Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Sensient Technologies Corporation 2018 Third Quarter Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time for the opening remarks, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Steve Rolfs. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning. I'm Steve Rolfs, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sensient Technologies Corporation. I would like to welcome all of you to Sensient’s conference call to discuss 2018 third quarter financial results. I'm joined this morning by Paul Manning, Sensient’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. This morning, we released our 2018 third quarter financial results. A copy of the release is now available on our website at sensient.com. During our call today, we will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures which we believe provide investors with additional information to evaluate the company’s performance and improve the comparability of results between reporting periods. These non-GAAP financial measures remove the impact of restructuring costs, currency movements, the impact of the 2017 U.S. tax legislation, and other items as noted in the company’s filings. Non-GAAP financial results should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for financial information calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is available on the Investor Information section of our website at sensient.com and in our press release. We encourage investors to review these reconciliations in connection with the comments we make this morning. I would also like to remind everyone that comments made this morning, including responses to your questions may include forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our statements may be affected by certain factors including risks and uncertainties which are discussed in detail in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We urge you to read Sensient's filings for a description of these factors. Please bear these factors in mind when you analyze our comments today. Now, we'll hear from Paul Manning.

Thanks Steve. Good morning. Sensient reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.95 in the quarter compared to adjusted earnings per share of $0.89 in last year’s third quarter. Consolidated revenue was up 2% in local currency. Our adjusted operating profit was down this quarter, which is largely due to factors we have been discussing all year, although the impact this quarter was greater. We were also impacted by some unexpected softness and destocking in cosmetic colors. Important to note is that the issues affecting flavors and fragrances are now behind us. The color factors are also short term and do not impact our long-term outlook. Color revenue is up approximately 4% in local currency driven by double digit growth in food colors. Operating income was up approximately 3% primarily due to lower profits and cosmetics against a very strong result in last year's third quarter. The outlook for color is still strong and the third quarter profit dip is due to a short-term correction in the cosmetics market. Year-to-date color's revenue is up 7% and operating profit is up 5%. The Food Color businesses performed well particularly in North America. Natural color sales grew at a double-digit pace in the U.S. The strong volume growth for natural colors was largely driven by new product launches from smaller regional companies and private label producers. Conversely, we have observed that the pace of new product launches from large consumer product companies continues to be slow as they focus on their core brands. They are rationalizing non-core brands and there has also been a very noticeable decrease in seasonal product offerings. Cosmetics reported lower revenue in operating profit in the quarter against very strong results in last year's third quarter. This year's third quarter performance was due to inventory destocking. Over the last…

Thank you, Paul. In my comments this morning I will be explaining the differences between our GAAP results and our adjusted results. During this year's third quarter, we finalized our estimate of the impact of the 2017 tax legislation. Separately our 2017 results included restructuring and other costs. The adjusted results for 2018 remove the impact of the tax legislation accounting and the adjusted results for 2017 remove the impact of restructuring and other costs. Sensient’s revenue was $342.7 million in the quarter compared to $353.5 million in last year's third quarter. GAAP operating income was $50.3 million compared to $52 million in the comparable period last year. The 2017 operating income results include restructuring and other costs of $6 million. And excluding these costs adjusted operating income was $58 million in last year's third quarter. Foreign currency translation reduced both revenue and operating income by approximately 2% in the quarter. GAAP diluted earnings per share were $1.12 in the quarter compared to $0.73 in the comparable period last year. The diluted earnings per share in this year's third quarter include $0.17 of tax benefit related to finalizing our estimate of the U.S. tax law change. For 2017, restructuring and other costs reduce last year's third quarter earnings per share by $0.15. When you normalize EPS results for these two items, adjusted diluted earnings per share were $0.95 in the quarter compared to $0.89 in last year's third quarter. Foreign currency translation reduced adjusted EPS by $0.02 in the quarter. With respect to the tax benefit related to last year's tax law changes, the U.S. government has been issuing guidance throughout the year related to the calculation of the one-time toll charge and other elements of the 2017 legislation. We were able to finalize these calculations in the third quarter…

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from the line of Fintan Ryan from Berenberg. Your line is now open.

Just two questions for me, please. Firstly, you mentioned that the performance in Q3 came below expectations at either level. I'm wondering could you quantify what you had initially expected and what were the sort of the surprises and the moving sort of the quantum of those moving parts. And then will - with those sort of Q3 surprises, should we expect to flow through into Q4? And I know you've said that you are confident that you stabilized the situation overall in the Flavors & Fragrances business? But what does that mean in terms of stabilization into Q4 into 2019? Does this mean that you would expect EBIT to be flush or would you be more confident of getting towards us mid to high single digit long-term target that you’ve mentioned?

So the first one to the question about the Q3 being below our expectations, could we quantify that what surprised us. So what I think surprised us the most or surprised me the most was the impact. I think the SNIP, so the earnings cost was about where we expected plus or minus. I think the impact of the restructuring hangover was the larger factor than I had expected. I think, fundamentally, I underestimated our comparable to last year. Last year, we were able to clear out a tremendous amount of backlog in the third quarter, the amount of which could have constituted weeks, if not a month of backlog. And so I didn’t fully quantify that impact into Q3. So I’d say that’s probably the larger or the largest surprise that I felt in Q3. There was certainly EPS impact of several cents on that one. I think the other one that I did not anticipate fully was the cosmetics destocking. This was - and let me be clear on what we’re talking about here. So it’s not the entire personal care marketing, entire personal care market was up, but there’s different pockets within that market that I’m on speaking to. So where we saw this impact was principally in the makeup sector of the market. Hair care was fine. Skin care was fine. A lot of these other areas we deal and we’re fine, but the makeup is where we saw the tremendous drop-off in stock requirements of our customers. There's not been an overall decline in the end consumer market. And so this is why I describe that as is essentially a temporary thing which would begin to start flowing through in Q4. So, the - those are probably the two biggest surprises for Q3. I think…

We have our next question from the line of Christopher Perrella from Bloomberg. Your line is now open.

On your gross margin, looking at the dip and realizing the onion costs and then some of the raw material cost pressure. Do you expect sequential gross margin improvement in the fourth quarter now that you've lapped most of these issues? Is that going to turn the corner?

Yes. We would expect sequential improvement in gross margin and EBIT margin. Color largely held up continue to be better than 20%. And I think Asia-Pacific got near to the very high teens on EBIT margin. But obviously, Flavor dipped in Q3. But, yes, I would anticipate there would be sequential improvement across the corporation.

And I don’t remember if I missed this in the prepared comments. Have you quantified sort of the expected foreign exchange exposure and headwind in the fourth quarter, I guess at current rates?

So it should be similar. So we were between 1% and 2% in Q3, and I would expect something similar in Q4 as well, probably 2% in Q4.

A similar drag on the top and bottom line or a little bit different top line 2% and bottom line a little less?

Yes, I think that's correct.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line Curt Siegmeyer from KeyBanc Capital. Your line is now open.

On Flavors & Fragrances, last quarter seems like hopefully it was the trough in terms of profitability, saw a little bit of improvement even despite it coming in a little bit worse than I think most expected here in this quarter. So how should we think about the margin improvement trajectory kind of going forward? Is this going to be kind of a slow gradual claw back to sort of where you were and then hopefully where you aspire to get to kind of towards that 20% or will some of these things that you talked about the improvement in service levels and whatnot that you mentioned maybe help you recover some of these volumes in sort of a step up fashion at some point?

Well, so to the first comment you made, yes I would say this is a real trough for Flavors. There is no escaping the fact that Q3 came nowhere near my expectations. I’m very disappointing and quite frankly, I'm embarrassed by what happened in Q3 in Flavors. And so, as you look at where we need to continue to take the business and to maintain and get to this level of revenue growth and profit growth that I've been talking about, step 1, don't have the headwinds. So I think that check on that one and then step 2, it’s continuing to drive the top line focusing a lot on service levels, focusing a lot on sales execution, going after bigger projects, bigger wins. You saw some evidence of our success in doing that in terms of being recognized by at least in the last year a couple of CPG companies in terms of earning our way onto a core list. I think that is a helpful piece. But I think a lot of the growth is going to continue to come in these B&C sectors. Again given our size, we don't tend to have a great deal of overlap with very large flavor companies. Our B&C customers could very well be there, C, D and E customers. So I think it's a good opportunity for us. I think as we generate the revenue and as the volumes improve, yes, we should definitively see a drop to the bottom line. We have the right level of investment from a production standpoint. So I think our production costs can be largely flat. Similarly, on SG&A, we've made the investments in the technical side. Certainly, we will continue there. But I would not anticipate some massive increase in SG&A to reflect the…

And if I could just a follow up on the Colors Group. The cosmetic slowdown as you mentioned wasn’t really foreseen as well. And you talked about that leading into the fourth quarter a little bit, but it sounds like the pace of growth in natural colors has kind of helped study similar to what you had probably been seeing earlier in the year. So I guess the question is this, if cosmetics kind of works through that inventory in 4Q, is there any reason the Color Group shouldn’t return to kind of maybe mid or high-single digit growth as early as 1Q or do you see any other clouds on the horizon that could prevent that from happening?

No. I think what you just said is inaccurate - accurately captures the situation. I think the cosmetics thing it is not a systemic problem. There's not been a change in market demand, there's not been some competitor that's come in and taken our business, there's not been a slowdown in terms of the need for innovation in that market. So the core fundamentals are quite good. So this is again, this is just level rising or level loading the supply chain between us and the producers because to the producers, to the end consumers, the demand continues to be quite good. On the natural color front, we continue to have outstanding results there. This is an area we've talked about for years. We made lots of investments here. I think we are very well-positioned. We had across the Color Group, the whole group was up double-digits on natural colors and you may find this interesting too, we are actually up almost double-digits on synthetic colors too. So the group, Color Group, food colors is executing quite well. We see tremendous growth in a lot of our areas. A lot of this is being driven by not simple building blocks that most folks can just go and buy and trade and sell. That's not where we're getting the wins, the wins are coming on say the top of the pyramid of products. So these are the more sophisticated products with a lot of very proprietary production techniques and applications that that we've developed in-house that has been the single biggest driver in our success in natural colors. So we think that we've got really good momentum in that business and I think that's going to continue in 2019 so the ratios you just described.

As there are no further questions at this time, we will turn the conference call back to the company for closing remarks.

Okay. Thank you again everyone for your time this morning. That will conclude our call. If anybody has any follow-up questions by all means, call the company after the conference. Thank you.

Thank you all for joining us today. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.