Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Q1 2020 Solar Capital Limited Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the conference over to Michael Gross, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Solar Capital Limited. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much and good morning. Welcome to Solar Capital Limted's earnings call for the quarter ended, March 31, 2020. I'm joined here today by Bruce Spohler, our Co-CEO; and Richard Peteka our Chief Financial Officer. Rich before we begin, would you please start by covering the webcast and forward-looking statements?

Of course. Thanks Michael. I would like to remind everyone that today's call and webcast are being recorded. Please note that they are the property of Solar Capital Limited and that any unauthorized broadcasts in any form are strictly prohibited. This conference call is being webcast on our website at www.solarcapltd.com. Audio replays of this call will be made available later today as disclosed in our earnings press release. I would also like to call your attention to the customary disclosures in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Statements made in today's conference call and webcast may constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. These statements are not guarantees of our future performance, financial condition or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including the impact of COVID-19 and related changes in base interest rates and significant market volatility on our business, our portfolio companies and the global economy. Additionally past performance is not indicative of future results. Actual results may differ materially as a result of a number of factors including those described from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC. Solar Capital Limited undertakes no duty to update any forward-looking statements unless required to do so by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michael Gross.

Thank you very much, Rich. Good morning and thank you for joining us today. First and foremost, we hope that you and your family, friends and colleagues remain healthy and safe during this pandemic. Our thoughts are all with our stakeholders including the dedicated employees across Solar Capital and the company's investment adviser, Solar Capital Partners who continue to work-from-home with full business continuity. Also we would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to all the health care and other front line workers and our sincere condolences to those families who have lost love ones. The global spread of COVID-19 led to an unprecedented level of market volatility and dislocation in March. The shutdown response plunged the world into recession and financial markets into a broad-based and deep sell-off. The resulting Fed rate cuts a steep drop in inflate expectations and the flight to safety drove the U.S. Treasury 10-year yield below 1% for the first time in their more than 150-year history. Near-term liquidity issues have been partially mitigated by rapid and expansive U.S. monetary and fiscal policy response but uncertainty and volatility are expected to remain for the foreseeable future given the lack of clarity and timing of getting our economy back to work. To best serve our stakeholders during this evolving crisis, we are providing detail on our first quarter results as well as an update at April 30th. As we outlined in our stakeholder letter issued on April 1st, our conservative management of both our assets and liabilities have resulted in a defensive portfolio, stable funding, low leverage, strong liquidity and favorable positioning to make new investments. At March 31st, our net asset value per share was $19.24, representing a 10.3% decline from year-end. This is inclusive of a mark-to-market gain on our $150 million of…

Thank you, Michael. Solar Capital Limited's net asset value at March 31st 2020 was $813.1 million or $19.24 per share compared to $905.9 million or $21.44 per share at December 31st, 2019. At March 31st, 2020, Solar Capital's on balance sheet investment portfolio had a fair market value of $1.3 billion in 105 portfolio companies across 26 industries compared to a fair market value of $1.5 billion in 108 portfolio companies across 28 industries at December 31st. Turning to our funding profile and leverage, at March 31st, 2020, the company had no borrowings under its $620 million and $50 million revolving credit facilities and had approximately $60 million of cash on hand. As previously announced, in February 2020, Solar Capital secured an additional $75 million commitment to the company's primary credit facility. A month into the second quarter the company continued to have zero borrowings under these facilities and had $39 million of cash on hand at that time. Currently, our borrowing base far exceeds the capacity of our primary credit facility which provides us with full access to this capital. As of March 31st, 2020, Solar Capital had $446 million of fixed rate unsecured notes including the issuance in December 2019 of $200 million of unsecured notes consisting of $125 million of five-year notes and $75 million of 7-year notes. At March 31st, 2020, approximately 86% of the company's funded debt was comprised of unsecured term notes which gives the company significant unencumbered assets and provides meaningful overcollateralization of its combined $670 million secured credit facilities. Solar has used the same delivery construction with our liabilities as with our portfolio. As a reminder, the company has no near-term debt maturities having termed out its primary credit facility to 2024. In addition it has staggered maturities of its unsecured fixed…

Thank you, Rich. Solar Capital's portfolio has benefited greatly from Solar's initiative to expand its origination platform through the development and acquisition of specialty finance businesses. At quarter end, only 19% of our total portfolio exposure was in senior secured cash flow loans with the remaining 81% of our portfolio invested in our specialty finance strategies. At March 31, our $1.6 billion portfolio is highly diversified, encompassing over 190 borrowers across 80 different industries. Our largest industry exposures are health care providers and services, diversified financial services, which are predominantly insurance brokerage platforms and pharmaceuticals. The average investment per issuer was $8 million or 0.5% of the portfolio. At March 31, 99% of our portfolio at fair value consisted of senior secured loans. This was comprised of approximately 92% first lien assets and 7% second lien assets. Of our second lien loans, 3.7% were cash flow loans and 3.5% were asset-based loans which were subject to borrowing basis. We believe that our portfolio of predominantly first lien loans again 92%, which carry less risk than second lien and mezzanine loans will result in greater capital preservation during this crisis. At quarter end, our weighted average asset level yield was 10.6%. By focusing on our commercial finance verticals, we've been able to maintain our asset level yields above 10%, despite the sharp drop in LIBOR resulting from the Federal Reserve's efforts to the economy. Approximately 77% of our portfolio floating rate based, of these 80% have a LIBOR floor with a weighted average LIBOR floor of 1.1%. The 23% of our portfolio, which are fixed rate loans, are primarily in our equipment financing vertical. Today Solar has $446 million of fixed rate term debt and it's $620 million of floating rate credit facilities as well as our $50 million floating rate…

Thank you, Bruce. In closing, all of us at Solar Capital Partners would like to thank our shareholders for their continued support during this difficult time. We believe our team's expertise and ability to provide financing across cash flow and ABL solutions should enable Solar Capital to continue to support its existing portfolio of companies and importantly make new investments during this period of turmoil. Our ABL team is highly experienced in working with companies under financial stress, including asset liquidations and bankruptcies. Crystal Financial's model of originating asset-based loans for companies in transition has historically thrived during previous economic downturns. Additionally, our senior cash flow loan investment professionals have significant private equity experience and have managed credit portfolio through several economic cycles. As a result of recent fundraising, the Solar Capital Partners platform now has over $6.5 billion of investable capital, including potential leverage, with over $3 billion currently available to make new investments. SCP's private funds maintained a co-investment strategy with Solar Capital, which provides the company access to attractive co-investment opportunities and upper mid-market companies that otherwise would not have been able to make with its capital base alone. Specifically, the collective dry powder enables the platform to speak for large positions and to provide rescue financing, as well as add-on acquisition financing, when M&A activity resumes. Now more than ever, SCP's scale should serve as a competitive advantage for Solar Capital. Importantly, for Solar Capital, the scale and flexibility to finance cash flow and asset-based solutions for larger companies, it is a significant advantage today. Traditionally, the greatest investment opportunities exist during periods of market dislocation when capital is scarce. With approximately $700 million of available capital and a strong foundation, given our current high-quality portfolio and low leverage, we believe the company's positioned to originate…

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Ryan Lynch.

Hey. Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. And I hope you guys all are – you and your families are doing well. I first had a question a quick one on Crystal this quarter. It looked like Crystal income fell by about $1.5 million quarter-over-quarter. I believe you said all those loans are still on accrual status, but correct me if I'm wrong with that. So can you just talk about what drove the decline in recognizing the same level of income that you have in the past from that entity?

Sure. We did have a little bit of portfolio shrinkage early on. Ryan, which led to less income down there. And I think just in general we're being a little bit more conservative as you know velocity really drives in certain assets with Crystal a fair bit of prepayment fees. We weren't seeing that and we don't know that we're going to see that in this environment. So we sort of rightsize the dividend to reflect the current run rate until we begin to ramp that portfolio.

Okay. Makes sense. You guys are obviously sitting in a very advantageous position both with the low leverage on your balance sheet as well as the very flexible liability structure with a lot of unsecured debt and a significant amount of capacity on your credit facility. So capital deployment is going to be key for you guys. And again you guys are in a really good position. But right now, I know, you guys said the cash flow lending market seems like that's becoming a more favorable environment to be deploying capital into. It doesn't seem like there's really much activity going on in that market today. So can you just talk about the level of deal flow you are seeing? And what are your thoughts on kind of knowing that this is a very fluid situation kind of the pace of capital deployment going forward just given that it feels like primary markets issuances are pretty locked up right now?

Sure. Great question. As you know the last couple of years we've been shrinking our cash flow portfolio to up to 19% of the comprehensive portfolio. And yet until the first quarter where we really shrunk the portfolio, we have largely been running in place and that's because we're blessed with the specialty finance strategies that have been extremely active while we've stayed on the sidelines in cash flow. And a year -- 12 months, 18 months from now we think we'll look back and we'll see growth not only in our specialty finance verticals, but also in the cash flow book. You're right, Ryan in that it's not ramping up today. We are seeing some selective opportunities in cash flow, either from some of our peers who are selectively selling assets to create liquidity for their own platforms. So that's a good opportunity for us to add to things that, we already like and know. And then I think as we get deeper into 2020 we expect M&A activity will pick up not so much for new platforms, but for add-ons. We've been a big and active participant in putting more capital into situations that are growing and we're hearing from our sponsors that as they're stabilizing the existing companies. They are looking to take advantage of market dislocation to deploy substantial private equity capital that has been raised over the last couple of years and is sitting on the sidelines to add-on acquisitions at lower acquisition multiples. So, we expect to be extremely active in the cash flow vertical over the next 12 months.

Okay. That makes sense. And then just one more. In the past you guys have obviously made several platform acquisitions to grow out different lending verticals across your platform. I would think that there's probably going to be several platforms under scratch just broadly in the market some of these specialty lending – not in your portfolio, but across the landscape and stress you guys have always been active in engaging and looking for different platforms. Can you just talk about to your guys' willingness and an ability to potentially add-on a different – additional specialty lending platforms given the dislocation that's on coming?

Yeah. That's a great question. As you know, we have a team that is dedicated 100% to both looking for acquisitions, but also importantly, lending money to other specialty lenders. We have a fairly diverse portfolio that's performed incredibly, well since inception. In fact we've never had a default or payment default in that asset class. And so, our team right now is actively looking at situations, where other specialty lenders may need liquidity. And the nice thing about those is many times, we make those loans, and it gives us a real window into those companies and to figure out, whether they are an acquisition opportunity going forward. So yes, we are very active there. And given the breadth of platform today we're affecting strategic buyers now in many of the segments that we're in.

Okay. That makes sense. Those were all my questions. Bruce I did just want to say, I appreciate the update you gave on all the specialty lending verticals. I thought that provide a lot of detail and insights into how you're thinking about those businesses going forward. So really appreciate that. But those were all my question, I appreciate the time today. And hope you guys all stay well.

Thank you for questions.

And your next question comes from Casey Alexander.

Hi, good morning. First of all –

Good morning, Casey.

Let me thank you for your donation to the health care providers as a father of a front-line individual. I can't tell you how much I appreciate your generosity on that front. And with that Ryan asked a couple of my questions, but one of the things that I was wondering about cash flow loan is you know in economic theory there's late cycle defensive investments. And it would seem to me that some of that mentality might shift more towards early cycle recovery type industry targets. How does sort of your especially on the cash flow side your industry target focus change now that you're going on the offensive and arguably because this is happening so quickly, we're likely transitioning to something more early cycle on the way out on the other side over the next couple of quarters. How does that industry target change and create an opportunity? And also in the cash flow side, given some of the distress, would you also consider starting to take some equity slices as a way of helping to assist rebuilding NAV over the cycle?

Sure. Great question. So where we are today is really in that transition period. To your point Casey, where people are – owners are figuring out what do they own, and what are they going to support in which sectors that are going to again perhaps near term pressure. I don't know, what business won't – away from some of the essential services. So – and then to your point focus on recovery capital. And so what we're doing right now is using our asset base expertise to in sectors that we already are very comfortable with. We're not going to go into timing certain sectors. You know, that's just not our DNA. We're going to stay true to the high free cash flowing businesses albeit when businesses are open. And less cyclical businesses, we're not cyclical timers. But what we're doing is we're using our ABL expertise to partner with our cash flow teams to go into big sponsored companies with ABL solutions, so that we can get a toe in the door in businesses that we like. Lend at 10% plus type rates against receivables in large mid-market companies where they're carving out collateral for liquidity lines, because their BSL credit facility allows them to pull capital away from the current term loans. And then we're positioning ourselves on the recovery to your point to put capital from a cash flow perspective once we have visibility of cash flows into these companies. But I think the industry focus is going to be similar to what we see today and what we've done over the last several years. There's so much as you know to do in health care. It served us incredibly well. Again, not immune in this environment. There are a lot of nonessential services that have been delayed, but will be reopened once the emergency rooms and our medical facilities are open for non-COVID-related treatments. So we're going to stick to our knitting on industries. But we're going to position ourselves for recovery investing through rescue financing with our ABL capability.

That's a great answer. Secondly, I mean, of the BDCs that I cover your liquidity position is likely as strong and your leverage is low, and you've made an argument for maintaining the dividend. I don't recall if ever in the past if the Board has ever considered a share repurchase program. I hear your dissatisfaction with the stock price and perhaps that's another way to accretively build some NAV, while you're waiting to get more of your available liquidity to work. Has that ever been a consideration at the Board level?

So, just going back in history a little bit, and it's quite a while back. We had a quarter many, many years ago, where we had 25% of our portfolio literally repaid in one quarter. All with yields of loans that had come out of the crisis, so they were double-digit yielding loans, and it took a real dent into our earnings we actually cut our dividend by a third as a result of that, because we did not see a path to reinvesting in a reasonable time period. Back then the only strategy we're in was cash flow lending. So we did not have the luxury of all these different ways to invest and underwrite. And so, because of that we did cut the dividend significantly and we did actually buy back stock, because we did not see kind of the ability to re-ramp it in a reasonable period of time. I think the difference now is capital is so dear that -- and we have the investment strategy to be able to put it to work that we don't want to put that at risk. We've locked in incredibly cheap financing. And it's math. If you lose your equity whether it's through bad investments, because of default or you kind of pay back shareholders with it you can lose access to debt capital that is literally irreplaceable today.

Okay. Right. I appreciate your answers and look forward to seeing how it develops to the next couple of quarters. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you, Casey.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from Chris Kotowski.

Yes. Good morning. Thank you.

Good morning, Chris.

Good morning. It sounds like we should be expecting like for the next one two three quarters most of the growth is going to come from ABL lending. If that's a correct assumption? And I'm wondering are there -- it sounds like a more labor-intensive process than taking part of a cash flow loan and more monitoring of the collateral and all that? And are there volume constraints there, or is that something you can ramp reasonably at will?

Yes. That's a great question. And Chris as a supporter of both Solar and our sister BDC Solar Senior you appreciate that we had multiple ABL platforms across the firm. And so actually we are looking at situations where North Mill, our receivables back business over at SUNS is starting to source much larger facilities that we are sharing over at Solar and keeping a small piece of SUNS is appropriately sized for that portfolio. So we have tremendous capacity with 175 people. As you know most of them actually are dedicated to the blocking and tackling and monitoring and underwriting of collateral in the ABL sectors, as opposed to the casual business. So we feel very well positioned. And if anything what we have been doing as we announced earlier this week is beefing up origination. And particularly, origination in specialty vertical like Life Sciences, where we've had a tremendous track record with that team but also origination that can source transactions across our sites that's both cash flow and ABL.

Okay. All right. That's if for me. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Dodd.

Hi guys. Going back to the cash flow lending market, because obviously that's been something you haven't looked at for some time. One of the things you mentioned, are you seeing selected opportunities to buy essentially secondly loans, so not liquid market stuff, but loans from other credit shops that are selling to gain liquidity. What's your approach on that? I mean, obviously you can get maybe a little turn if they're selling at a discount, et cetera. But one of the hesitations you've had in cash flow over the last couple of years, it's not just the coupon but the structure. And what -- is there a point either in the secondary market or forward originations where the price is worth the weakness on structure either. How should we view that? This early cycle maybe the structure isn't quite as critical?

No. So that's a great question. When we talk about looking at buying secondary pieces from other credit funds of either loans that we've been in or loans we looked at we're talking about loans that were structured the way we'd be comfortable with. So we actually bid on a couple of pieces that were being sold by a public BDC and we got outbid but it was in a company that we're already lended to. So obviously we'd like the structure. To your question would we go by BSLs at a discount? The answer is it'd be extremely rare if we did that, because again having no covenants you basically are going to sit there until the thing works itself out. I think the one exception would be in is that we do extremely well had a maturity coming up in the next 12 months 18 months, we knew there was an event that we could possibly play a role in refinancing. But I think it's highly unlikely you'll see us go participate in the second -- in the liquid secondary market.

I appreciate that. And then on the forward and you said you're seeing some initial signs and having discussions with obviously sponsors who are looking potentially later this year to do add-ons and things like that. What's the reaction been so far on that in terms of like the pricing talk and to that point, again the structure talk? Because I presume anything you'd be willing to fund on that structures would be a lot tighter again than the sponsors had been able to get, but financing sights. So can you give us any color on how those very preliminary just…

Sure.

…going?

Yeah, I think from a high level structure is not even in negotiation. It's just thrown on the table right away. Having lived through cycles for 30-plus years Mike and I have seen this play out where the first thing that comes back is structure. So there's really not much of a negotiation around the edges of the covenants, but not around the existence of the covenants. So that's an easy dialogue. Where pens down without structure and that's always been the case as you know you've in the more throb environment. But then the critical factor is, obviously, leverage transactions where they were asking for five times to six times leverage they're now asking for four times to five times leverage. And again we're talking about upper mid market companies. And then on pricing, I think it's fair to say that it's very situational, but loans that were 7.5% to 8.5% are now no less than 9% opening conversation. With most importantly some call protection, which had been nonexistent as you know in cash flow lending particularly for a first lien loan. We're not going to rent out our balance sheet for 12 months and then get refinanced out if the markets should recover. And so we want to make sure we have a little bit of call protection, so that we get some duration as well.

Okay. And just one follow-up to that to your point Mike, the leverage used to be five times to six times adjusted EBITDA. So higher than on a real basis would be…

Yeah, we're not even discussing adjustments.

I appreciate it. Thanks a lot guys and stay healthy everybody. Thank you.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from Finian O'Shea. Finian O’Shea: Good morning, hi. A couple of questions on NEF that seem to have more cloudy remarks or less optimistic understandably given a lot of these businesses are smaller and cyclical. First question on PPP eligibility, is PPP funding able to support equipment lease obligations. And if that's the case is NEF also generally not an affiliate I guess question is, is this funding available to those issuers, and is that a line of support?

Yeah, that's a great question. So, yes, on one hand you're right. This is the portfolio that hopefully I made it clear we are watching closest in part because it is cyclical given the underlying borrowers and in part while the team has 30-year experience, they're newer to our platform. And we were not here during the 2008, 2009 crisis. But obviously we had the ability to underwrite that when we were able to partner with them and bring them on the platform. They do to answer your question Finian, have access to government stimulus by and large because these are not private equity owned firms so they avoid the affiliation issue. And our team has worked closely with as many of our borrowers as possible to provide access to that capital and give them a little bit of a lifeline and extend their ability to remain closed. Fortunately a number of them actually are in essential services. And as you know typically construction is something that is opening up sooner than others, when states are phasing through their reopenings. So we're watching it. It is a deal by deal. Fortunately, it's a very diverse portfolio. But this is the nature of that business, where there is a lot of discussions, you're getting monthly interest in principle. You have other pressure points on the borrowers and then you work with them to get through the difficult times. So early days, a lot of hand-to-hand combat, but government funding will definitely be helpful.

Appreciate that. And in the event that one of the borrowers in a more COVID-challenged industry goes through financial events bankruptcy et cetera. Do they continue to -- do they normally continue to pay interest on your ABL or is there a gap usually?

So are you interested in ABL or are you in equipment?

Equipment, sorry, but if you want to comment on that one as well...

In ABL, first of all I think it's important. You hit on a great topic. It's important to understand there's a lot of conversation over the last year or two, if we would hit a downturn our firm's -- private credit firms positioned to handle and weather a downturn themselves, not just in terms of liability structure and portfolio construction, but in terms of team skill set. And because of our ABL businesses, not only the Crystal team and the Nation's team, but our North Mill and gemino teams over at Solar Senior or sister BDC. That is what they do for a living. They work through bankruptcies they work through stress because they want to ensure that they are taking the collateral. And very often to your point, the companies are going to come out the other side and look to reorganize and operate. They're going to work with us so that we don't take the asset and foreclose and go liquidate the asset because they wanted in the operations. And so we very often are assumed if it's a lease or reinstated. Or repaid to the extent that there's a reorganization and were refinanced out. So that expertise though of being able to take these companies through a process be it a liquidation or reorganization is critical. And it's something that is an asset that hopefully we don't need to use often but it's critical in this time period.

Sure. That's helpful. And then just one final question. On the specialty finance verticals NEF, Crystal et cetera. On any view on the SEC release granted on April 8 would allow you to take your third-party manage funds and invest into these finance companies to expand them, has that been an item of discussion? And have you any view on that?

Actually this is the first time we will have discussed it. I think given the fact that we have $3 billion of available liquidity across the platform and each individual fund clear to liquidity, there's plenty of liquidity themselves. There's no need to do that for us at all.

Very well. That's all for me and thank you so much.

Thanks, Finian. Are there any more questions?

[Operator Instructions] There are no further questions. I would now like to turn the call back over to Michael Gross, Chairman and CEO.

Yes. This is Bruce. Before we turn it back over to Michael, I really just want to take a moment to thank not only the support of our investors in the research community, but Rich, Michael and I you guys get to spend a longer time with us. You can see us on the front lines, but we would not be in this position of strength from a fundamental portfolio perspective and positioned to be in an offensive mindset if it weren't for the 175 people at Solar. The senior team has really stepped up for us in a big, big way. And I think that is a huge credit to the team and the long duration that everybody has working together. There's a good thing that has come through this it is that we have accelerated the integration across the platform of all these different teams that have come together in a common cause a preservation of our investors' capital and looking for good opportunity. So we can't thank you guys much. We're incredibly proud to be part of this team.

Thank you and I'll reiterate that. And again, we appreciate everyone's time this morning. We know these are difficult times and we appreciate all of our shareholder support. And as you know, we try to be as transparent as possible. So please feel free to reach out to any of us with any questions you may have now or whenever you want. And we hope everyone remains safe and take care everybody.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.