Good day, everyone, and welcome to today’s program, Surgery Partners, Inc. Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this call may be recorded. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to CFO, Dave Doherty.

Good morning. My name is Dave Doherty, CFO of Surgery Partners. I’m joined today by Eric Evans, our CEO; and Wayne DeVeydt, our Executive Chairman. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements. There are risk factors that could cause future results to be materially different from these statements. These risk factors are described in this morning’s press release and the reports we file with the SEC, each of which are available on our website, surgerypartners.com. The company does not undertake any duty to update these forward-looking statements. In addition, we will reference certain financial measures that are considered non-GAAP, which we believe can be useful in evaluating our performance. The presentation of this information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. These measures are reconciled to the most applicable GAAP measure in this morning’s press release. With that, I will turn the call over to Wayne. Wayne?

Thank you, Dave. Good morning, and thank you all for joining us today. My initial comments will briefly highlight our consolidated second quarter results and the consistency of our long-term growth algorithm. I’ll then provide a brief update on our recent acquisition activity and refreshed outlook for the balance of the year. Eric and Dave will provide additional insights with their remarks. Turning to our second quarter results. We reported net revenue of $762 million, representing growth of 14.2% over the prior year quarter. On a same-facility basis, net revenues grew just under 10%, with surgical case volume growth in the quarter just under 4%. Adjusted EBITDA grew 18% to $118.3 million, generating adjusted EBITDA margins of 15.5%, expanding 50 basis points as compared to the prior year quarter. Our efforts to pursue higher acuity procedures continue to produce strong results with total joint replacements in our ASCs increasing 46% in the first half of 2024 over the comparable period in 2023. Eric will provide additional insights into our physician recruitment and expansion of our total joint programs, including our success in targeting orthopedic surgeons specializing in total shoulder procedures which were moved to the ASC covered list starting January 1 of this year. We continue to be extremely pleased with our same-facility growth and the expected long-term sustainability of our organic top line and margin expansion growth goals. As previously stated, our short-stay surgical facilities have been purpose-built to capture the macro tailwinds of both an aging population and the increased shift in site of care for higher acuity procedures into our lower-cost, high clinical quality outpatient settings. We believe our results reflect the strength and durability of our business model as we pursue this highly fragmented market, which currently consists of over 6,000 CMS-certified ASCs and an estimated…

Thanks, Wayne, and good morning, everyone. On behalf of the entire management team, we are proud to release second quarter results that demonstrate our continued and consistent organic growth and the addition of five facilities to our portfolio of purpose-built short-stay surgical facilities. Once again, all elements of our long-term growth algorithm contributed to double-digit top line and bottom line growth. Diving deeper into our results. Same-facility net revenue growth was 9.9% in the second quarter, comprised of 3.9% growth in our surgical case volume and 5.7% rate improvement. We continue to put increased focus on both physician recruitment activities and higher acuity procedures that would benefit from an enhanced patient and physician experience associated with our purpose-built short-stay surgical facilities. On a consolidated basis, our specialty case mix and volumes were in line with our expectations, with 166,500 consolidated surgical cases in the quarter, with particular focus on our higher acuity business lines. Continuing the wave of positive recruiting, over 200 new physicians have started utilizing our facilities in the second quarter, with just under half specializing in high acuity areas such as orthopedics, spine and cardiology. This brings our total recruits for the first half of the year to just over 400. The initial volume and average rate per case performed by these newly recruited physicians exceed the volume and rates from last year’s recruiting cohort. As a reminder, each of our recruiting cohorts continue to drive strong compounding year-over-year growth with our 2023 class generating 164% more revenue in the first half of 2024 as compared to the first half of 2023. Our recruitment activities and growth in recent de novos and acquisitions have continued to fuel our growth, especially in musculoskeletal with nearly 128,000 MSK-related procedures performed in the first half of 2024, representing 19% growth…

Thanks, Eric. Starting with the top line, we performed 166,500 consolidated surgical cases and 194,000 total surgical cases in the second quarter. These cases spanned across all our specialties, with an increasing focus on higher acuity procedures, which is reflected in our near double-digit same-facility revenue growth this quarter. The combined case growth in higher acuity specialties, specific managed care actions and the continued impact of acquisitions supported revenue growth of 14.2% over last year to $762.1 million. On a same-facility basis, total revenue increased 9.9% in the second quarter. Same-facility surgical case growth was 3.9%, with higher rates of growth in our orthopedic and other higher acuity procedures, which also contributed to rate growth of 5.7%. We continue to forecast our same-facility net revenue growth to exceed our growth algorithm target of 4% to 6% in 2024, with full year same-facility revenue finishing in the high single-digit range. Our forecast anticipates net revenue being more balanced between rate and volume on an annualized basis, with rate playing a smaller role and volume playing a larger role in the second half of the year. Adjusted EBITDA was $118.3 million for the second quarter, giving us a margin of 15.5%, in line with our expectations of continued margin expansion. Inflationary pressures related to labor and supply costs continue to abate as we return to a more normalized run rate that provides natural margin expansion as we grow revenue. We will remain vigilant in monitoring these factors across our portfolio and expect margins to continue to improve throughout the year with annualized margins improving by at least 50 basis points over full year 2023. We ended the quarter with $214 million in cash. When combined with the available revolver capacity, we had over $860 million in total liquidity. We reported operating cash…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We’ll take our first question from Brian Tanquilut of Jefferies. Your line is open.

Hey good morning guys and congrats on the quarter. Maybe, Dave, just curious, you talked about how the rate and the volume contribution to same-store should be more balanced in the back half of the year. Obviously, rate has been strong with acuity levels driving that. So just curious, what are you seeing? Or what are you thinking in the back half that would shift that balance to more even between the two?

Thanks, Brian. Appreciate the question. The math that sits behind the same-store calculation is probably going to be your biggest driver of your same-facility case growth that we’re going to see in the second half of the year. And just a reminder, the way we look at our same-store calculation tends to go beyond just one quarter of an evaluation. It’s only because there’s only 60 days to 62 days – business operating days inside in a given quarter. So you can see those being affected by the days of the week that sit inside there. So when we look at year-over-year, third quarter and fourth quarter, the surgical days that we have in both of those quarters are more favorable as when you look at our portfolio, surgical cases and where we think. And the best example I can kind of give that is the timing of when the 4th of July happened for us, inside the third quarter of last year and inside the third quarter of this year for us. But what we do anticipate, as we’ve been talking about all year, Brian, is getting back to our growth algorithm as we sit through both case side and rate side of our same facility calculations. And at the balance of the year, we expect it to add up to be somewhat greater than our long-term growth algorithm would suggest, which has been consistent with what we’ve been reporting over the past couple of years.

Got it. And then maybe, Dave, just to follow up on that, as I think about seasonality, I mean I understand, obviously, like you said, where 4th of July fell, but just curious how should we be thinking about the seasonality pattern for EBITDA for the back half?

I think our seasonality has been largely predictable in that the fourth quarter tends to be our biggest quarter, and that’s the result of the deductible swing that happens as commercial patients tend to rush to use their deductible balance by the end of the year. So our fourth quarter always is our strongest quarter from an EBITDA perspective as well as from a revenue perspective. We don’t see that pattern changing this year.

Awesome. Thank you.

We’ll take our next question from Tao Qiu of Macquarie.

Hey, good morning. I’d like to break down a little bit the revenue and margin increase in terms of the guidance. How much of that is from organic growth based on strong volume this quarter? And how much of that is from acquisitions and de novos as you mature these? Thanks.

Yes. Thanks, Tao. We have a little bit of a nice background music coming through on our side here from the line this morning. But let me attempt to answer our revenue beat. Our revenue calculations for the quarter – or revenue, I’m sorry, did come in at our expectations, perhaps slightly above the expectations of the Street. And we did get contributions from our most recent acquisitions. As you know, we talked about on our last call, we completed sizable acquisitions inside the second quarter. And on the year-to-date basis, we’ve met our capital deployment goals for the year. So we’re definitely getting some benefit from those acquisitions as well as the contributions from last year. But I will say, and I would have you focus on the same facility rate growth or revenue total growth at close to 10%, leads you to the conclusion, or should lead you to the conclusion that a majority of our beat is coming from the organic side of the business.

Yes. I was more interested on the – in terms of the guidance raise, how much of the additional revenue and margin upside is from organic versus de novo acquisitions. Thanks.

Yes. Tao, to answer that, it’s very consistent with what we’ve done over the past several years. Our algorithm is majority same-store organic, continues to be that, it continues to be that going forward. Certainly, our timing is a little bit ahead on M&A this year. But in general, like we’re right on expectations of how we expect to grow per our algorithm, which is majority coming from organic, supplemented by strong M&A performance.

Yes. Maybe just to emphasize that, if you go back to how we’ve talked about same-facility revenue growth for the year, it has been at just about 10% now on a year-to-date basis. And we expect revenue to end the year in the high single digits.

Got you. And my second question is, I don’t know whether you guys talk about the cash collection trend during the quarter, what was the DSO during the second quarter? Any updated view on the free cash flow generation for 2024 and maybe early read for 2025? Thank you.

Yes. So cash flow has been positive for us. I think you saw what we reported for the second quarter. It’s again consistent with where we expected it to be. We are seeing continued benefit from our investment on the revenue cycle side of the equation. We’re not changing our guidance for the year in terms of cash flow generation. We still feel confident in our ability to deliver on that. And at this point, we are not giving 2025 guidance.

Got it. Thank you.

You’re welcome.

We’ll take our next question from Kevin Fischbeck of Bank of America.

Thanks. Just wanted to kind of focus on the volume number. I think after Q1, I was kind of a little surprised by how weak some of the volumes were for you and your competitor. And then this quarter seems to be a whole lot stronger. Is it just as simple as kind of a calendar? Or do you see like kind of a firming fundamental demand from Q1 into Q2?

Hey Kevin, thanks for the question. This is Eric. Hey Just I’d answer that in a couple of ways. First of all, we really try not to focus on case count by a quarterly basis. It really is not that meaningful. We do focus on that net revenue, same-store growth number, but it is very affected by the calendar. We’ve said even at the end of last year coming into this year, when we had a little bit of a print that came out slightly below our algorithm, that by the end of the year, we expect it to be at the upper range or exceed our algorithm. We’re still very confident in that. It’s a consistent business. Our model is consistent. And so I think from quarter-to-quarter, there’s a lot of reaction sometimes to those numbers. But it’s calendar-based, it’s timing based. And quite honestly, we think about that on annual terms. We continue to believe we’re going to exceed our algorithm again this year.

Okay. That’s great. And then, I guess, when you think about the ability to exceed that this year, is that driven by – I don’t know if you can separate easily, again, I might call core demand versus some of the company-specific things that you’re doing around the physician recruiting, et cetera, any color there?

Yes. So I think – first of all, we’re obviously confident we’re going to grow the business. On higher acuity procedures, you see that flowing through on physician recruitment, really, really proud of the start to the year, our strongest start on physician recruitment. So all of that continues to work well. But what I would point to is over the last five years, we’ve had really consistent case growth. It might bounce around quarter-to-quarter. We continue to see that strong demand this year, and it’s not different than past years. It’s just part of our model, and we do expect it to end up in the very much the same place.

All right. Great. Thanks.

Our next question is from Andrew Mok of Barclays.

Hi, good morning. It looks like there was a pretty meaningful increase in professional fees in the quarter. I think it was up 10% per case and over 100 basis points year-over-year. So I just want to get a little bit more color on what’s driving that increase? Thanks.

Yes. I actually, Andrew, like I’ll have to give you a follow-up on what sits behind that increase in that. But I think it’s going to be partly, yes, the mix of business that kind of comes through from our acquisitions and divestitures from last year. So our divestitures, as a reminder, for last year had high revenue kind of associated with it, higher medical costs on the supply chain side. But as a result of that mix in business, you’re going to see kind of a slightly different margin profile on that book of business, and I suspect that, that must be coming through on the professional medical fee side. But I’ll give you a follow-up when we talk later.

Okay. Great. That’s helpful. And then on the free cash flow, I just wanted to follow up there. It sounds like you guys are confident around the annual targets for this year. I think year-to-date free cash flow is tracking around $22 million. So just what’s driving that confidence in the full year? And what’s driving that second half acceleration? Thanks.

Yes. The free cash flow number is in line with where we expected it to be. It is a bit – it’s wonky, as we’ve talked about last year, because of the timing of collections. But what we’ve seen inside the second quarter is directly in line with what our internal expectations were. So that gives us increased confidence in our ability to kind of hit there. The book of business is seasonally adjusted. First half of the year is going to be affected by distributions that come from last year. So the strong earnings inside the fourth quarter of last year do increase distributions for the first half of the year. That trend goes down a little bit, and of course, the book of business generates a lot more cash flow in the second half of the year.

Great. Thanks for the color.

We’ll take our next question from Jason Cassorla of Citi.

Great. Thanks. Good morning. I just wanted to go back to your commentary around capital deployment. It sounds like you’ve met your capital deployment goals this year. Should we be reading into that in terms of your remaining deployment for the year being a bit more muted? Or are you keeping optionality open for incremental capital deployment? Just any incremental color around capital deployment, how you’re thinking about the back half and the go forward would be helpful.

Hey Jason, much appreciated. Yes, while we’ve achieved our full year goals for the year, I would remind you that, of the $280 million [ph], $60 million of that did relate to the prior year fourth quarter. We closed it in the first week of January. So you’re looking at around $220 million, which was deploying our targeted goal of $200 million plus remaining cash proceeds from dispensatories from last year. So at this point, anything we do in the back half of the year is clearly going to be icing. We continue to have a strong pipeline. We like the optionality of that pipeline. We have LOIs on a number of items and a number of items that are under LOI. So I don’t think we’re going to postpone acquisitions if the timing is right and the quality of the asset is there. But I would also say, as you know, these acquisitions can be very fickle. And so it’s always about having a robust pipeline so that you can respond accordingly. But I would just read it as we continue to be a partner of choice, and we like where we stand relative to the current pipeline. And if opportunities present themselves, we’ll take advantage of them in the back half of the year.

Okay. Great. Thanks. Helpful. And then I just wanted to ask around total shoulders. They’ve been pretty sizable benefit this year. Can you just remind us the opportunity set on the shoulder side? And then just kind of given the complexity of total shoulders, how we should think about kind of like the margin considerations as those continue to move into the ASP? Just any more color around the shoulder opportunity set? And kind of how we should think about margins for that service side.

Hey, Jason. It’s Eric, thanks for the question. The total opportunity is quite large. I mean, even amongst the current doctors on our staff, it’s in the thousands of procedures, right? And that’s not counting the recruitment team’s focus on finding total shoulder docs that maybe weren’t using us in the past. So we feel really, really good about our opportunity there to continue to grow it. You are right, higher acuity procedures, especially when we first get into them, it takes them a little time to get the shoulder prices down. The margin profile will grow over time as we grow our volume and as we use our scale to really drive efficiencies on those procedures. So beginning, that pass-through cost is a little bit higher than you would have over time. But as we grow market share in that, I expect that you’re going to see that the margin is going to grow and that we actually think, again, we’re early innings there of moving procedures over starting with our existing docs who had procedures they could bring, and then followed up by, of course, really dedicated recruitment on those particular procedures in our markets.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll move next to Bill Sutherland of Benchmark Company.

Hey, thanks. Good morning everybody. Wayne, I think you mentioned about the procedures coming off the inpatient-only list, or maybe it was Eric, I’m not sure. Can you just give us a little more color on what’s coming off and kind of how you think about the potential for you guys?

Hey Bill, it’s Eric. There’s not a lot of news right now about stuff coming off of the inpatient-only list for this year. As you know, last year, the early read was there wasn’t much coming off, and then we got total shoulders added at the end. We continue to be – we have so much room on the stuff they’ve added over the last few years. We feel good about what’s out there. Certainly, we’re always pushing every year as technology gets better, there’s more opportunities for us to move procedures out. We talk a lot about our $150 billion TAM, $110 billion of that stuff is still going to move out of the traditional acute care setting, and a lot of that has to do with technology changes and higher acuity procedures every year. So look, we expect that March to continue. It’s sometimes incremental, sometimes it’s got big jumps like it did during COVID when we got all the cardiology procedures and the rest of orthopedics. But look, I think you’re going to continue to see it grow what comes off that list just because the math is too compelling. We save a ton of money for procedures; they’re safely done in our setting. And so we’re going to continue to push on that every year. There’s nothing specific this year that’s as meaningful as total shoulders at this point, but we’re always watching that list.

And then, Wayne, back to your capital deployment comment. As your platform gets bigger and bigger, do you think we should think about – I mean, are you guys thinking about maybe an annual target that’s greater than $200 million?

Hey Bill, it’s a really good question. I think we would continue to target the $200 million though for the next three to five. I mean, to be fair, could we do a little more in any one year and create some lumpiness? Yes. But we’re committed to the sub-three times leverage goal that we’ve laid out to our shareholder base. And so to ultimately accomplish that goal, we’re going to be in that $200 million range. Again, could we go up in any one year? Yes. But long term over time, that’s where I think we would anticipate continuing to target.

Great. Thanks everybody.

Thank you. We’ll take our next question from Whit Mayo of Leerink Partners. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks. Dave, I may have missed this and I know you don’t have a formal target this year around free cash flow, but just any thoughts around like how we should maybe think about the cash flow this year?

Yes, good morning, Whit. Yes. You did miss it. We are talking about our same target of $140 million to $160 million [ph] as we end the year.

Okay. Great. On state supplemental programs, last year, Idaho was a benefit. That’s kind of a little bit of attention, just anything in the quarter or anything for the year that we should be aware of?

No, nothing material. I mean, those programs, as you probably know, so a very, very low percentage of our business is Medicaid. So we’re not that impacted by it. So I think our total mix is around 5%. So like those programs are very rarely material for us, but in this year, that’s holding true.

Okay, thanks guys.

And we’ll take our final question from Ryan Langston of TD Cowen.

This is Will Spivack on for Ryan. Just kind of wondering about stock comp in the quarter. It was a little bit higher than quarterly averages. Was that related to the acquisitions in the quarter. And as well, if you could maybe just let us know what the revenue divestiture headwind was in the quarter. And I think that was going to drop to zero in the back half of the year. Is that still accurate.

Yes. Well, the – just take those in order. The stock comp piece is really just timing of vesting activity as well as just the kind of the normal roll rate that would happen with this. Nothing unusual inside the stock comp piece. The revenue that we overcame from divestitures was minimal inside the quarter. Most of our divestiture were completed within the first half of last year. So there was a marginal impact inside the second quarter, but not material enough for us to kind of call out. And you’re right, that’s not considered a headwind for us as we look at the back half of the year.

Thank you.

This does conclude our question-and-answer session. I’d be happy to return the call to Eric Evans for closing comments.

Thank you. Before we conclude today, and on behalf of the entire management team, I’d like to thank our 13,500-plus teammates that partner with our physician owners every day, delivering on our mission to enhance patient quality of life through partnership. Thank you for joining our call this morning, and have a great day.

This does conclude today’s Surgery Partners Incorporated Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. You may now disconnect. And everyone, have a great day.