Good afternoon. My name is Brika, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Teradata Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I would like to hand the conference over to your host today, Chad Bennett, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Development. You may begin your conference.

Good afternoon, and welcome to Teradata's 2025 Second Quarter Earnings Call. Steve McMillan, Teradata's President and Chief Executive Officer, will lead our call today; followed by John Ederer, Teradata's Chief Financial Officer, who will discuss our financial results and outlook. Our discussion today includes forecasts and other information that are considered forward-looking statements. While these statements reflect our current outlook, they are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risk factors are described in today's earnings release and in our SEC filings, including our most recent Form 10-K and in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, that is expected to be filed with the SEC within the next few days. These forward- looking statements are made as of today, and we undertake no duty or obligation to update them. On today's call, we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures, which exclude such items as stock-based compensation expense and other special items described in our earnings release. We will also discuss other non-GAAP items such as free cash flow, constant currency comparisons and 2025 revenue and ARR growth outlook in constant currency. Unless stated otherwise, all numbers and results discussed on today's call are on a non-GAAP basis. A reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP measures is included in our earnings release, which is accessible on the Investor Relations page of our website at investor.teradata.com. A replay of this conference call will be available later today on our website. And now I will turn the call over to Steve.

Thanks, Chad, and hello, everyone. Teradata delivered well in Q2, as we continue to see improved execution across the company. We delivered total ARR of $1.49 billion in Q2, up 2% year-over-year as reported. That gives us additional confidence in our ability to achieve our full year targets. We are seeing improvements in linearity in both expansions and renewals resulting from the go-to- market actions that started in the middle of 2024 to improve our sales execution. We experienced better deal execution in Q2 with some deals closing in the quarter that had been expected in Q3. We see customers recognizing the importance of and the value of strong data management capabilities to underpin their AI and GenAI initiatives. We meaningfully improved overall retention rates again in Q2, and we expect this to continue for the full year 2025. Thanks to the team's positive efforts in managing ongoing contracts with customers, we were able to extend some contracts into the back half of the year. From a cloud perspective, we delivered ARR of $634 million as we see contingent migrations and expansions. The solid 15% constant currency cloud ARR growth is in line with our full year guidance range of 14% to 18%. I'll start the quarterly update with the new executive leadership members we recently brought on. During our last earnings update, we introduced Sumeet Arora, our new Chief Product Officer, and I'm pleased to have John Ederer, our new CFO, on the call today. In the quarter, we also announced Scott Rogers as our new Chief Administrative Officer, as we streamlined our people and law functions. These veteran executives are here to help our ongoing strategic execution as we position the company to accelerate growth and deliver ongoing durable free cash flow. They have proven track records and…

Thank you, Steve, and good afternoon, everyone. In the second quarter, we finished above the high end of our recurring revenue outlook range at the top end of our total revenue range and earnings per share outperformed our expectations. Total ARR grew 2% year-over-year on a reported basis and was flat from a constant currency perspective. Our cloud ARR growth rate was 17% reported and 15% in constant currency, and our cloud net expansion rate was 112%, performing in line with expectations. We continue to see a balanced mix of migrations and expansions driving our cloud ARR. While acknowledging the boost from currency this quarter, we did achieve total ARR growth sooner than anticipated this year, as we're able to pull in a few deals early and extend other customers from a retention perspective. The timing of these deals will have some impact on our Q3 ARR metrics, but we continue to believe that we are on track to achieve total ARR growth in Q4 on a constant currency basis, and we are reiterating our FY '25 outlook for total ARR, cloud ARR and free cash flow. In terms of our detailed financial results for the second quarter. Total revenue was $408 million, down 6% year-over-year as reported and 7% in constant currency, which was at the high end of our outlook. Recurring revenue was $354 million, down 4% year-over-year as reported and in constant currency, which was 1 point above the high end of our outlook. Upfront recurring revenue had a negligible impact on the growth rate. Recurring revenue as a percentage of total revenue was 87%, up from 84% in Q2 last year. Services revenue was $51 million, down 19% year-over-year as reported and 20% in constant currency. While the services business has been a headwind this year…

[Operator Instructions] The first question we have on the line comes from Erik Woodring with Morgan Stanley.

John, welcome aboard officially now. So Steve, I wanted to circle back with you. You made a comment right before you passed it to John that I thought was interesting. And you said we see an opportunity for greater operating leverage and free cash flow looking forward as you optimize your OpEx envelope. Can you maybe just unpackage that comment a bit for us just to kind of help us understand what you mean either from a size, a texture or even a timing perspective? And then I have a follow-up, please.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Erik. And maybe John could add a little bit of color commentary as well. So clearly, as we're going through the year, we've optimized our cost and expense envelope. And we're going to continue doing that as we go through the rest of the year. The key driver for us though and something that we're pretty confident and given our execution in first half is clearly returning the company to growth. And the execution that we've had in the first half of the year has given us some surety in terms of our outlook to returning to total ARR growth in FY '25. And so from an operating perspective, I think we've built the foundations for durable free cash flow growth and that is then being compounded by our ARR -- our outlook to grow our ARR in the full year. And as those reflect -- both reflect into our outlook for FY '26. We see that durable free cash flow growth is a real opportunity for us to drive forward into the future. John, I don't know if you want to add anything.

No, I think that's very well said. I wouldn't add much in terms of specific numbers for FY '26, but I would say that I think we are laying the foundation this year. We're taking the actions that we need to. We talked about some of the things specifically in the second quarter, but we're really setting ourselves up to have a strong finish to this year and then look out to next year as well.

Okay. And maybe I should have asked these questions in reverse order because Steve, I wanted to get after kind of what you alluded to, which is from a kind of top line and demand perspective and client engagement perspective, what's next, right? You highlight solid execution in the first half of the year. Obviously, a couple of moving pieces between 2Q and 3Q. But solid execution is what you need to do today. But what's next? How are you playing kind of offense from here? Help us understand -- help us kind of dream the dream, so to speak, of where is this model in this story can go as you think about the changes you've made over the last 12 months and the dividends that they could pay out over the next 12 months, so to speak?

Yes. And I think the changes that we put in place in terms of go-to-market execution midyear last year, have made a good delta in terms of our overall execution and sales execution in the market. But underpinning that really is the underlying demand for the Teradata technology set and especially in our ability to execute in a hybrid environment. That open and connected ecosystem that can expand across both on-prem environments and cloud environments is something I think that's resonating very well in the marketplace and very well with our customers. And I think the age of AI and agentic AI is really powering that as well. So I think that is setting us up to address a new target addressable marketplace from an AI workload perspective. And our most recent announcements with AI factory, which is an on-prem solution to deliver AI solutions for our customers and their most trusted environment behind the firewall as well as having those capabilities extend out into the cloud gives us some real opportunity to drive growth and workload usage on the Teradata platform, both in the cloud and on-prem, and those 2 factors together will enable us to drive forward. In addition, we've done a really good job over the last 4 to 5 years, growing our cloud business to over $630 million now, still got really good growth rates from a cloud perspective. We reported 15 points year-on-year growth in Q2. So really solid growth there. And we do see the AI workloads from an on-prem perspective helping stabilize and actually get some growth in the on-prem marketplace. So these together actually set us up for good subsequent future growth.

Your next question comes from Tyler Radke with Citi.

Steve, maybe first one for you, encouraging to hear some outperformance on ARR in the quarter. It sounds like a lot of it was timing related pulling in some deals from Q3. But was just curious, was there -- was this sort of driven by the customer? Was this more just better execution in terms of managing the sales pipeline? And did you see these deals like come in stronger than you expected as well, just in terms of the expansion potential? I assume there was -- these are cloud deals because the cloud sequential growth was pretty strong? But just anything you could expand upon in terms of the deals that came in? And then if you're expecting now like any type of headwind in terms of sequential growth into Q3?

Yes. Yes, we're really happy with the team's performance in Q2. Deal execution was clearly ahead of the pace. And obviously, whenever the sales team can, they will close a deal as early as we can. The team has been doing a lot of work on linearity and making sure that we improve linearity. And therefore, execution in the first half and in Q2, in particular, has given us a lot of confidence in terms of execution for the full year and getting back to total ARR growth for the full year. The dynamics that we see is actually our customers want to take advantage of the Teradata platform. And they want to do that both on-prem and in the cloud. And we saw good growth in the quarter in both of those facets, both behind the firewall and also in the cloud. The hybrid capabilities of our platform and how we're presenting that platform in our customers' environments in terms of being the trusted custodians of some of the customers' most valuable data making that available to AI solutions and say the customer environment, I think it's really driving some interest and workload for us and it's given the sales teams an opportunity to take a really powerful value proposition to our customers, especially when we combine that with the offers and capabilities that we've got. Again, what I would say is, as we execute through and look at the second half of the year, it has given us some faith in terms of returning the company to that total ARR growth in FY '25.

Okay. Great. And then on the margin side, I mean, it sounds like there were some optimizations in the quarter. I know you talked about kind of to move away from service -- lower-margin services revenues and then some consolidation within the go-to-market function, but it didn't look like you really raised profitability guidance too much. So just curious, is there kind of more conservatism in that? Are you sort of redeploying some of those savings into R&D and just kind of help us understand as you assess the cost base here, like what the timing for kind of additional steps and unlocks could be?

Yes, sure. This is John. I'll take a stab at that one. So I would start off by saying, I think we're doing a good job overall on managing expenses up and down the P&L. If you look at some of the revenue headwinds that we have this year that are implied from our guidance to be able to be tracking towards an operating percentage that's on par with last year is no small feat. And so I think the team has done a great job of managing this along the way. In terms of some of the specific operating expenses, on the SG&A side. Steve mentioned some of the actions that we took last year, that actually resulted in a year-over-year decline in terms of dollars spent on SG&A. We did reinvest some of that back on the R&D side of things. And so we're going to continue to invest in innovation that will support our profitable growth strategy. But overall, I think we're doing a good job of managing expenses and like we said earlier, laying the foundation for durable free cash flow growth.

Your next question comes from the line of Radi Sultan with UBS.

Maybe first for Steve. As you think about the second half of the year, just curious, what do you see as the biggest catalyst behind migrations to Vantage? And then is there any way to think about what portion of those migrations are related to a GenAI use case?

Yes. Thanks for that question. I think I would point to 2 market shifts of note in terms of our customer conversations that we're having. The first one is we're starting to track a significant pipeline of AI-influence growth for the Teradata platform. And we're seeing these workloads being deployed both on-prem and in the cloud, and that's really playing to our strength of having a hybrid platform, having a platform that can run these workloads on-prem and give customers real capabilities around AI with trusted data and great data management on-prem. And then a lot of our customers that migrate and deploy in the cloud with us retain a hybrid model. And that's something that really differentiates us from an execution perspective. And then I think the second shift in terms of cloud migrations is we are seeing a reduction in the number of what I would call pure-play cloud migrations, where the customer is looking to migrate to the cloud to generate some form of cost optimization. I think a lot of customers are realizing, the value of the cloud comes from the flexibility and agility and the services that are available in the cloud rather than a cost play. And so I think our customers are being more sensitive to where they are migrating their data to make sure that they get the best value out of that. We've talked in the past about some stage migrations that is really manifesting now in the use of Teradata's hybrid capabilities. There's a bank in Australia, which has deployed across the cloud and on-prem utilizing QueryGrid to link all of its data together across a fairly complex environment. And I think we're seeing our customers start to take advantage of those hybrid capabilities that only Teradata can bring to the marketplace. So I think these together, those market shifts together are helping us deliver that cloud growth of 15% in Q2 and also pointing us in the right direction for total ARR growth for this year.

Awesome. Super clear. And then a follow-up for John. Given this is your first quarter as a CFO, just curious like what did you see in your first few months at Teradata that gave you confidence in underwriting the current guidance framework, especially those linearity comments around Q3 and Q4?

Yes. I mean I think there's almost 2 different questions in there. So just in terms of the guidance overall, I think we looked at several things. But if I kind of step back and take a look at where we are at the midpoint of the year, I feel like we're in good shape. We've actually executed well against the plan and did a little bit better than anticipated on the ARR metrics in Q2. So that certainly helps. I think the second factor is our -- the work we've been doing on erosions. Last year was a difficult year from an erosion perspective. We've actually had quite a bit of improvement this year. And so when you think about that from a modeling standpoint, that really helps in terms of the overall visibility. So I think as we sit here at the midway point, we feel good about the execution we've had over the first half, and that gives us a better sense for how well we can do over the course of the year. The last couple of things I would point to is just the new products are really starting to generate some interest, especially AI. And so Steve just talked through all of those, but we're starting to see those come into the opportunities that the sales team is working on. And so I think all of those factors come together to help support the second half outlook. Obviously, we need to still go out and execute, but the opportunity is there.

Your next question comes from Chirag Ved with Evercore ISI.

Steve, what are you noticing about how companies are thinking about on-prem versus cloud deployments in this AI world, especially when it comes to modernizing their data estates and how this might be similar or different from what you might have seen or heard over the past year?

Yes. I think the world of agentic AI is really powered by access to data across environments. And I think we're seeing a lot of our customers, especially the very large customers across the world, thinking about how their data estate is deployed and then we're working out what the modern access and management capabilities that we want to put in place to actually execute AI workloads against those data. So the great thing about the Teradata platform is that we can preserve data gravity. We give customers the choice of deploying either on-prem or in the cloud and get the same capabilities and the same great function and -- features and functions, both behind the firewall and in the cloud and operate in that hybrid environment. And I think we're tending to see an increase in the interest in terms of our on-prem platform. I think we're seeing some new logo activities where we're selling net new systems on-prem, especially in regions and markets where data sovereignty is incredibly important. And so having a capability that enables customers to take advantage of the most recent AI models, be it large language models, operating on-prem and executing that with the trusted data management and governance capability, which Teradata supplies is really driving some customers' decisions about where they place their data and how they get access to those AI applications.

And maybe one quick one for John. It looks like cloud net retention rates dropped sequentially. Do you see cloud growth in fiscal year '25 being more driven by new cloud customers and net new migration or by stabilization and/or expansion in the metrics?

Sure. Thanks for the question. Yes, I would say it's probably more of the latter. And so we've continued to see pretty consistent results in terms of the drivers of growth. And so we've got roughly 50% of our cloud ARR growth coming from migrations and about 50% coming from expansions. Now that can vary a little bit by quarter. But in general, that's the trend line that we see and that's what we would expect to see for the rest of this year.

We now have Matt Hedberg with RBC Capital Markets.

Steve, you started the prepared remarks talking about agentic AI and how you're thinking a lot about it from a Teradata perspective. I'm curious, how would you expect to monitor usage or success from a customer base there because it seems -- obviously, it's a topical conversation among customers. And how would you define success there?

Yes. I think we're defining success on a couple of dimensions. One, I'll talk about partner. From a partner perspective, we're engaging with a number of partners that are very successful and critical in terms of executing this AI world. And so the 2 examples I gave were ServiceNow and Salesforce. We're super excited about the partnership that we have with ServiceNow, and ServiceNow are excited about the partnership with Teradata because they see the opportunity to utilize, analyze and for Teradata to develop the signals out of customer -- the customer data is an example that we have in the Teradata platform and then to trigger workflows in the ServiceNow platform or trigger workflows in the Salesforce platform to actually get some form of execution. So I think one of the dimensions is the work that we're doing with partners in terms of leading edge use cases and the development of leading edge use cases. The second is the proof of concept that we're doing with customers. So early customer engagement in terms of the advanced technologies that we've got. So some of the work that we're doing in terms of customer complaint analyzer, taking some of our vector capabilities and utilizing vector capability as well as running language models, both inside the Teradata environment, but also sitting next to the Teradata environment. And I gave some examples in the prepared remarks of a bank in Australia that is doing just that in terms of combining structured SQL-based insights from a data perspective with some language model capabilities to look at how they impact their overall customer satisfaction is a great use case. And then the third dimension is really looking at our opportunity pipeline. We started measuring and managing the opportunity pipeline in terms of opportunities that are being influenced by AI workloads inside our customers and that's really driving utilization for the Teradata platform and say the customers. So as we look at holistic execution in this AI and agentic AI marketplace, we're really rapidly advancing some of the capabilities that we need. For example, we've recently announced our new MCP server that will enable us to work in the agentic space. And that was a direct result of some of the work that we're doing with our customers and the deployments that we're getting engaged in. So super excited about really an incremental target addressable marketplace for us from an AI perspective.

Great. And then John, for you, curious if you -- what sort of the thought process on the recent R&D tax changes? Do you think that might have an impact to you guys next year? Any way to kind of think about the potential benefit of that?

Yes. I do think there could be some impact from that, and it will probably show up on the cash flow side of things. It's a little too early for me to give you specifics on that, but it's definitely something that we're taking a close look at and it's something that could impact -- positively impact cash flow this year as well as next year.

Your next question comes from Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America.

Steve, on the Teradata AI factory, how do you see the revenue there evolving? And how much revenue uplift could you see from this over time? Curious if you could share maybe any color on the pipeline, the type of customers? Because investors have generally been waiting for some traction in enterprise AI adoption. So given your comments about that fitting in on-prem, how do you think that evolves? And I have a follow-up.

Yes. Just -- thanks for the question, Wamsi. Just to educate all, AI factory is our capability that brings the power of AI to enterprise that are looking to deploy and scale artificial intelligence solutions with trust, control and speed into hybrid environments. So that's both on-prem and in the cloud. And there's a lot of benefits that, that gives to our customers in terms of enabling them to actually really deploy real production-oriented workloads and solutions from an AI perspective. Clearly, it's early days in terms of our release of the AI factory, but we are very excited, especially when we look at our partnership with organizations like NVIDIA, where we can take an NVIDIA GPU farm and essentially place a dedicated Teradata instance running our capabilities from the AI factory perspective, leveraging that GPU instance to run real AI workload on-prem with trusted data for our customers. So early days from a revenue perspective and ARR perspective, certainly seen a lot of interest in that in the marketplace, and we're excited about how that's going to drive in the short-term usage of the Teradata platform, but then longer-term, dedicated Teradata instances, both in the cloud and on-prem to deliver these workloads.

Okay. And maybe one for John. I'm sorry if I missed this, but can you talk about the magnitude of what you think were deals that got pulled forward from Q3 to Q2? Clearly, obviously, you highlighted some in -- on the public cloud side. But in overall terms, how would you quantify that magnitude? And would -- should we expect to see some of that behavior persist given some of the more broader macro uncertainty around tariffs and other things like that?

Yes, sure. We did not quantify the magnitude, and I won't give you a specific number here, but I will describe kind of the shape of what we're talking about. And I think this was an earlier question, my apologies, I neglected to come back to it. So in terms of cloud ARR, we actually made great progress in Q2, and we're a little ahead of schedule as we were able to pull in a few of these deals early and extend some other customers. And I think the company had previously commented that we expected the first half of the year to be towards the bottom end of our annual guidance range for cloud ARR growth. And so we came in a little bit better than anticipated in Q2. But with some of that timing, we've effectively changed the slope of the curve for cloud ARR this year. And so at the beginning of the year, where we are expecting a more linear path from Q2 to Q3 to Q4, we've now had a bigger step up in Q2. We'll be a little flatter in Q3 and then we'll step up again in Q4. And so I think that's probably the best that I can quantify it for you here. We don't typically provide quarterly guidance on these metrics, but we did want to give you all the heads up in terms of this change in dynamic.

Your next question comes from Derrick Wood with TD Cowen.

This is Jared Jungjohann on for Derrick Wood. So understanding that 8-figure deals have been excluded in guidance, can you talk to what you've been seeing with these larger engagements?

Yes. Thanks for the question, Jared. I think we characterize it by really derisking our outlook from an 8-figure deal perspective. The good news is that from a sales execution, our go-to-market team has a number of paths to get to our outlook for the year, both from a cloud perspective and a total ARR perspective. Our absolute focus, though, is to drive growth in total ARR because that's really going to give us the profitable revenue growth into next year in terms of growing our recurring revenue stream. The profitability of our recurring revenue streams is certainly the most profitable segment that we have. And that will obviously lay the brand work for some durable free cash flow growth as we move forward. The execution that we've seen in the first half of the year in terms of both retention perspective and get meaningful improvement in retention against that outlier from a retention perspective in 2024 has set us in good stead in terms of that execution. And then in terms of just taking advantage of the market opportunity that's in front of us, the hybrid opportunities. I've seen that on- prem has some real strength in terms of being able to deliver meaningful growth. And then just the fact that we've now that, that big cloud business will go over $630 million and as we grow that at mid double-budget, mid-teens in terms of growth for this year, that has some meaningful growth impact to our numbers as well. So a number of different paths to execute in terms of both 8-figure deals and some smaller deals as well. So we're pretty confident about the execution as we move into second half, and the sales team is doing a great job.

Okay. I appreciate that color. And then one more for me. I believe you guys started to introduce open table formats in early 2024. So now that we're a little bit along with those efforts, can you just talk to -- for the customers that have adopted these, how have those companies' ACVs been trending?

Yes. Our OTF strategy has always been to support both Apache Iceberg and Delta Lake without walking any of our customers into one structure or another. And so given that real choice of deployment, I've always stated that I believe that open table format would actually be a tailwind for us in terms of the more data that you make available to the Teradata platform and the Teradata engines, the more usage of the platform that we'll get and therefore, that incremental usage driving bigger Teradata systems and execution. And certainly, as we've continued to increase our analytics capability and portfolio, I talked about the ability to bring your own language models into the Teradata environment and combining that and opening up as much data as possible and say the customer environment really does give us a tailwind from an execution perspective. So I think as our customers are looking at open table format and the open table formats that they've got into their environment, they're working out how to use the Teradata platform to execute that analytics strategy and all of the analytics functions we've got inside the Vantage platform against that data source. And just as an example of doing that, we've got a customer in Latin America who actually replaced the Databricks analytics solution with using Vantage Analytics to actually run highly performant analytic capabilities at a fraction of the cost and incremental improvement in performance. So we see the opportunity to help customers modernize their data and analytics environment and an open table format continues to be a tailwind for us.

We now have Raimo Lenschow with Barclays.

This is Sheldon McMeans on for Raimo. First for Steve, can you help further contextualize the improvements in retention rates you discussed in your prepared remarks? And maybe how should we think about the drivers of that between better sales execution, maybe some of the AI-related solutions that you've come out with that shows your future-proof road map? And then just general improvement in the macro environment because it does seem like we're past kind of the peak uncertainty on the tariff front.

Yes. I think just from a retention perspective, and as we said all along, we did know that 2024 was going to be an outlier from an erosion perspective, particularly in our on-prem business. And looking back, we actually started to see those improvements in the second half of 2024. We saw that improvement continue in 2025. And as we said all along, as we looked at the guidance that we gave for full year at the start of the year, we're going to see that, and we expect to see that meaningful improvement to our retention rates for FY '25 overall. I think you're absolutely right from a tariff and a macro perspective, we've done an assessment as our cloud business grows, that is a lot of them more immune from a tariff perspective. And then from a macroeconomic environment, I think there has been some scrutiny on discretionary spend that's impacted our consulting billings at the start of the year, as we've spoken to already. But I think we are starting to see a lot of more confidence from a macroeconomic perspective, and we're expecting good execution to continue and deliver good full year 2025 result.

Understood. And I believe in the prepared remarks, it included commentary about a quarter-over-quarter decline in ARR expected in Q3. I would love to hear what are some of the driving factors of that as I would think that the pull forward from Q3 into Q2 would be relatively neutral as that would be on the Q3 balance there.

Yes. That was some of the comments that I made just a few minutes ago. But in general, we're expecting to see change in the slope, if you will, for this year. So where we have expected to see a more gradual climb, particularly in cloud ARR through the year, where we saw a bigger step up in Q2, a little flatter in Q3, and then we expect to see it step up again in Q4. In terms of total ARR. We're actually tracking a little ahead of the plan. We are hoping to get back to positive territory by the end of the year. We actually got to positive growth this quarter, now with a little bit of help from currency. But even on a constant currency basis, got back to flat this quarter. And so I think we're tracking pretty well. We may see a slight decline in total ARR in Q3, but feel like we're very much on track for the full year.

We now have Patrick Walravens with Citizens Bank.

This is Nick on for Pat. Steve, one for you to start. NVIDIA recently published a research paper highlighting the efficiency of SLMs for handling more routine agentic tasks. Is this consistent with what you're seeing across your customer base? And are you noticing increased interest or adoption of SLM for enterprise and get workloads?

Yes. That's a great question. In fact, we are seeing customers deploy small language models like Hugging Face to get specialized results. So it could be in terms of looking at customer feedback or call center interactions. So instead of putting that through a large language model using a really specialized small language model. The really excite thing for us is our massively parallel architecture that we deploy on-prem and in the cloud is really well suited to run in the small language models. So actually in some test with one of the banks in the U.S., we actually ran the Hugging Face model on our parallel CPU architecture and it actually ran better than running on NVIDIA DPU. So this was clearly very exciting for our customer in terms of utilizing a small language model and the Teradata environment very effectively and efficiently to get some really great business outcomes. So yes, we absolutely see the small language models has been a good opportunity for us. And it really emphasizes the words I used were open and connected. We don't want to be locked into any one particular language model as some of our competitors have done. We want to be able to enable our customers to have a full deployment choice and to use the language models in the right place, whether that's behind the firewall or in the cloud. And they can choose which language model to use both in terms of size, but also in terms of what brand to use, yes? So that's the great thing about having that open and connected ecosystem.

Fantastic. That's super interesting. And one follow-up, John, for you. It's been around 3 months since you were appointed as CFO. What is one thing that's gone better than you expected and one thing that's been more challenging than you expected?

Sure. The -- well, I'll start on the positive side of things. And I think that you look at the Q2 results, and we obviously started off with a solid quarter, so that makes my job a little bit easier coming in. On the other side of the coin, it's just a matter of getting to know a new business. And so there's a lot to learn when you come into any new company. And I do think there are some complexities to what we do here at Teradata, both from a technology standpoint as well as from a business model standpoint. So getting up to speed on all of those elements is something that I've been very focused on the last few months.

I can confirm that does conclude the Q&A session. And I would like to hand it back to Steve McMillan for his final remarks.

Thank you very much, operator. And thanks, everyone, for joining us today. We remain absolutely focused on profitable revenue growth, and we believe that our differentiated hybrid analytics capabilities are going to deliver that for us. We're super excited about the opportunities ahead as companies move into production with AI and its agentic AI initiatives. It's a real additional opportunity for us. We're looking forward to executing. Thanks again all for joining us today.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.