1% during the quarter and this was primarily driven by revenue growth, productivity savings and currency and was somewhat offset by the impact of recent acquisitions. And finally, Tax & Accounting EBITDA margin increased 170 basis points to 49.1% due to the strong revenue growth recorded during the quarter. Moving towards News, EBITDA was $4 million which was $2 million less than the prior year period due to higher costs and investments. As mentioned by Frank earlier, we had occasion adjustments we are implementing in 2020, we primarily benefit worse and we expect that its annual EBITDA margin will be in the low-teens going forward compared to the 6% margin we reported in 2019. Global Print’s EBITDA margin for the quarter declined by about 300 basis points due to the decline in revenues but it remained strong at just under 40%. So in aggregate, reported adjusted EBITDA was nearly $400 million, up 44% due to high revenues and lower stranded and one-time cost in the quarter and despite the dilutive impact of our recent acquisitions. Now, this next slide provides a bit more color on the various factors impacting full-year 2019 reported adjusted EBITDA margin and then excludes the impact of both one-time costs in order to provide you with a better understanding of the underlined trajectory of our adjusted EBITDA margin and the path we see to achieve the 31.5% to 32% margin target which Jim just discussed. As you can see on this slide, our reported 2019 full-year EBITDA margin was 25.3%. There were several factors that distorted that margin. First, strength in one-time cost related to the Refinitiv separation at about a 630 basis points negative impact, likely more than was the case in 2018. In addition, the Refinitiv payment to Reuters News had a negative impact of a 120 basis points on the margin. Third, M&A activity negatively impacted margin by about 40 basis points and we continue to have a dilutive impact to margin in 2020. And conversely, IFRS 16 had a positive 70 basis points impact and currency added 60 basis points. By factoring all these items, revenue flow through and efficiency initiatives added about a 100 basis points. In summary, if you exclude strength in one-time cost, the full-year underlying margin would have been 31.5% which represented an 80 basis points improvement for 2018. And this is the base from which we will build towards a 31.5% to 32% margin target for 2020 even though there will be no further impact from either one-time cost or stranded costs, the Refinitiv news license or IFRS 16. So 2020 should be a much more normal year from a margin perspective. As Jim mentioned, we want to preserve the flexibility to make the necessary investments in 2020 in order to ensure that we are well positioned for 2021 from an organic growth perspective. In addition, the four acquisitions we made last year are projected to deliver a combined margin at about 18% in 2020. So they will contribute -- they will continue to be diluted to our overall margin by about 50 basis points for another year. So in conclusion, we believe we have a good visibility overall into the levers at our disposals to achieve the 2020 margin target. With that, let me turn to our earnings per share and free cash flow performance and I'll also update you on corporate results and capital structure. Starting with earnings per share, adjusted EPS increased by $0.18, $0.37 per share during the fourth quarter. That increase was driven by higher adjusted EBITDA and lower income taxes offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization as well as interest expense. For effective tax rate for the full-year ended lower than we had anticipated primarily as a result of the late change by the U.S. treasury department in the interpretation of the recent U.S. tax reform. We do not expect this favorable development to reoccur in 2020, and as a result we expect our tax rate to range somewhere between 17% and 19% in 2020. Finally, currency at a $0.01 positive impact on EPS in the quarter. And for the full-year, EPS increased $0.54 to a $1.29 due primarily to higher EBITDA and fewer common shares outstanding. Let me now turn to our free cash flow performance for the year. Our reported free cash flow was $159 million, very much in line with the guidance we have provided earlier. For perspective, we generated about[ a billion one] in 2018. So last year's performance were presented a decline up nearly $950 million. Consistent with what we did in prior quarters, this slide will hopefully help you to remove the distorting factors impacting free cash flow during the full-year. Working from the bottom of the page upwards, the Refinitiv related component of our free cash flow was down slightly more than $900 million from the prior year and that was primarily due to Refinitiv no longer being included in our results. Also in the year, we made a pension contribution and audit payments totaling $746 million, primarily related to the Refinitiv transaction with Blackstone. So if you [adjust] for these items, comparable free cash flow from continuing operations was just under $1.1 billion, an improvement or nearly $400 million over the prior year period, primarily due to the stronger EBITDA performance before stranded and one-time cost and also due to lower interest expense. Now this next slide should be our last and final slide this for Corporate costs. Given that we largely completed the one-time and stranded costs spending related to the Refinitiv transaction. Spend during the fourth quarter was about a $160 million largely in line with our expectations. For the full-year, total Corporate costs were $564 million which was also broadly in line with our target of about $570 million. And finally, given that we don’t expect to record any further one-time cost related to the Refinitiv transaction in 2020, we continue to project corporate cost to range somewhere between $140 million and $150 million this coming year. A quick update on our capital structure. As we have pretty decent share, we remain committed to maintaining a stable and robust capital structure. At year-end 2019, our capital structure remains very strong. We ended the year with $3.4 billion of debt outstanding. We also had $800 million of cash on hand at year-end, so our net-debt position was about $2.8 billion including lease liabilities. This translated into a net-debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.9 times which was below our 2.5 times target. The average maturity on a remaining long-term debt outstanding is 10-years and our average interest rate is 4.6% and thoroughly fixed. Last but not least, we had about 500 million shares outstanding at year-end. As we had previously disclosed, our objective remains to buyback enough shares each year to offset new share issuances associated with the dividend reinvestment plan and with our equity incentive plans. With a target of maintaining our outstanding shares at around 500 million. Now a quick update on our investment in Refinitiv. The agreement to sell Refinitiv to the London Stock Exchange group in a transaction originally valued at $27 billion is expected to close in the second half of 2020. When that transaction closes, TRI is expected to indirectly own approximately 82.5 million in the LSE or about 15% of the shares outstanding. Subject to some exceptions agreed to with LSE, there will be a 2-year post closing lockup for TR and Blackstone which we restrict any immediate set down of our respective states. 1/3rd of each party shares can be sold in year three and four after the closing and the lockup we terminate on the fourth anniversary of the closing. While we expect that the LSE transaction will be predominantly tax defers for TR, we are expecting that a portion of the capital gain taxes will become payable when deal closes in the second half of this year. And we intend to fund this tax liability by either sending down some of our LSE shares as permitted under the lockup agreement and or via other means. So we do not expect this to constrain us our liquidity perspective. Our future equity interest in LSE we represent a store value which can be monetized overtime. We believe that this will provide significant financial flexibility for foreseeable future. Now as of February 24, our stake was worth about $8.9 billion pretax versus just under $3 billion at the time of the original transaction. After the deal closes, we expect to receive regular dividends from the LSEG estimated at about $60 million per year based on the company's current annual dividends per share. Now before I turn this over to Mike, I would just like to say how much I appreciated the supporting advise that many of you on this call is providing to him and myself since the time we became [indiscernible] back in the late 2011. As many of you may recall, we both needed a lot of help and advice as we jump into our respective roles. I did have a great uncertainty for the company and with a limited level of transition planning. Many of you not only gave us the benefit of the doubt, you also were always there to provide advice and guidance when we asked for it. So, it should come as no surprise that many of the key financial metrics we used today or [posed] to drive performance internally and to govern our incentive plans. Many of these metrics such as free cash flow per share came directly out of conversations we have with many of you about what really matters to investors. You really have this more than you can imagine, especially during this early days and I would really like to thank you or hardly for order support has an indication you provided to us. Now as I turn the CFO role over to Mike, I could not think of a better executive to succeed me at this point. Mike and I have been working closely for the last four years and we've been working hand in glove for the last 18 months. As a CFO, I have never been let down by Mike. He's someone who always under promise and over delivers on his commitment and was an extraordinarily strong commercial entrepreneuring acumen. Many of you already know him as he participated in a number of investors event over the last couple of years. If you can simply provide him with the same level of support and advise you gave to me over the years, I know that he will appreciate it and rely on it very much just as I did. With that, let me turn it over to Mike with outline for 2020 expectations. Thanks.