Bruce Hausmann
Analyst · Thompson Research. Your line is open
Thank you, Dan, and good morning, everyone. We had a strong start to the year, but began to see impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic as the first quarter progressed, and government orders were issued around the globe. Our global operations experienced a wide spectrum of local government directive, from geographies where social distancing and other measures were required, but construction was still considered essential, to full shelter-in-place lockdowns, where commerce was essentially stopped at the government explicit direction. The more severe the lockdown, the more severe we saw a precipitous decline in revenue. Fortunately, we’re mostly seeing customers delay projects and not cancel them. Our backlog is up approximately $45 million from where it was at the end of 2019. That said, at a minimum, there will be pressure on second quarter earnings as April orders were down approximately 32%, and this phenomenon was fairly broad based with orders down approximately 37% in the Americas, 28% in EMEA, and 28% in Asia-Pac. Sources of optimism for us are the growing backlog, as customer base is mostly delaying orders and not cancelling them and find the stabilization in our recent 4 week moving average sequential order trends. In fact, we’re even starting to see sequential order trends turn up in geographies were lockdown and restrictions and ease like Australia, China and Germany. We particularly see resilience in our rubber business, nora is benefiting from a strong pipeline of large healthcare, education and life sciences projects that continue to be supported in major markets. With that context in mind, here is more information on our first quarter results. And as a reminder, fiscal 2020 is a 53 week year for Interface, and the first quarter of 2020 had 14 weeks versus 13 weeks in the first quarter of 2019. Net sales in Q1 2020 were down 3% versus the prior year period, including the extra fiscal week in Q1 2020. Organic sales were down 2%, which excluded a negative currency translation impact of $5 million in the quarter. Sales in our Americas business declined 2% in the first quarter with strong January and February results, offset by sharp declines in March. Resilient flooring maintains a strong growth pattern throughout the quarter with the clients concentrated in carpet tile. EMEA sales were up 5% in local currency, went up 2% in the U.S. dollars due to currency headwinds. Similar to our American business, strong January and February results were negatively impacted by declines in March. Resilient flooring drove growth, particularly rubber in key markets such as healthcare, education and industrial. Sales in Asia-Pacific were down 15% in local currency compared to first quarter last year, but were down 20% in U.S. dollars, largely due to the weaker Australian dollar. Our Australian business had a strong start to the year and end of the quarter up double-digits in local currency despite flat performance in March. At our Asian business, on the other hand, was impacted by the pandemic earlier in the quarter, it was down significantly. In our global market segments hospitality, living and education are the strongest growth in Q1. We’re encouraged by our gross margins, despite double-digit percentage production declines in the quarter resulting from temporary plant closures at several of our carpet tile facilities at different periods throughout the quarter. First quarter gross profit margin was 39.7%, up 60 basis points versus the first quarter gross profit margin last year, and adjusted gross profit margin was 40.1%, a 30 basis point improvement over adjusted gross profit margin last year. SG&A expenses were $88 million in the first quarter, or 30.4% of sales. Adjusted SG&A expenses were $86 million or 29.9% of sales. Given macroeconomic conditions that we saw in Northern Asia in Q1, along with significant declines in equity market valuations, we determined the indicators of goodwill impairment and after discussions with our external auditors and review of the accounting literature, we performed the required analysis that resulted in a $121 million charge for impairment of goodwill and intangibles. This is a non-cash charge. Including the non-cash impairment charge, you recognized an operating loss of $94 million in the first quarter, compared with operating income of $16 million in Q1 last year. Adjusted operating income was $29 million, up 60% versus operating income of $18 million in the first quarter last year. We recorded a net loss of $102 million in the first quarter, and a loss of $1.75 per diluted share. Adjusted net income was $19 million or $0.32 per diluted share in Q1 2020 compared to $8 million or $0.14 per diluted share last year. Adjusted EBITDA was $35 million in Q1, up 10% versus $31 million last year. Lastly, our balance sheet remains strong as we vigilantly manage cash through this period of declining demand even though the first quarter is typically a period where we have heavy use of cash, as we fund bonus payments and other prepaid expenses like insurance and taxes. We ended the quarter with a healthy balance of cash on hand and strong liquidity. Net debt or gross debt minus cash on hand was $555 million, and the last 12 months of adjusted EBITDA was $203 million at the end of Q1, resulting in a net loss leverage ratio of 2.7 times calculated as net debt divided by adjusted EBITDA. Interest expense was $6 million in the first quarter compared to $7 million in Q1 of last year. Depreciation and amortization was $11 million consistent with last year. Capital expenditures were $22 million in Q1 2020 compared to $20 million in the first quarter of last year in line with our expectations. With that, I’d like to turn the call back over to Dan.