If you don't mind, there was a couple of things that I wasn't asked -- expected to be asked and -- but I'd like to address anyway. We have a series of rules and policies that we live by, especially as a public company. We have a fiduciary obligation to our shareholders and other stakeholders, and we take it really seriously. So, we create these rules. We create these policies. And some of them are just zero tolerance policies, which means that if you violate the policy, if you violate the rule, then it doesn't matter whether it was intentional. It doesn't matter if it was a mistake. Zero tolerance means that if you violate it and we have to terminate you, it's not something that we are proud of doing, but the fact that we're a company that takes integrity to be one of the most important things that we could provide to our stakeholders, to our shareholders, by holding to these kinds of policies or rules or regulations and enforcing them the way that we do. It's for the protection of the company and our shareholders. So, I'm bringing this up, because we're frankly getting inundated by requests to our investor relations firm and emails and text messages, social media posts, and I want them to address it directly. We had two people in our organization, two people that we valued that violated one of our policies. It wasn't insider trading which I see people talking about in the sense that they had access to inside information material, inside information, which neither of them did, and then went and traded the stock on the basis of that information. That wasn't what happened. We have a rule that we call a blackout period, and that means that you cannot trade the stock. I don't care where you are in the organization at what level, what your role is. It's a very hard and fast rule. During the blackout periods, you cannot trade the stock. We had unfortunately two people in partnership to show that. I'm not sure what that is. But what I'm -- let me finish my thought here. We had a couple of people that traded the stock during that period of time. I don't believe it was intentional. I'm sure that they should have been aware of the policy, they violated and they were terminated and that's it. That's all there was to it. The company is -- has moved on. We had fortunately procedures in place to -- that no one was -- the loss of any one particular, even a group of people would not impact on business. That's just the way we structure our company. So, end of story. And I hope that our shareholders and other stakeholders recognize that we're here as guardians of your investment. And these policies are important and unfortunately, when they were forced, these are the results.