Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the TrueBlue Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today Derrek Gafford. You may begin.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining today’s call. I’m here with our Chief Executive Officer, Patrick Beharelle. Before we begin, I want to remind everyone that today’s call and slide presentation contain several forward-looking statements, all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, some of which are described in today’s press release and in our SEC filings, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements. We use non-GAAP measures when presenting our financial results. We encourage you to review the non-GAAP reconciliations in today’s earnings release or at trueblue.com under the Investor Relations section for a complete understanding of these terms and their purpose. Any comparisons made today are based on comparisons to the same period in the prior year, unless otherwise stated. Lastly, we will be providing a copy of our prepared remarks on our website at the conclusion of today’s call, and a full transcript and audio replay will also be available soon after the call. With that, I’ll turn the call over to Patrick.

Thank you, Derrek, and welcome everyone to today’s call. Before I dive into quarterly results, I wanted to take a moment to reflect back on 2019. This past year had its share of challenges evidenced by a 5% revenue decline and a 4% net income decline. Some of the revenue decline was expected and came from a smaller number of large clients that simply experienced issues within their own businesses. As the year unfolded, we saw a broader softening in revenue trends similar to other industrial staffing providers as clients pulled back in response to lower volumes. While overall job data was positive for the United States, the contingent portion, which makes up 2% of the workforce, experienced the pullback as businesses use contingent services more sparingly in light of rising economic uncertainty. While we cannot control the macro environment, we will continue to focus on what we can control, which includes balancing smart cost management with strategic investments. I am pleased with the success of our cost management efforts in 2019. In total, our selling, general and administrative expenses came down by more than $25 million, or roughly 5% compared to the prior year. In the third quarter, we announced a set of cost actions that are expected to result in approximately $8 million of net annualized savings during 2020. At the same time, we’ve been making targeted investments in sales and marketing to drive long-term growth. One example is PeopleReady’s new client experience team. This is a dedicated team of professionals focused on client care and retention by proactively reaching out in the critical early days to understand their satisfaction and help the clients to move up the curve in terms of JobStack usage. While the program is still relatively new, the feedback from our branch based colleagues…

Thank you, Patrick. Total revenue of $591 million was near the low end of our $587 to $612 million outlook. Total revenue was down 9%, which was larger than decline in Q3 of 6%. Approximately one percentage point of the step down was due to the roll off of project work that positively impacted Q3, but did not continue in Q4, and the remainder due to softening demand trends. Lower than expected revenue was offset by efforts to deliver lower than expected SG&A expense resulting in earnings per share results that were in line with our expectation. Net income per diluted share of $0.23 was in line with our $0.18 to $0.28 outlook as well as adjusted net income per diluted share of $0.39 in comparison to our outlook of $0.35 to $0.45. EPS was down 38% and adjusted EPS was down 36%, primarily as a result of previously disclosed headwinds, which contributed about 25 percentage points to that EPS decline. The effective income tax rate for the quarter, a 7% was below our 14% expected rate primarily due to additional tax credits. Gross margin of 25.4% was down 110 basis points from lower gross margin in our PeopleScout business and our staffing business. Half of the consolidated gross margin drop was due to previously disclosed headwinds at PeopleScout and the remainder in our staffing business associated with a prior year payroll tax benefit and additional costs associated with a shorter holiday peak season. Our disciplined approach to managing costs showed in our results this quarter. SG&A expense was down $11 million, $1 million of which was due to lower adjusted EBITDA exclusions and the remainder from lower cost in the core business. SG&A was down 8% and SG&A as a percentage of revenue was up 30 basis points. Throughout…

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Jeff Silber. [BMO Capital Markets].

Thank you so much. In your prepared remarks, you gave us a little bit of color on intra quarter trend in trend going into January. I think it was mainly just for PeopleReady. I’m just wondering if you could talk about the other two segments as well that would be great.

Sure. Yes. Thanks Jeff. I’m going to just give a little bit, since you’ve asked the question, a little bit more color on PeopleReady and I’ll do the same for the other segments. We’ll maybe start off with the other segments. We’re expecting to see continued improvement in the PeopleManagement trends. To put this into perspective, third quarter was down 12% and the fourth quarter is down 7%. Our guidance, the mid point of it is assuming that we’ll be down about 2.5%, which is right. And kind of line with how we think of what we’ve seen in January will trend itself out. So you take that and some of the wins we’ve had, we were optimistic about what the rest of 2020 looks like for PeopleManagement, for PeopleScout, we’re anticipating that the decline will get about five points worse going into Q1. We expect to still see some pressure in our UK business around the Brexit vote. Our UK business, in addition to having some RPO business has some communications related business, doing legal notices and so forth for the government. And we expect that to continue to be slow in Q1 but pick back up, going into Q2 and the rest of the year. The PeopleReady trends are the ones that were the most encouraged by where there is still recent trends we’ve been seeing some nice turn in the demand trends, still negative, not where we want them to be, but we finished – the quarter, finished up at down 9% for PeopleReady. In December, adjusted for the Thanksgiving holiday, down about 7% and our outlook for Q1 is for the business to be down about 5.5%. So, and that’s on top of – Q1 last year was a pretty decent quarter for us. At least us in relative comparison that’s the only quarter we had growth in PeopleReady at a positive 3%. So we’re pleased to see the trend. We do get into some easier comps with PeopleReady, more work to do here, but we’re encouraged by what we’ve seen over the last few weeks.

Okay. That’s really helpful. I appreciate the color. When you were discussing PeopleReady, you talked about softening demand and I think specifically you noted construction and manufacturing. Can you just remind us as a percentage of that segment or the synergy of the company, whatever you have in front of you, what those two verticals represent. I’m just wondering were there any verticals within PeopleReady that actually grew?

Sure. One second here. So I’m going to just

Rough numbers.

I’m going to give you what the mix of business is for our core construction business, which excludes any energy related work and then manufacturing. So these are, this can be for total company and then I’ll go over to the PeopleReady trends in a moment. So overall construction for all of TrueBlue represents about 17% of the business and manufacturing overall represents about a 21% of the business. If we go over to PeopleReady and we’re taking a look at all of the verticals that we serve, basically all of those verticals we’re in some form of decline. We do have some energy related business and that did grow. But the range of this to give you, they range pretty widely from the segment of the industry vertical that had the least amount of pressure was hospitality, makes up roughly of PeopleReady’s business about 10% that was down 2%, whereas the manufacturing business for PeopleReady, down 23%. And that makes up, about 11% of the business.

Okay, great. I appreciate that color. Let me just, one more quick follow-up and then I’ll jump back in queue. You called out the UK weakness in the people soft business. Can you just remind us what percentage of that segment is UK and do you have any of the exposure in the other segments? Thanks.

Yes, that business runs between $50 million and $60 million of revenue for us. I think we’re closer to $50 million, $55 million little North of $55 million in that business.

And that’s the only segment where you have UK exposure.

Yes, that’s right. Yes. I’m sorry. I called the people soft, PeopleScout that’s what I meant. But you understood. Thank you so much.

Jeff. This is Patrick just a little more color on the UK. What really happened over there is, was when that new election was called, we saw some real softness in October and November. And partly because as Derrek mentioned we’re pretty heavily weighted in the government sector there and so we saw a pullback from those clients that are government related, from the time the election was called and until the results actually came in. We’ve actually seen a little bit of a bounce back in December and January versus what we saw in October, November. And it had – a lot of it had to do with the business that we have over there with those government clients where we’re doing a lot of talent advisory work and they just put those on hold for that couple month window that it created a headwind for us in Q4.

Okay, great that was really helpful. Really appreciate all the color. Thanks.

And your next question comes from John Healy with North Coast Research.

Thank you. Derrek wanted to ask a question of, about the cost management. I think in the slides you guys talked about kind of managing SG&A levels to the revenues of the business and understand there’s probably some productivity savings, but there’s – with the digital transformation you guys have going on. But understand there’s probably some investments as well. So just trying to think about how hypothetically we should think about SG&A levels this year relative to revenue. So hypothetically if your revenues were down 5%, on an enterprise basis, what sort of level do you think SG&A would move and what sort of revenue decline is to pronounce that you kind of match the SG&A to the revenue.

Yes. Thanks for the question John. So I’m going to directly answer your question in just a moment but I’m going to give just a little bit of background that I think may be helpful to you and to others. So 2019, was definitely a year of a lot of costs and cost disciplines. We reduced operating expenses. I’m referring to sales, general and administrative expenses here by $28 million. So a lot of that was good blocking and tackling. We also did some things that I would call more reform related where we did some, a little bit of restructuring, a fundamental in some of the businesses, particularly PeopleReady. And our last one that we did larger scale was in the third quarter. That individual action will create about $8 million of cost savings in the PeopleReady business in 2020. I just give that as background because what we feel like we’ve done at this point where the demand levels are, is as far as any wider restructuring actions, cost-wise, we feel like we’ve done what we needed to do. Don’t get me wrong. Costs are still important. We’re still managing those in a disciplined way, but we don’t feel like we need to do anything big right now. We want to make sure, we want to make sure that we got the businesses kind of right size to demand, but also not to go too deep to where we weren’t ready to respond when the environment turns. So we think we’re in about the right spot from a more strategic perspective when we take a look at the costs. Now that that said, going into Q1, I mean midpoint of our revenue guidance is a decline of about 7%. We’ve got SG&A declining at about that amount to, you’ll – I would suspect unless other things happen that that kind of decline in SG&A expense will taper itself off because we’re still getting some heavy benefits from the cost actions that we have done in the past. However, the general rule, while this would vary by quarter and now we feel like we would like to manage the business on a particular revenue decline, whatever that is and percentage points, the SG&A be declining by about the same, about half, half that amount. So, for example, if revenue was down 4%, we’d be managing to operating expenses down about 2%. That would of course be lumpy, based on different timing of the quarter. But I think that’s a general rule, that we try to manage to and I think is applicable as we look forward in 2020.

Okay, great. Great. Makes sense. And then, I think you guys made the point, I think you said this is the third year in a row where you guys returned over $30 million of capital to shareholders. As you look at the business in the state that’s in today, do you feel like that it’s more prudent to kind of keep the cash for yourselves and kind of wait for a rainy day? Or do you think that share repurchase and those options are going to continue to be as high on the priority list as we’ve seen in the past?

Yes. Thanks for the question, John. I appreciate you asking this and just for everyone here, I know that John is aware of this, our strategy has really become much more organic focused over the last two or three years versus if we went back three years plus you saw a lot more acquisitions. And, that’s really a strategic decision on our part because we think that digitally transforming the business right now is the most important and the highest return activities we can be doing. So, what all that means is that the cost that we’re putting into digital transformation while we’re investing there is certainly much less capital than going buying companies, which leaves us with more capital to return to shareholders. So we plan to stay active in this. We don’t want to build up a lazy balance sheet. So we’re planning on continuing to stay healthy and returning healthy amounts of capital back to shareholders. We want to make sure we’re doing some of that consistently, but we also want to make sure we’re doing it opportunistically as well. And the balance sheet is in great shape, we’ve got about a third of a turn of EBITDA on the balance sheet as debt. We feel like we could take on some more debt to buy opportunistically as well. We wouldn’t get too far ahead of ourselves. Maybe turn-up to the debt in today’s environment but those are our latest thoughts on use of capital and our thoughts on share repurchase John.

Okay. Thank you guys.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from Kevin McVeigh from Credit Suisse.

Great. Thank you. I wonder – you had mentioned Derrek, I think a couple of client losses in the quarter. Just any context around that and is there any client loss factored into that Q1 guidance?

Well, what we’ve been reporting on, Kevin, I want to make sure I’m clear about this. We’ve been reporting on some headwinds of client losses that we have going back. Really the main client losses or headwinds, we’ve called them out, and ones where we’ve lost a couple – that are continue to be headwinds right now or a couple of clients that we lost at PeopleScout; one, because they got acquired and another who’s just a large aerospace manufacturer that’s having a lot of problems. And those are the two main headwinds we’ve had. They weren’t lost clients necessarily in the quarter, the ones that proceeded this quarter. But they were significant enough that we wanted to call them out because of the impact on the company trends and PeopleScout. And some of that we’ve provided in our investor materials, a look at how that continues to provide a little bit of headwind going into 2020. But I want to pause there and make sure those were the client losses that you were referring to, Kevin.

They were. And just any sense of when those should kind of start to run off Derrek, or when do you think they would ultimately not as impactful if you could?

Yes, it’s really down to the one large aerospace manufacturer at this point. And so we’ve laid it out by quarter, I won’t go through all of that with you. But the big picture is, we’re expecting about $11 million of revenue headwind from that client in 2020, which would be about roughly $6 million of EBITDA headwind. About half of all that headwind happens in Q1 and then tapers itself off over Q2 and Q3 and drops to no headwind in Q4.

Got it. And then just any thoughts in terms of the guidance relative to the macro environment overall? There’s always the sense of how you end the year in December and then ultimately start backup in January. So like January the trends are a little bit better, but just any thoughts from a client perspective, how the discussions are going from a macro perspective?

Well, for us, we’re certainly not experts on the macro, more experts on running our business. And what our history has told us as far as the macro is that our PeopleReady business is a very, very good leading indicator of some of the macro trends, particularly when it comes to more macro trends in blue-collar industries in industrial space. Largely because of this, the PeopleReady – the work it’s a collection of small projects that sometimes lasts for days or a few weeks versus much longer assignments. So we tend to see – we think the positive turn quicker than some others and also when things drop off. This is probably our most – if we were to talk about our thoughts right now going into the first quarter versus our thoughts in second, third or fourth, we’re feeling much more optimistic than we were over the last three quarters. The trend changes that we’ve seen, they’ve been very recent. So it doesn’t – there’s still at least some questions for their sustainability versus what we’ve seen over the last nine months, 10 months with demand slipping and seeing positive traction here. It’s very encouraging to us. And I’ll also say that the demand trends improvements that we’ve seen, I’m talking about the decline that PeopleReady getting smaller that pickup it’s been very widespread. It’s been virtually across every industry between the middle of December and where we stand now. So small amount of time, but widespread, which we feel is encouraging for our results. And we think if our results are lifting, it will probably carry over into what you see in some of the macro factors as well.

Kevin, this is Patrick. I’m just going to follow-up on the first question you had to Derrek around PeopleScout. If you look at Q4, PeopleScout was down in terms of raw dollars, about $12 million on a year-over-year basis, about $8 million of it was that aerospace manufacturer that Derrek mentioned. We had another $2 million or so in the UK. So those two things make up the bulk of the decline. And one of the trends that we’re seeing that has us concerned is, in PeopleScout we’re winning a lot of deals. In 2019, we had nearly 60 new clients, but the relative size of those wins has been a lot smaller than what we’ve seen historically. So that’s something that’s having an impact on our year-over-year growth rate is, we’re used to winning a lot of deals that are big. And what’s happening right now is we’re winning a lot of deals that are small coupled with that aerospace headwind coupled with the UK headwind. And that’s the results that we find in Q4 and our outlook for Q1. So we’re working hard to take those smaller wins that we’ve had and turn them into larger clients with expansions of scope and the like. And so that’s a big part of what’s going on with PeopleScout.

That’s very helpful. Thank you so much.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from Josh Vogel with Sidoti & Company.

Thank you. Good evening, Patrick and Derrek. I apologize, I hopped on the call late here. So if any of these questions or commentary is redundant, I’m sorry. My first question I had is, last quarter you talked about rolling out some new features, I believe on JobStack in the first quarter of this year, something that could help drive more candidate flow. And I’m curious if that’s still the plan and also are there other strategies or capabilities that you’re looking at with regard to your digital business model?

Yes. Thanks, Josh. Related to the new features, what you’re referring to is our onboarding. Today the onboarding is done through some other systems that then flow into JobStack. And so one of the areas that we’re focused on is creating a much more frictionless process, when we onboard candidates and then ultimately hire them and move them into billable assignments. And so that’s a big area focus for us. Our target is to have that implemented right at the end of Q1 or early Q2. And so we’re working hard on that. We think that’s going to help our supply quite a bit. And that’s particularly relevant in a tight candidate market like we’re operating in today. In terms of other strategies, probably the biggest one is something I alluded to in my prepared comment is, our focus on heavy users of JobStack. Which today, heavy users roughly account for about 15% of client revenue at PeopleReady. And when you take out clients that are new and you take out clients that have been lost and you look at an apples to apples year-over-year comparison, what we’re seeing is that those clients are running at roughly 20 points – 20 to 25 points higher in terms of growth rates on a year-over-year basis. So they’re running at in the 20s in terms of growth rate and the rest of our clients are running in the negatives. And so a big area focus for us in 2020 and beyond is to convert more clients that are non-users of JobStack to become more heavy users. So in Q4, that actually created a couple of points of lift for us, our results would have been even weaker without the heavy user stack. The other thing that we’re seeing among those heavy users…

That’s helpful. Thank you. Again, I apologize if I missed it. But are you still expecting to achieve a net $8 million in annualized cost savings in 2020?

Hi, Josh. Yes. Thanks for the question. So as far as the cost savings that we went through on the PeopleReady organization and the savings that were generated out of some of the restructuring activities that we did in Q3, we are expecting $8 million of savings from that action that will carry into 2020.

Okay. Thank you. And then if – what if we see a more pronounced or unexpected step down at some point this year. I’m just curious how dynamic you could still be in managing the cost structure outside of that $8 million.

Sure. Well, we talked about the $8 million that’s carrying into 2020. In 2019, we carved out $28 million of operating expense. So I think we’ve got some track record here and being able to go through and rightsize the SG&A based on where we are. However, with every step down it does get harder. It gets harder and some of the actions carry more risk. And what we’ve really been trying to avoid in our cost reduction efforts up to this point is being very careful about any cost reductions involving employees that are directly serving or selling to clients. And so we’ve really tried to do those outside of the branch network and I think we’ve been very successful in that at PeopleReady, which is where we’ve had the most pressure. So to that degree, we take another step down, we’ll be able to take some more costs out. Will it be in the same rate to revenue? I’m not sure. When I say the same rate to revenue, I mean our expenses were down almost as much as the drop in revenue. So I don’t know if we could keep a one-to-one match for that, but we’d certainly make progress and we’d have to go into some other areas that might carry a little additional risk. We’ll be able to respond if things turned down more.

Thank you. Just one last one, looking at your outlook. Outside of PeopleScout, you note of incremental improvements at PeopleReady and PeopleManagement. So there’s no other itemiser or you can say client related headwinds that we should expect as of today at PeopleReady or PeopleManagement?

No. What we’ve provided in our 2020 outlook, just we’ve got one client that we reported on in 2019 that was creating headwind for the company and it’s continuing in 2020. So we’ve broken that out. Certainly we win clients and we lose clients, but there’s not any big client loss or anything that’s on the horizon that we feel like we need to call out. So if there were something like that, we’d let you all know. But that doesn’t exist at this time.

All right. Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions guys.

Thanks, Josh.

[Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call back over to Patrick Beharelle for closing remarks.

Well, thank you, everyone. I appreciate you listening in to our fourth quarter earnings call. We look forward to chatting again next quarter. And have a great week, everyone. Thanks.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.