Good day, everyone and thank you all for joining us. This is S&T Bancorp’s Third Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And now to get us started, I am happy to turn the floor over to CFO, Mark Kochvar. Please go ahead, Mark.

Good afternoon. Thank you all for participating in today’s conference call. Before beginning the presentation, I want to take time to refer you to our statement about forward-looking statements and risk factors, which should be on the screen in front of you. This statement provides cautionary language required by the Securities and Exchange Commission for forward-looking statements that maybe included in this presentation. A copy of the third quarter earnings release can be obtained by clicking on the press release link on your screen or by visiting our Investor Relations website at stbancorp.com. I would now like to introduce Todd Brice, S&T’s CEO who will provide an overview S&T’s results. Todd?

Well, thank you, Mark and good afternoon everybody. We are pleased to announce net income of $26.9 million or $0.79 per share versus second quarter results of $26.1 million or $0.76 per share and third quarter of 2018 results of $30.9 million or $0.88 per share. If you recall, we did have a one-time tax benefit of $0.08 per share in the third quarter of last year that related to a pension contribution. Performance metrics for the quarter were very strong with an ROA of 1.45%, return on equity of 10.97% and return on tangible common equity of 15.69%. I think the big highlight this quarter was the balance sheet growth as total loans increased $162.6 million or 10.7% annualized and deposits increased by $126 million or 8.6% annualized compared to the second quarter. Both loan and deposit demand were very strong across our 5-market footprint and we continue to see nice activity going into the fourth quarter. Total revenue increased by over $500,000 quarter-over-quarter as net interest income increased by $369,000 as the increase in average loan balances helped to offset a 6 basis point decline in our net interest margin, which was impacted by the decrease in short-term rates. Non-interest income also increased by $162,000 quarter-over-quarter, and our efficiency ratio for the quarter was 50.09%, and it was positively impact by reduced FDIC cost. And we also incurred $552,000 in merger-related cost this quarter. Mark is going to provide some color in his comments in a few moments. Our credit results for the quarter included net charge-offs of $4.3 million, driven by existing substandard credit that experienced annual evaluation adjustments. This compared to charge-offs of $2.1 million in the second quarter. Provision expense was $4.9 million, which was driven by the net charge-offs as well as a strong…

Well, thank you, Todd and good afternoon everyone. As Todd mentioned, we are very pleased with total asset growth in the third quarter, where loans grew by nearly $163 million. For the quarter, the experienced growth in both commercial and consumer loans, led by increases in C&I of $67 million, commercial construction of $48 million, residential mortgage of $20 million and commercial real estate growth of $15 million. As you know, we operate in 5 distinct markets, Western Pennsylvania, Central Pennsylvania, Northeast Ohio, Central Ohio and upstate New York. And for the quarter, we saw a positive loan and deposit growth in each market and in each of our commercial, business banking, retail mortgage and consumer business lines. We are very proud of this accomplishment, and these results are a testament to our market-based growth platform that I spoke about and we implemented at the beginning of 2019. During the quarter, we saw C&I revolving utilization rates increase from 41% to 42% over the second quarter, with balance growth being driven primarily by new customer acquisition that resulted in a $76 million increase in total revolving commitments. In addition to the previously mentioned $48 million in commercial construction balance growth, we saw unfunded commitments increase by $66 million for this category. Our residential mortgage balance growth was driven primarily by increased production of 52% year-over-year. We expect to see elevated payoffs through the balance of 2019, particularly in the exceptionally competitive commercial real estate space that will temper growth in Q4 versus Q3. However, we do anticipate growth in Q4 that will allow us to achieve our full year mid-single-digit loan growth expectations. Our commercial pipeline continues to be solid and is approximately 35% larger than at this point last year, and our retail mortgage and consumer pipeline has increased by over 40% year-over-year. Finally, as a result of the current rate environment, we are experiencing strong demand for commercial loan swaps, leading to $1.5 million of fee income in the third quarter. Now, I will turn it over to Mark for additional details.

Thanks, Dave. Net interest income improved by about $400,000 despite net interest margin pressure due to higher average loan balances of $103 million and 1 additional day in the quarter, 2 of the 6 basis points decline in the margin was related to lower prepayment fees in the third quarter versus the second while the remaining 4 basis points primarily related to lower short-term rates. We do have good loan balance momentum going into the fourth quarter with ending period loans $118 million higher than the third quarter average. Assuming another rate cut next week, the quarter-over-quarter decline of almost 50 basis points in the Fed funds rate will result in an estimated 8 basis point decline in the net interest margin rate in the fourth quarter. We do have approximately $1.7 billion of funding that re-prices very quickly and we have also been proactive in adjusting other customer deposit rates. We did see a 4 basis point decline in total cost and liabilities and a 2 basis point decline in interest-bearing deposit costs in the third quarter compared to the second quarter. As we saw when rates were increasing, there is a lag in deposit pricing that should stabilize and then improve net interest margin rate once rate cuts stop. Total deposit growth of $126 million included the maturity of about $52 million of brokered CDs that we did not replace. Netting brokered out, customer deposit increased by $178 million or about 12.8% annualized and are up $460 million year-to-date. The deposit growth mix was distorted in the third quarter by a change in one of our broker deposit programs. Included in money market, interest-bearing demand is $300 million of brokered funds. At the end of the second quarter, $295 million was in money market and only $5 million…

Excellent, thank you. And thank you all to our presenters for their comments today. [Operator Instructions] And we will take our first question from Russell Gunther with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon guys.

Hi, Russell.

Hey, I just wanted to circle back to some of the loan growth commentary which was very helpful. As you look out to 2020, so I understand the headwinds we have got on the pay-downs in the fourth quarter, but as you are looking out into 2020, what do you expect the loan growth drivers to be both from an asset class and geographic perspective?

Yes. I think geographically entering into the DNB markets will help. We have seen good growth out of Central Ohio. And we’re starting to see better growth in Western Pennsylvania as well. We’re rebuilding some of our construction pipeline and seeing decent activity from commercial real estate activities. The perm market is really where we are seeing some payoff pressure. Our C&I growth, we have added a fair number of bankers in the C&I space and that’s what’s really providing some activity in that line item as well. And we are also seeing pretty consistently strong growth in Central Pennsylvania as well.

And also the small business channel continues to resonate record loans. And as Dave indicated in his comments, the mortgage pipeline is up as well.

Yes. We have added a number of loan officers, mortgage loan officers to our ranks as well. And that’s driving some nice growth. The strategy of looking at things from a market perspective and then integrating the business lines into the markets is really paying dividends for us, particularly on the consumer and retail mortgage and small business areas.

Right. So we just kind of came out of our management planning sessions a few weeks ago and there is a lot and lot of opportunities across our footprint to really to just drive good core organic growth, and so that will be filling in some product sets in some markets some will be – we have added some people that we will start to see more tangible results in 2020. But we like our position with the markets that we are in, with the people that we are in and we would expect to continue to hit those organic growth targets that we’ve talked about.

That’s great color guys. I appreciate that. And then switching gears to the margin. Mark, I appreciate your thoughts on the upcoming quarter. Could you just help us what that contemplates, if anything, from the quarter of the upcoming deal close and then how that, from a purchase accounting perspective, may factor into the reported margin going forward?

Right. So with – DNB has maybe a 20 or 25 basis points lower margin than we have. That’ll pretty much be offset by the anticipated purchase accounting adjustments. So we think we should kind of level back out going forward, but those two offset each other approximately.

Okay. So it’s just for simplicity’s sake easy enough for us to just kind of think about the core margin trends that you laid out, about 8 basis points of compression from two rate cuts as something we could extrapolate going forward should the Fed continue to cut, or do you believe you have the ability for deposits to really inflect lower and begin to mitigate any incremental cuts?

No, I think at least for the next several cuts if they go beyond the additional one that we expect next week, I would still expect around 4 basis points initial compression after each Fed cut. The bounce back would only come in time after they stop with the lag in the deposit pricing.

Okay, great. And then last one for me is on the asset quality front, I appreciate the comments about charge-offs higher this quarter, but could you just give me some broad strokes outlook for how you see the environment? Is there any flashing yellow signs? Are you concerned about energy for example and what your restaurant exposure is just some hot button issues and curious as to how you guys are feeling about those related portfolios and asset quality in general?

Yes, Russell. I don’t think it’s anything systemic. I mean we had – the charges were just different asset classes in different markets, too. Pat, you are with us, too. You may want in...

Yes. Russell, this is Pat. I am not sure if there is anything at least in our footprints, that’s pointing right now to a lot of red flags. Hospitality is obviously an area where we watch carefully and I think everyone is watching carefully if we are overbuilding in certain markets. Some of that you can relate back to the energy boom that happened a few years ago, but others is just simple overbuilding that you are looking at. And we take kind of a close look at what’s going on across all the footprints and any type of diverse economic situations in each industry, so whether that would be trucking, hospitality or things of that nature. And our exposures in a lot of those industries right now that seemed to pop up certain red flags are not extremely substantial.

Great. Well, thank you all for the help. I appreciate you taking my questions.

Thanks, Russell.

Thanks, Russell.

[Operator Instructions] We will move next to the line of Collyn Gilbert with KBW.

Thanks. Good afternoon guys. Just wanted to inquire a little bit more into sort of your deposit strategy, how you guys are positioned, maybe where you are seeing good growth coming in? And then also if you could talk about within your NIM guide, Mark, sort of your assumptions you are making on the deposit pricing or deposit cost side?

So our strategy this year, we have been a little bit more aggressive over the course of a lot of this year with some money market promotions and a little bit better pricing on the CD side and less – prior to probably mid last year, we were pretty strict on our CD rates for new customers. We are seeing a lot of exiting with that. So, we lined up on that and that helped stem the tide on the CD side, but we have seen good both money market and CD growth over the past year or so and that has helped our DDA growth. The C&I push on the commercial side has also helped a lot to generate a lot of DDA balances. So we are – with the big buildup in deposits that has shifted some of our funding mix away from the wholesale side to customer deposits, which don’t react as quickly as the wholesale side, so that probably has made us maybe a tiny bit more asset sensitive than we would have been. So we are taking a look and we are – with the Fed moving down, we are kind of resetting some of our product offerings and really reevaluating those taking a little bit of a hiatus and probably come back with something either later this year or early next year after we kind of see where – get a better idea of where things settle and then also in how we want to approach the DNB market with any deposit promotions.

And some of those start – the promotional time starts to roll off in December, so we can start to hit some of those rates in December and then...

Right. We have seen some – a little bit easier comp competitively. It hasn’t been as tough as it was earlier this year, for example. I think the competition has been a little bit more in line with the market or the kind of wholesale rates. So we have seen a little bit less competitive environment. And as Todd mentioned, we did put on a fair amount with this promotional money market that starts to roll off in December over the course of the next probably 10 months after that.

Okay. Do you happen to have what kind of the blended rate is on that promotional money market slug that’s set to roll off?

It’s currently priced – most of it is priced at 2.5, probably about two-third of it at 2.5 and maybe another one-third at about 2.15.

Okay, okay. And do you have a sense of how the deposit pricing in the DNB market compares to your legacy PA markets and then also what you’re seeing in Ohio?

From what we have seen I think the Ohio market tends to be a little bit more competitive, especially up in Northeast Ohio. DNB is more similar, I think, to Central and Western PA. We haven’t seen a lot of different – there are some different players in there. There are some – I think there is more larger institutions in that DNB market. But we haven’t – or as of yet though it doesn’t appear that the pricing is significantly different than what we have in our Western and Central markets.

Okay, okay. That’s helpful. And if you addressed this in your opening comments, I apologize I was a little late hopping on, but the buyback kind of how are you thinking about that or a buyback and just sort of capital management at this point?

We did get – we did do another authorization for $50 million that goes through March of ‘21. Right now, we are watching, it depends on – we do have a lot, there is a lot of things going on with the merger, with the implementation of CECL. And so we will take a cautious look, but it will depend on the price and the market. So we will continue to evaluate that.

And some of the loan growth helped to utilize some capital this quarter as well.

Okay. Did you give preliminary guidance on CECL, Mark?

No. We are still – and we are making good progress and we have our models in place but they haven’t been fully tested. And we have an independent model validation coming in. So we are going to hold off on providing any firmer guidance until we get through all that. So we don’t anticipate providing any firm numbers until the fourth quarter release.

Okay. Okay. That’s good. I will leave it there. Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Collyn.

Thanks, Collyn.

And gentlemen, at this time we have no signals from our group. [Operator Instructions]

Jim, we do have one question that came in over the e-mail that I want to address.

And it was just asking about the increase in accruing TDRs this quarter, so I will let Pat.

Yes, sure. This is Pat. We did have a TDR, a new TDR. It was a long-term customer, an operating company which is secured by a real estate. We have current values. The borrower had experienced some short-term cash flow issues, so we had restructured the credit. We had previously – and I think early in 2018 had this credit downgraded and adversely rated. So therefore, continues to accrue. It’s always been current. It’s continued to make payments. But because of the restructuring and the problem in the risk rating, it caused them to fall into the TDR status.

So good. So if there are no further questions I just want to thank everybody for participating in today’s call and we look forward to talking with you in January for our fourth quarter results. You all have a good day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s earnings release and we thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines and we hope that you enjoy the rest of your day.