Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. And welcome to the Suncor Energy Third Quarter 2019 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Trevor Bell, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you Operator, and good morning. Welcome to Suncor's third quarter earnings call. With me this morning are Mark Little, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Alister Cowan, Chief Financial Officer. Please note that today's comments contain forward-looking information. Actual results may differ materially from the expected results because of various risk factors and assumptions that are described in our third quarter earnings release as well as in our current annual information form. And both of those are available on SEDAR, EDGAR and our website suncor.com. Certain financial measures referred to in these comments are not prescribed by Canadian GAAP. For a description of these financial measures, please see our third quarter's earnings release. Following formal remarks, we'll open the call to questions. I'll now hand it over to Mark Little for his comments.

Good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining us. In a volatile quarter for commodity and refined product prices, Suncor continued to deliver strong and consistent results. In the third quarter, we generated $2.7 billion of funds from operations; and $1.1 billion in operating earnings which marks the ninth consecutive quarter where we've generated over $2 billion of funds from operations. The reliable nature of our cash flow, combined with disciplined capital management, resulted in $1.4 billion being returned to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks in Q3. We continue to see significant value in our company and given the market conditions accelerated our buyback program in the quarter to repurchase 1.2% of our outstanding shares for approximately $760 million. At the same time, we continued to strengthen our balance sheet, reducing our debt by $570 million, all of which, yet again, demonstrates the value of our integrated model and our ability to create substantial cash flow and value for shareholders in various market conditions. Reliable production from our upstream Oil Sands assets contributed to our strong results, despite the impacts of planned maintenance in the quarter and continued mandatory production curtailment, which has been much higher than we anticipated at the start of the year. Given our planned maintenance, there was limited availability and opportunity to purchase production quotas from other operators in the quarter. As a result, total Oil Sands production of 670,000 barrels a day was approximately 20,000 barrels per day lower compared to Q2. Consistent with prior quarters, we were able to transfer production quotas among our Oil Sands assets, generating $1.6 billion of funds from operations, and $500 million of operating earnings in our Oil Sands segment. Throughout 2019, Suncor's unique footprint and asset flexibility has allowed us to make the strategic choice to optimize…

Thanks, Mark. And as you previously highlighted, Suncor was able to generate $2.7 billion of funds from operations and $1.1 billion of operating earnings in the third quarter. And that was despite the impact of a weakening business environment; the continued higher levels of mandatory production curtailment; and the plant maintenance we had. Once again, we demonstrated the strength of our integrated model in various market conditions. In addition to returning more than 50% of our funds from operations to shareholders during the quarter in the form of dividends and share buybacks, we also fully funded $1.5 billion of capital expenditures and strengthened the balance sheet by repaying $570 million of debt. So year-to-date we have returned approximately $3.8 billion to our shareholders in dividends and share buybacks, or roughly 46% of our funds from operations, while at the same time repaying nearly $1 billion of debt. As Mark mentioned, we continue to see significant upside value in our company's shares, and as a result we accelerated our share buyback program during the quarter, spending approximately $760 million to repurchase 1.2% of our outstanding shares at less than $40 per share. Year-to-date we have spent $1.8 billion on share buybacks and have repurchased almost 3% of our outstanding shares. We remain on track to complete the authorized $2 billion program that started in May and expires next spring, but have the ability as in prior years to approach our Board for an increase, but that will be dependent on future commodity prices. Looking to the balance of 2019, we've maintained our capital guidance range, but we did narrow our total production range by reducing the top end to 790,000 barrels per day from 820,000 barrels per day. Now we increased our Oil Sands operation's cash operating cost per barrel range by approximately $2. These changes really reflect the ongoing impact of higher mandatory production curtailment than we expected and the product mix strategy that Mark discussed earlier. Now we've also adjusted the guidance range for our East Coast Canada royalties to 13% to 17%, knocked down 4% and that really reflects the impact of third-party outages on the East Coast. Consistent with prior years, we expect to release the 2020 corporate guidance in the coming weeks. We will obviously be looking at that with additional clarity this morning on rail from the Alberta government and further information on where the mandatory production curtailment program will be for 2020. From our perspective the results in the third quarter are to a track record and demonstrate our ongoing commitment to sustainably increasing cash flow and shareholder returns in the short, medium and the long term.

Thank you, Alister and Mark. I'll turn the call back to the operator to take questions. First from the analyst community, then if time permits from the media. Operator?

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs.

This is Emily Chang on behalf of Neil here. Just my first question on CapEx. What do you think is an early rate on 2020 spend and how do you -- how should we be thinking about the cogen annual spend profile of $1.4 billion over the next couple of years?

Thanks, Emily. In the second quarter I think we were asked that question and somebody asked about whether the range from 5.5 to 6 was good and I would say given the fact that we haven't published our guidance, and Alister just spoke to that, I'd say right now notionally that's a good range. One of the reasons our range is going up is because of decisions like cogen and so it's incorporated in that capital spend.

And just one follow up please on the crude by rail announcement this morning. Does this change the way you guys think about using rail as a means of crude export to increase production? Or is it still really an economic decision here?

Well, the economic decision we're faced with is really around should we leave crude shut in or should we produce it and ship it to market by rail. So when you compare those two options, it's economic, which is the whole point of this is that although this natural spread in the marketplace might not say that rail is economic, you're considering that against whether you should -- it assumes that you're already producing the barrel. And so the opportunity here and the whole design of the program is to allow us to produce above our quotas, if we can move the volume up. So we're comparing -- we either leave it shut in the ground or remove it by rail. I think this is a very positive development because the whole purpose of curtailment was to reduce production to align with the takeaway capacity. But I think we all know that ever since that was implemented, the takeaway capacity in Western Canada has declined, which is the exact opposite of what you want to happen when you have excess production. The design of this system is to incent operators like ourselves and the 16 others or the 16 in total that are curtailed to go get rail, increase the takeaway capacity from the entire basin so that we can access markets. And then once the industry has demonstrated that all the production is on and we can move it all and we have all of the takeaway capacity, the government then has the ability to leave the markets. And when everybody has all their production flowing, then they're incented to invest to grow their production. Right now nobody, none of those 16 companies are incented because if they grow production, they're just going to leave it shut in. So the whole design of the program is to try and help get the markets going; allow us to get full value; increase royalties and taxes for the provinces; allow that companies to demonstrate that with market forces we can clear the market. And on top of this development, there's about 200,000 barrels a day of increased pipeline capacity that's coming to market early next year through the work that's happening on Line 3, on the Canadian portion of Line 3, Keystone and Express. So when you look at the incremental rail capacity, which we think is somewhere in the neighborhood of 200,000 to 300,000 barrels a day of additional rail that could be brought to market and another 200,000 barrels a day of pipe, this is super positive for the industry to move forward. And hopefully we'll get some investment going. So that's why we're very thankful for the leadership that the premier and the energy minister have put to this.

Our next question comes from Dennis Fong of Canaccord Genuity.

Just maybe as a bit of a follow on to Emily's question, the thought process for me is that you guys don't necessarily transport very much crude oil by rail, but do have a fairly robust rail operation more geared frankly to the refined product side. With respect to your current obviously really little exposure to the crude oil transportation side, how should I be thinking about your maybe strategy or approach to potentially gaining incremental capacity via maybe some of your peers if they have available capacity to ramp up production by their railroad curtailments quota?

Yes, Dennis, thanks for the question and that was certainly a message in my response to Emily. So I think as we've stated many, many times, prior to this we were moving all of our production by rail, but clearly with the government intervention, we're not able to do that. So we will be taking advantage of this development and the curtailment relief that's been put out by the Alberta government this morning. And in anticipation of that and our longstanding relationship in the rail markets and working with the railways, we actually have direct contracted capacity of 30,000 barrels a day with the rails to move crude by rail. And we will plan to be getting that operational in the next month or two. I don't -- I haven't talked to the folks this morning about how long it will take, but I think it will take a couple of months plus or minus. And so we plan on taking advantage of this for sure to get our production moving.

Okay. Perfect. And I suppose the other -- I guess the other side of it would be given that there are other producers that may be producing and have maybe excess rail capacity that could probably also mean that they have incremental credit that they could potentially sell for you as well?

Yes. The design of the system is to allow the market to actually solve this, so clearly people that are sitting with rail without the production are incented to find people with production to move it by rail. And it also incents producers to go get rail contracts and such. And I think you'll see that this is significant in the Alberta government getting rid of its rail contracts because if people sign up for them, they want to be able to use the rail and so all of these pieces are tied together.

Okay. If you'll indulge me, I have just two quick more. Just quickly on kind of free cash flow and so forth, I understand that, Alister, you didn't make kind of comments around decisions around the NCIB and I know you guys have during the context of this year paid back some significant pieces of term debt, given them that you don't really have any near-term term debt expiries or anything coming due until I believe 2021, should the focus -- or should I kind of read between the lines that the larger focus will be towards returning cash to shareholders via the share buyback program, which if you're on pace as you are today could frankly be exhausted by the end of this year?

Thanks for that, Dennis. No, I would say that we're very measured in where we allocate our capital and we will be very clear on what is going to the stock buyback. We did accelerate it in the quarter, but we're very opportunistic. We saw lots of value in there at these price levels. I wouldn't say that you should assume that the Q3 purchases now we're a new run rate and when we said $2 billion a year, I did say we could go back to the Board if commodity prices would allow that. On the debt side, we have -- well, we don't have any term debt due till '21, we do have $1.5 billion of commercial paper which we used to flex up and down on. So there'll still be a measured allocation to stock buybacks, dividends, capital and debt repayment.

Okay. And then just the last little bit here is just on the guidance, it looks like the baseline specifically at the U2 upgrader had a bit of an extended turnaround going into Q4. Is there any incremental pieces of prep work or anything like that that you guys are focusing on, on an operational basis, just given that this may be a little bit more, call it downtime with respect to the upgrader component of things? And I'll turn it back.

No, it's interesting because we're working on a coker set that was down and actually got put back online during the fire, and so this is kind of an unusual circumstance. It has taken us a little bit of additional time. We don't think that this is characteristic of what we'll see going forward. So this just ended up needing a little bit more work than we anticipated going in. Every time you do a turnaround and you open up these vessels, there's a certain amount of work that you find through the process because we don't have perfect knowledge till we get into it, and so it's caused a little bit of a delay.

And our next question comes from Phil Gresh with JP Morgan.

This is John Royall on for Phil. So -- can you hear me?

Yes. Thanks, John.

So you guys have seen higher cash costs per barrel this year for a variety of reasons and I think some includes reliability. So as we look ahead at the $2 billion CFO improvement target and the guided per barrel cost targets for each asset, is there any risk of offsetting headwinds like labor inflation or other factors that might lead to fewer net benefits versus the $2 billion target?

No, it's interesting because your characterization of the operating costs is -- part of the issue with it is we're low in the production range, curtailment spend much higher than we anticipated. And I think we've been kind of foreshadowing that all along. Originally, it was announced that curtailment would be 325,000 barrels a day for the first quarter; and 90,000 barrels a day on average for the remainder of the year. We won't get to that number essentially until the end of the year. So it's been substantially higher. I think just if you do the math, it's 30% to 40% higher curtailment through the year than what was originally stated. Because it's a high fixed cost business, production is lower, operating costs are higher. And then back to we've intentionally -- as I mentioned in my prepared comments around mixes, we've intentionally shut in low-cost, low-value barrels and maximized or shifted the allocation so we could produce higher cost, but much higher margin. And so our average margin, the net effect of the increased cost and increased margin is we've been able to generate $200 million of incremental cash flow for the shareholder. So the issue with it is, our focus has been on driving value for the shareholder and generating cash flow, not on how do we make the number lower. If we wanted to make the operating cost number lower, we would have done the exact opposite of what we did do. The only issue is we would have lost a whole bunch of cash generation. So we think we've made the right decisions here. Curtailment has created a bunch of interesting dynamics. Going forward, we fully expect curtailment to disappear and next year with this parlance that I've talked about, it will help us to move a lot of volumes that we wouldn't have been able to without it.

Understood. And just the second one, we've seen reports on the spill at Keystone. Do you guys have any commitments on Keystone and either way, what do you think the net effect would be on Suncor and how long do you think it would take to resolve this spill?

I would literally be speculating on all of that. We do move some product on Keystone, and so we'll wait to hear from the operator what it is and I have no idea.

And I'm currently showing no questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Mr. Trevor Bell for closing comments.

Great. Thank you operator. Thanks everyone for attending the call. I know it's a busy earnings day and season, but in particular day. Happy Halloween, everyone. And IR will be around all day. Should you have any more detailed questions, please give myself or my team a call. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.