Good afternoon. My name is Jesse, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the TrueBlue Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Derrek Gafford, CFO you may begin your conference.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. I'm here with our Chief Executive Officer, Patrick Beharelle. Before we begin, I want to remind everyone that today's call and slide presentation contain several forward-looking statements, all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, some of which are described in today's press release and in our SEC filings, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements. We use non-GAAP measures when presenting our financial results. We encourage you to review the non-GAAP reconciliations in today's earnings release, or at trueblue.com under the Investor Relations section, for a complete understanding of these terms and their purpose. Any comparisons made today are based on a comparison to the same period in the prior year, unless otherwise stated. Lastly, we will be providing a copy of our prepared remarks on our website at the conclusion of today's call, and a full transcript and audio replay will also be available soon after the call. With that, I'll turn the call over to Patrick.

Thank you, Derrek, and welcome, everyone, to today's call. We appreciate you joining us. During the second quarter, we experienced a slower pace of demand attributable to lower volumes within the businesses of our clients. Total revenue was down 4% versus prior year, which was down from flat growth in Q1. While the revenue environment was challenging, I'm pleased that we were able to effectively manage costs resulting in net income and earnings per share growth as well as adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. We generated adjusted earnings per share of $0.64 up 12% from the prior period and expanded adjusted EBITDA margins by 30 basis points. We also continue to make progress on our digital initiatives designed to drive long-term growth. Consistent with our goal of returning capital to shareholders to enhance returns, we repurchased another $4 million worth of shares and still have $49 million remaining under our current buyback authorization. Now I'd like to take a few minutes to update you on the financial results and strategic initiatives within each of our segments starting with our largest segment PeopleReady. PeopleReady is the leading provider of on-demand labor and skilled trades in the North American industrial staffing market and represents 62% of trailing 12-month total company revenue and 58% of segment profit. PeopleReady's revenue was down 2% during the quarter due to lower same-client demand as many reported lower volumes within their own businesses. It's important to note that we don't sense any reluctance on the part of our clients to use our services rather our clients themselves tell us that their own businesses have slowed. Consistent with our focus on effectively managing costs across the business, we have trimmed some operational cost within PeopleReady. But at the same time, we are also making strategic investments for growth. As…

Thank you, Patrick. Total revenue of $589 million was below our $606 million to $623 million outlook. Revenue was down 4% for the quarter, which was a decrease from flat growth in Q1 2019, primarily due to less same-customer revenue, attributable to lower volumes within our customers' businesses. The most prominent change in the revenue trend occurred within the PeopleReady business, which experienced a 2% decline in Q2 versus growth of 3% in Q1. Revenue was up 3% during the first two-week period of Q2, and after normalizing for the timing shift of Easter week three of the quarter was flat. Revenue did not rebound in the fourth week and remained in decline throughout the quarter, culminating in a June exit rate to the quarter of negative 3%. The slowing pace of demand in our consolidated results was most evident within industries associated with physical goods. For example, compared to the year-over-year trend in Q1, the year-over-year trend in Q2, decelerated by 10 percentage points in manufacturing by 6 percentage points in retail, and by 4 percentage points in transportation. Net income per diluted share of $0.49 exceeded the high end of our $0.39 to $0.46 outlook, and adjusted net income per diluted share of $0.64 exceeded the high end of our $0.55 to $0.62 outlook. EPS and adjusted EPS were up 11% and 12% respectively, on top of strong EPS and adjusted EPS growth in Q2 last year of 42% and 36% respectively. Our performance was driven by a variety of actions to scale our costs to the level of demand, as well as reductions to incentive program costs given the current revenue trends. The effective income tax rate for the quarter of 11% was below our 14% expected rate, due to additional Work Opportunity Tax Credits. Gross margin…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from John Healy with Northcoast Research. Your line is open.

Thank you. Guys, I wanted to just talk about the big picture theme. I appreciate your comments about the sector and kind of the broader changes in activity your customers are presenting to you. From your perspective, what is the decision-making process? I mean, how long do you look at the activity in your customers and say, okay, something meaningful has changed here, we need to react in our business. Can you help us understand just kind of how you assess the vitals of your customers? And then ultimately, how you assess the vitals in your business? And how long do you want to see some softness, before you would take broader cost actions in the business?

Yes. Thanks for the question John. This is Patrick. Just a couple of comments first. One of the things that Derrek mentioned is that the -- in his prepared remarks, the softness was fairly widespread. If you look at just from the June exit rate into what we're seeing in July, it's pretty widespread. Our eight largest states are all softer. Our verticals are a little bit mixed. Manufacturing, retail, transportation are all down, construction has gotten a little softer, hospitality is doing pretty well for us. And as you know our business particularly in PeopleReady tilts more heavy into projects than most staffing providers. And what we're hearing from our clients anecdotally is that projects are being pushed out a bit, particularly in construction and solar. We're also hearing from our clients about some inventory buildups, particularly in auto and consumer packaged goods and these buildups lead to some softness in labor demand and we saw them in Q2 and we’re seeing that in July. In terms of when do we take cost actions? We sort of look at it two ways John. The first is where should we make more investments and where should we make cuts? And so what we were doing is we were watching very closely in Q2, the revenue trends in the business and we decided to make some investments in sales and marketing. So we've -- as I've mentioned in my prepared remarks, we stood up a team, a team that's focused on client experience and making sure we have a good onboarding experience for our clients and then assessing our existing client satisfaction levels and putting them on a marketing journey. If they're a satisfied client, it's a sales and marketing journey that's focused on expansion. If there a client that's having some challenges, we're in rapid recovery mode. So we're making some investments to help drive additional revenue given the softness that we're seeing. And then from a cost cutting perspective, right now we're pretty hesitant to make any cuts in the area of sales and marketing. But we have made some cuts in other areas of the business, particularly stuff that's not client facing or candidate facing. And so we made some of those actions in Q2, so we've already started some of that process to make sure that we've got a cost structure that aligns with the revenue stream that we have.

Hey, John, this is Derrek. I'm just going to jump in and have just a little additional color on the question related to cost cuts. At this point in time we don't think we need to do more than we're doing right now and what I mean by that is that the SG&A decline that we delivered this quarter was at the same pace of the revenue decline and our outlook for Q3 has a similar trend built into it to match the revenue trend. Doing something broader or bigger at this point in time we think would be pretty immature. This cycle, this very long cycle that we have been in has had starts and it has had slow points and this could very well be a slow point. So we want to keep that part in mind. But our intention is to continue to manage the level of the costs in the business to scale it to where our revenue is. If this were to develop into something bigger and a longer slowdown, we would -- on those cost actions, we would take more. And likely if the revenue decline continued to decelerate, pick up more steam then the cost would -- the percentages decrease in the cost would trail that revenue as it would in other periods. But that's how we're looking at it right now. So we're going to stay disciplined on this, manage quarter-to-quarter, not jump too far ahead and overreact but make sure we're taking the right actions based on what we're seeing at any given point in time.

Understood. And I think Patrick you mentioned that there was I want to say $49 million of new business wins or new account wins on the solutions side. How should we think about that business? And how maybe some of the incremental revenues that you guys are bringing on board how -- from a timing perspective, how that might be coming together? And then ultimately with that business, kind of the incremental margin we should expect on those revenues kind of as they ramp up?

Yes. I appreciate the question. We've made a lot of progress in the PeopleManagement business from a sales execution perspective. We brought in some new leadership last year to help support the sales efforts in PeopleManagement. And as you know, the sales cycles are fairly long in that business and so we're just starting to see the fruits of some of those changes that we made last year. As you rightly pointed out, we're running at a pretty good clip relative to what we had done in the prior year in terms of new wins. One of the things that we've seen though that's been a little bit of a challenge in terms of ramping is a number of those wins client have come to us and said, gosh, we don't want to do a big bang and bring in 200, 300, 400 people all at once. And so what normally would take a couple of months to see a ramp up, it's now taking closer to six or seven months for a full ramp. So I'll give you an example just to bring it to life. We recently sold a deal at an industrial laundry facility and they had a need for 250 people and we were taking the scope away from a couple of incumbents. And the client had said to us, gosh we don't want to have a huge impact on productivity. We've got a lot of folks that have been here a long time and the contracts that they had with those incumbents didn't allow for a transfer of the workforce. -- :

Hey, John, just to add a little bit more color on to the incremental and the pace of how that revenue will come on that $48 million of new wins that Patrick talked about that breaks down to about $12 million a quarter. In our outlook for the third quarter, we've got about half of that built in so call it $6 million. So there's room for approximately another $6 million of step-up in run rate from those new wins. And we do expect the incremental on that to be in the neighborhood of 7% maybe a little south of that during the first quarter of an implementation if it's sizable. But as Patrick mentioned, many of these are slower transitions that are coming on and they're not necessarily first-generation accounts. So the implementation timing will -- well the cost and the timing will be small and short.

Great. Thank you, guys.

Your next question comes from Henry Chien with BMO. Your line is open.

Hey, Patrick, hey, Derrek. One of the things that you mentioned was you think there's a sort of fundamental change. I was wondering if you could expand on what you mean by that at least in the hard and just physical goods industries I mean.

Yes. Well we're not incumbents here, but we can just kind of comment on what we're seeing from clients. So in our PeopleManagement business which is heavily focused on manufacturing as well as logistics and more focused on Fortune 500 companies, we saw a clear step-down in the pace of the demand for our services with those clients compared to where they had been running at before. And with those -- with that business because it's more concentrated with customers, we can spend more time understanding what's going on there and the most common reply back from those businesses was that volumes in their own businesses were down. When we keel over to the PeopleReady business, this -- and I talked about it in my prepared comments, we started off the quarter at 3% growth and we ended the quarter at minus 3% and we didn't implement anything new, we didn't make any leadership changes, I mean we just didn't have any changes going on in the method of how we were delivering our services. And as we went into the third quarter, we also saw a bit of a step-down as well. So, just from our experience when we see those types of step-downs, particularly, in PeopleReady which -- because of the project-based nature of the work and the short duration of the jobs and the job assignments, we tend to -- in our opinion, that's one of the businesses in human capital that will -- most on the margin for buyer preferences and changes in their preferences, one that will see changes in demand patterns first.

Got it. Okay, that makes sense. Yes, that's quite a big step change inter-quarter. And then on PeopleScout just what's -- I mean beyond the lost client, what's going on there in terms of some of the weakness or I should say some of the declines in growth there?

Yes, great question Henry. We're definitely seeing some softness similar to what we're seeing in some of the temporary staffing businesses where volumes at our existing clients are down. It's fairly widespread across a number of different industries, different skill categories. It's not an issue where we can't fill the positions. It's a situation where the order volumes are just coming in lighter than what we had seen. And as I mentioned on previous calls, we did have those two headwinds that we've got. One is where we were on the wrong side of an acquisition that we'd previously disclosed. And then we had another client where we had renegotiated the arrangement into a longer term arrangement and gave some price concessions there which had an impact on our revenue. That particular client has also seen some pretty significant volume declines as well. So, it's not a situation where we've got a number of lost clients other than the one we've disclosed, it's more of a volume at our existing client base that's been the biggest headwind.

Yes. Thanks guys.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Mark Marcon with Baird. Your line is open.

Good afternoon, Patrick and Derrek. Did you -- for PeopleReady, were you down 5% in July or is that the way it's trending?

We're running about 6% down in July, Mark.

Okay. And then can you give us -- you gave the monthly color for PeopleReady intra-quarter and then into non-July, can you talk about that on PeopleScout as well as PeopleManagement?

Well, let me give you the consolidated trends. PeopleScout -- let me give you the consolidated trends first. So, July was down minus 4%. Remember that we had Easter that was down in the third week 9%. If you normalize it, it would've been flat really without the Easter holiday and then following week was down 7% that's what contributed to that.

I think you meant April not July.

Excuse me, at April. Yeah. Thanks, Patrick. And then May was down 3% and June was down 5%. The PeopleManagement trend was really very consistent month-to-month really very close to the 14% for the quarter and PeopleScout was down 12% in April, up 4% in May, and up 9% in June. I would – just wouldn't read too much in the RPO trend they're lumpy by nature. Sometimes some job orders come in or they don't get filled they get pushed to the next month and it's a small population. So I wouldn't read too much into the monthly RPO trends.

Okay. And can you talk a little bit about the pay/bill trends that you're seeing? And specifically, how we should think about the bill rate increases relative to volume?

Yeah. Bill rates for us in Q2 were up 2% and pay rates were up 1%. Some of that is some noise that we have going on in our – and some of these headwinds that we've talked about that create some mix issues. But if we go to where the biggest driver is it's in our PeopleReady basin which is the purest of all of those bill rates were up about 3% and pay rates were up about 1.5%.

Do you think you're being impacted by rising minimum wage rates and potentially lessening demand on some of the folks that you would typically end up placing within PeopleReady, or is that an issue at all?

Well, it could – there's a possibility that it could be something on a larger period besides the quarter. But as we went into Q2 there weren't any minimum wage increases that went into play. So, the trends that we saw in Q2 when it pertains to PeopleReady there just wasn't anything new there to drive fundamental change from a minimum wage perspective.

Got it. And with regards – you mentioned construction was also softer. Did it actually decline year-over-year, or was it just a lessening in the trend?

Well, there's two parts to the story with construction, because while construction has not been a big grower for us over the last three quarters, it has been very stable. And so what I'm talking about here is it being flat to maybe up 2% depending on which quarter you picked whether it was Q4 last year or Q1 this year or Q2 this year. Now, when we -- the deceleration in the PeopleReady trend that we saw going into July that was primarily in the PeopleReady business. So what we -- what usually happens in our PeopleReady business is, if we take the last couple of weeks of June. And then we look to the second and third week of July, I'm holding off on the first week, because the holiday is in there the July 4th. But you take a look at the second and third week of July. And our business our weekly revenue trends should be stepping up. And when I say trends, I'm talking about the dollar amount of revenue that we're doing. Because, as we get into the warmer months, the construction part of our business becomes a greater peace of the mix. In the construction business, we were seeing lighter step-ups as we went into July. So, the difference between that, minus 3% exit rate that we had coming out of June for the quarter. And the trends that I mentioned at minus 6% for PeopleReady during the -- during July that is kind of the main thing is we're seeing the softness primarily coming in the area of construction.

Great, I really appreciate the granular color. I will follow-up a little bit more offline.

[Operator Instructions] At this time, we're still waiting for callers to join the queue. Mr. Beharelle, would you like me to hold the line open for another moment?

I think just another moment.

We have no further questions at this time.

Well, thank you. And I appreciate you all listening in on our second quarter earnings call. The team is working real hard to try to change these trends. And we look forward to reporting in three months. Thank you everybody.

Thank you for joining. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.