Ladies and gentlemen, We'd like to thank you for standing by. And welcome to the SEI First Quarter Earning Teleconference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we'll conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, today's conference call will be recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Chairman and CEO, Mr. Al West. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning everybody, and thank you for joining us this morning. All of our segment leaders are on the call, as well as Dennis McGonigle, SEI's CFO; and Kathy Heilig, SEI's Controller. I am going to start by recapping the first quarter, and I will then turn it over to Dennis, first to expand on a few financial matters including our SIV disclosure, and to cover LSV in the investment new business segment. After that, each of the business segment leaders will comment on the results of their segments. Then Finally, Kathy Heilig will provide you with some important company wide statistics. As usual, we will field questions at the end of each report. So, let me start with the first quarter. First quarter earning sales, 23% from the year ago on a revenue growth of 3%; diluted earnings per share of the quarter $0.25 represents a 19% drop from the $0.31 reported for the first quarter of 2007. Our earnings for the quarter were adversely affected by our first quarter charged to earnings of $25.8 million, or approximately $0.08 per share. This was due to a further drop in the market prices of commercial paper of certain Structured Investment Vehicles, or SIVs held in three of our money plants. This is a SIV situation we addressed in our third quarter 10-Q and the special investor call we had at that time. And we also addressed the issue in our fourth quarter 2007 earnings call. Now, Dennis will further update you on the SIV situation in a few minutes. Our modest growth in revenues for the quarter is a result of fees from new clients across whole of our segments. And now while we experience a solid new business quarter, these gains were substantially offset by weaknesses in capital markets.…

Thanks Al. Good morning everyone. I will provide an update on the capital support agreements that we have discussed at lengths in our 10-K filing and on our prior two calls, and their impact on our earnings. I will then briefly cover the first quarter results for the investments in new business and LSV segments. As you are aware from our fourth quarter call and 10-K filing, SEI entered into capital support agreements with three SEI money market mutual funds, back in the fourth quarter of 2007. Among other money market instruments, the funds hold senior notes issued by Structured Investment Vehicles or SIVs, some of which have either seized making payments, or potentially may seize making payments on its outstanding notes on the schedule maturity dates. As you will recall from our filings in October, 2007 in our recent 10-K filing, S&P advised SEI that it would place any mutual fund that had AAA rating and owned certain SIVs on credit watch with negative implications unless the fund was provided credit support having an A-1 short-term rating by S&P. Although we were not obligated to provide the credit support, in order to avoid our credit watch by S&P on our funds and to address the need of customers, SEI entered into the capital support agreements. We entered into similar agreements with two other funds. Under these agreements, as of March 31, 2008, we are committed to provide up to an aggregate of $162.5 million of capital into the funds, if a fund realizes a loss on its covered SIV holdings, so that the net asset value per share of the fund will be less than 0.995, or in the case of one fund, 0.9975. We provided detail about this arrangement in our annual 10-K filing, and we encourage you…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Murali Gopal of KBW. Please go ahead, sir. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Good morning Dennis.

Hi Murali. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Just a quick question on the SIV notes; I know you had a whole bunch of notes maturing at the end of March, and I am just wondering how much of that matured in how much went into receivership or can you just update us on what's the current total exposure to the SIV notes?

Sure. I mean we've had... we did have some maturities in March just to give you, I guess a little more historical background. Since this began, we started with holdings of roughly $1.4 of these types securities back in let's say the end of September and October. About 800 million of that has matured in March and I guess in the first quarter if you will about 240 million matured of that number. So, we have seen a lot these securities that we held from the beginning mature. We currently have about 600 million of par value. We still hold about 600 million of par value of these securities and the bulk of which actually is made up of Cheyne and Victoria, the ones that are we have already recognized as a problem. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay, thank you.

Our next question in queue comes from the line of Tom McCrohan of Janney Montgomery. Please go ahead.

Hi Dennis.

Hi Tom.

The Cheyne and Victoria SIV, can you remind us what the underlying collateral is for those SIVs and when these non-cash charges that we are taking... you are taking around the quarter. Is it because the collateral is not performing or is it still kicking off cash or is there some other reason why the net asset value is being impacted?

Generally, the information we have been able to get tells us that the underlying collateral is performing. The payments are being made on that collateral. It's really just the overall market conditions that are driving down the market evaluations or assessments of market evaluation of that... all those underlying collateral instruments. And the big issue is liquidity in the market that's having part of biggest impact on pricing. I think in... if you look at Cheyne for example in most recent information we had, which is early April, about 82% of the portfolio is AA or better on the underlying collateral, about 89% is A or better. So the ratings although have, I guess in aggregate have gone down slightly, there is still fairly highly rated positions. And Victoria, it's similar, 81% is AA or better and about 92% is A or better. So the underlying collateral seems to be holding up. It doesn't mean there is not in charge of hard line of sight, we really can't get to the absolute underlying single mortgage that Mrs. Roberts has it in [ph] Ohio than maybe, one of the assets to tell four ladders down here. But the information we are getting is still somewhat encouraging.

Any metric on like loan to value or FICO scores or anything like that connection with the mortgage of supporting both of the SIVs?

Again when you try to drill down on these types of securities to get all the one down to the actual underlying mortgage, it's quite a challenge.

Fair enough. Well, thanks for taking the question, and your comments were very helpful, thanks.

Verywelcome thanks.

Our last question in queue on this topic is comes from the line of Justin Hughes of Philadelphia Financial. Please go ahead.

Good morning, most of my question have been answered, but you said two follow-up questions. Do you know if there first lean mortgages or is there seconds or HELOC or subprime?

Again getting all the way down to that level of detail is not somewhat challenging.

Okay, and then secondly it look likes you've taken about 10% accrual rates, well, if you include the mark-to-market today, $61 million on your $600 million of exposure. What data point did you use to price those, is there an open liquid market for these?

When it comes to securities that as followed mainly, as I've said in the past Cheyne and Victoria been a larger holdings we have, really is a fair value pricing.

How do you determine fair value?

We work with our sub-advisor Columbia Asset Management, a subsidiary Bank of America. And they have a fair value model that we rely on.

Okay, so it would be like... it would be considered a level three if it's in a broker dealer. You are estimating the value as there is no liquid market fees.

Correct

Okay, thank you.

You are welcomed.

[Operator Instructions]. There are no further questions in queue at this time. Panelists, please continue.

Thank you, I would now like to cover the investments in new business segment and the LSV segment. Activities in the investments and new business segment are focused on direct marketing to ultra-high net worth investors. During the quarter, investments in the new business segments generated a loss of $2.8 million. This compares to a loss of $3.2 million for the first quarter of 2007. The efforts in this segment continue to be centered on learning, developing, and delivering our life and wealth services to be ultra-high net-worth segments. The learning we gain and the services we developed from this process are then leveraged applicable to other assets distribution units in the company. As you know, SEI historically has used the investments in new business segment as an incubator for new initiatives. We view the losses in this segment as an investment in future market opportunities and/or services. You can expect losses in this segment to continue. I will now turn to LSV. We continue to own approximately 43% of LSV asset management. LSV gives a market volatility had a challenging quarter of financial performance. Earnings contribution to SEI from LSV was approximately $30 million in the first quarter 2008. This compares to a contribution of $31.3 million in the first quarter of 2007. This year-over-year decrease was due primarily to a loss of assets from market depreciation. During the first quarter, LSV's net assets shrank approximately $5.8 billion. We expect LSV to continue to be challenged by these volatile markets. However their investment process is well tested and their long-term performance record is strong. This should help them recover when the market settle down. Revenues from LSV for the quarter were approximate $77.3 million. This compares to revenues of $81.2 million for the first quarter of 2007 and $82.2 million in the forth quarter of 2007. Revenues were impacted by asset declines as discussed earlier. On SEI's balance sheet of our reported cash and short-term investment of approximately $336 million, $78 million is attributable to LSV at March 31st 2008. Our reported receivables of $282 million; $87 million were attributable to LSV. Liabilities are affected by the debt associated with our guarantee to the LSV employee group. This has reflected in both current liabilities of approximate $10.9 million and long-term debt of approximate $39 million. I will now take any questions you may have on the investments and new business or LSV segments. Question And Answer

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question in queue comes from the line of Glenn Greene of Oppenheimer. Please go ahead

Thanks; good morning, Dennis.

Hi Glenn.

Can you just talk about on the performance of LSV just sort of the asset flows, sort of just talking about the market performance versus the inflows over outflows?

Yes, there are... yes, asset losses in the first quarter that was pretty much 100% market depreciation. There are... clients flows were essentially flat. So, they are taking new clients money in as in the past, where they have closed on a lot of their products that gets our position now is already kind of selectively open.

So, that was my next question. Are they opening any of the funds that previously has been closed?

Yes, selectively.

Okay, thank you.

They have the capacity.

All right.

Our next question in queue comes from the line of Jeff Hopson of Stifel Nicolaus. Please go ahead. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay, I was going to ask the same thing about the products being open. So they are open, or they are not?

I said they are selectively open. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Selectively open.

Yes. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay, great.

We'll take new client money. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Great, Okay. Thanks a lot.

Our next question in queue comes from the line of Tom McCrohan of Janney Montgomery. Please go ahead.

Dennis, is there any particular front that seeing more underperformance than other front in LSV? I don't really know all the funds in detail. But if you can elaborate on the average value for the... 5% for the quarter, but they clearly were down more than to the market depreciation for the quarter. So, why would they underperforming the market depreciation this quarter? Maybe there are certain funds that are... a multiple of the market appreciation for whatever reason, if you can elaborate on that, that'll be helpful.

I think there are more than a large cap dive strategies with more impacted than some of their mid-cap and small cap products.

Okay, all right; so, there was some of that. And you folks, when you consolidated LSV back in early '06 because of the guarantee of the loan, is there any level of ownership, where this would be de-consolidated and you talked about that in UK and say potentially... if you consolidate this ownership draft to a certain percentage, if we don't really kind of elaborate on that certain percentages, so...

It's really when our risk of ownership drops below 50%. So, at the end of rule, that triggers a consolidation is more of a risk base room.

Okay.

Then technical ownership... actual ownership rule. And as you remember, we bet last transaction was about 8%, and just over 50% in total risk. So, once our risk drops below 50, that's when we would be consolidating.

This is associated with the outstanding loan, you mean?

Yes and/or any another shift in ownership.

Okay, because they are really paying down that loan pretty quickly, right?

They are paying it down, yes.

So you are getting pretty close to that risk, going below 50%.

It's really not a pro-rata, if you are thinking about in terms of a pro-rata event?

Yes.

It's not a pro-rata event on the loan, it's all or nothing.

Okay. Is there... could you quantify or speak to... is there a chances could be deconsolidated over the next 12 months?

No, I wouldn't say that's possible through the loan being repaid.

What... can we... maybe help us understand what events would then upside the loan being repaid with... because you consolidated because of the loan?

If we sold 10% of our holdings that would reduce our ownership by 4%, what not that we are not planning to; I am just saying that you are asking for what are other scenarios that would result in deconsolidation.

But before you have been provided a guarantee for the loan, on 43%, and it was deconsolidated. The event that consolidated was the loan, but now you are saying that deconsolidated your ownership as to drop 10% [ph].

Hi, Tom. The loan represented 8%. 8 plus 43 is 51; to the extend that the 51 in whatever way SIV perform drops below 50. That would result in our deconsolidation. You understand that? So, whether it's a 43 order drop or the 8% were to go away.

But does the 8% go away if you repay the loan?

Well, it will, yes.

So then you would drop below 50%.

Correct. But your question was this year, and my comment was it is highly unlikely that the loan will be repaid this year.

Got it. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Murali Gopal of KBW. Please go ahead. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Hey Dennis, I know you said the LSV funds are selectively open now, but can you give us an idea, is this more second quarter event or is this something that happened in the first quarter, and just in terms of timing when they started opening of the funds selectively?

It's more... I can't really say there is a firm date, where they hung out. I think it's just that they have actually moved into during the first quarter. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay. And just in terms of looking at the operating margin at LSV, it looks like it's held up pretty well. Is it more just a function of lower accrued compensation?

Yes, approximately there was a one-time expense in the first fourth quarter brought the margin down a little bit. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay, thanks.

I didn't repeat itself in the first quarter. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay. Thanks.

So, there is more timing on that than anything.

Our next question comes from the line of Glenn Greene of Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Yes, I actually had a very similar question to the previous one, but I was just trying to understand the expense flexibility on the LSV side if there is sort of natural buffers like the core SEI business model has given that sort of revenue drop 5 million sequentially, but profits barely dropped; so just trying to get some clarity on that.

Yes, little bit less of I think it also had to do with expenses in the fourth quarter.

How material is... were those one-time expenses in the fourth quarter?

Not that material to our earnings, Glenn.

But tell at least [ph].

Well, again they were material.

Okay, all right. Thank you.

There are no further questions in queue at this time. Panelists, please continue.

Thank you. And now I am going to turn it over to Joe Ujobai to discuss private banking segment, Joe?

Great; thank you Al. Today I would like to review our financials and give you an update on our market activity. As of financial update, revenue was just over a $107 million by 10% from the year ago quarter that decline approximately 4% from the fourth quarter of 2007. Revenue growth versus the year ago quarter was due to a net increase in assets under management from distribution partners, primarily in non-U.S. markets, as all as an increase in our recurring wealth processing revenue both in the U.S. and the UK. Revenue declines from the fourth quarter of 2007 was due to those market depreciation, as well as some high network client redemptions in our asset management business. I'd like to remind you that we also have relatively strong onetime revenues in our U.S. investment processing business in the fourth quarter of 2007. Average assets under management for the quarter were $19.6 billion, an increase of 10% from the year ago quarter, but a decline of $2.2 billion from the fourth quarter of 2007. The decline in average assets equaled approximately 50% in market appreciation, and 50% in net client redemptions. Profit increase from the year ago quarter by approximately 5.8% to $20.9 million. Profit declined by approximately 7.4% from the fourth quarter 2007 due to the declining revenue and a 3.5% increase in expenses. Increased expenses were primarily due to cost associated with a continued sales and marketing, build out maintenance and operational deployment of the Global Wealth Platform. This segment accounts for the majority of the overall expense of the platform. Margins for the quarter was 19.5%. As I had mentioned to in recent calls, margins will bounce around recent levels, as we expect to have continued pressure in this segment due to the launch of Global Wealth…

[Operator Instructions]. And our first question in queue comes from the line of Jeff Hopson of Stifel Nicolaus. Please go ahead. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Hi Joe. couple of questions here; the redemption activities that you saw in the quarter, is this the typical type of short-term behavior from clients as opposed to any permanent changes, how would you judge that? And then tell us a little bit about the discovery process that you are undertaking with private bank clients and how long typically that would take before potentially the next stage?

Okay; thanks, Jeff. The answer to your first question is this typical, we are relatively new, really the last three or four years that we have focused on distribution through non-U.S. or global clients thought banks that typically care to high net worth, ultra-high net worth investors. So I would say through ultra-high net worth investors to private banks outside of the U.S. we don't have a lot of experience with a down market or a more volatile market. And so I think what we are seeing is that some of our bank clients are some the end investors particularly once that invested more recently say in the 2006-2007 time frame that only saw sort of fairly significant upside of the markets have gotten a bit nervous and have typically pulled some of their money out of the longer-term markets. And so we believe that this is closely based on market sentiment, and our solutions are long-term valid strong investment solutions and we would expect to see as market sentiment changes and continue to increase in growth of our invest margin business to these distributors. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay.

As far as the discovery process goes, we are getting increasingly more inefficient in the discovery process particularly as the platform is up and running, and the processes are in place. And so the real activity behind the businesses discovery is to go into a prospect to be a private bank or one of these non-bank wealth mangers that I mentioned better understand their business strategy, better understand how they are currently transacting or running their business, and then identifying how we can take the set of services that we've built that are underpinned by the platform and line up that business model or move that business model towards the infrastructure that we built. And so we are getting more efficient at these. I would say that the first couple took six months to a year and we are actively working to lower that time period and do these things more quickly. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay, and the terms of your discussions, any sense of client reaction to the markets slow down of interest, pick-up of interest, anything you can give us there?

I would say that... our clients are ultimately invested managers with the private banks or these non-bank wealth mangers. So if you look at the banks obviously we all know the challenges that banks are facing world wide, and so that certainly can be distraction to making more strategic decisions, given what's happening with banks and credits. With the non-bank wealth managers, certainly those organizations are typically seeing the depreciation of their client assets given what's happening in the capital markets around the world. But I think that ultimately volatility will bode fairly well for us in the longer-term, because it really helps the banks get or the non-banks or any of these wealth managers get focused on their... the strategy of their business to gather more clients, to have a closer relationship with their clients, and really refocus their efforts on discretionary portfolio for their clients as well refocus their efforts on gathering new clients and away from infrastructure and the type of services that we can provide to them. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay; great, thanks.

Our next question in queue comes from the line Murali Gopal. Please go ahead. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Good morning, Joe.

Good morning. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Most of my question have been answered, but just quickly, in terms of building out these service infrastructure for the global wealth platform and the spending related to that, how far along you think you are in terms of the spending? Do you think the spending related to that is already peaked or you expect that to be some time in 2008?

We will continue to spend on the technology, they are the platform. We mentioned earlier some releases this year, which are around continued operational efficiency and scalability of the platform. So, we obviously overtime expect to add significant amount of business to the platform. So, once you continue out the infrastructure to scale, we talked about it significant release towards the end of the year around more asset management functionality. We do have to build out more U.S. functionality around taxes and connectivity in the U.S. market, and so we will continue to invest significantly in the platform this year and certainly in the next year. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay and in terms of your sales focus, when you are talking to your prospective clients especially in Europe, typically who do you see as a competitor that probably prospect of clients is looking at in addition to your Global Wealth Platform?

Atbanks, we see typically... at the large banks, we typically see sort of internal capability. So large goal of banks would have significant technology and operations resources internally that have often provided these infrastructure services to the private banks. I would say sort of the focus wealth manager, the private banks that are primarily focused on wealth management, they typically have in-house technology platforms that they acquired and are often legacy platforms that are quite old, and with some of these non-bank wealth managers, there has been an attempt over the last couple of years to piece together technology that's available in the market and they try to integrate that to work in this discretionary and moving more and more towards the model based solution. So, it's typically technology that these organizations are trying to integrate, then many of them haven't been very successful integrating these in a scalable manner. And so there's number of different competitors in-house versus buying technology, trying to get the custodians to do more for them around individual client management and now part of the process is a lot of these organizations are distracted by the market conditions and so a competitor is just the other issues facing the business. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Thank you.

There are no further questions in queue at this time. Panelists, please continue.

Thank you, Joe. Our next segment is investment advisors and Wayne Withrow will cover the segment. Wayne?

Thank you. Al. Revenues for the first quarter decreased $1 million with 2% from the year-ago period while our average assets on the management during the quarter were down $128 million or less than one half of 1% from the first quarter of 2007. The decline in revenue was more pronounced than our decline in our average assets under management due to a decrease in the average basis points we earn on our managed assets. I believe much of this decline reflected advisors and investors becoming more defensive in their portfolios as evidenced by a more than $1 billion increase in our money market balances for March 31st, 2007 to March 31st, 2008. The good news is we retained these assets even if they are in lower field products. Cash flow for the first quarter of 2008 was a negative $170 million. Disbursements totaled $1.83 billion and receives totaled $1.66 billion. Both historical... higher historical disbursements and lower historical receipts contributed to our negative cash flow. Investor uncertainty was evident in both of these totals. Profits for the quarter decreased 9% [ph] for the year-ago period. Lower profits were primarily the result of a decline in our revenues and increases in expenses associated with the global wealth platform. Now while investor uncertainty and declining markets have had a negative impact on our short-term financial results, our underlying business fundamentals remain strong. We continue to sign new advisors and our pipeline of activity continues to grow. In addition, we remain committed to growing our existing advisors with one example being the launch of the SEI million-dollar producer program during the first quarter. Over 60 high potential advisors are participating in this year long coaching program designed to help them increase new business development. Participants in this programs had been generating positive cash flow even in this challenging market environment. Also keep in mind that while uncertain markets may have short-term financial results challenging, they also allow us to reinforce the value of our outsourcing solution to advisors. Our tax management assistance proposal generation tools, marketing campaigns designed to calm, the worried and investor and our full array of portfolio strategies from aggressive to conservative are just some of the tools advisors can benefit from in these markets. This should leave us well positioned in the advisor marketplace. In summary, declining market valuations and investor uncertainty have had a negative impact on our first quarter financial results what we are using these negatives to strengthen our long-term potential. I will now entertain questions. Question And Answer

And our first question in queue comes from the line Jeff Hopson of Stifel Nicolaus. Please go ahead. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Hi Wayne. Can you remind us of what your goals would be in terms of new advisor, activity and then in this environment is it harder or easier to add advisors?

Well, your first question, I don't think we've set a specific goal, at least publicly, we have internal metrics. And I usually update everyone so that at the end of the year as to where we are into advisors. So, I don't think to give you a specific number for that. I will tell you in this environment, I think our ability to sign new advisors is not... is really unaffected by the market or maybe even a little bit more positive, because it's their challenge and their business equation. They are looking at different ways do their business and different ways to grow their business profitably and challenging markets are sort of a catalyst to have them look at that. You need to remember that outsourcing... our outsourcing solution is a different value proposition for advisors. So they need to be looking at different ways to do business, so generally this is... that's good. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay, great. Thanks a lot.

And we have a question from the line Murali Gopal. Please go ahead. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Good morning, Wayne.

Good morning. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Just very quickly in a tough revenue environment such as the first quarter, you had pretty good improvement in operating margin, which is kind of... little bit surprising. Can you just comment a little bit in terms of how... what lead to the improvement?

I don't know whether that we really had much improvement in the operating margins. I think actually our margins in the first quarter were a little bit lowered than our historical standards, which reflects the decline in the asset values or shift in the lower fee products and some increase in the some expense line. So that we reduced expense. If you look sequentially, we took $2 million in expenses out, which is the good news. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay.

The bad news is the decline in revenue was more pronounced than the decline in expenses. But we continue, as Al said to look at our expenses daily. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay. And just also very quickly, I know about a year back, you talked a little bit on the distribution focused investment strategies, and at that point you sounded pretty upbeat on the prospects of the strategy. Could you just provide us an update on where that stands, and what do you think about that?

Yes, I think that we are beginning to get traction on a distribution focus strategies in the market reception to that; product line is pretty good. So, if I gave this percentage increases, the numbers would be pretty phenomenal, but in terms of the overall, almost $40 billion in assets, it's still really insignificant as it reflects in our financial results. So, the jury is still out, it's continuing to grow month-over-month, but we really haven't reached a critical math yet. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay, thanks.

Our next question in queue comes from Tom McCrohan. Please go ahead.

Hi Wayne, are you seeing any directional changes in April as far as you are the RAA's [ph] client is getting more defensive.

I mean if you look sort of... try to look over three week period, I would say that the market uncertainty we saw in the first quarter has continued in the second quarter, and I thinks it's more the same for us.

When they get more defensive, assuming that means, they're putting something cash. Are you guys capturing that for your liquidity funds at line item in the asset balances?

Ask that again, Tom.

When these end clients get more defensive, I guess that assumes a strong equity has been grown into cash. And are you... the SEI capturing that cash investment?

Yes, we are. So if you look at, while our total assets were down, if you look at sequentially, our total assets were down, our liquidity assets sequentially were up 18%, if you look quarter end-to-quarter end

Yes.

We have all that in the earnings release, Tom. If you go back, it's been one [indiscernible] but we... but what you're pointing out is we are seeing that.

Great. So, typically there is not much leakage if end client of a registered investment advisor sell some large cap portfolio, goes into cash, then the cash are they going into like in SEI bond, right?

I think we are seeing a lot of clients move out of longer-term investments in the cash. Some may be leaving us, but we are also seeing if you look quarter-over-quarter Q1 to Q1, it's $1 billion increase and we are tapping those assets.

Great, thank you Wayne.

There are no further question in queue at this time. Gentlemen on the panel, please continue.

Thank you, Wayne. And our next segment is the Institutional Investors segment. I am going to turn it over to Ed Loughlin to discuss the segment. Ed?

Thanks Al, good morning everyone. The first quarter was a challenging business environment for the institutional segment. Record sales of $3.4 billion and help the new clients funding of $1.7 billion were essentially massed by the volatile and negative capital markets. I am going to first speak about the financial results for the first quarter compared to the year ago period, and due to the negative capital market, I am also going to touch on progress that we've made compared to the fourth quarter 2007, and then conclude with sales results. On the financial side, strong new client funding throughout the entire year has helped to dampen the impact of negative capital markets on revenue growth. Revenues approaching $51 million grew 9% compared to the first quarter of 2007. Revenues for the first quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2007, declined 4% despite strong new client fundings during the quarter. Profits for the first quarter increased 11% to over $20 million comparing favorably to the year ago period, but were essentially flat to the fourth quarter of 2007. Margins of 40.5% represent a slight increase for the quarter compared to both the year ago period and also the fourth quarter. Worldwide Institutional Asset balances were also negatively impacted by the capital markets. Assets decreased $1.2 billion to $48 billion in total, compared to the fourth quarter of 2007, despite the significant new client fundings. The backlog of committed, but unfunded sales was $2.8 billion at quarter's end. We anticipate the majority of the current backlog assets to fund during the second quarter. I am pleased to announce the record sales quarter of $3.4 billion in new client assets. A large industry wide pension plan in the Netherlands, totaling $1.6 billion was a significant new client this quarter. In addition, we were successful securing relationships with clients in all of our target markets. Changing pension regulations and accounting standards as well as the more complex investment environment continued to be positive catalysts for business growth and enable us to build a healthy pipeline. However, our past experiences tell us that negative volatile capital markets coupled with an uncertain business environment tends to lengthen the sales cycle and slow down institutional decision making. We continue executing on our long-term strategy of enhancing and extending the reach of our pension in a downward solution and also initiating new business discussions with perspective clients. These activities will serve us well in building the long-term growth and value of the business for SEI. Thank you very much and I am happy to entertain any question.

The first question in queue comes from the line Glenn Greene. Please go ahead.

Hi Ed, good morning.

Hi Glenn.

So, market factors aside you actually had a pretty astounding quarter from sales activity, and even if you could strip out sort of the one big client, you were certainly above trend. And certainly with a back up of sort of a challenging market in probably sales cycle being somewhat extended is there anything that sort of happening in your market, what sort of explains the sales success and do you thinks it's sort of sustainable or is it sort of an anomaly in the quarter?

Okay, I would say that what we continue to see, if you were to go back and look at the trend line, what we continue to see is continued market acceptance, okay, for the outsourcing proposition. We have globalized that activity over the last couple of years, so we are starting to see this to be something more than just in the U.S. So, I think that's all positive. I think the other thing that I've spoken about is the fact larger investors are seeing this as a very good alternative. So, we are certainly delighted with an investor of this size. This is not the largest investor that we have, which is probably the good news. It is probably the largest single decision, but we have other investors of this magnitude, where we have plans and multiple jurisdictions to the U.S, Canada the UK multiple locations. So, I think the trends are very positive for the offering that we have. But I would point out though that I think institutions and we've have seen this in the past, they are going to be focused probably on the impact of the environment on their business. And so I think for them to try to get to a better place for managing these pensions or doubt [ph] assets I think that sometimes takes the back seat to more pending business decisions. And so I think we might just see a slow down in decisions. But the good side of that trend is we have not seen a slow down in the willingness for prospects to take new business meetings. So the ability for us to continue to get meetings and to initiate new calling activity continues. So, I think that's the healthy sign.

What are the prospects for some other larger deals, going out of few quarters what not?

Well, I mean we have focused on large we have focused on our core, so we are trying to do as much as we possibly can to move all of these market segments that we are in forward.

Okay, thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Hopson. Please go ahead. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Hi there, Ed. Just a question from modeling purposes, typically newer or larger business might have lower fees attached to... is that a general rule that we should follow?

Yes, I mean as you know our fee schedule is such that the more asset that the client gives us, the lower their effective fee would be. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay.

So yes, that's correct. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay. And what were the actual fundings in the first quarter, did you give us that?

1.7 billion. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: 1.7 billion; okay, great. Thanks a lot.

Sure.

And the last question in queue at this time comes from the line of Murali Gopal. Please go ahead. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Good morning, Ed.

Good morning. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Just very quickly could you compare the growth trends that you are seeing in the U.S. versus non-U.S. market. Are you seeing a lot growth in terms of also the prospects more interest from non-U.S. prospects?

I guess I would suggest that the way you have to look at it is the U.S. market continues to be the biggest market opportunity on a world wide basis. So, proportional to the size of the market, I think we are seeing interest in all of these particular markets that we are operating in. So, I think I would probably send you down the wrong path if I were to talk about one being more interesting right now than another. It's pretty much a relationship to the size of the market opportunity that's how we see it kind of playing out. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay, thank you.

Sure.

There are no further questions in queue at this time, please continue.

Our final segment today is investor mangers, and I am going to turn it over to Steve Meyer to discuss the segment.

Thank you Al. Good morning everyone. The investment manager segment financial results for the first quarter of 2008 include a growth in revenue and profit from the same quarter a year ago for the slight decline in both revenue and profit from the prior quarter. Primarily due to the loss business we discussed last year. However, we see this as a temporary set back after posting increased revenue in profits over the prior eight consecutive quarters. Specifically for the first quarter of 2008, revenues for the segment total $36.5 million, a $2.6 million or 7.4% increase compared to the first quarter of 2007. The growth was primarily due to net client fundings and existing client growth. Revenues compared to fourth quarter of 2007 were down approximately 4.7%, mainly due to loss business that left at the end of 2007. Our quarterly profit of $10.5 million was up approximately 16% from the same quarter a year ago. However, it was down 8% from the last quarter as we continue to absorb and redeploy the fixed cost of the accruements in loss business. Third party asset balances at the end of the first quarter of 2008 were $225 billion or $9.9 billion higher than at December 31st of 2007. Approximately $13.4 billion of this increase is attributable to additional net client funding and additional paid in capital, which was slightly offset by a negative $3.6 billion in market appreciation. In the first quarter of 2008, we had a strong new business development quarter with new business sales events totaling approximately $6.1 million in annualized revenue. These events included deals across all of our solutions and represent a good diversity between alternative investment products and traditional loan only investment products. Additionally, we had a good re-contract in quarter with our existing client base by extending several key existing client relationships. From a market and industry standpoint, we have been able to maintain an actively and healthy pipeline. While we see strong momentum in outsourcing by investment managers and continue to move key agendas forward, the current volatility and reduced confidence in the capital markets is starting to delay some decisions and some mangers are pushing their funding in the short-term. While this market turmoil logically pushes many investment managers to rethink their infrastructure and look to set themselves for the future, our experience indicate that it does cost the sales cycle to lengthen on average. However as investment mangers position themselves for their future, we feel that our strategic direction and valued proposition of total operational outsourcing not only allows us to differentiate ourselves, but also drive some of the strengths and benefits of our solution to investment mangers at an important inflection point. This combined with global opportunity for growth fuels our confident outlook for the future despite the short-term pressures of current market conditions. I will now turn it over any questions you may have. Question And Answer

[Operator Instructions]. And we have a question from the line of Jeff Hopson. Please go ahead. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Hi, just a question; just to make sure that the big jump in client's assets and our headwind [ph] that's distinct from the $6.1 million of new business, is that fair?

That's fair. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay and any particular reason, I mean was it in isolated event or two that drove the big jump in client activity and is this at historical fee rates or is it at any change of fee rate?

I'd say the jump was, if you remember we had a pretty good strong third and fourth quarter last year as far as new events. And I'd say despite the losses that came out at the end of the year, we did have fundings of deals that we sold last year. So I'd say it was kind of long than normal cycle, there wasn't any one particular thing to set out. And it was at... I think historical in your fee rates. Jeffrey Hopson - Stifel Nicolaus & Company: Okay, thanks a lot.

Sure.

There are no further questions in queue at this time.

Thank you Steve. And I would like to now turn it over to Kathy Heilig to give you a few company wide statistics. Kathy?

Thanks Al. Good morning everyone. I have some additional corporate information about this quarter. First quarter cash flow from operation is $55.8 million or $0.28 per share. First quarter free cash flow, $33.3 million or $0.17 per share. First quarter capital expenditures excluding capitalized software $5.5 million. Capital expenditures for the remainder of 2008 excluding capitalized software are expected to be between $20 million and $25 million. In addition to that, we expect to start sometime this year, expansion of our additional facility and that in total will be about $8.5 million. Tax rates for the first quarter 2008 was 37.1%; for the fourth quarter of 2007, it was 36.7%, we expect that out tax rate to be between 37% to 38%, but it will vary by quarter. The accounts stable balance at March 31st, 2008 was $10.1 million. Then also, we would like to remind you that many of our comments are forward-looking statements, and are based upon assumptions that involves risks and in that financial information presented in our release and on this call is unaudited. Future revenue and income could differ from expected results. We have no obligation to publicly update or correct any statements herein as a result of future developments. You should refer to our periodic SEC filings for description of various risks and uncertainties that could effect our future financial results. Now please free to ask any other questions that you may have. Question And Answer

Our first question in queue comes from the line of Murali Gopal. Please go ahead. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: This is the question for Dennis. Dennis when I look at your expense growth, it looks like it's been pretty well controlled. And I am looking particularly at your compensation expense, which has been more or less flat to slightly down, even though revenues have been growing year-over-year. Can you just talk a little bit about, is it all related to incentive accruals, or what's going on there?

Well, a big portion of our compensation expenses driven by incentive compensation versus fixed salary type cost. So, performance of that company against our internal goals or compensation certainly would affect that line item. So, given the first quarter and how we came out... certainly we are able to reduce costs in that area based on our performance so far. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Right. But if in future quarters the performance is much better than expected, this is going a kind of reverse, so that I mean you are going to... it's going to capture to be better than expected performance, I guess?

All of our employees hope so. Murali Gopal - Keefe Bruyette & Woods: Okay, thanks.

[Operator Instructions]. Ladies and gentlemen at the panel, there are no further questions in queue. Please continue.

Thank you Kathy. So, ladies and gentlemen, despite some of the external short-term uncertainties we've faced, our transformation has been steady and while we have a lot yet to accomplish. We continue to make important strives. And we remain excited about what we are building. One last thing you all are invited to our Annual Investor's conference held this year on June 3rd and 4th. Please save those dates, and a formal invitation will be sent to you in the next couple of weeks. And so if there is any other question now would be the time before we sign off.

We have a question from the line of Justin Hughes of Philadelphia Financial. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my follow up. I just have one follow question on this SIV issue. You said it's not very clear what the underlying collateral is, or what the credit worthiness of the borrowers are. And so I was just wondering what input go to that Columbia model to estimate the ultimate realizable value of 90%. We all know that collateral is in the final rates. [ph]

Well, I guess I would first correct you that your assumption at the underlying value at 90% is the value. I think you are using the aggregate number with the aggregate par position and terming that. I think that part is not quite accurate to begin with, but the model they use looks at the assets classes, sub asset classes, if you will the types of collateral that are held, so whether it's residential mortgages or commercial mortgages or asset backed securities, it takes into account kind of the aggregatemarket impact on those classes. They are underlying sub-class and use of that is one portion of their models. They also look at any pricing available in the market, the reporting pricing source is that are putting up prices on specific pieces of collateral and then add their judgment on top of that.

Okay, so Columbia does have breakout of what the underlying assets are,

Yes, by category. Well, my comment was that it's very difficult to get to is the actual four layers down underlying Dennis McGonigle mortgage in Pennsylvania; that's what is difficult.

Can you just give us the major buckets and what the breakout is like residential mortgages versus commercial?

Well, as I mentioned, I gave you the credit quality. The current credit quality of these underling securities and they kind of get into more detail... for example... more mortgage backed securities and Cheyne are in the mid 30s, but kind of go through that earlier by items that just doesn't necessary the...

Will be in the 10-Q maybe?

Now that will be published in the 10-Q.

Okay.

There are no further questions in queue. Ladies and gentlemen of the panel, please continue.

Well, thank you all for joining us today. We really appreciate it you doing that; and have a great day. Thanks a lot.

Ladies and gentlemen, today's conference call will be available for replay for today at noon Eastern Time until June, 23rd, 2008 midnight of that day. You may access that conference by dialing 1800-475-6701 and entering the access code 918889. If you're dialing from an international location, you will need to dial 320-365-3844 and the access code 918889. Those dial-in numbers once again are 1800-475-6701, and the international dial-in is 320-365-3844 and the access code for both numbers is 918889. Once again, I'd like to thank you for your participation on behalf of the day's panelists. And thank you for using AT&T Executive Teleconference. Have a good day; you may now disconnect.