Thanks, Michael. On Page 4, we highlight the company's performance relative to last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we had a pretax loss of $10.1 million and adjusted EBITDA of $23.3 million. On the right-hand side of the page, we provide a bridge for both metrics. As indicated in the bridge, pretax income from operations was down slightly at $1.4 million below 2016, and adjusted EBITDA from operations was up $3.7 million. The primary drivers of the improvements included growth in warranty products in our insurance segment, the impact of acquisitions in our senior living operations, improved operating metrics in specialty finance and reductions in corporate costs. We will go into these operating drivers in a bit more detail when we cover our segment operations later in the presentation. As you can see in the bridge, our insurance portfolio investment income, excluding the unrealized losses added $1.4 million driven by increases in portfolio assets. Offsetting the positive contributions from operations were 2.7 million of stock-based compensation, granted based on the improvements in underlying performance in prior years and which are accounted for over the vesting period. Several non-recurring items also impacted nine months pretax income. As we discussed in Q2 Reliance’s strong performance over the last 12 months drove an increase of $3 million related to an earn out granted to its selling shareholders at the time of acquisition which is paid in Tiptree shares calculated based on our book value per share. In 2016, we recorded realized gains on sales of certain equity positions primarily related to our liquidation of noncore assets which were also not repeated in 2017. Lastly, as Michael has already mentioned, the single largest contributor to our comparable year-over-year performance was the negative unrealized mark to market on equities in 2017 versus unrealized gains in 2016, which combined for $27.6 million in the nine months. On the next page we outline our capital allocation snapshot for the quarter. Book value per share as exchanged declined 2.6% year-over-year. The decline was the result of the unrealized losses previously mentioned, the issuance of shares relating to the exercise of an option and the Reliance earn out along with dividends paid. Excluding these items operations contributed 65% of EPS over the trailing 12 months along with a $0.07 benefit from repurchasing shares below book for a total improvement of $0.72. Netted in our GAAP equity is a cumulated depreciation on our real estate assets as well as purchase accounting amortization of Fortegra. These combined represent a reduction in value of a $1.67 as of September 2017 as compared to a $1.28 at this point in 2016. On the bottom left you can how our capital is currently allocated across our businesses with over half concentrated in the insurance sector. This is a new non-GAAP measure we’re introducing this quarter and which we expect to provide on an ongoing basis. We believe that this measure will assist investors in understanding the capital allocation portion of our overall strategy. We also provide trailing 12 months normalized EBITDA which is a non-GAAP measure that excludes realized and unrealized gains and losses, stock-based compensation and adjust for non controlling interest in order to provide a view of the underlying operational performance overtime. In total normalized EBITDA was $60.8 million up $3.6 million or a 6.3% improvement. Normalized EBITDA returned on total capital was 9.5% over the last year with strong performances from our insurance, asset management and specialty finance businesses. Over the past year we’ve invested additional capital in Senior Living property and expect to see improvements in underlying performance as the more recently acquired properties achieved stabilized level. Lastly, our corporate expenses are declining as we’ve made substantial improvements in our reporting and controls infrastructure. Moving to page 7, we provide further details regarding our specialty insurance performance. This discussion is divided into two components. First, we will focus on insurance operations and then on the next page performance from the insurance investment portfolio. We continue to see positive top line growth from all of our product lines. For the nine months gross written premiums grew by 3.8% over the prior year contributing to higher unearned premium and deferred revenue, which were up a combined 12.7% from last year. The increase in these two balance sheet items show the impact of growth in the longer-term contracts and the opportunity to enhance net investment income overtime with additional portfolio assets. As we replace some of our shorter duration products, we would expect to see these balance sheet items continue to grow and earn premiums recorded over extended periods of time. The increase in net written premiums was driven primarily by the increased reinsurance retained by our captive insurance subsidiary. Pretax income and adjusted EBITDA from insurance operations were down year-over-year. Adjusted underwriting margin a key measure of insurance product performance was up $2.4 million and trended positively driven by credit protection and warranty improvement. This was offset by $2 million in stock-based compensation along with $4 million in other expenses primarily related to premium tax increases as written premiums continue to grow. The adjusted combined ratio for the quarter was 92.8%, up 3.4 percentage points from the prior year but lower than the nine months, the latter of which was primarily impacted by the carryover stock compensation expense from 2016. This metric is within our parameters of expected underwriting performance from quarter-to-quarter. The increase from our historical combined ratio of approximately 90% is primarily driven by increased investment in the platform to grow our warranty and program products. Looking forward, we plan to continue to expand our warranty product offerings and programs business to drive written premium growth. Turning to the insurance investment portfolio on Page 8. You can see the growth in net investments over the past year. This growth was driven by a combination of several factors, including the assumption of third-party credit protection reinsurance contracts and organic growth in written premiums. Our investment portfolio earnings in the first nine months of 2017 were down primarily due to the unrealized equity losses. Excluding those losses net portfolio income for the nine months was $13.3 million, up $2.4 million driven by increases in dividends, interest income and improvement in realized gains from the sales of nonperforming mortgage loans. As we move forward, volatility related to our mark to market investments will continue from quarter-to-quarter, but our objectives remain the same; to balance our portfolio between cash and liquid short-term investments to cover claims and select alternative investments with a focus on enhanced risk-adjusted total returns over the long term. On Page 9, asset management pretax income year-to-date was $13.1 million, down $1.6 million over 2016. The earning assets under management declined to $1.6 billion, as our older vintage CLOs continue to run off. Our financial results for the nine months were positively impacted by the fair value adjustments of $3.4 million on our investments in CLO sub notes versus losses of $2.8 million in 2016 and increased incentive fees on the older CLOs. Partially offsetting those increases were declines in distributions as a result of smaller sub note holding and lower base management fees as our assets under management declined. The fair value gains, similar to the first half were driven by the strengths in the loan market and the refinancing of one of our CLOs. On Page 10, we continue to see growth in our senior living adjusted EBITDA, primarily driven by additional investments in new properties. Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months was $8.3 million, up $1.1 million from last year, driven by increases in net operating income of 26.5%. During the first nine months of 2017, we added 2 managed properties and 10 triple net leases. And over the latest 12 months, we have acquired $90 million in new properties. On the bottom left-hand portion of the page, you will see the decline in NOI margins year-over-year, primarily due to the impact of industry-wide competition for occupancy, which Michael mentioned earlier. More specifically, increased competition has slowed the recovery of our properties that underwent renovation in 2016. Pretax income for the first nine months was flat versus the prior year as increases in NOI were offset by incremental depreciation in interest expense on newly acquired properties. Now we’ll turn the call back to Michael to conclude our prepared remarks.