Welcome to today’s GSC Investment Corp’s third quarter fiscal 2010 financial results conference call. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Rich Allorto, the company’s Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, Sir.

Thank you. I would like to welcome everyone to GSC Investment Corp’s third quarter fiscal 2010 earnings conference call. : The third quarter 2010 shareholder presentation is available in the investor relations section of our website at www.GSCInvestmentCorp.com. I would now like to introduce our Chief Executive Officer, Seth Katzenstein, who will be making a few introductory remarks.

Thank you Rick, and welcome to all of our shareholders. During our fiscal third quarter ended November 30th, we observed a broadening of the economy’s modest recovery. While economic activity remains at a low level we have seen an increase from prior periods and as a result, credit spreads have tightened considerably and the credit markets are continuing to stabilize. While these developments have been encouraging to the long-term prospects of our business we continue to face the cumulative effects of the recession on our portfolio company. As a result, we believe the logical path is to continue with capital preservation and debt reduction. On November 13, 2009 we declared a dividend of $1.825 per share payable on December 31, 2009. Shareholders had the option to receive the payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock provided the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.1 million or $0.25 per share. Based on shareholder election the dividend consisted of $2.1 million in cash and approximately 8.6 million shares of common stock representing 104% of our outstanding common stock prior to the dividend payment. The number of shares of common stock comprising the stock portion was calculated based on a price of approximately $1.51 per share which equals the volume weighted average trading price per share of the common stock on December 24th and 28th, 2009. The dividend includes the balance of the company’s fiscal 2009 taxable income and a significant portion of the company’s fiscal 2010 taxable income. As discussed on previous conference calls we are continuing to identify and evaluate strategic opportunities. These discussions are ongoing as we actively consider and evaluate potential paths towards maximizing long-term shareholder value. As you are aware, federal securities laws limit the amount and type of information we can disclose about such opportunities. While we will provide additional information as events warrant, we remind you that there is no guarantee that any transaction will be consummated. I will return later with a review of our portfolio but I would now like to turn the call back over to Rick to review our third quarter financial results.

Thank you Seth. GSC Investment Corp.’s net income for the third quarter ended November 30, 2009 was $9.1 million or $1.01 per share. Our net investment income was $869,000 or $0.10 per share and our net gain on investments was $8.3 million or $0.91 per share. Our net asset value per share was $3.80 at November 30th compared to $6.91 per share at August 31st. The decrease in NAV per share from August 31 was primarily the result of the distribution of 8.6 million shares of common stock on December 31st where the stock portion of the dividend declared on November 13th. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles the number of shares outstanding used to calculate the NAV per share as of November 30th was retroactively adjusted to reflect the additional shares issued as a result of the stock dividend. Excluding the issuance of these additional shares the NAV per share would have been $7.76 as of November 30th. Our total investment income for the quarter was $3.5 million, a decrease of approximately $2.9 million versus the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Our investment income was comprised of $3 million of interest income, $511,000 of management fee income associated with our investment [audio break] and $57,000 of miscellaneous bank interest and fees. The decrease in total investment income versus the third quarter of fiscal 2009 is primarily attributable to a reduction of $1.1 million of income from our CLO, an increase of $600,000 in the allowance for repaired loans and bonds and a decrease in market discount income and the LIBOR rate earned on floating investments between the periods of $600,000 and finally a reduction of $300,000 of income from investments that were sold or realized. For the third quarter our total operating expenses before expense waiver and reimbursement…

Thank you Rick. Before we open to questions I would like to review the composition and performance of our investment portfolio. As of November 30th 15% of our investment portfolio was invested in first lien term loans, 29% in second lien term loans, 27.5% in senior secured notes which means more than 71% of our portfolio was invested in senior secured obligations and 21% of our portfolio was invested in the equity trench of the CLO that is collateralized by 96% senior secured, first lien term loans. We believe that our strategy of investing in senior security investments increases the probability of meaningful recoveries in troubled investments. Our corporate debt portfolio is diversified with investments around a variety of industries and issuers. As of November 30th we had 38 corporate debt investments in 29 portfolio companies across 20 industries with an average portfolio company investment of $2.8 million. At November 30th there were 16 portfolio companies on our watch list, down from 17 in the prior quarter. During the quarter we added Bankruptcy Management, Energy Alloy and Targus Group to the watch list and removed Advanstar, Lyondell Chemicals, McMillan Companies and Stronhaven. Subsequent to the end of the quarter we received full par repayment on our investment in GXS Worldwide and Edgen Murray generating $4 million in proceeds which as previously mentioned were used to pay down our credit facility. Additionally, these repayments increased the company’s net equity by $867,000 due to the reversal of previously recorded unrealized losses. To give you a better sense of the portfolio restructuring activity at November 30th 13 portfolio companies were performing with no material restructuring activity, an additional six companies have been restricted within the past year and 10 portfolio companies were actively being restructured. Subsequent to the end of the quarter three of the active restructurings were completed and two performing investments made full par repayments. In closing, I would like to thank all of our shareholders for their support and I would now like to open the call for questions.

(Operator Instructions) The first question comes from the line of Greg Mason - Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Greg Mason - Stifel Nicolaus & Co. : Can you talk about the borrowing base? Reading through your Q it looks like the borrowing base is $12 million down from $35 million last quarter. It seems like you took companies off of the watch list and had write ups in the portfolio. Can you kind of discuss the accounting between those and what caused the borrowing base to go down?

I will take the first part on the borrowing base. The primary aspect of it is the CCC excess concentration. To the extent we have a CCC name that increases in value you will see it on the financials but you won’t see any incremental benefit within the borrowing base because of the excess concentration. As we continue to exit some positions and have some of the repayments and refinancing that are non-CCC, the total portfolio size shrinks and so does the CCC basket therefore increasing the excess concentration. Greg Mason - Stifel Nicolaus & Co. : Were there any new companies that were downgraded to CCC in the basket?

I don’t believe there were any CCC downgrades. No there were not. Greg Mason - Stifel Nicolaus & Co. : You gave us this number but could you talk again to the CLO Payment of fees and what you received from the CLO. Can you run me through those numbers again?

We haven’t received it yet. The determination date has passed. The payment date is on the 22nd. We know what the amounts are. We will receive the full senior and sub-fee for the current quarter which is $510,000. We will receive $729,000 of previously accrued but unpaid subordinated management fees related to prior quarters. That will leave a balance on that accrued sub-fee of $97,000. Greg Mason - Stifel Nicolaus & Co. : When the CLO resumes the cash payments in April can you refresh my memory, does that have any impact to the income statement or are those fees already being accrued in and you will get them in cash going forward?

From the management fee perspective we continue to accrue the full senior and sub-fee so the equity turning back on is purely just a working capital issue. On the equity piece itself if you recall we accrue at the effective interest method which last quarter was 0.09% so effectively non-accrual. For the current quarter with these revised and updated models our effective interest rate is just under 11% so we accrue at 11%. So to the extent the equity distributions are made we will become current on that 11%. Partially current.

Mr. Allorto there are no further questions by phone.

Thank you for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you when we report our year-end results.