Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Welcome everyone to the BlackRock TCP Capital Corp’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. During the presentation, all participants will be in listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the company's formal remarks. [Operator instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Katie McGlynn, Director of the BlackRock TCP Capital Corporation’s Investor Relations team. Katie, please proceed.

Thank you, Charlie. Before we begin, I'll note that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements based on the estimates and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those projected. Any forward-looking statements made on this call are made as of today, and are subject to change without notice. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2021. We also posted a supplemental earnings presentation to our website at tcpcapital.com. To view the slide presentation, which we will refer to on today's call, please click on the Investor Relations link and select Events and Presentations. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-K which was filed with the SEC earlier today. I will now turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Raj Vig.

Thanks, Katie and thank you all for joining us today for TCP’s fourth quarter 2021 earnings call. I will begin today's call with a few comments on the market environment, as well as highlight some of our fourth quarter and full year 2021 results. I will then turn the call over to our Chief Operating Officer, Phil Tseng, who will provide an update on our portfolio and investment activity. Our CFO, Erik Cuellar will then review our financial results as well as our capital and liquidity positioning in greater detail and I will then close with a few concluding remarks. After our prepared remarks, we will all be available to take your questions. Turning to the current market environment, in prior calls, we have expressed our view that in general, private capital markets performed well during the pandemic and that direct lending, in particular, emerged as a well-positioned source of financing for a wider spectrum of middle market companies. We continue to believe that that is the case. Activity during Q4 and full year 2021 was among the busiest in our over two decades of investing and current activity levels in the middle market remain robust. We work with a broad range of businesses, as they seek to finance growth, make acquisitions or simply refinance existing that with greater earnings power. As such, we believe that our shareholders continue to benefit from our efforts and expertise, as our direct lending investments deliver a premium source of income and an attractive risk reward position relative to other fixed income investment categories. I’d now like to review our fourth quarter performance and discuss a few key highlights for 2021, a year in which our team again delivered strong results for shareholders. First, we had strong NAV appreciation. Year-over-year NAV per share increased…

Thanks, Raj. Moving on to our investment activity, while the number of direct lending managers has grown in recent years, we remain one of a small group of reputable lenders capable of providing complete and customized financing solutions. As such, we emphasize transactions where we act as the lead, co-lead or part of a small club with lenders negotiating deal terms and conditions that we believe provide downside protection on our investments. Also of note, our team is generally finding opportunities to invest at higher spreads than the average middle market transaction. This is a direct result of our extensive, long standing set of relationships developed over the past few decades, as well as our industry specialization, which our deal sources value and enables us to assess and underwrite risk well. We source an increasingly large set of investment opportunities. And while we've been actively deploying capital in this market, we maintain a very disciplined approach to investing. We regularly review a substantial number of opportunities but we end up investing in only a small percentage of them. As an example, while we reviewed nearly 1000 potential investments across the US private capital platform in 2021, we invested in fewer than 60 of them. Investment activity in the fourth quarter was robust for new deployments, as TCPC invested $182 million, primarily in 19 investments, including loans to 11 new portfolio companies, and eight existing ones. Follow on investments in existing holdings also continued to be an important source of opportunity, accounting for nearly 40% of our total investments in 2021. Incumbency has clearly become an important factor in sourcing investments. And from a risk management perspective, these are companies we already know and understand well and therefore are very comfortable making these follow-on investments. As we analyze new investment opportunities,…

Thanks, Phil. I will now cover our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year in 2021. For the fourth quarter, we generated net investment income of $0.31 per share, which exceeded our dividend of $0.30 per share. And for the full year, we generate a net investment income of $1.26 per share, out-earning our dividends for the year by $0.06. We continue committed to paying a sustainable dividend that is fully covered by net investment income. And today, as Raj noted, we declared a first quarter dividend for $0.30 per share. Investment income for the fourth quarter was $0.69 per share. This included recurring cash interest of $0.59 cents, recurring discount and fee amortization of $0.02, and PIK income of $0.04. Notably, our PIK income for the year was the lowest level in more than three years. Investment income also included $0.02 of dividend income, and $0.02 from accelerated OID and exit fees. As a reminder, our income recognition follows our conservative policy, both generally amortizing upfront economics over the life of an investment, rather than recognizing all of it at the time the investment is made. Operating expenses for the fourth quarter were $0.31 per share and included interest and other debt expenses of $0.17 per share. Incentive fees in the quarter totaled of $3.7 million or $0.06 cents per share. Our net increase in net assets for the quarter was $32.6 million or $0.56 per share, which included net unrealized gains of $21.4 million, or $0.37 per share, partially offset by net realized losses of $6.5 million, or $0.11 per share. Unrealized gains during the fourth quarter, primarily reflected a $10 million increase in the value of our investment in core entertainment, a 5 million increase in Edmentum and a $2 million increase and Razor Group.…

Thanks Erik. To conclude, we are pleased with our fourth quarter and full year results and are confident in our team's ability to deliver strong ongoing risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders. We also remain cautiously optimistic regarding current investment environment. While we have seen an increase in volatility in the public markets to start the year, like the [indiscernible] concerns around inflation, supply chain disruptions and uncertainty around rates, transaction volumes in the private markets are healthy and revenue and EBITDA growth trends are strong across the middle market and our portfolio. In this environment, we are leveraging our team's competitive advantages, including over two decades of experience lending to middle market companies. Our long track record combined with our industry specialization makes us a unique and valuable partner, to our borrowers and deal sponsors. In addition, our experience in structuring loans that are downside protected has contributed to exceptional long-term performance. These advantages enabled TCPC to deliver a 17.5% ROI in 2021 and a 26.9% ROI since the start of the pandemic. And with that, operator, please open the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] We will now take our first question from Kevin Fultz of JMP Securities. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, and congratulations on a nice quarter.

Thank you.

So as you mentioned in your prepared remarks, you were able to lower the overall cost of capital in 2021 by issuing the 2.85% unsecured notes and then also amending the credit facility. Just curious if you see additional opportunity to lower financing costs and what that might look like, particularly with the convertible notes maturing in early March.

I can take that one. Yeah, we definitely continue to watch the markets. Obviously, it's been a tough week so far. But we always look to the capital markets and opportunistically reach out to the markets, as we've done in the last few years. As we mentioned, we're very well positioned to take out our converts, which are coming up due next month and those are the highest tranche so far in our capital structure, so those are coming off the balance sheet. We can very well repay those with our credit facilities, which have a significantly lower cost than the converts, but we definitely continue to monitor the capital markets.

Okay. That’s helpful.

Kevin, I would just add that we've certainly tried to keep sufficient flexibility in the balance sheet to do just what Erik was mentioning. So we're not holding or requiring to just take them both to market, prices at that point in time. But we will continue to opportunistically look and monitor. I think there are an increasing number of investors getting familiar with BDCs than in the past, so I think that's a positive, but overall we feel comfortable where we are and have the flexibility to deal with the upcoming debt.

Okay, understood. Thanks, Raj and then just a follow up question relating to interest rate sensitivity. Could you provide the weighted average LIBOR floor for floating rate investments?

Sure. That’s 90 basis points, 0.9%.

Okay, 90 basis points. That's it for me. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks, Kevin.

Great. Thank you.

The next question comes from Robert Dodd of Raymond James. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Congrats on the quarter. Just a question about prepaid income, right. I mean, over the long term average, you've averaged about a nickel in prepaid for each quarter. Over the last eight quarters, there's only been one quarter that's actually hit or exceeded that. Has there been anything – structurally anything that's changed in the portfolio to results in lower levels of prepaid income or is it just -- it's that part of the cycle, so to speak? I mean, there's been other periods where it's been low for a while as well. And obviously, you said you've seen limited in Q1 so far, but I mean, any color on -- is lower the new normal, or do you expect it to rebound at some point?

Yeah. Thanks, Robert for the question and the compliment. I think it's a very good question. We certainly discuss it on our side. I think the shorter answer is, there isn't anything that is changing the portfolio the positioning, I think it's just a lower level and to be honest, on the one hand, it's a positive because we're keeping money outstanding with companies we know and are comfortable with longer. From a risk point of view, it's you just having that experience lets you make the right types of decisions. On the other hand, you're not picking up that income that is more episodic, but to be honest, it is a smaller and smaller portion of income and we found a higher NII overall, so the run rate. NII is actually a higher quality as well. But the other side of it is, as Phil mentioned, something like 40% of our deployment is coming from the existing names. So not only are the names staying outstanding longer, we're actually adding onto them at an increasing level. Again, a positive in my opinion, because you're putting money out to companies and credit you know. So I don't know that it's necessarily any structural change or positioning of the portfolio; it does feel like, winners are staying winners longer and just the rates rising or more likely to rise, people are less actively refinancing opportunistically. So maybe there's an element of that, but, overall, it isn't something that we're doing consciously and I think there's a lot of benefits to it but it is a notable difference from prior periods, as you mentioned.

I appreciate that detail for that. I mean, the point on the incumbency, do you have any data about you -- do you have data supporting an evidence that being 40% incumbent borrowers produces better credit protection for investors or is it, I don't want to say, it's easier to do an incumbent borrower, it's not. But is there actually upside from a credit protection in doing that in the data or does it feel that way?

Yeah, let me -- I'll start and Phil may have additional comments. But I think on the one hand, the data we've looked at, maybe it's not tied to incumbency specifically but maintaining a 1% or less non-accrual level through what is obviously a notable credit risk cycle in the pandemic, I think, it's proof in the pudding of doing something right. I think anytime we add on to a loan, we do have a chance of going back and either tightening up -- you get a chance to underwriting in many ways, because you can go back and tighten up the documents, if that's appropriate, you have a chance to -- you'd have a history of credit performance through prior earnings and on a closely watch basis. So I think intuitively, it feels like that is certainly something that's credit enhancing, or at least a chance to go back and reassess your original estimates and underwriting. I think the data I would point to is just the overall performance of the portfolio, I wouldn't -- it's isolated to the incumbents, but certainly the incumbents are a pretty big part of that, driving that empirical output. But Phil may have some additional comments, in addition to my observations.

Yeah, Robert. Thanks for that question. I'll just add to what Raj was saying. Oftentimes, in the situations where we do provide an incremental loan to existing borrowers, we have a seat at table, and we're often negotiating and structuring favorable situations for us, whether that's through the document, whether that's through pricing or other structural considerations. Pico is a great example where we had an opportunity to tighten things up and we had an opportunity to really diligent the add-on target that the company was contemplating acquiring, and we're very pleased with the outcome of the due diligence. So, that's a great example of wanting to put good money after good investments. And oftentimes, in these situations, for add-ons, generally, the equity sponsor is also putting in additional capital to continue supporting the business and funding, let's say, the acquisition or the growth. So these are often good situations, in our opinion, to invest in.

I appreciate that. Thank you, and congrats on the quarter again, and the year -- and the two years really.

Thank you, Robert. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Christopher Nolan of Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Is there a timing -- excuse me, in the event of a rate increase by the Fed, would there be a timing difference between revenues increasing as opposed to what your interest expense could rise.

Hi, Chris. This is Erik. Yeah, I see there's a very small timing lag, most of our loans reset quarterly, some of them monthly and so any pickup in rates would kick in at the next reset date, so either the next coming month end or quarter end.

Okay. And then as a follow up question, strategically, for much of the past year, I mean, you guys have posted some really good returns, but your stock prices lagged, more often trading below book value per share. And I'm trying to understand where are you guys sort of thinking about how to increase the stock price multiple? I mean, performance is not the issue, is something else, like to hear your thoughts on that.

It's funny, I was going to ask you the same question, Chris. [Multiple Speakers]

[Multiple Speakers] input but offline, but you guys are doing great but I think at the same time the stock price is struggling.

I appreciate the observation and I don't want to speculate. I guess, what we've tried to -- what we can control, we've tried to control and I think that is portfolio selection, investment performance, positioning for the rate environment. So I think we've done what we think is appropriate, and while we're disappointed where the stock is, at some level that's all we can do and we're hoping people pick up on the same comments that you mentioned, and we'll just continue to try to maintain that performance. I don't know that I had a magic answer or sort of a targeted set of observations, other than observing the same thing you observed but we're just going to keep trying to perform the way we think investors would like us to, and hopefully things follow in a positive way from that.

Okay, I'll take it offline. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Ryan Lynch of KBW. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. First one just wanted to hit on, obviously, there are a lot of different worries and concerns in the market but maybe the one that's probably most focused on is just inflation issues, both labor and potentially raw material or input cost inflation. Your portfolio looks like it has a lot of services, different sort of services, industry exposure, so maybe it's less of a worry, but as you guys are kind of evaluating your portfolio and then borrowers, are there any particular companies that you guys have noticed that they may have a harder time passing along those higher input costs to the end user and you're more concerned about going forward?

Yeah, that's a good question. And I think your observations are astute and that much of our portfolio is services, there's a lot of technology, and just general business services. And what we do at the time to underwriting even before inflation became kind of a topic of the day was really make sure we understand that there is pricing power on the revenue side in these companies, whether it's on the subscription revenues or its actual pricing per engagement for certain risk companies. And we don't have a lot of heavy manufacturing, so the other concern these days is supply chain and input costs. And I think there's not a lot of exposure in terms of we're touching companies that those issues will hit. So I think we're comfortable that these companies have that ability. I think the one thing that we are watching more closely is not so much on the inability of pass on pricing, but it's really labor, labor and wage inflation. And obviously we underwrite a fair bit of buffer and conservatism, so to the extent there is in normative increases in that area or other inputs these companies and these capital structures can handle it. But I wouldn't sort of highlight any one company or an area that other than a normal course that we feel is upsides exposed. In fact, I think we have less exposure to some of the topical issues, but I can't point to any empirical evidence, it's just more intuition.

Okay. That's good to hear. And another question was, you guys mentioned a $10 million unrealized gain in core entertainment. Can you talk about what drove that increase in value in that portfolio company?

Sure. Phil, you want to take that one or you want me to take it.

Yeah, go ahead, Raj.

Okay. Basically, it was a sale of a business, so it was actually a value tied to an actual transaction value, strategic acquire. And so I think that highlights in many of these names where we have some equity – our equity exposure, we try to tend to value them reasonably, if not conservatively. And Edmentum was another example where we obviously seen consistent markups and oftentimes tied to cash investments or cash-related transactions, but core to be specific was tied to a sales price of the business to a strategic buyer.

Okay, gotcha. Well, congrats on that successful exit. That's all for me today. I appreciate the time.

Thank you.

There are no further questions on the line at this time. So I'll hand the call back over to Raj Vig.

Thank you. We appreciate your participation on today's call. I would like to take a moment to thank our team for all the continued hard work and dedication, particularly through the pandemic and all the challenges it posed. I would also like to thank our shareholders and capital partners for your confidence and your continued support. Thanks for joining us. This concludes today's call.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.