Rayonier Inc. (RYN) Q3 2020 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Welcome, and thank you for joining Rayonier’s Third Quarter 2020 Teleconference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Today’s conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Now I will turn the meeting over to Mr. Collin Mings, Vice President, Capital Markets and Strategic Planning. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to Rayonier’s Investor Teleconference covering third quarter earnings. Our earnings statements and financial supplement were released yesterday afternoon and are available on our website at rayonier.com. In these presentations, we include forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of federal securities laws. Our earnings release and SEC filings list some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we may make. They are also referenced on Page 2 of our financial supplement. Throughout these presentations, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are defined and reconciled to the nearest GAAP measure in our earnings release and supplemental materials. With that, let’s start our teleconference with opening comments from Dave Nunes, President and CEO. Dave?

Thanks, Collin, and welcome aboard. I’ll begin the call by making some high level comments before turning it over to Mark McHugh, our Senior Vice President and CFO, to review our consolidated financial results. Then we’ll ask Doug Long, Senior Vice President, Forest Resources to comment on our U.S. and New Zealand timber results. And following the review of our timber results segments, Mark will discuss our real estate results as well as our outlook for the remainder of 2020. We generated adjusted EBITDA of $67 million and pro forma net income of $7.5 million or $0.06 per share in the third quarter. We delivered strong operating results across our three regional timber segments, as well as within our real estate business. Despite facing some ongoing challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we benefited from robust new residential construction activity, continued strong repair and remodel spending, improve demand from key export log markets, and strong market dynamics for our pulpwood customers. Our collective results underscore the strength of the markets we operate in, the diversity of our portfolio and the resiliency of our business. Despite strong operating results, we had to navigate multiple casualty events during the quarter, including Hurricane Laura in the U.S. South, as well as wildfires in Oregon. Our thoughts go out to all those who were affected by these tragic events. While we sustained some property damage, fortunately, no Rayonier employees were injured. From an operational standpoint, we expect only limited near-term disruptions to our business, given the geographic diversity of our footprint. While the direct impact to us was limited, we’ve taken steps to help those communities get back on their feet through financial donations to disaster relief efforts. Drilling down to our different reporting segments, our Southern Timber segment generated adjusted EBITDA of $26 million for the quarter, which was 16% above the prior year third quarter. Results were bolstered by a 16% increase in harvest volumes and 8% higher sawlog stumpage prices relative to the prior year quarter. Sawlog pricing benefited from healthy mill demand, amidst record lumber prices, as well as growth in log exports along the Atlantic coast. In our Pacific Northwest Timber segment, we achieved adjusted EBITDA $9 million, up substantially from the prior year quarter, driven by an 18% increase in weighted average log prices, as well as the addition of 55,000 tons of volume from the Pope Resources assets. In our New Zealand Timber segment, we reported adjusted EBITDA of $18 million, slightly above the prior year quarter. Modestly lower log prices were offset by a slight increase in harvest volumes as well as higher carbon credit sales. In contrast to our prior two quarters during which we experienced COVID-related lockdowns, our New Zealand business was fully operational throughout the third quarter. Our Real Estate segment reported very strong third quarter adjusted EBITDA of $22 million, driven by the sale of over 10,000 acres of rural land. Overall, we have continued to see healthy demand across all our real estate sales categories, which we will elaborate on later in the call. Before turning the call back over to Mark, I’d like to provide a brief update on our ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The work from home model we instituted for all U.S. employees in mid-March remains in place and field employees continued to observe enhanced safety guidelines. Given the current state of the pandemic, we anticipate remaining in this mode in many of our locations through at least the end of the year. While the pandemic has been extremely disruptive to all aspects of life, I continue to believe that Rayonier’s been managing through it very well. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, our team has managed to operate very efficiently and has also advanced several important strategic initiatives this year, most notably, the closing and integration of the Pope Resources acquisition, and has continued to respond in a nimble manner to rapidly changing market conditions. On that note, I want to reiterate how pleased we’ve been with the Pope Resources transaction to date. Since closing the deal on May 8, the collaboration among our employees has been tremendous, supporting our view that the combined organization would benefit from the blending of best practices and the talent associated with each company. We’re also already seeing the benefits associated with our increased scale and operational flexibility in the Pacific Northwest. We have managed to achieve synergies modestly ahead of our initial estimates. With that, let me turn it over to Mark, to review our financial results and highlights from the quarter.

Thanks, Dave. To start, I’d like to briefly comment on the write-offs this quarter associated with Hurricane Laura and the wildfires in Oregon. In total, these casualty events resulted in write-offs of $15 million, of which approximately $8 million was attributable to Rayonier and the balance was attributable to the non-controlling interest in the Timber Funds business. We have included these charges as a pro forma item in our third quarter results due to the nature of these events and the infrequency with which they materially impact our results. As it relates to our Southern Timber segment, Hurricane Laura made landfall in Louisiana on August 27, impacting nearly 8,000 acres of our timberland properties in the state. We anticipate being able to salvage approximately 1,000 acres based on existing mill quotas and the condition of the damaged timber. As a result of the hurricane, we wrote-off timber basis in the amount of $6 million during the quarter. Moving to the Oregon wildfires, our Timber Funds segment was directly impacted by two fires during the quarter, specifically the Beachie Creek fire in Northwest Oregon impacted roughly 9,000 acres of land owned by ORM Timber Fund II, and the Slater fire in Southwest Oregon impacted about 1,000 acres of land owned by ORM Timber Fund IV. Rayonier manages both funds and owns a 20% economic interest in Fund II and a 15% interest in Fund IV. Based on our latest assessment, we estimate that approximately 60% of the damaged merchantable timber will be salvageable. As a result of the wildfires, we wrote-off timber basis of approximately $9 million on a consolidated basis, however, based on our economic interest in these funds only $2 million of this write-off was attributable to Rayonier. I’ll now switch gears and provide an overview of our third quarter results starting on Page 5 with our financial highlights. Sales for the quarter totaled $199 million, while operating income was $2 million and net loss attributable to Rayonier was $1 million or a loss of $0.01 per share. On a pro forma basis, net income was $7.5 million or $0.06 per share. The pro forma adjustments for the third quarter included the timber write-offs previously discussed as well as costs related to the Pope Resources merger. Third quarter adjusted EBITDA of $67 million was well above the prior year quarter adjusted EBITDA of $43 million. All three timber operating segments, as well as our real estate segment posted stronger results relative to the prior year quarter. These positive variances versus the prior year quarter were partially offset by a higher corporate and other expenses as well as a slight loss in our trading segment. On the bottom of Page 5, we provide an overview of our capital resources and liquidity at quarter end, as well as a comparison to year end 2019. Our cash available for distribution or CAD for the first nine months of the year was $124 million compared to $116 million in the prior year period, primarily due to higher adjusted EBITDA and lower CapEx, partially offset by higher cash interest paid. A reconciliation of CAD to cash provided by operating activities and other GAAP measures is provided on Page 8 in the financial supplement. We closed the quarter with $75 million of cash, and $1.3 billion of debt, both of which exclude cash and debt attributable to the Timber Fund segment, which is non-recourse to Rayonier. Our net debt at $1.2 billion represented 26% of our enterprise value based on our closing stock price at quarter end. Consistent with our nimble approach to capital allocation, we established an at-the-market or ATM equity offering program in September. While we did not issue any shares under the ATM program during the quarter, we view this program as a tool that will allow us to opportunistically access equity capital in a very efficient manner. I’ll now turn the call over to Doug to provide a more detailed review of our timber results.

Thanks Mark. Good morning. Let’s start on Page 9 with our Southern Timber segment. Adjusted EBITDA in the third quarter of $26 million was $4 million above the prior year quarter. Results reflect strong demand across much of our U.S. South footprint for both pulpwood and sawtimber. Specifically, third quarter harvest volume of approximately 1.5 million tons was 16% above the prior quarter. Domestic demand from sawmills has been robust and we also remain encouraged by the growth in log exports along the Atlantic Coasts as demand from China for Southern Yellow pine has rebounded in response to the tariff waivers introduced earlier this year. We are well-positioned to capitalize on this market opportunity moving forward, which provides an added layer of market demand. Turning to pricing. Average sawlog stumpage pricing was $25 per ton, an 8% increase compared to the prior year quarter. The improvement in sawlog pricing was attributable to stronger demand for both domestic and export grade timber. Pricing also benefited from a geographic mix weighted toward our stronger Atlantic Coastal markets. Pulpwood pricing was flat relative to the prior year period. Third quarter results include a modest amount of salvage volume due to Hurricane Laura. We expect salvage activity to increase during the fourth quarter, anticipate the ramp up and these efforts to lead to a short-term drag on pulpwood pricing. Third quarter non-timber income of $5 million was $3 million below the prior quarter, due to a reduction in pipeline easement revenue. Recall that 2019 marked a record high year for our non-timber income business. Moving to our Pacific Northwest Timber segment on Page 10. Adjusted EBITDA of $9 million was $6 million above the prior year quarter. This was primarily driven by a significantly improved pricing environment, as well as an increase in volume tripled to the Pope Resources acquisition. Sawmills in the region are generally running at full capacity, with the surge in lumber prices translating into increased profitability for the mills, log pricing dynamics have certainly improved. However, export market demand has been relatively sluggish given the increased supply of European logs and lumber into China. Pacific Northwest harvest volumes augmented by our acquisition of Pope Resources were also favorable. Of the 346,000 tons harvested in the third quarter, 55,000 tons represent volume from the acquired Pope Resources timberlands. At $93 per ton, our average delivered sawlog price during third quarter was at its highest level since 2018 and up 19% from prior quarter. The strength in pricing primarily reflects robust demand due to the surge in lumber prices over the past several months, as well as a higher percentage of Douglas fir as a result of the Pope Resources acquisition. Meanwhile, pulpwood pricing fell 15% relative to prior quarter due to weaker export markets and higher sawmill residuals. As it relates to our acquisition of Pope Resources, we continue to be pleased by our integration efforts. Our operational flexibility has been enhanced within the Pacific Northwest and we’re seeing the benefits of our increased scale and geography diversity as our team acted swiftly to optimize harvest plans, while in the recent wildfires in Oregon. But we believe it could take some time for the operating environment in Oregon to normalize do substantial salvage efforts upon on the recent fires. We expect stable domestic market conditions fueled by strong lumber prices to persist in Washington well into next year. Page 11 shows results in key operating metrics for New Zealand Timber segment. Adjusted EBITDA in the third quarter of $18 million was comparable to a year ago. Third quarter harvest volume of 776,000 tons was up 3% compared to the prior year quarter. We were fully operational throughout third quarter and as discussed on our earnings call last quarter, our team has done incredible job in resuming production and making up a good portion of the lost volume after the government mandated lockdown earlier this year. Turning to pricing. Average deliver prices for export sawtimber decreased 1% from the prior year to $94 per ton. Demand for Radiata pine from China remains very robust. This species continues to serve a wide range of end-users with demand from plywood and furniture manufacturers, particularly strong at present. However, persistently high China log inventories through the second quarter and to start the third quarter as well as increased competition from lower cost European log and lumber imports have been a constraint on pricing. That said, we saw an 80% increase in daily consumption during the third quarter, which has brought three year pine port inventory back into a healthy supply demand balance. Softer export demand increase domestic log supply, creating some downward pressure on domestic pricing, specifically average delivery prices for domestic sawtimber decreased 7% from the prior year period to $70 per ton. Meanwhile, the average domestic pulpwood price fell 10% as compared to the prior quarter, but it’s increased relative to earlier this year. I’ll now briefly discuss the results from our Timber Fund segment. Highlight on Page 12, the Timber Fund segment generated consolidated EBITDA of $1 million in the third quarter on harvest volume of 110,000 tons. Adjusted EBITDA, which reflects the look through contribution from the funds was $200,000. As noted in our press release, consolidated EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA in the Timber Fund segment are pro forma for the write-offs associated with the fires that Mark discussed earlier. Lastly, in our Timber Trading segment, we generated negative adjusted EBITDA of $600,000 in the third quarter. Typically our Trading segment has very low margins and it’s designed to augment our fee timber export sales. In the third quarter we incurred increased port storage and shipping fees in China associated with COVID disruptions, which contributed to this negative EBITDA result. I’ll now turn it back over to Mark to cover real estate results. Mark?

Thanks, Doug. As highlighted on Page 13, our real estate segment delivered strong results in the third quarter. Sales totaled $29 million on roughly 10,600 acres sold at an average price of over $2,300 per acre, as well as a conservation easement sale of $3 million. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $22 million. Sales in the Improved Development category totaled $1.3 million highlighted by the sale of 15 lots in our Wildlight development project, North of Jacksonville, Florida for $1 million or $65,000 per lot. We also close on our first post-merger land sale from legacy Pope Resources property in Washington consisting of one industrial lot in Kitsap County for $300,000. In the rural category, sales totaled $23 million on roughly 10,500 acres sold at an average price of $2,200 per acre. The category was highlighted by a 7,300 acre sale for $14 million or $1,900 per acre, across four counties in Georgia and a 1,400 acre sale for $3 million or approximately $2,100 per acre in South Carolina. We also continue to see robust demand for a rural places program during the quarter. We closed on 28 lots totaling 340 acres for $2 million or approximately $6,300 per acre. We believe this program may benefit in a post-COVID environment as the growth and work-from-home arrangements make rural living outside of city and suburban centers, more feasible for a larger portion of the population. Lastly, we closed on a 2,150 acre Conservation Easement sales in Washington for $3 million or roughly $1,450 per acre. The property that the Conservation Easement covers was acquired as part of the merger with Pope Resources. As noted in our earnings release, we began reporting Conservation Easement sales as a new sales category within the real estate segment this quarter. Since Conservation Easement sales involve the sale of certain land use rights rather than an outright sale of the land, these sales are not reflected in our average per acre metrics for the segment. We’re optimistic about the prospect of additional Conservation Easement’s opportunities going forward. As they allow us to capture the HBU value of certain properties, or retaining the underlying land to continue to grow and harvest timber. Overall, following light activity in Q1, coupled with COVID-related headwinds earlier on the year, demand has come back strong in our real estate development project areas as well as for rural land. Market strength is being driven by a combination of favorable demographics, historically low mortgage rates and an increased need for space, as many families reassess their living situations, after months of sheltering in place and working from home. We continued to be encouraged by the pipeline of opportunities in Wildlight, Florida, Richmond Hill, Georgia, and the Puget Sound area of Washington. In Wildlight, which is now in its fourth year development, the village center is gaining critical mass with several new buildings opening since July. In Richmond Hill, we expect the new interchange on Interstate 95, which is on track for completion before the end of this year to generate incremental demand for the residential mixed use and industrial portions of the project. Now moving on to our outlook. As noted in our earnings release, we expect to achieve full year adjusted EBITDA modestly above the high end of our prior guidance range of $240 million to $260 million. Additionally, we anticipate the pro forma EPS will be around the high end of our prior guidance range of $0.17 to $0.21. With respect to our individual segments, we now expect that our Southern Timber segment will achieve full year harvest volumes of roughly 6.2 million tons and full year adjusted EBITDA toward the higher end of our prior guidance range of $104 million to $109 million. We expect this strong demand for both pulpwood and sawtimber will continue through the balance of the year. Although, we expect the lower price salvage timber in markets affected by Hurricane Laura will impact our average pulpwood prices over the next few quarters. In our Pacific Northwest Timber segment, we now expect full year adjusted EBITDA well above our prior guidance range of $30 million to $32 million. We believe the strengthening of the Pacific Northwest market coupled with the partial year contribution from Pope Resources will likely result in full year adjusted EBITDA from the segment more than doubling the $17 million reported in 2019. While the wildfires have disrupted harvest activity in Oregon, we expect only a modest impact to our portfolio given the geographic dispersion of our Pacific Northwest footprint. We still expect to harvest between 1.6 million and 1.7 million tons in the region during 2020. We further expect continued strong sawtimber pricing, but believe pulpwood pricing will remain well below year ago levels. In our New Zealand Timber segment, we now anticipate full year harvest volumes of roughly 2.5 million tons and full year adjusted EBITDA near the high end of our prior guidance range of $50 million to $56 million. Our operations continued to normalize following the COVID-19 disruptions earlier this year with modest improvements anticipated in both export and domestic pricing. While we are very encouraged by the recovery and activity to date, we continue to expect the competition from European salvage volume may constrain pricing to some extent. In our Real Estate segment, we expect to achieve full year adjusted EBITDA near the high end of our prior guidance range of $77 million to $83 million due to continued strong demand and a favorable transaction pipeline across our sales categories. Lastly, we expect that our new timber fund segment will contribute full year adjusted EBITDA, the lower previous guidance range due to the operational impacts of the fires that we discussed earlier. I’ll now turn the call back to Dave for closing comments.

Thanks, Mark. Overall, we remain very encouraged by the stability of our business and the strength of our end markets, especially and what has clearly been a tumultuous year for many industries. Although still very elevated, we note that lumber prices have trended lower in recent weeks as such. We believe it’s prudent to prepare for some continued volatility in end markets, as there remains considerable uncertainties stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, the upcoming election, and a broader economic outlook as we look toward 2021. We’ve talked a lot in the past about our operational flexibility, our nimble approach to capital allocation and our focus on building long-term value per share. While the challenges posed in 2020 have tested our resolve, I’m very pleased with the progress made this year, as we continue to focus on long-term value creation for shareholders. On that note, I want to reiterate how proud I am of our employees. Our team has navigated the COVID-19 pandemic with poise and determination. The integration of Pope Resources has gone exceptionally well, especially considering the safety protocols and social distancing requirements necessitated by the pandemic. We continue to make significant progress towards several other strategic initiatives, and we’ve stayed nimble and capitalized on market opportunities as they have emerged. Additionally, when faced with natural disasters in both the U.S. South and the Pacific Northwest during the third quarter, our team mobilized quickly and safely to assess the damage to our lands and execute a plan to maximize salvage opportunities. I feel very fortunate to be surrounded by such exceptional talent at all levels of our organization, and continue to believe this helps position us for future success. This concludes our prepared remarks. I’ll now turn the call back over to the operator for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin our question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Anthony Pettinari with Citi. Your line is open.

Good morning. This is actually Randy Toth sitting in for Anthony. Can you talk about the price improvement in the U.S. South, typically got sawtimber? I think you commented, the improvement was driven by next as low as export demand. So maybe talk about the strength you’re seeing in various regions? And then just remind us how large that export business is expected to be this year and how that compares to prior years? Thank you.

Sure. This is Doug. I believe what your question was, a little broke up there, but from what I understand, you wanted to talk about the increase we’ve seen particularly in the South and pricing on saw timber and then our comments around exports. So I’ll cover those real quickly here. The main benefit to increase lumber prices across the South has been increased demand for sawlogs and loosening of log specs, which allowed us to harvest track heavier to saw grade in the quarter. Approximately, a quarter of the 8% year-over-year increase is due to actual increase in pricing and are mainly due to a shift in saw timber harvest to Atlantic Coast, we have greater competition with exports and therefore higher relative pricing. Has been the case for the past few years, due to our expiring Arkansas timber deeds, our harvest will shift back in Q4 towards the Gulf region, which realizes lower average supply in saw timber prices. So we did have a delay, typically, we see that volume happening in Q3 going into Q4, and this year it’s going to more heavily weight at Q4. With respect to the exports that you mentioned, we’ve seen them rebound. We talked about Sun Yield pine going into China once the tariffs waivers were put in place. And Sun Yield pine fills a niche market for previous – for pressure treating and that demand has been growing. Across the U.S. South in Q1, we saw about 155,000 tons, by Q3, it was up to 484,000 tons, and Rayonier participated and added a similar increase. And so we expect to see about a 55% increase of our 2019 volumes. So we’re seeing a pretty good demand there for that, and it’s creating that tension on the Atlantic Coast for us.

Got it. Okay. That’s very helpful. And then just maybe switching over, can you comment Chinese log inventories and what the off-take of those volumes have been in October thus far and how you’re thinking about that? Thank you.

Sure. China, Tony, has had an impressive V-shape recovery from COVID and that was led by construction to start with, but now shifting more heavily to industrial activity and exports to cover the downfall from competing nations, who are still struggling with COVID. So we’ve also seen what that consumer spending in China has been positive since Q2 similar to U.S. with home purchases and other durable goods. So over the course of the quarter, we’ve seen an increase in demand from 60,000 cubic meters per day, up to 110,000 cubic meters per day for Radiata pine. Now, particularly going in that furniture and pulp manufacturing commented earlier, so when we had historically high log inventories of around 7 million cubic meters going into the third quarter, this robust demand has brought that supply demand ratio down into the kind of 1.52-month balance that we consider as being healthy. And we’ve seen it basically come down to around 4 million cubic meters at this point in time. So with respect to that, the strong demand we’re seeing, we feel like we’re in a good position right now, where Radiata pine sits. Well, we have still seen is the increased supply of the German, particularly German, the European spruce. And so that’s impacting the exports of Pacific Northwest, particularly for hemlock. And so I expect that we’ll do considerably less if almost no exports to Pacific Northwest because there’s strong demand we have right now.

Okay. That’s very helpful. Thank you. I’ll turn it over.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Kurt Yinger with D.A. Davidson. Your line is open.

Great, thank you, and good morning, everyone. I just wanted to start in the Pacific Northwest and the sequential improvement and realizations. Could you maybe help us parse out how much of that was really attributable to Pope’s mix versus kind of apples to apples price gains?

Sure. Including the Northwest, the strong lumber markets resulted in the average 19% increase across both our chip-n-saw and saw timber grades. So we saw that that lift across all the grades. Based on the series we harvested in the quarter, we had about 7% higher proportion of chip-n-saw in our grade mix, which often trades at a 20% discount of saw timber, but this was made up for – by the higher proportion of Douglas-fir, our mix with addition to Pope volume. So that’s kind of what we saw was that additional Pope volume helped offset the increase amount of chip-n-saw we were harvesting.

Got it. Okay. That’s helpful. And with lumber rolling over and I realize it’s not directly tied to it, but could you maybe just talk about how your prices in the Pacific Northwest trended over the quarter and kind of exiting where they might be versus the Q3 average?

Yes. We’re not going to publicly talk about kind of the forward look on the pricing and things like that. But what I would say is lumber pricing still looks to be at a historical – historically strong going into the end of the quarter. And we believe going into the spring also from what we’re hearing from our customers and expectations for strong housing and repair remodeling activity in 2021. So while the sawlog pricing, it’s well above their cash cost of production, and so what we’ve seen is competition for supply of green logs appears to be a bigger driver than the absolute lumber pricing that sits right now.

Got it. Okay. And then as we start to look ahead to 2021, could you just talk directionally about some of the different drivers of harvest variations versus 2020 or even 2019 if that’s more representative just given all that’s happened this year?

And again, we’re not providing any guidance on a look forward basis at this point, but suffice it to say that we published our sustainable yield by segment. And I think our general operating philosophy is that we’re going to be generally in that range. We may shift volume, flex volume from time to time based on market conditions. But our going in expectation in any given year is that we’re going to be at around our sustainable yield.

Okay. And then just lastly, maybe you could just talk a bit about capital allocation priorities and what you’re seeing as far as potential Timberland acquisitions and just valuations across those opportunities?

Yes. I think if you look over the year, I think the biggest impediment to the Timberland transaction activity was just the inability to – from travel restrictions to get people on the ground to do additional due diligence, as we’ve seen that ease, we’ve seen more properties coming on the market and we’ve seen a pickup in activity. So I think from an offering standpoint, we’re back, I’d say to a more normalized level. In terms of pricing, keep in mind that this is influenced by capital flows. And I think we still see the timber asset class as a safe haven for capital. And so we’ve seen – we’ve continued to see a fairly robust amount of capital available in the space to invest in. And we’ve certainly seen that reflected in asset values to date.

Got it. Okay. That’s very helpful. Appreciate all the color and good luck in the fourth quarter.

Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Paul Quinn with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Yes. Thanks very much. Good morning. Just a follow up question on timber pricing. It looks like you got a very significant bump in the Pacific Northwest, while the U.S. South prices increased, there really wasn’t anything close to what we’ve seen in the lumber side. And with the expectation that lumber stays pretty robust going forward, do you anticipate a pickup in that? Is there a lag there or is this it?

I mean, Paul, a lot of that really is a function of what part of the U.S. South you’re in. And as we’ve discussed before, we had a stronger pricing performance on our logs relative to the broader market, just because we tend to be in more balanced or tensioned wood baskets in the South. So, the South still – in a overall sense had a build-in inventory – has had a build-in inventory since the global financial crisis of a decade ago. But that builds been very differential, where you have areas that are more imbalanced from a growth drain standpoint, we’ve seen a more price elasticity, and you see that in our results for Q3.

Okay. And then how do you guys look at in the changing environment your percentage of delivered sales versus coming sales? What’s happening back? And what do you expect going forward?

Yes. The change has particularly happened in the South. A lot of that is related to our export program and we’re delivering directly to our own yards and then exporting. And so through that process, we’ve shifted heavier to an export program on the Atlantic Coast. We’ve also seen – with respect to the weather and things like that. That we’ve had that we’ve been able to gain additional crews and then utilize them and keep them working for us basically as we go forward. So it’s been two combinations, but primarily it was the greater leverage to the export market has increased our need for delivered crews. And then through that process getting some also greater quotas into some of the local mills we’ve garner from that. So we’ve continued on with those crews.

Great. That’s all I have. Thanks a lot guys.

Thanks.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from John Babcock with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Good morning. This question, I mean, primarily, obviously you closed Pope Resources earlier this year. Just want to get a sense for now that you’ve got another core under your belt with that, where you see opportunity to enhance your own timberlands and recognizing obviously that the goal is ultimately to reduce leverage to some extent here. So just want to get a sense for where you see opportunities there?

I mean, I’d say that our approach is still very consistent with where it has been for the last number of years. We tend to have a preference around bolt-on transactions in all three of our geographies where we see a complimentary fit from an age class standpoint. In all three of our geographies, we have a rank ordered various sub regional markets. And we will put more emphasis on those. And so we’ve had a quality bias in the things that we’ve looked at and gone after. I think the Pope acquisition is certainly consistent with that. And right now, we’re looking at transaction opportunities really across all three of our timber segments, but again, with an eye toward quality and market dynamics.

And then with regards to the ATM equity offering is the goal for that. Well actually, can you just talk about, ultimately where those funds will be deployed? Should you decide to pursue that? And you mentioned maintaining flexibility on that front, so if you can just kind of talk about that and if there are kind of any thoughts around when and if that might be used?

Yes, sure. This is Mark. I’d say our mantra around capital allocation has been to be nimble and opportunistic. And really we view the ATM program as just another tool in the toolkit to optimize our capital allocation opportunities and to raise capital, when desired in a very cost effective manner. We also believe that it provides nice symmetry with our buyback program under which we still have roughly I think $88 million available pursuant to the last authorization. As we discussed earlier on the call, we didn’t issue any shares under the ATM during the third quarter. So we intend to remain very discipline around capital allocation and particularly, the issuance of equity. I mean, ultimately our appetite to use the ATM is going to be heavily influenced by the stock price as well as the opportunity set that we have available to deploy that capital at any given point in time.

Okay. And how do you balance the share issuance or with the share buybacks, was that effectively just going to be based on where the stock is trading? Or are there any other factors are taken into account there?

Yes, I mean, that’s going to – obviously, be a significant driver, really the design of our capital allocation program more broadly as to build NAV per share over time. And so we look to deploy buybacks when we see an opportunity to generate that NAV accretion per share through buybacks. And likewise, when we’ll use the ATM as appropriate to fund growth opportunities, when we think that there’s an opportunity that warrants the issuance of shares, again, we saw it as being sort of very symmetrical in terms of having that ability to buy back shares, when the pricing is opportune and likewise have the opportunity to issue shares, when we liked the price and we liked the opportunities that we have available to deploy that capital.

Okay. Does the equity offering there have any sort of limitations that we should be mindful?

Subject to typical trading restrictions around material non-public information, it’s a continuous offering program. And so I’d say, it operates much like the converse of a buyback where you’re able to issue shares periodically into the market, through open market transactions.

Okay. And then just last question before I turn it over. Just on Europe, if you can talk about the trend that you’re seeing there and ultimately how that’s, can you talk a little bit about how it’s impacting the China market by I just want to get a sense for volumes and how that compares this quarter versus last quarter?

Yes. We continued to see in the second quarter, the pulp volume for Europe was reduced due to COVID, but going into Q3. They’ve really stepped up. I don’t have the exact numbers with me right now, but I can tell you that Germany has hit an all time high on their exports. So we’re seeing increased supply going into China, particularly out of Germany over that time. But it was coming off of a lower quarter. So Jeremy has become the second largest importer of logs into China at this point in time behind New Zealand. We’ve also seen the meantime, a reduction in supply from Russia and a couple of other places. So there’s been a bit of balancing there.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And at this time, we have no further questions on the audio line.

Thank you. This is Collin Mings, I’d like to thank everybody for joining us. Please contact us with any follow-up questions.

That concludes today’s conference. Thank you for participating. You may disconnect at this time.