Michael Jones
Analyst · the end
Thank you, Phoevos. Good morning, and welcome to interim results for the 6 months ended 31 March, 2026. Our co-product business model of producing both platinum group metals and chrome concentrates, not only differentiates us from our peers, but has again proved the resilience of the Tharisa model. If we look back over this past period, the commodity prices and always believe that there's a fundamental shortage and deficits in PGMs, in particular, have really supported our business model going forward, contributing significantly to cash flow generations. So for the 6-month period, we generated $96.4 million of operational cash flow. This has enabled us to continue investing in not only sustainability of operations, but also in our growth projects such as Karo Platinum. Just to give an indication of the impact of the improved PGM basket price in particular, the peak funding required for the underground mining project was $173 million. On the back of these stronger prices, very pleasing that has reduced the peak funding by some $45 million. However, we have secured, and I'm pleased to say all the full underground mining finance required of $179 million in terms of facilities and asset-backed financing. As mentioned, we do not invest only in the sustainability of operations, but also in our growth projects. Over this past financial period, we invested $103.5 million in our future. Of that amount, $65.5 million was invested in sustaining CapEx. So that's really the open cost fleet. We still have some 8 years left of open cost mining as well as the plants that we have on site. Underground CapEx, while we budgeted just over $76 million for the full year, we only incurred $16.3 million in the first 6 months. There will be a rapid expansion as we go through the second 6 months, particularly as we invest in the underground mining fleet. We have continued to invest on a disciplined basis in Karo Platinum, and we match the cash flows available to certain selected projects such as Chirundazi Dam and infrastructure for the power stations, power lines, and we invested $21.4 million over this particular period. I'm just going to touch on some of these highlights of these numbers and then have a look in more detail at the revenue and costs going forward. Very pleasing revenue is up 28% at $359.4 million, and that's really on the back of the strongly improved PGM basket price. EBITDA pleasing, 138.1% increase to $104.3 million. Profit before tax, also strongly up at $69.9 million, translating to earnings per share of $0.158 per share, that's up 532% -- and very pleasing, the Board approved an increased interim dividend payout of $0.025 per share. The control period is $0.015, and that equates to a 15.9% payout. Just analyzing the revenue in more detail. As mentioned, increase of 28%. Phoevos has already mentioned the 85.3% increase in the average PGM basket price, so that averaged $2,599 per ounce. There's also an increase of 17.4% in overall PGM ounces sold. Notwithstanding the 12.3% increase in the average metallurgical grade chrome price that averaged $284, there was a slight decrease as we manage the working capital, just a timing issue in terms of a decrease in overall tonnes of chrome concentrate sold. If we look at the breakdown of the revenue, and we look at this on an FCA basis. So typically, we sell chrome, metallurgical grade chrome on a CIF basis, which includes insurance and freight, and that's the cost of transporting the goods from mine to final port destination Indonesia and China. Stripping that out to make it gate revenue, the PGMs contributing just under 60% to the overall revenue and chrome just over 40%. Just to touch on the pie chart on the right, which shows the revenue prill split, the revenue earnings. The prill split, for example, for rhodium equates to about 10% of the production, but contributes some 35% to overall revenue on the back of very strong rhodium prices. Gross profit, we continue to maintain very healthy gross profit margins, very pleasing to maintain at 30.3% and a gross profit of $108.9 million. Now this chart, I really like because it gives us a snapshot of what happened over the last 6 months. So if you have a look at the half year, starting with 2025, the EBITDA of $43.8 million. We've spoken about the impact of the increase in the PGM volumes. And as Phoevos mentioned, the star performer, the PGM prices making a significant contribution to our increase in EBITDA. Chrome volumes, as mentioned, slightly down, some mining cost inflation. And mining commodities, I just remind the audience that is we purchased some run-of-mine stockpiles strategically to optimize the throughput through the plant and ensure we have full throughput. So that's a mining commodity purchase run of mine ore, small processing cost adjustments, inventories, just a favorable movement in inventory 6 months to 6 months, that's an income statement movement coming through and translating to that very healthy $104.3 million EBITDA. Unit costs, this is a very busy slide going through, but I'm just going to pick on some of the numbers. So on the table on the left, the tonnes milled flat at 2.7 million tonnes. That's effectively the plant capacity for its throughput. The on-mine cash cost per tonne milled, down marginally 8.8% at $51.8 per tonne. Just to note in terms of computing that cost, that excludes deferred stripping, so accountants capitalize the deferred stripping and other stripping ahead of our requirements. That deferred stripping amount to $33.5 million, and we get the benefit of that going forward as we access the reef that has been exposed, but it does, however, include the cost of the purchased run of mine ore. The chrome inland logistics and freight costs up marginally 6.8% at $86.5 per tonne. Just to note that there was the impact of the Middle East conflict on the cost of fuel and therefore, knocking on to the freight costs was subsequent to this reporting period. And I'm pleased to say that from a chrome pricing point of view, the chrome price has adjusted to compensate for that increase in overall freight costs. The one, I think, really key number on this slide is an all-in cost per platinum group ounce sold. So if you look at our business model, we are a co-producer of both platinum group metals and chrome. So if we offset the chrome revenue and we say we are a PGM producer, we're getting an all-in sustaining cost, excluding the Karo Platinum investments of $268 per ounce. This needs to be seen in the context of a current basket price of some $2,800 and a payable percentage of 80%, showing you the robustness and resilience of our co-product business model. What's even more pleasing is we then say we're an all-in cost producer of only platinum to compare to some of our peers, we get a negative cost of $2,822. And again, one of the key contributors to that is the very strong rhodium price, which while contributing some 10% to the prill split, contributes some 35% to our overall revenue. The only other number I'd like to highlight on this slide, and I think it's very relevant in the current market looking forward is diesel and our all-in cost on the mine costs. It comprises 10.9%. The impact of the Middle East conflict going forward on diesel will therefore impact on those costs. Thanks, Phoevos. As mentioned previously, we continue to invest in the sustainability of our operations as well as the expansion. We incurred a capital expenditure for the year of the 6 months for $103.5 million. As mentioned, the deferred stripping, which is the accountants have the fund is $33.5 million. Total capital commitments at 31 March stood at $120.2 million, largely related to the underground mine development with Karo Platinum having capital commitments of $27.7 million. Looking to the full year, the budget is $165.9 million. Just to mention that budget excludes the deferred stripping, and I expect that to be marginally lower than for the first 6 months and also excludes the Karo Platinum as we fund that project based on availability of funding. We'll touch on that shortly. It does, however, include the $76.7 million that we mentioned earlier to be spent on the underground development. Our balance sheet remains extremely healthy and is well positioned to fund our ongoing investments in our respective projects. We are at an investment heavy stage of our development. Cash and cash equivalents, $184.3 million. Total debt, $130.3 million, and so net cash of $54 million on the balance sheet. Just to touch on it, of the total debt, $42.1 million is short-dated, revolving credit and such facilities going forward. The predominant portion, 80% is dollar-based. And then just some very healthy financial ratios, a current ratio of 2.3x. And as mentioned, a net cash positive position, so a negative debt-to-equity ratio of 6.1%. If we just move to the graph in the middle of the page, and I think this really reflects our investments and our commitment to financial discipline. Net cash from operations was $96.4 million. If we have a look at our sustaining CapEx and to us, the underground is part of our sustaining CapEx, while it's a separate project because it expands our life of mine to excess of 60 years. we incurred $83.9 million, leaving us with a positive free cash flow remaining of $12.5 million. And then look at our investment in the future, not only in Karo, but in the beneficiation projects being undertaken by the likes of Arxo Metals, incurring $21.4 million and giving us free cash flow of $8.9 million going -- a negative $8.9 million overall. Our dividend policy is declared a dividend of 15% of consolidated net profit after tax. That is an annual basis. Our practice has been to declare an interim dividend of 40% of the annualized half year. So very pleasing that the Board approved an increased dividend of $0.025, which equates to 15.9% of our consolidated net profit after tax. That is a very high-level overview of the financial results, and I'd like to hand over to Phoevos. Thank you, Phoevos.