Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Gibraltar Industries' Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. We will be conducting a question-and-answer session at the end of management's prepared remarks. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to David Calusdian, from the Company's Investor Relations firm Sharon Merrill Associates. Please proceed.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. If you have not received a copy of the earnings press release that was issued this morning, you can find it in the investor info section of the Gibraltar Web site, gibraltar1.com. During the prepared remarks today, management will be referring to presentation slides that summarize the Company's fourth quarter and full-year performance. These slides also are posted to the Company's Web site. Please turn to Slide 2 in the presentation. The Company's earnings press release and slide presentation contain forward-looking statements about future financial results. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the anticipated events, performance, or results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Gibraltar advises you to read the risk factors detailed in its SEC filings, which can also be accessed through the Company's Web site. Additionally, Gibraltar's earnings press release and remarks this morning contain adjusted financial measures. Reconciliations of GAAP to adjusted financial measures have been appended to the earnings release. On our call this morning are Gibraltar's Chief Executive Officer, Frank Heard; and Chief Financial Officer, Ken Smith. At this point, I will turn the call over to Frank, and please turn to Slide 3.

Thanks, David. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. 2016 was another successful year for Gibraltar. We achieved excellent financial results and executed well on all four pillars underpinning our strategy and we're continuing to drive the sustainable transformation of the business. Since we laid out our strategy two years ago, we made more money each quarter at a higher rate of return with a more efficient use of capital. And as Slide 3 represents, the fourth quarter was very solid noting the favorable comparison of adjusted EPS to prior year's quarter and the $0.30 per share also exceeded our guidance. The increase in adjusted profitability continues to be the results of the operational excellence initiatives within all of our operating units. While not shown on this slide, our full-year 2016 results were meaningfully higher than 2015 in several key financial measures, gross margin, operating margin, EPS, both GAAP and adjusted, cash flow from operations, and return on invested capital. And in addition to margins and returns improving, I want to use Slide 4 entitled base revenue to point out that our base revenues also have been increasing. In prior quarters we did not distinguish revenues affected by many proactive changes that we've made to our portfolio. Slide 4 drives from the appendix Slides 18 and 19, where we isolated the non-recurring portions. For example, divested businesses, exit from product lines, and completed but discrete contracts, and then compared the remaining base revenues year to year. On Slide 4, in each of the four squares, the darkest blue colored portion of each bar represents the base revenues and provides a better apples to apples comparison of our ongoing revenue streams. And in 2016, we’ve had base revenue growth compared to 2015 in two segments and the Company's consolidated base revenues rose 4% as compared to 2015. I will speak more about our strategic direction, 2017 guidance, and the future initiatives after Ken reviews our fourth quarter financials. Ken?

Thank you, Frank, and good morning, everyone. Let's move to Slide 5 in the presentation, entitled consolidated profitability rises. Starting with the reported revenues on the slide, the unfavorable revenue comparisons were expected as Frank just detailed and these amounts include all historical sources including from products and contracts we have or are exiting. Nonetheless, we continue to have strong bottom-line performance. And on the bottom half of Slide 5, specifically the bottom row reports our adjusted results for the quarter and annual periods, and both were strong and reflect the benefits of many 80/20 simplification projects, as well as other separate cost-reduction actions. Although not shown on Slide 5, the Company's consolidated gross margin improved at least 500 basis points over 2015 for the fourth quarter, the full-year and in both GAAP and adjusted measures. The consolidated results reflects strong improvement by two of our three segments, the residential products and renewable energy and conservation segments, while our industrial infrastructure segment has continued to deal with significant headwinds related to lower order activity from commodity and oil and gas markets, which in part influenced our decisions to trim certain of its product lines. Overall, we feel we’ve established a good balance between growing our businesses and thoughtfully trimming the portfolio, resulting in the right formula to make more money at a higher rate of return. Next I will talk about each of our three reporting segments, starting with Slide 6, the Residential Products segment. The reported revenues for this segment decreased due to a two-year sales contract for centralized mailboxes that we successfully completed in December of 2015. However, aside from that contract completion, this segment has continued to see steady demand for its residential products largely in line with the gradual improvement in new construction and repair remodeling…

Thank you, Ken. Two years ago, during our Investor Day in March 2015, we presented this slide, projecting the five-year path of a financial improvement using the dotted and solid lines that we could deliver based on the combination of actions, resulting from each of the four pillars of our strategy. On Slide 9, we've added text boxes to show our progress after two years, 2015 and '16, and we added text boxes in 2017 representing our 2017 guidance, that we will detail later this morning. As we again expect to deliver in 2017 more money at a higher rate of return, with a more efficient use of capital. Turning to Slide 10, titled trends continue up. Our 2017 guidance includes the achievement of these metrics in 2017 and these positive trends are a direct results of tactical actions taken by all our businesses under the four pillar strategy. So please turn to Slide 11, four pillars driving value creation. To reground ourselves, the Company's improvement continues to be based on these four pillars, our strategic initiatives. Slide 11, lists key achievements thus far, and in the succeeding slide I will provide more color on three of them. But I want to comment on Slide 2, Portfolio Management. We’ve executed on several aspects considered as portfolio management, including evaluations of product lines, customers, end markets and the allocation of leadership time, capital and other resources to the highest potential platforms in businesses. In 2016, as Ken cited, we decided to exit three platforms. Two where in our industrial segment and a third was our European solar racking business, which serve the residential rooftop market. One effect of these proactive portfolio management decisions is their positive effect on one of our goals of realizing a higher rate of return on invested…

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Ken Zener with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, gentlemen.

Good morning, Ken.

Frank, clearly you’ve transformed the DNA of ROCK. And I think all the questions today will be largely focused on solar. My first question is kind of multipart, but first, can you comment on the margin outlook versus 15% level that I think Ken guided to when you guys had the third quarter results? And related to that, can you talk about the sales and margin cadence that you expect with a detailed explanation of the change, i.e. the industry dynamic you highlighted regarding the price competitiveness, because it appears that that’s obviously impacting the 1Q outlook, A. And then why do you have confidence in the recovery for the -- to remaining quarters?

Well, this is Ken. I will start on that multipart question, Ken. To start with, we finished very strong in the segment and for the full-year 2016 17% operating margin, well above what we had imagined, but still in line where we were at the end of the first three quarters of 2016. So that high-performance certainly extended to the full-year and what we expect in our 2017 guidance for this segment is going to be in the neighborhood of 15% operating margin. So we’re not anticipating a meaningful sharing of those gains as we try to accelerate the top line growth. So there is -- its still going to be a high-performing unit inside Gibraltar just not the outsized proportions that it had in last year. Does that help at least one of your question?

That’s relative to what you’re looking for the year and just based on conversations I’ve had this morning with investors it sounds like -- and your guidance is down 15% for sales. And your 320 guidance for the year would imply a very strong 2, 3, and 4Q growth rate relative to the first quarter. So if you could explain how that pricing dynamic that was saving the strength in 4Q has impacted your backlog and where that confidence comes from that once your guidance is going to be lifting up as you move into Q3 and 4Q?

Well, let me put a little finer point on the 15% statistic. Only 5 percentage points of those 15 percentage points are attributable to RBIs top line change this quarter a year-ago. So the vast majority of the balance, the vast majority of the 15% is coming from product lines that we’ve exited, that we have reported sales in the year-ago first quarter. So that’s a strong fine point that I'd like us all to appreciate.

Yes, it seems -- I’m asking this obviously respectively given, what you guys have done to success you had doing things. It just seems that with the backlog slipping a bit, and if I’m not mistaken you guys were down in solar in 1Q tied to your backlog, how do you get the confidence that that’s going to be replenished given that you're moving to your price component? I mean, what happened in the market? Was that they coming off hyper competitive bids by competitors? If you could give us more flavor there, given the newness of the segments, I would appreciate it.

Let me give some context. I think Ken did a good job around discerning the difference in the numbers and the materiality of some of the portfolio issues that create some tough comparables for the first quarter versus the prior year. And also, at the end of the day, you’re right, the one core operating component ongoing that shows a shift in revenue is tied to the renewable energy piece which is the more most significant acquisition we've made. So let me start, first and foremost, the market dynamic out there hasn’t changed. There's still a market that’s going to grow today and long-term based on original research that we continue to validate that’s is going to have a 9% to 10% CAGR. So we have no reservations that if we buy into the right space and we have a belief that renewable energy, in specific solar is going to continue to play an ever-increasing role regardless of policy and shifts in tax credits. So that's our opening on this now. So now it’s a question of how are we affected in quarter -- from quarter to quarter activity relative to the market dynamics, as it relates to policies, procedures and related tax credits. So as we commented in last quarter, we expected underperformance in this segment relative to its prior year comparable 2015, where there was a forecasted end of the ITC tax credit, and there was a material drag for business into that fourth quarter 2015 that we expect it would create a very defined and a material disadvantage from a comparable on a year-over-year basis. That didn't materialize to the extent that we expect it. And as a result, we got closer -- we had a better fourth quarter '16 than we expected and that was primarily…

And a supplement to Frank's points, Ken, our orders through the month, the quarter to date orders thus far here in the first quarter of 2017, RBI has already booked more order dollar value through half of a quarter than they did in all the fourth quarter. And the expectation is what they’ve got planned for quotes out and securing win on projects for the balance of the quarter, feel very confident that we’re going to be back to our kind of a normalized order intake. So we've over performed, and will over perform the shortfall that we had in the orders here in the fourth quarter. And that’s why we continue to believe it's going to be just a short-term one quarter effect.

I do appreciate this gentlemen. And if I could perhaps put one bogey out there and see how you guys respond to it, just based on the investor questions I’m getting online right now. Is it fair to say that would you feel comfortable given your guidance that’s holding 2Q kind of expectations for solar for 10% total growth and a mid or a low teen EBIT margin, is that the bogey that you guys are suggesting it's fair to expect? Thank you very much. That’s my final question.

We are anticipating for the full-year 2017 that this segment is going to have a 15% operating margin. And each of these next three quarters Q's 2, 3, and 3 would be favorable comparisons to its prior year quarter as a result, because this is not only return to normalized order intake, but we've also got improvements coming from their continuing programs on their cost structure and the effects of new product launches that are coming fourth -- after the first quarter.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Al Kaschalk with Wedbush Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Al.

To some extent it may follow the prior question, but I'm wondering if there's a way to -- and if you’ve done this and I missed it in the presentation, my apologies, but is there a way to take through the billion dollars of revenue in '16, reset that down to what you’ve portfolio optimized or 80/20 or exited so that we can see that there is a -- whether it's 3% growth or 2% growth, what's the growth in the components of a flat revenue -- reported flat revenue line that you're now guiding to for '17?

Let me draw -- if everybody who has got access to the presentation slides, I’m going to talk about Slide 19 in answering your question, Al.

Right.

Which is where we’ve parsed out at least 2016 elements of the business that we’ve exited. And as Frank said, we don't have any such anticipated actions for 2017. So if we look at just the shaded bars in 2016 called ongoing base revenues compared to the 2017 as expectations for each of the three segments and the Company in total, I think would numerically answer your question where we’ve got 4% growth, we’re anticipating residential 5% and industrial and 8% in renewables for an aggregate consolidated performance expected this year in 2017 of the 6% increase. Hopefully, this slide can help answer that question you just posed.

Great. And then the -- on the renewable side, the only acquisition rollover benefit is applicable to renewable energy segment and that's included in that 8% growth?

We’ve -- it is, but we - -you can see the top of '16, the 2016 chart we try to normalize in arriving at base revenues, so that that 8% rise is really their base revenues, RBI only -- so excluding Nexus. So Nexus is going to be incremental, but we’re looking RBI itself got an 8% rise coming.

Okay. Okay. And then from a margin perspective, is the -- I think you provided the top consolidated margin performance of 100 basis points improvement. Is there any particular segment that's going to be driving, maybe an outsized margin contribution to the 100 basis points?

I’m just scanning at one of my aides here. We’re going to continue -- actually the short answer is there will be margin expansion out of our residential segment that we're expecting, we are going to be and now it's already at a healthy level, so its rate of expansion won't be significant, but it's still going to be climbing higher than 2016. Industrial infrastructure, pleased to say that we're expecting margin expansion there. The rate is going to be substantial, because we’ve -- we’re exiting lines that we've announced that it had -- there were drags in 2016. So there rate of improvement is the greatest in 2017 over the last year, but it climbs to 10%. And in the renewable energy, I need to correct an answer that I gave to Ken Zener, but I will do so with answering you, Al. We finished up with our residential segment at 17% for 2016 and we're planning 2017 to be at a 15% annual margin. So after we get past the first quarter, we will still have margin comps against 2016 that will be not as strong. But we’re hoping to put more money on the top line and more absolute operating income on its bottom.

Okay, right. All right. And then, maybe in a broader context, those very helpful, Ken. I appreciate that. I think it will provide a little more clarity for investors as well. In terms of the broader context, could we talk about maybe two areas are where I’d like maybe the -- your discussions currently are and that is one raw material cost, just a reminder some of us as to how we should be thinking about your exposure and then your ability to pass those through if there is a timing lag? And then secondly, given all the work you've done around the industrial and infrastructure space, are you seeing signs, I won't say green shoots, it's probably a poor word, but growth or project orders things that are going be converting to support maybe the top line growth that you're seeing now calling for in that sector?

Okay. Two distinct questions, but I will talk to the raw material factor and I’m going to reference Slide 16 where we bridged out 2016 adjusted EPS to 2017. And the second block in from the left, which is where we put in our estimate of what we think the initial first half primarily coming out of the first half of 2017 where we buy a lot of steel, it's probably 80% of our raw material purchase. The balance being stainless and some resins that fill out the remaining out of the 100% of our raw material purchase. And tail end of 2016 beginning of 2017 there have been increases in the cost to buy steel, and depending on the rate of improvement and the degree of the cost inflation, triggers what pricing actions will engage our customers with strategically, because we certainly try to provide value, a valued product at a competitive price to our competitors. But we've anticipated that we’re going to have a $0.12 on favorable factor in 2017 as we work our through -- work our way through what we anticipate to be some cost inflation net of pricing actions that we anticipate that we will be able to affect. So that’s one answer to your first question. On the industrial and infrastructure business, I would say we're not banking on a lot of market improvement coming out of the remaining markets that it serves, we do have some expansion of our products, new product launches, Frank touched on one. We launched at the end of the third quarter of perimeter fencing it is utilized our existing and long-standing expertise in fabricating expanded metal into a variety of end applications. You’ve seen architectural façades, product applications that this particular segment has taken from zero annual revenues to close to $15 million in annual revenues now. We hope to do the same here, launching and getting about full-year 2017 in fact with this new product line of perimeter security fencing which has some patent components that aid and speed the installation of such, which has been a very attractive feature for contractors that we’ve sold to and bid on. So part of this base revenue improvement and the infrastructure and industrial business is coming from new product penetrations and less so from what general market conditions, which I think are still going to kind of be a lackluster in 2017 across general manufacturing, process manufacturing markets that this segment serves.

Right. That’s helpful. Thanks. I will get back in queue.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Daniel Moore with CJS Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning.

Hi, Dan.

Maybe switch gears a little bit, Frank, and Ken, cash generation obviously exceptional this year over 3.50 a share. How much opportunity is left in terms with the current remaining portfolio in terms of working capital, and do you expect working capital to be a benefit or maybe a modest headwind in 2017?

I will start by ringing the bell on what our businesses have already done. So, as you know there are step changes in working capital. It's not one of these P&L sustaining year after year sustainment themes of cash, cash generation sources. And in inventory, specifically, if I dialed back I think it's, if I dial back 18 -- if I dial back 21 months, so just as we are getting underway at March of 2015 with our 80/20, we had inventory and if I adjust our inventories and took our acquisitions, inventories of Nexus and RBIs inventories, the date of acquisition we’ve -- and we added it to Gibraltar's inventory then. And compared to Gibraltar's inventories including Nexus and RBI at the end of December 31, 2016, our inventories are down $50 million on a starting base of a $140 million. I’ve been in the accounting for a long time with manufactures, that's an astounding drop and source of cash in such a short period of time, but it talks to the power of 80/20 simplification. So I’m -- it’s a long-winded part answer to your question that from inventory I think there's likely more to go, particularly, as we in line and only manufacture internally our highest volume products and turn those faster and faster through higher utilization throughout the course of a manufacturing day, week, month and year. And we outsource the products skews and inventory holdings for our smaller volume products that would be produced and held by our third-parties. So I think there's more to go on inventory, but I think the line share of inventory that’s $50 million, it's gone from $140 million kind of pro forma at 21 months ago down to 90. I don't think there is another $50 million coming out of inventory in the next 24 months. But I do think there is additional working capital improvement, I think that we will get out of the combined receivables payables action, that will be beneficial and could further improve a source of cash, again step downs in the next couple of years. And besides that I think we're also going to get some meaningful reductions in our fixed asset base, which will again be one-timers, but its outside the working capital element of sources of cash. So a long-winded answer. There's more to come, but I may not be -- its certainly is the same degree of what inventories generated for us.

And Dan, if you step back even further and look at the same context the working capital, invested capital that we're working on prior to the two acquisitions, if I recall the numbers in 2014 were somewhere in total invested capital is mid $640 million, at the end of the day today I think we finished somewhere in the $530 million range, $530 million, $540 million range, so we’re down $100 million in terms of invested capital, which includes the acquisitions being rolled in there, so in addition to the inventory component of it, the fixed assets and all the other aspects of an acquisition, whether its intangibles and so and so forth. So very impressive progress in terms of making more money and using less from an invested capital will ultimately drive the kind of returns we’re getting. So, is there more? Yes, absolutely to Ken's point in inventory there probably isn't another $50 million, but certainly as we structurally change some of our footprints to focus on manufacturing, the A items for our largest customers and to some degree outsource some of the B items, all that's going to lower inventory levels both at raw material, the elimination of work in process which by and large still exist, because we still to some degree making batch based processes by and large. And then, there's going to be a reduction in -- and its good inventories on the highest products without compromising service simply because the ongoing flow-through of those dedicated lines will ensure that we can react in a more timely way to the marketplace, instead of having built -- free building three-months worth of inventory in order to guarantee a level of service. So, the corresponding part of that is that as we focus on only making A items, we’re probably not going to need the same degree of fixed assets. So yes, we -- I think if we drop $50 million in inventory, which had originally the equal way to fixed assets on our balance sheet, we probably only drop just over $10 million in fixed assets. So I would expect, you put those two together, we’re not going to total $50 million, but I would be disappointed over '17 and '18 that we wouldn't get half the distance again. And that is more difficult work, its structural work, you better move equipment, you got to train people in different methodologies, we got to physically connect machines, create some automation aspects to what it maybe didn't exist in the past and then reeducate a supply line, a series of people to ensure that we got the raw material in the right place at the right time. So, we’re not done yet, but half the opportunity maybe at over twice the period of time to get there.

Helpful. I appreciate it. And then switching gears, in terms of new product opportunities, you mentioned metal roofing, perimeter security. Is it possible to sort of throw out a range of market opportunity for each of those, and do you see the possibility of acquire these areas that you would likely acquire as well or do you see its fully growing organically through internal R&D?

Well, I just frame it and then maybe Ken can provide some details. Certainly the new product development areas that we're investing in is the byproduct of end market research where we think that the markets we're targeting those new products organically to help enter are large enough and they’re rising tides in terms of the types of trends that are going on in the marketplace, and that’s certainly the basis for the organic new product development is the byproduct of that end market research. But it is also to your point, from a strategic accelerator perspective, if we see opportunities to get there quicker than just through our organic initiatives, then than are the companies we’re going to buy. Ken?

And tactically on the aggregate of these new product, the products that Frank noted, baked into these, that’s Slide 19 in our incremental base revenues in 2017 increasing is approximately -- I think it's close to $20 million across the sum of all new products having an impact on our top line in 2017. So, again it certainly be a meaningful improvement from across the security parameters, the adjacencies that were planning on for residential and the solar segments as well.

And that’s in new pick, would that $20 million include ExpressLockers etcetera or just the newer stuff?

It does include an element of the ExpressLockers, yes, which is off to a really good start.

Got it. Appreciate it. Thank you for the color.

You’re welcome.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Walter Liptak with Seaport Global. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks. Good morning, guys and congratulations on a great 2016.

Thanks, Walt.

I'll ask some questions that expand the conversation a little bit, and but just on a follow on first, on the cash flow, Slide 20, did you include any cash inflow from those fixed assets that you mentioned, and especially from the divestitures, is there any cash that we should expect in the first quarter?

Let me quickly, Walt, this is Ken. Let me quickly get to Slide 20, because I believe that what we depict on Slide 20 is cash flow from operations, and that’s one of four or five categories on the cash flow statement as you understand, in a different category the cash flow statements we would report cash from the sales of assets. So the -- for example we put a press release out a week or so ago about our bar grating product line and selling that to a third-party with an improvement in the cash position to exit that, that would not be reported on Slide 20.

Oh, great. How much do you think you will be taking in net of taxes?

It's an approximate $10 million.

Okay, great. And then was that the fixed assets that you are referring to, or are there other fixed assets that you would be thinking about?

Well, no, that’s the primary sources, the bar grating set of assets here in the U.S., is of significance. It's 20% of that segment's revenue, so the asset base that goes with it is meaningful when compared to the small German solar business that we exited. So the lion's share of that $10 million is really coming from the proceeds that we are advantaged by an unsuccessful sale of the assets.

Okay. Okay, great. And then switching gears to bridge bearings, that I think it gets close to 10% of total Company revenues now. What are you thinking about that for growth in 2017? And I think in your commentary, you said that 80/20 is now being implemented across the board. Is that D.S Brown now, and are they getting benefits from it?

Yes. Walt, its Frank. Let me just frame a couple of things in sort of our bridge and elevated highways business, the D.S Brown business and it's an important segment for us and we’re not unlike others, we've always been kind of waiting for the manifestation of a fast act bill that would kind of give some confidence to the individual states and the related DOTs within them to invest in longer-term projects and more structurally meaningful projects than what was going on with just one year extension. And certainly D.S Brown revenue base and skill sets relate to the larger more complicated projects of bridges and elevated highways. So in that kind of downturn of short-term extensions, we went through a series of downsizings and operational initiatives through the 80/20 process to ensure that we’ve kind of aligned our cost base and our ability to serve our customers proportionally. So we get a fast act bill that comes out and everybody has high expectations that within 6-month to a 12-month period of time that money was going to quickly flow into those larger more complicated structural projects and ultimately that would start to show up in elevated bidding activities and release projects and ultimately 12 months down the road, because there longer cycle kind of projects we would start to see that in the following year. A year-ago, we would have expected all that to start to flow in a meaningful way in terms of revenue, top line revenue in 2017 and I think across the board and it's not unique to us, the inability of the states to match the federal dollars within the fast act I think has created some problems in terms of the expectations, because a lot of these states have other priorities relative to balancing their budgets and providing services to through their individual residents. So, I think -- in a fact it's been the implementation and the value of that money has been kind of pushed out a year. We're certainly starting to see an elevated bid activity, we're certainly starting to win more of those bids, and we expect at the back end of this year to start to see some meaningful revenue opportunities flow out of that, but I think in the end our -- through our planning process and what our people know, it appears that the materiality of it is really going to start to show up in 2018.

Okay. So this year, 2017 flat revenue. Is that fair?

With a pleasant surprise that may or may not occur depending on some of the business in the back end of the year. It's over and above our current planning.

Okay, all right.

Ken, do you want to add any color to that?

No, that’s -- go ahead, Ken, if you have got something.

No, I thought Frank gave the right answer. I didn’t have anything additional here.

Okay, great. Thanks. And then, Ken, I wonder if we could just get a data point about now that the bar grating business is gone, how much O&G exposure is left, if any?

Well I haven't retallied it, but it's going to be quite small. For that segment, let's say they’ve got $200 million of revenue on our $1 billion of consolidated revenue. I don’t know maybe its -- I might guess a $10 million most.

Okay, great. And then last, just kind of turning to M&A, how much capital do you think now you’ve available for doing acquisitions?

Well, I think it's a lot, it’s a bit number, it's an ample number and one of Frank's slides that I’m having a tough time with my lousy fingers here to find, but one of the slides we have this morning talked about accelerating our strategic growth opportunity, Slide 14. So on 14, we penciled out our current cash balance plus our availability on current credit facilities. And what we think that could be at the end of 2017, if we didn't have any M&A activity. So it's essentially a $500 million amount of money with existing facility. So it’s a lot to go after -- well hopefully meaningfully sized, more meaningfully sized prospects this year that we can successfully close and I think we have the kind of balance sheet and EBITDA performance platform and runway that if we needed additional resources, we could get into those without overleveraging the Company. So hopefully 14, the number is on it, Slide 14 helped frame an answer for you, Walter.

Oh, great. Yes, thanks. We don’t have the slides open, but thanks for giving us that number.

Of $500 million …

Okay, great.

Of which [multiple speakers] is cash.

And then, Frank, how close do you think you’re to getting something done in any size? And then the last question I would have just on share repurchase. I guess we’ve been waiting a little bit for another acquisition, could we see a share repurchase in lieu or in combination with an acquisition?

I will take the first question. One of the things we certainly continued to prospect in all the markets we identified and we track about 70 different companies and on a given day that gets narrowed down into the 20, 25 range and then we're constantly kind of reviewing a short list of four or five and we’re always in some form of discussions with the hope that that one is going to get through the filter for all the right reasons. In addition to that process and that's where we stand today. In addition to that process, Ken and I, despite the nature of the improvements in our balance sheet from when we started a couple of years ago which to some degree was limiting and but even within those limits we're able to execute on RBI, which has turned out very nicely for us in a variety of ways. We are now in a position to look at companies, instead of sort of $25 million of EBITDA and below as part of our filter we're now in a position to be able to look $50 million north of -- into towards $100 million. We've never really set our sights on those types of targets in the past, either with ourselves or working with third-party banking organizations as partners, and over the last couple of months we certainly started that process and that that has opened up a whole other series of candidates for us that would be more material in size, not to suggest that we just want to do one big deal, but we’re not, we wouldn’t be hesitant to do it -- doing a couple of deals that total up for those kind of numbers would also be -- and being able to check a couple boxes in one or two or three of the target end markets would also fall in line. So it's our expectation, our desire to be able to work through some meaningful prospect in the first half of the year, so that we can get work -- start working on sort of the on boarding process throughout the balance of the year and ultimately get a full-year benefit in 2018. We are confident we can do that and that that's where we spend most of our time.

And on your question, Walter, about share repurchase, it just so happens that in our most recent Board meeting, which happened to be 24 hours ago, at which we gave a -- an updated view of our book financial plan for 2017. In the context of our LRP report out to them in the fall, this very topic came up around using our liquidity continued to fund the growth particularly with meaningful M&A to as Frank described and using a substantial portion of that liquidity on the right strategic acquisition and further solidify the markets that the Company participates in. That said, with that being our first priority for capital allocation, it's going to be a continuing question by our Directors of the Company led by Frank's recommendations on how do we use our resources and particularly what would be the timing and what would be the form of other uses of capital back to shareholders, including share repurchases or other means. So it is a very recent conversation again by the Board and its among their top mindful items as we continue to -- as they continue to monitor our performance and engage with Frank and the leadership team on how the Company is performing and filling out its ambitions on this five-year transformation. So no decisions yet, I guess is the punch line of my second answer here for share repurchase …

Okay. All right. Thanks very much, guys.

… [multiple speakers] but its top of mind.

Just to close that topic out, Walt, certainly not only is it top of mind, we’re conscious about making progress on an acquisition perspective, we think that’s the most meaningful and most valuable way we can use shareholder's money from a long-term sustainability perspective in terms of guaranteeing returns. That being said, there certainly we will be at a crossroads towards the end of '17 if we haven't been able to accomplish that. That to Ken's point, that we would certainly reflect hard on whether or not we would want to go into '18 without providing other opportunities for shareholders, in terms of the other alternatives he highlighted.

Okay, great. All right. Thanks, guys.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time we have reached the end of the Q&A session. I will now turn the conference back over to Mr. Heard, for any closing or additional remarks.

Thank you everyone for joining us today, and this concludes our call. Talk to you soon.