Thank you, Ben, and good morning, everyone. Let's begin with an update of several ongoing emissions-related items that I talked about previously. As we reported about a year ago, the company sold an emissions kit to the Municipal Water District in Southern California that purchased our first system in 2013.
In this case, the kit was to be utilized on a much larger engine and fueled, not by natural gas, but by a gas manufactured on site as part of their wastewater treatment process. So let me give you some of the back story. The production of biofuel gas in wastewater treatment plants is a byproduct of the process. However, the gas needs to be thoughtfully handled. Venting would be inappropriate as it is harmful to the environment. The traditional practice has been to simply flare the gas, but this wastes its potential as a renewable energy source. Power generation with the biofuel, which is preferable and also a common practice in recent years, is becoming problematic in Southern California. Biofueled engines beginning in 2017 will be subject to regulations equivalent to those applying to natural gas sources. Hence, the interest in the Ultera system for this customer. The wastewater plant produces the biofuel in abundance, of course, and its utilization for power generation, with compliant emissions is a major goal of the agency.
As of a few weeks ago, the engine is up and running. It's a 50-liter Caterpillar bottle altered to operate with a biofuel and powering a large blower that's used in the after-treatment process. The initial emissions levels are as expected and just terrific, on par with our natural gas results, and of course, easily compliant with the 2017 regulation that's coming up. Going forward, this system will be closely monitored as we have done in the past with our other applications on the technology. And we will, of course, provide updates as the testing progresses. As a side note, this project has already generated interest in the industry. We have been asked by a significant engineering firm that specializes in wastewater plant engineering and design to present the technology to their staff in California.
In our previous earnings reports, we discussed a project also in California that concerns a customer owning a group of natural gas-fueled generators that need to be operating frequently. As the run hours exceed the maximum allowed for emergency generation, emergency generators, the units must meet the standard for continuous power generation. These are the same standards, of course, that we've passed with our cogeneration products. However, the simple generator receives no heat recovery credit in setting its emissions levels under this standard. As such, the emissions levels required to permit these engines are the lowest we have ever seen and not yet been achieved by any engine. By way of reference, they are about 1/2 of what the cogeneration credit gives you with -- for heat recovery.
As reported before, a sample generator was purchased and outfitted at Tecogen with our system. It worked extremely well, and the customer proceeded to apply for permits for this test generator, and also for the existing on-site units to be retrofitted.
In October, the Phase 2 order was received for Tecogen to ship the test generator to the customer and complete the retrofit of the other units. The purchase order was for about $0.5 million and we anticipate getting the kits and test units to the customer in about 10 weeks. And we would expect the initial units to be operational in Q1.
As far as the permitting goes for the project, the customer currently has a permit to construct. That is, the regulators have reviewed the technology, found it to be adequate, and given permission to go forward. The units may be operated subject to the certification test that has to happen within the first month of operation. We believe the final permit will be to the strictest standard ever achieved by an engine. Achieving these limits, essentially the same as a fuel cell, will enable simple generators to be applied without hesitation to peak shaving applications, and also of course, to demand response projects as well. In our last call, I also discussed interest by an industry group in our technology for an entirely new mobile application. After their visit and review of our proposal outlined for demonstrating our technology, we submitted to them a detailed proposal. They plan to formally evaluate that proposal in Q1.
As far as new activity is concerned, as John and Ben both mentioned, we announced last month that the company would form a technical committee to examine bringing the Tecogen technology to the automotive industry. Our October 7 press release lists the committee members. However, I want to mention 2 that are especially relevant, Ahmed Ghoniem and Angelina Galiteva. Professor Ghoniem holds a distinguished Mechanical Engineering Chair at MIT, and has considerable relevant expertise in this direct area of combustion in engines and so forth.
Ms. Galiteva, likewise, brings knowledge that is directly applicable. In her case, the expertise is in the area of green energy and related regulations, notably those in California where many of the air quality emissions regulations emanate from, including automobiles. So this initiative was born, as John said, out of the VW scandal which really resonated with us as it followed a familiar storyline to our own experience.
Specifically, our industry suffered a similar distress in 2006 when inspections by regulators exposed widespread noncompliance. The result was a significant change in the regulatory climate. Compliance levels were reduced, and the testing methodology was overhauled to reflect really real-world conditions. We know our technology does not apply to diesel engines, but the reporting has pointed out to possible problems pertaining to gasoline engines. While it's acknowledged that gasoline engines are tested honestly, but the issue is that the testing does not reflect real-world performance under more varied conditions, et cetera.
So we are perhaps following a similar path now with gasoline engines that compelled us to examine this market more closely. So up to now, our committee has held 3 meetings with various action items completed in the interim. To augment the committee, we reached out to various organizations, private consultants and so forth. Thus far, we are focused on understanding the regulatory framework, which pollutants are regulated to what levels, and of course, where are these regulations going in the future.
We have also looked more closely at the chemistry, will our process work with this type of fuel and so forth. Our consensus is that the chemistry is similar and the process should in principle work with gasoline-fueled engines. Regulations for automobiles are much more nuanced than our stationary regulations. They vary by class of vehicle, vehicle miles per gallon and the certification level that vehicle attains to, super clean or just ordinary certification. But in general, I would say that the current standards -- current regulations for automobiles are considerably above the current standards we have encountered with Ultera in stationary applications.
Several years hence, new regulations will become effective, we know this, which will take the regulations down successively over a multiyear period. Our belief at this point, is that the regulations and chemistry align well with our technology. For now, the work of the committee will continue until ready to make its recommendations for the next steps. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Dave Garrison, to discuss the company financials. Thank you.