Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Susser Holdings, Susser Petroleum Partners Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. During today’s presentation, all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, the conference will be opened for questions. (Operator Instructions) This conference is being recorded today, August 8, 2014. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Chip Bonner, Executive Vice President. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone and thanks for joining us. This morning, we released our second quarter 2014 earnings for both Susser Holdings Corporation and Susser Petroleum Partners. A reminder that today’s call will contain forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s beliefs, expectations and assumptions and may include comments regarding the company’s objectives, targets, plans, strategies, costs and anticipated capital expenditures. They are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially as described more fully in the company’s filings with the SEC. During today’s call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are helpful for a full understanding of our financial performance. Please refer to our news release for a reconciliation of each financial measure. With me on the call today are Sam L. Susser, Susser Holdings' Chairman and CEO; Rocky Dewbre, CEO of Susser Petroleum Partners; Mary Sullivan, Executive Vice President and CFO and other members of our leadership team. Last week, we announced that we have scheduled August 28 as the date for the special meeting of Susser Holdings stockholders to consider and vote on the merger agreement with Energy Transfer Partners. We also filed a prospectus with the SEC, which is in the process of being mailed to all shareholders of record as of July 22, along with the related election materials. Assuming an affirmative vote by our shareholders, we would expect to be in a position to close the transaction on August 29, following the shareholder vote. As was the case last quarter, we won’t be able to comment on certain specific details of the timing of the integration, the size of the ETP dropdowns to SUSP beyond our brief prepared remarks. A reminder that the information reported on this call speaks only to the company’s view as of today, so time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate at the time of any replay. Now, I will turn the call over to our Chairman, Sam L. Susser.

Thanks Chip. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us on the call. Despite the distractions of the pending merger, our team once again delivered solid performance for the second quarter. Starting with the merchandise side of the business, same-store sales for the quarter increased 4% over last year mainly driven by fresh food, beer and packaged drinks and reflects both an increase in customer traffic, as well as transaction size. Merchandise margin was in line with our trend at 33.8%. The decline versus 34.3% a year earlier was mainly related to a timing difference in rebate recognition during 2013. Year-to-date, our margin continues to remain strong at 33.9%, which is 20 basis points better than the first half of last year and reflects in large part the continued strong growth of Laredo Taco Company mitigated by pricing pressure in certain other categories. Average fuel gallons sold per retail store increased by 2%, excluding the acquired Sac-N-Pac stores versus an increase of 5.5% a year ago. The modest slowdown in volume growth reflects several things. The first is that we have experienced tremendous growth in gallons the last few years that was well above our historical growth rate. So, we are comping up against really strong numbers. We also continue to see our markets attract additional new competitors, as well as intense pricing and promotional activity by Big Box retailers. And third, we experienced some short-term supply issues in West Texas due to unplanned refinery and terminal outages. This in turn calls transportation capacity shortages as truck waiting times at the available racks significantly increased and loads were sourced from alternate longer haul areas. This part of Texas is already short on trucking capacity due to the demands of the oilfield. Fortunately, the refinery and terminal issues have been…

Thanks Sam. Good morning everyone. Our wholesale fuel business delivered solid performance in the second quarter. As a result, we are pleased to announce the fifth consecutive increase in our quarterly distribution at Susser Petroleum Partners, an increase of 3.5% versus the prior quarter, to almost $0.52 per unit, or $2.08 on an annualized basis. This distribution represents a 14.8% increase over the second quarter of 2013, and is in line with the double digit growth we expected to achieve when we launched our IPO almost two years ago. With this increase, we have achieved a second target distribution level outlined in our partnership agreement, and our Board of Directors has approved the first incentive distribution payment of approximately $64,000 to Susser Holdings, the owner of our IDRs. SUSS will also receive its ordinary share of the distribution on common and subordinated units. Based upon distributable cash flow of $13.7 million, this reflects a coverage ratio of 1.19 times for the second quarter and a coverage of 1.22 times for the trailing four quarters. Susser Petroleum Partners delivered a 19% year-over-year growth in fuel gallons sold, a 31% increase in total gross profit and a 21% increase in adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter. Our existing and acquired sites continue to generate robust growth in fuel volumes and rental income, resulting in an increased distributable cash flow and distributions. The two acquisitions that we completed over the past 10 months have made a meaningful contribution to our year-over-year growth. Also, as Sam mentioned earlier, we are well positioned in the fast growing Texas economy, which continues to support our business by helping drive fuel volume. We added 11 new contract dealers last quarter and discontinued three. This brings our independent dealer count to 624 at the end of June. We…

Thanks Rocky. Good morning everyone. To summarize the consolidated financial results of Susser Holdings, this morning we reported adjusted second quarter net income of $14.3 million or $0.66 per diluted share, versus adjusted income a year earlier of $12.5 million or $0.59 a diluted share. These adjusted numbers exclude the impact of $3.1 million of pretax merger related expenses in the latest quarter and a $26.2 million debt refinancing charge a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the $3.1 million of merger related charges that fall under the G&A expense line was $53.1 million compared to $50.5 million a year ago. Gross profit for the quarter increased almost 15% over last year. Top line growth in sales in gallons that Sam and Rocky covered are primarily responsible for this increase as well as slightly higher retail and wholesale fuel margins. For the retail division, fuel represented 29% of gross profit for the second quarter. On a consolidated basis, fuel represented 36% of gross profit, with merchandise and other inside sales accounting for 64% of gross profit. G&A expense was up $7.1 million year-over-year. As I mentioned earlier, $3.1 million of this was merger related expense. $2.1 million is higher non-cash stock-based compensation expense and $1.7 million of the increase is additional bonus and 401(k) matching accrual versus last year, primarily due to improved performance against internal targets this year. Other operating expenses for the quarter increased by $8 million, but are largely due to supporting 69 more retail stores and a larger wholesale platform than we had at the end of June 2013. We did see a slight increase in credit card fees from 1.6% to 1.7% of retail fuel revenue. Also, utilities increased with the higher natural gas prices driving up electricity costs. Excluding credit cards and utilities, other operating expense, as a percent of merchandise sales decreased by approximately 20 basis points compared to Q2 2013. Consolidated CapEx during the second quarter was approximately $68 million and this includes about $50 million related to new store construction and land purchases. This number does include partnership capital spending of approximately $37 million. SUSP CapEx included $200,000 in maintenance capital, and the balance was for purchase of Stripes stores and other growth investments. Our consolidated revolver borrowings increased by about $27 million since the end of last quarter to fund new stores and expand our land bank. We have $27 million of cash on the balance sheet and $357 million combined capacity on our two revolvers. As of the end of the quarter, our net debt to trailing 12-months EBITDA was about three times on a consolidated basis and 3.6 times at Susser Petroleum Partners. Operator, we are now ready for any questions.

Thanks Ma’am. (Operator Instructions) Our first question will come from Ms. Sharon Lui with Wells Fargo. Please ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning. Just a question in terms of the pace of construction, so I guess, with four stores opened in the third quarter and 17 in construction, can we expect the balance of 21 for the balance of the year or are there potential for additional stores to be opened?

Sharon, this is Chip. We expect to have 17 stores that are under construction today, we expect those to be completed this year and open this year. We expect to start another six stores for the balance of the third quarter, with up to six more in the fourth quarter, which those will open in 2015.

So the total number of kind of new retail units is going to be about 30.

30 for this year.

That will open this year.

That’s correct.

Okay, great. And then just one quick question on the partnership OpEx, do you think I guess the Q2 run rate is a good run rate going forward?

Sharon, this is Rocky, as you look at the operating expenses and the G&A expenses, both for this quarter when we are comping against last year, we did not have the Gainesville in that number, because that didn’t happen until Q3. So, I believe the Q2 number this year would be a reasonable number for a run-rate going forward. We had some unusual expenses that may help us going forward, but obviously there is always unexpected things that happen as well. So, I think it’s a reasonable run-rate.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Ms. Irene Nattel with RBC Capital Markets please ask your question.

Thanks and good morning, everyone. Sam, in your prepared remarks, you noted that beer and packaged beverages were important contributors to the same-store sales growth, but you also noted that you are seeing stepped up competition in certain categories. Wondering if you could provide a little bit more color on which categories are seeing greater competition and how it is that you are continuing to drive the same-store sales growth in beer and packaged beverages?

Good morning, Irene.

Good morning, Irene. This is Kevin. Yes, we are still seeing more competition build on both beer and packaged beverages, especially from the Big Box retailers also from the value discount channel. The way we are really going about it is we are looking at individual markets and we are continuing to go head-to-head with them, where we can to continue to build our sales.

Kind of the pressure categories for the quarter in terms of margin pressure were first, cigarettes, dairy, and candy and snacks were kind of the headwind categories for the quarter. And we had help obviously from Laredo Taco as the both kind of the same-store growth there and the contribution from all the new stores are helping drive food to a bigger mix. Foodservice, which is both Laredo Taco and coffee and fountain drinks and so forth that now account for about a third of our gross profit, 32.6% for the quarter versus 31.7% for the comparable quarter the year before. And that’s helping us fend off the by-store competition from the Dollar Stores and the Wal-Marts and so forth.

Absolutely. I mean clearly that would be a significant differentiator. Sam, if we look ahead, let’s say, two, three years where would you see that foodservice as a percentage of gross profit moving up to?

Oh gosh, I think we will be at, at least 35% of our merchandise gross profit and approaching 40% if you look out 5 or 10 years. We still have the – and I am speaking to what I will call the legacy Stripes stores. With the consolidation of the Sunoco network, those numbers will change over time and that will be a process over the coming years.

That’s great. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Irene.

Mr. Ben Brownlow of Raymond James, please go ahead with your question.

Hey, thanks for taking the question. Just a follow-up on the last question on the competitive openings, you mentioned the Big Box and the discount channels, is it fair to say that you are seeing increased competition across most regions or is it more of a pocket?

Ben, this is Kevin. We have seen a lot of activity coming in South Texas is where we are really seeing a lot of the building going on at this point. The remaining markets are still growing, but not as at the rate as we have been seeing in the Valley markets and Corpus Christi area.

Great, that’s helpful. And just on the partnership side, can you remind us again what your target long-term distribution coverage ratio is and how you are thinking about the debt versus equity financing when you think about the upcoming dropdowns?

Hi, Ben, this is Mary. We are still evaluating what that long-term should be under the ETP ownership. As we have talked in the past, Susser Petroleum had very stable cash flow and felt like we could take that target coverage ratio down over time. With the new companies, little bit of volatility with the dropdowns planned, although we believe that’s going to be mitigated with the larger geographic dispersity. And so we still have some work to do on that as well as the specific debt and equity structure on the dropdown, so a lot of work going on, on that, a little too early to add too much color on that today.

And Mr. Ben Bienvenu with Stephens, please go ahead with your question.

Yes, thanks. Good morning. Could you give a little bit more detail around new unit performance and give us a sense of how returns on these units are trending?

As we indicated in our prepared remarks, our 2013 stores are continuing to increase. Our stores that we build in markets where we do not have a large market share, large presence, they take a little bit longer to ramp up, but overall we are pleased with the returns that we are seeing and the ramp-up that we are getting in these new stores. So, clearly, opening more stores every quarter provides pressure on – with respect to those stores, but long term, they will ramp up. And so far, we are pleased with where we are on our returns.

I will also say that the company has improved its efficiency on new store openings. There was a time period when we were really accelerating our growth from like 12 or 15 stores a year, up to this present 30 level that our rate of efficiency in the first few months was not where we would want it to be. And Sid and the team have learned from that experience and we are opening stores up a lot smarter today and getting to profitability a little bit faster in that regard.

Great, thanks. Good luck.

Thanks.

(Operator Instructions) Mr. Ronald Bookbinder with The Benchmark Company, please go ahead with your question.

Good morning and thank you for taking my questions. Rocky, I was wondering on the fuel profit margin to third-parties, it had been steadily increasing from about $0.045 five quarters ago, up to $0.057 last quarter, but we seemed to see a drop off. Was that because of the acquired third-party fuel distribution over the past year or was there some sort of mix shift between contracts?

Our margin for Q2 was the $0.049 you mentioned and that was consistent with what it was the same period last year, but less than it has been in Q1 and Q4 obviously. Q1, we had an extraordinary quarter. In Q2, we had a rising gasoline market throughout the quarter, which obviously puts pressure on our margins. That was a big factor. And just overall competitiveness in the wholesale space, we experienced pressure. So, we are – with the gasoline market starting to fall a bit in Q3, we are seeing a little improvement, but I would really just say the biggest delta quarter-to-quarter was that we had a great first quarter.

Okay. And on the ETP, could you talk about what sort of multiple SUSP is going to pay for the assets or if you can’t talk about that, how would you determine the valuation for the assets that SUSP will acquire?

Ron, this is Chip. One, we can’t talk about what we would end up paying, but I will tell you that the Board and the Independent Conflicts Committee will have a very big say in negotiating what those dropdowns and what that multiple looks like to SUSP.

I would just build on that, Chip by saying there is tremendous alignment of interest between SUSP unitholders and the Energy Transfer family to drive value for unitholders on both sides over the years here. And so very much the conflicts committee will have to review and approve and do market checks on the pricing of dropdowns, but our interests couldn’t be more aligned. And I feel very, very good about the long-term prospects for SUSP with the combination of our building organic growth story, combined with the dropdowns that ETP is positioned to supply SUSP with for – in the coming years.

Okay. Thank you very much and good luck going forward.

Thanks Ron.

Mr. Ethan Bellamy with Baird, please go ahead with your question.

Hey, good morning everybody. With respect to the dropdowns, what are the gating factors in terms of the speed and the magnitude of those drops and is Energy Transfer considering taking equity as part of the consideration?

I think those are deal specific questions that are not appropriate for us to comment on at this time. But these transactions are certainly complex and involved, and there are a lot of tax issues and of course capital markets issues that have to be resolved, as well as working through the Board of Directors process in doing the right thing the right way. And we have got – a lot of that work has been started, both here and at Energy Transfer, and we will have more developments to talk about in the coming months.

Okay, fair enough. With respect to the ETP transaction and your relationship to fuel suppliers, has that changed at all and has there been any positive development that we might see in margins going forward from the increased scale?

This is Rocky. So ETP, through the Sunoco group, they have obviously a large footprint and multiple suppliers that they work with. At Susser Partners, clearly we have a number as well. We have a larger number of branded suppliers than the Sunoco team has historically worked with. But the specifics of what the future looks like are still being determined. I can tell you, with our dealer network we expect to continue to enjoy good relationships with all of our fuel suppliers we are currently working with.

The scale of this combined company is only going to enhance our ability to buy fuel, it’s one of the several very exciting themes behind industrial logic of this combination. And we are not – we don’t know the specifics of how it’s going to play out, but size is your friend in this business. And the combination here definitely adds to our size and scale.

Alright. Thanks. Good luck.

Thank you so much.

Mr. Sam Susser, there are no further questions at this time. Please continue.

Great. Thank you, everybody. And Mary, Chip, Rocky, thank you for your detailed comments. Kevin, thank you. We are very appreciative of your transparent leadership and your unwavering commitment to our team members and to our investors. I want to thank our investors, our analysts for being with us this morning and for being such an important part of our growth story over these past ten or so years. We are very pleased and gratified by the reaction from the investment community to this transaction. I believe the merger will create a faster growing, stronger, larger, more diversified company. Otherwise, we wouldn’t have entertained their offer. Combined with Sunoco’s well-known brand and strong fuel supply and logistics network, proprietary credit card and its broad geographic reach, this company has the potential to be a major player in years ahead. I want to close today’s call by recognizing our extraordinary team of talented leaders and thank those who have been running like racehorses for the last several months to make this transaction happen and to be ready to contribute to Energy Transfer’s growth story from day one. And I want to thank our 11,000 team members who are responsible for making Stripes the convenience store, customers turn to most in our markets. Without your hard work and long hours, none of this is possible. We look forward to seeing many of you this fall, either our offices or when we are out on the road, or better than that, next time you are in our neighborhood, please come taste our tacos and see for yourself the secret sauce behind our company’s success. Operator, this concludes our call. Make it a great day, everybody. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the Susser Holdings/Susser Petroleum Partners Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. The replay information for today’s call is included in this morning’s earnings news release. The conference center would like to thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.