Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to Teck Resources Q3 2019 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. This conference call is being recorded on Thursday, October 24, 2019. I would now like to turn the conference over to Fraser Phillips, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Strategic Analysis. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much, [Atlanta]. Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining us for Teck's third quarter 2019 Results Conference Call. Before we begin, I would like to draw your attention to the caution regarding forward-looking statements on Slide 2. This presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding our business. This slide describes the assumptions underlying those statements. Various risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to vary. Teck does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statements. I would also like to point out that we use various non-GAAP measures in this presentation. You can find explanations and reconciliations regarding these measures in the appendix. With that, I will turn the call over to Don Lindsay, our President and CEO.

Thank you, Fraser and good morning everyone. I will begin on Slide 3 with highlights from our third quarter. And I'll be followed by Ron Millos, our CFO, who will provide some additional color on our financial results. We will conclude with a Q&A session where Ron and I, and additional members of our senior management team would be happy to answer any questions. But before we get into the quarter, I wanted to touch for a moment on the recent civil unrest in Chile. Chile is very important to Teck and not only for our business, but also because of the strong connection to our employees, our communities and stakeholders. This is clearly a very difficult time for the Chilean people and our thoughts are with all of those impacted. We have taken steps early on to insure Teck employees are accounted for and safe. We've had no issues to-date at any of our sites and work at the QB2 project is continuing. We will continue to closely monitor events as they develop with our top priority being the safety of our people. Turning to the highlights from our third quarter, we continue to execute our straightforward strategy of running our operations safely, efficiently and sustainably to generate cash, successfully execute on our QB2 Project and return excess cash to shareholders. QB2 construction is moving forward with over 5,000 people actively working on site across the six major construction areas. We are building considerable value for shareholders through the development of this world-class copper project. First production is targeted for the fourth quarter of 2021. We continue to advance our RACE21 innovation-driven efficiency program to generate an initial CAD150 million in annualized EBITDA improvements by the end of 2019 and significant additional improvements beyond that year. We were also…

Thanks, Don. I'll start with a summary of changes in our cash position during the third quarter disclosed on Slide 14. So we generated approximately CAD1.1 billion in cash flow from operations and we also received CAD406 million in equity contributions from Sumitomo Metal Mining and Sumitomo Corporation in the quarter and that was the final payment of their $1.2 billion investment in QB2. We spent CAD824 million on capital projects and we purchased 180 million in Class B shares, which were cancelled. Our capitalized stripping costs were CAD159 million and we paid CAD104 million in interest and finance charges and we also paid CAD28 million in our regular base dividend during the quarter. After these and other minor items, we ended the quarter with cash and short-term investments of about CAD1.6 billion. Turning to Slide 15. Our financial position remains strong with around CAD6.8 billion of liquidity currently, and that includes CAD1.6 billion in cash, CAD1 billion of that is in Chile for the development of QB2. And on Tuesday, as Don mentioned, we extended the maturity by one year on our US$4 billion uncommitted credit facility out to November 2024. We have no significant debt maturities prior to 2035 and we have investment grade credit ratings from the four major credit rating agencies, we expect to close the $2.5 billion limited recourse project financing facility to fund the development of QB2 in the fourth quarter with first borrowing not expected until early 2020. And as we've mentioned many times, the QB2 partnering transaction and the financing plan dramatically reduce our funding requirements for the project to approximately $700 million excluding escalation and no cash contributions are expected from Teck until early 2021. Moving on to the next slide, as Don mentioned earlier, we have implemented a companywide cost…

Thank you, Ron. As I said at the outset, given the current global economic uncertainty, we are focusing our attention on our RACE21 program to efficiency and productivity across all our business. We're also focused on the execution of our priority project at Neptune terminals and of course the development of the QB2 project, which is a key component of Teck's future growth. While our financial position remains strong, we have implemented a companywide cost reduction program to reduce spending targeting approximately CAD500 million in reductions through the end of 2020. These actions are consistent with executing our straightforward strategy of running our operations safely, efficiently and sustainably to generate cash, successfully executing our QB2 project and returning additional cash to shareholders. And with that, we would be happy to answer your questions. And I should note that some of our management team members are calling in from different locations. So there may be a brief pause after you ask your question while we sort out, who's going to be answering it from one-time. So back to you, operator.

Thank you [Operator Instructions] The first question is from Matthew Korn with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

First, I just want to understand a little bit more the spending in the cost reduction program, as I see it. And please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is essentially comprising CAD250 million reduction in capital, CAD150 million of that is deferred. And then another CAD250 million of this is OpEx its permanent and this is largely head count and you expect to reach that OpEx run rate improvement by the end of your 2020, is that -- am I understanding you correctly?

That sounds generally in line there. Yes.

On the operational side in coal, in particular, could you explain the material handling problems, a little bit more there. Why they proven to be so persistent? What you're doing now to help solve them? And should we expect this to persist really until Neptune reduces pressure or are there other variables here that we're not appreciating?

Just before I turn it over to Robin Sheremeta on that question, I just want to add one comment. In your summary of the cost reduction program, imply that the timeline for getting to the low -- lower operating as this goes right to the end of the year. In fact the OpEx will it be achieved quite soon. We are implementing the CRP immediately and we'll get a lot of the operating costs out quite quickly. Robin?

I'll start off by saying, we don't expect this to persist any longer and I'll kind of give you a bit of an explanation of why that is. We discovered at one of the sites we are experiencing longer than average train dump times and we did have intermittent excessive trade dump times associated with coal coming from that particular site. We had a task force that looked into this from a number of different perspectives, both from the material handling at port end site and really what they discovered was a process -- condition at the plant, at that site that was introducing a higher moisture levels in small parcels into the product. And so when we understood what that process condition was we were able to address it. And what we've seen since addressing it now is that we are having much more consistent train outfloating at all core facilities. So I'm pretty confident I guess at this stage, certainly that we've addressed that particular issue that was affecting us. We did isolate it to a particular process within one site. So I think that's behind us now.

Thank you. The next question is from Orest Wowkodaw with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Just pressing a bit more on the cost reductions, you disclose that you expect operating costs in coal to be lower next year versus this year. Is the right way to sort of think about the potential magnitude here. I think, I heard you say, there's -- could potentially be CAD200 million of OpEx savings, I assume most of that's in the coal division. And so that could be kind of $7 to $8 a ton, plus you should be saving. I think on a lower strip ratio next year. I'm just curious if you can magnitude or give us some kind of order of magnitude of how much lower coal cost could be next year versus this year?

Over to Robin.

Yes, I'd like to walk you through just some of the factors, because the cost reduction program is one aspect of it and you touched on another pretty key one, which was the strip ratio and I know we've talked about this in the past a few times. But we have been mining at a higher strip ratio for the last couple of years and this is really to get our operations aligned after Coal Mountain closure and in anticipation of the Cardinal River operation closing down here later in 2020. So if you look back in 2018, our strip ratio was around 11.1 to 1, it's now peaking at about 11.4 to 1. And in 2020, our strip ratio is going to be close to about 10.5 to 1. So that's a substantial decline from what we've had in the last couple of years and our strip ratio over the next five years goes from that 10.5 in 2020 down to about the long-term run -- outreach of 10 to 1. So that's a major, obviously, cost factor in the coal operations and it's one that's improving next year and forward into 2020. The other piece around costs and it does flip into CRP to some extent, but the first three quarters of this year, we focused a lot obviously on producing as much coal we could into a market that was paying substantial amount for it. So we did incur additional costs and I've used this example several times, where we would haul coal from the Elkview operation, where we had additional raw coal available and we hold it all the way to our Coal Mountain operation, which is 30 kilometers south, they had the plant available to us. So that cost more money, it increased our operating…

Do all those components kind of add up to a ballpark number that could be in the order of $10 a ton. Is that what we're talking about here?

I wouldn't speculate on a ballpark number at this stage. I'd like to see us altogether, the budget, all the different components, into a plan that we would be able to speak to in terms of guidance.

Just to remind everybody, we will be giving our full year guidance in the February quarterly call after we release our annual results and that would give you a better answer or so at that time. And then Orest, just for you, we noted in your report this morning that you referred to the CRP as deferrals. While there are some deferrals that may come in after 2021, most of the program is actual cost reductions that will be in place soon.

Thank you. And the next question is from Jackie Przybylowski with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

I just want to start maybe by circling back to what you were talking about earlier. The civil unrest that was being experienced in Chile right now. Recognizing that you are in the midst of negotiations with your workers at Andacollo. And so I was wondering if there is any sort of impact of the unrest and sort of the -- the local dissatisfaction with wages and working conditions and the things that have been protested against and if there is any kind of trickle into your union negotiations there?

I'm going to turn that one over to Dale Andres, who just returned from Chile, few hours ago.

Just to reiterate what Don said, we haven't had any material impacts on our operations or projects. Our QB cathode operation is continuing. As you pointed out, CDA remains on strike and that operation was suspended before these protest started and our QB2 project remains in full construction and we do have still 5,000 people working on the site. We're basically managing some minor impacts around logistics and shift changes and we're really focused on the safety and security of all our employees and contractors. We do have curfews in place. Obviously the situation we're monitoring very closely. It is quite dynamic and volatile, but to-date, we've had no major or material impacts. I don't really want to get into any details on comments on the negotiation, specifically with CDA but all our employees and contractors are accounted for and safe.

And maybe if I could ask about the NCIB that you announced a couple of days ago. I mean, when we were at site at the Highland Valley tour. I know you guys made the point that the existing or the previous I guess NCIB sort of satisfied at least the minimum obligation or a commitment that you had made two capital returns under the capital allocation framework that you rolled out in the summer, so I was a little bit surprised to see this new NCIB and I was wondering if you could maybe speak a little bit to your strategy for how you're going to be buying back shares, maybe for the rest of this year. If you are going to be buying back shares or if this is more in place as something that is a longer-term program that you're thinking of maybe more for 2020?

So the announcement that came out just recently is a normal regulatory announcement. Once a year, we have to formally renew the program and get approval from the regulators. So that's all that announcement was the NCIB that we have discussed before, is still in place and we will continue with it watching market conditions as we go.

Thank you. And the next question is from Greg Barnes with TD Securities. Please go ahead.

I just want to investigate the planned outage in half one, 2020, the coal operations, obviously lower production. You said demand in Q3 remains strong. I don't know what conditions look like in Q4. I know prices are weak. But is this purely just a reflection of your expectation of a weaker coal market through at least the first half of 2020?

No, this is an operating strategy. I'll go back to Robin on this.

We plan to take the -- we plan every year to take the plants down for maintenance outages. That combined with upgrades that we're doing at the Elkview plant. We've chosen to schedule those earlier in the year simply to take advantage of what potentially might be a weaker market. The other side of it is as we do the upgrades at Elkview, the sooner we can do those upgrades the better because every day after the upgrades obviously, we're able to produce more coal. So it really is just a timing issue around that.

And in terms of production next year. Can you give us some idea of first half versus second half percentage wise?

Really, I'd like to, I guess, wait, certainly for the Q1, it will be roughly the same as...

We are going to do that with the guidance -- I mean, I know, Greg, you know this. These are very short term questions. We are doing something that's a net positive, gets us to a stronger coal division sooner at lower cost and we're able to get it done a little sooner, so we are going to do that. But to sort of really focus on this quarter, next quarter, I think that's premature.

Thank you. The next question is from Chris Terry with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

In terms of the coal congestion at port. I just wondered if you could talk specifically around when the Neptune just will be complete. And also just in the answer to it, if you could just make clear the CapEx remaining and your share of that and just what's been spent to-date and whether there's any significant scope changes? Thanks.

Just before I turn it over to Alex, the construction completion is scheduled for Q1 of 2021 and I think, over to you Alex on the percent of capital still to go.

Yes, so we have provided some new guidance here in the release here as we work towards our definitive cost estimate. We see cost increasing to just under CAD800 million. Right now, we've spent slightly over CAD200 million to-date of incurred and have little over CAD300 million committed under contracts.

And then maybe one for you Don, just overall, as you've looked at QB3 and now that QB2 construction is actually started perhaps you can give an update on that the bridging and your latest thinking on how QB3 fits in with QB2? Thanks.

So we're working on the scoping study for QB3 looking at a number of different development models ranging from an increase in capacity of QB2 of about 50% in one version, which would be sort of a Phase II, all the way to a triple or even quadruple because there's clearly such a vast resource there. We'll finish that scoping study this quarter and then take a hard look at it and probably move into pre-feasibility quite quickly. It is very promising and has a number of advantages over QB2 just benefiting from QB2's infrastructure and so on. And when we get to that point, I will release more details about at that time.

Thank you. The next question is from Timna Tanners with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

I mean, we just wanted to take a step back and ask Don the high level question about country risk, given that you've touted your company's focus on areas with less country risk, and then I just wanted to ask if that impression is changing at all with some of the recent uprisings in Chile and also some of the maybe company specific project challenges in Peru?

Yes, I think that's a fair question. I think until a week ago Chile was still thought of as the probably the leading country in South America in which to invest and has had a great track record the last 20 years to 30 years and obviously attracted major investment from our industry, which has been by and large very successful. And we believe and have faith that Chile will remain that in the long term. We're encouraged that for example, our employees are back in the office yesterday working as normal. And we've had no effects on any of the operations in the country to speak of. So until you see some longer term evidence that something has significantly changed then I think that's the position that we take. Likewise, Peru, of course, I mean geologically is a tremendously up -- trust country for the lots of opportunity. We have one of the best mines in the world there in Antamina and a really good development project in Zafranal. We've had a good experience there. And while we see stress and strain from time to time in different communities, just as we were seeing now in Chile and by the way which we see in Canada, different provinces from time to time, I think at this point, there is nothing to change our perspective that those are two very good countries to invest in. If you compare the current challenges that those countries are facing to challenges that are happening elsewhere in the world, this helps bring things into perspective and we won't be changing our position quickly but we will watch it closely. And yes, the recent developments are concerning.

Thanks and sorry to be a broken record, but I keep asking about some of these copper project, Satellite, I think. And I just wonder if you can give us any updated thoughts on the emphasis or the timing, if they're getting pushed out any or back burnered or if you're continuing to move ahead with some of the pre-feasibility stages? Thanks.

We're continuing to advance those projects towards different milestones, such as pre-feasibility and feasibility and we are receiving calls of other companies that are interested in either buying or partnering or co-developing and that's where things -- so those conversations are ongoing, so nothing, nothing has really changed. We have reduced the budgets for next year consistent with our cost reduction program, but we're still advancing it to get to those milestones. And there's some pretty positive results in cases such as Zafranal and San Nicolas that are near term, so steady as she goes.

Thank you. The next question is from Lucas Pipes with B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead.

I wanted to revisit the strip ratio comments for the coal segment and I believe you were referring to a clean coal strip ratio. So I was wondering to what extent the improvement in the strip ratio is driven by better yields at the wash plant versus geology? I would appreciate your thoughts. Thank you.

Maybe that's the first time we have ever got a question. Very good, Lucas.

The short answer is geology. The yields at the plants are pretty much where they are. We do expect some improvement in yields. We've got a number of different projects with RACE21 and and some of the upgrades at Elkview certainly will help improve yield, but the bulk of that change in strip ratio is really around just less waste move per ton of coal, we produce.

I'd encourage you to ask that question, Lucas, a year from now, to be interesting. Lucas Pipes - Riley, FBR I hope, I will see it in the results before then. So thank you very much for that answer. Just to turn it maybe to the broader met coal market. I don't think there has been many questions on that, maybe Real, could you comment, what you're seeing obviously it's been really volatile over the -- over the summer and I would be curious, what do you see as the next [Technical Difficulty] or what could be a catalyst? Thank you.

Lucas. Thanks for that. I guess what we're seeing broadly in the market yes, sure, the prices have corrected. But I would not say it's a weak market for coal, pricing is still just under CAD150 million which is by all measures, still a decent price and we've seen demand quite resilient and hot metal production is up just under 4%, year-to-date August. So we're continuing to see demand from our customer base. If we look at the various markets that hot metal production is especially strong in India, Southeast Asia, in China, which is more than offsetting the reductions that we've seen in Europe, Japan and the Americas. If we look into 2020 compared to 2019 so the World Steel Association is forecasting steel demand to grow 3.9% in 2019, 1.7% in 2020, but the interesting point in the number for 2020 is that growth outside of China is expected to still be 2.5% in 2020 and most of that is coming from India and Southeast Asia. We've also seen reduced steel exports from China, so that is supporting domestic production in the other countries. So all in all, we see demand for our products continuing to be fairly strong and customers are continuing to nominate vessels in line with our contractual commitments.

Thank you. The next question is from Oscar Cabrera with CIBC. Please go ahead.

I was wondering if you could just given the fact that you seem to be a lot more cautious with your cost reduction programs, how are you thinking about your capital allocation with regards to returning cash to shareholders on when we move into 2020?

So nothing has changed with regards to the capital allocation model that we laid out in detail, I guess, four months or five months ago and so you can run your models and come up with whatever available for return to shareholders based on what we disclosed previously. In terms of cost reduction program, I mean, we saw a pretty steep decline from $210 down to a low of $128 before bouncing back to $150 or so. So in that kind of environment and with trade wars, Brexit issues all sorts of global stress and strain it seem prudent that we should initiate a cost reduction program and do it quickly, get on with it, get it done. So that's what we did.

And then if I may, just a follow-up on that. In terms of the RACE21, we are expecting or almost completed savings or CAD150 million in 2019, is that number for 2020 an additional CAD250 million?

Oscar, you're coming through in a very muffled manner. But I think I got the question on one, the CAD150 million past due value that we've disclosed on RACE21. So foreign investment one-time investment of CAD45 million, we will improve various aspects of the operations, such that EBITDA of CAD150 million or greater on an annualized basis will be in place by December 31 this year. For next year in February, we will disclose the target for the end of 2020 and we will do the same for 2021 and they -- those numbers will be substantially larger than the CAD150 million. The CAD150 million is the first go with this, we're right in the midst of implementing some of the things on the process side of the flow sheet. Really results are very exciting. So we're very pleased with the targets. We obviously going to try and exceed them, but we will be able to report in detail on those results at the February Investor Call.

Apologies for the line Don. So is the additional RACE21 for 2020 included in the disclosed CAD500 million that you have in your release today?

No, I need to emphasize this once again, and I'm pretty sure we made it very clear in the release. CRP of CAD500 million is entirely separate from RACE21, it will be reported on separately, completely different actions that we're taking. RACE21 is all about innovation and doing things differently in different aspects of our operations. We will report the results of the two programs separately, and there is no overlap, no double counting… [Technical Difficulty] …factors at play. First of all, you talked about domestic production in China, domestic coal -- coke and coal production in China, is down again in 2019 and that trend is continuing. With respect to the market and steel makers, you would have seen that the iron ore price has been quite high. It's come down recently. But it is still at a level that is putting pressure on steel maker's margins and at the same time, steel prices have also come down. So steel makers are looking for relief where they possibly can get it and to your point on overall supply, Australian supply is up around 6 million tons year-to-date. They are still not back to pre-Debbie levels forecast is for somewhere around 183 million tons production this year compared to 189 million tons pre-cyclone Debbie. When you look at other markets you're right, Mozambique is down -- they are down. Valley is down somewhere around 30% year-over-year at the end of Q3. So that's 1 million tons lower. In the States, the exports have declined, somewhere between 1 million tons and 4 million tons depending on which source you use and WoodMac is forecasting that they could be down as much as 7 million tons this year and there is a few mines that have actually been idled so far hard coking coal mines total of somewhere around 1 -- 1.5 million tons of production or so in 2018 from those mines that have been announced to be idle this year. So it's a number of factors that have impacted the coal price and maybe one of the last one is, every time we see a quick correction in the coal price, there is a dramatic increase in the number of transactions that we see reported by the assessment providers that is probably a result of traders offloading positions and maybe to a lesser extent some opportunistic purchasing from some steel mills. So that's what we're seeing out there.

So if steel output is up 8% to 9% in China but the coal supply is not up, is it reasonable to infer that the Chinese steel mills must have liquidated a half a month's or more of met coal inventories. And iron ore as the iron ore output looks to be down 6% and it appears that steel mills have liquidated about one month of iron ore supply inventories and process?

So it's difficult to get precise numbers on China. But what we know for sure is that seaborne imports year-to-date at the end of August are up over 3 million tons, so they are still continuing to purchase coal from the seaborne market and that's also helped by the arbitrage, the domestic coal is actually around CAD30 or so a ton more expensive, than the seaborne.

Thank you. The next question is a follow-up question from Greg Barnes with TD Securities. Please go ahead.

On the active water treatment facilities, you noted in the release today that you expect Fording River to be the last one you build, to be replaced I assume by SRF or something else. When do you think you're going to be able to in a position to give us a clear view on what the strategy will be in terms of CapEx and OpEx profiles going forward?

Robin will fill in some details, but nothing really has changed from what we announced last quarter, the government has endorsed Saturated Rock Fills and we are building the Elkview facility, it will be in place by the end of 2020 and presumably will operate very well as it has so far to date or for some time. And that that will then give the government confidence to continue to allow us to substitute Saturated Rock Fill for water treatment plants in the overall plan that we have with the government. So looks -- looks very good from here and that's how we're thinking about it, which is why we have that disclosure in this quarter. Rob, do you have anything else to add on that -- is it?

Not really, I think -- maybe just to add that the -- we're already in the process of designing and initiating early works on the next Saturated Rock Fill at Fording River, which would, which will extend the water treatment required. In addition to what we're building at Fording River South, as was the plan before. So our strategy is very much linked to Saturated Rock Fill is now is the best.

Yes, really, in fact we down tools on engineering for the water treatment plant at the other Fording River quite some time ago, three months or four months ago. So yeah, we're proceeding on that basis, Greg.

There was some big CapEx numbers associated with active water treatment that in the guidance you've given us before. I'm just trying to get a sense of when we can get some update on those numbers now that SRF looks like it's the way you're going to go?

Well, I think the update is the same that we've said that the CapEx for Saturated Rock Fill is around 20%, maybe 25% of what of active water treatment plant and the OpEx is about half that remains the same and we're proceeding with Saturated Rock Fills, we can't give you like a five year forecast without having government approvals, of course, and they're going to do it one at a time until they've really seen -- seen it running for some time and we expect that. So I think you have the information already, it's a question of whether you choose to use it.

Thank you. The next question is from Mark Levin with Seaport Global. Please go ahead.

So going back to Neptune just circling back to Neptune in the comments that you made in the report about the increase in CapEx. Can you maybe provide some more color as to what's behind that increase. Is there going to be an increase in the amount of capacity available to you? I think you had mentioned before that you would be going from current capacity of 12.5 million, up to 18.5 million, does that change with this increase in CapEx or is there something else behind it?

We have stayed with the 18.5 million public target, we certainly believe as we have said before that we will do much more. But I'll turn it over to Alex for the specifics of what's behind the increases.

So Neptune right now, we're about 80 -- just little over 80% engineered and 30% construction and just in the process of completing a definitive capital cost estimate, which we expect to have finished during the fourth quarter. So the initial indications coming out of that cost estimate are that the costs are going to increase to just under CAD800 million and there's a number of factors really is to have driven these increases. The first and foremost is really site-specific conditions. So as we were working on the site, there has been some challenging subsurface geotechnical conditions. As we get out of the ground, those end up getting behind us. We also have some productivity impacts of constructing within an operating terminal. So really with respect to access to work fronts, ability to have lay down and then just worker productivity in a congested site. We have some costs for additional project scope and some admissions that weren't included in the original estimate. We sanctioned the project back in 2017 at about 5% engineered. So we've had quite a bit of engineering design evolution and change and cost associated with those as we progress from that basic engineering level to our current 80%. We have seen some cost related to some of the scheduled changes over the last year as well as some of the -- so we're putting some cost into -- to continue to maintain and accelerate schedule that includes things like night shift, longer weeks et cetera, and then we have some additional cost related to escalation as we bring the dollars forward to the current year as well as some -- we have actual pricing out from contracts and materials. All those are included in this definitive estimate which -- which was currently underway, and we should be able to confirm these when that's complete.

And maybe just to refresh the real value of what we're doing. This will be enormously valuable to Teck for three main reasons. I mean, first, the operating cost will be significantly lower and much closer to our competitors in Australia, and that will be an enormous ongoing savings for the length of the mine life in decades. So net present value of that in itself is huge. Second, and just as important, maybe even more valuable. Is that we will then have consistency of delivery and when coal prices are high, we won't be put it to back online and watch thermal coal go ahead of us. We will deliver our product and capture the high margins when they are available. And so that will be worth hundreds of millions of dollars to us in some years because it has cost us hundreds of million dollars in recent years. And then third, we will be able to deliver the consistent quality, our high-quality hard coke and coal will not be contaminated and that is very important to our customers, as you know everywhere in the world customers are getting more demanding in terms of quality and that's just something that we have to keep up with and it will be much easier to do at Neptune. So we look forward to getting.

That makes sense, all that stuff -- all that makes perfect sense. Don. So is there any reason why you wouldn't shift the lion's share of your coal away from Westshore to Neptune given all of those factors or is there a reason why you would want to keep your -- keep it among different ports?

Well, you've seen the scope of the project the -- we've announced 18.5 million tons. We think we'll do a lot more. So you can assume we will be moving the lion's share, I think you want to diversify risk in some form between other ports that are available, and so we probably do some, but that remains to be seen. Those decisions will be made some time in the future.

Last question to you, just a clarification one on QB2, so I think you mentioned in your remarks that you would expect to have an updated capital estimate in February. Was that correct?

In Q1 we said...

In Q1, I'm sorry. When you report earnings next, my apology…

I am not sure, exactly when in Q1 whether it's February or later, but why don't we just say Q1.

Thank you. The next question is a follow-up question from Orest Wowkodaw with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

I'm just thinking about the potential CapEx spending for next year. And it seems like there's a lot of moving parts with the deferrals on one hand saving capital but then higher capital related to Neptune coming into the budget next year, should like outside of QB2 spending, which is obviously, ramping up. Should the rest of the business -- should we think about it as largely kind of flat from a CapEx perspective, because there's a lot of offsetting components next year?

I just want to repeat again, while there are some CapEx deferrals. The bulk of things are cuts -- actual cuts in CapEx that won't recur. So Ron Millos, over to you.

Yes, you know, it's, we're in the middle of the budgeting process, Orest. So it's hard to really comment on exactly what's going to come out. But the order of magnitude, the sustaining and the deferred stripping, which is the main capital buckets before some of the odd items have been historically about CAD1.2 billion a year and they go up and down in any given year depending on the nature of the projects, but I think it's probably best to wait until we give the guidance in Q1.

So operator, Atlanta, I think, we're -- come to the end of our time and maybe we will turn this back over to Don for some closing remarks now.

Just before we wrap it up, I would note that when we get together next in February one of our key executives will have retired by then, and that's Andrew Stonkus, our Senior Vice President of Marketing, Sales and Logistics. I just want to publicly thank Andrew for a tremendous career with Teck over 30 years. He's made a wonderful contribution and for many years he has been the lead guy in the world in setting the benchmark treatment charges in the zinc industry and certainly, he can retire with great pride and tremendous accomplishments and contribution to Teck. And succeeding Andrew will be our own Real Foley, who of course many of you have been asking him questions on this call. And frankly, he's been dominating the conversation for many years on the price of coal. He is widely respected in the market by the customers and competitors as well as was Andrew in zinc. And so we are very fortunate to announce his promotion to Senior Vice President, Marketing, Sales and Logistics and so congratulations, Real, and we're counting on you.

And with that, thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to talking to in February.