Thank you for holding and welcome to Rockwell Automation’s Quarterly Conference Call. I need to remind everyone that today’s conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Jessica Kourakos, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you for joining us for Rockwell Automation’s fourth quarter fiscal 2019 earnings release conference call. With me today is Blake Moret, our Chairman and CEO; and Patrick Goris, our CFO. Our results were released earlier this morning and the press release and charts have been posted to our website. Both the press release and charts include reconciliations to non-GAAP measures. A webcast of this call will be available at that website for replay for the next 30 days. Before we get started, I need to remind you that our comments will include statements related to the expected future results of our company and are therefore forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ materially from our projections due to a wide range of risks and uncertainties that are described in our earnings release and detailed in all of our SEC filings. So with that, I’ll hand the call over to Blake.

Thanks, Jessica, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the call today. I’ll start with some key points for the quarter. So please turn to Page 3 in the slide deck. Organic growth of 1.4% was better than expected, with growth seen across a broad range of industries and across all of our core platforms despite a challenging macro environment. Going a little deeper into our vertical sales performance, oil and gas and mining each had another strong double-digit growth quarter. Life sciences continued to show solid momentum with sales growing mid-single digits and very strong bookings. Our offerings in cybersecurity, modular control and PharmaSuite MES, coupled with FactoryTalk InnovationSuite are extremely well positioned and aligned with industry trends. Food and beverage was slightly up, led by strength in EMEA that was partially offset by other regions. Automotive grew mid-single digits with growth in all regions except Latin America and with some important competitive conversions. In the quarter, we also saw increasing activity within electric vehicles, including a strategic win in North America that we look forward to talking more about at our Investor Day on November 20. Semiconductor, which is about 5% of our sales, was down over 10%, but flat sequentially. Our Logix business grew 3% even against a tough comparison last year where it grew 7%. Logix growth was broad-based across most regions and end markets. Adjusted EPS was $2.1, including a $0.14 impact from a restructuring charge and a $0.04 impact from Sensia setup costs in the quarter that were not included in our July guidance. Finally, free cash flow was very strong. Turning to Slide 4, and our regional sales performance in the quarter, North America declined 1%. Continued strength in oil and gas and mining was offset primarily by softness in…

Thank you, Blake, and good morning, everyone. I’ll start on Slide 5, which provides our key financial information for the fourth quarter. As Blake mentioned, fourth quarter reported sales were flat. Organic growth of 1.4% was better than expected, largely benefiting from better performance in automotive and food and beverage. Currency translation reduced sales by 1.5 points. Our fourth quarter results include a $20 million restructuring charge, as well as $6 million of Sensia setup costs, neither of which were included in our July guidance. The restructuring charge is split about evenly between both segments, with about 25% in cost of goods sold and the remainder in SG&A. We are reinvesting the majority of the $40 million savings associated with the restructuring charges towards our highest priorities, including commercial resources and increased software development. We continuously look for ways to streamline processes and drive internal simplification and productivity, enabling us to increase investments to fund profitable growth. Segment operating margin was 20.2%, down 60 basis points compared to last year primarily due to the restructuring and Sensia setup costs that I referred to. General corporate net expense of $36 million was up $18 million compared to last year. As you may recall, we had a large favorable insurance settlement in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. Adjusted EPS of $2.1 was down about 4% compared to the fourth quarter of last year. Excluding the restructuring charge and Sensia setup costs, adjusted EPS was up about 4% compared to last year. As Blake mentioned, we have very good free cash flow performance in the quarter, $451 million or over 190% of adjusted income. Reduced working capital contributed $150 million in the quarter. A few additional items that are not shown on the slide; average diluted shares outstanding in the quarter were…

Thanks, Patrick. Before we move to Q&A, I want to make some additional remarks. In fiscal 2019, we executed well and made good progress on our long-term initiatives. Looking to fiscal 2020, we have another exciting year ahead of us. We will continue to provide new value with the Connected enterprise, which gives us more ways to win. As a pure play, our entire focus is on helping industrial companies and their people be more productive and sustainable. We have no competing priorities. And our relentless focus allows us to grow revenue and efficiently deploy our resources to deliver high margins and increased earnings. Our strategy also generates strong, sustainable cash flow that we will continue to direct to value-creating opportunities. An example is Sensia, our joint venture with Schlumberger. Sensia officially opened for business on October 1 and is off to a great start. This joint venture is positioned to be the most innovative provider of process automation, measurement and IoT solutions to the oil and gas industry, and we are very excited by initial customer reception. In its first month of operation, we have already secured several large project wins from around the world, as oil and gas customers look to drive additional operating efficiency. In addition, we announced the acquisition of MESTECH last month, which augments our delivery capabilities for Information Solutions and Connected Services implementations, particularly in the automotive and life sciences industries. As we look ahead, our acquisition pipeline continues to be very robust. Our key areas of focus for inorganic investments remain Information Solutions and Connected Services, Process Expertise and Market Access in EMEA and Asia. While the size, amount and timing of deals can never be predicted with certainty, we continue to target a point or more of annual growth from acquisitions. In…

Before we start the Q&A, I just want to say that we would like to get to as many of you as possible. So please limit yourself to one question and a quick follow up. Thank you. Marcela, let’s take our first question.

Your first question comes from the line of Scott Davis from Melius Research. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, Blake, Patrick and Jessica.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Thanks for the update in the new segmentation. It seems to make a lot of sense, too. But I just want to talk a little bit about China. I mean China has been a pretty volatile market. I think some of your competitors have seen results meaningfully worse than yours, and so you’re doing reasonably well. But what’s the visibility that you think you have into 2020? I mean just some of these infrastructure projects fall off and then they need to be replaced by other things more substantive? Or are there other infrastructure projects that come in right after them? And maybe just give us a little bit of color on China.

Yes. So Scott, from a broad sense, I mean China is obviously the world’s largest manufacturing economy, and we have low share in China. And so we are relatively less impacted by the ups and downs of their volatility on the surface because there’s so much more that we can pick up. We serve a broad range of the industries, and there’s a lot of infrastructure to be built in China. So we expect that to continue. But also importantly, a lot of the spend in China is on the Information Solutions and Connected Services, drawing insights from the basic automation. And that’s relatively less impacted by CapEx spending. That’s more operational spending, and we expect to continue to grow there. So the long-term trends are still positive in China.

Okay. And you guys didn’t mention anything about the GM Strike in your comments. Was there any negative impact this quarter? Or should we build in for the first quarter of 2020?

Scott, there was a little bit of a delay in MRO spend from GM, but not a lot, and we expect that to recover.

Okay. Very good. Thank you. See you guys next week.

Exactly, Scott. See you then.

Your next question comes from the line of John Inch from Gordon Haskett. Your line is open.

Good morning, everybody.

Hey, John.

Good morning.

Hi, guys. Blake, in the guide – Blake and Patrick, in the guide process, you’re expecting to sort of soften to flat. How would that translate into sequential trends? And maybe you could sort of give us a sense of what’s happening kind of regionally in process? And I make the comments and the context, but Honeywell and Emerson, they had pretty good results actually in process, pretty good project activity in Asia Pac and so forth. What are you guys seeing?

Well, I’ll make a couple of comments and then Patrick will add to that. In North America, we continue to see strength in oil and gas, mining and pulp and paper. We do see some moderation in the coming year. I should point out that when we talk about oil and gas, that’s excluding Sensia, which we expect as we’ve talked about before, to grow double digits, which is a smaller part of the overall oil and gas market focused primarily at the digital oilfield, which we think will continue to grow double digits, and we obviously expect to grow faster than the market. In terms of the sequential performance, I’ll ask Patrick to make some comments there.

Yes. We don’t expect big swings by quarter, John, from a process point of view. And within process –

Relatively stable.

Say again.

I’d say relatively stable in, Patrick. Is that how you’re thinking about it?

That’s what we believe, yes.

Okay. I’m sorry, you were saying something?

No.

Okay. And then just out of that in that sort of – it’s part of this discussion. Oil and gas, how are you guys actually putting up such strong results? Do you think in oil and gas – especially on the land side, I mean peers, depending on sort of their activity interactions with oil and gas, we’re seeing insignificant pressures there, but you guys are not seeing that. Is it specific program share wins? What do you think is going on here?

Yes, we do think, and particularly with Sensia, we think that there’s big opportunity to continue to gain share. Remember, a lot of our participation is with more exposure to OpEx. So our exposure is not as much in drilling new wells as in getting efficiency from the wells once they’ve started producing, and so they’re not going to be as affected by volatile CapEx spend. And then, again, with Sensia, we think we have an opportunity to meaningfully accelerate our gains in oil and gas, particularly onshore upstream.

Just last, Blake. How would you characterize your level of conservatism in this guide? I think it caught a number of us – I mean to your credit off guard based on how sort of strong it is. If you go back a year ago, right, you were guiding for a midpoint of 905 and you did 867. So maybe you could – people sort of view Rockwell as a conservative company, particularly your guidance. You missed your guidance last year. How do you sort of put in a context to conservatism? And what makes you sort of comfortable that this range isn’t also going to potentially be a repeat of fiscal 2019?

Yes. I mean, John, I think, fundamentally, Rockwell Automation remains a conservative company. But there’s a lot of uncertainty out there, and we’re balancing that with what we know within our own four walls we’re producing and what we’re hearing from customers around the world in terms of their plans and the ability that we have to participate there. So we think that the flat organic growth is an appropriate balance between those two broad opposing forces.

Got it. Thanks very much. We’ll you see in a week.

See you soon, John.

Your Next question comes from the line of Jeff Sprague from Vertical Research. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

Hey, Jeff.

Good morning.

Good morning. Just a couple for me, please. First, just kind of level set on kind of the exit rate here on 2019. Did the dial back in investment spend and compensation in the fourth quarter occur as you should suggested and kind of what is the exit rate on those items?

Yes. So Jeff, from a spend point of view, we ended the year where we expect it to be a little less than – up a little less than 2% year-over-year. The fourth quarter was down a little compared to last year, again, as expected. From an incentive comp point of view, compared to what we shared with you in July, incentive comp expense was higher in fiscal 2019, given that we outperformed our expectations. And so the expense in fiscal 2019 was closer to $75 million compared to the $60 million that I shared with you in July.

Okay. And then you’re suggesting from that $75 million, you are stepping down modestly in 2020.

Yes, at the midpoint, about $10 million, Jeff.

Okay. And just looking at Latin America a little bit more closely, obviously, an extraordinarily strong quarter. How do you see that playing out over the balance of the year? Was there anything in particular unusual in the quarter there?

Actually, Latin America was strong in some of the consumer verticals, but particularly, oil and gas was very strong. Mining, pulp and paper, water – wastewater, all up double digits in the quarter. We do expect some of that to moderate in fiscal 2020. You may recall, Jeff, we also had a large Codelco mining project in Latin America. So we’ll have some tough comps next year. And so for next year, we expect that growth in Latin America to moderate a bit.

I would also say that earlier in the year, we saw continued growth from Brazil, and that continued to have positive growth through the year. But Mexico picked up partway through the year, and we saw a strong contribution as we exited from Mexico, which has good exposure to a broad range of the industries that we serve. It’s obviously oil and gas, but it’s Food and Beverage, Automotive really across-the-board.

And just one last one to clarify. The first half, down low single digit, that’s an organic number or a reported number?

That’s organic, Jeff.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. See you soon.

See you next week.

Your next question comes from the line of Julian Mitchell from Barclays. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Maybe – good morning. Just wanted to circle back on this notion of perhaps conservatism in the revenue guide and how you’re thinking about that sales guide because, I guess, three months ago, you’ve guided organic sales to be down low to mid-single digit in Q4, you just printed slight growth. Now you’re guiding for the first fiscal half to be down low single digits. So just trying to think, versus three months ago, do you genuinely feel worse about the macro environment? Do you view the Q4 performance is just a bit of a blip because of some movements in the Automotive sector? Maybe just try and characterize why you’re guiding for a decline now, if it’s just because of low visibility or there’s genuinely something you’ve seen that deteriorated in the last month or two.

I think there’s – as we talked about before, there’s a balance between what is undeniably continued uncertainty. We continue to see decelerating macro indicators, industrial production and so on. But then on the other side, we’re very optimistic about our ability to gain share regardless of what those numbers are. But we’re informed by, to some extent, what we saw in the fourth quarter, but also what we’re expecting the year ahead to show. Backlog, a little bit up, but not a tremendous amount, and we think it’s a balanced outlook on fiscal 2020.

Julian, I would just add that we’ve had one quarter of better-than-expected sales performance in Q4 after two quarters where we had weaker performance than we expected, and the macro indicators that we track PMI and IP are still weakening. And so we think that we’re balancing all of these things out.

I’d also say that we’re happy with the ability to have inorganic growth contributing to the year. It fits very well with our strategy, and it’s a meaningful contribution to our reported growth in the coming year.

That’s helpful and thanks also for the color in the slides. My second question would be on the segment margin guidance. So I think it’s guided to be flat ex Sensia in 2020 for the year as a whole on the segment margin line. That’s despite flattish sales not down, lower restructuring costs and net restructuring savings of $15 million coming in. So maybe just beyond incentive comp, talk about any other moving parts in that margin bridge. For example, it looks as if you’re dialing in a mix headwind perhaps because discrete is losing as a share of the total pie. Is that a fair summary? Or is there something else moving around in the margins in 2020?

I think the way you can think about it is, on the margin side, there is no organic growth, but there is some pricing that’s being realized. So there is some uptick there. As you mentioned, mix is somewhat of a headwind next year. Then the restructuring and then bonus expense clearly is a little bit of a tailwind. But our spend next year, our overall spend increase is not flat. Actually, we’re investing some next year and so our spend is up low single digits. A couple of points next year, a little bit less than that. And so the net of that is flat margins. So tailwind from price, headwind from, as I mentioned, some of the reinvestments that we’re doing in mix.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Tusa from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Good morning.

Good morning.

So given the kind of better-than-expected performance in the quarter, I totally acknowledge that your business is – the majority of it – vast majority is short-cycle in nature. How much kind of came towards the end of the quarter? And then to the extent you have a backlog or a front log, how much was like more of the kind of the quickest turn short cycle, if you will?

Yes. Steve, Patrick here. Actually, we – the sales improved through the quarter. September was our strongest month, but that is not unusual for September.

Right.

And so I’d say, improvement through the month, and as always, particularly September, tends to be the strongest month of the quarter.

So you were already kind of – you saw the trends through August and you were already kind of at the high end or above kind of the range at that stage of the game?

No. September was the strong month.

Okay. Were there any targeted pricing measures with regards to any of the business projects, et cetera, where you pushed a little harder to get the install on a price basis in the quarter?

No, I wouldn’t say that, Steve, at all. Our annual price increase went into effect in August as we ever see a little bump in volume due to price like pre-buys that nothing unusual there at all. And we don’t – rough price to get volume.

Got it. What is your price expectation for 2020 now? What kind of – what’s embedded?

About 1 point, Steve. Last year, we did a little bit less than 2 points, including the impact of pricing associated with the tariffs. And so for fiscal 2020, we’re targeting a little less than 1 point, about 1 point.

Got it. Great. All right. Thanks, I appreciate the colors always. Thank you.

Thank you.

See you soon.

Your next question comes from the line of Richard Eastman from Baird. Your line is open.

Yes. Good morning. Patrick, could you just speak to the 4 points of inorganic growth that you forecast for 2020? Could you split that between Sensia and MESTECH, a little bit is about $275 million of revenue. And is there any seasonality to think about with Sensia?

The way you can think about it is the vast majority of that 4 points, meaning more than – well more than 3 points comes from Sensia closer to 3.5 points or more, so most of that comes all from Sensia. And then in seasonality, I would probably say a little bit more second half weighted than first half weighted, also because we’re expecting to deliver revenue synergies as a result of the joint venture. So obviously, starting October 1, we’re recording all the sales, but we expect sales to accelerate in Sensia, given the synergies that we expect of the combined offering.

And that’s captured in the 3 – call it 3.5 points. That’s captured in there, the synergies?

Absolutely.

And then…

Yes. I don’t think – on a go-forward basis, I don’t expect meaningful calendarization of the results of either of those investments.

Okay. And then, Blake, could you just spend a second just around the dynamics. I think when you mentioned the PTC kind of wins, the dynamic there that – I don’t know if you said them, majority or many coming on competitor platforms. Just kind of mention the sales strategy around that and if that is going to provide some leverage here down the road onto the hardware side of your business.

Well, yes, happy to. So for many years, our fundamental play was providing an integrated control architecture to our customers. So typically, our Logix control was at the heart of that, and we would have operator interface, smart products like drives and servers and so on that will connect easier than anybody else in that architecture. On top of that, we now have greater capacity than we ever had to add information processing software that allows you to take the data from that control and to turn it into insights to drive additional productivity. And it works great when it’s sitting on top of a Rockwell control architecture, but it doesn’t have to. It takes data very well from our competitors as well. And what we’re finding, really to our delight, is that almost half of the sales are putting that software on top of someone else’s control system. And so it allows us to go into a brownfield, they’re not ready to change out their controllers yet, but it gives us a reason for being there and to add value into their operation. So it gives us more ways to win more customers that have a reason for being in their facility, talking about their business problems.

Got it. Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Rich.

Your Next question comes from the line of Josh Pokrzywinski from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, everyone.

Hey, Josh.

Just want to kind of step back a little bit, Blake, if you don’t mind. I think looking back over the last couple of years, there are points in time when I think people would have said, gosh, old Rockwell, if you want to call it that, might have grown a little faster. And now with this quarter, I think people would have assumed probably a little bit more cyclicality than what you guys put up. So is the case that because of some of these information services pushes and maybe some less cyclical end markets like Food and Beverage, which is obviously your largest end market, is it that the cyclicality is coming down? Or do you think that kind of cycle-to-cycle growth accelerates? Because I guess they are two different elements. I guess what’s the objective there?

We’re going after both, Josh. And as we’ve talked before and we’ll talk more next week in detail, the ways that we’re increasing our resilience to volatility involves the things that you’ve mentioned. It’s more recurring revenue in the form of subscriptions and as a service business models from Information Solutions and Connected Services. So we get a double benefit there. It’s growing double digits, but there’s also a very high component of that that’s recurring in nature. We’re also decreasing our volatility by greater exposure to process industries, which are typically later cycle than on traditional discrete areas. And then life cycle services being able to provide ongoing services after commissioning the initial projects, and we’re doing that with more urgency than I’d say ever before. And then finally, some of the inorganic investments, as we talked about, in a period of low or no organic growth, it’s nice to have 4 points or more from the inorganic growth. So it’s going to address both. It’s early. We got a lot of work yet to do, but I’m very happy with the results so far.

Understood. And then just a follow-up question around Sensia, obviously, that $0.05 in guidance has a lot of moving pieces. If you wouldn’t mind just kind of snapping the line if we were one year forward and all the noise comes out, whether it’s tax or some of the kind of onetime costs, what would that $0.05 look like?

Okay. Josh, Patrick here. The $0.05, if I look at what’s in there, they’re about $0.05 of fees and setup costs that are in there. And so we would expect that to go away. And the way we’re thinking about it internally is that Sensia is expected to be a 20% EBITDA business. This year overall adjusted EPS impact about neutral. We expect that to start to contribute to adjusted EPS next year. From a free cash flow point of view, it’s contributing to us in fiscal 2020.

Got it. But there’s also, call it, $0.20 of tax in there as well, right? So $0.05 higher for the fees and…

The way you can think about the tax, the $0.20 is the overall tax impact. The tax impact to Rockwell Automation shareowners is only 53% of that. So within the $0.05, it’s only $0.11 of tax. You have to adjust out the part that does not go through Rockwell Automation shareowners. And maybe this is an opportunity to provide a little bit more color on the $0.05 of Sensia on the bridge. Within that are obviously incremental earnings associated with Sensia, adjusted for the part of the earnings that no longer go through Rockwell Automation shareowners. So the incremental earnings are a little bit over $0.05, say, between $0.05 and $0.10. We just talked about the tax benefit, that’s about $0.11 benefit in fiscal 2020, but offsetting that are intangibles of about $0.10 and then the fees and setup costs that are about $0.05, as I mentioned. So those are the different moving pieces there. In essence, that tax benefit is offset by intangibles. They’re basically the same.

Got it. That’s helpful colors. Thanks for that. See you all next week.

Thank you, Josh.

Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Obin from Bank of America. Your line is open.

Good morning. This is David Ridley-Lane on for Andrew. What gives you confidence that automotive will be flattish in 2020? And how important are electric vehicles within your automotive trends?

Yes. So we saw – starting with Q4, we saw some recovery in MRO. We also saw continued spend from some of the projects that we’ve been talking about in internal combustion vehicles where we have line of sight to those projects, and that was a meaningful part of our performance in Q4. But a really bright part of the picture is the continuing importance of electric vehicle drivetrains. And for instance, in Asia, we had some good project activity at OEMs in electric vehicle powertrain, and we expect that to be a larger and larger part of our overall powertrain business going forward as a lot of manufacturers are going straight from internal combustion engines to full EV. It doesn’t look like there’s going to be as much demand as maybe was first thought for hybrid. People are going to total EV. And we’re very well positioned to play in that because it’s less subtractive manufacturing processes, REIT, C&C and metal cutting. It’s a really good fit for our current portfolio, and we’re winning some important competitive business there, and it’s growing fast. It grew strongly in the fourth quarter, and we expect it to continue to grow next year.

And then just following up on a comment that you had around digital transformation project. I know that a lot of your clients have set up offices and dedicated staff to those. Roughly what portion would you say your sales are driven by OpEx budgets today versus CapEx?

Yes, we’ve estimated it. We think about 65% of our sales are mostly driven by CapEx to balance OpEx. And you can think about some of the Information Solutions and Connected Services, some of these sales, we think, will come more out of OpEx budgets than CapEx budgets.

That’s right. A lot of times, the digital transformation that our customers are going through are on top of existing capital-intensive assets in the field. So the lines are out there, they’ve already got the basic automation in place that came with the original equipment, but now they’re looking to drive additional productivity out of those existing assets. And it can be meaningful double-digit increases and OEE and other metrics of productivity by adding this software to be able to analyze what’s going on, on the line. But often, those expenditures can be made out of OpEx and not CapEx.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thanks, David.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert McCarthy from Stephens. Your line is open.

Can you hear me?

We can, Rob. Good morning.

Good morning. Two questions. One that is a little different is can you talk about geography where you’re gaining share because it’s clear from the growth rates we’re seeing abroad that you’re gaining share? And talk about the key verticals where you’re doing that.

We think, Rob, for a long time, hybrid has been a great place for us. It’s where a lot of manufacturers are going. And so when you think about the trend towards smaller, but continuous process lines in Life Sciences where the control is tightly integrated with the software, that’s an area that we continue to have double-digit performance in because it’s just such a great fit for what we’re doing. In powertrain for electric vehicles, that is another area that I just mentioned that we have a very high readiness to serve. And I’ll tell you that there’s some opportunities around the world where we think that we’re gaining share in some of the installed base that might be a little bit older from competitive systems. So GE, for instance, is an area where we’ve had some nice wins in converting out some of that installed base.

And could you just comment on the share repurchase in the quarter and the average share price that you already have? And just any hints about 2020, aside from the $400 million in share repurchase kind of the state of play on the balance sheet?

Yes. Robert, Patrick here. The share repurchase were pretty much the same each quarter of fiscal 2020. I don’t have the average price we paid in the fourth quarter here handy. I think it’s going to come out later today, you’ll see that in the K. In terms of repurchase for next year, again, the $400 million, we expect that to be pretty stable across the fourth quarters.

Congrats on a great quarter. Thanks.

Thanks, Rob.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Joe.

Good morning, Joe.

Can you maybe just touch on Food and Beverage a little bit more? It switched from being slightly negative last quarter to slightly positive this quarter, and obviously, you’re expecting it to stay positive for next year. So any other color around what’s happening in that end market?

Sure. Food and beverage, we continue to see some subdued capital spending across Food and Beverage. On the other hand, it’s one of the verticals that we’re seeing particularly high investment across worldwide fleets in IoT. So they’re going in and they’re looking at benchmarking lines across their worldwide operations and finding ways to bring the lower efficient lines up to higher levels of efficiency, and the software being added on top of existing iron is a good way to do it. Also, interestingly, packaging OEMs in Europe picked up a bit for us in the quarter. And while, again, we need to watch how that plays out, that contributed to some of the good performance in Europe and some of the better-than-expected performance in Food and Beverage in general.

All right. Interesting. That’s helpful color, Blake. And maybe just a quick follow-on on Sensia. I know when you guys press released it last month, you referenced roughly $400 million in annual revenue, and now the expectation for 2020 is closer to $230 million to $240 million. What am I – what’s the disconnect between those two numbers? Is the $400 million a longer-term number? Or what’s the difference between the two?

Yes, very good question. The way you can think about it is Sensia’s overall revenues are expected to be over $400 million in fiscal 2020. The 4% that we refer to is the part that is contributed by Schlumberger to the joint venture. The part that is contributed by Rockwell Automation is already part of our sales. So that 4% that we call inorganic growth only represents the contribution of Schlumberger.

Yes. So for the one year – for fiscal 2020 only, it will be the total contribution to the revenue will be split between organic and inorganic.

Got it. That makes sense. Thanks guys. See you next week.

Thanks, Joe.

Operator, we will take one more question.

Your last question comes from the line of Andrew Kaplowitz from Citi. Your line is open.

Hey. Good morning, guys.

Hey, Andrew.

Good morning, Andy.

Thanks for fitting me in. So Blake, last quarter, you had said that you expect the downturn you’re seeing to last that long. And while several of your peers are talking about a more prolonged downturn, your results were relatively strong with your own expectations. So how at this point are you measuring the weakness you’re seeing out there versus previous downturns? You mentioned you were concerned about pushouts in CapEx. But are you seeing as we push out some projects versus what you expected? Or you’re generally seeing projects move forward albeit slowly?

Yes. We did not see the same degree of project pushouts in Q4 as we did in Q3. That being said, the macro indicators show deceleration in fiscal 2020, and we need to see more than one quarter of performance to draw a line between those points. So we remain cautious, but obviously, we’re pleased with the better performance in Q4, and again, our ability to compete and win for the business that is out there.

That’s helpful. And I wanted to ask the auto question maybe a different way. You were thinking that auto could be down about 10% for FY 2019, but obviously, up mid-single digit. And auto was a strong result in Q4. We know you’re projecting flat for FY 2020, but are you seeing the core auto markets stabilizing faster than you expected? And could these EV projects that you talked about actually lead to some upside for that flat auto forecast that you have for FY 2020?

Yes. I think over a longer period of time, there’s absolutely upside with EV as you have all of these companies, the traditional brand owners as well as new companies. And they have to bring vehicles to market to get a revenue stream. So we’re working with them. And all the ones that started a couple of years ago won’t make it to the finish line, but there’s a lot of exciting innovation out there that we’re participating in. We’re not expecting the industry as a whole to turn around. We’re not expecting SAAR counts to jump back up, but stabilization may be an appropriate word there.

Thanks, Blake. See you next week.

Yes. See you soon.

Let me quickly answer the question that Rob had. Rob, in Q4, the average price we paid for our shares was $158. And for full year fiscal 2019, the average share price we paid was $165. So with that, Jessica.

Thanks, Patrick. I think I’ll turn it now over to Blake for a few final comments.

Thanks, Jessica. So just to summarize, fiscal 2019 was a good year. We grew adjusted EPS 7%. We grew our core platforms, and Information Solutions and Connected Services continued to grow double digits. We also made some important investments. With this foundation, we are well positioned for the future, and we look forward to seeing you all in Chicago next week.

Okay. That concludes today’s call. Thank you for joining us.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.