My name is Bella and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Rapid7 Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Elizabeth Chwalk, Head of Investor Relations at Rapid7. You may begin.

Thank you, operator. And good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today to discuss Rapid7's fourth quarter and full-year 2024 financial and operating results in addition to our financial outlook for the first quarter and full fiscal year 2025. With me on the ball today are Corey Thomas, our CEO, and Tim Adams, our CFO. We have distributed our earnings press release over the wire, and it is now posted on our website at investors.rapid7.com, along with the updated company presentation and financial metrics file. This call is being broadcast live via webcast and following the call, an audio replay will be available at investors.rapid7.com. During this call, we may make statements related to our business that are considered forward-looking under federal securities laws. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include statements related to the company's positioning, strategy, business plans, foundation work in 2024, operational improvements, growth drivers, ability to reaccelerate growth and scale profitability, financial guidance for the first quarter and full year 2025 and the assumptions underlying such goals and guidance, and the impact of its product profile and 2025 investments. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs and on information currently available to us. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from the future results expressed or implied in these statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those contained in our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2024, and in the subsequent reports that we file with the SEC. The information provided on this conference call should be considered in light of such risks. Actual results and the timing of certain events may differ materially from the results or timing predicted or implied by such forward-looking statements and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. Rapid7 does not assume any obligation to update the information presented on this conference call, except to the extent required by applicable law. Our commentary today will primarily be in non-GAAP terms and reconciliations between our historical GAAP and non-GAAP results can be found in today's earnings press release and on our website at investors.rapid7.com. At times in our prepared comments or in responses to your questions, we may offer incremental metrics to provide greater insight into the dynamics of our business or our quarterly results. Please be advised that this additional detail may be one-time in nature, and we may or may not update these metrics in the future. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to our CEO, Corey Thomas. Corey?

Thank you, Elizabeth. And welcome to everyone joining us on the call today. Rapid7 ended 2024 with $840 million in ARR, in line with our outlook and growing 4% over the prior year. Revenue and operating income exceeded our guided ranges, while we generated over $150 million in free cash flow for the year. Customer engagement in the fourth quarter aligned with patterns we observed at the end of Q3. We're seeing encouraging trends in platform adoption evidenced by expanding deal sizes and longer contract durations. While these factors naturally extend our deal cycles, they underscore the growing strategic value customers see in consolidating their security operations with Rapid7. Our detection response business remained a key pillar of strength, delivering double digit growth in 2024, ending the year at over $400 million in ARR. The strategic value of our security operations platform is reflected in the average ARR per DNR customer, which is now approximately $100,000. Meanwhile, our risk and exposure management business is showing promising momentum, driven by early traction from Exposure Command. The integrated approach of our command platform resonated strongly with customers, helping drive over 20% year-over-year growth in total risk and exposure management pipeline generation during the fourth quarter. Looking back at 2024, it was a year of critical foundational work across three strategic priorities. First, we focused on innovation within our world class detection response offering by expanding our coverage of third party alerts and leveraging AI driven capabilities for alert triaging and detection accuracy. We significantly improved our customers' ability to respond with the speed and precision that they expect. These advancements strengthened our competitive position and delivered measurable benefits to our customers, solidifying our leadership in a rapidly evolving market. Second, we made substantial progress scaling our partner ecosystem to drive more efficient…

Thank you, Corey. Good afternoon, everyone. And thank you for joining us on the call today. Before I turn to the results, a quick reminder that, except for revenue, all financial results we will discuss today are non-GAAP financial measures unless otherwise stated. Additionally, reconciliations between our GAAP and non-GAAP results can be found in our earnings press release. Rapid7 ended the year with $840 million in ARR, growing 4% over the prior year. We ended 2024 with solid double-digit growth momentum in our detection and response business and with promising early traction and efforts to stabilize and accelerate growth in risk and exposure management. As Corey shared, fourth quarter deal activity tracked as expected, reflecting stable customer spending patterns. Our larger deal sizes and longer contract durations reflect strengthening customer partnerships and will support expansion opportunities over time. Our total customer base grew 2% year-over-year to end 2024 with over 11,700 customers globally. Just under 15% of these customers have adopted a consolidated offering, which reflects the sizable opportunity to drive expansion in our customer base. ARR per customer grew 2% year-over-year to approximately $72,000, reflecting continued customer expansion within our platform. Full year revenue of $844 million grew 9% over the prior year and exceeded the high end of our guidance range. Recurring product revenue also grew 9% over the prior year to a full year total of $809 million, while professional services declined 6% as we actively deemphasize certain lower value services. Operating income of $164 million was above our guided range for the year as well. This represents 19% full year operating margin, an expansion of over 600 basis points from the prior year, demonstrating our ability to drive operational efficiency alongside our 2024 investments in innovation and growth. We generated $154 million of free cash…

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Saket Kalia with Barclays.

Corey, maybe just to start with you, I understand the strategic shift towards detection and response, but I just wanted to double check some numbers that you called out in your prepared remarks. I think you said about $400 million in ARR for detection and response, most of which is managed DNR, and I think we said that's growing mid-teens. Is it fair to say that the remainder of ARR is mostly VM? And if so, how are we kind of thinking about growth in that segment in 2025?

You're right on the D&R business growth and MDR weighted towards the mid-teens. The remainder is a mix of cloud, VM and we have some legacy sort of like products and technologies around threat intelligence and all there. So it is a number of other things. The way that I would think about it is we have very good confidence and we're leaning into and investing more into the D&R growth. We think we have a big market open opportunity there. We do believe that the integrated exposure management market is going to be a growth driver and we've seen early momentum on that as we actually go forward. I would just say to your core question is, entering this year, we actually are taking the approach of actually adding it into our guidance and expectations as we actually see the progress in arrears. So we've seen good initial both pipeline build, we've seen good conversion rates. It is upside to our plan, It's a continuing momentum that we actually have, but it is primarily upside to the plan because we want to make sure that we're not over precise on the timing or the deal cycles or anything else.

Tim, maybe for my follow up for you, the investment that's going towards Managed D&R to support that growth, I think we got that message loud and clear. Maybe as you think forward though, can you just talk about how the margins in that business might look at scale versus maybe the rest of the business?

I think overall product gross margins will remain stable in that mid-70s range that you've seen historically. The managed service does come in at a lower gross margin due to the nature of the business. There's a labor component. We do a lot of work around introducing AI to drive more efficiencies. We talked about the innovation center and the SOC over in India. That also gives us the opportunity to drive some efficiencies. But if you look at overall gross margin from a mix standpoint, the managed service gives you a little bit of a headwind because of the lower gross margin. But we think we have a tailwind based on some of the AI and the efficiencies that we can drive over time. But overall, when you look at product gross margin, mid-70s should remain stable.

Your next question comes from the line of Matt Hedberg with RBC.

Corey, I wanted to circle back to something you said on the prepared marks. I think you said you reached some significant cloud security milestones, which is good to hear, and I think some of the numbers you gave supported that. I'm just curious, though, at a high level, can you help us think about like your value proposition, why you're winning there? Obviously, it's a competitive landscape when we're talking about cloud security. I guess how sustainable is that success do you think?

Look, it's a hyper competitive landscape. One of the things that we actually spend a lot of time looking at is how to make sure that we're actually taking an approach that was going to be both value-add in the market, but also going to be actually sustainable over time. One of our big realizations is that cloud security is still adopted by a relatively small number of customers. And if you look at the broader market and if you look at sort of like the cloud security market at scale, what people really want is complexity reduction. Our big focus is how do you actually deliver integrated exposure management. But when you really think about that is how do I actually understand my attack surface regardless of whether it's cloud, on-prem, endpoint, SaaS solutions and how do I have an integrated complete view of my attack surface, how do I track my risk over time, how do I adhere to an incredibly fragmented regulatory compliance state that's emerging up and then how do I manage my remediation. Our approach is not to go after, I would just say, the traditional what we think about as the first mover cloud centers of excellence, hyper competitive market. Our focus is how do we actually make total security risk management and exposure management accessible, cost effective, easy to use, easy to manage compliance, easy to manage remediation for your average sort of organization and customer around the world and that targets our core customer base of that. When we looked even in our install base, we saw under adoption of anyone's cloud security technology. So we approached it less from a how do we actually go build what other people are building in the traditional cloud security market. We approached it from how do we actually help customers solve their overall security problems, track and manage risk and compliance and do that within the security budgets that they actually have for those that are under adopted. And we see that as a pretty big market, pretty sustainable, and so that's the core focus that we have.

Sounds like a lot of greenfield opportunity there.

Lots of greenfield.

And maybe this is a kind of a dovetail for Tim. Corey, you talked about some of the incremental investments. I guess, Tim, from your perspective, I guess how confident are you when you think about the financial model of those leading system acceleration in 2026? Do you think we start to see some margin improvement then in calendar 2026?

Matt, look, we were very confident in the steps we're taking. $30 million investment, Corey talked a little bit about it. Roughly half of that is going toward MDR and expanding that service capability. So we think that will be a growth driver. The other half, I would say is really just accelerating the roadmap on Exposure Command, again, a product we're very excited about and opening up this new innovation center and SOC in India, which we know will drive, I think, some exciting innovation talent over time, but also does come at a cost benefit as well. So we do expect to see more of that yield in 2026 and beyond.

Your next question comes from the line of Fatima Boolani with Citi.

Corey, I wanted to go back to this earlier question and some of your commentary in the script around the vulnerability management as narrowly defined being in secular decline? I think that's pretty evident in the numbers. If your D&R business is growing double digits, I think we can all do the math. That's over half your ARR at this point. So what I want to ask you is, where are we in kind of the trough or the nadir of some of this decline and I guess the disillusionment in this market and how are you directionally thinking about the trajectory of decline in this area in 2025? And I have a follow up for Tim, please.

Yeah, it's a good question. There's two different parts. One's a secular decline because vulnerability management has traditionally been on-prem. There's been less participation in the – I would just say the cloud dollars and some of the other risk dollars. That said, we do see pretty robust opportunities when you think about how people have to manage risk in a pretty crowded – not crowded, but in a pretty fragmented regulatory environment. So the way that I see it right now is that if you look at traditional on-prem vulnerability management, I would just say there's not lots of growth there. I don't know if there's massive decline there. There's just not a lot of incremental growth there. The growth areas that we see specifically are the greenfield organizations that actually are trying to get a handle on how do they actually deal with incredible regulatory compliance pressures, deal with a very fragmented environment, and have very few resources to actually manage that. That's where we see some of the earlier momentum with Exposure Command. Now to get to your core point on timing. The expectation that we laid out for this year is that like we see it in pipeline building mode. We built pipeline. We see early conversion rates. We see it, I would say, incrementally positive this year from a total net perspective, but it's not sort of like adding to material growth in our baseline plan right now. That said, we'll increase that as we actually go across the year and see the numbers. But we put pretty modest expectations in based on the exit rates coming out of last year. Of course, we're managing that to actually be more forward. But we see lots of the benefit again coming in throughout this year and building into next year.

Just in terms of the margin guidance that you shared, there's been a tremendous amount of change in the business from a personnel standpoint. You all went through a pretty material rebalancing of the workforce. So I wanted to better understand, in 2025, just at a base layer, sales productivity, sales capacity, anything you can give us on how much of the capacity is still kind of net new and still ramping. And some of the productivity trends that you saw this year, how are you toggling that into your assumptions for the mid-single digit ARR growth for next year?

On a sales perspective, we're actually adding a modest amount of sales headcount and we expect to see productivity gains. That's primarily because our sellers have now more products to sell. Remember, last year, we had like a partial year of selling with the transition from CRC to Exposure Command. The lion's share of the productivity gains is just a full year of selling with better pipeline coming into the year on Exposure Command. So we feel really good about that. On your point about the staffing changes from the time that we actually did the restructuring through now, I remind you that – now you see some of the results. Our intention was always to actually rotate our business towards D&R and what we eventually called Exposure Command. I will say that we expect more of that expenses to hit last year. So we were a little bit slow off the mark on actually reaccelerating the hiring around that. That definitely has some implications on the growth and the velocity that we wanted to see. In some ways, this year was sort of like rebalancing for some of the hires that we originally expected to actually start last year. But we're still on the plan that we originally intended with rotating the business from traditional vulnerability management towards a detection and response oriented business with the core exposure command underlying base that really targeted that greenfield market.

Your next question comes from the line of Joseph Gallo with Jefferies.

Can you just further elaborate on the competitive and pricing environment? I just want to better understand what gives you confidence that this is a pipeline to eventual conversion timing story versus competitive pressures.

What I would just say is just to hit it directly is that I would say traditional VM was a competitive pressure source. And I think we were pretty clear about that in my prepared remarks. On the exposure command and the momentum that we're actually seeing there, I would just say the evidence is evidenced by the fact that we not just go pipe, we actually saw conversion rates ahead of where we expected. Look, it's still nine month deal cycles, but we actually are seeing the trending on the adoption and the conversion rates where we expect them to be. Now I expect that to still be a somewhat competitive market, which is why we're investing because we see the growth opportunity, we see the interest, we actually see the momentum. So we're not assuming that it's a non-competitive market, but we have a massive, I would just say, upsell opportunity within our own install base. If you look at it, we saw a significant amount of the pipeline that we built and the early conversions in our install base. We've not had a big expansion business off of our traditional VM install base for a while. We see a lot of latent demand within that resource constrained buyer, that Russell 3000, those private firms. And so, those are the dynamics that we look at. We don't expect any market in security to be non-competitive. But what I would just say is that the opportunity is very robust, both from a D&R perspective, especially with our MDR offering, as well from the exposure demand perspective.

As a follow up, if you look at your guidance and maybe compare it to previous years, what's your sense of visibility into your forecast? And as we look at potential upside drivers to the 4% to 6% ARR growth, what are the things that can go right this year and are those more first half or second half stories?

It's a very good question. The first thing is you notice that we widened guidance versus prior years. After the year last year, we had no intention of actually not being incredibly thoughtful as we actually came into it. We widened the guidance range that we actually sort of like took as we actually entered this year. The drivers of upside, to your core question, are fairly straightforward overall. We're expanding our MDR offering. It's an area of strength. The deal cycles are longer, so we are seeing sort of, I would just say, more larger deal cycles just to be clear. But we talked about what the ARR per customer for the overall MDR customer is. But we see upside to that as we expand that offering. The pipeline that we built on Exposure Command is actually very good. We saw good early progress. It is still primarily upside to the plan, just to be clear. Look, this is a year from a guidance perspective that we're not going to actually change or raise numbers till we actually see the performance in arrears. We think that's the right thing to do with our investors and with the context. So when we see performance, we'll actually do it in arrears. But we do see lots of opportunities for upside. But again we're measured. Now I would just say one of the things that we're watching closely and that I'm hearing a lot about from our customers is we have a lot of customers, especially when you think about these resource constrained buyers that are under some pressure from ambiguity. If you look at our healthcare customers that are relying on federal funds, if you look at our state and local customers that are also reliant and as well as our emerging federal market, those are customers that are trying to understand how the federal funds are going to flow. And so, we're incrementally thoughtful about like how that plays out over the course of the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Coleville with Scotiabank.

I guess looking at the numbers, what stands out to me is, I guess, improvements in the kind of net new ARR contraction and guided to continued improvements in kind of the trajectory for net new ARR into next year. I think you called out in the prepared remarks that expecting net new ARR by the back half of 2025 to actually be kind of flat to maybe up. Just so we're completely clear, what are the factors that give you confidence to call out the kind of net new ARR in the back half of the year could even grow from these levels?

Yeah, it's a great question. So the first is that it's based on areas of strength. We see good opportunity in the D&R business and we're extending that business. There's parts of it that we haven't been able to address historically that was more customized business, especially in the enterprise segment. So we're making a pretty significant investment to actually extend the business. And it's something that our sales team has actually been hungry for. The second thing that we're looking at as we actually go along is we actually have a better pipeline entering this year. Now we are being sort of thoughtful about sort of like how that actually sort of converts over the pace of the year. But we are in a much better position from overall pipeline. And we do have the upside from the Exposure Command, Surface Command and Vector Command products that we introduced late last year.

Patrick, it's Tim. So, you saw we had a strong Q4 of this year, and that is traditionally the strong quarter for us. And so, as we model out the profile of net new throughout the year, we do see Q3 and Q4 being a little bit stronger, again with Q4 playing out similar to what you saw this year.

My follow on is just about the competitive environment. Rapid7 today is a very different business to what it was even just 12 months ago. I guess if we think about the key competitors as of right now in these new areas, like D&R and Exposure Command, are we talking about your traditional competitors, your VM competitors, those guys and their tools there? Or is it network security competitors or kind of cloud native competitors?

It's a good question about competition. On the NVR market, it's a different set of competitors. Part of what we like, it's a massively fragmented market that actually includes service providers, tech oriented service providers, endpoint providers. But it's a fragmented market and we think that fragmented competitive markets are great places to actually play. And we think our strategy of actually providing the widest visibility and monitoring across the attack surface and assisting customers in how they manage and operate that environment is a good play and a strategic play there. When you look at sort of like the precursor to that that ties directly into our exposure management market, because part of what differentiates us from MDR is we understand the attack surface better than our traditional MDR players. We have good symmetry between those markets. When we identify exposures, we also have the opportunity to say here's how we can actually actively monitor those exposures for attacks. When you think about the exposure management market, I would just say you're seeing that market evolving and emerging because most people recognize, if you are going to actually be a narrow player, it's going to limit your opportunity. Like cloud, there's only so many people that are going to have massive cloud centers for excellence where they're going to be paying hundreds of thousand dollars to millions of dollars a year. Vulnerability management, if you're just doing that, you're on-prem. It really is how you provide integrated risk. We think that there's going to be some major cloud security players that are going to shift and expand their offering over time. You saw Tenable did the acquisition, which was a smart acquisition that actually put them in the exposure management market. So we do expect that to be a competitive market. We also see it's a massively underserved market. We see where it's the opportunity that's emerging and we're investing behind pursuing that opportunity and we think we're incredibly well positioned there over time.

Your next question comes from the line of Hamza Fodderwala with Morgan Stanley.

Corey, good to see the stabilization on the net new ARR front this quarter. I'm just curious. It seems like there's more growth or greater mix shift rather in the faster growing part of the business, the MDR portion of the business. But can you comment on the churn or the downsell pressure that you're seeing in the VM part of the exposure management business? Has that started to bottom out as well?

I'll remind you two things. One, last year, we actually were not selling our VM and CRC solution for a big part of the year when we were actually going through the transition. So that added growth pressure overall last year. I would also just say, in retrospect, we did not manage the transition from the traditional vulnerability management to our integrated security operations stack with MDR and Exposure Command as well as we actually could have. And so, what we saw was increasing pressure when customers were trying to figure out what our strategy was. And that caused both retention pressure, but most importantly new add pressure while we were waiting to actually add the new product. We see the new add stabilizing this year and we see the retention we factored in as stable from last year. We're looking at improvements as we upgrade our install base from vulnerability management from our InsightVM product to our Exposure Command product, which is a much stickier, much more integrated product. So I would just say our baseline assumptions assume stability and we feel really good about the stability right now. The upside is, if we're able to actually upgrade our install base faster, that prevents both expansion dollars, but those customers are also stickier because they're more integrated into the overall environment.

Your next question comes from the line of Adam Tindle with Raymond James.

Very clear that it makes sense to invest behind the strength in the D&R piece that's growing. I did want to tackle the other half of ARR that's in decline and just wondered the different options that you considered for that, what you could potentially do to reaccelerate that or is that kind of more good money after bad? And the strategic optionality you might have considered, understand that it's maybe a little bit more minimal growth, but presumably profitable. What would be the pros and cons to considering maybe even splitting or selling that piece?

We look at all options when it comes to actually thinking about what's the best way to actually get shareholder return. It was influenced by, I would just say, two ways. One, the strategy that we went down on the attack surface management path is a core differentiator for our D&R business. And so, that's the first thing to actually consider. The second thing is we saw a pretty significant opportunity that we're excited about. And the early momentum that we actually saw from Exposure Command and Surface Command validated the early momentum that we actually saw from customers who are looking at how to tackle an incredibly complex risk environment. So to get to the core of your question is that we really focused on where do customers have the most pain. Is it already addressed by other products at reasonable price points? And where can we actually have a differentiated position? There's a significant amount of customers out there who are struggling with the complexity of managing a complex environment. And we actually see that those customers are, not just under invested, but they're looking for solutions to solve that complexity problem. And that's why we built and designed Exposure Command for. It's for that growth oriented market and we actually see great growth opportunities there.

Maybe a quick follow up for Tim. I just wonder, if you look at the past couple years, you initially start out with an ARR guidance that seems to be thoughtful on the surface and then, throughout the year, we've had to kind of lower expectations consistently. For investors who have through that, what's different about this year, particularly given, if we take the Q1 commentary, it's going to be kind of flat sequentially, it's going to imply about 40% growth in net new in Q2, Q3 and Q4. So those investors who have been through that cadence in the past, what would be something to give them a little bit more comfort this year of what's different.

Corey touched on a couple things. I think one is the strength of the pipeline as we see that playing out over time, the success that we've had with D&R, MDR, mid-teens growth rate, $400 million of ARR. We're clearly one of the market leaders in that space and that gives us a lot of confidence based on the quality of the product that we have. We're investing behind it as well. So, take roughly half of that incremental investment for next year is really going to accelerate more that we can do with MDR. I think when you take all of these factors considered, and I think Corey touched on a little bit earlier, is we're not going to bake into the plan a large success of Exposure Command. We're seeing early signs that are very promising, the pipeline growth, the conversion rates and we just have a modest contribution in the plan this year and it really is a wait and see. Let's get the ARR that's booked and sold before we really bake it into the guidance or make any changes there. I think it's the strength of MDR that's going to drive a lot of this.

The last thing I'll say is we're hyperfocused on both looking ahead and looking at different seasonality ranges and sort of communicating that proactively. Two, we actually ended this year with a much wider guidance range and we communicated that proactively and we looked ourselves more leverage for upside in the business as things move around. So we feel pretty good about the setup and it is materially different than sort of like the setup of what we described last year.

Your next question comes from the line of Jonathan Ho with William Blair.

Just one question for me. Can you talk a little bit about your thoughts on net retention just given these larger deal opportunities and upsell opportunities and maybe can you contrast that with the opportunity for an uptick in contribution from net new customers?

Look, one of the biggest cycles we're actually seeing in front of us right now is the opportunity to upgrade our install base. We've never had a better opportunity for cross sell and upsell. Part of what we've done over the last year is add extensions to our products. So that's true across our D&R and MDR install base. That's true across our traditional VM install base. We have more cross sell and upsell opportunities than we've actually had before. We've seen good initial pipeline build. Of course, we actually have significant campaigns that I actually highlighted in my prepared remarks for our sales teams to actually upgrade our install base. But we do expect, both over the course of this year and into next year, I would just say more robust performance on the expansion business and increases in net ARR as we actually go forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Roger Boyd with UBS.

Corey, I wanted to come back to the competitive environment in detection response and get your perspective on some of the M&A we've seen in that space, particularly with some of the MDR providers acquiring tools like Endpoint Security. In what ways do you see that kind of influencing the opportunity you have on that side of the business?

Like I said, it's a fragmented competitive space. You also will see from our prepared remarks that we're investing in the space. We're investing directly. We're also investing in partnerships in the space. I think it's one that it will be an evolving space. We're one of the, I would just say, larger players that actually has very healthy dynamics overall. I would just say if you look at our offering today, we actually sort of like partner including an OEM endpoint technology in there. We have lots of our own core detection technology. We've been extending our cloud detection response technologies. There's a lot of complexity there for customers. Most customers cannot manage the complexity of their security operations environment and the volume of data that they actually have. I think an integrated solution is the most powerful solution. I would just say if there's one requirement that trumps all others is customers cannot ignore critical aspects of monitoring. We believe customers have to monitor 100% of their environment and we're investing to actually do that and do that well. As you alluded to, others are making that investment. But again, it's a very fragmented space and we think our core value proposition holds up well.

Your next question comes from the line of Gregg Moskowitz with Mizuho.

It's Gregg Moskowitz from Mizuho. Corey, in your prepared remarks, I believe you spoke about an expectation to drive reaccelerated growth in 2025 and 2026 and the midpoint of the 2025 ARR guide does point to 1 point of acceleration. For 2026, obviously, you're not providing guidance at this time, but directionally speaking are you expecting additional acceleration in that 2026 year?

Look, the whole setup that we actually have is two things. One, we do think that D&R and our extensions on it have actually good long term sustainable growth dynamics. We wouldn't invest if we didn't think that there was accelerated growth opportunities. The second one that I would just highlight is we have a pretty big expansion opportunity within our install base. We built out the products last year, but we have to do it. We are anticipating continued long sales cycles. So this is why we're more conservative and thoughtful on the timing. That's why we have the wider ranges. But, yes, absolutely, we do expect to see accelerated growth in 2026 off the base of this year. And that's why we're making the investments that we're making. It's because we see the opportunities.

And we're investing now to prepare for it.

Just to clarify, Corey, but it sounds as though the reacceleration – and again, I realize that this is a longer dated question in terms of 2026, but it sounds like the reacceleration is kind of versus the 2024 baseline and maybe sort of a wait and see in terms of how 2025 ends up.

No, I think that we're expecting both the acceleration of 2025 over 2024 and 2026 over 2025. Again, we're going to provide an Analyst Day later this year to actually lay out those mid-range plans.

Our final question comes from the line of Brian Essex with J.P. Morgan.

Corey, was wondering if you share a few thoughts on North America versus rest of world. And if I just kind of look at the whole year on a trailing 12 month basis, international revenue accelerated while North America revenue decelerated. Anything you can share with regard to either macro, customer profile, attach rates, your go-to-market motion that would maybe help reconcile those growth rates. And which geographic region, either North America or rest world, gets you most excited and has you expecting the most contribution from as we kind of look into the next couple years.

If you looked over last year, it's interesting. You always have to be careful because it moves around from year to year. A couple years ago, we saw Europe as a challenge. Last year, we actually saw really strength in Europe and APAC that really accelerated. Also last year, you saw North America about midway through the year, especially some larger organizations, just sort of – like, their budget cycles where I would say not as strong as we actually expected or hoped they were. And that was something that we noticed, we talked to others about and seemed to be a bit of a factor last year. We're not expecting macro improvement this year, to be clear, our strength that we actually see this year. So North America will improve this year. That has more to do with the fact that we just have a full year of selling a more robust product set than it does any change in the overall macro. Keep in mind, we only had partial year selling Exposure Command last year. We had a more limited MDR offering last year. The extended customizable enterprise MDR offering that we recently launched will be available for this year. Those are the factors that drive it. It's our product suite availability is driving our productivity improvements in North America this year more than assumptions in the overall macro dynamics.

Anything really that you can take away from the customer profile in Europe that might have led to better growth this year, or is it more idiosyncratic than that?

Well, I think it's more idiosyncratic. Look, there's a lot of different moving parts because Europe's not a monolith. Look, we saw different trends in Germany versus the UK versus France. There was different trends in different geographies, different territories, different industries. So I can't give you a continent level sort of like synthesized view because that's just not where the trends operate. This is definitely an environment where you have to pay attention to what's happening in specific areas. Like, right now, I think Tim called out in his script is that, in North America, the healthcare sector is under more pressure incrementally this year than it was last year. There's some other sectors that are actually stronger. This is one where we just have to be paying much, much more attention to what's happening in specific customer environments. And our goal is to show up and say, how can we actually help you have great security operations and I think our team's set up and willing to do that work.

That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the conference back over to Corey Thomas, Chief Executive Officer, for closing remarks.

Thank you so much. Thank you all for joining us today on the conference call. And we look forward to updating you on the progress over the course of the year and connecting with you later on as we actually do our Analyst and Investor Day. Thank you.

Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.