Welcome and thank you for joining Rayonier's Fourth Quarter 2016 Teleconference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Now, I will turn the meeting over to Mr. Mark McHugh, Senior Vice President and CFO. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to Rayonier's investor teleconference covering fourth quarter earnings. Our earnings statements and financial supplement were released yesterday afternoon and are available on our website at, rayonier.com. I would like to remind you that in these presentations we include forward-looking statements made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of Federal Securities Laws. Our earnings release and Form 10-K filed with the SEC lists some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we may make. They are also referenced on page two of our financial supplement. Throughout these presentations we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are defined and reconciled to the nearest GAAP measure in our earnings release and supplemental materials. With that, let's start our teleconference with opening comments from Dave Nunes, President and CEO. Dave?

First I’ll make a few overall comments before turning it back over to Mark to review our financial results. Then we’ll Doug Long, Senior Vice President of U.S. Operations to comment on our U.S. timber results. I’ll discuss our New Zealand Timber results and following the review of our Timber segments, Chris Corr, Senior Vice President, Real Estate will discuss our Real Estate results. Overall, we're pleased with our fourth quarter and full year results. The strength and diversity of our portfolio allowed us to significantly exceed our forecasted adjusted EBITDA guidance and our nimble approach to both operational and capital allocation decisions facilitated progress against several strategic initiatives during the course of the year. In the fourth quarter, we achieved adjusted EBITDA of $52 million versus $48 million in the prior year quarter. Softness in our Southern Timber segment and reduced land sales were more than offset by improved performance in the Pacific Northwest and New Zealand Timber segments. Our Southern Timber segment results reflect lower pulpwood prices, primarily due to geographic mix and lower volumes due to our decisions to defer planned harvest levels by 500,000 tons in response to unfavorable market conditions in certain areas. Our Real Estate results excluding the gain on the previously announced large disposition were below the prior year quarter due to the sale of fewer Non-strategic/Timberland acres. Although partially offset by a sale in Washington at a high per acre value and the receipt of a deferred payment on a prior land sale. Our Pacific Northwest Timber segments benefited from favorable pricing and increased harvest volumes from our recent Menasha acquisition. While our New Zealand Timber segment continued to perform well based on the strength of both domestic and export markets. With that, let me turn it back over to Mark for a brief review of our financial results.

Thanks, Dave. Let's start on page five with our financial highlights. Sales for the quarter totaled $221 million, while operating income with $62 million and net income attributable to Rayonier was $48 million or $0.39 per share. On a performance basis, net income was $6 million or $0.05 per share. Our pro forma net income for the quarter, excludes the $43 million gain from a large disposition. Fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA of $52 million was above the prior year quarter, primarily due to significant outperformance in our New Zealand Timber segment and improved results in our Pacific Northwest Timber segment, which were partially offset by reduced harvest levels in our Southern Timber segment and fewer acres sold and in Real Estate segment. As a reminder, adjusted EBITDA in our Real Estate segment excludes the impact of the previously announced large disposition that we closed during the quarter. On the bottom of page five, we provided overview of our capital resources and liquidity at year-end, as well as, a comparison to prior periods. Our cash available for distribution or CAD for the year was $144 million compared to $117 million in the prior year. A reconciliation of CAD to cash provided by operating activities and other GAAP metrics is provided on page nine of the financial supplement. We closed the quarter with $86 million of cash and roughly $1.1 billion of debt. Our net debt of $976 million represented 23% of our enterprise value, based on our closing stock price that quarter-end. Note that these figures exclude $71 million of cash proceeds from large dispositions that are currently held by LKE Intermediaries and therefore classified as restricted cash. I'll now turn the call over to Doug to provide a more detailed review of our U. S. Timber results.

Thanks, Mark. Good morning. Let's start on page 10 with our Southern Timber segment. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of $21 million was $2.6 million favorable to third quarter and $4 million unfavorable compared to the same period in the prior year. Fourth quarter harvest volume was 195,000 tons favorable compared to the third quarter, but 126,000 tons lower compared to the same period in the prior year, due to deferred harvest in response to softer market conditions. Fourth quarter pine pulpwood prices of $15.83 per ton or 9% below third quarter prices and 13% below the same period in the prior year. The drop in price was largely due to geographic mix. Although excess supply from extremely dry weather and hurricane salvage along the east coast also contributed to price declines in certain areas. Pine pulp timber prices of $26.75 per ton were 2% above third quarter prices, but flat compared to the same period in the prior year. As changes in geographic mix balanced out modest price fluctuations in different areas. During 2016, we deferred 500,000 tons of harvest volume in response to weaker market conditions. We will continue to monitor local market conditions, including the impact from the recent exclusion at the IP containment mill, to assure that we are driving the best long-term value across our entire portfolio. Now moving to Pacific Northwest Timber segment on page 11. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter of $7 million was $4 million favorable to both the third quarter and the same period in the prior year due primarily to higher harvest volumes. Fourth quarter harvest volume of 356,000 tons was 48% higher as compared to third quarter and 13% higher from the same period in the prior year. The Menasha acquisition, which we closed in May of 2016 was a primary driver in our ability to increase harvest volumes. Delivered pulpwood prices of $39.60 per ton relatively flat compared to third quarter prices and 12% unfavorable to the same period in the prior year. The decline in prices relative to the prior year quarter was due to the increased the availability of residual chips on the open market. Delivered sawtimber prices of $74.97 per ton or 2% unfavorable to third quarter 13% favorable to the same period in the prior year. The trend of increasing grade prices relatively to the prior year is due to improving export and domestic markets, combined with the increased contribution from our newly acquired Menasha properties which generally came in at sawtimber price due to heavy mix of Douglas Fir. Now Dave will review New Zealand Timber segments.

Thanks, Doug. Page 12 shows results in key operating metrics of our New Zealand Timber segment. We continue to be pleased with the operating performance of our New Zealand Timber segment, which delivered another strong quarter. Adjusted EBITDA on the fourth quarter of $18 million was $5 million favorable compared to the third quarter and $11 million favorable compared with the prior year quarter, primarily due to increased domestic and export product prices. Harvest volumes in the fourth quarter were generally comparable to both the prior quarter and the prior year quarter. Exports sawtimber prices increased 7% compared to the third quarter and 19% compared to the prior year quarter, primarily due to strong demand from China. While domestic sawtimber prices as measured in New Zealand dollars increased 3% compared to the third quarter an 18% compared to the prior year quarter as a result of strong local demand for construction materials. When factoring in the rise in the New Zealand dollar to U.S. dollar exchange rate, domestic sawtimber prices in U. S. dollar terms increased 30% compared to the prior year quarter. In our trading segment, fourth quarter volumes increased 30%, and average prices increased 14% compared to the prior year quarter, also due to strong demand from China. I’ll now turn it over to Chris to cover Real Estate.

Thank you, Dave and good morning everyone. As highlighted on page 13, our Real Estate segment delivered strong financial results in 2016, while maintaining discipline in our land sales program and focusing on properties with meaningful premiums to timberland values. Excluding large dispositions Real Estate sales for the year totaled $92 million on 36,000 acre sold at a weighted average price of $2,580 per acre. This compares to 2015 sales of $87 million on 33,000 acres equating to a weighted average price of just over $2,600 per acre. Fourth quarter highlights include the sale of 84 acres of unimproved development property in Florida for just over $39,000 per acre. This was a unique property in a strong market area with high visibility and road frontage. As part of our unimproved development strategy we worked with the developer over a period of more than two years to secure the development rights in order to unlock the value in this property. In the rural category, we closed a number of smaller sales, which collectively totaled approximately 500 acres at an average price of $2,750 per acre. In the non-strategic and timberland category, sales totaled 900 acres, including one significant transaction of 816 acres in Washington, for roughly $6,500 per acre. During the quarter, we also received the deferred payment of $4.7 million from our prior land sale that was contingent on a regulatory permit. I’ll now turn the call back over to Mark.

Thanks Chris. Page 15 shows our financial guidance by segment for 2017. As we look to 2017, we continue to see overall positive momentum in our Timber segments, as well as, attractive opportunities to augment value in our Real State segment. While the U.S. south continues to face some obstacles in near term price growth, longer term trends remain positive and we're optimistic that a resolution of the softwood lumber dispute will ultimately drive increased lumber production and saw timber demand in the U.S. south. Further, we continue to enjoy more favorable supply/demand conditions in some of our key markets relative broader U.S. south market averages. In 2017, we expect harvest volumes in our Southern Timber segment will be between 5.3 million and 5.5 million tons and adjusted EBITDA will be $93 million and $98 million. In our Pacific Northwest Timber segment, we expected increase in harvest volumes to a range of 1.3 million to 1.4 million tons for 2017 as we realize the full year impact of the portfolio repositioning moves we made in the second quarter of 2016. Coupled with steadily improving prices in the region, we anticipate 2017 adjusted EBITDA in the Pacific Northwest of $28 million to $31 million. In our New Zealand Timber segments, we anticipate harvest volumes of 2.4 million to 2.5 million tons and continued strong pricing dynamics, which we expect will yield 2017 adjusted EBITDA of $64 million to $68 million. On a combined basis our three Timber segments are expected to yield 2017 adjusted EBITDA on $185 million to $197 million, which represent an expected increase of 7% to 14% relative to 2016 actual adjusted EBITDA from our Timber segments of $172 million. Our Real Estate strategy remains focused on unlocking the long-term value of our HBU rural development property portfolio. Following an extraordinarily strong 2016, we expect to sell fewer acres in 2017. Overall, we expect Real Estate will contribute adjusted EBITDA in 2017 of $52 million to $60 million, although we continue to expect the quarter-to-quarter results will be lumpy. Other key elements of our 2017 guidance including depletion expense, interest expense, non-cash basis, CapEx, GAAP taxes and minority interest are summarized on page 15 of the financial supplement and on page F of the earnings release. Note that the increase in expected depletion expense is largely attributable to the increased depletion rates in our Pacific Northwest Timber segment following the Menasha acquisition. The expected increase in GAAP taxes and minority interest expense are both related to the anticipated increase in income from our New Zealand joint venture. Despite increased GAAP taxes, we generally expect that our cash taxes will remain relatively small. In total, we anticipate 2017 consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $220 million to $240 million and pro forma net income of $39 million to $45 million. I’ll now turn the call back to Dave for closing comments.

Thanks Mark. 2016 was a very busy and productive year for Rayonier and I wanted to take a moment to recap some of the key milestones we achieved in executing on a number of our strategic priorities. In March, we completed their recapitalization of our New Zealand joint venture. Through this recapitalization, we were able to increase our stake in the JV from 65% to 77% and refinance $235 million of New Zealand dollar denominated debt from a rate of 6.5% to a rate of 3.3%. We also completed this recapitalization at a time when the New Zealand dollar U. S. dollar exchange rate was at a 5 year low and thus further reducing the effective cost of this refinancing to an equivalent of US$155 million. The New Zealand operations have enjoyed outstanding performance over the past year and we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on strong market conditions in the future. In May, we completed a series of unique transactions that serve to meaningfully reposition our Pacific Northwest portfolio. We acquired 61,000 acres of highly productive, well stocked timberland with an average age of approximately 22 years. We simultaneously sold 55,000 acres of primarily pre-merchantable timberland with an average age of approximately 13 years. Through these transactions we were able to rebalance the age class profile of our Pacific Northwest portfolio, gain access to high quality domestic markets in western Oregon, increase our mix of Douglas Fir and significantly increase our near term harvest potential in the region. We classify the 55,000 acre sale as a large disposition for which we're excluding the adjusted EBITDA impact from our results. Such large dispositions are intended for capital allocation purposes, which was certainly the case in this instance where the sale funded roughly half of the acquisition cost. We…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Collins Mings from Raymond James. Sir, your line is now open.

Just to start, can you guys put a little more color around the trends you’re seeing in the south. Recognizing again you guys spent a lot of time analyzing various Pacific markets. Are there certain wood baskets maybe doing relatively better than others or are all the headwinds that you guys highlighted are more broad-based?

Hello, Collins, this is Doug. I’d say the weather dynamics of the continued extreme draught that we’ve seen for these logging conditions, through much of southeast and then the impact of the hurricanes Hermine and Matthew, a lot more supply than we normally see during this quarter and that's resulting in some more pulpwood pricing. We’ve really seen that across the south. There are some markets a little better than others, we won't get into that as it gets a little more operational for our teams. But really the geographic mix of our harvest accounted for over 50% of our price variance in the pulpwood in particular. Then 15% of our total pulpwood volume that we harvested in the fourth quarter was hurricane salvage at a much reduced price. So while the pricing was down considerably, there were some offsetting factors there and the remainder was really due to south wide comprising issues that we've seen just through that oversupply of the La Nina. We did expect that ended our hurricane salvage and everyone else has also by this time. So as we resume harvesting in some of the areas we deferred from Q4, we think that the pricing should improve as we go into the next quarter.

Okay. And then maybe along those lines relates more to sawlogs. Just given the recent rise in lumber prices, have you started any response from your customers yet, Doug.

Yes, we have, particularly in the fourth quarter and really what we’ve seen a response in sawlogs has been with the export market has started great pressure. So we’ve seen several new customers open up shop along the east coast. And suddenly up on exports, once China were up over 75% year-over-year according to last summer south report and I think we will suggest that. Then we’ve most recently seen export markets open up 80 miles inland from the coast. So where we've seen that increased pressure from exports markets we’re seeing that also relating to some pricing on the domestic side.

Okay. Then maybe Doug, remind us I know it can be difficult to peg exactly, but what percentage in the U.S. south of your operations would you say actually goes into the export market?

It’s a small percentage right now. I don't have that number handy, we can get back to you with that.

Okay. And then switching gears just over to Real Estate, I mean, I recognized it was only 816 acres, but can you touch on what drove the pricing of the timberland you sold in Washington, that’s looked like a pretty healthy price.

Yeah, hey, Collin, this is Chris. Good morning. It’s a high quality timberland property in the state of Washington. Good operability and access and it’s just – it was a quality piece of property. It happen to be sort of problem not contiguous to some of our other holdings and we had a lot of interested that over the last year so and just that made a deal that really worked.

Collins, just to be clear, it includes and affect value for the underlying HBU characteristics of the land, so you've got valuable timber, but also valuable underlying zoning and that's why you put those two together you get that strength and that price.

Okay, that's helpful. And then, Mark, just a quick question for you. What is driving really the year-over-year increase in CapEx?

Yeah, I think the CapEx that we articulated, last year the initial guidance, we came in below that and so we generally think our run rate is in that range of $60 million to $65 million. I think we did have some deferred CapEx in the fourth quarter that’s going to spill over into next year. But I wouldn’t say if there's anything that’s really driving changes to it, it's just really more timing.

Yeah, one thing I’d say just add that on the Silviculture side is we did have some timing around planting, so as Mark, said we’ll have some of that move into the next year. And also with that differed harvest, we just had some slow down and potential when we’d be doing for some site prep.

And a lot of it gets back to those same weather patterns that have impacted inventories have pushed out timing on those things.

Got it. Very helpful. Just one last one for me and Dave just recognizing to your last comment in prepared remarks as far as just the transformation and the capital recycling particularly over the last year. How do you see a pipeline here starting 2017 as far as opportunities to recycle capital versus where it stood a year ago?

Well, I think we're continuing to see an active land market Collins and at the same time, though however, I'd say that we’re being increasingly targeted at how we think about that. As we've talked about before in a lot of our investor visits. There is a very diverse build up of inventory across the U.S. south and we pay particular attention to those relative build ups in inventory and we try to target acquisitions in areas that we think have had less of a build in inventory. So there’s a lot of activity, but I'd say that we’re being pretty targeted in terms of how we approach it.

Great. Thanks for the color guys. Congrats on the success in 2016.

The next question comes from Ketan Mamtora from BMO. Sir, your line is now open.

Hi, Dave and Mark. Just first question coming to the last point that you mentioned on inventories are being built up and I realize that it is different in different states. But on a high level kind of what do you think is the extent of accumulated inventories on the stump at this point in U.S. south.

Yeah, Keith, we tend to look at it more in a local market sense, I mean, we’re not in every single region, but we spent a lot of time looking at growth drain yields and the buildup of those inventories relative to existing manufacturing capacity. So one of the statistics that we have included in our work looks at the change between 2005, the peak of the last housing start and the end of 2014 and looks at the build in inventory across different regions of the U.S. south as defined by timber market south. To give you a sense of the absolute range at the high end of the range, you've got one market in Northern Mississippi where you’ve had a 37% build in inventory and at the low end of the range, North Florida, you have had actually a decline in inventory of 4%. And so that just gives you a sense of the relative magnitude across the south of those with – we again tend to look more at the individual markets and are focused less on kind of the broader kind of macro set of conditions.

Okay. That’s helpful. And then switching to the Pacific Northwest. Can you talk about kind of what you saw in terms of the export markets there? Specifically in China what are you seeing there both out of New Zealand and Pacific Northwest?

Yeah, so there's a few things going on. There's lots of moving parts with respect to the export market and the first thing as we look back to 2016 recognize that one of the impacts in China as it relates to both U.S. and New Zealand demand is that China dramatically decreased the supply of domestic wood coming out of the northeastern part of the country, up against that the Russian border. So you had a little bit of a supply shock for the market that was one factor. Two, we had very little inventory build through the Chinese New Year last year and so that created a fair bit of momentum for the balance of the year. As the year progressed, we saw increased consumption across those markets. So you really had kind of triple effect of less supply domestically, a lack of build in inventory and improved consumption and all three of those things together powered a pretty strong export condition that affected both markets. Overlaying that you've got changes in lumber import patterns. The lumber imports from British Columbia which is a large supplier, were reduced this last year, while they pushed more wood into the United States and so that had an impact on the market. And going forward, we expect some of that to flip around where we would expect more lumber from British Columbia trying to flow into China over this next year as it relates to the softwood lumber agreement resolutions. Just recognize there's lots of moving parts in the context of that market.

No. That’s very helpful color. And just on that, how would you characterize the inventories in China at the start of 2017?

The inventories in China jumped a fair bit during this first part of that the Chinese New Year. Some of that was a function of Northern China where you had some pollution related stoppage of all industrial activity. And so the inventories in that part of the country jumped quite a bit. The inventories in the rest of the country to the south, I’d say are pretty stable and combined with high consumption rates, we remain pretty positive about those. So we'll be watching that you know as the next month or so progresses. This is the time of year where you really see the impact from that Chinese New Year inventory build.

Okay. That's very helpful. Then switching to the south. In your 2017, volume guidance what is the mix between sawlog and pulpwood, is it close to what you had in 2016 kind of 31%, 32% sawlogs.

Yeah, generally expect it would pick up a little bit from that, Ketan. We said that we expect a transmission more towards a sawlog mix over the next several years that’s based on spending decisions we made a decade ago. And so you know we do expected that mix will continue to transition more towards a grade mix over the next few years. So I would expect that it would pick up somewhat from that. But again we're going to continue to be judicious about where we're harvesting and what we're harvesting, to sort of best capture the market opportunities that we see.

Okay, that’s helpful. And then, you still expect kind of to be at 50/50 over the next let’s say, four, five, six years kind of a timeframe in terms of the mix?

Yeah, they continue to transition to that type of ratio.

Okay, that’s helpful. Then last question and then I’ll turn it over. Any update on the negotiations with respect to the lumber trade dispute?

We’re not really a direct part in that. I think others who are closer to it can probably speak more accurately to it. I think the expectations that we've had all along that that we really won’t see meaningful change until the middle of the year continue to be the case. The delay in getting the U.S. trade representative confirmed is probably factoring into some of that. But I think we continue to expect that we’ll see some form of duty imposed during the second quarter. And that's going to eventually bleed into sawlog values particularly in the U.S. south where we believe that that part of the country has the most room to respond.

Again, just one last very quick one. Were you guys the primary or the only source of supply to the IP mill remember that is down recently?

With respect to IP mill our team is monitoring the developments around there and work with customers, try to shift the volume and we’re able, they significant customers in that area. Saw the recent report yesterday about them bring back up in Q2. So with our deferrals of volume that we had in 2016 and other market areas that allow us to just harvest plant that’s necessary but we’re really in an early stage trying to understand when it will come back up.

Okay that's very helpful. I’ll turn it over. Good luck in 2017.

The next question comes from Mandeep [ph] from RBC Capital Markets. Sir, your line is now open.

Morning, its Mandeep coming in for Paul. I just had a few questions. So Timber Mart-South, so I know they are quarter-over-quarter decrease in domestic stumpage pricing. Any indication on when southern sawlog pricing will pick up? And if they will be sustainable?

I mean I think we’ve continued to really look at it more at a regional level and less at an individual market. You know you've got a very big spread across the south from a stumpage pricing standpoint between the lowest to the highest market of roughly 2x. So you really have to look at it market-by-market. We continue to believe that the factors associated with the gradual recovery in U.S. housing is going to play a role, Doug touched on the margin impacts of export markets in those regions that that supply export conditions. And then we continue to see strong demand from the pulp and paper side of our demand flows from pulpwood. So we continue to see this as a steady as she goes improvement over the long-term.

I’d just add to that, I mean we are still seeing the impacts of the softwood lumber dispute and more wood coming in from Canada. And so I think everybody has been pretty cautious around the near term prospects, for the increase in sawtimber prices. But still positive on the longer term outlook and I think we’ll have to wait and see what happens with the softwood lumber dispute and then how that translates into lumber prices and sawtimber demand and ultimately sawtimber prices.

Fair enough. That’s helpful. Turning over to Pacific Northwest volumes they’re down year-over-year in 2016 guidance is for higher volumes. Could you just help me understand market dynamics going into 2017?

Yeah, the volume change is really driven by the portfolio repositioning that we did there. Recall that we had anticipated stepping down volume in the Pacific Northwest over a period of a year to about 1 million tons. Following the portfolio repositioning that we announced in Q2 last year. We effectively said that we're going to be able to harvest much closer to our sustainable yield over the near term. So 1.3 million to 1.4 million tons is our general expectation of the harvest levels over the next three to five years.

Okay. That’s helpful. And just at $5 million savings of SG&A on an annualized basis. On last call it was mentioned that most of it would be realized in the near term. I’m just wondering if you could provide some color on how much of the savings have been realized already, if any?

Yeah, I mean the bulk of the savings were fairly immediate in nature. That said we didn't see a $5 million reduction in year-over-year corporate expense and there are really a few elements that, first, not all of those cost savings are going to show up in that corporate segment. Some of those cost savings were either segment level costs or G&A costs to get allocated back to the segments. So for example, most of IT cost savings would fall into that category. Second, our estimate of the pension expense savings at the time we announced the pension freeze last year was relative to our then current pension accounting assumptions, really putting in on an apples-to-apples basis. As we've updated our pension assumptions for 2017 that expenses come up due to changes in return and discount rate assumptions. That said it would have come up even more, but for the pension freeze, so I think it's still fair to say that we’ve realized those cost savings relative to what pension expense would have otherwise been in 2017. We're just not seeing the full amount show up in corporate on a year-over-year basis. Lastly, we had some one-time expenses assumed in 2017 related to our office move and some IT transition costs, which are offsetting some of those year one savings. So I guess its long way of saying the cost savings are there, they’re just not showing up as the $5 million year-over-year decline in our corporate segment operating income. You'll see more of it show up in our consolidated SG&A.

All right. That helps. And just lastly, the CapEx guidance, how much is maintenance?

The CapEx guidance that we provide is generally all maintenance, we don’t make any acquisitions into that.

All right. Thanks. That’s all for me. Good luck in 2017 guys.

The next question comes from Mark Weintraub from Buckingham Research. Sir, your line is now open.

Thank you. How may tons in the U.S. South would there go into and an NDX, 1 million board feet of lumber.

It has to get that conversion ratio. Its different by market, it's different in the south versus the northwest measurements, units are measuring wood are different in different region. So it's not a simple question.

Before magnitude 3 tons, is that kind of fair. 2.5 tons, 3 tons. Let me just ask the next question, which is do you believe that – so if we look about the Canadian softer lumber agreement, if a tariff is put in place that creates some sort of umbrella for pricing in the U.S. How much and how quickly can you potentially start sharing in that through your sawtimber operations. Do you have a view on that?

I think so much of it has to do with how quickly mills are prepared to ramp up production. I know in our discussions with a number of sawmill customers including those that have purchased mills in recent years, what they’ve been focused on really initially is kind of getting production stabilized at a one shift level before they are prepared to make it a call to add a shift. So I think a lot of those companies have been working in that capacity. I think the second thing to recognize is is that you've got labor issues in terms of being able to just very quickly add shifts. I think that in most of the markets that we're talking about the ability to get incremental wood supply into those mills as they add hours or add shifts, it’s probably less of an issue than it is to get labor to add a capacity. So I think that's going to be something that may act as a governor on the rate of change in overall southern lumber production.

You actually have mentioned that there had been a lot of wood coming in from Canada. In the very recent past last couple of weeks, obviously, we’ve had some improvement in cash market prices, the futures markets have gone up quite a bit for lumber. Are you seeing any shift in behavior from, in those local markets, is less Canadian wood as people are concerned about the retroactive duties of having an impact? Is less wood now coming in from Canada. And is that already leading to more enquiries in your regions or not yet?

Well, I mean, certainly we're seeing the same stuff that you are in terms of the anticipation of some potential retroactive duty application and the impact that that’s perceived to be having in terms of market flows. But recognize that there's a ripple effect going back to the stump and so it'll be a little longer before we see that than say you would if you had direct lumber manufacturing capacity that was competing against those flows of lumber on a day-to-day basis.

Okay. And then lastly sort of shifting gears. A fair bit of timberland that might be coming to the market in the next year, year and a half via the TIMOs. How important – is what's going on in interest rates to how these lands are likely to – or how you would view, how you would value these properties?

Well, it’s dynamic. I mean, I think that in some level as you see a rising interest rate environment that rising interest rate environment is predicated on an inflationary environment, which is in turn predicated on higher production – product pricing. So as we see more inflation impacting the price of the products, we expect that that's going to play into the rise in interest rates. We certainly look at it more from – we factor that in as we think about hurdle rates, but we're also looking at it from the perspective our alternative uses of capital and we’re always - when we look at acquisitions understanding how our own timber is trading at the time on an imputed discount rate and we compare that to what we think the market clearing discount rate is on any particular transaction. I don’t know Mark if you want to add anything to that.

No. I think that’s a good characterization of how we think about it.

Well, and maybe just add one more. Would look that like particularly in the U.S. South that buyers already incorporate substantial appreciation in expected sawtimber pricing et cetera. Now do these same models in your judgment certainly can use your own thought process, do they incorporate meaningful increases in interest rates as well? Or is it that you've actually, the models are getting benefit to price appreciation and not necessarily so much for the interest rates. Of course prices could go up more than what’s imputed, but any thoughts on that?

Yeah, I mean, it probably depends on who you're talking to, I mean everybody – it’s a little bit differently and recognize too that you know a big impact. This really kind of boils down to how you think about discount rates and hurdle rate and it's not only you know, reflective of your cost of capital and alternative uses of capital, but it's also reflective of the flows of capital. What we've seen is that there's been continued interest in the timber asset class from a capital flow standpoint and that has tended to have a dampening effect on cap rates in the sector as people have pushed money into this sector from a flight to quality and just a general conservative investment perspective. So you’ve got some offsetting things at play there.

Great. Appreciate. All the insights.

There are no questions in queue at this time. [Operator Instructions] Speakers, we show no further questions at this time.

Okay, great. This is Mark, I’d like to thank everybody for joining us today and please contact me with any follow-up questions. Thanks.

That concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participating. You may disconnect at this time.