Thank you for standing by, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the Star Bulk Carriers Conference Call on the Second Quarter 2022 Financial Results. We have with us Mr. Petros Pappas, Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Hamish Norton, President; Mr. Nicos Rescos, Chief Operating Officer; Mr. Simos Spyrou and Mr. Christos Begleris, Co-Chief Financial Officers of the company. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. There will be presentation followed by question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I must advise you that this conference is being recorded today. I will now pass the floor to one of your speakers today, Mr. Begleris. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Operator. I am Christos Begleris, Co-CFO of Star Bulk Carriers and I would like to welcome you to our conference call regarding our financial results for the second quarter of 2022. Before we begin, I kindly ask you to take a moment to read the Safe Harbor statement on slide number two of our presentation. In today’s presentation, we will go through our second quarter results, cash evolution during the quarter, an overview of our balance sheet, an update on our scrubbers and vessel operations, the latest from ESG front and the views on industry fundamentals before opening up for questions. Let us now turn to slide three of the presentation for a summary of our second quarter 2022 highlights. Net income for the second quarter amounted to $200.2 million and adjusted net income of $204.5 million or $2 adjusted earnings per share. Adjusted EBITDA was at $258.3 million for the quarter. For the second quarter, as per our existing dividend policy, we declared a dividend per share of $1.65, payable on or about September 8, 2022. The graph on the bottom of the page highlights the cumulative performance over the last 12 months, which illustrates the strength of the platform in the robust dry bulk market. Our last 12 months’ adjusted EBITDA is $1.12 billion and adjusted net income is $907 million. Over the same period, we have returned a cumulative dividend of $6.55 per share or $674 million to our shareholders. In the top right of the page, you will see our daily figures per vessel for the quarter. Our time charter equivalent rate was $30,451 per vessel per day. Our combined daily OpEx and net cash G&A expenses per vessel per day amounted to $5,684. Therefore our TCE less OpEx less G&A is $24,767 per…

Thank you, Christos. In slide six, I would like to update investors about our scrubber investment. We are pleased to report and as of end of June [Technical Difficulty] in a time span of 2.5 years we have reported $250 million scrubber investment. This cost includes unrelated capital expenditure, as well as offhire costs involved in the installation of our scrubbers. On the scrubber utilization front, Star Bulk [Technical Difficulty] 108,000 scrubber operating days, with an [Technical Difficulty] 99.5% of system availability for us. [Technical Difficulty] bottomline, based on consumption of approximately 700,000 tons of HSFO consumed per annum. Indicatively, the average Hi5 spread achieved during the second quarter was $323 per ton. As you can see at the bottom part of the slide, the total cost Hi5 spread is in backwardation versus [Technical Difficulty]. Please turn to slide seven, where we provide an operational update. Operating expenses excluding non-recurring expenses was at $4,674 for the quarter -- second quarter 2022. Net cash G&A expenses were $1,010 per vessel per day for the same period. Despite continued adverse COVID-related expenses and inflationary pressures, which have a direct impact on our operating expenses, the combination of our in-house management and scale of the group, enables us to sustain a very competitive cost base and maintain our position as the lowest cost operator amongst our peers. In addition, we continue to rate at the top among our listed peers in terms of Rightship Ratings. Slide eight provides the fleet snapshot and some guidance around our future dry bulk and ballast water system expenses for the next 12 months and relevant total offhire days. Our expected dry bulk expense for the next 12 months is estimated at $33.2 million for the dry bulk 33 vessels with another $13.4 million towards our vessel upgrade CapEx. In total, we expect to have approximately 1,000 offhire days for the full 12-month period. We anticipate that 98% of our fleet will be fitted with ballast water systems by the end of Q4 of 2022. The above numbers are based on current estimates around dry bulk and retrofit planning, vessel employment and yard capacity. I will now pass the floor to Chief Strategy Officer, Charis Plakantonaki for an ESG update.

Thank you, Nicos. Please turn to slide nine, where we highlight our continued leadership on the ESG front. A major new redevelopment is a decision by Star Bulk’s Board of Directors to establish an ESG Committee, which will guide and support management on environmental, social, and governance matters in order to ensure that the company promote and integrate ESG in its strategy and business operations. On the environmental front, Star Bulk has taken part for a second year in the annual assessment cycle for the Carbon Disclosure Project. In addition, we are actively participating in the Iron Ore Consortium along with some of our major charters to assess feasibility of the green corridor on the Australia-East Asia route up to 2050. Furthermore, in an effort to continuously improve on our sustainability performance, we have participated in the annual S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment, which will provide us with a score and ranking based on various financially relevant ESG criteria. Finally, from the societal point of view, Star Bulk has partnered with UNICEF to provide psychosocial support to refugee women and children who have fled to Greece as a result of the war in Ukraine. I will now pass the floor to our CEO, Petros Pappas, for a market update and his closing remarks.

Thank you, Charis. Please turn to slide 10 for a brief update of supply. During the first half of 2022, a total of $15.6 million deadweight was delivered and $1.8 million deadweight was sent to demolition for a net fleet growth of $13.8 million deadweight for 1.5% year-to-date and 3% year-on-year. The supply outlook is the best in the recent history of dry bulk shipping. The order book stands at only 7.1% of the fleet, with just $9.4 million deadweight reported as firm orders between January and June. Uncertainty on future propulsion, along with surging shipbuilding costs has helped keeping new orders under control, while shipyards continue to fill 2025 capacity with more profitable to the shipyards vessels. Furthermore, despite the correction of global steel prices during the second quarter, inflated scrub prices may simplify the demolition of overage tonnage without scrubbers during seasonal downturns. We expect this to intensify after the implementation of the EEXI-CII regulations that come into effect as of 2023. The average steaming speed of the fleet has decreased by 2.8% during the last year to 11.3 knots, as a result of a strong increase of bunker costs. We expect oil prices and bunker cost to remain inflated for the next quarters amidst the sanctions imposed by the western countries on Russia. This situation, along with the new environmental regulations will continue to incentivize slow steaming and will also support wider scrubber savings. Global port congestion and especially Capesize congestion in China had experienced a decline during the last months as pandemic-related restrictions are easing and reduced arrivals help ease for delays. Having said that, congestion for smaller vessel types remains at high levels due to changes in trading patterns and seasonal bottlenecks. As a result of the above trends, net fleet growth is projected to…

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] I show our first question comes from the line of Amit Mehrotra from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. This is Chris Robertson on for Amit. Thanks for taking our call.

Hi, Chris.

I just wanted to ask. So you have relatively young Newcastlemaxes and Ultramax vessels as well. So you spent quite a bit of time talking about the scrubber premiums. But could I ask about the premiums you are getting or uplift you are getting on the younger eco vessels?

Yeah. You are talking, Chris, about the premiums due to vessels being under as opposed to due to the scrubbers?

Correct.

Well, the younger vessels have lower consumption than the older vessels and therefore in effect, they have -- on the one hand, they have the advantage of being eco, on the other hand by burning more -- less tons they get less over scrubber advantage. So, for example, Newcastlemaxes burns, let’s say, 40 tons whereas an older Capesize burns 50 tons. On the one hand, I have said, the eco advantage, but on the other hand, it burns 10 tons worth of scrubber benefit less.

Okay. Yeah. That’s fair. Thanks for clarifying that. My next question is on, you guys mentioned the speed of the fleet around 11.3 knots at the moment. How do you foresee that kind of evolving over the next few quarters and into 2023? And could you quantify or kind of look at the effective capacity reduction that you expect?

Okay. It depends on two things. First of all, it depends on the price of bunkers, and second, it depends on what -- how the market rates are. So, it would -- the highest speed would be at a very -- at very high rates and very low bunker prices and the lowest speed would be with very high bunker prices and very low speeds. We expect the old bunker remain where they are, not to fall much, and therefore, we also expect that -- we expect also the market to be decent during the next four months, five months, especially towards for the quarter. Therefore, we think that speed will remain where it is at around 11 point range knots give or take. Now as vessels [Technical Difficulty] time, 1 knot difference from 11.3 to 12.3 is about -- I think that’s about a 9% reduction or 8.5% reduction and you multiply that by 60%, so that’s about 5% effect on supply. So 1 knot less or 1 knot more in speed would be plus or minus 5% on supply.

Okay. Yeah. Thanks for that. My last question here is around the unwinding of the Chinese port congestion and also as it relates to the containership market. So let’s say containership rates fall from here and port congestion eases, what do you think the impact will be to the dry bulk rates?

Well, we -- first of all, congestion has -- Chinese concession has eased mostly on the Capesize sector. I think I was reading a figure of like 68% less congestion this year than last year, which we think actually it has run its course. If anything and as we expect to have much more iron ore trade during the next four months, five months, we believe that for the Capesize possession will actually increase in China going forward. Regarding Supramax containership market and Supramax vessels, yes, if containerships rates collapse, this will have a negative effect on Supramax. However, I was just -- last week I saw that containers from a well-known public -- big public shipping company fixed for three years with like $54,000. So it doesn’t seem to me that the containership market is yet that much affected to have a major impact on the Supramaxes. Also, one interesting thing is that, congestion on Supramxes is actually increased by a bit like 6%. So, all-in-all, on the Capesize question, I think, we will see more congestion. On the Supramax question, it will have an effect but I don’t think it’s going to be immediate.

All right. Yeah. Thank you very much for the time and congrats on the solid quarter.

Thank you very much.

Thanks, Chris.

Thank you. And I show our next question comes from the line of Omar Nokta from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Hey guys. Good afternoon. Just wanted to…

Hi, Omar.

Hey, Hamish. Hey. Yeah. Just wanted to ask you, you guys have secured several new credit facilities and extended your maturities, lowered your cost base. You now have 12 unencumbered ships. I guess, are you going to give us maybe a sense of why you have those down in terms of market value? And then maybe give us a sense of what you are thinking about those ships going forward, are those sales candidates or they are just for flexibility sake?

So, well, we are on -- as I think you can appreciate, we make a policy of not discussing the value of our fleet in terms of backing for ship. Because frankly, the ships are worth more in our hands than in the hands of others because of the way we operate them. And the ships that are unencumbered are unencumbered more or less by happenstance. They are not particularly sales candidates.

Okay. Thank you. That’s pretty clear. And this is maybe impacting a little nuance I noticed and then maybe just so happens to give this way, but you spent $20 million on the buyback this year, you are buying at an average price, let’s say, $25 and the issue close to $20 million also under the ATM at $31. So, definitely good pricing on both counts, but is that a coincidence that they are lined up like that $20 million or…

Yeah.

…are we misunderstood?

It’s not a coincidence. We basically had an arbitrage situation lined up where we could issue shares and buy assets in a way that was very advantageous for the shareholders and sort of in the middle of that the arbitrage situation started becoming less profitable and our share price starting to drop. So basically we spent precisely the money that we raised by issuing shares on buying back shares at a lower price and so in effect retired some shares to give our net cost.

Okay. And so do you think that would be, how you guys approach it in the future and…

Well, hopefully, in the future, we will be able to issue shares and buy lot of vessels in a way that very profitable for the shareholders.

Yes. Yes. Very good. And one final one, I just -- I saw in the cash flow statement a $35 million pre-bill outlay. Just -- I don’t think I have noticed that before and just wondering what that -- could you give me a sense of what that was for?

Omar, this is Simos. This is -- this was just a short-term investment we place below six months, but since the maturity was after the end of the quarter June 30th, under U.S. GAAP we have to report them not in our cost, but in our investment portfolio. However, you know that, these products, these pre-bills are considered to be in reality cost. So we consider them costs and we add them back to the cash balance for the calculation of the dividend, all of these bills are maturing within the third quarter.

Got it. Okay. Thanks for that. Makes sense. Thank you and I will turn it over.

Thanks, Omar.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Climent Molins from Investor’s Edge. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. I want to start by asking about the dividend. You have declared another very strong distribution equal to like the quarter one payout despite the slightly lower cash balances at the end of the quarter there. What has been the driver behind this decision and should you expect this to be rebalanced looking at the remainder of the year?

Climent, it’s the same dividend policy. It’s not a management decision. The cash balance divided by the number of shares outstanding, came up with $1.65 based on the formula and it was a pretty mechanical operation, and I think, you can anticipate that we would go through the same basically mechanical calculation every quarter.

So, Climent, this is Christos. So it was basically a coincidence that the dividend for the second quarter just equaled the figures of the dividend of the first quarter. Essentially, as Hamish said, what counts is the exact cash balance at the end of each quarter and the number of shares.

Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. It makes sense. Your extensive program, retrofit program is yielding outstanding results given the outside spreads kind of seen as of late and although the spread in the futures market is slower course should continue to provide a significant tailwind. Is there any willingness to hedge part of your 2023 bunker consumption or do you prefer to remain open?

At the moment, there is quite a steep discount of the 2023 forward curve on the spread compared to the prices that we are getting now. Indicatively, the spread in Singapore is in the high $200s per ton, close to $300 per ton. And the calendar 2023 right now is at levels around $160 per ton, $170 per ton. Even essentially that we have repaid the entire investment and even our expectation of a strong energy markets and a widespread in 2023. The talk right now even what we know now is basically while the spot market also the spread. Of course, we may change decision in the future.

All right. Thank you very much for the color. Thank you for taking my questions and congratulations for another excellent quarter.

Thanks, Climent.

Thank you. That concludes our Q&A session for today. At this time, I’d like to turn the call back over to Mr. Petros Pappas, CEO for closing remarks.

Thank you, Operator. No further remarks. Have a nice summer to everybody.

Thank you everyone for participating in today’s conference call. This concludes the program. You may all disconnect.