Great, thank you. So I think in general, I would say, there is a lot of energy around defund the police and there are certain segments that I will call extreme segments of defund the police, where they are actually being quite literal. Fortunately, that’s a bit of a minority, but it’s a significant minority actually, that’s been our observation. I think the core of the movement, as I mentioned earlier is really more around how we re-imagine, and re-prioritize how policing gets done, so that they continue to un-overpolice [ph] less and underserve more. I mean, we want to move policing where they’re appropriately serving at-risk communities, particularly around gun violence. One of the interesting things that I’ve observed around what’s different kind of post-pandemic, in terms of how city council meetings happen, is before, you’d have to be really motivated to kind of drive down to City Hall and participate in a discussion around a funding issue and the like. In this world now, where things are being done digitally, all of a sudden people can show up from their living rooms through Zoom or whatever and proffer any amount of opinions that they have on things, and that was a little bit of what we saw in a few of our renewals, where this isn’t very active, mobilized front, where people are saying things like defund police, but in a very not constructive way, I guess I would say, because it’s just not practical to abolish the police or cut their budgets by 50%, and expect that you can have public safety outcomes. And so – but what we’ve tried to do in that environment, I think, we talked earlier about our renewal taskforce. We’re always pretty intentional around how we communicate and discuss our value proposition with customers so they can feel good about it and then take that forward. We’re not actually doing the presentations in many of these city council meetings. It really has to be the police department and the local elected officials that have a really good understanding about how the technology is being used, applied, and the difference that it’s making, in achieving public safety outcomes. And we kind of give them the tools, the data to be able to do that and be able to articulate it, but they’re the ones, really carrying the water. And I think in this particular environment, we’ve just been hyper, I guess, aggressive about making sure we’re getting in front of folks and reminding them of the great work that we do together as a team and that’s been very, very successful. We’ve seen I think, at this point in time, again it’s – we’re only halfway through the year, but, I mean, we’re basically batting a thousand on the renewals, notwithstanding the last customer we talked about in the last quarter’s earnings call, the Atlanta Smart City initiative, but everywhere else, we’re running a really good track record. And it’s really quite affirming to hear the terms indispensable and critical have really come about when we’ve had conversations with our customers around the value proposition. They’re kind of coming back to us and saying, hey, I cannot do without ShotSpotter now that I have it deployed. I see what it does, I can’t go deaf, dumb and blind to incidents of gunfire, that we now know, we now know 80% to 90% of the time that a gun is fired, people don’t call 911 because it’s become so normalized. So that’s a pretty scary proposition to a police department that has that real experience with our solution to know now that they’re in a much better place to be aware of it and respond. And so we’ve been very successful as a result of that.