Javan D. Ottoson - Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Analyst · Joe Allman from JPMorgan
Thank you, Tony, and good morning everyone. I will now provide a brief overview of some of the significant operational activity occurring in the company and make a few comments about our capital plans for the remainder of the year and our financial guidance. In the Woodford shale, we continue to see positive results in the play. Our operational results are improving and we believe we are doing a better job on drilling these wells than a number of other operators. The average EUR for the last 10 wells for which we have meaningful data is between 2.7 and 3 BCFE, and on the cost front we build and completed our last free wells for between $4 million to $4.4 million per well. These wells had long lateral and utilized the multistage fracture stimulations that are common through out the play. We disclosed during the first quarter that we were increasing our capital investment in Woodford shale by $20 million for the year which allows us to operate two rigs in a play for the remainder of the year, and have the third rig in a play for parts of the year. This was consistent with the plan we laid out and that we said we would accelerate activity based on success. We will continue to look at our result and may accelerate further in the second half if we can do so efficiently. News out of the ArkLaTex region gets more exciting all the time with announcements on new plays and good well results from a number of operators. We are very happy about the result we're seeing on our own Cotton Valley program in the region. Our first operated horizontal well Boise Southern 1-H averaged $4 million a day for the month of April with essentially no decline. We are drilling a second horizontal well in the area that targets the Taylor Sand in the Cotton Valley, and we will be completing and in the next couple of weeks. These two wells were drilled on acreage that we already had in the Carthage area, and we plan to drill our first well on the acreage we acquired in the bolt-on acquisitions Tony mention earlier in the second quarter. Elsewhere in the Cotton Valley program our operating partners are very active and we are pleased with the results we are seeing. At Elm Grove, we remain impressed with the performance of the Killen 13-3H well that our operating partner Petrohawk has discussed publicly. As they are the operator we will let them discus the specifics of the horizontal program in Elm Grove, but we're very encouraged by what we are seeing in that program. In the James Lime, we have several wells either drilling or completing at this time. We continue to like the play and are working to grow our acreage position, particularly to filling contiguous blocks. So we can get far enough ahead with our land work to increase the pace of our drilling program in several areas. We want to provide the quick update on our exposure in the Haynesville shale which is the newest topic in the ArkLaTex with a frenzy of leasing going on. Most of the discussion about the Haynesville has been about an area in northern Louisiana Caddo, DeSoto and Bossier parishes. The 10,000 net acres in the play that we have disclosed previously is located in fields in this general area. We've recently heard of leases being taken in that area for numbers approaching $7,000 an acre. However, based on the geologic work we've done so far, it appears to us that there is Haynesville potential in a much larger area than just these three parishes. At this point, we believe, we have roughly 50,000 net acres in the ArkLaTex with Haynesville shale potential. Obviously, it's very early days in the play, and it's going to be a learning pair of associated with making really successful wells in what is very different rock than in some other successful shale plays. Right now we're pursuing the very economic cotton valley horizontal program that I talked about earlier and we're ramping up on our technical effort on the Haynesville. Moving north, we thought for sometime that although the North Dakota Bakken play clearly has some sweet spots then it could potentially be a larger resource play. Our approach was to buy acreage in some areas that were initially less competitive to avoid the risks associated with a high cost of entry. We currently have about 37,000 net acres secured and are leasing. Activity has been moving toward us, and we participated in several wells and learnt from it. We have recently permitted 21 wells in our Powers Lake prospect area that's straddles the county line between Montreal and Burke counties in North Dakota. We're reallocating capital within the region to drill two to three wells later this year. And assuming good initial results, we're well positioned with resources and permits in place to accelerate that program. As many of you know, we've entered into an agreement with TXCO to participate in a program to test the Pearsall shale in the greater Maverick Basin in South Texas. We have a four well commitment for 2008 and the first well is currently drilling. If this program is successful, it exposes up to a large acreage position potentially at 75,000 net acres at a very low cost of entry. Deals like this are consistent with our desire to enter leverage plays earlier, something you should expect more often St. Mary in the future. I should also note that this opportunity came to us as a direct result of the strategic decision we made last year to enter the Maverick Basin through two almost play acquisitions. My last operational comment will be that our folks are doing a good job on what we call our operations excellence effort here internally. We test on that some in our comments on the Woodford, another example is been our operated Sweetie Peck asset in West Texas where we roll our drilling prospects 13% in 2008, this is something that we're working very hard at across the company and we're seeing positive results, some of which are already been reflected in the results we announced yesterday. On the guidance front we're increasing our production guidance to 108.5 to 112.5 BCFE for the year, this is as a result of additional capital investment in the Woodford, the impact of production associated with our bolt-on acquisitions in the Carthage Field in East Texas, and increased production from recently completed wells on our free lands of South Louisiana and offshore Gulf Coast. Offsetting these increases to the production forecast, our reductions totaling approximately 1 BCFE related to minor divestitures in the Rocky Mountain and Gulf Coast regions that will impact the remainder of 2008. We have left LOE per MCFE guidance flat for the year. The improvement in our cost structure as a result of our divestitures should continue to benefit us throughout the year. That said, there is continuing upward pressure on operating cost resulting from strong commodity prices and high activity levels in the industry. High commodity prices are also impacting our G&A, several components of our G&A are impacted directly by profitability, which is driven through a large extent by commodity price. In addition, our costs were hiring and retaining technical operations staff or increasing as prices stay high. Even where the future's markets are we felt we needed to bump up G&A a little to reflect the current market, both for our products and for our people. With that I'll turn that call back over to Tony.