Edward K. Christian
Analyst
We're hopeful that we could do okay in the second quarter. Thanks, Sam. You know what? It appears, from what we're seeing right now in the releases from the other companies, we're kind of marching in lockstep with the other broadcasting companies.
Well, we did perform well if not better than most of our peers in Q1. But it is the same for us as others. Most markets were up. A few were flat and a few down but not materially down, more kind of a shortfall. We'll get into that in a second.
In revenue reporting markets, we have 6 of those, we outperformed the markets in 5 of our 6 major markets. One market reported negative growth. That was Norfolk, the whole market. While we were up 3.4%, the market itself was down 3.7%. We were up, they were down. In the other markets, they were all up. That would be, like, Columbus and Milwaukee and Des Moines. But this was a down market in Norfolk. The market is experiencing a pricing problem there with other stations, which has accounted for negative growth. We've still been able to command above-market rates, which has mitigated for our growth, by the way. And the numbers that I'm talking about for the markets are for the entire quarter.
We are very pleased, as Sam said, with the integration of WLVQ in Columbus, and the revenues there are returning quickly to previous historic levels that they have not seen for years. Harrisonburg has come online and, after a few conversion issues, has returned to a growth performance.
Our TV sector is a much smaller part of our portfolio and, as Sam mentioned, was not affected by political in Q1 due to the location of the markets.
We have not paid down additional debt as our leverage is below 1x. And with that said, there is always the temptation to pay down debt. Not necessarily become a debt-free company, but we're looking at that. Isn't that right, Sam?