Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Sight Sciences Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. And, I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Trip Taylor. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you for participating in today’s call. Presenting today are Sight Sciences’ Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Paul Badawi; and Chief Financial Officer, Jesse Selnick. Earlier today, Sight Sciences released financial results for the 3 months ended June 30, 2022. A copy of the press release is available on the company’s website at investors.sightsciences.com. I’d like to remind everyone that comments made by management today and answers to questions will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Those include statements related to Sight Sciences’ anticipated financial performance and operating results, market opportunity, the future impact of COVID-19 on operations, business strategy, and plans for developing and marketing new products. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions as of today and are neither promises nor guarantees and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. A description of some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements on this call can be found in the Risk Factors section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 24, 2022 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements except as required by law. For more information, please refer to the forward-looking statement notices and risk factors in the recent SEC filings. I will now turn the call over to Paul.

Thanks, Trip, and thank you all for joining us. Our third quarter results reflect continued strength and execution across our entire business. We are pleased with the progress we were making, penetrating and expanding both the MIGS and dry eye treatment markets, while taking the necessary steps to position the business to reach positive free cash flow in 2025. In the period, we achieved total revenue of $18.7 million, representing 43% growth year-over-year and 8% growth sequentially. Surgical Glaucoma revenue grew 37% year-over-year and 7% sequentially to $17.1 million in the third quarter, and Dry Eye revenue grew 145% year-over-year and 21% sequentially. We ended the quarter with just under $200 million of cash, which we currently expect will be more than enough to support our growth plan until we reach cash flow breakeven. And, Jesse will elaborate on in his remarks we plan to achieve our intermediate growth targets with more moderate headcount growth and significant reductions in non-labor operating expenses. We expect to significantly reduce cash burn in 2023 and going forward, while driving continued robust top-line growth. We achieved several milestones in the third quarter, including: one, the successful introduction of SION, our innovative bladeless goniotomy device; two, the complete enrollment of SAHARA, our transformative dry eye RCT for the TearCare system; and three, the publication of multiple peer-reviewed articles featuring compelling clinical data that demonstrates expansive market opportunities for both OMNI and TearCare. Each of these commercially minded achievements strengthens our foundation for long-term market leadership and charge greenfield paths to growth in both glaucoma and dry eye. Now, I would like to discuss the highly productive third quarter in detail for both of our business units, starting with Surgical Glaucoma. Our core mission in Surgical Glaucoma is to equip surgeons with the best possible solutions…

Thanks, Paul. We posted record third quarter revenue of $18.7 million, representing 43% growth year-over-year and 8.4% growth sequentially. This is an extremely strong result in a weak seasonal quarter in our industry. As a point of comparison in the third quarter of 2021, we grew only 4.5% sequentially that we achieved 77% revenue growth for the year. Both OMNI and TearCare performed well in the quarter that we comfortably exceeded consensus revenue estimates, even without SION small revenue contribution in the tail end of the quarter. Overall, we were quite pleased with our progress as we strengthen our leading position through continued share growth and market expansion in our 2 more established products, and SION fully launches into the market in the fourth quarter and in 2023. Our Surgical Glaucoma revenues for the third quarter were $17.1 million, up 37% from $12.4 million in the third quarter of 2021 and sequentially up to 7.4%, which represents a nearly 400 basis point improvement over our comparable sequential growth in the third quarter of 2021. We continue to show strong underlying growth fundamentals in retention and ordering facilities. While utilization increased notably which is a critical measuring stick for our market expansion efforts behind. 913 facilities ordered OMNI during the third quarter compared to 875 facilities in the second quarter, demonstrating the continued combination of strong new customer acquisition activity and our high retention rate. Our developed customer retention rate, which is designed to measure the percentage of our embedded facility base from the previous quarter that reorders in the most recent quarter, was over 99% in Q3. SURGICAL GLAUCOMA customer acquisition funnel remains strong for both products, which creates great momentum for the rest of 2022 and into 2023. In the third quarter of 2022, we trained over 160 new…

Thanks, Jesse. Before we head into Q&A some brief summary comments and why we are so enthusiastic on where our company is positioned today. Number one, we grew 8.4% sequentially in Q3, a much higher growth rate than third quarter of 2021 during a 77% revenue growth year. Number two, we created an extremely robust growth funnel by training new surgeons and winning new accounts to a level that we believe will support our near- and medium-term growth objectives. Number three, we are actively expanding the actionable addressable market with compelling real world clinical data and studies like TREY. Number four, we will remain disciplined on OpEx and committed to our outstanding unit economics with another mid-80s gross margin results for the quarter, which placed us in a confident liquidity position. And lastly, we just want to thank all of our physicians, customers and patients for their trust in us and our employees for executing our vision with excellence. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open up the call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from [Mike Aaron] [ph] of William Blair. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question, and congrats on the quarter. Just wanted to ask an update on some of the trials we’ve seen so far throughout the year. So you guys have previously said you expect this to continue into the second half. But now that we’re heading towards the end of the year and nearing 2023, what have you guys seen recently on the competitive trialing process? Do you expect some of these headwinds to continue into next year at all?

Yeah. Hi, I’ll take that. I think, it’s quiet, the competition is out there. And I’ll just say that, as it relates to competition, I’ve always found the best way to compete is to elevate your game to a level where others can’t keep up. I guess, we should give our competition credit for their efforts this past year. But the simple reality for us is we’ve continued to elevate ourselves and our continued growth, our continued performance, it speaks for itself. And the momentum we’re generating will carry us straight into 2023. At Sight, we elevate and outperform through product design excellence, customer focus, and we never lose sight of the fact that helping our eye care professionals’ better treat their patients is our opportunity and our obligation. So today, the two fastest growing segments in MIGS, it’s goniotomy and canaloplasty. And we’re fortunate, we believe we have the two best-in-class products for those two fast growing segments, where OMNI in the canaloplasty segment, and SION in the goniotomy segment. Through our rapidly growing user base, we’re hearing routinely that that OMNI is being referred to as the most efficacious product in MIGS. So why does that matter? It matters, because preventing visual field loss progression with glaucoma requires efficacy that OMNI has proven to deliver in multiple peer-reviewed publications and through real world surgeon outcomes. So with SION leading the way in goniotomy, with OMNI leading the way in canaloplasty anatomy and expanding the market, we feel very confident in our position. Again, our performance in the third quarter speaks for itself, the momentum we have right now speaks for itself. And I don’t think we’ve ever been more bullish heading into a new year than we are today.

Got it. And then maybe a quick one on the market development side of things. So you mentioned the GCC accounts some of them seen higher growth than some of the non-GCC accounts. Are you guys planning on expanding the team of GCC is moving forward? Or are there any other market development efforts that you’re working on our plan that we should be thinking about? Thanks for taking my questions.

Right. We’re actually at the stage, where – what we’re doing is, we were taking the best practices of where there has been tangible successes within the GCC team, and we’re rolling them out, and we’re integrating it across the organization. So there’s – we anticipate continued contribution and contribution increase from that investment. But we’re not increasing our investment today, because we’ve got several quarters of good learnings about where their efforts have been successful, and we’ll generate a nice return by just institutionalizing that across the organization.

I’d just like to add to that on standalone market development, because it’s important. It’s really driven by two tactics, one identifying and educating patients and primary care providers on OMNI’s unique design. It’s got a design that allows doctors to address the entire disease outflow pathway and all three sources of resistance in that pathway. Those kinds of initiatives are scalable and their reach and impact via peer-to-peer tactics, direct-to-patient education initiatives. And they’ll be executed by our entire team and highly competent external partners. And the second tactic helping our trained OMNI surgeons counsel and educate their patients on the value of the OMNI procedure and how it can help them better treat their glaucoma. Yeah, this surgeon education initiative is prescriptive in nature gives our surgeons with glaucoma treatment triage algorithm helps them make a strong recommendation for when OMNI surgical intervention is right for the patient. So, all in all, when you combine patient education and identification initiatives, with surgeon training and patient counseling initiatives, and you coupled that with a growing library of really compelling standalone clinical data like the TREY data we just discussed, you end up with a really viable playbook that enables our eye care professionals to better treat more patients with OMNI, whether that’s at the time of cataract surgery or as a standalone procedure.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question will come from Cecilia Furlong of Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Great. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions and congrats on the quarter. I wanted to start just with the implied 4Q guidance, if you could talk through really what’s the underlying structure includes from Surgical Glaucoma OMNI versus SION contribution starting to ramp? And then, as you think about 2023, you’ve talked about previously kind of a 30% or so outlook for the business from a growth standpoint, but how are you thinking about that today, and then really just the contributions OMNI versus SION as we think about 2023?

Yeah. Hi, Cecilia, it’s Jesse. And I’ll take the second part of that first. It’s really in the launch to provide sort of much specific feedback like particularly in a form like this, like on SION’s contribution. So we’re being conservative about it. We indicate we’ve trained over 120 surgeons on it just in the third quarter, which is really kind of like 5 weeks of a soft launch. So that’s shows a very healthy amount of interest, and we think that the physician feedback on the instrument is pretty tremendous. So we are excited, but we – it’s kind of called a new segment for us a bit, and so we’re just being sort of conservative in our perspectives, and then providing any real specifics on what the contribution of that might be. So, at the end of the day really what’s embedded in the fourth quarter to be a little boring, but like is really the continuation of the trends that we see dominated by OMNI in terms of new customer acquisition, there was nice utilization uplift in the third quarter and customer retention, Right. It was – Q3 is a funky quarter, right, like July and most of August are generally a bit soft, but it’s really just based on what we saw, called second half of the quarter and really like throughout the whole quarter, right, and that continuing into Q4 and beyond. And then on the 30%, Cecilia, we’re not providing guidance at this point, but that is a number we remain very comfortable with. There are a number of growth drivers as we’ve discussed that with real momentum heading into next year, SION included. And we think sort of the core are leading indicators of growth in terms of trained surgeons, ordering facilities, and retention stats were all quite positive in the third quarter.

Hi, Cecilia. And just add to that on the OMNI and SION question time. Just to be crystal clear, OMNI remains our flagship makes device, and I think that will always be the case, it’s got a very, very compelling efficacy profile. And the reality is the vast majority of the MIGS mark, and certainly, all of the MIGS expansion opportunities. Those are going to be efficacy driven, that’s where OMNI’s got a very tight and product market fit. SION is very distinct. It serves very separate and distinct subsets of the market things, parts of the market where OMNI frankly doesn’t have the best product market fit areas where efficacy might not be the top priority and things like efficiency, and ease, and speed may take priority. And there are 3 very distinct subsets, again, they’re not, the subsets don’t overlap with OMNI. One is the high volume cataract surgeons that’s prioritizing speed of procedure and efficiency. Number two are MIGS fellows in training. So think about academic institutions where fellows are learning MIGS for the first time goniotomy is kind of known as the training wheels of MIGS. So SION’s got a really nice offering for those folks who are in training. And then the last subset is facility profitability, right? I think about the private equity owned type facilities, where profitability is one of the main drivers; goniotomy is one of the more profitable procedures. So in those distinct subsets of the market, OMNI doesn’t have the strongest product market fit. OMNI does have the strongest product market fit, where comprehensive procedures and differentiated efficacy are paramount. We believe that SION customers, they open up – they open the door for us to new surgeon customers. And we have the opportunity then when we’ve got the SION relationship to them sell OMNI over time. So we think that actually SION can expand our OMNI market by opening doors that today aren’t the easiest doors open.

Thank you. And if I could follow-up to, I appreciate the commentary on OpEx. Just curious if you provide a bit more color in terms of R&D priorities, both near-term as well as over the intermediate-term you talked about previously next gen OMNIs and other pipeline products as well as clinical trials just as we’re thinking about 2023. How we should be thinking about just the contributions from an R&D standpoint across those initiatives?

Yeah. So, Cecilia, on pipeline, we’re obviously – we love innovation at Sight, I think, we’ve proven that we’re good at it. And we’re excited about next year releasing next gen OMNI in the first quarter early feedback from some surgeons, who we’ve received feedback from has been very positive. We think that’s going to be a very nice welcome addition to the MIGS market next year. We also have an exciting next generation of TearCare, TearCare MGX that we’re excited to get out next year. And then beyond that, beyond MIGS and MGD procedures we do as we’ve discussed in the past, we are in deep R&D and do intend to bring to market a broad pipeline of innovative products that hopefully one day we’ll address every step of the way for the patient journey and the eye care provider journey taking care of these patients. These are chronic diseases, lifelong diseases, they don’t have a cure, and we expect to innovate. Just like we’ve done with OMNI with TearCare, and now with SION, I think we’re fortunate, I think we’re three for three here, and we’re looking forward to sharing more about the stuff that we’re working on next year.

And Cecilia, half of the R&D line item, right, that you see for us is clinical, right? So other major products – projects that will be in our R&D investment envelope next year are SAHARA and PRECISION those trials, right, which are obviously very important to us.

Great. Thank you for taking the questions.

Thanks, Cecilia.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And the next question will come from David Saxon of Needham & company. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon, Paul and Jesse, thanks for taking my questions. Maybe, one for Paul, one for Jesse. Paul to Cecilia’s question around SION, you talked about the SION launch strategy 3-pronged, just wondering if you could tell us, which buckets are seeing the most traction launch today. And based off, the script it sounds like some SION users are being introduced to OMNI, which is great to hear, especially, so early on. Are you seeing anything about the reverse where OMNI users are starting to bridge some of their volumes to SION?

Hi, David, great questions. On the first question around SION, reality where we’re seeing adoption across all 3 of those subjects, we knew before we develop SION, we knew these market subsets existed. We’ve got obviously a significant and highly talented commercial team, sales and marketing team. And these subsets of the market are known to us, these were not accounts that we could win regardless of how efficacious OMNI is. They weren’t accounts that were available to us. They are today. So the answer is all 3 of those subsets, we’re having progress with SION to the high volume cataract surgeon, we brought on a number of those, I think, within the first few weeks, I mean, think of like some of the very highest volume cataract surgeons in the country, I know, we have some of those who came on early. The academic institutions, those institutions take time, right, to get products through the system. But we’re having very healthy discussions there today. And then lastly, on the PO – profitability oriented facilities, we’re selling SION into those types of accounts today. Your second question, David, OMNI users…

Yeah, Paul, I can take that we – the OMNI utilization of the initial SION orders looks very similar to the OMNI utilization overall, David, if that makes sense, right? Like meaning there’s not a discernible difference that we can observe yet like in their utilization trends versus the non-SION, but OMNI using base. And we’re really encouraged, right? It’s been a very targeted initial rollout. And, we knew that the use case really might have some overlap, but honestly, the reason that users were using OMNI was such that like it mitigated the theoretical risk of sort of the utilization cannibalization, right? So we are quite encouraged with that comparison of utilization.

Another way to think of that, David…

Okay. Got it.

Another way to think of that is our OMNI customers, who are proficient with OMNI, and they’re now, there is a bar, the efficacy bar and expectation has been set that they’re not going to move off of that. That’s why they’re using OMNI, whereas so OMNI customers don’t necessarily become SION customers. However, the opposite SION customers, we do have the opportunity to introduce them to OMNI once they’re using SION, we’ve got that established regular sales rep to surgeon relationship, and they’re in the OR with the surgeons. And then, they’re seeing patients that are a little more advanced that’s the ideal opportunity now that we’re in there to sell them on OMNI, so we don’t see it the other way around OMNI. Very, very happy OMNI users, who depend on the efficacy that OMNI delivers switching off of OMNI really to anything else.

Okay, great. And then, Jesse, maybe just one on the cash burn looks like it was around $21 million for the quarter, $61 million year-to-date. How should we think about the burn in the fourth quarter? And it sounds like should improve in 2023. So maybe just give us a framework with – how to think about the magnitude of that improvement as we progress to positive free cash flow in 2025? Thanks so much.

Yeah, I mean, the – I think we’ve given a lot of good piece parts to be able to kind of give our view, right? We gave a directional, I’d say, a true directional sort of view of what the operating expense envelope should look like next year, our perspective on medium-term revenue growth, right? And then, we are seeing margins like the gross margins, right? I think the three periods. It was 84% for all three periods, right? That I had discussed in sort of my prepared comments. So you sort of factor all those three things in without sort of giving specific cash burn guidance, but you can get to like what our perspective is like on what the burn envelope will be like next year, right? And what’s important to like in those comments was, we’ve made a lot of the investment, we think to grow the business to next $50 million, $100 million in terms of infrastructure investment, support investment. And we think this OpEx envelope scales very nicely with much less variable OpEx like for the next $50 million, $100 million of growth, then we have kind of – then we have experienced as we’ve invested heavily like in the recent past. And so that’s why we continue to convey conviction about our balance sheet and ability to hit our growth objectives within that balance sheet.

Got it. Thanks, then congrats on the quarter.

Thanks again.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question will come from Tom Stephan of Stifel. Your line is open.

Great. Hey, guys. Thanks for the questions. Maybe if I can start on reimbursement with the canaloplasty professional fee cut for next year, I believe, recently finalized. Maybe you can provide just general thoughts or views around the volume impact in 2023 from these changes. And then, I guess, on top of that, what are your thoughts on price and gross margins next year in that same context?

Yeah. Hey, Tom, happy to take that one. So canaloplasty CPT-66174 as we’ve discussed in the past, I think, 2 years ago, the raw [ph] RVU process revalued canaloplasty 66174, as well as trabecular bypass stenting on the 66174 pro fee side. They proposed a 2-year reduction in the pro fee from the historical rate of 900 plus to 750 this year, down to about 600 next year starting on January 1. So, while this is never welcome for surgeons, ophthalmologists, they’ve been experiencing reimbursement cuts on things like cataract surgery for many, many years now, so it’s certainly not good news in terms of our business, and in terms of doctors decisions to use OMNI, we don’t see an impact there. And the reason why I say that is the relative positioning of the pro fee, so moving from 750 to 600, again, it’s not welcome news. But it doesn’t change the level of reimbursement relative to any competing procedures. I think about goniotomy has had the highest pro fee that’s SION, for example. And it’s still well until that procedure is revalued in due course. The stents got revalued, so a reduced 66174 fee isn’t going to change the relatively better pro fee compared to stents in cataract. So we think that as you try to assess the impact of any of these changes on utilization, obviously, you think about, number one, relativity; and then number two, in a vacuum, does the pro fee going forward sufficiently reimburse the provider that they’ll continue doing these procedures? And we think that the answer is yes. So, doctors are used to using OMNI, they rely on OMNI for its efficacy, we have a very sticky business. And we don’t see a pro fee change from 750 to 600 taking us, of course.

Yeah, on pricing and margin – pricing time is really driven by the facility fee, which for 66174 actually went up. We’re always cognizant of margin pressures. I think, once SION becomes a more prominent contributor to our revenue mix, as that gets production scale, right, might be a very modest amount of pressure on our overall Surgical Glaucoma margins, right? But ultimately, we don’t feel like sort of there’ll be any cause and effect of price pressure, just given how pricing is really set in the market based on professional fee.

Got it. That’s great color. And then my follow-up just on TearCare, Paul, you talked about the SAHARA readout, I think, by 2H 2023. Maybe sort of at that time, let’s say, the superiority endpoint were to hit. What can we expect maybe over the next 6 to 12 months after that? It’d be great if you could just refresh us kind of on the longer-term market access strategy would be very helpful? Thanks, guys.

Yeah, sure. Thanks, Tom. A couple considerations, again, it completed enrollment in August, September timeframe. The readout or the randomization TearCare versus Restasis read out primary endpoints, that’ll be late Q2, so maybe summer 2023, we’ll have the data analyzed and ready for that readout. And then beyond that, assuming – knock on wood assuming success, we would begin – we want to publish the data, we’ll try to publish certainly the 6-month data. And then we continue – the study is not over at that point, it will continue for 2 years. There’s another read out at 2 years. The two goals of the study just to remind everybody: one, we want to assess how TearCare compares to Restasis at 6 months on signs and symptoms; and then the second goal of this study is to show durability of treatment effects. That’s why we’re running a 2-year trial with [indiscernible] that’s an eternity in the world of dry eye clinical trials. But again, this study was informed by payors themselves. We spoke to a number of payor medical directors before we designed and began executing this study, and those were the two things they needed to see. They need to see how does the interventional procedure for MGD compared to costly daily market leading prescription Rx? And number two, how long does TearCare last? What is the durability of treatment effect, because payors are going to want to decide if we’re covering this? How many treatments per year are we paying for it? And based on the 1,000s and 1,000s of cases we’ve done successfully commercially today in the cash pay world. We typically see one to two treatments in the first year and then a single treatment for maintenance every year thereafter. So we would – Tom, it’s a long answer those. Those are the goals of the study. We would begin having, hopefully again assuming success, very healthy discussions with payors with that 6-month data. We’re not going to wait for the 2-year endpoint in late 2024. We’re going to go with that 6-month endpoint and talk to as many payors as we can. And, I think, hopefully we’ll be able to pull in some payor wins and advances of that 2-year 2024 final readout.

Perfect. Thanks, Paul.

Thanks.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question will come from Craig Bijou of Bank of America. Your line is open.

Good afternoon, guys. Thanks for squeezing me in here. Just one for me. I believe, you guys said that you’re seeing uplift on standalone utilization in certain markets, and maybe you bring those best practices to other markets. I was hoping you can expand a little bit and maybe on the characteristics of that market is there anything that’s common that you’re seeing, and why standalone is seeing a little bit more uptick? And then maybe just a little bit more color on how you plan to kind of take those best practices and bring them to your other markets?

Craig, I’ll talk about the GCC is what we’ve seen. We’ve seen the most successful GCC, historically, the way we were organized prior to our re-org, the GCCs were more or less on an independent team with a mission to go and educate, educate our army surgeons, educate the referring provider community, et cetera. But they were operating more independently. What we saw, again, we’re learning very quickly, we’re paying close attention to what’s working. And then we’re trying to institutionalize as best practices, we’re doing that I think very well, right now. We saw that the GCCs, who are working most closely with the local surgical sale [ph], that they were able to effect faster, better, higher quality education of the entire surgical ecosystem, right, that surgical rep had already cultivated, and with the GCC and the rep working closely together. The GCC was better able to go and educate the important referring providers, educate the types of OMNI surgeons that were more likely to be ready to go sooner. And so it’s through that very tight collaboration between GCC and surgical sales rep that more efficient higher yield better quality standalone market development was happening. So what we’ve done is we’ve taken that entire 20 member GCC team and recently integrated them entirely within the surgical sales infrastructure. And we’re super excited now to replicate what we saw was already happening in a handful of territories, where we were seeing better productivity on standalone market development and better uplift there. We think that we’re institutionalizing it now with the GCC is under the leadership of the regional directors on our salesforce. And we expect now, those other territories to follow soon.

Got it. One follow-up. I mean any timing – or I mean expected timing on how quickly you think that you can see some uptick in other territories?

I think.

We – yeah, go ahead, Paul.

I think we’re seeing standalone uptick now, I mean, if you just some barometers. It’s hard to track with any accuracy, again, it’s OMNI, right? It’s the same device. We don’t have a combo cataract device and a standalone device. OMNI has a very broad indication for combo cataract and standalone and at a severity of disease. So it’s tricky. It’s tricky to track in that way, because it’s the same device. But based on, first of all, our performance and our growth, I think, it gets all rolled up into that. So we can expect that to continue. And then, just the discussions we’re having – we have a large commercial infrastructure and the discussions we’re having with our surgeon customers and the awareness of standalone that we’re driving and the feedback from our customers on standalone and the way that we’re training doctors today from the get-go [ph], when they do their first 10 cases, we’re institutionalizing some best practices, we’ll do 7 combo cataract cases and 3 standalone cases if possible. So those are the kinds of things that are happening with increasing frequency. It’s tangible to us. The chatter amongst the surgeon community around standalone continues to grow. And, I think, all of those things are very good barometers of standalone market development, standalone progress, in an area that’s otherwise tricky to assess with any – like right now any real accuracy again, because the product OMNI is the same successful product and combo cataract isn’t standalone.

Got it. Thanks for the color, guys.

Sure.

Thank you. And I see no further questions in the queue. I’d now like to turn the conference back to Paul Badawi for closing remarks.

Well, thank you, Chris, and thank you all. I appreciate everyone’s continued interest in Sight Sciences. I appreciate your time. I hope everyone is well. And have a great rest of your day.

Thank you. This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect. And have a pleasant day.