Good day, everyone. Welcome to today's Teekay Tankers Limited First Quarter 2020 Earnings Results Conference. During the call, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, you will be invited to participate in a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time I'd like to turn things over to the company.

Before Kevin begins, I'd like to direct all participants to our website at www.teekaytankers.com, where you'll find a copy of the first quarter 2020 earnings presentation. Kevin and Stewart will review this presentation during today's conference call. Please allow me to remind you that, our discussion today contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from results projected by those forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the first quarter 2020 earnings release and earnings presentation available on our website. I will now turn the call over to Kevin Mackay, Teekay Tankers' President and CEO to begin.

Thank you, Ryan. Hello, everyone. Thank you very much for joining us today for Teekay Tankers First Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call, and I hope that you and your families are all safe and healthy. Joining me on the call today are Stewart Andrade, Teekay Tankers', CFO; and Christian Waldegrave Director of Research for Teekay Tankers. Before we review our results, I would like to say thank you to all of our seafarers and shore-based staff for their extraordinary efforts in continuing to bring energy to the world with Teekay spirit. While COVID-19 is having an unprecedented impact on the world and is clearly a major focus for us, we are truly proud of how our seafarers and onshore colleagues have responded to COVID-19, implementing new standards, which focus on the health and well-being of everyone involved in our organization, especially our colleagues at sea, while maintaining consistently safe and efficient operations for our customers. Additionally, we are fortunate that the tanker market and our financial results have been strong so far in 2020 and we have had minimal impact on our operations related to COVID-19. Moving to our recent highlights on slide 3 of the presentation. Teekay Tankers generated total adjusted EBITDA of approximately $155 million, during the first quarter, an increase of 17% and 145% from the fourth quarter of 2019, and the first quarter of 2019 respectively. We reported adjusted net income of $110 million or $3.27 per share in the first quarter, up from an adjusted net income of $83 million, or $2.47 per share in the fourth quarter of 2019 and $15 million or $0.44 per share in the first quarter of 2019. Teekay Tankers' first quarter earnings per share was the highest in more than 10 years resulting in an industry-leading 20% earnings per…

Thanks Kevin. Turning to slide 9, we highlight our continued focus on increasing financial strength. Since the end of Q3 2019 utilizing very strong cash flows from operations and proceeds from asset sales, we have transformed our balance sheet reducing net debt by approximately $270 million or 27% and increasing our liquidity position by almost 4 times to $368 million. In fact in Q1 alone, we reduced our debt by approximately $200 million or over 20% and more than doubled our liquidity position. I'm pleased to report that the strong cash flows achieved in April further reduced our net debt by approximately $60 million and increased our liquidity position to $420 million. In addition the 13 fixed rate contracts that Kevin touched on earlier have lowered our cash breakevens by over $4000 per day for the next 12 months further increasing our resilience to potential medium-term market weakness. With the reduction in net debt, our strong liquidity position and no significant debt maturities until 2024 as shown on slide 13 in the appendix to the presentation, we continue to increase our financial strength and flexibility. Turning to slide 10, we discuss how Teekay Tankers continues to create value for shareholders by generating significant free cash flow. Starting with the graph on the left side of the page, TNK's free cash flow increased from a very high $102 million in Q4, 2019 to $141 million in the first quarter of 2020 for a total of over $240 million in just two quarters. To put TNK's free cash flow during the first quarter into perspective, on an annualized basis it equates to a free cash flow yield of approximately 100% based on our closing share price yesterday of $16.05. Referring to the graph on the right side, TNK continues to maintain significant operating leverage with approximately 80% of spot exposure over the next 12 months while reducing its free cash flow breakeven by locking in time charters at significantly higher rates. TNK is expected to generate strong free cash flow in the second quarter and generate positive free cash flow at average midsized tanker spot rates above approximately $10,500 per day. Therefore we expect to continue creating shareholder value through positive free cash flow in almost any tanker market. With that, I will now turn the call over to Kevin to conclude.

Thanks Stewart. Turning to slide 11, this is a familiar slide which summarizes our strategic priorities for 2020 that we laid out at our Investor Day last November. I'm proud of our team for continuing to execute on these priorities, despite the unprecedented global events we are currently experiencing. We capitalized on the strong market with the majority of our fleet trading spot, while opportunistically fixing out 13 vessels on time charter at the peaks of the time charter market. Financially, we have bolstered our balance sheet with significant delevering and building a robust liquidity position. Despite, the majority of our employees working from home and facing logistical challenges related to crew changes, we were able to complete three vessel sales and the sale of the non-U.S. ship-to-ship transfer business. Lastly, we believe Teekay Tankers made the right choice in switching to low-sulfur fuels which was a seamless low-cost transition compared to others that invested in scrubbers or speculated on fuel spreads incurring additional CapEx debt or losses. Our focus on debt reduction creates shareholder value directly through increased net asset value and also increases financial flexibility and resilience which is important in all tanker markets. With a low free cash flow breakeven, a strong liquidity position, lower balance sheet leverage, no significant debt maturities until 2024 and our midsized fleet profile, we believe that Teekay Tankers continues to be one of the best positioned companies in our sector to continue creating shareholder value over the long term. With that operator, we are now available to take questions.

[Operator Instructions] We'll hear first today from Jon Chappell with Evercore.

Thank you. Good morning Kevin, Stewart and Ryan. Pretty clear presentation on executing the strategy. So I just wanted to focus on the capital structure. Obviously, the net debt is trending down pretty significantly. Net debt is always settled in cash. So can you talk about the ability to repay debt quicker than the amortization schedule and especially, as it relates to your leases? I think you gave in the Investor Day, back in November, some time frame on when you can start to prepay leases. They're obviously the most expensive debt. When can we start to see some of that cash flow trimming away the most expensive debt in the capital structure?

Hi, Jon. Thanks for the question. So as you can see on the balance sheet, we have approximately $200 million in cash and cash equivalents at the moment, which is more than we typically have on the balance sheet. Our first purchase option on the more expensive leases came up in Q1 of this year and those came up right at the beginning or the outset of the COVID pandemic. And we decided to be a bit more conservative and not exercise those initial options, just as we saw how things played out. Those options do come up annually on the first set and we have another set of options which come up in Q4 this year. So as we -- if the market stabilizes and things are looking a little more certain, we would expect to exercise those purchase options toward the end of the year, as we had initially planned and then also look to exercise further options into next year. So just for order of magnitude, the options coming up in Q4 that we can exercise have a balance of approximately $60 million and the ones into next year of about $140 million. So that's significant amount of more expensive debt that we can pay down.

Okay. And then just in the meantime then, understanding that that's six months away, likely at the earliest, could you pay down bank debt, or do you just keep the cash on the balance sheet, given the uncertainty in the market and then kind of save your firepower for when the mid to high single-digit debt comes due?

Yes. With how things have gone over the last couple of months and how the bank market's looking, we anticipate that we will reduce those cash balances and pay down some of our revolver debt in the meantime. So I would expect to see those balances come down by the end of Q2.

Okay. That’s really all I had. Good to have you executing on safety.

Yes. Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Jon.

We'll hear next from Ken Hoexter with Bank of America.

Hey, good afternoon, Kevin, Stewart and Ryan. Can you maybe just go through -- I know you talked a bit about at the Analyst Day, but what gets you to lock in more, or do you want to stay spot in the kind of market, where you get some of these extreme moves on pricing? Do you kind of want to keep playing those bounces, or do you say -- I know you did the 13, but would you look to lock in more if we got another tightening in the market?

Yes. I think, I've described this, as you said, at Investor Day. It is opportunistic and it's also a balance between where we think the forward revenue is going to look like versus locking in an opportunity as we see it. So if we do get another spike, which is possible, over the next few weeks and months, yes. If the right opportunity comes along at rates that we believe are worth locking in for six months, one year, two years, you may see us execute on some more certainly. We don't have a fixed percentage in terms of what we want to do in the spot market. It's something that we evaluate on a continuous basis, as the world evolves and especially during this time when -- from week-to-week the picture can be materially different.

Thanks, Ken. And given how rates have started to decline and rapidly so the last few weeks, what are your thoughts here, obviously, given the oversupply and the pullback from -- and just general demand from COVID? But now as the world starts to open up again what -- how do you look at -- what's your thoughts as we move forward here on the demand side of the equation, maybe chewing up some of that excess capacity that's out there now? And then, relating to your thoughts on rates?

Well, I think, overall, as I said in my prepared remarks, it is a very highly uncertain environment that we're trying to operate in at this point in time. And, although, we have seen some weakness come into the market, it is off unprecedented highs. We're sitting here in late May and my Aframaxes in Asia are still making over $30,000 a day, which relative to most Mays is a pretty healthy market. But I think going forward, as we said, we do anticipate a period of destocking. But at the same time we also have the question around floating storage. As I think one of our slide we show there the previous periods of floating storage. It's not necessarily something that's going to unwind overnight. And if it does take longer to unwind that is something that could be very supportive to the tanker demand. So our view on where the spot market goes to be honest today is uncertain. We were watching a lot of different variables in a very confusing market ranging from what the floating storage situation is where -- which economies around the world are coming back and how strongly. I think at a 50,000 foot level if we look towards China and see how quickly their demand has ramped back up in transportation fuels and just general oil demand I think if the rest of the world can follow that pattern it bodes quite well for the future. But we'll have to see and we'll take it day by day.

Great. And one more, I guess, on the process and asset sales given you were able to get that done in the quarter. Was that something you've seen a lot of activity or interest in acquiring vessels? Was that more just storage and kind of a significant demand need? Maybe you could just walk us through that process to understand how quickly the market has developed for acquisitions. Or was that just looking to capitalize on an opportunity?

No. I think the S&P market has really sort of been two-tiered over the last six months to nine months. I think as we entered the fourth quarter last year fundamentals across the tanker space were improving quite rapidly and that was being reflected in an uptick in the spot market, which was helped by the COSCO situation. So I think the demand on the S&P side for assets early in this recent cycle has been driven basically on strong supply/demand fundamentals for tankers generally. I think as we've moved into the COVID era as I call it from, sort of, February onwards, the demand for assets has really been around taking advantage of the current spot market and potentially the time charter market. Where we stand today I think the -- it has gone relatively quieter in some segments and some age classes. We're still getting inquiry for some of our older units and it's something that we will continue to look at in relation to where we see the market moving or whether the pricing that we're being offered is worth taking that asset off the table.

Wonderful. And if I can just throw one more in. Kevin in your past experience, how long does the storage take to unwind? You kind of threw out before that it depends on this -- if it's not going to unwind overnight, but if it might take longer that's supportive. Is it just based on whatever those individuals were signing whether it was six months nine months a year, or is there kind of a trend that you've seen based on your past experience?

No. I think every market is different every trader is different and every deal that a trader has done is different. It's important to understand though that while today's contango doesn't support floating storage over the long-term a lot of the deals that were done early in this process when oil prices were far cheaper than where they are today are well in the money. And how long that takes to unwind will depend on how far a particular trader may want to hold that position. So I think that's why it's important to understand that because today's contango is no longer supportive, it doesn't mean that floating storage is going to go away overnight. I think the point to take away is that we don't know and we'll have to see how it plays out. But we wouldn't be surprised, if it were to linger for a while and possibly return if oil prices do come off and we get contango back again.

It is surprising how quick they've jumped up. Appreciate, Kevin. Thank you.

Thanks, Ken.

We'll hear next from Omar Nokta with Clarksons Platou Securities.

Hi, guys. Thank you. Kevin you addressed this already in response to Ken's questions but I wanted to follow up on the idea of further ship sales. Last year you had outlined the strategy of focusing on deleveraging and a big piece of that was going to be also selling older assets. Am I kind of gleaning from your comments that the – especially with the liquidity position, as it is the cash position that asset sales right now are more of an option but it's not something you're focusing on going forward?

Well, we've always said we were going to look at asset sales opportunistically. And I think selling assets into a stronger market, sometimes it makes a lot of sense, if you're getting the right price and sometimes it doesn't. We felt that taking some of the older units off when we did was the prudent decision. But going forward, we don't have a set plan that we've got to get rid of five more or three more. It's a lot about what we can see being offered in the market and comparing that against where we think that asset will earn over the remaining life that we have of that ship in the company. So I think the – our liquidity position and our strength in our balance sheet is extremely nice to have and it has transformed the company and it will help in the way we look at things. But I think our S&P strategy will continue to be opportunistic and depend on pricing.

Yes, that makes sense. I guess when we think of the fleet age it's obviously – it's not old, it's not young, it's kind of in that middle period. Are you concerned with the age generally? And then thinking about the opportunistic selling of the vessels, what are the thoughts of selling ships and replacing with older ones? So maintaining – sorry, buying newer ones. You're basically maintaining a critical mass and not necessarily changing the size of the fleet but just going up in age. Is that something that you can see yourselves doing here once the sale and purchase market falls a bit?

Well, I think first of all I would categorically state there is nothing wrong with an older asset. Generally the debt is being paid down in markets that we've seen over the last eight months, they are cash cows that any owner would be proud to have. So in terms of our fleet age profile, I'm more than happy with where we sit today. I certainly wouldn't want to be sitting with a brand-new fleet with high capital costs. So as we move forward, we stated in our Investor Day presentation in November that we would not be looking at asset purchases during this cycle and we stick by that. Whether we further prune the fleet, again we'll be opportunistic. But yes eventually over time we will have to replace ships but that's not on our radar today. And our – as I said in our presentation, our focus will remain generating the cash flows that we get from the market and putting all of that capital to work reducing our debt.

That's fair. I get it. And then maybe just one more question and it's just on the clean versus dirty. Obviously, if I recall your – most of the LR2s if not all are trading dirty and that obviously proved very fruitful over the past couple of quarters. This quarter obviously the clean market went berserk. Just wanted to ask, is there any inclination on your part to want to try to bring some of those into the clean trade, or are you happy and comfortable sticking with crude?

No. We – again, I think I've said this on previous calls, the beauty of the LR2 is flexibility. So, if we can find opportunity to clean the ships up where the returns are maintained and still good, then certainly we've got no barrier to doing that. It's obviously -- you can't flip overnight and you have to find the right cargo in the right position. So, it does take a little bit of time. But we've got no objection to flipping the ship back into the clean trade if the clean market can hold up. I think we've seen in the last couple of days that that market has started to soften as well and returns are now fairly comparable with what we're getting today certainly in Asia so -- on the dirty side. So, it's something that we just -- we watch on a weekly basis and make determinations based on ship availabilities and when the next open positions are.

Okay. Thank you, Kevin. That's helpful. Appreciate it.

No worries. Thanks Omar.

We'll move on to Value Investor's Edge, J. Mintzmyer.

Hi good morning gentlemen. Congrats on an excellent quarter.

Thanks J.

Thank you, J.

So, yes, it's pretty -- to look at your slide there and see the transformation you guys have done in seven months, I think pretty impressive going from very risky to arguably quite stable. With that said, what is kind of the forward goal for leverage? I know we've been talking around it a little bit with getting safer, looking into 2021, no dividends and so on. But is there a target leverage specifically say 30% or something we can nail down?

No, there isn't a specific number that we will put out there. We ended last year by building a strategy that had us laser-focused on retaining the earnings and paying down our debt. And I think regardless of what the market has given us in the first half the goal is to stick to the plan to go through 2020 and maintain that delevering. And at the end of the year, we'll take a look at where we land and what we've been able to accomplish. And working with our Board we will then look at our capital allocation strategy for 2021. But at this point in time, it's not on our mission-critical list. We're much more focused on how we're handling COVID-19 and what we do over the course of the second half of this year.

Definitely reasonable. Hopefully, the trajectory will stay reasonable on the leverage coming down. You had some good discussions earlier with Omar about asset sales. I know you haven't identified specifically. It's tough to sell in this environment. I've noted you have eight ships that are over 15 years. Are those considered -- I know they're profitable now but are those considered -- not specifically for sale but are those kind of non-core or do you consider those longer term?

Every ship is core when it's making money. As I said the older ones have paid down a fair bit of the debt. So, we don't sign specific ships to specific targets. We will look at it based on what we get offered in the market. Right now though in the S&P market, there doesn't seem to be any appetite for anything younger than 12 years old. So, it may be that we get offers on the older ships more than the younger ship.

Definitely makes sense. I know it's been a good spring and so far a decent summer. Looking at your valuations, like you traded at a large discount to NAV. And that's -- you've been using quarter one financials. If we use quarter two financials it's even worse it's like a 40% discount. I know you said dividends are off the table till 2021. I think that's prudent. Is the same thing true for repurchases? Is this something we just need to wait until maybe say January 2021 and wake up, or is there a potential for some sort of program that way to close the gap?

No, I think the share buyback is the same as dividend. It's not on the table for now. We're focused on delevering and that's what we came into this year focused on doing and that's I think what we're going to end the year doing. And we'll reevaluate and take a look at next year when we need to and arrive at that point.

Understandable. Final question for me. One of the biggest inquiries I get from lot of fellow investors and folks interested in the company is everybody is terrified that shipping companies like yourselves are going to delever build up all this cash right do a good job, but then take all of that cash and blow all of it on newbuilds while the stock is trading at these huge discounts to NAV. Can you offer some sort of pledge or guarantee that you are not going to spend money on newbuilds or asset acquisitions if your stock still trades at a discount to NAV?

No. We're not in the game of empire building. We're in the game of making money. And we'll evaluate what we do with our capital allocation, whether it's newbuildings or share or dividends. At a point when we feel that other than delevering we can add value to shareholders. I've never been a big proponent for running to shipyards and ordering a slew of 50 ships. But we look at the second-hand market. We look at the newbuild market. We look at our share price valuation and we have a lot of detailed discussions with our Board about all those aspects in terms of what we do with our capital allocation. And hopefully other ones are doing the same thing and keep their money in their pockets. And I don't -- personally I don't think we'll see a lot of ordering. I think the access to finance and the questions around future regulatory requirements and fuel technologies is going to keep people on the sidelines in majority for quite some time. There will be ordering, it will happen. But I don't think we'll see it in the same quantums, in the same mass that maybe we've seen in past cycles for those reasons that I've laid out.

Understandable. Thanks for taking my questions and great job the last few quarters.

Thank you, J. Appreciate it.

The next from Randy Giveans with Jefferies.

Hi, gentlemen. How you are doing?

Well, thanks.

Good, Randy.

Sorry I dropped off the line a couple times here, but glad I'm back. So your quarter-to-date rates pretty solid. Your recent time charter fixtures obviously pretty prudent here. Now in recent weeks rates have fallen obviously from the remarkable levels to pretty good levels, right? Can you quantify the recent reduction in rates in terms of the level of spot rates that you booked maybe this week? And then with that how has the time charter rates responded? For example, what's the current one-year time charter rate for a Suezmax and Aframax today?

Yeah. I think on the spot side, it's a varied bucket. As I said earlier, Aframaxes are still fairly healthy in the Far East at or above $30,000 a day. Suezmax is likewise in the same sort of rate region. As you move over towards the mid, that is a little bit softer. We are seeing a reduction of black sea exports, so the mid-market has softened a lot further. But it's a moving target. It's something that -- it moves every day constantly, goes up and down. In terms of the time charter market, it is quieter this week than we've seen in recent weeks. There is a couple of inquiries still out there. But I think the rate levels that, I would call the market at, is uncertain, because obviously with the spot market softening a little bit I think owners' ideas may have come off a little bit. So we'll have to see what the sentiment actually does when somebody puts a ship on subjects and we'll take the market from there.

Got it, okay. And then in terms of, kind of, your balance sheet liquidity, obviously, improving rapidly. Congrats on that front. Now looking at your fleet in terms of possible asset growth, is there a preference for Suezmax versus Aframax? I know you just lump them in together as being midsized assets. But can you differentiate those two for us?

Two points I'd make in answering your question on that Randy. First, we are a midsized tanker company. That is our core, that is our specialty and I don't think you'll see us deviate from that into other segments, so Aframaxes, Suezmaxes, LR2s. We'll take a look at what our fleet profile looks like and then we do arrive at the time when we think fleet renewal is a worthy use of capital. We'll allocate it between those three segments. Second point I'd make is, as we said in November we're not in the market to renew our fleet at this point in time and that remains so very much for the rest of this year.

All right. Well, that’s it for me. Thanks again for the time.

Thanks, Randy.

And at this time, I'd like to turn things back to Mr. Mackay for any closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us today and please hope you and all of your families stay safe and healthy.

And that will conclude today's conference. Again thank you all for joining us.