Good morning and welcome to SWK Holdings Corporation Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Maureen McEnroe, EVP of IR at Tiberend Strategic Advisors. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining SWK Holdings second quarter 2021 financial and corporate results call. Yesterday evening, SWK Holdings issued a press release detailing its financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2021. The press release can be found in the Investor Relations section of swkhold.com under News Releases. Before beginning today's call, I would like to make the following statements regarding forward-looking statements. Today, we will be making certain forward-looking statements about future expectations, plans, events, circumstances, including statements about our strategy, future operations and the development of our consumer and drug our product candidates, plans for future potential product candidates and studies and our expectations regarding our capital allocation and cash resources. These statements are based on our current expectations and you should not place undue reliance on these statements. Actual results may differ materially due to our risks and uncertainties including those detailed in the Risk Factors section of SWK Holdings’ 10-K filed with the SEC and other filings we make with the SEC from time-to-time. SWK Holdings disclaims any obligation to update information contained in these forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Joining me on today's call is Winston Black, Chairman and CEO of SWK Holdings, who will provide an update on SWK's second quarter 2021 corporate and financial results. Winston, go ahead.

Thank you, Maureen. Thank you for joining our second quarter conference call. As we close the book of our second quarter on June 30, 2021 SWK Holdings had ended the first half of 2021 on solid footing. The developments during the same quarter in recent months as well as robust returns generated by our financial receivable segment and continued strong credit trends led to realized yield of 20.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2021. The engine behind these returns remains our unique investment strategy focused on small and mid-sized life science companies with differentiated patent-protected commercial state products. This business model remains highly effective for SWK given the continued innovation in healthcare and to addressing unmet medical needs, and the need for capital to fund the development of these innovations and bring the resulting technologies to market. Added to that, life science companies continue to make a strong recovery from the COVID-19 pandemics widespread effects. We remain well-positioned to benefit from a niche and the healthcare focus specialty finance sector. We fund growth opportunities for small and mid-sized commercial stage life science companies through the creation of unique financing structures. These deals include structured debt, professional royalty monetization, debt royalty transactions and asset purchases typically range in size from $5 million to $20 million, a market segment often ignored by other structured finance companies. To illustrate its business strategy with a financings made thus far in 2021, in March, we closed a $9 million loan with Sincerus Pharmaceuticals, a 503B compounding pharmacy focused on dermatology customers. More recently in April, we completed a $5 million synthetic royalty purchase with Ideal Implant, a medical device company focused on the aesthetic space, followed in July by a $9.5 million financing with Trio Healthcare to support the company's UK and international launch…

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Kyle Bauser with Colliers Securities.

Hey, Winston. Good morning. Thanks for all the updates today and congrats on a great quarter here.

Thank you.

Maybe just starting on the Enteris side of things, following the build out of operations to support manufacturing of clinical trials and early commercialization of new assets, has this provided some momentum for new partnerships and collaborations now that you're kind of up and running?

Sure. And I definitely believe it has. As we noted in the press release, Enteris has recently signed, I think three new feasibility studies, which I think is a direct result of, I think of all the momentum that they have there. I think as we think about the feasibility [ph] and pipeline, Rajiv started last year in May -- and you're right in the midst of COVID, which was a difficult time to go on board and begin to turn on that program. But here we are, roughly a year past that. And now we're starting to see the new feasibility agreements starting to ramp and facilities open. So I think we're starting to see that momentum come together a little bit.

Great. Appreciate that. And you mentioned it in your prepared remarks, you’ve got over $30 million of availability in cash and revolver, at a relatively low leverage ratio compared to your peers. Question I ask every quarter, but how are we thinking about the leverage ratio now and going forward? Any appetite to take out some more debt?

Sure. Great question. And yeah, I think the answer is definitely yes. We do have much more capacity to support larger credit facilities. I think we're being patient as we -- as the Strategic Review Committee goes through its process. And want to make sure that -- what they recommend and what the Board determines to do in terms of next steps to create value for our shareholders. That credit facility question or the appropriate capital structure will come into play there. And so I think we'll have more updates on what that looks like as they do their work. But yeah. I definitely agree we have much more capacity to deploy the leverage and grow the book. And we'll see how it all comes together.

Got it. Make sense. And just staying on this specialty finance side of the business, you've obviously remained very active in investments post-Q2 as well. How has the environment been? I mean maybe compared to six months ago, are there as many opportunity -- are there less, are there more, is it more competitive? Just kind of wondering what the landscapes like right now?

Sure. Good question, Kyle. The landscape definitely ebbs and flows. I think as we came out of COVID and the economy was kind of rolling back in the fourth quarter, there was definitely a lot more activity it felt like just generally speaking. But we, of course, had lots of opportunities and were able to deploy capital. And in the first quarter, I think we saw very similar trends and that kind of continued into the second quarter. From a competition perspective, our segment of the market continues to be pretty unique and that sometimes we'll see things that are fairly competitive. And then other times we'll be the only folks that haven't kind of look at an opportunity that in some respects you have to scratch your head in terms of how come others aren't really paying attention. But I think we're pleased with the volume of pipeline activities that we have going on and expect to close additional things as we get toward year-end.

Great, great. And then just one more. Regarding the partnership with Cara, we saw another nice milestone. Remind me, I know, you don't disclose the actual milestones, but how many are left? And I think you said in the press release, they could come over the next several quarters. And then lastly, are there other milestones we should be keeping an eye on with separate partnerships? Thank you.

Sure. I wish I could give you perfect clarity into the remaining Cara milestones. But as you know, the majority of that is, and the economics of those are redacted in the filed agreement. There are -- I think actually, in that agreement, the titles of all the milestones are also redacted. So I think all I can say is there's definitely a handful of milestones that remain outstanding. And as you think about what those milestones would likely be, I think the ones that we have are similar to what other ones you'd see in the industry in terms of advancement of clinical programs. And they have an FDA approval and sales milestones, those sort of things. Our agreement is generally not structured all that differently than what other ones you see in biopharma. So I think that's probably all I can say about that. But in terms of new licenses, of course, that is the kind of whole point of the business development program at Enteris. And when you think about the progression from meeting a potential partner through actually getting a license, I think as your future partners, you get to know the technology and kind of the first logical step is really the feasibility studies and naturally, the team working with their potential partner to do to determine the right formulation using technology and then taking it forward, which, of course depends on your partner's development timelines and so forth. So the process does take a while. But that said, we are in yearend two the rebuilding of that licensing program. And we're now getting our first sets of feasibility programs, I think we can say that there's progress that's ongoing. And we'll want to see how those develop. And assuming those feasibility studies are successful, then how they progress towards natural license. But it's good momentum starting to see that now.

That's great. Well, thanks for all the updates. I'll jump back in queue.

Thanks, Kyle. Appreciate it.

Our next question comes from Michael Diana with Maxim group.

Okay, thank you. Hi, Winston.

Hey, how are you?

Good. First, on the finance side. You mentioned you have $6.4 million of unfunded commitments. Are those two existing borrowers or new ones?

Yeah. So those are 2 the deals that we recently closed, the Ideal Implant and the Trio loan facility. So those are existing deals. Those are now, and we'll fund them to the extent that our partners want those drawings. And then of course, they meet the performance milestones that are typically associated with those.

Okay, great. Thanks. And on the Enteris side, your CDMO business. Do you have any sort of pipeline there yet?

The pipeline is building. And I think similar to the Peptelligence licensing pipeline, that's a process that will take a little bit of time to kind of move through. As you think about any potential RFPs that they may be working on. It's hard to do a whole lot of work or for the potential customer to do a whole lot of work in facility until it's really up and running, so they can really see the capabilities and they can adequately market those capabilities. So with the facility now being turned on, I think that those conversations are beginning to build. And there's definitely been interest in it. I think that the company has had a couple of adverse inquiries, actually from potential partners who are seeking capacity. So we'll see how that develops. And then also of course, how that helps facilitate the licensing business as well.

Okay, thanks. And on your strategic review committee, I understand it's ongoing. Do you have any expected or completion date? Or any idea when the process might quote, and even though it probably go on forever, but just this iteration of it?

Sure. Now that's a very fair question. Yeah I guess to state to obvious boards. Board should always be looking at maximizing value for shareholders, and ours definitely has been. Yeah, I think in May -- and so we're approaching the through the end of the third month of them doing their work. So, I don't have any timeline to announce. But yeah, I think that the committee and their advisors are definitely making progress and have accomplished some interesting things for the business. So we'll see ultimately, how that unfolds. And I wish I had a material update to provide and a timeline to provide. But I think suffice to say that, everyone's working hard and is very interested in making sure that the shareholders are rewarded for their trust on us.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Nat Stewart with N.A.S. Capital.

Hi, Winston. Thanks for taking my questions.

Sure. Hey, Nat, how are you?

Good. Congratulations on a lot of tremendous progress this quarter and for the first half of the year. My first question is very closely related to Kyle's last question, but I figured I'd ask again in case there's some more details. Because I'm trying to understand better the process of the feasibility studies. Obviously, these licensing agreements, if you're able to hit some new ones that are good. They can be tremendously valuable. So I like to kind of better understand what the process is there. And like I said, you already touched on this, but also the timeline. And also if kind of in the meantime with those feasibility studies, if there's much in the way of revenue opportunities there.

Sure. So the timeline generally is -- you have your business development discussion. And that will progress to wanting to sign a CDA between the parties which the other CDA to protect our technology and then of course, our pharma partner would want a CDA to protect their know how and their molecule that they're looking to develop an oral formulation of -- and that process can be quick in terms of first meeting to the actual CDA or perhaps there's a couple of meetings and everything about the group like a large pharma. That process may take weeks, months, quarters, and which all make would be surprising. And then you think about small biotech that may move more quickly and more aggressively. That could be just a couple of weeks. So you have that that kind of first timeframe. And then once you get to the point where the parties are working with one another, the feasibility studies will generally be preclinical type and one of the models that we typically use is like a dog study, for example. And so from revenue opportunity that there are $100,000, a couple $100,000 depending on the scope of work and the number of iterations that the team has to do. And the course with all the pharma partners looking to achieve. And then as that process goes on, that can get to lead to additional clinical work that can lead to a licensed kind of right away. Or the pharma partner may want to be actually see some clinical results before taking a license. And there is kind of puts and takes all on the way when you're doing that, meaning that the kind of further you are in clinical development, the better economic terms will be on a license, which is not dissimilar from what you see an industry dire like that. And of course earlier, it is in development, and of course less valuable to the potential economics are. And so, in terms of going from the feasibility studies to an actual license, that can be couple quarters or it can be a couple of years. It just depends on the on the overall process. But along the way, there is opportunities to learn economics on the formulation work on the manufacturing to support your partner and so forth. So the whole goal is to kind of build as big as licensing funnels as we can and increase the number of shots on goal and keep building and building so that as we get into periods over the next 12 months, 24 months, we'll have a building of that of that pipeline that will eventually turn into licenses and really build a what we hoped to be a very viable portfolio of milestones and royalties out of that technology.

Okay, yeah, that's great. That's very helpful. In terms of the strategic review, and this is a little related to my findings, and certainly this will be more true, as you sign more licensing agreements, but the Enteris probably has a lot more value. I think even when you bought it with the developments you've already had in the milestone payments. Is a feasibility study, including any options that might be something like raising some money at the Enteris level, or anything like that? Or is there anything you can reveal? I don't know if that would be a worthwhile thing to do or not. But is that the kind of thing being considered or not?

Sure. Yeah. That's a great suggestion Nat. And then in terms of what all the strategic review committee is considering, I think they're considering anything and everything. And that's definitely a conversation that's been had in the past. And, again, I would very much like to tell everyone exactly what all is being considered and so forth. But I think we can leave it that. SRC will definitely be apprised of your suggestion, and we'll see exactly how it's determined to move that forward.

Okay, great. Just one less kind of minor thing, but I was looking at the warrant and equity portfolio. You have a few things that have had a pretty decent return there. I was just curious how you're managing those? Are you kind of reviewing them quarter-to-quarter? Are you consider them long term buy and hold positions? It looks like some can end up being homeruns potentially or are these things you just kind of assess quarter-to-quarter?

Sure. It's a little bit of both, Nat. And I think one of the challenges with the monetizing those positions is that in most cases, we remain lender to our partner that we know that we actually have a warrant position. And as a result of that we're somewhat limited from a material non-public information perspective and being able to monetize those. And so I think historically, you've probably noticed that we've typically been able to monetize those when there's a change of control other partner company. But when you think about alone, where we get refinanced, and then kind of our cleansing period so to speak completes. I think at that point, we're able to determine whether we're going to de monetize or wait. So it's something that we look at on a quarterly basis. But we're also limited in terms of what we can do with some of these positions until we're cleared from an NPI.

Okay. Well, that's great. Keep up the good work. Really enjoying seeing all the progress.

Appreciate Nat. Thank you for support.

Our next question comes from Scott Jensen, a private investor.

Hey, good morning, Winston. Another great quarter. Thank you. So my question is a little bit of minutia. But when I looked at the Narcan revenue provision quarter and I looked at the underlying sales of Narcan, can you go over again, how you get paid? Is it like a quarter off or delayed because the Narcan sales were fantastic, and we're -- how does that work?

Yeah, good. Great question. I think it's good to clarify for everyone to make sure that everyone understands how these work. So we recognize revenue on our royalties and rears, since we're we don't have very good information on actual sales of our product on which we get paid royalties. We really have to wait to see what we get to do to be able to recognize that revenue. So in the case of Narcan, the payment that we would have received during the second quarter is dragged off of sales from the first quarter. And that's pretty typical for all royalties. Just generally speaking, royalty payments are due anywhere from 45 days and 60 days are kind of industry norms for those royalties be paid post-quarter So, yeah you're absolutely right. Emergent announced a blockbuster quarter if you will for it. And then -- so our royalty payment associated with that in the second quarter will be paid during the third quarter. And that's when we recognize that is revenue.

Great. All thanks for that. And I'll go back in queue.

[Operator Instructions] At this time, I'm showing no further questions. So I'd like to turn the call back over to Winston Black for any closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. In closing, I appreciate your time and attention and look forward to future updates as we continue to advance SWK Holdings. I also like to extend my sincerest wishes of good health to all. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.