Thank you for standing by and welcome to the Sonoco First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the call over to Roger Schrum, Interim Head of Investor Relations and Communications. You may begin.

Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Yesterday evening, we issued a news release and posted an investor presentation that reviews Sonoco's 2025 first quarter financial results. Both are posted on our Investor Relations section of our website at sonoco.com. A replay of today's conference call will be available on our website and we'll post a transcript later this week. If you would turn to Slide 2, I would remind you that during today's call, we will discuss a number of forward-looking statements based on current expectations, estimates, and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Therefore, actual results may differ materially. Additionally, today's presentation includes the use of non-GAAP financial measures, which management believes provides useful information to investors about the company's financial condition and results of operations. Further information about the company's use of non-GAAP financial measures, including definitions as well as reconciliations to GAAP measures, is also available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Finally, references to certain financial metrics along with corresponding year-over-year comparable results made on this call are on a full company basis except when specifically referred to for continuing operations or for discontinued operations. Joining me on this call today is Howard Coker, President and CEO; Rodger Fuller, Chief Operating Officer; and Jerry Cheatham, Interim Chief Financial Officer. For today's call, we have prepared remarks followed by a Q&A. If you'll now turn to Slide 4 in our presentation, I'll now turn the call over to Howard.

Thank you, Roger, and good morning, everyone. Let me start. Our first quarter results demonstrated the strength of the new Sonoco as our global team achieved record top-line and adjusted EBITDA performance. Slide 5 shows net sales were 31% or grew 31% and adjusted EBITDA was up 38%, while adjusted earnings were up 23%, despite higher-than-expected interest expenses, taxes, and the negative impact from currency translation. I'll let Jerry go through the key drivers for the quarter, but overall, we are pleased with the improvement in both our consumer packaging and industrial packaging segments. The 127% growth in adjusted EBITDA in the consumer segment reflects a full quarter of the Eviosys acquisition, along with strong volume mix from our legacy metal and rigid paper can businesses and a positive price-cost environment. The industrial segment generated a 6% improvement in adjusted EBITDA stemming from a year-over-year improvement in price cost and productivity. Volume was down low single digits in the quarter, and flat results in South America was offset by results in the rest of our served markets. As shown on Slide 6, we completed the sale of the thermoform and flexible TOPPAN Holdings on time and as expected. We received approximately $1.8 billion in cash for the business, which generated approximately $1.56 billion in after-tax proceeds, which we used to significantly reduce debt and strengthen our balance sheet. We do extend our best wishes for continued success to our approximately 4,500 former TFP teammates and their new TOPPAN team. On April 1, we completed the first phase of the integration of Eviosys by rebranding the business the Sonoco Metal Packaging EMEA. As shown on Slide 7, we're changing our digital imagery as well as physical signage, trucks. Overall, while early, it's been a real nice start to the integration. We're…

Thanks, Howard. I'm pleased to present the first quarter financial results, starting on Page 9 of the presentation. Please note that all results on an adjusted basis and all growth metrics on a year-over-year basis unless otherwise stated. The GAAP to non-GAAP EPS reconciliation is in the appendix of this presentation as well as in the press release. As Howard mentioned, on April 1, 2025, we finalized the sale of our thermal formed and flexible packaging business, marking a significant milestone in advancing our fewer bigger businesses strategy. This divestiture strengthens our focus on core sustainable packaging platforms and positions us to reinvest in higher return opportunities that drive long-term earnings growth and margin expansion. Looking ahead, our leadership in two core markets will enable us to operate more efficiently and serve our customers with greater focus and agility. Adjusted EPS was $1.38. Earnings per share increased 23% year-over-year, mainly driven by continued strong productivity of $17 million and favorable price cost performance across our core businesses. These gains were partially offset by unfavorable volume mix, other non-recurring items, and currency translation. First quarter net sales increased 31% to $1.7 billion, excluding discontinued operations of $321 million. This change was driven by favorable price and the impact of the full quarter of S&P EMEA's sales. Adjusted EBITDA of $338 million was up by an outstanding 38%, and adjusted EBITDA margin improved 170 basis points to 16.6%. This was driven by positive price cost, sustained favorable productivity, and the impact of acquisitions, and partially offset by volume softness in the industrial segment and the impact of currency translation. Page 10 has our consumer segment results on continuing operations basis. Consumer sales were up 83% due to the S&P EMEA acquisition and favorable volume mix. Global rigid paper containers sales increased marginally…

Thanks, Jerry. One of the things we don't talk enough about due to our quarterly results is the unbelievable work and dedication our team is putting in the transformation of the new Sonoco into a simpler, stronger, and more sustainable company. In the past quarter, our team successfully completed a complex carve-out divestiture of the TFP business. In addition, our 6,500 new teammates with Sonoco Metal Packaging and EMEA are quickly working to integrate the business and drive expected synergy. As we show on Slide 15, since we began this journey five years ago, we have reduced the number of divisions in our portfolio from 18, down to three for consumer and industrial businesses while creating an enterprise that is positioned for future growth. As we show on Slide 16, Sonoco was recently recognized by Newsweek as one of the most trustworthy and respected companies in the United States. In addition, just last week on Earth Day, USA TODAY named Sonoco one of America's climate leaders for 2025 in recognition of our efforts over the past several years to reduce carbon emissions from our operations. These honors belong to our employees who work every day to make life better for our customers, our communities, and shareholders. We've been asked a lot recently about tariffs and how Sonoco may perform during periods of economic stress. Let me make a couple of observations. First, Sonoco's consumer packaging business tends to perform well during periods of economic stress as consumers typically shift to center-of-the-store packaged food. While our industrial paper packaging business has experienced some slowing during past recessions, I would point out that our industrial business in 2025 is significantly stronger and the markets we serve have matured since the COVID recession of 2020. Now, does that mean that Sonoco's immune to…

I guess the first question I would have, if you could just give us a bit more color on the volume performance by region, by key segment or product line, I know you touched on a lot of it, Howard, during your remarks, but if you could just give us sort of a quick review, North America versus Europe versus the rest of the world, if you care, to talk to that, rigid paper, metal, and industrial on an organic, if you have that, that'd be great. And then a couple of other questions.

Sure, George. Volume, let's start with the consumer side, felt really positive in total, but to drill into that, and we're talking mid-single digits over the consumer on a global basis. But when you drill into that, what we're seeing is rigid paper North America was actually slightly up, and South America, the same. South America was actually really strong. You go over to Europe and we were down, and similarly, which is for the first time in a long time, we saw that our Southeast Asia rigid paper volumes were down. Europe and Southeast Asia, and to some extent in North America, one discrete customer, very large customers going through a transition at this point in time, and we've seen some pullback. We don't see that as being nothing more than a timing issue, and particularly in Europe and South America, and benefit, not South America, Southeast Asia, and benefit as things clear up there. On the industrial side, really a lot of red, but low single digits, like North America would suggest, again, low single digits. The real issue call out there would be Europe. Europe was softer than we expected, but if you take South America, which is basically slightly down in U.S., we're pretty much holding our own on the industrial side as well. So, that's kind of the big picture. And you said, asked about metal. So, metal in North America, as I said, we said 10%, but let me unpack that a bit. Our aerosol business was up roughly 25% quarter over quarter. Our food can business was probably 10-plus%, but what's embedded in there is our intercompany sales related to components. So, loose ends, et cetera. Again, we have one discrete customer that has pulled back on their volumes that we expect to see return in the relatively near future. So, if you're really talking about canned bodies, you're up probably in that 15% type range in total between aerosol and food. And Europe, while we are very pleased with how things have started and improvement year over year in terms of profitability of the business, a little slower than our expectations, and I'd say right on mid single digits down to our expectations. We see that as a bit of a timing issue as it's typically a softer first quarter and as you're well aware, a ramp up through second and third.

Okay, Howard. And just, you're pleased with Europe, but it's down mid single digits in metal so far, correct?

Say that again?

Europe, you're pleased, but it's down mid single digits in metal, correct?

Yes. Profitability was up, EBITDA was up about 25% year over year.

Two quick ones and I'll turn it over. One, are you seeing any changes in purchasing behavior, any changes in supply chain, anything to call out on customer promotional activity given tariffs, given the macro? And that's sort of a big question. You don't have to go through everything, but if there's anything in particular we as analysts should know about relative to how we're modeling you going forward, that's kind of what's behind that question. And then you talk about messaging and trying to, this is my wording, not yours, get the story out to a larger degree on Sonoco. It's neither here nor there, but what do you think needs to be better understood by the market relative to the discount you see in the stock versus where you think it should be? Thanks, and I'll turn it over.

Sure. What we're seeing changes, supply chain, customers, et cetera, really not a lot. I think when we'll start feeling it is when we start seeing what I would suspect would be increased pull-through from our consumer customers, which historically our consumer businesses have performed very well, but not a lot. What I would suggest that unique to Sonoco is that we do have our largest paper can customer in the midst of an acquisition. And so to your point about marketing, et cetera, we've seen decreases there as they anticipate the turnover of that business. So a little stagnation in the last quarter or so with that customer, and we have very, very strong opinions about where the new owner can take this business. So we'll see how that manifests itself post-closed mid-year. And the message is really more about as we're ending this whole transition, as you guys know, as you know, the numbers, it's tough to follow what's all going on and to be able to start reaching a point of, I wouldn't ever say finished state, but certainly on the trajectory we've been over literally the last five years, start being able to connect the significantly improved performance the company's seen over the last couple of years and the inverse relationship to our stock and start telling the story on where we are, where we're landing, where we're going. And I think even starting today, it should be a little more clear, a lot more clear than would have been in earlier periods. So that is just it. Just getting the message out about who we are, where we're going, what the opportunities look like. And it's a pretty exciting go forward story for the company.

Your next question comes from a line of Michael Roxland from Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Thank you, Howard, Jerry, Roger for taking my questions and congrats on all the progress. Can you help us? You mentioned managing your global network. Can you give us a sense of where there are opportunities and some of the things that you're considering doing around your global network?

Yeah, Michael, this is Rodger. I think that's specifically talking about our metal in, our metal can business, our metal in supply. And Howard's already mentioned how that's integrated into our paper can business. With significant added operations in Europe, with a lot of the strategic supply being provided out of Europe, we're looking across the platform, our European platform, our Asia and U.S., and deciding where is the best location primarily to produce easy open ends, non-easy open ends, components for all of our businesses, all of our consumer businesses now, our can businesses. And making those decisions over the next couple of years, strategically, where can we provide the lowest cost solution to our operations and to our customers, and working through that as we speak. So, that's really, in my opinion, outside of the tremendous synergy opportunity, which we can talk about later, that we have just combining our two metal businesses. So, again, it's looking at this global platform we have now and making those longer-term decisions on where is the low-cost opportunities. How do we use that to gain market share, to grow our business, which is the ultimate objective of looking at that global platform.

Yeah, Michael, let me add one other. If you look at our global rigid paper container business, this is how we operate. We operate under one single umbrella globally. And the benefit, and we started that probably 10, 12, 15 years in March, and be able to take the best of the best of each market in terms of technology, R&D, innovation, and have that centralized where there's not cross-border challenges or competition, but being able to create the best of the global in terms of those categories. And it's worked well for us on the paper can side, and you'll see us over time with that same type structure. And so, again, taking the best of one region and the best of the other region and creating something that no one else has been able to do.

On Eviosys transitioning, I think I heard you say that EBITDA was up 23% year over year in 1Q. I think you reiterated the guide for EBITDA to be 10%. Is that just conservatism, or is that some concerns over your tariff and economic uncertainty? Like, why reiterate the more modest guide relative to what strong 1Q performance?

I just think it's conservative and comps, so no doubt about it. Last year was a weaker quarter, stronger quarter this year, being conservative as we go forward.

Nothing operationally stands out, though. It's just work. Is it just...

No, it's just work.

And last question before turning it over, just in terms of the Eviosys integration, last quarter you mentioned having a very strong leadership team there. What has the company done to ensure that the team is retained and there's not turnover in the near term that could cause disruption and negatively impact results?

Yeah, Michael, it's Rodger. Let me just talk a little bit about the integration, and maybe this gets out in front of a couple of questions, but I know it's on people's mind. But you're right, we're pleased with the integration, very impressed with the capabilities and talents of the new team and seeing nice progress on the integration across the board. I think, number one, it's spending time with the leadership team and the critical people in the business across the board, from our customers, from the market standpoint. And our people are very pleased to see a strategic buyer coming, stepping in and taking a leadership position in the bootcamp market in Europe. So, in general, the team is very pleased to be part of Sonoco, and they understand the vision, they understand what we're trying to do with the global business, and they want to deliver the results that we're looking at. So, typically, as you go through these, I think you know there are retention-type discussions that we have around timing, around packages, around the business. That's all going extremely well. The leadership team has tremendous experience in the metal can market. They want to continue with the business. So, it's really just that constant communication, and really the culture of Sonoco is making people feel involved with the business, making people feel part of something bigger. And again, I can tell you across the board, we feel comfortable that the critical people that we need in the business will continue to stay with us. Let me go ahead and talk about synergies, because I know it'll come up from a cost synergy standpoint. Howard's already mentioned we're upping our run rate this year to the $40 million level by the end of the year, becoming…

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Weintraub from Seaport Research Partners. Your line is open.

So appreciate that you've upped the target on synergies by $10 million. At the same time, you've talked about the volume environment being weaker. I think you had originally come into the year thinking like a 2% to 3% type of growth in consumer packaging was viable. Correct me if I'm wrong there, but what would your updated view be? And then presumably, that delta would be more than a $10 million negative delta. So I'm curious, what are some of the other explicit drivers you think are going to help offset that in keeping the guidance where it had been?

Yeah, Mark, when you say consumer, we're actually all looking at an increase in terms of volumes as we head into the upcoming quarters. So really, you just kind of look at the first quarter, particularly in this business, which does have seasonality. So as we're looking out, we're seeing that much stronger second quarter, third quarter rates really across both the paper can as well as the global metal can businesses. So we're not really factoring saying, hey, there was a 7% down in the first quarter. That translates for the year. That'll work. Our expectations are that'll work itself out through the course of the year.

Sorry, just to clarify, so you're still kind of embedding a 2% to 3% volume increase for the year, which I think is what you had been talking about three months ago?

Yes. That's correct.

And then second, any update on ThermoSafe and where your thought process there might be?

Yeah, well, first off, very pleased with the continued solid performance from the team. Really not a formal update. I'll say that we're preparing ourselves and we will make a decision on when to go, on frankly what it's going to turn out to be, what is the macro situation like at that time. But officially right now, I'd say we're still looking at by the end of the year coming to a resolution on that. But again, happy with the trajectory of the business and we'll see how that unfolds through the course of the year.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from a line of Matt Roberts from Raymond James. Your line is open.

Quick question, on leverage, post the TFP pay down on April 3rd, where does your net adjusted debt stand? I know you said it was less than 4x, but what would that have been at the end of 1Q and recognizing there is some seasonality with a larger metal business, where do you expect that leverage to be by year-end '25?

Yeah, this is Jerry. As we stated, we expect it to be by the end of this year under 4x and we're still on track to reach our target of 3x to 3.3x by the end of 2026.

And secondly, on the price cost expectations, could you say where your OCC cost expectation now is versus where you had it in January and what kind of market conditions inform that? And we're hearing some constructive commentary around the URB list price increase, although it's not yet reflected in the index. Does the guide assume any incremental benefit there? If so, how much? Usually it's not reflected unless passed through, but just curious your thoughts or any color you have there. Thank you again.

Yeah, what we assumed in our original guide was an average OCC of around $100. Obviously, it was around $80, $85 in the first quarter. We expect it to be that similar in the second, and we're expecting it to average somewhere between $90 and $95 in the second half of the year.

And on the URB price?

Yeah, on the URB price, it's been, you're right, pretty unique against all paper grades. We're running in probably 92% to 93% utilization rates right now. We're seeing strong yield on the, against the $70 increase in the market, so would be extremely disappointed if the appropriate indices did not pick that up at their next go-round.

Your next question comes from a line of Gabe Hodge from Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

I had a question, maybe a point of clarification. I apologize. It's a busy morning. Did you talk about consumer volumes in aggregate on an organic basis, question number one? And question number two, Howard, you threw out a bunch of numbers for the metal food business, and so maybe if we could break it down, North America versus Europe and organic. You talked about some pretty big numbers. I think double-digit growth in the North American metal business. It's quite a bit better than what we saw for the industry data, maybe suggesting you guys are winning some business there. Can you talk about that? And would it be your view that customers are trying to buy ahead of any potential price increases in material costs? And again, I apologize if you covered that.

Yeah, no problem, Gabe. We're looking at consumer from an organic perspective about 4% up for the first quarter in total. That's excluding acquisition. On the metal side of the business, in terms of breaking down further, North America, that kind of details less so on Europe, but North America, we saw about 10% improvement in food and about a 25%. And keep in mind, about a third of our business is aerosol. Aerosol has recovered nicely, up about 25%. And then what I also noted was that when you look at units, and we've got some work to do in terms of how we report this stuff, that we've got metal ends that go to a select customer legacy to another customer. There's been some drawdowns that we expect that will recover. So that's what brought the total. The math doesn't work. If 10% of your food can's up, 25% of your aerosol, but you're 10% up in total, it's because of low value metal ends are calculated in that number. We'll work on that going forward. Europe, really, it's one discrete market, a seasonal market that hasn't kicked in the 6%, 7%. It's the fish market, and it normally doesn't really start taking off till now or through up until early June or so. So we're expecting to see that turn in the very near future. Other than that, most of the other markets were exactly where we expected them to be. I'm not sure if you have other commentary to it. Nope, that's right. So in terms of pre-buy, no, not seeing any activity there. I mean, it could be an isolated case, but no, as we talk to our customers going in, as we're rolling into the second quarter, it's very encouraging in terms of what the volume profile looks like, particularly here in North America, but it's not pulled forward.

Okay. So to be clear, I guess, adjusting for the end sales, which seems like it should balance out over the course of the year, you would expect pretty darn strong volumes in aerosol and food cans also to be up for the full year in North America.

Correct.

And then a point of clarification, I think, Jerry, you mentioned embedded in the guidance, you talked about getting early realization on the URB price increase, but you'd expect that to flow through in the back half of the year. A, is that in fact what you said? And B, quantification of what that benefit would look like in the second half?

Yeah. Let me answer that kind of in a two-part way. The increase is going well in the marketplace, but you've got to realize that about 80% of the business is really tied to contracts, and some of those contracts reset based off the timing of when the TAM Bidding Chip moved, which is what the majority of those contracted customers are on. So that's why we expect the benefit to mostly occur in the second half of the year, just depending on the timing of when the TAM Bidding Chip index moves. It has not reflected the open market increase as we speak today, but we do expect that to happen in the coming month or two. In terms of the impact, as we previously stated, tough to say how much the TAM Bidding Chip index will move, but what I would say is that with each $10 move in that index typically represents about an incremental $6 billion a year on an annualized basis of revenue.

And that concludes our question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Roger Shrum for closing remarks.

Certainly, appreciate everybody participating in today's call. I know you've had a very busy day. If you've got follow-up questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at your convenience. You can disconnect now.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.