Greetings and welcome to the Sportsman's Warehouse Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host Rachel Schacter of ICR. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. With me on the call is John Schaefer, Chief Executive Officer and Kevan Talbot, Chief Financial Officer. Before we get started, I would like to remind you of the Company's Safe Harbor language. The statements we make today will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which include statements regarding our expectations about our future results of operations, demand for our products and growth of our industry. Actual future results may differ materially from those suggested in such statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described in the Company's 10-K for the year ending January 28, 2017 which we expect to be filed in the next few days. We will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures during today's call. Definitions of such non-GAAP measures as well as reconciliations to the most directly GAAP financial measures are provided as supplemental financial information in our press release, included as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K we furnished to the SEC today, which is also available on the Investor Relations section of our website at investors.sportsmanswarehouse.com. Now, I would like to turn the call over to John Schaefer, Chief Executive Officer of Sportsman's Warehouse.

Thank you, Rachel. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us today. I will begin by reviewing the highlights of our fourth quarter and full year performance and then discuss our progress on our strategic initiatives and thoughts on the coming fiscal year. Kevan will then go over our financial results in more detail and review our outlook, after which we will open up the call to your questions. Looking at our fourth quarter financial performance, net sales grew 6.2% to $221.4 million and same-store sales decreased 5.2% while EPS was $0.25, $0.02 below our expectations mostly due to weaker than expected top line as a result of slower firearm demand post-election combined with anniversarying difficult compares in December and January due to the San Bernardino tragedy and executive orders in the prior year. Despite the challenging overall retail environment, there were some bright spots in the fourth quarter which I will discuss in more detail shortly. For the full-year net sales increased 10.4% to 780.0 million, same-store sales decreased 0.7%. Adjusted net income increased 13.4% and adjusted EPS increased 13.1% to $0.69. I'd like to briefly review a few accomplishments for the year. Number one, we continue to set ourselves apart from the competition and outperform our peers through our best-in-class customer service, rest of product, unique localization strategy, low-cost business model with high returns and disciplined execution as demonstrated by a relative pure performance. Number two, despite the promotional retail environment, we were able to maintain our everyday value pricing and disciplined promotional calendar resulting in flat gross margins for the year. Third, we managed expenses while this year in a challenging operating environment as evidenced by relatively flat adjusted SG&A as a percent of sales despite a 0.7% same-store sales decline in fiscal 2016. We continue…

Thanks John. Good afternoon, everyone. I’ll begin my remarks with a review of our fourth quarter and full year results and then discuss our outlook for fiscal year 2017. My comments today will focus on adjusted results. We have provided these results, as well as an explanation of each line item and reconciliation to GAAP net income and earnings per share in our earnings press release which was issued earlier today. Net sales for the quarter increased 6.2% to $221.4 million from $208.5 million in the fourth quarter of last year with the same-store sales decrease of 5.2% due to the slower postelection firearm demand combined with difficult comparisons in December and January as a result of the San Bernardino tragedy and presidential orders issued in the prior year. We completed our planned 11 annual store openings or 11.6% square footage growth by the third quarter of this fiscal year. So we did not open any new stores in the fourth quarter. Turning to our same-store sales by each of our three store groupings which are; one, base stores, two, new stores or acquired stores that have been in the comp base for two years or less, and three stores that were subject to competitive openings which we define as a new competitive entrant into a market within the past 18 months. In the fourth quarter excluding the seven stores in our comp base that were subject to new competitive openings, our same-store sales decreased 4% compared to the fourth quarter of last year. Our 41 base stores saw same-store sales decreases of 5.1% in the fourth quarter. In addition, our 16 new stores saw same-store sales increase of 0.5% in the fourth quarter compared to the corresponding period of the prior year. Finally, our seven stores that were subject…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Seth Sigman with Credit Suisse. Please proceed.

Thanks and good afternoon. Obviously there has been a lot of volatility in this industry in the past, I guess we don't know if this time is going to be different or not but can you give us a sense of some of the steps that you may be taking internally to navigate this period whether that's expanding into new categories to diversify the NICS, and really leverage some of those local advantages that you have or - is there an opportunity maybe take some cost out of the business to help navigate this period. Any sense of some of those steps you may be taking that that could help here. Thank you.

Well Seth I think, we're obviously very cognizant of SG&A as we have been since we became a public company and well before that. So we as always we're watching payroll very closely. I think we’re very good at managing payroll on a day-to-day and a week-to-week basis and that obviously will continue. There are certain programs that we are going to increase because they were very effective last year while there are other programs that we're probably going to decrease a little bit. In terms of category expansion, we've been working for the past couple of years obviously on private label which we're spending a lot of time and effort to continue to grow. And we've been spending a lot of time in the camping area which we think is a big winner for us not only from a product innovation standpoint which unfortunately hasn’t been a lot, but I think there's still a lot of room for product innovation in camping, and from an attractive avenue for nontraditional customers if you will or millennials to really visit our store and look at our product offering. We had 17 million visitors to our store and a lot of them are looking at the offering of guns online and a lot of them are looking at product reviews. And a lot of them are looking at just information we have online and all these things I think will ultimately benefit us with more people coming into the store. I think the fact that we’re in the use category really is going to help us maintain that historical level of 5% to 8% growth in firearms. And frankly Seth I got to tell you from a long-term perspective not having a lot of these events blips really helps us as a company because we are more focused on the use firearms and hunting in the outdoor shooting sports. And while these blips are nice short-term benefits it's really that solid base of customers that buy firearms for use that really is our bread and butter. And I think the more we go through this year the more that will become evident.

Okay, that's helpful. And then I guess the other key change has been the competitive landscape quite a bit of disruption currently with Gander filing recently. I know you don't have direct overlap with them but is that and the other disruption in the industry does that create strategic opportunities maybe to expand into new markets that you've been less penetrated in. Does it create other benefits maybe working closer with certain vendors or getting access to products you haven't had historically. Clearly it helps solidify your position in the business just trying to understand where that takes you? Thanks.

I think it’s all of the above Seth. I mean let's talk about the 162 stores I think they closed four or five already - so around 157 stores that may or may not close depending on what happens in the filing. But one would certainly anticipate that there'll be store closings in the Midwest and while we've always said that we believe we have a 300 store opportunity, we've always said we’ll probably never going to go with the Northeast and the Midwest is probably - one of the last places we’ll go. I think that's a huge opportunity for us. If you look at the Midwest you’ll see that Cabela's and Bass are already in the major markets of Minneapolis and Milwaukee and Chicago and Indianapolis in Cleveland and Columbus, Pittsburgh. But there are an awful lot of small communities that you know you can only do $5 million or $8 million and that’s our bread and butter. There are places like Wausau, Wisconsin with 50,000 people that you know has access to the entire Northern Wisconsin area that has a Gander there and if should that go way that's just one example of a huge opportunity for us. So I think there's a whole lot of whitespace opportunity for us. As you said we only compete against them in three markets so if they in fact have to liquidate a substantial portion of their inventory, that's really not going to affect us in any way. I think also, if it's a liquidation, the people that drive - that go to the website now can go to our website and we’ll probably come more to our website. And then lastly, you mentioned vendors, that’s a whole lot of product being sold that’s probably not going to be sold anymore. So I think there is going to be some significant opportunistic buying opportunities for us as we go through the year not only just on standard product probably on special make-ups as well. So I think the consolidation of the industry, not just from the mom-and-pop area but from some of the big boxes with Bass and Cabela's getting together, now Gander in a filing really gives us a whole lot of runway and a whole lot of multiple areas in which we can grow. Our challenge is to grow effectively and cost effectively and in a steady pace such that we maintain our discipline and we maintain our customer service and that’s kind of what we intend to do.

Okay. Thanks for the color and good luck.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Peter Benedict with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed.

Hi guys, just question on two things first on the first half I mean John you said you’re going to conservative stand for, I mean you clearly have a good feel for the first quarter Cabela's get top during the second quarter, I mean are you envisioning kind of that first quarter trend to get even worse in the second quarter and then start to get better just trying to understand - how we should be thinking about you using the term conservative for the first half that’s my first question.

To answer your question there Peter yes, it is going to be a difficult comparison for us both in the first quarter, as well as in the second quarter. As we look to the back half of the year, obviously those comparisons get a little bit easier but it’s a new firearm demand environment for us given the results of the Presidential election. So we are continuing to monitor the demand situation and we’ll look at things as we go forward, but that's how we see the year as we look at the events of the second quarter of last year and then looking beyond into the back half of the year.

Okay, that’s fair. And then how do you think the CapEx flexibility I mean the second half doesn’t get much better - some of the CapEx this year is for stores for '18, but at what point John do you have to make a decision say hi, we need to maybe throw some of the store growth. What are the trigger points that you’re going to be watching in order to make a decision like that?

Well there is a lot of factors I know you directed that question to John but I’m going to jump in here, there is a lot of factors that we’re looking into as far as store growth goes. Obviously writing interest rates will have an impact there, how close we are to our projections and how the cash flow ultimately ends up. As we've indicated, we've taken a very conservative approach. We think that we’ll still be able to continue to carry out our 10% square footage growth increase into 2018 but given our relatively inexpensive model, our lead times as far as for our stores if we're remodeling an existing store can be as short as you know its four months. So we have a little bit of time still to make these decisions, we’re evaluating that as we look at our 2018 growth plans. And certainly to the extent - the results don't deliver if that is indeed the case we certainly can pull back on those growth plans which would lower the CapEx numbers for this year.

Okay. And that's - sorry John, go ahead.

Just keep in mind that our strategy has always been to open stores with free cash flow and have enough money to pay down debt and we’ve been able to do that in a relatively positive manner over the last few years. And we are well-positioned regarding our debt covenants with our loan base. So we have never taken the approach where we’re going to grow you know and use a significant portion of debt to finance that growth. If we have a downturn and we have to use a portion of debt to finance that growth, we still have plenty of flexibility moving forward and plenty of cushion in our cash flow model and that gives me some real comfort that 2017 is pretty solid and we’ll look at 2018 as we go through the year in 2017.

Okay, that's fair John. And just last question maybe Kevan - you gave us a little color on the SG&A view for this year. How you think at about gross margin I mean obviously hunting and shooting category generally lower margin, so is that playing a role you probably mix up a bit there but when we think about consolidated gross margin for 2017 how are we thinking about that view on a year-over-year basis? Thank you.

Couple of factors that are playing into our guidance here as you alluded to it’s the lower margins, firearms and ammunition categories softened a little bit. That does have a little bit of a tailwind from a margin perspective. However, as we've seen in past years and as we saw in the fourth quarter and John alluded to in his remarks, we do anticipate that there will be a little bit more of a higher promotional environment that is going to put downward pressure on the gross margin. So as we look to the full year, we are expecting our gross margin to decline slightly not significant because we do have some tailwinds as well, but overall we think that there will be promotional activity will continue throughout the year and ultimately that will have the negative impact year-over-year on our gross margin.

Okay, fair enough. Thanks good luck guys. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Daniel Hofkin with William Blair & Company. Please proceed.

Good afternoon guys. A couple of questions. Just back following up on the guidance, you know negative 9% to 11% in the first quarter for the comp, it sounds like the second quarter especially with Orlando events spilling over to June and July last year but that isn’t going to be much better it might be similarly negative. Which implies to get to negative 4% to 6% for the year that you're talking about just barely down on balance for the second half. I’m just wondering can you help us - give us some comfort that that's - or how you get to that level of improvement in the second half. And whether - what gives you confidence that that's still conservative for the second half that’s my first question?

Part of it has to do with the fact that the seasonal nature of the business roughly 60% to 65% of our business is in the last half of the year. So the back half of the year carries more weight than the first half of the year so that’s part of it. Obviously as we look at the fourth quarter and the results that we just delivered here, we’re anticipating a much easier comparison as we go into the fourth quarter which is the largest quarter of the year. In addition, we got additional 11 new stores coming on board as we historically seen and as our results have shown here, those new stores as they come on board, they outperform our base stores and they help bring that same-store sales up for the year. So all of those factors there help us feel comfortable that the annual guidance number from a same-store sales perspective is achievable.

Achievable but maybe not as conservative as your first half or first quarter guidance?

I don't know that we’ve changed - I mean our outlook has always been conservative for the year how it breaks out quarter-to-quarter is really a factor of what was going on in each of those quarters individually. And as you get to the back half of the year other than that little run up to the Presidential election which then dropped right off the cliff in the fourth quarter. The second half of the year didn't really have any events that really were impactful. It had some conservatism, there were some hesitation as you recall during the preholiday period. All those things present a relatively easier compare in the second half of the year. So we still look at it conservatively, I still think that that's our opinion as we sit here today.

Okay. And then just touching on the store model and obviously it sounds like 2016 class continued to perform well. You've talked about the new stores doing kind of low double-digit, EBITDA margins fall well and 20% plus ROIs pre-tax. How does this new operating environments you know assuming this is the new normal and next year maybe we’re growing a little bit off of it but how does this new environment affect those metrics for margin and ROIs here at the store level?

They don't, I mean we look at a new I mean - if we went into a market two years ago and thought it was a $10 million market you know, we’ll put a store there. If we go into a market this year now and we don't think it's a $10 million market in these environmental conditions, we’re not going there - if it’s a 50,000 square feet stores and we don't think it’s going to be $5 million in that market we don't go there. I mean keep in mind we have hundreds of locations to choose from and we literally have a list of locations that are real estate folks are looking at constantly and it's in the you know it’s 80 or 90 stores that we’re looking at and we’re picking 12. So we look at today's environment, we look at the impact of what's going on today and then we look at that market in relation to what's going on today. So while there is - if you look at 90 stores two years ago or in 2013 there were probably 50 that were slam dunks, maybe those 90 stores today only represent 30 that are slam dunks but only doing 12. So I don't think - I mean our metrics do not change if they don't get double-digit for all EBITDA and 20% ROIs seen in year one, we don’t go there.

Okay, that's helpful. Thanks, best of luck.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Stephen Tanal with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Hi guys, thanks for taking my question. So just - I'm still struggling with this 1Q guy, the hunting and shooting category compared it doesn't look particularly tough and the NICS data that came out in February is down less than what we just saw yet the comp guidance obviously is assuming things get worse. How would you sort of color that to help me think about that?

Well if I'm not mistaking, the February NICS data was down 12%. So I would have to say it is in line with the NICS data that we have seen. So we're sitting seven weeks into our quarter so we’re - and we’re halfway through. So I mean I don’t know what else to add to that, but that's what we’re seeing.

Got it, okay. I’m looking ex-permits and I think ex-permits - you average that to something down 8ish or so in 4Q and down 7% in February but anyway I guess without the permit fair enough so that helps. And I guess - I think in the past periods are really challenging, you were able to sort of talk to the mom-and-pop's and what was going on there I think clearly there's a bit of a inventory build that you made some comments there. But if you could just share anything with respect to kind of your local competition your through competitive set, how are they fairing and how do you see that shaking out as you get through this year?

We're planning for it to be consistent with what we've seen in the past and you’ve indicated that in run ups the mom-and-pops have build up their inventory and then have - it’s created a more of a promotional environment which is what we anticipated for 2017. As John's indicated, our inventory levels are below last year on a per store basis. We feel like that that provides us flexibility to take advantage of some opportunistic buys and that will allow us to compete better in this promotional environment. So that's how we’re looking at these things, but yes it's no different, we refer the same things and it happens every time if there's a run up the mom-and-pop’s stock up on inventory and that creates a little bit of over inventory that creates a more promotional environment.

Got it. But no real signs of stress in that cohort that you could tell share loss that kind of thing?

Nothing we’ve seen yet we’ll continue to monitor that as we go through this year.

Got it. And just lastly I wonder if you wouldn’t sort of venture I guess on Gander here obviously the stalking horse deadline was today for that bankruptcy process not too many strategics out there that would seem to participate and I think a pretty big inventory number there and some chatter that maybe Hilco was interested. Any sense - do you think this goes dark I mean this is the third time they have filed now any view that you might care to share?

You know Steve deep from the Midwest I love Gander, I'm sorry to see that it's entered Chapter 11 once again but frankly I've been in like one store in the last three years. So I don't know that I know what their struggles are or what their inventory looks like on an individual store-by-store basis. So I look at it for a more macro standpoint that the Midwest is now a big opportunity for us.

Fair enough. All right, thanks a lot guys?

Thank you. Our next question comes from Peter Keith with Piper Jaffray. Please proceed.

Hi, good afternoon, thanks for taking my question. First off I just wanted to think about the results that you reported the last two quarters relative to the NICS data and I guess what’s kind of interesting coincidence that we look at Q3 I think you said your space that the NICS business were up 17 and your comps positive 2. And then to report your NICS data was down 17 and your comping down five. My direct question would be, why is that when the NICS data seems to have pretty strong, and your comps increased at a lower rate than when the reverse happens and NICS data declining.

I think as you look at the NICS data and you analyze the data, particularly the last two quarters you guys take into account the state of California. California had some change with respect to their firearms loss and there was some MSR only, some tactical only gun shops in California that with those changes in firearms laws within that state basically had to liquidate their inventory. And so if you break out the state of California I think you will see a much closer comparison with our results versus the states that we're in obviously because we're not tactical only shop. We do sell hunting and other use products. John referenced one of those statistics. We saw great results in those categories in the fourth quarter. It's the personal protection that was up significantly in the prior year so the use categories performed very well for us in the fourth quarter. So I’m not looking at the same numbers that you're looking at and I would speculate that it's the state of California.

Okay. Thanks Kevan. And then Kevan maybe another direct question for you just in regard to the covenants. So you had mentioned your debt to EBITDA ratio right now at about 3.5, your full turn above the covenant ratio. Kevan I'm just looking at the filings, looks like your covenant ratio does step down by a full turn over the next 12 months and you're guiding for lower EBITDA. Do you guys get pretty close to that covenant level 12 months from now and if so, are you thinking about that that in terms of your capital allocation.

Just couple of quick points of clarification. Our covenant currently is 3.5 on the leverage ratio, our actual results are less than 2.4. Our covenant does step down by the end of next year but it steps down to - I believe it's 2.85 going off top of my head. As we have modeled and projected we've done some very scenario analysis that we believe that we still have plenty of cushion based upon on these results and it would have to decline - the mark would have to decline fairly significantly over where we're currently projecting which as we've indicated we feel is very conservative and we would still be in compliance.

Okay. Thank you very much guys. Good luck.

There are no further questions. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

Thanks everyone for joining us today and have a great rest of the week. Thank you very much.

This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. And thank you for your participation.