Thank you, Rich. Let me begin by providing the portfolio update. Overall, the credit fundamentals and financial performance of our portfolio companies remains sound. At year-end, the fair value weighted average leverage through our first lien investments, including our ownership in FLLP, was approximately 3.7 times and the weighted average cash interest coverage of our first lien investments was approximately 3.1 times, consistent with the prior four quarters. At the end of the fourth quarter, the weighted average revenue and EBITDA of first lien investments in SUNS portfolio, including FLLP, was over $370 million of revenues and over $60 million of EBITDA. While the portfolio is broadly diversified across multiple issuers and industries, we continue to favor larger mid-market issuers, operating in more defensive non-cyclical industries. We feel confident about the prospects of our portfolio companies’ operating performance in 2016. In the fourth quarter, the majority of NAV decline of approximately 4% was due to technical mark-to-market write-downs resulting from the sell-off in the liquid loan market and the remainder was predominantly related to our positions in the prison phone companies, Securus and Global Tel*Link, which I will discuss shortly. As Michael mentioned, we expect to fully recoup the mark-to-market adjustments when these loans are repaid. Equally comforting, at year-end, our portfolio was 100% performing and we have no direct energy exposure to the oil and gas or commodity sectors. At year-end, the weighted average yield on our portfolio was 7.9% when measured at fair value. Our internal risk assessment on a weighted average basis remains at 2 times when measured in fair value and based upon our 1-to-4 risk rating scale, with 1 representing the least amount of risk. SUNS’ comprehensive portfolio, which includes loans in FLLP, attributable to SUNS at 87.5% ownership and investments across 47 issuers in 25 different industries with an average issuer exposure of just over $7 million at year-end. Approximately 99% of the portfolio is invested in senior secured loans, including Gemino, whose portfolio consists entirely of senior secured loans. Of the remaining portfolio, 1% is in unsecured debt and there is a negligible equity exposure, excluding our investments in Gemino and FLLP. When including our investment in Gemino as 100% floating rate, roughly 99% of our portfolio carry a floating rate and 1% carries a fixed rate at fair value. Before I give an overview of our fourth quarter activity, let me provide an update on our strategic investments in both Gemino and FLLP. As a reminder, Gemino focuses on providing senior secured asset-based loans to small and mid-sized US companies in the healthcare sector. Gemino’s healthcare expertise and asset-based lending platform creates a favorable risk return profile that has a low correlation to SUNS’ traditional underwriting senior secured cash flow loans. At year-end, Gemino had $130 million of funded senior secured loans across 36 issuers, having an average outstanding balance of approximately $3.6 million. All of the commitments from Gemino are floating rate senior secured [cash paid] loans. During 2015, Gemino funded approximately $28 million of investments across nine portfolio companies and had full repayments of approximately $24.5 million from 11 portfolio companies. For the fourth quarter, Gemino paid us a distribution of $900,000, which equates to an 11% annualized distribution yield on our cost. The distribution from Gemino increased from 10% annualized distribution at the end of 2014. Gemino had approximately $99 million drawn under its $110 million credit facility at year-end. Now, let me provide an update on FLLP. As a reminder, our strategic partnership with VOYA Investment Management to create FLLP provides incremental long-term capital from a like-minded credit investor that expands our origination capacity and allows us to scale SUNS’ balance sheet more efficiently. At year-end, FLLP had approximately $74 million of first lien senior secured floating-rate loans across 15 issuers with an average loan balance of approximately $5 million. For the fourth quarter, FLLP paid distribution to us equating to a 9% annual distribution yield on our cost versus 7.6% in the prior quarter. Portfolio growth should allow FLLP to more fully utilize its credit facility. When fully ramped, we expect the distribution yield to be in the low teens. At year-end, FLLP had approximately $30 million of available capital under its existing $75 million credit facility. We intend to increase the size of FLLP’s credit facility such that portfolio can have a net debt-to-equity ratio of up to 2 times once fully ramped. Before I go into our fourth quarter portfolio activity, let me make a couple of comments about our investments in Global Tel*Link and Securus, the two prison telephone companies. We have a 1% position at cost in the second lien term loan of Global Tel*Link, which was marked at 70.5% at year-end, and a 3% position at cost in the second lien term loan of Securus Technologies, which was marked at 57% of par at year-end. Together, these two companies comprise approximately 80% of the market for secured telephone and related services to the US prison population. In late 2015, the SEC passed a vote and drafted an order capping interstate and intrastate call rates and fees for these companies. In response, both companies are currently seeking a stay and appeal of the order. The industry experienced similar challenges a couple of years ago, which resulted in neutral to positive outcomes for both companies. While it will take time to work through the legal and regulatory process, the respective management teams are focused on navigating through these rate and fee proposed changes. Based on our current understanding, we believe there is great upside in our investments at both issuers. In fact, we added to our GTL exposure in the fourth quarter with an opportunistic purchase of approximately $1 million of GTL’s first lien term loan at an average price of just under 78% of par. Both companies recently held lender calls to review their 2016 strong budgets. This morning, GTL’s first lien was quoted in the low 80s and the second lien is quoted in the low 70s. Secured second lien was quoted in the mid-60s, up 15% from our year-end mark. As Michael mentioned, we had muted origination activity in the fourth quarter, with investments of approximately $14 million across five portfolio companies, and had sales and repayments of just under $40 million. Thus far, the downturn in liquid leveraged loan market has translated into approximately 100 basis points of incremental yield and new first lien loans, as well as importantly better covenant packages and lower leverage levels. For SUNS, the weighted average yield was over 7% of our originations in the fourth quarter, compared to just over 6% in the third quarter. We believe this is going to continue to be a great environment to invest. And fortunately, we have the dry powder to capitalize on these conditions. Thematically, we have seen select investment opportunities with current portfolio companies that are seeking add-on loans to finance acquisitions that typically would have been underwritten by banks. As a result of our more cautious approach to leverage lending, we have seen opportunities to upsize select investments and reprise some of our existing loans at higher prices and lower leverage levels, as well as having growth in EBITDA from the acquisitions. Recent transactions in the SUNS portfolio that reflect this type of add-on re-pricing opportunity include Acrisure, Stratose and Shoes for Crews. Now, let me highlight a couple of our fourth quarter investments. We funded $6 million investment in the first lien term loan in Shoes for Crews. As a reminder, Shoes for Crews is a leader in slip resistant footwear for the quick-serve restaurant workplace. We have deep experience with this credit and have been a lender to the company since 2010 both at Solar Capital as well as SUNS. In the fourth quarter, we were repaid on our $3 million investment in the first lien term loan and elected to participate in the new senior secured financing. The yield on our new investment is approximately 6.3%, up 50 basis points from our prior investment. We also funded $5 million investment in the first lien term loan of Edelman Financial Services. This was acquired by Hellman & Friedman at a purchase price multiple of over 16 times. Our leverage is just over four times and the yield on our investment is approximately 7%. As I mentioned previously, we purchased approximately $1 million of Global Tel*Link’s first lien loan at 78% of par and a yield of just under 12%. Since the end of the quarter, that loan has been quoted up. And as I previously mentioned, it is currently quoted in the low 80s. I’ll now highlight a few of our fourth quarter repayments. We were repaid at par on our remaining $10.5 million investment in AmeriQual up on the sale of the company. SUNS originally invested $14 million in 2011, and we realized 7.7% IRR in this investment. We were also repaid on our $50 million first lien investment in Paradies Shops. Paradies is a leading player in US airport newsstands under the CNN brand. The IRR on our investment was just over 9%. As a reminder, our sister company, Solar Capital, had originally invested in Paradies in 2010 in support of the acquisition by Freeman Spogli back then. Having deep knowledge and experience with this credit and having the flexibility with both Solar and SUNS platforms provides us opportunities to create longer duration investment opportunities as an incumbent lender where we have great knowledge. Finally, we were repaid at par on our $10 million first lien term loan at KODA, a large specially chemicals distributor. SUNS originally invested in KODA in 2013 and participated in add-on acquisition in 2014. The IRR on our investment was 6.6%. While we’ve seen a traditional slow start to the year of new issuance activity, the market disruption has also slowed refinancing transactions resulting in unit repayment activity. Visibility on repayment to-date in this quarter is approximately $13 million. We have been extremely patient and highly selective with our investments. The pricing levels and structures of middle market senior loans has definitely improved. We believe this investment environment is extremely attractive and are thankful that we have the available capital to capitalize on this environment. Now, I’d like to turn the call back over to Mike.