Good morning. My name is Suvi and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to TransAlta Corporation's Third Quarter 2022 Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Ms. Tomte, you may begin the conference.

Thank you, Suvi. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to TransAlta's third quarter 2022 conference call. With me today are John Kousinioris, President and Chief Executive Officer; Todd Stack, EVP Finance and Chief Financial Officer; and Kerry O'Reilly Wilks, EVP, Legal, Commercial, and External Affairs. Today's call is being webcast and I invite those listening on the phone lines to view the supporting slides that we have posted on our website. A replay of the call will be available later today and the transcript will be posted to our site shortly thereafter. All of the information provided during this conference call is subject to the forward-looking statement qualification set out here on Slide 2, detailed further in our MD&A and incorporated in full for the purpose of today's call. All amounts are referenced during the call are in Canadian currency, unless otherwise noted. The non-IFRS terminology used, including adjusted EBITDA, funds from operations and free cash flow are reconciled in the MD&A for your reference. On today's call, John and Todd will provide an overview of the quarters result. After these remarks, we will open the call for questions. With that, let me turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Holly. Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining our third quarter results call for 2022. As part of our commitment towards reconciliation, I want to begin by acknowledging the TransAlta's Head Office, where we are today is located in the traditional territories of the Niitsitapi; the People of the Treaty 7 region in Southern Alberta, which includes the Siksika, the Piikani, the Kainai, the Tsuut’ina, and the Stoney-Nakoda First Nations; as well as home to the Métis Nation, Region 3. TransAlta had an exceptional third quarter. I'm extremely pleased with the performance of our company. We delivered $555 million of adjusted EBITDA, a 38% increase over the prior period, with performance significantly above expectations from our Alberta Electricity portfolio. The results demonstrate the value of our strategically diversified fleet in Alberta. Our performance was driven by our ability to optimize our fleet, adjust our portfolio position to respond to changing market conditions, and deliver operational performance which enabled us to capture the higher prices experienced in Alberta. As a result, our financial results were ahead of expectations for the quarter, we generated free cash flow of $393 million, or $1.45 per share, an 87% increase quarter-over-quarter. On a year-to-date basis, we have generated $1.1 billion in adjusted EBITDA, a 5% increase over 2021 results and free cash flow per share of $2.38, a 28% increase year-over-year. With this performance across the fleet and our continuing positive outlook on market expectations for the balance of the year, we've revised our 2022 financial guidance upwards, increasing our adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow guidance by $295 million and $245 million respectively at the midpoints compared to our original guidance for 2022. We also announced that our Board of Directors approved a common share dividend increase of 10% representing our…

Thank you, John and good morning everyone. In Alberta, our hydro, gas and wind facilities are dispatched as a portfolio in order to benefit from baseload and peaking energy sales. And in the third quarter, the fleet generated just under 2,900 gigawatt hours of electricity. Over the past two years, we've positioned our fleet to firm renewables and provide capacity and energy when needed by the grid. During the quarter, the Province experienced high electricity demand driven by record setting heat, particularly in August and early September. During the same period, planned and unplanned outages at several generators, as well as outages on the transmission timelines, reduced overall supply capacity. These factors contributed to strong pricing throughout the quarter, with the average pool price for Q3 settling at $221 per megawatt hour, compared to $100 per megawatt hour in Q3 of 2021. Pool prices were also impacted by higher natural gas prices as compared to last year. Our fleet operated exceptionally well in the quarter and supplied increased electricity when it was needed most. Our strong financial performance in Q3 was underpinned by high availability at our hydro and gas facilities, which tracked just under 98%. Production from our gas fleet was approximately 84% hedged at $80 per megawatt hour, and the remaining merchant production realized a price of $264 per megawatt hour. Combined, the Alberta gas lead generated $290 million of revenue, which equated to a blended realized price of $146. The ability of our hydro fleet to capture peak pricing was once again demonstrated in the quarter with realized merchant prices of $246 per megawatt hour, which represented an 11% premium over the average spot price. Realized price for ancillary services also increased over 2021 from $46 per megawatt hour in Q3 of last year to $128 per…

Thanks, Todd. As I look at our strategic priorities for 2022, our goal is to continue delivering clean electricity solutions to our customers and to be the supplier of choice for customers that are focused on sustainable growth and decarbonization. In 2022, we're focused on progressing the following key goals, reaching final investment decisions on the equivalent of 400 megawatts of clean electricity projects in Canada, the United States, and Australia. We're on track to securing another 200 megawatts in addition to the 200 megawatts already announced so far this year with over 300 megawatts of advanced stage projects in development. Achieving COD on the garden plain wind and northern goldfields solar projects, progressing construction on our U.S. wind projects at White Rock and Horizon Hill, and advancing our Mount Keith transmission expansion project in Western Australia. Expanding our development pipeline with a focus on renewables and storage, progressing the rehabilitation of Kent Hills wind, achieving EBITDA and free cash flow within our revised guidance ranges, and advancing our ESG objectives, which includes reclamation work at High Vale and Centralia, the provision of indigenous cultural awareness training to all our employees, and achieving at least 40% female employees by 2030. I'd like to close by highlighting what I think makes TransAlta attractive investment and a great value opportunity. First, our cash flows are resilient and are supported by a high quality and highly diversified portfolio, as evidenced by our exceptional results in the quarter. Our businesses driven by our unique reliable and perpetual hydro portfolio, our clean wind and solar portfolio, and our efficient gas portfolio, all of which are complemented by our world class asset optimization and energy marketing capabilities. Second, we're a clean electricity leader with a focus on tangible greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Earlier this year, we…

Thank you, John. [Operator Instructions]. And your first question will be from Rob Hope at Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. First questions just on allocation of capital. We've seen a significant step up in cash flow this year. How are you thinking about allocating it? We've seen a little bit on the buybacks, some dividend increase? Could we see the rest to pay down debt further accelerate their growth profile? Or could we see incremental returns to shareholders through a larger buyback?

Yes, good morning, Rob. Great question. We allocate the way we look at sort of the allocation of capital in the company on a D consolidated basis. You're right, we are seeing a higher cash flow over the course of the year. We've have increased our dividend, we do have a significant growth profile that's ongoing. It's almost a billion and a half dollars of construction, which is ongoing. And as I mentioned in the call, we continue to look opportunistically to increase the share buybacks. That's something that I expect will continue to do, certainly into this quarter. And again, you would expect that to be a reasonably substantial sum that we would be looking to do in terms of share buybacks. Todd I don't know if you want to add anything to that?

Look, I would just add that Rob, the dividends really focused on what I would say more fundamental long-term projections of the stability of the company, not really just the one-time or the one quarter's results. So that's really just about the future sustainability with the company. John said, we have a lot of room left on our NCIB program. And so I think, certainly at the prices that we've seen over the last couple of months here that we think it's an attractive purchase.

And Robert, I'd say we're pretty comfortable with where our debt levels are. I mean, I think the credit facility we put in place and kind of our focus on refinancing the bond, we're pretty happy there.

All right. Appreciate the color there. And then maybe taking a look at 2023. Just looking at where the forward curve is, we've seen you. We've seen you had some additional hedges out for that year, when you take a look at pricing and the dynamics in 2023. Do you have a bias upwards or downwards in terms of the Alberta power market? And I guess, secondly, are you worried about any political interference in the market?

In terms of 2023, I'd say, right now, our view is that it looks to be a constructive year, I think the forward curve, the average price for the year is kind of in that $119 range, and Q1 looks strong, I think the average price is nudging up towards $200 in that period with January and February being particularly strong, and Q3 also looks good. So we expect another good year, I would say in 2023. So we're optimistic that that the company will continue to perform in a in a strong manner going forward. In terms of political, intervention or interference, we tend to think of things in terms of, I think you have to take a long-term view of where pricing is in the marketplace, rather than kind of looking at some of the strength that we've seen in pricing over the course of the last three or four months. It's been a circumstance driven by heat by gas pricing by some of the constraints, you know, some of the outages, we've had inter ties. So the company has performed well, but I think you have to take a long-term view on where power prices are from an entry from a government perspective, and that's our message to the government, I think the energy only market works and has worked over the course of the year. And when we look at the cost of delivered power to consumers, it's as much the cost of transmission and distribution is as it is the electrons. The other thing I would say is it is open for certainly commercial and industrial customers and even consumers at home to enter into contracts where they can kind of fix their costs for power at levels that are significantly below I would say where some of the wholesale prices have cleared over the course of the last few months. And you know, so that's a lever that they can pull and that's something that we've been encouraging folks to at least think about.

That's it for me. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks Rob.

Thanks, Ron. Next question will be from Mark Darby at CIBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks, John, when you look at the growth pipeline, you know, we show 59% of your target EBIT. In hand here, you've got Tempest and a few other projects, which could get you closer to 80%. When you think about getting to your target in 2025, is the expectation that the internal development pipeline will get you there? Or do you think M&A is something that you'll lean on to get you to that 2025 targets?

Good morning, Mark. I'd say really two answers to that question, I think we're pretty confident that it's our internal development pipeline that's going to get us there, the M&A side would be helpful. I mean, candidly, I'm encouraging the team from an M&A perspective to be more focused on transactions that would supplement our growth pipeline rather than bringing in assets to be able to achieve the result. The other thing I would say is, look, we're reevaluating our targets. As we go forward, we're very comfortable with our 2 gigawatt target. What we are seeing is, the cost of construction is increasing a bit. So that 3 billion target as a practical matter, may be drifting upwards a bit, but we are seeing returns stay in with the expectation levels that we have. So you might see the EBITDA number also in a commensurate way, kind of kind of adjust going upwards. So that's, that's something that we're working to provide clarity. And that's something I think, Todd that when we come up with their guidance, we'll do a little bit of a refresh in terms of the way we see numbers going forward.

And then just to follow-up on that comment, you talked about higher EBITDA on the PTC sharing some of that with the suppliers. It does look like the EVD EBITDA multiples on the build costs have come down a little bit, but obviously, it's a bit long moving parts here with tax equity, whatnot. So net-net, are the returns on those projects, increasing, or as you said, they just holding flat and you're passing through the higher costs?

Yes, Mark, I'd say they're largely holding flat at the end of the day, really just the 100 100% PTC treatment did get a bit of a pickup for the projects. But we did commit to share some of that upside potential upside with the turbine supplier, as we mentioned.

Okay. And then just last question for me, it just around, we're getting closer to some at some outcome on the review of Tier and a CS just updated views and impact on the markets where you guys operate?

Yes, I mean, the -- we're waiting, and I think we'll be hearing shortly, actually, in terms of where the tier outcome is that I know that the provincial governments been working hard to land that and is in a dialogue with the feds to be able to land that. I don't think we're expecting to see any surprises, I think we're seeing the carbon price trajectory to continue to increase, certainly in 2023 into that mid $60 range. There is a discussion about the performance standard and how it -- excuse me how it might decline over time. I -- these are all things that that our expectation is that they will land broadly in the middle of a fairway in terms of what our forecasting would see. We're not expecting any surprises on those.

Yes, and I just like to say like, we've over the last couple of years tried to what I would say is somewhat immunize or soften the impacts of any tier, any changes to tier or the environmental criteria. One of the upsides that that I think we're kind of encouraged by or potentially may come out of some of the values of our renewable energy credit portfolio. And what do you think underrated? Let's generate off the wind and hydro fleets, which may have actually more value than what we were previously thinking. So we're waiting eagerly.

Can you just expand on that last comment Todd in terms of see more value from the credits?

Yes, just the ability, the potential ability to use more renewable energy credits to offset carbon liabilities from carbon emitting facilities. And so if there's a larger demand for those credits than we see upside and value.

I think there's the notion that the amount of credits that could be procured to basically offset the carbon price might be enhanced or lifted a bit to create more of a balance in the demand and supply of those attributes in the marketplace, which I think gives us uniquely an opportunity to monetize some of our inventory, so to speak over the course of the coming years, I would say Mark.

Okay. Thanks, John. Thanks.

Thank you. Next question will be from Dariusz Lozny at the Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. Just maybe a little bit more high level. I was wondering if you could comment on thoughts on the carbon capture and storage opportunity in Alberta? Obviously, nothing in your pipeline at present. But just curious where you are taking about that long-term?

Yes, I -- look, I think in order for the province to get to a place where you know, our governments are targeting it to get to a place in terms of the decarbonization of the grid. I think we're going to need all of the above solution, which I think we're going to need all of the above solution, which I think is going to include CCS, so that's something I think that's developing from a government policy perspective, we think it makes sense that they would be focusing energies around that, our major discussion point with the governments to make sure that they take balance and kind of a technology agnostic approach to the various kinds of -- or various types of generation that could facilitate the evolution of the marketplace, from storage to even hydro, frankly, wind or combinations of those things. And I think they're listening to that. And we've seen that with the Fall economic statement that came out and had been encouraged by what seems to be an all of the above approach in terms of incentivizing development going forward. So, the one thing with CCS that we continue to kind of assess, it's just the cost associated with it, and just the technological certainty around it. So I know folks are working on those things. And hopefully it results in something that can be realized, I think it'll help us with our glide path.

Great, thank you for that. One more, if I can. This one is on RNW that you guys had a couple of nice milestones in the quarter, you got Sarnia re-contracted, I was wondering if you could maybe just touch upon, what are the next milestones that you see whether that be re-contracting or otherwise, and appreciate the update on Kent Hills, I was wondering if you could expand on that just a little bit. And if you have one provide an update as to when you might actually start to turn some of those repaired turbines back on?

Yes, maybe I'll start on that, Darius. Clearly, the highest priority of TransAlta Renewables is getting those Kent Hills facilities turbines back up and running, happy with the progress so far of disassembling the next big milestone, we'll see as they start putting turbines back together and reconnecting them to the grid with new foundations. So that's priority number one. I don't think that we'll see. Although we've been having some discussions, but the intent is to disassemble and report all of the foundations, and then bring in the reassembly and recommissioning. I don't think you'll see that until close to mid-year, next year of when the first turbine start to come back online. Although I would say the team is actively looking at is there a way to kind of change the rehabilitation process to actually accelerate the timeframes in which some come on, even though it might mean kind of delaying the rehabilitation of some of the turbines into the balance of the year. So we're continuing to work on optimizing that, I would say Todd.

I think optimizing is the key word like we have been focused on cost for the whole project. But if we can bring some of the turbines back on earlier that may, if we need to rejig the schedule, that may be the most efficient thing to do.

And then I think also for RNW in terms of growth, I think some of the Australian projects that we're working on with BHP would be another avenue that that we're looking at for them. And that's something the team is working on, both in Calgary and in Perth to get across the goal line.

Okay, great. Thank you guys very much. I'll turn it back here.

Thanks so much.

Our next question will be from Maurice Choy, RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks and good morning. Maybe just sticking with the RNW theme here. John, you mentioned in the last call that you'd be looking to provide clarity on status of these two entities. Maybe just an update on how you view this, the two working together to in terms of growth, or when should we expect that clarity moving forward?

Yes, no, Maurice. Good morning. We are actively working on that, I had good sessions with the boards of both companies in terms of trying to provide just a greater sense of clarity going forward between the two. And it's our expectation that we'll do so at the time that we provide guidance for both companies, which we're trying to actually accelerate with a view to potentially doing that in kind of a December timeframe, I would say Todd, which is something that we're focused on doing, Maurice. So certainly, before the end of the year, we would look to provide just clarity in terms of the positioning of the two companies going forward so that investors both have a better line of sight to how the future may look.

That's great. And we look forward to that. Maybe just a quick follow-up to that. Will that update also provide visibility of the drop downs from RNW like what assets will go?

Yes, I think it will. There are a number of what we're calling ROFR projects within TransAlta Renewables expansions and projects down in Australia, the [indiscernible] RNW and we'll look to provide clarity on that.

I think the answer is yes.

My second question is about Slide 12, which is the strong performance that you have in Hydro. And particularly I want to talk about the realized reservice pricing that you have, you've got 58% average over the last seven quarters. And if my calculations right this quarter in Q3, you have had strong just under 60% realized pricing, sharp contrast to Q2, which is sub 40%. Can you speak to some of the dynamics in the quarter that saw you had this favorable capture pricing that you didn't see in Q2? And your thoughts on whether or not these dynamics will continue?

Yes, so, Maurice, I think when we look at kind of what has happened over the course of the year, I'd say I'm not surprised by how we've seen the AS proceed in terms of the average price that's been realized kind of in that call it 50% to 60% range, I think in times where like we experienced in Q3, you had high levels of volatility, we would expect there to be a greater percentage, I would say, Todd a higher lift in terms of the difference between the energy price and the AS price and at times when there is less volatility, even though the average price might be reasonably high, you'd expect it to be, think of a sliding scale more on the left side of the scale, as opposed to the higher right side of the scale. I think the relationship holds. And it's primarily I think driven from a volatility perspective, when the market is tight, I think AS is super valuable. And we'll see it swing that way, Todd, if you have any color on that, but at least that's the way I think.

No, it is all predicated on actual volatility, $120 prices can be derived in a couple of ways. It could be prices between $100 and $140 average out to $120. Or it could be prices between $50 and $250, that's right. And in that latter case, that's when you really get to pick off the volatility in the higher prices. And you see it in the ancillary services market, as well as in the energy market for hydro.

And you saw it in terms of the demand in the quarter, I would say, Maurice is well aware, we had just about I think it was 800 gigawatt hours of AS that was basically delivered by the company, whereas our I think a more typical run rate would have been about 550 gigawatt hours. Less than that, typically, I think over time, more than that 750 range, I think, Todd, you even mentioned that in your notes.

Right and maybe just one more thing is that we've seen it pan out over the course of the summer, and even here into Q4, where the renewables are having a massive impact on that volatility, where if it's sunny and windy prices are trading in that $60 to $80 range. And as soon as we start to see the Sun disappear, or the wind drop off, prices jump up to $50, $60 minimum in that period, and so that that volatility around the renewables is just going to be getting, get bigger over time.

So I'd say it's directionally positive for the need for AS and the value of the hydro fleet, Maurice.

It sounds like the 52% average was seven quarters, that's probably something that it's quite sustainable moving forward. Although I appreciate.

Yes, that would be our view.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Next question will be from Andrew Kuske at Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, maybe a kind of narrow question, but a broad question at the same time, could you maybe give a refresh on just the terms of the Brookfield deal as it relates to the percentage of ownership on the Hydro plants just in I asked, just in part, given the hydro performance that you put up this quarter? And I think at the time of the transaction, there was a cap at 49%. But you were predicating everything really on a 30% to 33% ownership stake?

Yes, so good morning, Andrew, happy to do that. And now I've got to go back into the depths of my memory for all of that, but effectively the way the transaction works is our Hydro fleet is valued on the basis of 13 times EBITDA with a fixed amount of sustaining capital deducted from that, which if memory serves is $15 million a year in terms of the set price that we've done, and we do a three year average to figure out what they would get. So $750 million investment is, 700 -- what percentage of $750 million of that 13 times that three year average EBITDA of the of the Hydro performance over time, and then they do have essentially two top up rates. One is a 10% top up rate provided to TransAlta's at the time is over $14 a share. And they do have the ability to increase that ownership stake up to 49% of TransAlta is trading over $17 a share at that time. I think there's also the ability to be able to go up to 25% in the event that their ownership stake is significantly below that they want it to be able to have a meaningful ownership stake if it fell to a relatively de minimis level. So I think that's in a nutshell, I think all of the levers that that kind of surround the transaction. Yes, does that help? Sorry, go ahead, Todd.

Andrew, you mentioned that 30% level that was really predicated on EBITDA from a Hydro facility potentially being in that $200 million to $250 million or $225 million to $250 million range. This year, this year is a year that sort of goes towards that three year average, and will be pushing $500 million of EBITDA this year. So that percentage ratio will change accordingly, should they choose to exercise their option.

Okay, appreciate that color. That was a lot of information out of the resources of your brain. If I could maybe ask a follow-up question just on the government economic update that came out last week. And if you had a hypothetical facility with the same returns on both sides of the border, the Canada, U.S border. What legislative framework do you think you would allocate capital into would it really be IRA or is there enough sort of meat on the bone in Canada now to track capital?

Yes, look I think the economic update that the Federal government did was really constructive. And I do think it was directed at basically levelizing the playing field. So what really drives us right now is really the opportunity set, I would say, I would say the drag, let's say on a Canadian investment has largely been kind of taken away. The other thing I would say is that and folks sometimes forget this, we tend to view the policy environment in both countries, countries now as being something that is oriented at increasing demand more than actually, at the end of the day helping our returns. And I'll explain what I mean by that. A lot of people just kind of think, the ITC has come in, that's a game that the company gets, I think sophisticated buyers understand what that means for the returns of the developer, and then they recalibrate the PPA prices to assess what that, what an appropriate level of return given the risk that's being taken. So I think people shouldn't be thinking of it in terms of a windfall, that people will be getting, I think it's more oriented to ensuring that there's a continuing drive and appetite to bring the renewables auto or whatever program they're developing, if that makes sense.

Okay, very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question will be from John Mould of TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, everyone. Maybe just going back to your priority slide and the reference to securing long-term contracts for the Alberta Merchant fleet. Can you just clarify, is that more reference to the mid-term customer contracts that form part of your hedging number? Or no more kind of one-off merchant PPAs like what you did with Exshaw or some mix in between?

It's actually both. John, good morning. I'm glad you raised that, it is actually both we do. As you know, the market in Alberta, the Ford market in Alberta has limited liquidity. So when we think of our C&I business, and we think of our total hedging levels, a pretty big component of that is based on our C&I business, especially the fixed price component rather than the flow component of the C&I business, which tends to be Todd, probably two to three years would be kind of the average tenure of those. In tandem with that, as you know, we've got quite a bit of merchant wind, for example, in Alberta, and even at times we have discussions with people on Hydro, if there would be something that we would be willing to do to help shape on Hydro that would provide kind of medium term or even longer term contracts like you saw with Lafarge that we would have done earlier than the year. So it's really both, we do see a critical component of our hedging program in Alberta as requiring what I would call outside of financial market hedging. So it is both and the team has targets around both, we drive them from a goal perspective in terms of what they're trying to do.

Okay, maybe just follow up on that quickly because you mentioned Hydro, is some sort of off take for hydro really achievable, just given the benefit that you get in in quarters like the past one where between AS and energy, I guess maybe AS you would still accrue. But there's exceptional benefits for TransAlta that PPA price would have to be pretty high for that deal to get done. Is that a fair way to think about it?

I think it is, I think people kind of gravitate the, AS often gravitates to the hydro and you know the response is typically, you have to understand that is a premium product, given the relative scarcity and the role that it plays here in in the Province. So, a good, good way to think of it is exactly the way you've articulated. And it's part of the portfolio that we try to keep open, frankly, for exactly the reason that we saw in the last quarter.

Okay, great. And then maybe just pivoting to Ontario, the ISO is going to procure four gigawatts of capacity, including up to 1.5 gigawatts of gas. You qualified for the first long-term RFP, not the expedited round, I believe, but what investments are you considering? Are you looking at batteries? Would you look at any investments in gas beyond batteries, such as enhancements of upgrades or maybe even new units is given that 1.5 gigawatt slice or you really not looking at new capital in meaningful, I should say new capital and gas at this point?

Yes, it's a real active discussion right now, I would say, in the company, John, and look, what we've said is we're, our growth is primarily focused on renewables. But when we see a gas opportunity for an existing client, including the ISO was an existing client, in the province of Ontario, it's something that we would consider. So although it's early days, we are turning our minds to what some kind of participation might consist of, particularly when we look at the footprint that we have kind of in that Sarnia Windsor area. So nothing definitive yet, but we're definitely looking at it, I would say.

Okay, I'll leave it there. Thank you very much.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. And your next question will be from Naji Baydoun at IA Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Just wanted to go back to the topic of capital costs and returns, you mentioned that the returns are relatively fast, given the different moving pieces. I'm just wondering if you can give us a refresh of where you see IRR is in a different markets. And maybe that will kind of help inform where you'd lean to invest a bit more and one jurisdiction more than another?

Yes, Naji happy to do that. We look, we continually look at what our hurdle rates are. And we tend to focus on IRR as being one of the key factors that we look at. And frankly, we've really focus on contracted period, IRRs, I think what we're seeing is in terms of the opportunity sets that we're pursuing, notwithstanding some of the -- I would say near term inflationary headwinds that we're seeing in the marketplace, as the returns are kind of hanging in. And I think, when we think of that, I think Todd, it would be sort of upper single-digit returns that we can get to a double-digit return. And I'm just talking about that base transaction without us adding any of the benefits that we can by optimizing it, whether it's everything from an operational perspective to the way that we're financing it, to whatever we do continues to be, broadly speaking, I think what we're looking at. I don't know if that answers your question, Todd, if you have any perspectives, and I think we're seeing it very similarly, just the last point in each of the three jurisdictions that we operate in, I don't think we see a huge difference between sort of Canada or certainly the return environment, I'd say, Todd, Canada, the U.S. and/or Australia -- it's pretty similar.

They're all very similar in geographies on unraised returns. And as we kind of talked about a little bit before, we see the best returns coming from the Greenfield and on field development sites that we have, we're still active in the M&A market, we do look a lot of transactions. And I would say we haven't actually seen a reduction in prices or multiples being paid for M&A transactions, which seems disconnected from where we've seen the underlying interest rates move and where we've seen inflation move. Now, maybe that's a short-term issue. And we'll start to see a little bit more rational investing on the M&A side, but that's really what's been leading us towards the Greenfield, the Greenfield development side.

And just to kind of close the discussion, I mean, we would -- the way we would look at returns is we do focus on it from a risk adjusted perspective. So a very long tenor PPA from double A rated, off taker would be viewed differently from the company as something that would be shorter and tender, has a larger merchant tail in terms of what you're looking at and has credit worthiness that isn't the same as the other party. The other area that we look at would be just the market dynamics in terms of where the project is and that's, particularly with a view to the merchant period, is it constructive? And one that is based on supply and demand fundamentals? Or is there some distortion in the market that concerns us? So it's a bit of a, of a judgment call that we make with our with our board when we move forward.

Okay, guys that's really helpful. And I guess, maybe take that to the next sort of step. When you think about updating your sort of the outlook for 2023. You talked about maybe refreshing the strategy for NW, but just given where you are on your targets? I mean, it would seem like 250 million of incremental with a very conservative. Is that a number that you think you'd also update shortly?

You mean, for balance of 2022?

No, I…

Yes, the 2 gigawatt growth program that's under targeting 250 million of EBITDA were 55% of the way through that we're at about 200 or about 150 million of the 250. I'm not sure that's going to be part of our guidance in December that will be readdressing that.

No, but Naji sorry, I misunderstood your question. It ideally, I would like to see if we could actually update what we actually think those numbers are going forward. And my current expectation is that 250 number would increase, right? Because the returns are holding yet the cost of capital to build out some of the pipeline is increasing. So we would expect the return rate to be holding, but both of those numbers to kind of lift as time goes by if that makes sense.

Yes, exactly. Because I mean, just based on what you've achieved, that 300 million would seem more like an achievable target. But we'll you know, we'll wait for that update [indiscernible]. Just wanted to ask more questions. Just on the buybacks, you mentioned maybe being a bit more aggressive on the buybacks in the short-term, that even with the increase in the share price today, you bought stock at around $12.5 shares are going to be above that today that change at all, your view on buybacks?

We're always optimistic -- opportunistic on our share buybacks when we see the share price trading below. I mean, last time, it dropped below $13 level after Q2, and we thought that was a good opportunity to purchase. So he looked we'll just play it by year, and we'll look for opportunities to support the shares.

Okay. So I think it below 13 is a no brainer and above that depends on what else is on the table.

I would say based on where it's currently I think based on where the share price is currently trading. I think people can expect us to do more share buybacks. Yes.

Okay. But just a follow-up question on garden plane. Any updates on [indiscernible] decision to exercise that option there? And is that option, if you can just remind us, is it only exercisable at COD or is there sort of a longer timeline associated with that?

No, I think it is basically exercise that COD and as a recall, it's for 30% of their proportion of the wind farm 30 of the 100 of the 130 megawatts.

It's 50 of the 100 that they have the rights to purchase. Yes, which works out to about 40% of the facility.

And no update from them in terms of where they are in that process.

Okay. Got it. Thank you very much. Great quarter.

Thank you.

Thanks.

Next question will be from Patrick Kenny at National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. Hey, guys, just on your Alberta gas portfolio. I know you've layered on a few more near-term hedges through 2023. But I'm just curious, given the volatility experienced in the quarter, if you're starting to have more conversations with the industrial power consumers in the province. And whether or not there's any increase in appetite with respect to entering into long-term fixed pricing contracts. Does that -- you might be able to convert some of your Alberta merchant gas capacity to more of a fixed price long-term contract with some of these larger, high credit worthy counterparties?

Sure. Thanks and good morning, Patrick. Todd you want to?

Well, I was just going to say like the CNI business is actively out there looking for transactions. And John mentioned average terms of two to three years, but we do stretch out into five year terms with a number of counterparties for supply, that really forms part of our hedge portfolio. In addition, we do have a long-term contract that starts in November of next year that was originally intended to go with our sun five projects that we it's 200 megawatts, 220 megawatts that we can apply to the CTG units as well. So I think we have a lot of underlying and always looking to add to that portfolio.

But I would say, Patrick, that the bulk of the discussion that we're seeing, I mean, the interest is primarily around the renewables I would say much more than it is around the existing natural gas portfolio that we have. And I think that difference in discussion is pretty, pretty significant between the two that are much more oriented towards the renewable side than it would be the gas side.

Got it. Okay, that's helpful. Thank you. And then maybe just to follow-up on the Alberta hydro question earlier. And assuming, Brookfield does end up with only a 25% ownership stake in the assets versus, the original expectations of 30% to 35%. Curious if you might lean towards crystallizing that bonus 5% to 10% stake so to speak, either by selling that portion of the capacity on a long-term contract basis, or perhaps just selling that that equity stake to a buyer looking for environmental attributes, but just either way to shore up the balance sheet further and accelerate other contracted renewable opportunities?

Yes, I'd say there's no discussion or contemplation of doing that at this point, Patrick. I think we feel pretty comfortable with kind of our balance sheet strength and the cashflow that's being generated from the business and sort of the way we're facing in our clean electricity growth plan. So right now, I don't think we're looking at doing anything.

And it's very early days. I mean, they have several years yet before the option even just is able to be exercised. So early days.

Okay, that's great. Thanks. I'll leave it there.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question will be from Chris Varcoe at The Calgary Herald. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is a question for John. John, can you give us an update on where the company's examination of carbon capture projects? And the potential for it might fit in with trans ultimate? I believe with last year, you talked about the potential of or examination of it, at least with regards to Sundance spark?

Yes, Chris, good morning. So we made the decision last -- not last summer, but the summer of July of 2021 not to proceed with our Sundance five project at that time. And that was due to a number of reasons everything from sort of the regulatory directions that we saw going into just supply and demand dynamics, increasing costs and some of the technological uncertainty that we were seeing with carbon capture and storage. So we made the decision not to pursue the Sun 5 repowering. And as a consequence, carbon capture and storage isn't sort of a primary focus for the company going forward, or our growth focus is far more on our renewables at this point, and particularly wind which is a strength of ours, but storage and solar factor into that will be opportunistic on natural gas serving customers that we have. But although we watch CCS and look to see how it's developing from a technological perspective, it isn't a core focus for our company at this point in time.

Thank you. Just a separate question is the COP 27 conferences begun this week? I guess I'm curious, what steps do you want to see the Governments of Canada and Alberta take at the Climate Conference and what if anything, will you be watching for as a company to come out about?

Yes, it's interesting. We actually have one of our colleagues will be attending and speaking at the conference early next week. I think it is. Look, we think that, climate change is a real factor that that we all need to deal with. We're looking to see that the Federal government continues to have the kind of commitment that has to have in Canada, it's a carbon reduction and emissions reductions targets and are more looking at kind of how policy is developing domestically, which is why the pronouncements under the Fall economic update were so critical for industry. And then from an Alberta perspective, we're looking at, how the Province is also looking to evolve the generation in the jurisdiction to make sure that the grid is greening as we go through and creating some of the room for the oil and gas development that is the core for province and the standard of living that we have here in Alberta. It's more of something that we're looking at, I think broad long-term directions and how things are evolving. We're looking at for example, cross border credit trading, and whether there's alignments around those kinds of things as we move forward, because that's something that's of value to us. And when we look at other potentially important business lines that we can go to, it's sort of an early, it's sort of a precursor to those kinds of things taking place. But our but our real focus is on domestic policy in the U.S. and Canada, and in Australia. So it's more of a forum where we look to where the future might be going, rather than looking at kind of our immediate investment decisions.

Finally, just a follow-up on a question that you referenced a little bit earlier, this is regarding the green credits within the Fall economic update, and I just want to be clear here. Will the provisions that are included in that update, will that impact your spending decisions in Canada versus making a similar kind of investment in Australia or the United States?

I think it definitely makes investments in Canada more competitive with portfolio investments that we're looking at, in the U.S. and in Australia. I think, for our company, we're much more focused on kind of the maturity of the opportunities that we have, Chris. So when I look at kind of our development pipeline, and kind of the phasing or the sequencing of those opportunities, it's more Alberta focused right now or Alberta heavy, I would say right now, and to a lesser extent, Australia focused, we're working to build a bunch of stuff that we've procured in the U.S., but when I look at kind of our newest projects that will come to be, it's really Alberta and to a lesser extent, Australia, and certainly the government policy is helpful in terms of the way we're looking at things for sure.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. At this time, we have no further questions, please proceed with your closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone. That concludes our call for today. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to the TransAlta Investor Relations team.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does indeed conclude your conference call for today. Once again, thank you for attending and at this time, we do ask that you please disconnect your lines.