Good morning. Thank you for joining the Sherwin-WilliamsCompany's review of the Third Quarter 2007 Financial Results and expectationsfor the Fourth Quarter and Full Year. With us on today's call are Chris Connor, Chairman and CEO.Shaun Hennessy, Senior VP, Finance and CFO. John Ault, Vice President andCorporate Controller and Bob Wells, Vice President Corporate Communications. The company has provided information regarding the thirdquarter and first nine months financial results. Business segments sales andprofits, balance sheet items and selected statistical data an their website,www.sherwin.com, under Investor Relations third quarter press release. Pleaseaccess this to supplement comments made on this call. This conference call will include certain forward-lookingstatement as defined under U.S. Federal Security Laws with respect to sales,earnings and other matters. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of thedate on which such statement is made and the company takes no obligation toupdate or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of newinformation, future events or otherwise. A further declaration regarding forward-looking statementsis provided in the company's release transmitted earlier this morning. Thiscall is being webcast simultaneously in listen-only mode via the Internet at www.sherwin.com. An archive replay of this webcast will be availableapproximately two hours after this conference call concludes. It can beaccessed at www.sherwin.com and will be available until Friday November 9th,2007 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. After the company's opening remarks we willopen this session to questions. I will now turn the call over to Bob Wells.

Thank you, Joe. I'll begin by summarizing overall companyperformance for 2007 versus third quarter 2006. Consolidated net salesincreased 3.8%, $2.2 billion. Primarily due to acquisitions, strong domesticpaint sales to commercial and industrial maintenance markets and stronginternational paint sales. During the third quarter, we completed four acquisitions,which combined with M.A. Bruder & Sons and Nitco Paints acquired earlierincreased third quarter consolidated sales by 2%. Consolidated gross profit increased by $52.6 million for thequarter to $988.4 million and gross margin increased 80 basis points to 45% ofsales. Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased slightly to30.5% of sales in the quarter to 30.7% last year, due primarily to tightspending controls. For the quarter, interest expense, net of interest andinvestment income was $15.2 million compared to $10.3 million last year dueprimarily to an increase in debt during the quarter. Consolidated profit before taxes for the third quarterincreased $17.6 million or 6.4% to $294.3 million. This improvement wasachieved despite a net increase of $13 million in net interest expense andother general and other expense net from higher environmental provisions andcurrency-related losses that were partially offset by increased gains on thesale of assets during the quarter. Our tax rate for the quarter was 31.9% compared to 35.3% inthe third quarter of '06. We expect our effective tax rate for the full year tobe slightly higher than our year-to-date 2007 rate of 32.4%. Consolidated net income for the quarter increased by $21.2million or 11.9% to $200.4 million. Net income as a percent of sales improvedto 9.1% in the third quarter this year from 8.5% last year due primarily toimproved operations. Diluted net income per common share for the quarterincreased 19.2% to $1.55 per share compared to $1.30 per share in the thirdquarter 2006. Acquisitions reduced diluted net income per common share for thequarter by $0.02 cents per…

Thanks, Bob and good morning everybody. Thanks for joiningus today. The third quarter of ‘07 was a solid quarter for the Sherwin-WilliamsCompany in many ways. We generated record sales, earnings and cash flow for thequarter. We completed four important acquisitions as Bob mentioned. Wecontinued to expand our controlled distribution platform domestically as wellas abroad, and we purchased 5.5 million shares of our stock. We’re pleased by to the improvements and consolidated netincome and earnings per share performance that we’ve reported for the quarter,up 12% and 19% respectfully. This morning, however, I want to take a fewminutes to highlight the profit performance of our operating segments duringthe quarter. Because I think, this clearly demonstrates the underlying strengthof our business model and the earnings power of our company. Combined segment profit for our three reportable segmentsincreased by almost $31 million more than 9%, and the sales improvement of 3.8%.Sales from acquisitions, which were slightly diluted earnings contributed 2% ofour total 3.8% increase in consolidated sales. Clearly our operating segments are hitting their stride interms of managing expenses and maximizing our profit flow through. All threesegments posted strong operating margin increases for the quarter and werecovered an additional 80 basis points of consolidated gross margin. We stillanticipate our consolidated gross margin for the year will be up more than 100basis points over last year. Importantly, the hard work our operating segments have doneto improve our profitability has come at the same time that we've continued toinvest in strengthening our capacity for future growth. During the third quarter, our paint store segment opened 29net new stores and added 41 new stores through the acquisition of Columbiapaint and coatings. During the first nine months of 2007, paint stores groupopened 59 net new stores and acquired 172 for a total increase in store countof 231 stores.…

(Operator Instructions) Our first question is from ArmandoLopez with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning everyone.

Good morning Armando.

Just a couple of quick questions, I guess first on the CapExcoming in lower than expected, could you maybe just talk a little bit moreabout what the variance around that is? And then second, in terms of the full year guidance of $4.70to $4.75 that seems like it would imply $0.80 to $0.85 fourth quarter, whichwould suggest a slowdown in the margin acceleration from the second and thirdquarter, if you could just talk a little bit about that?

Why don't I ask, Sean Hennessy to comment on our Cap Exnumber. Sean.

When you take a look at Cap Ex, Armando. We had a fewprojects that we were planning in land purchases that we've pushed out and oncapacity and that's really the main reason why our Cap Ex is going to be alittle lower this year.

Okay. So will that show up, then, next year? Or is it justlike postponing it a year?

Yeah, I think, that is as we watch the volume as we take alook at those things. Eventually they will spend that money, but we don'tthink, we didn't want to spend the money before we really needed to.

Okay.

And on the margin compression, I guess, $80 to $85, we'reseeing at $4.70 to $4.75. I think when you take a look at a lot of differentthings that are moving around in that quarter, I think our segments will be alittle compressed in one or two of the segments. But I think, for the full yearwe're going to show nice margin improvement in the three segments.

Okay. And thenjust one last one, in terms of the 30 million authorization for the buyback.

Yes.

Is there a timeframe that you're expecting to work through?

No, I don't think so. As we’ve said, this is consistent withour practice. Two years ago we received 20 million authorization from theboard, two years before that 20 million authorization. So this is just part ofour normal policy using excess cash to be opportunistic in the market.

Okay. Thanks a lot. Nice quarter, guys.

Thanks Armando.

Thank you. The next question is from P.J. Juvekar withCitiGroup. Please state your question.

Hi, this is Anthony standing in for P. J.

Good morning, Anthony.

Good morning. After looking at results from value spar andPPGX, so we've had a lot about residential weakness creeping into commercialconstruction and industrial order books. Could you comment on any deteriorationor softness you're seeing on industrial end markets?

Sure, we’ll be happy to. Our commercial and industrialactivity held up well in the third quarter. Fairly consistent with the samebuying levels that we've seen throughout the calendar year 2007. Kind of salesand earnings guidance that we've given for the fourth quarter assumes that samekind of market performance going into the fourth quarter. We would comment that for the industry, in calendar year2006, these commercial industrial markets were growing more robustly perhaps inthe double-digit range. And they have slowed down in '07. You know, theindustry forecasting, perhaps, even a little slower in '08. But we continue to believe this will be a positive segmentfor our company and we expect to make progress here.

Great. Great. And just following up, I mean, when you lookat the industrial end markets, if you look at auto or marine are theresub-segments where you're seeing particular strength or particular weakness? Oris it…?

Yeah. Anthony, I think that probably the strongest segmentthat we’re seeing is in industrial maintenance coatings. Not any particular enduser segment, but in general the protective finishes for Steel And Concretehave been very strong.

Okay. Great. Thanks, guys.

Thank you. The next question is from Eric Bosshard withCleveland Research Company. Please state your question.

Good morning.

Good morning, Eric.

Two questions. First of all, from a bigger pictureperspective, because when you came into the year you talked, I guess relativeto the beginning of the year you're going to end up earning $0.10 or $0.15 moreon sales there probably 4 or 5 points lower than what you had planned cominginto the year. Can you just explain, how you're making more money with weakersales?

Yeah. Eric, I think, part of the processes that we gothrough here with our management teams are to react to the markets environmentthat we face. And if you look at our SG&A expense. Particularly, we're really proud of the job our team hasdone to get that in line to see a lot of this slowing come ahead of time andpulled in. And the margin performance has also been strong for the company.

Within the gross margin performance, which you've done agood job on all year, is there anything you highlight that you've been able toaccomplish within that year during the year to create that upside?

Well, the two inputs to gross margin, both played a rolehere. First, pricing, and our ability through our controlled distributionplatform to get the necessary pricing over time has been indicated over thelast several years I think our team did a nice job, did well this year. And inthe raw materials input cost while we think for the industry is going to be upagain this year, year-over-year. We would comment on our team's job in managing through thatas best as possible. So, on both sides of that, we've been able to make someprogress this year.

And second question on the raw material issue. Clearly those(inaudible) in the last 30 or 60 days, the world is changing. Can you commentabout what your expectation is in terms of the industry's raw material costgrowth this year and sort of how you're thinking about positioning the businessin light of that as we move towards 2008?

Yeah. I think the raw material input for calendar '07 andthe third quarter, we saw continued to go up probably another 1 to 2% for theindustry. And I think we're moving our guidance up a little bit. We had talkedabout it being in the low single digits, maybe flat to up to 3%. It's our opinion now that the industry would see around 2 to4% raw material cost increase for this calendar year '08, it's a little earlyfor us Eric, yet to give guidance or pulling all those numbers together andwe'll be happy to comment on that on our first quarter call

And then just last, you commented earlier about commercial,but can you talk about the momentum of the business, September, October,indicated a commercial may be a little slower. But are you seeing things getbetter, get worse, stay the same? Can you give us a little sense on it?

No. Guidance were given for the quarter for sales in the midsingle digit range, which will be slightly better than what we've been able todo this year. It's been built pretty much the way that our years come togetherwith the Stars Group performing in the mid single digits and our global alittle bit higher and our consumer segment flattish. And the role that the commercial, industrial accounts areplaying in that store's business particularly, have been consistent. So, Iwould say there's really no significant change in the direction of what we'reseeing from our revenue.

Okay. That's great. Thank you.

The next question is from Chuck Cerankosky with FTN MidwestSecurities. Please state your question. I'm sorry; the question is from PeterThompson with Coho Partners. Please state your questions

I’m sorry. I just had a one quick one for you if it ispossible. Can you say how much you spent on the 5.5 million shares you bought?

Sure, Sean -- but in the …

Yes, the average price was $67, spent approximately $360million.

Okay. Can I just ask you one strategic question just on your-- on the Global Group? Could you just comment on kind of where you guys,you’re thinking that's going over the like three to five years?

Yeah, I think the Global Group will continue to be a strongdriver for us. We have given guidance that we expect it to grow at a highsingle digit, low double digit over the foreseeable timeframe that you'rereferencing. As you know, our strongest presence is in Latin America, andwe've continued to add to that position with some of these smaller acquisitionswe've commented on. And the company has shown an appetite to perhaps expand insome more of the growth markets with recent activities in China and India.

Is auto still being a gain market?

Our automotive business continues to focus on theafter-market. And they are a significant part of that Global Group. Theyrepresent about a third of those segments, revenue and profits.

Great. Thanks so much.

The next question is from Chuck Cerankosky with FTN Midwest.Please state your question.

Good afternoon or good morning, everyone.

Hi Chuck!

Hey, Chris! One for you, before I’m going for Sean, andlooking at the DIY demand trends. They seem to be better the stores in thequarter than in the consumer group, any particular reason for that?

Not particularly. Our retailing partners from our consumergroup pretty much across the Board were feeling some weakness out the door. Ithink that's been borne out by their comments and their calls and releases. Ourstore's business continues to really focus on the high-end DIY customer andable to make some marginal improvements there.

So, it sounds like it might be consumer segmentation here,quality versus price.

Yeah. I don't know that I'd go that far. These areparticularly from our store standpoint; it's not a big segment of what happensthere? Was just we had a good quarter.

Okay. Sean, if we're looking at the $0.02 that acquisitionscost earnings in the quarter. How would you break that down that operatinglosses or financing costs offsetting out and profits from the acquiredcompanies?

I would say 100% operating. As, we have come through, wehaven't completed our synergies and some of the expenses, we've had during theintegration sales, but I would say it's 100 operations.

When do you think that will flip into the positive?

I think, second quarter, probably around second quarter ofnext year.

So that will be more or less a slight drag until then?

Yes.

All right. Thank you. Great quarter.

Thanks, Chuck.

Thank you. The next question is from Jeff Zekauskas withJPMorgan. Please state your question.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning, Jeff.

This quarter our year sales grew about 30.8% and you'retalking about 5 to 6% sales growth in the fourth quarter. Where is theacceleration coming? Where is the extra two percentage points of growth comingfrom and why?

Well, I think, as we commented at the beginning of the year,Jeff. We knew, if the year went on, we have a little bit easier comparables sothat’s playing somewhat of a role here given the fourth quarter then we hadlast year. Beyond that, I think that, the strength that we've seen inparticularly the paint stores group and global group continues to give usconfidence that we're going to get these numbers.

How much was your gallon went up this quarter or for theyear, excluding acquisitions?

For the store's group, which is the best place for us tocomment on gallons, we were negative low-single digits in the quarter ongallons. And that's been fairly consistent for the year. Consumer with negative sales would have been a little bitmore backwards in gallon performance in global group had a probably mid-singledigit gallon volume improvement.

As first Rhode Island goes, so if it turns out that RhodeIsland determines Sherwin-Williams share of abatement cost is I don't know,$800 million? Are we going to see an $800 million cash outflow at a point intime? Or is that not the way to look at it?

That's way too early to make an assumption regarding, whatthis abatement, if it ever comes to that settlement will look like.

I mean, assuming that that were the number. Is that the wayit would affect Sherwin-Williams funds flow statement that way or would it not?

Well, the other issue that's unknown to us, at this time,Jeff, is what is the timing mechanism of what an abatement order might looklike in the future. So, if that were spread over a ten-year period or afive-year period, if other parties were brought into it. I just think, it'svery too speculative at this point to comment on that.

Lastly, in terms of raw materials, you spoke about theindustry being up 2 to 4%. I don’t know, it looked like TiO2 prices were downabout 10% and even acrylics were probably down in the first half as well. Do you think, raw materials are not really moving up thatfast? Or how do you get 2 to 4% increase?

Jeff, maybe you would like to accept the position as ourChief raw materials procurement agent, if you see a price like that.

That's terrific.

There is a lot of different components that go into thebasket of raw’s. And certainly, we've seen a pressure this year on the oilderivatives products, their packaging costs, demand for natural gas and energycomponents wherever that factors through has created some input. So all in, this is the trend that we've been seeing allyear. And as we've gone in the fourth quarter with oil up over into the mid andhigh 80s and even bumping against 90, this is what, we think is going tohappen.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you. The next question is from Saul Ludwig withKeyBanc. Please state your question.

All right. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Saul.

A lot of companies are complaining about distribution costand high fuel costs. How bigger deal is that as you ship this heavy materialall over the country?

Well, Saul. A couple of things. It has negatively affectedus and it has increased our cost of goods sold. We've put it through and youcan see, what happened to our margin. But, also the last couple of years we'vehedged our gasoline purchases for our fleet. And those hedges have really helped us in the last -- in thefirst three quarters of this year.

Is this going to be a problem going forward as your hedgesroll over?

No, because we've layered them. We have layers and we havesome that go out timing wise very well for us.

Okay. Great. How much did you spend for acquisitions in thethird quarter?

We spent $99 million in the third quarter and make us year-to-date $248 millionyear-to-date.

How do these businesses lose money? When you don't have toamortize any goodwill, you must to have paid some enormous multiple of EBITDAfor them to be diluted. I'm just trying to figure out how you’re actually havedilution on an acquisition these days?

Well, I think, Saul, when you sit there and take a look attaking care of the customer first, I think that both -- one of this -- onemajor acquisition we did this year was, I'd say, tight on SG&A at the storelevel and taking care of it. Just with timing, putting in some SG&A and soforth. But in the long run, it will be creative in the first full year we haveit.

Okay. Sean, I can't help but ask about the administrativecost line. We'd be disappointed if you didn't.

Saul, I'll tell you right now, if you will take a look atit, if you take a look at the line for the quarter we're at $66 million versus$53, which is up about $53 million. Really, let me tell you three factors thatcaused that to be a little higher than last year. We had a $12.5 million environmental provision we took inthe quarter. So, that was in that. Our interest expense was up about $4.7million. That's a little over $17 million. We also sold an asset. We sold thethird jet that we have, and we had a $6 million gain. So, when you put thosethree together between the interest and the environmental and the jet, it'sabout $11 million hit.

You had another $5million gain. Did you have an $11 milliongain on asset of that?

Right, $5million was in the store's operating segment ofthere was a piece of property from one of the acquisitions we've done a fewyears ago and so that other gain was in the store's operating segment.

Oh, that wasn't down in other income?

No, it wasn't?

Within the in the stores so that side of margin of thestores to some degree.

Yes. That helped the margin in the stores, yes.

Okay. And as we look to the fourth quarter, do we seeadministrative flattening out?

Yes. I think you're going to see flattening outyear-to-date, when you take a look at the $31 million, I know last year-to-dateI talked about benefits costing $14 million and environmental and interestexpense. But For the full year we do see that flattening out (inaudible) Forthe fourth quarter, not the full year? Yes, the fourth quarter…

All Right. Then also last year in the fourth quarter you hadonly a 22% tax rate. You also had a $16 million legal expense settlement, whichI assume won't reappear. But the tax rate, is this part of the reason in thisyear looking for 33% tax rate, last year a 22% tax rate. Is that an issue inthe lower rate of earnings per share growth?

Yes. If you take a look at it for the full year and thisquarter, as Bob mentioned, our tax rate was in the 31 versus 35. In the firstquarter it flipped the other way. For the full year we feel it will bemarginally higher than last year. You're right, in the fourth quarter we'regoing to have to go over that 22% tax rate.

Was the $16 million legal expense that you had last year,was that fully taxed? I mean, you got a tax benefit on that?

Not fully, but on the majority of it, yes.

Okay. And I guess, Chris, you say in the stores relative tothe down 6% of comp store sales, it was write down 2 5% in volume, which wouldapply up 1.9% in price, something like that?

Directly in that's close

Okay. Great. Thank you, guys.

Thanks, Tom.

Your next is from Greg Goodney (ph) with UBS. Please stateyour question.

High, guys.

Hi Greg.

The revenue for store on your acquisition is that part ofthe issue that the stores were slightly dilutive to earnings? Do you expect toget the revenues up to your average, which is, what about a 1.5 million bucks astore? And when would do you that?

Yes. I don't think the revenue impact at the acquisitionswas part of the operating losses Sean, was commenting on. Our expectations arethat these stores will start to perform closer to our levels in every way. Andit probably takes you around two to three years to get to that run rate.

Okay. How much of a GAAP is there now?

We wouldn't comment on that.

Okay. Next question. What's next on the M&A front? Isthat going to be it for a while or do you have more things planned?

Of course we have more things planned. Time will tellwhether we're successful with any of them.

So I shouldn't necessarily assume that M&A is going tominimal and that cash would be used exclusively for share buyback, then.

I think you can expect us for the remainder of the year aswell as into '08 and beyond we continue to use cash consistent with the way wehave been and we can find a creative acquisitions kind of in the size rangethat we're doing, we're going to make them.

Okay. Thanks, guys.

Thanks.

The next question is from Tim Isaac with Bear Stearns.Please state your question.

Yes. Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for the call.

Hi, Tim.

Hi. I was wondering on the lawsuit or the trial and withWisconsin (ph) that you mentioned its will probably be finished by November, isthat can you just give us a little bit more background on what the potentialoutcomes – outcome for that could be in sort of the down sides now? In other words, I guess if you lost, is that a punitivedamage situation? Or is it a class action status? You know and what would you need to appeal? Thank you.

Well Tim, I can't comment prospectively on what the damagesmight be. The suit is a personal injury lawsuit and it is a minor child whoallegedly was affected by ingesting led paint when he was a young child. And Wisconsin has a somewhat unique interpretation by theirSupreme Court pertaining to risk contribution theory of liability, which is whythis suit is being was brought in Wisconsin but, it is not a class action suit.It is a loan (inaudible) and the pretty straightforward suit in terms ofpersonal injury complaint.

Okay great and are they alleging a certain amount or is itkind of just is there like a dollar amount they are putting on at this point?

I don't believe there is. The plaintiff already made arecovery against the property owner.

Okay.

Okay so it is time to go after somewhat you're saying?

Yes.

Okay. Thank you very much. Congratulations on your quarter.

Yes.

(Operator Instructions) Next question is from Robert Follis,Gabelli & Company. Please state your question. Robert Follis - Gabelli & Company: Hi, guys. Most of my questions have been answered just acouple of quick ones. I guess first if I look at the operating income marginsfor the first three quarters really the highest level you see and probably the last five, six, seven years. So, just a couple of questions around that I guess firstly,how much of the improvement this year would you attribute to I guess operatingefficiencies, cost controls versus pricing above and beyond raw material costinflation?

I would tell you the we were completed, I wanted to jump inthere to answer, but hopefully you completed your question. But when you sitthere and take a look at our P&L and if you go right down to P&L, ourmargin is up 45 versus 44 year-to-date. The margin expansion that we've had compared to last year isreally first and foremost, that margin. Secondly as Chris mentioned earlierwhen Eric had that question, our SG&A is only up 4 times we've have beentwo straight quarters or SG&A as percent of sales went down. When you think about the amount of new stores andacquisitions and so forth and so, that's really goes back to your efficiencies.And I think that for this year, margin is probably 60%, the efficiency is 40.If you look at the long-term and say, okay, now let's look over to five, six,seven years, our gross margin, that 45 year-to-date is back toward the high endof where we were four years ago. I'd say 90% of what the margin expansion has really beenefficiencies and sales increases. Robert Follis - Gabelli & Company: So, would you say that despite what could potentially be anup tick in raw materials as heading to the fourth quarter into 2008, that you'dbe able to at least sustain current margins and then also, as you look as youlook out over the next three or five years. What do you see as the ceiling forthe margins?

Yes, I think if you look at the short-term, and if we wereto have a raw material increase in calendar year '08, if we were able tomaintain margins, our history, Robert, would indicate that perhaps for aquarter or two or longer, depending on the severity of the increase, we seemargin pressure. But over a period of time we're able to get pricing in themarket and recover those margins. And over a longer historical period, what we've done, aswe've gone through each of these cycles, as we've come out of it, we've gottenback to our previous high watermark and then actually been able to make alittle progress beyond that. Kind of the way we think about running the company as we goforward is we would expect over time, with operating efficiencies and continuedhard work that we can keep driving these margins perhaps 10 to 20 basis pointsa year so. There is no upward limit that we've ever established on what we canaccomplish here. Robert Follis - Gabelli & Company: Okay. So as I look to '08, perhaps some pressure, a littlebit of pressure if raw tick up further. Hopefully you'll make that up as you goalong.

To you and all the listeners, when we next get together onthe fourth quarter and full year conference call, which will be in the firstquarter of '08, we'll give you all that thinking in terms of what we expect tohappen to raws and how we'll manage to get through that. Robert Follis - Gabelli & Company: Okay. And then I guess lastly, you've done a great job inthe last three quarters controlling SG&A and bringing you down as a percentof sales. Is this sustainable? As we look forward, do you think you canmaintain this level?

Yeah. I think it's one of the hallmarks of the company. Ifyou think about it, a significant portion of our SG&A resides in our storeorganization, with 3200 stores. So the ability to manage that, to flex it whennecessary, and, again historically if you look back over periods, this has justbeen something the company has developed a habit and discipline in doing. So, our expectation going forward is that we will be in thatrange. It may go backwards 10 to 20 basis points, in a given period. But overtime and sustainable we would expect to be in that period or slightly better. Robert Follis - Gabelli & Company: Okay. Thanks for the help.

Thank you. The next question is from Saul Ludwig withKeyBanc. Please state your question.

Just a follow-up on this, the environmental costs which wereso much in the third quarter. As we look to fourth quarter, I don't know, eveninternally how you guys budget that number, but you've got to think about it, Iguess, and make a shot. Last year you had $6 million in environmental cost in thefourth quarter, year before you had $12.5 million. How should we think aboutthe fourth quarter, recognizing that it may be a mushy number?

I think it will be lower than last year. Okay. Thank youvery much.

I'm sorry, there are no questions in queue. I'd like to turnit back over to management for closing comments.

Thank you, Joe. I will be available all afternoon to answerany follow-up questions you have. I look forward to taking your calls. And asalways, we appreciate you joining us in this morning's call and thank you foryour interest in Sherwin-Williams.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's teleconference.You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.