Charlie Mathis
Analyst · Raymond James
Thanks, Mike. As Mike indicated, we're disappointed with our fourth quarter financial results as gross margins declined with lower sales volume. These 2 items are the primary reason for the negative EPS impact between the non-GAAP EPS of $0.51 and our forecasted range. First, let me explain the variances to our forecast just to make clear what happened. I've included Slide number 5 showing the actual versus forecast for the sales and gross margins. As you see on this slide, the volume declined primarily in the Worldwide Barcode & Security segment. However, the gross margin miss was primarily in the Worldwide Communications & Services segment. As we indicated on our last call in early May, we were forecasting organic sales growth to be slightly positive year-over-year and expected big deals to normalize. During any quarter, our sales were back-end loaded with 40% occurring in the last month of the quarter. Also, as Mike indicated on our last call, KBZ is still the wild card in our forecasting and that was the case this quarter as well. The $48 million decline in sales volume from the midpoint of our sales range occurred primarily in our Worldwide Barcode & Security segment and reflected an 8% organic sales decline year-over-year. This followed 4% organic growth for the first nine months of fiscal year 2016. On a consolidated basis, the volume shortfall in net sales versus our forecast had a $0.12 negative impact on EPS. Our largest forecast miss was decline in the gross profit margin, a 9.4% versus 10% in our forecast. This had a negative EPS impact of $0.14. Most of the margin decline occurred in Worldwide Communications & Services. The gross margin for the segment was 12.1% compared to 13.7% in our forecast. Network1 in Brazil contributed most to the margin miss due to cost reported in the fourth quarter, which we do not believe will be repeatable in the future. These costs related to issues surrounding the acquisition, integration of systems and processes in Brazil and Chile. This represents the half the segment's miss. In addition, our North America communications businesses had lower-than-expected margins from the timing of vendor program recognition as well as a less favorable product and customer mix. Now turning to the quarter over prior year comparison on Slide 6 and 7. Net sales for the quarter -- for the current quarter increased 2% to $877 million compared to $857 million a year ago. The dollar impact on sales due to foreign currency translation was a negative $7.5 million, as expected. Net sales in constant currency, excluding acquisitions, declined 6% year-over-year for the quarter. Growth we had been experiencing in our wireless and networking business slowed down considerably this quarter. And looking at the gross margin comparison versus prior year, our fourth quarter 2016 gross profit was $83 million or 9.4% of net sales compared to $91 million or 10.7% of net sales a year ago. Less favorable vendor programs combined with the above-described impacts led to the decline. SG&A expenses, excluding amortization of intangible assets and acquisition costs, were $64 million or 7.3% of net sales compared to $63 million or 7.3% of net sales in the prior year quarter. For the quarter, bad debt expense increased to $4.8 million or 54 basis points sales due to increased reserves for specific accounts in North America and Brazil. As a percentage of sales, this is higher than our normalized level of 20 to 25 basis points. The increase in bad debt expense was offset by lower employee-related expenses. Our fourth quarter 2016 non-GAAP operating income was $18.9 million or 2.1% of net sales compared to $28.6 million or 3.3% in the prior year quarter. Non-GAAP operating margins for the Worldwide Barcode & Security decreased 71 basis points from a lower gross margin and higher bad debt expense. Non-GAAP operating margins for the Worldwide Communications & Services decreased 200 basis points as a result of the lower gross margin. Our effective tax rate was 30.5% for the fourth quarter 2016 and 34% for the prior year period. The lower tax rate was from U.S. federal and state tax credits, a mix of more international business and less profitability than expected. For fiscal year 2016, our effective tax rate totaled 33.7%. For the fiscal year 2017 forecast, we are using a 34.5% effective tax rate. Fourth quarter 2016 GAAP EPS of $0.50 decreased 12% year-over-year and non-GAAP EPS decreased 23%. Average diluted shares for the fourth quarter 2016 totaled 25.9 million, down 10% from the year earlier period as a result of share repurchases. Now, let me summarize our results for the full year. Our fiscal year 2016 net sales of $3.5 billion represents a 10% increase from the prior year, but basically unchanged in constant currency, excluding acquisitions. The gross margin for the fiscal year 2016 was 10%, close to 10.2% for the fiscal year 2015 and consistent with our historical average for many years. Non-GAAP operating income decreased 5% to $109 million. Our non-GAAP operating margin 3.1% from $114 million in the prior year. These results include $6.6 million of higher bad debt expense and an estimated $3.8 million negative impact of foreign currency translation. Additionally, we have included results for our KBZ acquisitions for 10 months in the current year, and KBZ performed very well. Our fiscal year 2016 non-GAAP EPS was $2.71, up 4% from the prior year non-GAAP EPS of $2.61. Now shifting to the balance sheet and capital allocation plan. Our working capital measures are referenced on Slide 12 in our presentation. Our DSO at 57 days, came in higher than our typical range and reflect the aging of customer-specific accounts in North America and Brazil. Our reseller financial services teams around the globe remained focused on ensuring appropriate underwriting standards are in place and finding ways to collateralize and recover what we have reserved. Inventory turns and paid for inventory days are within our typical range. Our segment presidents ensure that we have the appropriate level of inventory to meet customer demand and are receiving the appropriate returns for the inventory we carry. Based on gross margins we achieved this quarter, our inventory turn should have been higher. Our balance sheet remains very strong. Turning to Slide 14. At June 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $61 million and debt of $77 million for net debt of $15 million. Our leverage totaled approximately 0.13x trailing 12-month EBITDA, which was below our targeted leverage of 1x. Our ROIC was 13.3% for the full year, which was impacted by the decline in our fourth quarter profitability. We generated $52 million of cash from operations for the full year and completed a $120 million share repurchase authorization in June. The Board of Directors has approved the 22nd $120 million share repurchase authorization for the next three years. Our capital allocation priorities remain the same; organic growth, strategic acquisitions and share repurchases. We closed on Intelisys acquisition this afternoon under the agreement the all-cash transaction includes an initial purchase price of $83.6 million for 52% of the estimated purchase price and earn-out payments based on EBITDA over the next 4 years for the remaining 48% of the estimated purchase price. Our current estimated range for total earn-out payments based on an EBITDA multiple is between $100 million and $150 million. But there is no minimum or maximum payment. Intelisys' net assets are very small, so substantially all of the purchase price, which will include the present value of the estimated earn-out payments, will be allocated to the tangible assets and goodwill. Therefore, post acquisition, our financial statements will include a significant increase in intangible amortization and change in fair value of contingent consideration. Accordingly for the first full year after closing, we expect the Intelisys acquisition to be dilutive to GAAP earnings per share and accretive to non-GAAP earnings per share, excluding intangible amortization, change in fair value, and change in contingent consideration and acquisition cost. I'd like to highlight a few things about the Intelisys business model. First, working capital requirements are very low, reflecting the services model. Intelisys gets commissions from its suppliers, referred to as gross commissions and then shares these commissions with its subagents. This net amount that is the gross commissions less payments to subagents is reported as net revenues in the financial statements. For this first full year after closing, Intelisys' net revenues are estimated to total over $34 million, with a 45% to 50% estimated EBITDA margin. With Intelisys, we are adding a small amount of top line revenue with a much larger impact to our bottom line margins and EBITDA. Now turning to our forecast on Slide 15, and I want to give additional color on the forecast. We expect net sales for the first quarter fiscal year 2017 to range from $875 million to $925 million and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to range from $0.60 to $0.68. The forecast does not include projections for the Intelisys acquisition. Our forecast assumes a 3% decline in organic sales, which represents a 5% decline in Worldwide Communications & Services and a 1% decline in Worldwide Barcode & Security. In the forecast, we expect the gross margin to improve to 9.8% and a very small foreign currency translation benefit. The foreign exchange rates used in our forecast are summarized in our presentation slides. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Mike.