Greetings and Welcome to Spire Global First Quarter 2022 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn to conference over to your host, Mr. Ben Hackman, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Hello everyone. And thanks for joining us on our first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Our results Press Release and SEC filings can be found on our IR website at ir.spire.com. A replay of today's call will also be made available. With me on the call today is Peter Platzer, CEO; and Tom Krywe, CFO. As a reminder, our commentary today will include non-GAAP items, reconciliations between our GAAP and non-GAAP results, as well as our guidance can be found in our earnings press release. Some of our comments today may contain Forward-Looking Statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. In particular, our expectations around integration of our acquisition results of operations and financial conditions are uncertain and subject to change. Should any of these fail to materialize or should our assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual company results could differ materially from those forward looking statements. A description of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions and other factors that could affect our financial results as included in our SEC filings. With that, let me hand the call over to Peter.

Thank you, Ben. Spire posted first quarter results that beat our Q1 guidance on the top and bottom-line. As market volatility, inflationary pressures and supply chain constraints continue to make headlines, Spire is bringing insights to help our customers drive stability and operational efficiencies during these dynamic times. Tracking of high value assets and locations and geolocating targets have demonstrated the power of space based data and insights, customers recognize that value of Spire data, and we have seen them expand across our data products and up the value chain. We look for continued growth as more use cases for Spire’s data become apparent. Now we will get into the details in a bit, but as a result of our Q1 performance, we are raising the low end of our full-year guidance range of AR, as our pipeline of new business opportunities continues to grow. We now see full-year ARR in the range of 101 million to 105 million. On the bottom line, we are continuing our relentless pursuit of profitability and our goal of being cash flow positive in 22-months to 28-months. Spire's first quarter results are reflection of the strong talent and immense effort put forth by everyone at the company. We are privileged to have a world-class team of professionals that redefine what is possible every day, with an air of humble, calm and collected confidence. We are continuing to push the limits of technology and enable solutions that benefit humanity. Our team of about 400 global employees stand proud as we watch our Lima Satellites being propelled into orbit from which they serve our customers with mission critical information day-in and stay-out. What was once thought impossible now seems like an everyday occurrence at Spire. Without the dedication, professionalism and creativity of our engineers, our sales…

Thanks, Peter. The first quarter was another outstanding quarter of execution that carried forward our momentum from the end of the last year. Q1 revenue increased 86% year-over-year to $18.1 million, which topped the high end of our guidance of $17.5 million and was driven by increased adoption of our solutions by existing customers and recent new customer additions. ARR at quarter end was $81.6 million up 134% year-over-year, which also exceeded the top end of our guidance and was driven by key wins in weather and space services. This resulted in adding $10.9 million of sequential quarter-over-quarter growth, a 15% increase. We ended the quarter on the upper end of our guidance range with 627 ARR solution customers a 271% increase year-over-year. Our organic Q1 ARR net retention rate and 12-month net retention rate were both a 106%. We continue to see overall growth from our existing customers as they expand across and up the value stack from clean data to smart data, to predictive analytics. We also see the dollar amount that existing customers are spending with us from buying multiple solutions increasing as they leverage our solution diversity and our ability to solve numerous use cases. Next, I will be discussing non-GAAP financial measures unless otherwise stated. We provided a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financials and our earnings release that should be reviewed in conjunction with the earnings call. Our operating loss for the first quarter was $12.8 million or negative 71% operating margin, which was $2 million better than our Q1 guidance range. This compares to negative 86% last quarter and negative 84% in the year ago quarter. The outperformance in the quarter was the result of strong revenue flowing through to margin and also lower headcount related spending. While we continue to make investments…

Thank you. At this time we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from line of Stefanos Crist with CJS Securities. Please proceed with your question.

HI thanks for taking my questions. On the six new satellites you launched, did all of those have the inter satellite link technology and can you maybe, update us on what percentage of the fleet has that currently equipped?

They did not all have the inter satellite links, and I actually don't have top of my head, how many of them did have it? They are our most modern and upgraded technologies and they served a pretty wide variety of use cases for customers. And we had the debris monitoring in orbit from Austrian Space Forum there. We had use cases for Spire replenishment data there. So it was a very, very, very set of satellites. But I don't know on top of my head on how many had inter satellite links, but we would be happy to get back to you with the exact number there.

Perfect. Thanks so much.

Your next question comes from line of Erik Rasmussen with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.

Yes. Thanks and congratulations on the results and execution in the first quarter. Maybe just my question on the better than expected non-gap op loss, how much of that two million was outperformance was from scale or stronger revenue versus the headcount spending? And maybe just on the inflationary concerns, what sort of headwinds are you expecting in this year and can you just sort of quantify that and how that is baked into the years? Thank you.

Yes, that is a great question. I will do the interest everything for the - I mean, the coverage on the revenue and how well we did? So we were $600,000 better than the guidance on the top end of our range on the revenue. That flowed right down to the margin side. So we got that gain from that out of the $2 million that we exceeded on the non-GAAP operating loss. The rest of it came from efficiencies that we had in the business and some headcount related expenses being less than expected. So we did really well on both fronts that the top-line and the bottom-line, both those avenues exceeded our guidance. And then as far as the rates and you know our current credit facility has interest rates that are fixed. So we are a solid on that front. And then as we look to expand or increase in our credit facility, you know we are going to look at interest rates, we are going to watch the market. We are looking at statistics over the course of time. We are going to build that all into our analysis and then make the proper decisions accordingly.

Great. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Ric Prentiss with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks good afternoon everybody. A couple of questions on my side. One is easy, Tom you mentioned obviously some potential FX headwinds out there, some within the second quarter, but also potential for the year. What is your kind of baseline assumption for FX rates from here that is baked into the guidance? And then the deeper one, probably for Peter, a lot of concerns about recession rearing its head globally, talk to us a little about how you are probably pun intended your business can weather recessions. Obviously, recurring revenue is good. But what are you hearing from your customer base or potential customer base on them wanting to sign up for new contracts given there could be a recessionary environment?

Yes, I will take the first one. Thanks. On the headwinds and the interest rates, we did build that into our guidance. So we actually are maintaining our revenue guidance for the full-year. And that is assuming also that built into that projections in our guidance. So despite having that and cause we do have a large amount of business that is outside the United States. We are maintaining our guidance for the revenue, and then we actually tightened our range for ARR dollars. So we moved up the low end of the range to 101 million to 105 million. So we are really confident in our ARR, as you can see from our results. We also had in the first quarter of $11 million, a sequential growth quarter-over-quarter, and the confidence and the results we had in Q1 and that lending itself to the guidance that we got for the full-year.

And Ric, to your other question, it certainly is a very, very dynamic situation on the global scale. What we have found though is that the stuff that we do for our customers is very, very core to them. I mean, we have seen this during the COVID period and we have seen this now, customers just really rely on us to run their business, and as such we have continued to see very, very high net retention rates, above a 100%. And then also when you look at what are some of those challenges that we see on a global scale. One of them is understanding the global supply chain where Spire has one of the most unique and insightful views that one can have through our ability to track all of trade on the oceans and all of trade in the air by tracking all the aircraft and ocean vessels. And I think that is potentially even a tailwind for us. And the other reason that we have concerned on a global scale, when you read the media is the geopolitical situation. And I think we have seen how commercial space companies can bring truth and transparency to such a geopolitical situation. And we have seen quite a bit of momentum from that area as well. I mean as you know we now own and operate one of the largest commercial RF Geolocation enabled fleets in the world with 40 satellites, RF Geolocation enabled on orbit right now. So as a Chinese say, may you live in interesting times, because there are always opportunities to be found. And the very diverse nature of Spire’s business affords us opportunities even in very dynamic and difficult global situations.

Great. that helps. Thanks guys. Operator before our next analyst question, I would like to ask a question from the Say Technologies platform. Last earnings call, Peter said it is harder to convey Spire services to the public since it is not a physical product like rocket lab or space mobile with a new head of Investor Relations, how much progress has been made to bring more public attention to Spire.

So, first of all, I really appreciate the great engagement that we have seen on the say platform. Thank you for your questions. It is like fascinating for us to know what you are concerned about, and I'm delighted to answer them. What we have done is we have deployed a two-pronged approach here. On one hand increasing resources that we bring to bear, and on the other hand increased the engagement that we have with the investment community. I hope you have seen that we were able to land a new and highly experienced Director of Investor Relation with Ben Hackman, and he has over 20-years of experience in the aerospace and defense industry. But on top of that, he was the number two in the Investor Relations department of Boeing. One of most celebrated Investor Relations department in the industry. But he also has experienced in financial analysis and forecasting, including in his role as a CFO. So in short, he really understands the industry, the numbers and the value proposition of Spire. On the engagement side to give you a few stats there. We had three initiations this year already, all of which were by ratings. We presented at six conferences and have three scheduled just in the next two months. And we participated in five non-deal road shows, and we had at least 30 investor conversations already. So quite an active calendar, the good news is that I really enjoy those conversations. And so we look forward to keeping that pace up and actually indeed increasing that pace off engagement and bringing additional resources to bear.

Our next question comes from Jeff Meuler with Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, thank you. It is [Stephen] (Ph) on for Jeff. I guess my first question was as you move up sort of the data value stack from clean data to predictive solutions, what percentage or mix of your customers are currently at some of those higher level offerings and then how quickly, I guess, are you seeing customers adopt once they have the initial purchase?

So, because it is a subscription, we really have this low friction pathway for customers to increase the types of services that they procure from us to help them solve further business problems. And that, of course, then results in a retention rate that is quite attractive at substantially over a 100%. So we see an increasing number of customers take advantage of that. And we see that as one of the growth path for Spire over many years to come to offer additional solutions up that value chain to our customers.

And we have seen the improvement, obviously in the first quarter with our net retention rate increasing from 104% to 106%. And as we had said previous calls the back half of the year, we really spent on adding new logos and new ARR customers. And now we are starting to see the benefits of having those to now do the expand part of the line expand. And as Peter mentioned, we have four solutions so that we can cross sell we are in so many industries. We could sell both the government commercial and all these different avenues. We have the chance to go sideways and then also up the stack. So really great opportunity for us to keep driving that net retention rate up as we are landing the customer, because we give them so many different options and new cases that we can solve.

Great. And then let me just expand on an earlier question. The additional on orbit services you referenced as part of the January launch, just help us understand sort of what those additional capabilities are? And then sort of how quickly, I guess that -- how many more satellite necessary in order for the conation to be able to leverage those new capabilities?

So there are capabilities which we have developed on almost weekly basis and upload to our satellites through software upgrades, Jeff, as you know, the RF Geolocation, being a classic example of that. Other capabilities that are immediately available to customers upon launch and have been on numerous spacecraft is the computing at the edge, which brings AI and machine learning capabilities on a supercomputer type level to on orbit data collection and analysis. Something that we have rolled out both internally for Spire, but also for our customers. And then geolocation - sorry, the RFG into satellite links, they provide benefit not just on a full consolation basis, but also as we give customers access to it on small clusters, where they then can do things like geolocation using a small cluster based on the RF Geolocation. And the exceptional knowledge that Spire satellites have about the time on orbit, their location on orbit and their relative speed on orbit, which is an outcome of our particular data products, where we had to develop exceptional knowledge and precise orbit determination, all of which now flows into the products that we offer to customers. So those capabilities by and large are available at launch immediately and then increase in value over time.

Great. Thanks.

Your next question comes from Elizabeth Grenfell with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Hi good evening. I had a couple of questions for you. The first one is if we look at the revenue growth for the quarter, how much of it came from Exact Earth and how much was contributed from the legacy business?

So we don't break out in a maritime business, because we simply can't think of it this way. You take a picture of water from Lake of Michigan and you take a picture of water from the Lake Ontario. Once you mix them, and use them to water your plants. It is very, very hard to know which water is increasing the growth of your plant. The teams are fully integrate - operating as one team side by side without any distinction. And so it really is revenue from the maritime business that flows into that full revenue picture without any separation of does it come out of the lake of Ontario or does it come out of the lake of Michigan?

Okay. So can you, can you break out for us what percentage of the revenue came from the maritime business?

We don't separate our business out by maritime or aviation or space services, as because it is all from one shared infrastructure. And so that leverage that sits on that infrastructure really makes it impossible and actually not very helpful to understand how our business operates, and it doesn't reflect the cross selling that also happens as customers use multiple solutions from us using that one integrated infrastructure.

Yes, because we will embed the pricing when we are doing the multi solutions into one price, and one fee and it just gets mingled together. So it is unable to be broken out. The one thing too to note though on the revenue is that we did exceed the guidance for the first quarter. So as a combined force, we put the guidance force as a combined company, and then we exceeded that guidance at the top end of the range.

Okay. And then what exactly do you think you will need to raise additional capital? I mean, I know you have mentioned in the last quarter couple quarterly calls that you are looking at options, but I mean, when specifically are you thinking about it and what kind of order of magnitude are you thinking about?

Yes. As I mentioned, we are looking in all these different options, we are weighing out how the interest rates are bearing. We will, we have our current situation. So we do have $92 million of cash and cash equivalents. So, you know, we like where the balance sheet is right now. And we are looking at it to augment and make it even better than it is today with looking at these options. So we are continually evaluating, we are watching things carefully and obviously when we are ready to post the information we will do so.

And do you think it will be within a year? I mean, if you've burned through what 20 million in cash this quarter, is it fair to think that within the year that should happen?

I mean, Elizabeth, we feel very comfortable with the balance sheet to drive the guidance that we have given. We feel very comfortable with the stake in the ground that we have made in terms of turning cash flow positive within 22-months to 28-months, which means that we will turn adjusted EBITDA positive and an operating margin positive before that as it flows through the waterfall. And we evaluate situation as if and when something makes sense. But I think the momentum that we have carried from the fourth quarter of last year through this first quarter this year, beating our top-line, raising our ARR guidance on the top end. We feel actually quite good about the progression and execution of the business and the support that we have from our balance sheet to continue on that pathway.

Yes and especially with having the less of a loss in the first quarter, and then improving the guidance for the full-year on our non-GAAP operating loss guidance. We are actually spending less than, than originally even targeted.

Okay. And then the final question I have is, what's the landscape looking like for you in terms of hiring? Is it - I mean, do you think it is been tougher than you expected and is that potentially why the headcount expenses were a tailwind to the quarter? Is it just because the hiring environment is so difficult or what was the driver behind that?

You know certainly, there is evidence of a very tight labor market, but Spire benefits from being a mission driven company in a highly attractive industry, the new space sector and as such, we were fortunate of having one of our most successful hiring quarters in the history of Spire. We do constantly look for efficiencies and scaled in the business, and we certainly see that and benefit from that. And we have been able to pick up a few things here and there extra than what we originally planned, which led to improvements not just on the top-line, but also on the bottom-line, but absolutely it is a bit. I mean, it is a very tight labor market, but at Spire, we get to work on mission critical products for our customers that drive to it is a more sustainable and equitable future. And we nearing the hurricane and wildfire season, and we expect that the world will again turn more and more to like the impact of climate change and look even more dynamically for data and solutions that help companies and governments alike manage that impact of climate change. Now that is a very attractive area to be spending your time on. Our data and solutions for tackling global supply chain or the geopolitical hotspots, they are topical and on a global scale. And that's really helpful for us in attracting the best talent from a global pool. Even in a very, very tight labor market that absolutely exists when we are a mission driven company that offers people to work with data from space and AI and machine learning data analysis on data from space in a truly global organization. And I think that afford us some advantages.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Of course.

Your next question comes from Scott Deuschle with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good evening thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the momentum. Peter, I appreciate your comments on the prior question about how difficult it is to segment the business from a revenue standpoint. But I guess, can you even just roughly comment or give us a sense for how big this space services business is as a percentage of ARR? And I'm only really asking because it does seem to be a fairly different flavor of revenue with different kind of unit economics and marginal cost dynamics. So I would love to get a sense for how big that is the overall business at this point?

So we certainly are excited about this type of business. It allows us to leverage one of the largest scale operations in the industry Spire with 350-years of space heritage, a 150 satellites launched, tens of thousands of contacts a month between our satellites and ground stations, terabytes of data process shipped to hundreds of customers, and making it as easy as accessing an API for companies to leverage space to solve their problems. It is a very, very large TAM. And if you look at TAM analysis that we have done a little while ago, you see that it is a very, very meaningful portion of our TAM. And just as Amazon, AWS is a very meaningful portion of especially the profitability and the cash flow production for Amazon. We really like this business. Unfortunately at this point in time, we can't really break it out, because it is a shared infrastructure. So we are not yet at like that massive scale, which will allow us to easily break out. Because it is maybe like a little bit more dedicated infrastructure. It is shared across customers. So we don't really have a good number that we can share at this point in time.

Okay. I mean, I appreciate its shared infrastructure, but aren't these distinct contracts. NorthStar contracts -.

We do have existing contracts, as like a large number of them. They are subscription based contracts. But when you want to talk about a separate business, you don't want to talk about it just from one side of your income statement. You want to have a sense of the full side of it, right. And we can't do this easily, because it is the shared infrastructure that cross virtualizes the various solutions here. So at this point unfortunately I can't really give you anything a much additional, but I'm happy to continue your conversation. See if there is may be other ways of answering what you are truly trying to understand here. It is a highly profitable, high growth business just as our other businesses. It is a subscription business, just like our other businesses that is focused on delivering our customer's data, just like our other businesses. So there is some differences to it, but there might be substantially less than one would think, especially from a business perspective. And maybe it is worthwhile spending some extra time from us to explain that even in more detail.

Okay. That is helpful. And then Tom, I think the incremental gross margins were hopefully my math right 22% on a year-over-year basis. I know you had a full quarter of exact earth that probably drove a lot of that dilution, but was there anything else at play in the quarter that drove that, that we should be aware of? Then any comments you can make about incremental gross margins through the remainder of the year?

Yes. And you are exactly right. There are quite a few metrics and numbers that we have got now kind of setting a new baseline with having Exact Earth. So it was a full quarter of having them on board. In the gross margins, they have a little - they had a different dynamic of their business. They had a much higher cost of revenue, but a significantly lower OPEX as a percentage of revenue. So organic Spire was kind of different opposite in that regards. And that was one of the reasons why we said we weren't going to give guidance in the gross margin, gross profit area, but to really focus on the non-GAAP operating loss, because then it balanced those two things out with a different dynamic of the business. And again, we did really well. On that front with exceeding our guidance, the two million on the first quarter and then actually improving the guidance in the full-year on the non-GAAP operating loss. But to answer your question, though, I would say this is starting like a new baseline with having them on board. We do expect just like we did before that those numbers will improve over time because we have that leverage infrastructure that still exists and we are still going to have certain parts of the cost structure that are very maintained and stable, while the revenue keeps increasing. So, it did drop because of the acquisition and having the new profile, but we do expect the same thing to happen as we were doing organically, which was growing it over the course of time with the leverage infrastructure.

Got it. So as we go to Q2 and Q3, if - on a sequential incremental gross margin - that is mouthful, sequential incremental gross margin basis we should be looking back into like the 60% plus range (Multiple Speakers)?

We do expect it to be increasing as we go through time, but this is setting a new baseline for us. It is a new point in time and now we have to kind of move ourselves forward from that having that different dynamic. But in the same token, if you look at our operating expenses, a percentage of revenue, we saw the lowest levels we ever had in years. And that was mainly due to their dynamic was different, getting all that revenue without the operating expenses as much as we had it organically before.

Right that was impressive. Alright thanks guys. I appreciate it. I will leave it there.

Your final question comes from Josh Sullivan with the Benchmark Company. Please proceed with your question.

Good evening. Can you make some comments just on third-party costs, launch, insurance how are those trending? Is that layer of the stack matures are costs coming down or inflationary headwinds masking that.

You know on the launch side, you saw that we were able to switch from one launch provider, which had - bit of difficulties to a new launch provider and go from first call to integration of our satellites in 21-days. So we definitely see an increase in launch providers that are helping us solve our customer’s problems with greater reliability and more attractive cost. So overall, I would say generally when you have increasing supply that is a deflationary pressure in those markets. So net-net, we are not seeing a huge thing here from an inflationary perspective from third-party providers. There is also like the balance of some of those providers being, not in us dollars. And so then you get a benefit from that as well from like from the FX exchange rate. So it has not been actually a big story for us to be honest.

And then just broadly speaking on the sales cycle, one of my favorite topics, any changes with the macro uncertainties you guys are educating your customers and they are getting faster, but any noticeable change with the macro uncertainties?

So when the world gets more uncertain, people are looking for things that are reliable and they can lean on. And that is exactly the strength of Spire. We run a massive scale operation, proven with experience for many years serving some of the world's most demanding customers. And so it is a little bit like when in doubt by IBM and in more-and-more instances, Spire is the IBM solution here that is tried, proven, operational at scale that customers can and are trusting. So I think that is probably how we experience it mostly right now.

And add to that on the time, we are actually seeing some customers shorten and our sales cycles actually shorten in the near-term. And that is because with these tough times, our use cases solve problems for them. When say like for example, petrol or gas prices are going up, we give them solutions for better tracking for whether that is their airplane, their vessel wrapping weather around it, that has a much more accurate forecast they are able to then to lower their cost structure. So they are coming to us actually during these times sometimes faster, and then asking to close the sales cycle quicker, because of the use cases that we are solving for them since they are facing some inflation issues and cost increases. And then we can actually negate that through our solutions.

Got it. okay, thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And I would like to turn a call back to Mr. Peter Platzer for closing comments.

Really appreciate the questions and engagement. I mean, in closing, we are immensely positive about the momentum we see in the business as showcased by our results in the first quarter exceeding our guidance, both on the top line and the bottom line. And we recognize the fortunate position we occupy at this very crest of a massive transformational wave of leveraging space to solve problems on earth be their climate change or geopolitical tensions. We off to very good start for the year, and team and I are really encouraged by this progress. We continue to make against our four core growth pillars. We execute with a typical sense of urgency and relentlessly drive to its profitable growth. Leveraging our cutting edge technology and innovation, we really endeavor to help our customers and humanity solve truly global challenges and strive for a more sustainable and equitable future. And with that, thank you for listening.

This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you all for your participation.