Ole Hjertaker
Analyst · Citi. Please go ahead
Thank you, and welcome everyone to Ship Finance International, our first quarter conference call. With me here today I have our CFO, Aksel Olesen; and Senior Vice President, Andre Reppen. I will start by briefly going through the highlights for the quarter and following that, Mr. Olesen will run us through the financials and as the operator indicated the call will be concluded by opening up for questions. Before we begin our presentation, I would like to note that this conference call will contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, estimates or similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our current plans and expectations and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause future activities and results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ include conditions in the shipping, offshore, and credit markets. For further information, please refer to Ship Finance's reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. This is our 64th -- 61st quarter with profits and dividends and the dividends represents $1.40 per share on an annualized basis or nearly 11% dividend yield based on the closing price yesterday. Over the years, we have now paid more than $25 per share in dividends or more than $2.1 billion in total and we have a fixed rate charter backlog of $3.8 billion, which should support continued dividend capacity going forward. The reported net income for the quarter was approximately $34 million or $0.31 per share. This is from total charter revenues of around $160 million, primarily from vessels employed on time charter and includes a small profit split on the tankers. The EBITDA equivalent cash flow in the quarter was approximately $125 million. And last 12 months, the EBITDA equivalent has been approximately $480 million. The last 12 months have been very active in multiple transactions. We have grown our backlog by more than $1.3 billion and seen a major change in the fleet mix. As a consequence of this, the EBITDA is up 25% compared to the same period last year. During the first quarter, we have agreed to extend the charters for two 5,800 TEU container vessels by five years, but added a purchase obligation at the end. In addition, four 4,100 TEU vessels were extended by two years. All these vessels are chartered on bareboat basis to MSC. Subsequent to quarter end, we have also agreed to extend the charters for four 8,700 TEU container vessels, chartered on time charter basis to Maersk and these charters will now expire in 2024 and 2025. Combined, these adjustments added more than $170 million to a fixed rate backlog and our aggregate backlog stands on the same level as at the end of the previous quarter. Following the high deal flow in the fourth quarter, the first quarter was more of a housekeeping quarter for us, with several of the near-term debt maturities were addressed. We paid down a Norwegian krone denominated bond loan as Mr. Olesen will discuss later and we have virtually no further refinancings due until mid 2020. I would also like to highlight our position relating to the new maritime regulations, focused on reducing pollution at sea to be implemented in 2020. In order to be able to continue using lower cost high sulphur fuel oil or so called HSFO from 2020, vessels will have to be upgraded with exhaust gas scrubbers. The alternative is to use more expensive low-sulphur fuel and based on the forward curve, we see today, price difference is currently priced at around $200 per ton next year. Depending on vessel size and scrubber configuration, a scrubber installation may cost from $2.5 million to $7 million per vessel, which is a significant expense, particularly for smaller vessels. But payback could be short at the current spread levels, particularly for the larger vessels. For vessels on bareboat and time charter, our customers pay for the fuel and will therefore benefit from the savings in fuel cost by installing a scrubber unless we agree to a profit share arrangement. For vessels in the spot market, the benefit will go to us. Given the added revenue potential for vessels with this equipment, we also expect that it will positively impact vessel valuations. Currently 25 vessels in our fleet are scheduled to be upgraded with scrubbers, primarily in the container sector, but also on larger crude oil tankers and dry bulk vessels. Based on discussions with our customers, this number may increase going forward. For the vessels on long term charters, most of these investments will be covered by our charterers, but in some instances we may look at funding such investments against an adjustment to the charter rate generating a proper return on our capital or alternatively a profit sharing model, where we fund all or a part of the installation in exchange for an appropriate share of the gains of using lower cost fuel. We have also agreed to install scrubbers on -- for our own cost of benefit on our two Suezmax crude oil tankers. From our side, upgrading vessels or scrubbers is as much a defensive move than an offensive. Worst case, if price difference should be smaller than analysts project and what is priced in the current forward curve, it may not be as profitable as one could hope for. But if there is a real market disruption as some things that will be the gains could be formidable with very short payback time on the equipment and corresponding increase in asset values. And another benefit is the expected higher number of vessels out of service due to these upgrades, which should lead to a firmer market at most segment everything else equal. Analysts estimate up to 3,000 vessels to be upgraded which scrubbers over the next 12 months and it could take three to four weeks out of service to do the job. Currently, our capital commitments are limited to $26 million, but could increase over the next few months. Given the increased expected charter hire, we believe a significant portion of such investments can be financed and thereby limit our own net investments. Following the recent charter extensions or charter backlog now stands at approximately $3.8 billion. The bulk of transactions last year was related to container vessels so the liner segment now represents more than 50% of our backlog, up from around 38%, 12 months ago. Our focus in the liner segment has primarily been on new design container vessels between 9,000 TEU and 19,000 TEU and we continue to see opportunities in the segment, as illustrated by the two acquisition in 2018, adding $1.3 billion to the backlog. In addition to the charter extensions mentioned earlier, we also recently chartered out two car carriers to Glovis for a 12 month period. Due to the relative shorter nature of this charter, it is not included in the backlog figures. Up until 2017, the offshore segment was our largest segment for long period, but it is now down to 26% of our charter backlog down from 34% only one year ago. And as if you can see from the Slide on Page 5, the backlog is only half of the backlog from the liner segment. SFL received full charter hire on the drilling rigs on charter two Seadrill during the restructuring in that company, which enabled us to significantly reduce our financial exposure to the rigs in that period. We have agreed to temporarily reduce other charter hire by 30% until 2022 with a catch-up thereafter. And in the meantime, we will continue to generate strong net cash flow from these assets, due to significantly reduced leverage and corresponding lower debt service costs. Seadrill has sub-chartered the harsh environment jack-up rig West Linus to ConocoPhillips until the end of 2028. The harsh environment semi-submersible rig West Hercules has recently been awarded multiple consecutive sub-charters in the North Sea and is now working for Equinor and including the West Linus, we have reduced the debt from $1.9 billion initially on the Seadrill rigs to less than $650 million currently and of this aggregate outstanding loan balance only $266 million is currently guaranteed by SFL. On the dry bulk side, we have 22 vessels in the fleet with 13 larger vessels chartered out on long-term basis and seven Handysize vessels and two Supramax bulkers traded in the spot market. One of our long-term objectives is to combine stability and predictability in cash flows with optionality and we have seen over time that market volatility can generate super returns from time-to-time. We have a 33% profit split on top of the base rate of $17,600 plus interest adjustment or around $18,000 -- $18,600 currently. This is above current market levels and we did not earn a profit split this quarter, but there are still many quarters left on the charter and there could be good opportunities to earn profits split down the road. The kamsarmaxes and most of the supramaxes are all on long-term fixed rate time charters while the seven Handysized dry bulk carriers continue to trade in the spot market due to the two of the Supramax bulkers. The rates achieved this quarter for the Handysize vessels were approximately $5,900 for trading day, which was down from approximately $8,500 per day in the previous quarter. For the tankers, in the first quarter, the crude oil tanker markets benefited from high fourth quarter rate levels and good charter coverage going into the quarter. Rates across the segment fell slightly through the quarter and part of the reason for that was a number of new buildings that were delivered in the period. Rates did pick up again and towards the end of the quarter, but softened again subsequent to quarter end. But despite the relatively soft market, the share price of many tanker companies have surged lately. We believe that is partly due to the expectations of the effects of the implementation of the IMO 2020 regulations, which is expected to drive both increased demand and tightening supply in the segment and market analysts expect a positive sentiment going into the third and the fourth quarter of the year. In the first quarter, the remaining VLCCs on charter to -- from Frontline Shipping Limited generated around $27,600, an average per day, which was above the base rate. So a profit split of approximately $1 million was accumulated. In addition to the VLCCs, we also have exposure to the crude oil tanker market through our two modern Suezmax tankers, which are traded in the pool with sister vessels owned by Frontline. For these vessels, the average charter rate in the quarter was approximately $25,700 per day, which was up from the $17,500 in the previous quarter. And lastly, I would like to highlight that in the first quarter 62% of revenues derived from time chartered vessels, while only 38% derived from bareboat chartered vessels and rigs, which may be a surprise to many. We believe we can offer superior service of flexibility to our customers, giving our access to more deal flow, than if you focused on one operating mode only. And with that, I will give the word over to our CFO, Aksel Olesen, who will take us through the numbers for the quarter.