Good morning, and good evening to all, and welcome to the Sea Limited Second Quarter 2024 Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And finally I would like to advise all participants that this call is being recorded. Thank you. I'd now like to welcome Mr. MC Koh to begin the conference. Please go ahead.

Hello, everyone, and welcome to Sea's 2024 second quarter earnings conference call. I am MC, Sea's Investor Relations Director. On this call, we may make forward-looking statements, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and may not be realized in the future for various reasons as stated in our press release. Also, this call includes a discussion of certain non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted EBITDA. We believe these measures can enhance our investors' understanding of the actual cash flows of our major businesses when used as a complement to our GAAP disclosures. For a discussion of the use of non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliation of the closest GAAP measures, please refer to the section on non-GAAP financial measures in our press release. I have with me Sea's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Forrest Li; President, Chris Feng; and Chief Financial Officer, Tony Hou. Our management will share strategy and business updates, operating highlights and financial performance for the second quarter of 2024. This will be followed by a Q&A session in which we welcome any questions you have. With that let me turn the call over to Forrest.

Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. I'm happy to report that it has been a solid quarter for us with our strong momentum from Q1 continuing into Q2. All three of our businesses have shown both strong growth and higher profitability. Before I dive into each business results, I wanted to share some observations of our Southeast Asia's market. Generally, retail and consumer spending trends in the region have remained healthy with domestic consumption continuing to be a main driver of economic performance in many markets. This sets a very strong macro foundation for our e-commerce business. We are happy with Shopee's market share in Southeast Asia and our sizable lead over our peers in the region. We are seeing more market share consolidation and an industry-wide take rate increase. We believe this will move the industry toward profitability and sustainability, and we welcome this trend. With the strong results delivered in the first half and our outlook for the rest of the year, we expect that Shopee will become adjusted EBITDA positive from the third quarter. We are also revising up our guidance for Shopee's 2024 full year GMV growth rate to the mid-20s. With that, let me take you through each business's performance in more detail. Starting with e-commerce. As we have shared before, Shopee's operational priorities are to deepen our competitive moats on three fronts. Enhancing our price competitiveness, improving service quality to customers and strengthening our content ecosystem. This strategy is paying off. Over the past two quarters, Shopee has been able to post healthy, sustainable growth while also improving its profit profile. One area we are placing greater focus on is improving our ad take rate. Currently, our ad take rate is lower than the industry average we observe in more mature…

Thank you, Forrest, and thanks to everyone for joining the call. For Sea overall, total GAAP revenue increased 23% year-on-year to $3.8 billion in the second quarter of 2024. This was primarily driven by GMV growth of our e-commerce business and the growth of our Digital Financial Services business. Our total adjusted EBITDA was $448 million in the second quarter of 2024 compared to an adjusted EBITDA of $510 million in the second quarter of 2023. On e-commerce, Shopee's gross orders grew 40% and GMV increased by 29% year-on-year. Our second quarter GAAP revenue of $2.8 billion included GAAP marketplace revenue of $2.5 billion, up 33% year-on-year, and GAAP product revenue of $0.3 billion. Within GAAP marketplace revenue, core marketplace revenue mainly consisting of transaction-based fees and advertising revenues was $1.8 billion, up 41% year-on-year. Value-added services revenue, mainly consisting of revenues related to logistics services was $0.7 billion, up 16% year-on-year. E-commerce adjusted EBITDA improved quarter-on-quarter with losses narrowing to $9 million in the second quarter of 2024 compared to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $22 million in the first quarter of 2024 and an adjusted EBITDA of $150 million in the second quarter of 2023. For our Asia markets, we continued to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA following our first quarter of 2024 results, recording $4 million during the quarter compared to an adjusted EBITDA of $204 million in the second quarter of 2023. In our other markets, the adjusted EBITDA loss was $30 million, narrowing meaningfully from last year when losses were $54 million. In Brazil, unit economics continued to improve as we achieved a positive contribution margin per order of $0.09 for the quarter as compared to a loss of $0.24 in the second quarter of 2023. Digital Financial Services GAAP revenue was up by 21% year-on-year to $519 million. Adjusted EBITDA was up by 20% year-on-year to $165 million. As of the end of June, our consumer and SME loans principal outstanding reached $3.5 billion, up almost 40% year-on-year and 8% quarter-on-quarter. Non-performing loans past due by more than 90 days as a percentage of total consumer and SME loans was 1.3% at the end of the quarter. Digital Entertainment bookings were $537 million, up 21% year-on-year and 5% quarter-on-quarter. GAAP revenue was $436 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $303 million. Returning to our consolidated numbers. We recognized a net non-operating income of $56 million in the second quarter of 2024 compared to a net non-operating income of $108 million in the second quarter of 2023. We had a net income tax expense of $61 million in the second quarter of 2024 compared to net income tax expense of $62 million in the second quarter of 2023. As a result, net income was $80 million in the second quarter of 2024 as compared to net income of $331 million in the second quarter of 2023. With that, let me turn the call to MC.

Thank you, Forrest and Tony. We're now ready to open the call to questions. Operator?

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Pang Vittayaamnuaykoon with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Good afternoon, management. Thank you very much for the opportunities. Two questions from my side both on e-commerce. Number one, could you please comment on the latest competitive landscape you have observed? We are seeing all players, including yourself, push for further rationalization into third quarter, especially on the merchant front. How should this translate into your results and your updated guidance? In another word, what factors do you include in your revised guidance? That's question number one. Question number two, specifically on margins, what type of near and medium-term margins can we expect Shopee to deliver? And how do you plan to achieve that? Any update on long-term margin expectations as well?

Yes, on the competitive landscape, I think as Forrest mentioned in the opening, we do see a more stable competitive environment in the past few months. And as you mentioned, we are positive movement in terms of the take rate from various players in our market. And I think we welcome that as a signal of a more stable environment for a competition perspective. And our longer-term view on the profitability target stay unchanged as 2% to 3% of the EBITDA as we shared before. However, we believe the market is still quite dynamic. And in the short-term, we will likely number one focusing on the profitability of the businesses. We were, as we shared in our guidance in Q3, we will be profitable as the Shopee business is. But at the same time, we also like to grow as there is still a good potential in the market we operate in. We would like to make sure that as a business, we can outgrow the market as well in the short-term rather than maximizing the profit in the near-term. If we look a little bit to the medium terms, we do expect the overall competitive landscape in our market to continue to evolve and continue to come into a more rational stage even compared to where we are right now which will drive the overall industry profitability to improve. If you look at the overall market, as we mentioned, is still rather dynamic with a more stable competitive environment. But there are things we can control, there are things we cannot control. We were rather focusing on the things we can control. For example, the thing that we shared in the opening, we want to have better pricing, we would like to have better user experience. We would like to have a better content supply to our users. But together with the larger scale of where we are right now compared to our competitors, we will, all those things will help us to always be better positioned to deliver better value to our consumers and ultimately have better unit economics, which will translate to the market share gain over time as well. I think that's kind of like how we probably see the market in the near-term, mid-term and the longer-term.

Your next question comes from the line of Piyush Choudhary with HSBC. Your line is open.

Yeah. Hi. Thanks for the opportunity and congrats to the management team on good set of results. Two questions, again, both on e-commerce. As you mentioned earlier, you have been increasing take rates and the industry has also increased take rates during 1H. Is it possible to further increase the take rates? And are you able to reduce the shipping subsidies? That's the first question. Secondly, can you talk about the unit economics of live-streaming business? Has it turned profitable now in some countries? How is the contribution margin for live streaming segment? Thank you.

For the take rate, we do believe there are opportunities to further increase the take rate. I think part of that comes from commissions and fees. And as you probably observed, we do increased meaningfully in the past few quarters. I think there are still opportunity to further increase that, although probably not in the magnitude that we see in the early part of the year. There's another part of take rate, which we think that is also having a sizable opportunity is on the ad side. So that, as we shared in the opening, we do focus a lot on the ad side. We spent quite effort on building infrastructure to the ad side in the past few quarters, like, for example, we built a standard platform for our recommendation and search. We also built a standard algorithm and platform for our ad system and organic traffic allocations. All those will help us to be able to allocate traffic more agile and more flexible. And this enables us to offer better ad product to the seller side as well, which we are rolling out in the next few quarters. We believe all those efforts will help us on the ad take rate improvement in the coming quarters. On the UE pool, for live stream, we do see UE improvement quarter-on-quarter actually if you look at all markets, some markets are profitable, some markets are still improving. But I think generally we believe the trend will continue in terms of the UE improvement for our live stream businesses.

Your next question comes from the line of Marissa Putri with UBS. Your line is open.

Hi, management. So I have two questions. Firstly, on e-commerce. So you've just reported your first CM positive from Brazil and I think still with ambitions to kind of be number two in the market. How do you plan in achieving this? Should we think of the improved profitability as sustainable? And number two is kind of just to make sure that I'm getting your guidance correctly. So the adjusted EBITDA positive will be just for standalone Q3 EBITDA, but not overall nine months EBITDA positive in Q3. Thanks.

For the Brazil businesses, we are very happy about the improvement on the margins in the market. As we shared in the earnings, the contribution margin for the Brazil market is positive already. And we also see there is a good potential in Brazil market. The core for us in Brazil is, I think, number one, we are able to consistently reduce our shipping costs in the market through our own largest networks. Number two is we're also improving the user experience in the market thankfully over the past quarters. I think in combination, it drives better user retention and also better unit economics to our market. The other thing that's important for our Brazil market besides the user experience and the unit economic improvement is the ability for us to increase our penetration of the higher basket categories over time. We do believe that we have a sizable potential there to further increase our market share penetrations to those categories. Traditionally, we are not as strong as compared to some of other players in the market. So with all that, we do feel that there is a meaningful potential for us to grow further in Brazil market and we can see the levers that we have and we are working on those levers. In terms of the EBITDA guidance, I think, what we refer to is the third quarter EBITDA positive. I think that the understanding is correct on that.

Your next question comes from the line of Alicia Yap with Citigroup. Your line is open.

Hi. Thank you. Good evening, management. Thanks for taking my questions. Two questions. First, can management share the update on the progress of acquiring on the non-Shopee platform user for the DFS business and the GTV growth for the non-Shopee platform? Will this be more from the offline transactions like those offline retailers, the restaurant partners or Sea actually will be open to work with any online partners, including, for example, the online travel agents? So this is for the DFS question. Second question is related to Shopee Express. So how are we going to further optimize the operational efficiency and also further improve the cost structure for the logistics business in the coming quarters? Thank you.

On the first question, if you look at our credit loan portfolio, there are a few components of that. We have Shopee PayLater, which is very much quite connected to Shopee, the SPayLater as we call it. It's used as part of Shopee transactions. Besides that, we have buying cash flow, which is the cash flow that not related to Shopee, anyone can take a loan from it. And on top of that, we also have the offline payment through SPayLater. And the same SPayLater that can be used offline can also be used online through a ShopeePay acquiring network. Besides that, we are also developing different kind of use cases for offline usage, for example, the headphone purchase as we shared in the opening. So if you -- and similar type of specialized services can be deployed in future as well that we're working on, for example, the potential home appliance purchase offline, it can be online as well. For example, the other type of [Technical Difficulty]. So the -- I think to the question whether it's mainly offline or it's online as well, I think, the answer is probably a combination of both. In fact, if you are in some of the markets offline in Indonesia, the user can use our Shopee PayLater, SPayLater solutions to pay in an online trouble website already. So we do work with various, both online and offline partners to enable SPayLater for their transactions. And we expect the partner will grow over time for both online and offline use. So it wouldn't be only offline. For the second question regarding SPX, we actually have follow-up lever to further improve the efficiency of SPX. For example number one is the scale. There is still sizable room for us to grow our scale further,…

Your next question comes from the line of Ellie Jiang with Macquarie. Your line is open.

Hey, good evening. Thank you management for taking my question. I have two. Number one is a follow-up on e-commerce. Just wanted to ask about the ad take rate the management commented. We talked about the sizable opportunities ahead. But if we look in the next several years, what kind of timeline do we really anticipate to ramp up this app kind of revenue and potentially get to a level that's similar to the mutual market players? And so for example, how does it take to -- for us to simulate more ad spending from the merchants, would it be more efficient marketing tools or coming from more higher ticket sized item sales? And the second question is on the gaming segment. So it seems like Free Fire is really generating momentum and according to some third-party trackers, the momentum remained quite strong quarter-to-date. So can you comment on the visibility or the sustainability for the second half outlook? And for the potential kind of Need for Speed distribution that we partner with Tencent, what kind of financial kind of contribution would that be coming from the second half as well? Thank you.

On the ad take rate, I think, given the foundation we have built, as I shared earlier, we do believe that we will start to gain a benefit in the next few quarters, probably wouldn't take a few years. I think we're talking about probably quarters. I think the basic product there, I think it will take some time for the seller to adopt to it, and also why there's different seller adopt to it. We have to optimize it for different markets. And I think it comes in both in terms of the improved efficiency on how the seller use ads product and also from our side as a platform, how we can allocate the traffic in a more efficient way, giving a seller more upside without sacrificing the overall platform conversion rate. I think that's essentially the technology we've built in the past few quarters and we're trying to rollout and optimize in the next few quarters.

On the gaming side, as you mentioned, we are very happy and we are very motivated by the trend we have observed on Free Fire. This is across pretty much all the metrics in terms of the new users, in terms of the, like the user, the existing user retention and also such as some like a monetization metrics as well like paying ratios, right, and overall the growth rate. This is kind of like this is a demonstrate what we have done in the past is a right decision we made and it's the right focus we have. And we will continue to do that. And so, we'll be very, very focused on the content update, right? And in the past two quarters and we have some very, very successful new content release and around some festival campaigns and some like unique gameplay, new user, new gameplay experience. So we'll continue to do that. There will be several big updates already in the pipeline and we have a pretty kind of a strong confidence on the result of those -- on those new updates. And on top of that and we are continually seeing Free Fire as a platform and it's not just every like evergreen franchise, it's more like a platform. The way we think about it, this is, as we shared, like on every single date like Free Fire can reach more than 100 million users globally. So that is a -- that is very, very sizable. That is a very, very large scale. I think like although you may consider the game is called -- it's always the name is always called Free Fire, but in Free Fire, so if you log into the game and you start to experience all different types of game experience…

Your next question comes from the line of Divya Kothiyal with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Yeah. Thank you very much. My first question is just on your views on the higher risk from competition from cross-border e-commerce in ASEAN. I mean given the traction that team was seeing in recent months in Philippines and Malaysia and their recent entry in Thailand, do you think that this could also become a credible competitor the way TikTok kind of came to this geography? And how are we planning to respond to this, especially in relation to our positive adjusted EBITDA guidance for the third quarter? And my second question is on e-commerce GMV. Is the higher guidance coming more from the surprises in Brazil or is it from ASEAN? And if you can comment on the trends that you're seeing in July and August, given that second half is slightly tougher base than the first half? And are we seeing any sort of tapering there? Thank you.

For the CB players, I think, you will probably refer to Temu's businesses coming to Asia. I mean, generally, we have a lot of respect for what Pinduoduo and Temu has achieved in the past years. However, I think, for our market, we'll probably monitor, but from what we see so far. I think the impact to our business is probably rather limited from what we see, I think, for two reasons. One is CB by nature is a smaller part of our businesses in our market. And if you look at the market like Philippines, Thailand or Malaysia mentioned, majority of the e-commerce transaction happen to be a domestic selling rather than cross-border selling, right? There are many reasons to contribute to that. Yeah, of course, but as a fact, that's how the market landscape evolved to for the better efficiency and cost structure that the domestic e-commerce offers. And that's one. Second one is the great strength for Temu other cross-border players entering to US or European market is that pricing. They typically carries a significant price advantage compared to the existing players. However, if you compare our pricing to their pricing in the market that you mentioned, Philippines, Thailand or Malaysia, we actually have a much better pricing advantage compared to them. It was mainly because we actually operate in a very competitive environment for quite a long time. And we have been essentially having a very competitive seller landscape domestically for quite a while. And also compared to a more developed market where the operating cost is much higher compared to the operating cost in China, the operating cost for our sellers in our market domestically is probably cheaper than operating costs in China. If you take a person in Philippines to open a warehouse or…

Your next question comes from the line of Sachin Salgaonkar with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi. Thank you for the opportunity and congrats on a good set of numbers. I have two questions. First one on gaming and second one on e-commerce. On gaming, again, when we look at your numbers, one gets a sense that your bookings are up, your users are up, but revenue is down. And we are seeing that trend for last couple of quarters where ARPU continues to go down. What happened this quarter was clearly we could see margins almost being at an all-time high. So I want to understand, is this a specific trend we should look at going ahead where ARPU continues to decline and margins continue to improve or at least stay at these levels? Second question I understand your earlier comments on competition being rational, but just want to double-click on a couple of markets. One, Taiwan, where we have a new competitor, Coupang, which is aggressive. So would love to know your thoughts on overall competitive intensity in that market. And second, in Indonesia, where one of the players had increased subsidies in the market. So any specific response from you guys to that? And how are you guys looking at the increased subsidies? Thanks.

Thanks for the question. I think for the first question, you're talking about the GAAP revenue. So basically the bookings actually improved both Q-o-Q and year-over-year and while because of the GAAP treatment, we have to defer more revenues into the fourth -- future quarters. So that's why we typically see the variations in the GAAP revenue side that is on the reverse side with the bookings side. So while for ARPU, what we see is average revenue per user is relatively stable, while it might be fluctuating a little bit, but it's more coming from the market mix. We don't see a very big fluctuation Q-o-Q for this quarter.

Yes, I think for your question on your competitive landscape in Taiwan and Indonesia. If you look at Taiwan, I think Taiwan, we still enjoy a rather dominant market position in the market. We do see some new entrances and we do look at it seriously, but I think the impact to our business at this stage is relatively small. And the core thing for us, I mean, without commenting too much on specific competitors, of course. The core thing that we are doing in Taiwan is number one, to shorten our delivery time through our own SPX network. We are covering a lot more next day deliveries through our own SPX network, which is typically done through a 3PL with much more expensive delivery systems. We are able to do a negative delivery was much cheaper in many cases probably 40% cheaper than the alternative solution in the market. And that's one. Second one is to further increase the efficiency of the supply side to work with our sellers to fulfill their orders, not only the delivery side, but also the warehousing side, the fulfillment side to do it in a more cost-effective way. And number three is to work with more sellers to increase their assortment for those areas that we think can be further enhanced. And I think all these things will help us to maintain our competitiveness in the market while maintaining the profitability in the market. For Indonesia, I think, there are different players doing different things in the market and there will be seasonal fluctuations. And we would pay less attention to sort of short-term up and downs on the subsidies you mentioned. I think we look at sort of a slightly longer-term or let's say medium-term trend, at least month-to-month or quarter-to-quarter trends. We didn't see any significant changes around that, if you look at slightly longer-term rather than focusing on specific campaigns or specific weeks or days.

Your next question comes from the line of Thomas Chong with Jefferies. Your line is open.

Hi. Good evening. Thanks management for taking my question. My first question is about our DFS business. Just now, I think, our management comments a lot about BNPL, cash loan, and off-Shopee PayLater, I just want to get some color with regard to the margin trend for different categories. Any color about the margin profile would be great. And on the other hand, I think, given the macro uncertainties we are seeing globally, how should we think about the risk management, in particular, the ticket size and the tenure, et cetera? And my second question is more about the overall business. Given our different business segments are seeing a very good growth momentum, how should we think about the longer-term revenue mix profile? Should we expect DFS to become more meaningful in the long-term? Thank you.

On the first one on the margin trends, if you look at a particular market or a particular product in our portfolio, our margin has been relatively stable. In fact, in some markets, we see better risk profiles and therefore our product, which will in turn better EBITDA ultimately. But one thing I do want to share on this topic is that, given that we have many different markets and we do see that the newer market has probably a faster speed of growth. If you track our history, we typically we started our lending products in Indonesia first and we expand to other markets like Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Brazil. So typically, you will see that given the smaller base, so the latest market has a slightly faster growth than the early market. I think that's the natural trend. And in fact, we are very happy with the growth we see in some of the new markets. For example, in Thailand, we see very good growth. In Brazil, we are -- also saw a quite good growth in the past quarters. And on these macro uncertainties, in generally, I think there are many macro factors impacting our market. And I think that was a big macro impact from the COVID time, after COVID time. I think that since late last year, we have seen a more stable macro-environment impact for most of the market. There are two things that's important for us in terms of managing the macro-environment. One is the duration of our lending product, second one is the ticket size you mentioned. So in general, our duration is rather a short duration rather than a very long duration. By short duration, we are talking about just a few months in average, right? And our ticket size also compared to many other lending products, our ticket size is more on the smaller side. So in the combination of both, it will help us to be a lot more agile in terms of how we manage our portfolio, manage portfolio in terms of how much lending we give out, how can we do risk-based pricing for different user bases and also how we do collections and how do we kind of fine-tune our portfolio based on the macro-environment. So in that sense, I think we are quite comfortable with where we are. And even if unexpected market environment changed, I think, we are probably much better positioned than anyone else that we can see in the market with our size, yeah.

For the long-term revenue mix of three businesses, if you look at each of the three businesses, I think each of them some like, at this moment, have some tailwind, right? And for our like estimated in e-commerce cycle GMV growth, right, and that will be the driver of the potential revenue growth as well. And if we continually work on the take rate and not only on the commission side, but also on the ad take rate side, right, and that is could be a driver as well. And if you look at the Financial Services business as we shared and if we continually deepen the penetration in, on Shopee ecosystem, at the same time, the total like a loan book size will be, I think, grow nicely with the overall Shopee GMV growth as well. For game business, as we shared early, right, and we found the right formula for grow the Free Fire again and we see a very, very strong momentum. So at this point, I think, it's hard to comment. We don't see like certain businesses go up and certain businesses go down. And then it is changed how the revenue mix will look like, I would say like, we will be continually focused on grow each of the businesses as much as we can. But like as Tony just mentioned, but purely from a GAAP revenue perspective, certain growth of the game business because of how the GAAP revenue works, it may be a certain delay how to reflect into the GAAP revenue, right? And so that's why, in general, we use the booking as the like a closer proxy, the benchmark in terms of the growth. From that perspective, maybe we can like see the higher percentage of the revenue contribution from Financial Services. But again, this is purely in our view, because of the GAAP revenue treatment for the game business doesn't reflect we kind of our -- we don't have the confidence on the future growth of the game business, yeah.

Your next question comes from the line of Jiong Shao of Barclays. Your line is open.

Thank you very much for taking my questions. I should have a couple of follow-ups. One is back on the take rate. You talked about increasing the advertising take rate to the global comps, global benchmark in a matter of quarters, not years. In your opening remarks, you also talked about your commission take rate, I think, is below the global comps. Even it's good that you guys and your peers are raising your take rate, but your commission take rate is still quite a bit below the Amazon's, the [indiscernible], the eBay's, I was just wondering, are there structural reasons why you think the longer-term your commission take rate won't be close to the global peers? And is there any timing to reach that sort of goal? The second follow-up is back to the gaming booking. I know you talked quite a bit about the strong booking growth, which was amazing in second quarter, in particular. Previously, you have talked about double-digit booking growth for this year for Free Fire. I think the assumption was sort of low-teens, but given the particular strength you have seen last couple of quarters, are there reasons to expect the implied, the booking growth for Free Fire for 2024 should be going higher, if not, why not? Thank you.

For the take rate question, I think, for the ad take rate, as I mentioned, I think we will see the potential growth in the next few quarters within the years. And, of course, the base is different in different markets. So ultimately, it might be different numbers in different markets. On the commissions, I think, I would rather look at the totality, if you look at commission and ads et cetera. I don't think that is the reason they will be significantly below the global peers in the market that you mentioned. Yeah, I think, this reflects to our long-term guidance on how the EBITDA will be at 2% to 3% of the market.

In terms of the game booking, Free Fire booking guidance, right, for the rest of the year, yeah, I think you are right, it's a -- we do see strong momentum and continuing. And but at this moment, we want to be cautious, right? And since we just have for this very, very strong momentum for the past two quarters and we want to continually just focus on the effort what we have done, which proved to be productive. And if we continually seeing this trend and if we will update the market, we'll like update our investors timely and accordingly.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. MC Koh for any closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining today's call. We look forward to speaking to all of you again next quarter.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.