Stefan Chkautovich
Analyst · Stephens. Your line is now open. Please go ahead
Thanks, Greg. Matt hit some of the key financial items already, but I'll note a few additional details. Looking at this quarter's net interest margin of 3.36%, it included about 9 basis points of fair value discount accretion on acquired loan portfolios and premium amortization on assumed deposits which was static compared to the linked September quarter but down from the prior-year December quarter addition of 14 basis points. Although this can vary based on prepayment activity, we would expect this to trend lower by about a basis point a quarter. The primary contributor to the 1 basis point compression of the net interest margin as compared to the linked quarter was the increase in lower-yielding assets as the average balance of the investment portfolio and interest earning cash equivalents increased by almost $80 million quarter-over-quarter. This was mostly offset by an 11 basis point decrease in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 3.33%. Looking at March quarter, through January, we have continued to see increases in seasonal deposits, which have further elevated our cash equivalent balances, which are primarily being held at the Federal Reserve. This, in addition to seasonally slower quarter for loan growth, could compress the net interest margin. But we would expect the net interest spread, which is the difference between our earning asset yield and cost of interest-bearing liabilities, to improve slightly as loans reprice higher at renewal and CDs continue to reprice down. In addition, the reduced day count in the March quarter will have a small negative impact on the quarterly net interest income. Non-interest income was down 4.3% compared to the linked quarter due to reduced gain on sale of loans, primarily SBA, a decrease in interchange income as the September quarter's results included receipt of additional card network fees based on annual volume incentives and as we saw a decrease in interchange per transaction, and lower other loan fees. Non-interest expense was down 3.7% quarter-over-quarter, primarily due to lower compensation and legal professional fees. The lower compensation expense in the December quarter is primarily due to the timing of accruals. Legal and professional expenses have decreased due to the one-time payment in the September quarter associated with the performance improvement initiative of $840,000. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in other non-interest expense due to expenses associated with SBA loans and cost for employee travel and training. We would expect to see a quarterly increase in the compensation expense run rate in the March quarter as annual merit increases and cost-of-living adjustments take effect, for which we awarded mid-single-digit percentage increase, including the cost of benefits. Our provision for credit losses was $932,000 in the quarter, as compared to $2.2 million in the linked quarter. The September quarter provision was elevated to support strong loan growth and an increase in credit reserves for individually reviewed loans. Our allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2024 was $55 million or 1.36% of gross loans and 659% of non-performing loans, as compared to an ACL of $54 million or 1.37% of gross loans and 663% of non-performing loans at September 30, 2024 the linked quarter. The current period PCL was the result of $501,000 provision attributable to the ACL for loan balances outstanding and $431,000 provision attributable to the allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposures. Our assessment of the economic outlook was little changed. Our nonowner-occupied CRE concentration at the bank level was approximately 317% of Tier 1 capital and allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2024, down about 3 percentage points as compared to September 30, due to growth in our Tier 1 capital outpacing our nonowner-occupied CRE. On a consolidated basis, our CRE ratio was 306% at December 31. Our intent would be to hold relatively steady on this measure and grow our CRE in-line with capital, but we expect it may pick up somewhat in the next few quarters with construction draws. The effective tax rate was 23.7% in the quarter, as compared to 21.3% in the linked quarter and 20.6% in the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2025 was elevated due to an adjustment of tax accruals of $380,000 attributable to completed merger activity. We would expect the effective tax rate to return to our normal range in the second half of the fiscal year. To conclude, the first half of the fiscal year 2025 has been a strong one, characterized by robust loan growth and improved profitability. With a healthy loan pipeline and favorable underlying trends, we are optimistic about the remainder of the year. Greg, any closing thoughts?