Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to The Hanover Insurance Group Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. My name is Derek and I'll be your operator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. We shall facilitate a question-and-answer session at the end of the conference. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I will now turn the conference over to Oksana Lukasheva. You may proceed.

…and thank you for joining us for our third quarter conference call. We will begin today’s call with prepared remarks from Joe Zubretsky, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Gene Bullis. Available to answer your questions after our prepared remarks are: Jack Roche, President of Commercial Lines; Dick Lavey, President of Personal Lines; Johan Slabbert, Chief Executive Officer of Chaucer, and our incoming Chief Financial Officer, Jeff Farber. Before I turn the call over to Joe, let me note that our earnings press release, financial supplement, and a complete slide presentation for today’s call are available in the Investors section of our website at www.hanover.com. After the presentation, we will answer questions in the Q&A session. Our prepared remarks and responses to your questions today, other than statements of historical fact, include forward-looking statements, including our 2016 outlook. There are certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by this press release, slide presentation, and conference call. We caution you with respect to reliance on forward-looking statements, and in this respect to refer you to the forward-looking statement section in our press release, slide two of the presentation deck, and our filings with the SEC. Today’s discussion will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as operating income and accident share loss and combined ratios excluding catastrophes among others. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the closest GAAP measure on a historical basis can be found in the press release or the financial supplement, which are posted on our website, as I mentioned earlier. With those comments, I will turn the call over to Joe.

Thank you, Oksana. Welcome everyone to our third quarter earnings call. We are in operating income of $78.6 million, or $1.83 per fully diluted share in the quarter, an increase of 13.7% over the prior year quarter on a per share basis and we produced a consolidated combined ratio of 94.2%, generating an operating return on equity of 11.6%. We are pleased with our performance in the quarter. The trends we experienced across many of our business segments and how we are positioned for the fourth quarter and 2017. As we will detail in our remarks, underlying results were lower than expected catastrophe losses, consistently favorable underwriting performance, rate increases across our domestic business, and healthy and controlled overall net written premiums growth of 4.3%. We also made significant progress on business initiatives in each segment during the quarter. While some challenges remain, we are satisfied with our performance and pleased with the growth trends in this very competitive market. This morning I will discuss highlights of our third quarter results and trends, Gene will review our financial performance and business results by segment. I will then give you an update on our market position and long-term strategic planning process, and then the team and I will take your questions. In commercial lines, we posted a combined ratio of 99.2%, a net written premium growth of 4.8%. Our topline performance reflects a consistent level of price increases and higher rate of retention. We continue to improve the quality of our in force book of business, calibrating rate to renewal in new business flow, in order to maximize retention on our most attractive business and improved profitability on lower performing accounts. We increased prices in core commercial lines by 3.9%, a good result in the current environment, driven by our focus…

Thank you, Joe, and good morning everyone. On a consolidated basis, third quarter 2016 net income was $88.4 million or $2.06 per diluted share compared to $78.3 million or $1.74 per diluted share in the third quarter of last year. Operating income was $78.6 million or $1.83 per diluted share compared to $72.2 million or $1.61 per diluted share in the prior year quarter. The overall combined ratio was 94.2% compared to 94.9% in the third quarter of 2015, aided by lower catastrophe losses, partially offset by lower favorable development on prior year loss reserves. Third quarter 2016 results reflect overall favorable development of $8.1 million, driven by $26.6 million at Chaucer, partially offset by unfavorable development of $19.3 million in commercial lines. Turning now to underwriting margins by business segment, starting with commercial lines. The current accident year loss ratio of 57.2% excluding catastrophes represents a 0.5 point improvement over the prior year quarter, primarily driven by favorable property experience in CNP. Our current accident year loss ratio selection for CNP liability coverages remains cautious and reflects increased medical costs and attorney involvement, primarily in soft tissue injury claims in major metro areas, the same trends evident in prior accident year loss performance. In response to unfavorable claims experienced in CNP liability in prior years, we updated ultimate estimates and recorded $9.1 million of unfavorable development in this line. Although the accident year loss ratio in commercial auto we still expected profitability, loss trends clearly are leveling off. As demonstrated by a consistent accident year loss ratio in 2016 and 2015 through nine months. The $1.9 million of unfavorable development in this line during the third quarter relates to a write-off of a reinsurance receivable from the 2012 outward renewal rights deal when we transferred a portion of our…

Thank you, Gene. As we mentioned during our second quarter earnings call, we are now in the middle of a comprehensive long-term strategic planning process. We are working to define the road ahead, including our long-term financial goals and aspirations, and the key investment decisions we will need to make. The process starts with a realistic assessment of the quality and sustainability of the current business platforms and a forward-looking view of how the business landscape might change. We believe there is ample headwind to grow within our existing independent agency channel, which will remain at the epicenter of our strategy. The course this company has been on for the past 10 years is a very sound one, increased leverage and optimization of the current agency plan and the existing product portfolio will likely serve as the first wave of profitable growth on any strategic path we set. This is supported by empirical data of market share by agency, opportunities to increase product penetration, strength of competitors, and appetite by market and by agent. During my listening tour, I have met with hundreds of our agent partners and have received candid and constructive feedback on what we do well, but more importantly, what we can do better to grow together profitably. Agents appreciate the value of our product suite and service. They are confident in our ability to solve some of the challenges they face in the current marketplace, including market maturity, lack of organic growth, agency M&A, and disruptors attempting to drive business from the advice channel to the direct channel. By helping our agent partners target value-added markets, including specialty and developing our own complementary capabilities to provide broader relevant product offerings, we can help agents address some of these issues while at the same time, building our…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from the line of Meyer Shields, KBW.

Thanks. Good morning. Two things I wanted to hit on, if I can. One, if you take a step back and look thematically, what do you think is the biggest driver of the reserve release -- non-catastrophe reserve releases from Chaucer?

Meyer, hi, this is Joe Zubretsky speaking. Look as we said in our prepared remarks, the Chaucer business model, obviously, inherently has reporting lags, operates at higher positions in the towers of excess layers and therefore, inherently you take a more conservative position on a business that has that profile. So, obviously, we book our best estimate, but that best estimate includes an element of conservatism given that reporting lag and high excess nature of the business.

Okay. Do you see that as independent of pricing trends? Again, in Chaucer?

I'm not sure, I understand -- I think it's independent of pricing trend. Yes, no matter which way the prices go, we would be holding reserves at a very high confidence level, knowing that there are reporting lags, particular on a reinsurance business. We're not in claims control and therefore, you find things out inherently later. So, irrespective of hard market or soft market, we will have a consistent reserving philosophy to be conservative.

Okay, perfect. And then if I could turn quickly to the personal lines, I was wondering if there is any way of characterizing the type of carriers from whom you are winning share. Is it regional carriers or the larger guys?

I'm going to turn that over to Dick Lavey.

Yes, sure. Well, frankly, we competition from both national players and regional players in the marketplace where we're in as you know, 17 states. Michigan is a good example where we compete more with regional type, domestic carriers versus the national players. That's true in a state like Maine as well. But other states, New Jersey, other -- some of our southern states, we would build again both types of competitors. So, I can't say it's one type or other; it's frankly a blend of both.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Your next question will come from the line of Charles Sebaski, BMO Capital Markets.

Good morning and nice quarter. I guess first in the commercial lines and the strong growth you're seeing, I guess two parts. How much of the growth is new policies and where, maybe within specialty, are you seeing that? And two, how much of it is rate and underwriting changes?

Before I turn it to Jack, I'll just make some framing comments. For the most part, the new business flow in commercial lines serve to offset business loss at renewal. So, most of the impact on is new money rates, a portion of which is pure rate, a portion of which is exposure. That being said, we also had a very substantial increase in our retention rate up to 87% as we think there are fewer accounts being put out to renewal. I think its confidence in Jack and his team's ability to deliver a quality product, consistently priced and high service levels that leads to retention rates. That might not be repeatable quarter-after-quarter, but it's certainly a sign that we're serving our customers very, very well. So, that's the framing coming. Jack, I don't know if you have anything to add?

Yes. And Joe that's pretty much the whole story, the major contributor to the uptick and growth was elevated retentions and as Gene stated in the script that we had -- some of that was effective, less profit improvement actions in the quarter and some improvement quite frankly, and some of the better tiers in our pricing segmentation. We got higher retentions in the better business, consistent with our hope and expectation and frankly, I think you saw that maybe across the industry that the third quarter there was an uptick in retentions. The business is leveling off from a pricing standpoint and I think that might give us opportunity quite frankly to push a little bit harder in things like commercial auto where we might be able to get the accelerated rate increases. So, we're going to continue to balance that and get that mid-single-digits growth as long as we believe we're moving forward on our margins.

All right. Regarding the retention, are you just holding the accounts or you just -- is there -- do you think there's less submission flow? I guess are you -- is the win rate less or is it just everyone is sitting still?

Well, I would say for us, it varies quite substantially across the various businesses. Overall, if you look at the submission levels have clawed back slightly, but mostly, the hit rates are coming down a little bit as we continue to stay disciplined and less better business comes to the market. I think what we said to you in the past is that we worked really hard to pull in some of the business that we want from our distributors through our pipelining efforts. So, we don't completely rely on flow, but net-net is that new businesses is continuing to be pretty level because submission activities are our moderating slightly, retention ratio is hitting back and we're just being the more successful on the targeted business that we're pulling in.

All right. And I guess a follow-up is on the review -- the reserve review process in commercial. And I realize it's underway, but I was wondering if there's just any context that you might be able to give on how you think about the reserve position on what would potentially -- what are the levels or what would be the triggering events to kind of take a cleanup charge as opposed to continuing the reserve development in AIX and CMP along the lines that we've seen in the last few quarters?

Well, I think obviously making our best estimate in our 50/50 picks in the past few quarters those have been pressured by -- mostly increased severity unknown claims. So, obviously, our best estimate wasn't sufficient. So the way we conduct this reserve review is by line of business, you make a qualitative assessment of the strength of your case reserves, you then look at your actuarial development patterns and update those and revise those if you actually feel it changed that causes you to perhaps make changes to your ultimate loss pick within an actuarial range and it might even cause you hold the higher point in the range -- producing a higher confidence level that reserves are more likely to run off favorably than unfavorably. All this will be overseen by Jeff Farber, it will be reviewed twice, once by our audit firm and once by Tillinghast and we'll report at the appropriate time. But specifically, all lines of business, obviously, with a deep dive into both the program business and CNP liability, the two areas that are causing the most pressure.

Excellent. And then I guess just finally on the personal lines business. Appreciate the color on how much of the book is account business and increasing I think. Is there a thought or opportunity, I guess, on the existing book? How much of that 82% of the account business is platinum product? Obviously it's making up the majority of the new business, but how much of the whole book is platinum today?

When you look at the whole book, it's about 25% so far. Platinum has been out in the marketplace for a couple years now, so that's increasing at a pretty rapid pace, but the full book is about 25%.

And of our sales Platinum represents about 70% of new sales. So, you should see how that as the in force book builds with new business coming in that's going to build pretty substantially over time.

And the higher percentage -- that number is a higher percentage when you take out Massachusetts where Platinum is not yet available.

Okay. I was wondering is there a thought or a benefit opportunity on rolling the existing book into a Platinum product or is it really just more of a marketing opportunity for new business growth?

Yes, we're going to tackle some of that when we rollout our new platform, which as you know, we're rolling into Pennsylvania first, but then we're going to bring that to our existing state. And when we do that, we will be migrating our home business to our new home product.

Charles one other point on that, you noticed in our remarks that we said before that one of Dick's strategies is to target the emerging affluent. And emerging affluent will have higher coverage limits, multiple homes, multiple cars, deeper umbrella penetration, which as you know, has high margins, comes with a lower new business penalty and a higher retention rate. So, the net present value of a Platinum customer, which should result from our emerging affluent strategy, should be significant.

Excellent. Thanks a lot for the answers, guys.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And at this time, I'm showing no questions in queue. I will turn the call back over to Oksana Lukasheva for any closing remark.

Thank you very much for your participation today. We are looking forward to speaking with you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen that concludes today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.