Welcome to the SolarEdge Conference Call for Quarter ended June 30, 2017. This call being webcast live on the company’s website at www.solaredge.com in the Investor Section on the Events calendar page. This call is the sole property and copyright of SolarEdge with all rights reserved, and any recordings, reproduction, transmission of this call without expressed written consent of SolarEdge is prohibited. You may listen to the webcast replay of this call by visiting the event calendar page on that SolarEdge investor website. I would now like to turn the call over to Erica Mannion, at Sapphire Investor Relations, Investor Relations of SolarEdge. Please begin.

Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us to discuss SolarEdge's operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, as well as the company's outlook for the third quarter of 2017. With me today are Guy Sella, Founder, Chairman and CEO; and Ronen Faier, Chief Financial Officer. Guy will begin with a brief review of the results for the quarter ended June 30, 2017. Ronen will review the financial results for the quarter and provide the company’s outlook for the third quarter of 2017. Then we will open up the call for questions. Please note that this call will include forward-looking statements that involves risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from managements current expectations. We encourage you to review the Safe Harbor statements contained in our press release and the slides published today for a more complete description. All material contained in the webcast is the sole property and copyright of SolarEdge Technologies, with all rights reserved. Please note, this presentation describes certain non-GAAP measures, including non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP net diluted earnings per share, which are not measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The non-GAAP measures are presented in this presentation, as we believe that they provide investors with the means of evaluating and understanding how the company’s management evaluates the company’s operating performance. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation from, or substitutes for, or superior to financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Listeners who do not have a copy of the quarter ended June 30, 2017 press release or the presentation may obtain the copy by visiting the investors section of the company's website. Now I will turn the call over to CEO, Guy Sella.

Thank you, Erica. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us on our conference call. I'm happy to report that we concluded our second quarter with a strong results. We are reporting record revenues for the quarter of $136.1 million, gross margin of 34.6%, GAAP net income of $22.5 million and a record non-GAAP net income of $25.8 million. We also reported a record cash flow from operations of $31.6 million. Let's look at what has driven these positive results. Our revenues see a record high this quarter, and we continue to execute on our business plan in all parameters. We increased our gross margin and profitability, while ASP erosion was within our plan. This increase in gross margin is namely a result of effective cost-reduction of which continues to be a focus for our R&D team, together with efficiency associated with increased revenues, translating into lower per unit production cost. In the second quarter, we shipped 563 megawatts of AC nameplate inverters, approximately 274 megawatts of which will ship to North America. Overall we shipped 1.8 million power optimizers, and 75,000 inverters, yet another record. I want to take this opportunity to highlight some aspects of our business and to address some additional noteworthy measures. Our record revenues this quarter were driven by a modest increase in our North American sales, coupled with significant growth in Europe, in particular, from Germany and the Netherlands. In addition, we continue to see positive momentum in other markets such as Japan, Australia and India, where our newly established team is engaged in developing large commercial opportunities. As in last quarter, our commercial sales continue to grow even slightly more than the very nice growth in our residential sales. In at the last quarters, as we continue to increase our R&D teams and…

Thank you, Guy, and good afternoon, everyone. Before starting the review of our financial results for the second quarter of 2017, I would like to remind listeners that while the overview will be on a GAAP basis, in certain cases, I will be discussing non-GAAP numbers and measures, which exclude the impact of stock-based compensation and deferred tax, as well as non-GAAP earnings per share. Total reconsideration of the pro forma to GAAP results discussed on this call is available on our website and in the press release issued today. Now let's start with our financial results for the second quarter of 2017. Total revenues were $136.1 million, compared to $115.1 million last quarter, and $124.8 million in the prior year period. Revenue growth this quarter was mainly attributed to our growth outside of the United States. While sales in the United States modestly grew this quarter, Europe and the rest of the world represented 45.9% of our revenues. This quarter, only one customer exceeded 10% of revenues, in our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 59.5% of revenues. Gross margin for the quarter was 34.6% comparable 33.6% in the prior quarter, and 31.4% in the same quarter last year. A relatively stable price environment, combined with our continuous cost-reduction, increased sales of HD-Wave inverter is related to other products, and stronger euro compared to the U.S. dollar, were all contributing factors to our improved or gross margins. Moving to operating expenses. Research and development expenses were $12.7 million, an increase of 11% compared to the previous quarter and an increase of 38% compared to the same quarter last year. This increase is in line with our continued investment in new product development and focus on cost reduction. Our R&D team headcount is constantly growing, enabling us to expand teams…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Vishal Shah with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Ronen, Guy, congratulations on a great quarter. First question is on the revenue outlook for the third quarter. Can you talk about where the strength is coming from? Is it still the open markets are expecting U.S. to pick up? And also, what is the kind of pricing environment, you mentioned stable pricing. I know you kind of said in the past that you expect price declines of about 10% on a year-over-year basis, is that still the case? And then finally,, what do you think the gross margin impact is from some of the recent tightness in the year, supply chain you're talking about? Thank you.

So one by one. Revenue outlook would come from the growth we believe in both U.S. and Europe. We'll know better by the end of the quarter, but I think there is a good chances that U.S. sales start to grow nicer than what we saw in Q2, but we'll know only at the end of the quarter. But we feel confident that we'll have overall growth almost in any territory. What was the second question? Pricing? We still assume - for the total year, the estimation of the 10% ASP erosion, I think we give estimation of 10% to 15% ASP erosion by the beginning of the year, it's still assumption today. But we don’t see - on the early basis, we don't see any major change. We think that the total ASP erosion will be within the range we gave you at the beginning of the year. What was the second?

Yes, the third question was around the supply-chain issues that you mentioned and the impact on gross margins.

So, I think they impact on the gross margin will be small. It still retain the 33% to 35% of that to we are giving you, which is, as you remember from a few years ago, within the estimation of how we can grow over until the end of next year to somewhere in the area of 36% to 37%. The effect will be on the higher cost of air shipments and a little bit on longer lead times, but I don't think it will influence yet any major parameter of the quarter. From the global perspective, it seems that for high-power - mainly high-power activity component and modules, there is quite several occasions situation that probably will be with us until Q2 next year. So it's something that we will have to work with and live with and overcome in the next, I believe, 3, 4 quarters.

Thank you.

We'll take our next question from Jeff Osborne with Cowan and Company.

Hey, good afternoon. And congratulations on a strong results. A couple for me. Ronen, I was wondering, could you give us a sense on watch HD Wave penetration is as a percentage of the megawatts that were shipped in the quarter?

We are producing only HD Wave, so beside storage inverters that are few thousand [indiscernible] in Q2, 2 to 3000 inverters were storage inverters. Most of the rest is HD Wave, and it's all the one inverter we're selling, which is more or less 2/3 to 70-some-percent of the total sales of the company.

And all the Three Phases is not HD Wave at the moment?

No, no. Three Phases is not HD Wave yet. Only by the end of 2018.

Got it. And then how do you think about the OpEx trajectory in the second half? Certainly you’ve given guidance on the revenue and nice growth there, but just given the kind of internationalization of the company, how do we think about more feet on the street, as well as some of the product initiatives that you highlighted in Intersolar?

So I can say several things and let differentiate between R&D and sales and marketing and G&A. On the R&D, as we mentioned in the previous calls and throughout the quarter, we believe that overall we'll try to grow by a 25% in the expenditures. However, given our financial position, usually, the problem with growing R&D is not actually whether you have restrictions on the budget or not, its actually having the right people to recruit them, have them joining the company and have them become useful in the way that the organization can observe and they can basically prove themselves. And as such, while we would like to grow more than a 25% year-over-year, I believe that this 25% is the right number, simply given the fact that there is a certain amount of people that you can hire and train within a limited period of time. When you talk about sales and marketing, so first of all, the second and the third quarter are usually higher on sales and marketing because of the large trade shows, we have Intersolar and SPI, and also in other areas around the world. And we're operating in many geographies, as you can see. So usually, you see a little bit of bigger growth there, which is supposed to be much smaller in Q4. And when it comes to G&A, G&A is fairly stable and growing quite slowly. So because of the fact that we all – already have all of the, I would call it infrastructure needed to support the company of that side. In general, the rule of the thumb is that, on the annual basis, operating expenses as percentage of revenue should decrease in order to allow us to increase profitability. And we still believe that this will be the trajectory that we're supposed to see.

Got it. And last question I had, just with softness or the solar market here in the US. Have any concerns about channel inventory as some of the older product or do you feel comfortable that, that's been flushed out?

We don't think that there is a higher inventory in the channel today than what it was in Q1. I think in a way, maybe the opposite is true. We do see a tendency for some people to build inventory due to [indiscernible] case. So do something that we wouldn't know on a namely basis, but we do see or do here in the market there are some people that building inventory, assuming that this will change the behavior of customers towards the end of the a. But the, in general I think see less inventory in channels that what we saw the beginning of - in similar time in Q1.

Got it. Thanks so much.

Thank you.

We'll take our next question from Mark Strouse the JPMorgan.

Good evening. Thanks very much for taking my questions and I’ll add my congratulations as well. So can you just talk about the competitive landscape? I think you've been getting share for quite a while now. But is it fair to say that during Q2, that market share shift accelerated as some of your distress competitors, potentially became even more distressed? And then, on the flip side of that, are you seeing any signs of new competition coming in anytime in the next year or so?

So we hear the rumours that Huawei is supposed to come with a commercial inverters and optimizes. We didn't see any of this component. All we saw was mock-up [ph] in some shows. So we don't know better than you if those are just mock-up, its something will show in the market. We feel very confident with our intellectual property to protect what we invented a decade ago and leading the space with. Regarding accelerating market share, I don't think we have enough data points to confirm such a claim. I guess, we'll have to wait and see and hear a few other earning call next week. And then maybe we, you, all of us will have a better view of the exact market share. But I think that we feel very confident with our ability to take market share in the U.S. and in Europe.

Okay. Thanks, Guy. Just 1 quick follow-up if I can. What was the mix of C&1 during Q2? And how should we think about that trending over the next few quarters?

So all in all, it was slightly higher than in the last quarter. As we said last quarter, which was a little bit over 32% of revenues and this quarter was slightly higher, not much more. But given the fact that the growth that you saw in revenue, that means also sales on the sales group nominally. And as Guy mentioned in the previous also, we truly aim for the end of 2010 to be 50-50 percent between C&I and residential, and we clearly see that C&I is continuing to take more and more share of our revenues.

Okay. That’s it from me. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

And we'll take our next question from John Windham with Barclays.

Hi, Guy, Ronen. Thanks for taking the question. We've done a lot of work this quarter on channel checks and the feedback on HD Wave was overwhelmingly positive. So congratulations on the product launch. Having said that, can you talk a little bit about the S-Series and where that's going to fit in the product portfolio and to more specific on when that might roll out in 2018?

So the answer we start - we'll replace in full the current optimizers. It's the new ASIC [ph] that we are operating in less for – I think close to a couple of years. It has better power to volume density, which means that it's all - in power electronics as you know, translating to cost reduction. And it has this unique feature which we think is very important. As you're probably aware of lots of problems with connector, where we can detect the connector temperature. And therefore stop the system if the temperature is going above and normal connector temperature way before an arc will start. As you understand, there are two - in 1 hand, we want to enjoy the cost reduction, on the other hand, we are hoping to be in a quarter, manufacturing the 80%, 90% of optimizer already or with always fully automatic assembly centers. So transforming those into the next generation probably will take us 3 to 4 quarters. So I would expect that we'll start to roll out the new product by Q2, and we will finish to roll it out by the end of next year.

Nice, perfect. Thank you for that.

Thank you.

And we'll take our next question from Philip Shen with ROTH Capital Partners.

Hey, guys. Thanks for the question and congrats on the quarter as well. As a follow-up to the ASPs question and topic. I was wondering if you might be able to split the year-on-year change that you see for resi commercial? I know you’re talking about a blended decline of 10% to 15%. But as far as you can split that up, that will be helpful? Thanks.

So I’ll try to give. We cannot split each one of them because some of the products are actually going to the same markets. But I'll try to give you a little bit of the trends that we see. So I can say that in general, there are some effects that are eventually baked into the ASP that are mostly related to mix or geographical mix. And this is the fact that, due to the higher sales that we see in Europe right now is percentage of revenue and due to the fact that the euro because much stronger than the US dollars, that means that now we actually see in some cases that the - on a dollar basis, the ASP in Europe is increasing and of course, the bigger the amount sales in Europe, the overall effect is much bigger. So if you take out all of these effects related to geographical mix and currencies that are somehow distorting the view, we generally see relatively stable ASP environments, where we see almost no market-wide changes or pressures on the ASP. There are pinpoints that we sometimes need to react or change prices based on demand or based on opportunity. But in general, we see no new competition, no new competitive price pressure, no new different products that require us to right now drop the price is. And as such, we see relatively stable ASP environments overall.

Great. Thanks, Ronen. As a follow up to margins, I think I heard you say - I thank you said, 36% to 737% long-term gross margins. I was wondering if you might be able to expand on that, you know, back to the IPO, you guys were talking about your long-term margins being between 30% and 35% in this quarter as you're hitting close to 35%. So longer term, assuming the competitive environment stays stable, where do you think the margins could go?

So from the very first days on the road show we were very consistent. We said 32% to 37%, and this is something that, over the last 2.5 years, we reiterated that we still see as our long-term motive. In general, when we look at the gross margin it's a combination, of course, of the ASP, but also of the company's ability to drop the costs. And dropping costs mainly comes from innovation and mainly comes from the ability to execute on, I would call it magazine of cost reduction measures that we already have; where each one of these elements require R&D activity that is always coming on the account of new products. So it's always a balance what you do, do you do more product development or more cost-reduction? We feel very comfortable with the 37% moving forward. Even if we see competition growing or where it is today, we believe that amount of identified cost-reduction items, especially now with HD Wave which is only at the very beginning of its way when it comes to cost reductions and the ability to continue and improve the product from the new generation of optimizers, we see a lot of it areas where we can continue into this. And as such, it seems that we can continue and drop costs out of HD. On the other hand, we see much higher than 37%, it something that is hard for us to see. Simply because of the effect of this industry did not experience something like it before, and we always believe that there is some balance between your ability to grow margins and your customer's power to try and take some of these margins away from you and move to their margin. So we are still very comfortable with the upper limit of the 37% from the last 2.5 years and we'll do everything to continue to execute on this.

Great. One more if I way. In terms of your growth outlook. You focus of residential or you're growing your commercial. The segment that you're not in is utility scale. Can you give us an update on your ability to address utility scale? What the timing might be? What do you expect your value proposition to be? And was string inverters kind of attacking the scale market? How are you looking at that market in that segment now? And what could be the timing as to when that business could kick in?

So we started to reach, I think prices - especially with the new Jumbo Jupiter [ph] that allow us to compete on the market of industrial or utility scale project that are based on string inverter. This is a part of our core development to 2018, and I believe that the first product is a good fit. And by the end of 2018, 2019, will have a full suite of product aiming specifically for utility scale projects. And I believe that this time we'll take our share of this segment as well.

Great. Thank you, guys. I’ll jump back in the queue.

Thank you.

We'll take our next question from Joseph Osha with JMP Securities.

Hello Yes, my congratulations as well. I'm wondering if it can talk about HD Wave in a Three Phase market a bit. I heard you say late 2018. What are the key challenges here? Is it simply a case of tripling the electronics on the AC side and maybe just talk a little bit about what the advantages of HD Wave might look like in that Three-Phase market? Thank you.

The topology of HD Wave is what we believe is a much better topology It will allow you to improve efficiency to above 99%. Today, we are at around 98%, 98.5%. The difference in percentage of efficiency is not the main point, the main point that it will reduce the heat dissipation by half. And therefore, it will allow you to reduce dramatically the size of inverter, while reducing the passive components of magnetic capacitors. It's a long development process. There is nothing that - there is no specific points that are more complex than others. When we develop the technology of HD Wave, we developed in parallel, both topologies, but we have - we have given R&D power. We have a more or less 30% to 50% of all our resources are focused on cost reduction, that's how we can improve our gross margin quarter-over-quarter. And with the rest of the R&D team, we have to prioritize development, and we prioritize the One Phase over the Three Phase. So that's only reason why the Three Phase will come next year where the One Phase face came a year ago.

Okay, And then just a follow-up on the many, many margin question. Let's say hypothetically that you do end up with this 37% and you Ronen are looking at it and saying gosh, this is high, relative to history. At that point do you start giving any additional margin back as price?

I think we'll just enjoy the cost reduction to increase market share. We always can reduce price, increase market share or increase price and take smaller market share. I think that it's around 37%, it's better to increase market share thank to increase gross margin, but that's an opinion like any other opinion.

Absolutely. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from Colin Rusch with Oppenheimer.

Thanks so much guys. Can you talk a little bit about the currency impact in gross margins and just kind of give us a sense of how large that was in the quarter?

So in general, we cannot give that and give the numbers themselves. I can say that they are not - not all of the growth that you saw this quarter was attributed to this much smaller effect. But in general, when we saw that in the last years because of the shrinking euro towards the U.S. dollar, and we saw the margins also reducing and we suffered a little bit. Now we see a little bit better, I would call it better-than-expected effect. And think that most of the effect of the currency is not actually on the price of the gross margin, it's actually on the financial income because the side effect of having the high AR balances in euros, means actually that when the dollar is de-evaluating against the euro, you see the very high financial income. So maybe, 1 should say, we should add some of the unusually high financial income and put it into the margin in order to really see the effect, but I would say that, it's a positive effect, but not all of the improvement that you saw from the last quarter.

Okay. That’s super helpful. Ronen, thank you. And then just in terms of geographic diversity, its nice to see how those end markets, can talk a little bit about your anticipation of mix in the third quarter embedded in your guidance, geographically simply…

So first of all, we - the guidance assumes growth seen. I would say, most if not all of the regions in which we are our operating. So as I mentioned at the beginning of the call, we believe or and the questionable. We believe that U.S. markets will show a little bit of better growth in the third quarter compared to the second quarter. And we do expect at the same time that the summer in Europe is continues to play very nice effect that will allow us to grow. We expect that the ratio will be close to where it is right now. And again, we'll have to see when the quarter ends, but in general, we do not expect major shifts in the U.S. and non-U.S. business. All in all, though, we also see that again, it is not affected in the numbers. But the growth that we see some of the be insurance is also in Japan and India, Australia, those markets does not really affect dramatically, right now, the numbers are also growing in a nice and substantial percentages. But this is coming off a smaller base. So all in all, we will continue to see non-U.S. strong sales over the third quarter. And this is what is also baked into our guidance.

Okay, excellent, Thanks a lot guys.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from John Quealy with the Canaccord.

Good afternoon, and evening folks. And congrats again. Just maybe to the balance sheet for a minute. The movement of generated cash into marketable securities in the long-term side. Just talk about your uses for those - for that cash moving forward. Obviously, you talked about deepening the supply chain on some part shortages, et cetera, the R&D push and then also something we haven't talked about it, M&A. So just, if you don't mind, just give us an overview of the why putting the cash there now and how do you feel about deploying it inorganically?

Okay. I'll start on the second part of the question. Most of our investment among the center of this in policy are relatively to the short duration. Both given the expected movement in interest rates but also given the fact that we know that, some of the money will have to be liquidated within a reasonable timeframe, if we decide to do any moves such as M&A that you have mentioned or any other act. At the same time, given the interest rate environment that you see today on time deposits, if you don't invested in marketable securities, even for a short duration, you get close to 0% as and given the substantial amount, with sympathetic that's a few more points to the EPS is something that's never harmed anyone. From cash deployment's point of view, nothing really changed dramatically. The first thing is that, as a company, the bigger you are, the more you do to maintain cash to run your working capital. Increased sales mean increased manufacturing, means increase sourcing, means increased sourcing of the component. We are sourcing some of the components for our quartet manufacturers to make sure that we are in control of our supply chain. This is something that also require cash. And we also have cash that is always there to support our warranty obligation. As they – and we’re company that give 25 years warranty, it's not just important to accrue everything and put it in your balance sheet. Having money to actually support this accrual something that we deem to be very important. And the last issue again is the M&A front. We are looking for companies, we believe that once opportunities will come, we should be able to perform and basically acquire a company that could add to the revenues and profitability and as such; I'll leave the cash as it is right now. In general though, we do not see very long-term investments, most of the investments are short-term security.

Okay, thanks and as my follow up, just back to the gross margin question. What types of product vitality, some of the things that we saw at Intersolar, my guess are 24-month type introductions? Can you just comment on the cadence of gross margins and products moving into the sort of '18, '19 timeframe, inherently better margins, et cetera? What sort of product vitality of that boost we saw, how much of that should be in sales and, I don't know, in a year? Thank you, guys.

Thank you for the question. So in general, as he said, all alone, we will not see even from - either from your product or existing product, that are enjoying cost reductions, we usually we don't see one step function jump in gross margin. Given the fact that again, sales are so much diverse in products and geographies and in segments that even if you grow, one specific product, it does not affect automatically across the board. And as such, you will see, I would call it more of a linear crawling up gross margin towards the 37%, then jump. The 35%, 37% that you mentioned before is something that we can be achieved within the next few quarters. It is not something that will have to wait, we believe, for 3, 4 years. But at the same time, again, it is something that you'll see more of a steady growth then one jump that will happen immediately.

And as there are no further questions. I'd now like to turn the conference back to CEO, Guy Sella, for any additional closing remarks.

In summary, our second quarter results show continues successful of execution of our business strategy with record revenues and consistent growth and profitability. We are well-positioned to continue to expand our business with new product offering and in new territories. We look forward to continuing this momentum. Thank you for joining us on today's call. All the best.

And once again, that concludes today's presentation. We thank you all for your participation, and you may now disconnect.