Greetings. And welcome to RingCentral Fourth Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ryan Goodman. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon. And welcome to RingCentral’s fourth quarter 2018 earnings conference call. I am Ryan Goodman, RingCentral’s Director of Investor Relations. Joining me today are Vlad Shmunis, Founder, Chairman and CEO; Dave Sipes, Chief Operating Officer; and Mitesh Dhruv, Chief Financial Officer. Our format today will include prepared remarks by Vlad, Dave and Mitesh, followed by Q&A. Some of our discussions and responses to your questions will contain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements. A discussion of the risks and uncertainties related to our business is contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is incorporated by reference into today’s discussion. RingCentral assumes no obligation and does not intend to update or comment on forward-looking statements made on this call. I encourage you to visit our Investor Relations website at ir.ringcentral.com to access our earnings release, slide deck, our non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliations, our periodic SEC reports, a webcast replay of today’s call and to learn more about RingCentral. For certain forward-looking guidance, a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial guidance to the corresponding GAAP measure is not available as discussed in detail in the slide deck posted on our Investor Relations website. We adopted ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018, under the full retrospective method. We have provided comparative numbers for the respective periods of 2017 in the slide and press release. Unless otherwise indicated all measures that follow are non-GAAP with year-over-year comparisons. A reconciliation of all GAAP to non-GAAP results is provided with our earnings release and in the slide deck. With that, let me turn the call over to Vlad.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining our fourth quarter earnings conference call. Fourth quarter was an outstanding finish to a great year for RingCentral. We saw no slowdown in momentum and we believe we further distance ourselves from our competition. Revenue, operating margin and non-GAAP all exceeded the high end of our guidance. The performance in the quarter was driven by strong execution in the mid market and enterprise business combined with continued momentum with our channel partners. We closed at record number of seven digit TCV deals in Q4, breaking the year total to approximately eight such deals. I am also excited to announce that we secured our first ever eight figure TCV deal in Q4. We are seeing enterprises of all sizes moving to the cloud. Let me cover some of the key metrics for Q4. First, total revenue grew to $189 million. This is 34% increase year-over-year and above the high end of our guidance range. Second, our core subscription revenue normalized for the legacy AT&T base grew 38% year-over-year, up from 36% in the same quarter last year. Third, mid-market and enterprise business continued to be a key driver of our outperformance. We define mid-market and enterprise as 50 seats or greater. This grew 73% year-over-year and it’s now a $309 million annualize business. Our enterprise defined as customers with $100,000 or more in annual recurrent revenue or ARR nearly doubled year-over-year to $171 million. Fourth, our general business grew over 80% year-over-year to over $180 million with channel contributing a record number of seven-digit TCVs deal for the quarter. We are seeing a dollar is shifting towards cloud communications solutions from legacy vendors in this $50 billion market. This is consistent with the recent report published by Gartner titled Cloud-Based Unified Communications and Contact…

Thank you, Vlad. It was a great quarter and we are pleased with the continued strength in our mid-market enterprise business. We attribute the strengthen to our efforts and expanding go-to-market capabilities, our rapid pace of product innovation and our success with land and expand. On the GTM front we are focused on three key areas driving our success. One, expanding direct sales reach, two, growing the channel, and three, pushing ahead with our targeted verticals industry program. First, throughout 2018 we further intensified our direct enterprise sales force across major U.S., U.K. and Canada metro markets, as well as expanding in France and Australia. An example of continued international momentum in the U.K. was our Q3 win with the financial times, which we have now followed in Q4 with the seven-figure plus TCV win, with a second major news and media organization. This new customer had a past experience with disruptive events shutting down their legacy on-premise system. Our highly fault tolerant, distributed and mobile first cloud architecture was critical in addressing their unique business continuity needs. Furthermore, our Global Office and open platform integrations with Google G Suite and other cloud applications were also key in securing this win. Second, we increase our coverage in the channel with strong growth in new partners. Channel contributed more than 70% of our seven-figure wins in Q4. In addition, we announced re-engagement with AT&T in late 2018. We have initiated enablement and training other sales force. We are encouraged with our progress to-date and look forward to growing this partnership in 2019. Third, we increased our GTM focus on vertical industries, initially targeted at financial, healthcare and FLED [ph]. In fact, in Q4 we had several seven-figure wins in each of these verticals, comprising more than 30% of our seven figure…

Thanks, Dave, and good afternoon, everyone. 2018 was another good year, we exited with the revenue run rate of over $750 million, our growth rate was 34% and our operating margin was approximately 9%. We are executing above the rule of $40 million, a combination of revenue growth and operating margin. We believe that the rule of $40 million is a key metric to evaluate profitable growth across SaaS companies and is a high bar we will strive to sustain. Our fourth quarter capped the year with strong performance on all key financial metrics. Total ARR grew $726 million, up 33% year-over-year and ARR for RingCentral Office grew to $644 million, up 38% year-over-year. Key drivers continue to be mid-market and enterprise, with strong contribution from channel partner. Mid-market and enterprise had under standout quarter, with ARR up 73% year-over-year to $309 million. Enterprise ARR nearly doubled again to $171 million. We also secured a record number of seven-digit TCV deals, including one eight-figure deal. In fact, the average deal size of our $1 million deals increased more than 40% year-over-year. This was a combination of both higher ARR and longer contract. In other words, with our highest value customers we are seeing growth in the number of wins and the wins are getting larger and the configurations are expanding. This expansion in mid-market and enterprise has multiple positive impacts to our overall business. First, higher upsell, we yet again saw strong performance in new bookings from our existing customers. This represented over 40% of new business mix in the quarter. Second, reduction in churn, in 2018 annualized office gross churn for the first time in dipped below 10%. This was driven by a mix shift towards larger customer as mid-market and enterprise churn is half of the small business…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Nikolay Beliov with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions and congratulations on solid results. I had a question for Mitesh first and a follow-up for Vlad and Dave. Mitesh, when you look at the eight-figure deal and new logos in general and when you think about upsell, how does it flow into ARR?

Sure, Nikolay. So a three-part question, the first one is on new logos then what happen in land and expand, our upsell and then how does it show up in ARR. So let’s start with the first one, which is new logo. If you look at the eight or the seven-digit TCV wins we announced, about 8% of those deals were new logos, which is very consistent with the last quarter, which was a high watermark, so very solid performance on new logos. When it comes to upsell or land and expand, when we have -- when we deploy an initial customer, the initial deployment is usually a small subset of the overall potential, so that gives us a chance to go to the well multiple times. Dave in his prepared remarks gave an example of Heartland Dental, where we now have a commitment of 6,000 seats up from 4,000 seats, but the best news is that the potential for this customer is over 10,000 seats. So this is just one example of how several thousand -- hundreds of customers are upselling. So that’s new logos and upsell, and the way it shows up at ARR Nikolay is that, when we land a large deal, we only include in ARR the number of lines or users that are provisioned. So, for example, for Columbia in our Q4 ARR only less than 5% of the deal value shows up and so most of the committed opportunity is going to be showing up in ARR in the future.

Got it. And Vlad a quick question for you, when you look at the evolution of RingCentral you started with small business, you move to medium enterprise, large enterprise, and you would be highlighting Global 2000, G2K deal. If you think in terms of many G2K customers you have at this point. How longer the sales cycle could you win again. Any color here will be helpful? Thank you. That’s it for me.

Yeah. This is Dave Sipes. As we move into the larger and mega large enterprise, we see -- I think the question was like sell cycles and how are we executing, obviously, this was a record number of $1 million deals in the quarter. We did 80 or so for the year and sales cycles in that range averaging in the nine months to 12 months timeframe and we are seeing good progression of our -- of pipeline in that area.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of George Sutton with Craig-Hallum. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you, guys. Great results. Mitesh, I am wondering on the enterprise side, I wanted to ask last question a little differently. You gave some compelling metrics to begin relative enterprise. I wonder how can you or how do you plan to hit that accelerator on enterprise opportunity going forward. It would seem we are on just the early stages of this big move to cloud with the larger company. Help me understand…

Sure.

…sort of the trajectory there?

Yeah. Sure, George. Just to recap, mid-market and enterprise showed really strong strength. It’s $170 million business, grew close to 100%. And it’s actually quarter of our Officer ARR, but if you look at the forward-looking indicator, it’s more than -- about close to 40% of the bookings of office is enterprise. So that’s part one. Part two is, we did see a broad based strength there and in the entire enterprise segment. And as Dave said, we did signed close to 80 deals over $1 million for the entire year and if you double click on this momentum, you see overall the deal value actually went up 40%, both because the customers are larger and the duration is getting extended. So that’s sort of the backdrop for 2019. When you look at the drivers for 2019, there are really three key drivers how we plan to step on the gas here. One is, the sales force, right. We will keep on densifying our enterprise sales force in the key regions, that’s part number one. Part number two is channel, if you look at the Gartner they had a stat that by 2022 for every one seat deploy for on-premise, there will be four seats deployed for the cloud. So this now impacts the channel in a way that they are now going to be more behaved to work with players like RingCentral in the cloud. And the third one is our port -- expanding portfolio, with the RingCentral Engage it is now -- right now predominantly a play in just France and somewhat of EMEA with large brands, we now hope to cross-sell this in the future to large enterprises in the U.S., given the changing consumer behavior. So, I think, would -- if you look at the overall deal wins with larger enterprises going to the cloud and plus our doubling down efforts with the GTM and product portfolio, I think, that’s the way we think about 2019.

Perfect. Just a quick follow-up on the contract duration extending, that’s I think an impressive indication that there is more of a commitment on the part of the buyers. Could you give us some way to quantify that duration expansion, maybe a little bit more keys behind it?

Yeah. It’s been hovering around call it plus or minus two-ish years on an average and we saw a slight uptick, not very meaningful, but it did go in the right direction with a slight uptick.

Our next question comes from line of Matt Statler with William Blair. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. It’s Bhavan here obviously. Congratulations. Nice job there. I guess, maybe starting off, again, with you Mitesh and I am going to follow-up with Dave and Vlad. But just you have the biggest beat you have ever had in revenue, certainly, on the topline and certainly guidance was ahead of expectations at least with consensus. I guess, as you think about your philosophy and the team’s philosophy of balancing growth with margin, you touched on the rule of $40 million, you are certainly growing and potentially you could grow just as fast in ‘19 as historically? And so how are you sort of balancing that between the growth rates and sort of investment in sales and marketing should drive some level of profitability. Just trying to understand if there’s been any change in philosophy and how you guys think about ‘19 and maybe in the little longer about those two metrics?

Sure, Bhavan. So let’s talk about growth versus margin, our favorite topic in the SaaS business. So, yes, so thank you for acknowledging. We did have a -- yeah, we did have a strong quarter across the Board. Most of the chips did fall our way for two reasons. One, is the market itself definitely coming to the cloud. And second is we -- RingCentral did end up taking share from other cloud providers. So I think it was a double whammy there for us in a good way. And if you look at how we beat, so we beat the street estimates by call it plus or minus $8 million and about 40% of that beat flowed through to the bottomline. Now think of that 40% as being our inherent leverage in the model, where you can look at this as the incremental revenue margins as a proxy for the installed based recurring margin. When you look at a SaaS model, there are two drivers, which drive this inherent leverage in the business model, first, is churn, and second, is upsell. So if you look at churn our customers are definitely staying longer and you saw our gross churn perk down less than 10% for the first time, that’s one. And second in upsell we are seeing customers buy more from our platform and we did report that about 40% of our new bookings came from existing customers, so with these growth and growth economics more so, I think, the bias Bhavan is going to be toward dialing for growth, no change from the past. But that said, it will show some margin expansion as we have been showing and we are going to be committed to be hitting the rule of 40.

Got it. Got it. It’s helpful. You touched on competition, Mitesh, so I will turn it over to the other guys on the call. You have been taking share from other card providers, but ShoreTel kind of disappeared, they have been such, you said before that’s sort of you have seen more of an inflection and people, the ShoreTel comes up for renewal moving over to you. I guess, just any sense of the competitive environment sort of is the takeaway at the enterprise level, which feels like it, but you sort of seeing the mid market also being a fairly competitive takeaway and is it still largely from on-premise players like a ShoreTel, Mitel equivalent or is it more from sort of your primary card competitor, who you keep leaving further product behind. Just some color on the dynamics in both the mid-market and enterprise around competitive environment? Thank you.

Yeah. This is Dave Sipes. The vast with majority of the market is obviously on-premise solutions that people are moving away from and looking to buy cloud solutions. And we see that point accelerating, we see Gartner talking about that accelerating over the next few years. We see the largest replacements that we are doing are typically the Cisco, the Avaya, the Mitel, are the biggest ones in the market and the most common that we will replace. We also will compete in our largest deals or $1 million deals, well, typically be one of those key legacy providers that we are replacing. That dynamic has stayed true and our win rates against those legacy solutions have sustained like very strong, actually saw an uptick against those players this quarter. So we see a greater momentum from the buyer and a stronger emphasis on cloud and cloud functionality that’s helping us migrate that segment of the market over.

It’s awesome. Thank you, guys. Congrats.

Our next question comes from the line of Terry Tillman with SunTrust. Please proceed with your question.

Hey. Good afternoon, gentlemen, and I will also say congrats on the numbers and the outlook. Looking forward to one day seeing maybe a nine-figure TCV deal, but anyways, specifically, my first question relates to, and sorry for this bad throat I have, how it sound. Related to recent acquisitions Dimelo and Connect First, maybe Mitesh could you talk about, I think, initially they were going to be immaterial to the model, but maybe as we look at the 2019 guidance, what kind of revenue contribution can you talk about from those two acquisitions specifically?

Sure, Terry, your voice sounds fantastic, by the way and…

Compared to mine for sure.

Yeah.

By the way…

And the nine-figure deal in due time, so but to answer your question, look both of these acquisitions Dimelo and then Connect First were really technology tuck-ins and it was mainly to broaden or expand our product portfolio to crack open new addressable markets. So and the focus for 2019 for both these acquisitions is going to be on integrating both these products onto the RingCentrtal platform. So if you look at what contribution we have dialed in, it’s very insignificant, especially after you consider the deferred revenue writedown. So but the hope long-term, Terry, is that with our investments on integrating these products this year, long-term we hope to achieve more cross-sell synergies there to take both these products to our install base longer term.

Okay. And I don’t know if this is for Vlad or for Dave or for your Mitesh. But my follow-up just relates to what the user conference last year talking about the unified mobile app bringing it all together. What I am curious about is for some of your installed base, is there any kind of GTM efforts to really push them to move to the new app and if so, could that be an incremental driver of cross selling or upselling as we move into ‘19? Thank you.

Yeah. This is Dave Sipes. So I think the question is that with the new unified mobile app. We are pushing the installed base that’s something that we are focused on over the next couple quarters. We see a lot of advantages in the unified mobile app, a more unified experience ability to utilize plus team messaging, video and telephony in one go, and having a seamless experience across that. I think it’s a huge advantage for the customers. We see very good adoption from our customers that have already moved over to that and we do see that as becoming the permanent application of the future for RingCentral. It does create greater exposure to other products and services, and allows greater adoption across the suite.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks. Congrats guys. First a question on the Columbia deal. Can you just give a detail on how the students will use it, like is it tied to kind of class threads or will it be used for talk between students, just a little bit of detail there would be helpful, maybe to start.

Yeah. So we are rolling up team messaging in collaboration across the student body that’s something focused on, it will start with different departments, different departments within the student body and a key aspect is the Learning Management System Integration that was core to the decision to move to RingCentral and it was key that our platform supports these capabilities. So that’s been important aspect of that so.

Okay. Got it. And then maybe just on kind of direction of R&D, last year you guys talked a lot about it being used to expand international presence with kind of 30 countries outfitted, is direction more contact center and integrating some of the development Contact First integration. Just if you could kind of give a direction of where that spend is going?

Yeah. So on the product innovation side, a key aspect is as we made these acquisitions with RingCentral Engage is built upon the Dimelo product suite and Connect First is creating integrations and a unified platform between those products, as well as moving everybody over to the unified app, our global capabilities continue to grow as we are approximately 40 countries now on Global Office and we look to continue expand there, as well as a big emphasis on our open platform development, which we have had doubling of growth every year for several years with over 1,800 certified apps.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Peterson with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the quarter. So, Mitesh, just wanted to expand on your channel comments a bit, could you talk about how we should think about the growth and the margin implications of the channel expansion in 2019?

Sure, Brian. So, yeah, let’s talk about the channel performance in ‘18 and then we will talk about the -- how we see ‘19 shaping up in terms of penetration and then what it means for margin and profit for the business model. So look generally it has been a crown jewel, it’s been a stellar performing vector for us, $180 million business, growing 80% quarter of our business. So it’s been amazing in that sense. And if you look at 2019 versus ‘18, we are still, if you talk to channel partners, it’s still in the very, very early stages, so both internationally and in the U.S. So the playbook is going to be similar where we are going to be adding some key channel partners in ‘19 and then that’s A, and part B is also densifying our coverage within the channel partners we have, so sort of a two-pronged approach there, which has been serving as well. Now as relates to profit and economics, as you know, Brian, for us, it’s always profitable growth and not really grow at all costs and we really look to that mantra there. So if you run the channel through the model -- channel economics through the model, the cumulative profit dollars for channel are accretive to the business and a higher than direct for three reasons, one, is that the payback is faster, there is no other incremental material sales and marketing dollars you have to spend, and the overall churn is lower in the channel. So these three vectors actually offset -- more than offset the upfront costs we have to pay and the residual payments we have to pay for the channel. So and then, again, cherry on top, if the channel does free up extra investment dollars for us to invest those dollars in the direct sales and marketing, which then accelerate the growth. So I think, net-net, I think, channel is here to stay and it’s accretive to the business.

Got it. Thanks, Mitesh. And just one more, just on the vertical opportunities you mentioned, is there anything that you can share in terms of who you are displacing, deal sizes, ARPU or any unique value proposition that you are adding for the three verticals you mentioned? Thanks, guys.

On the verticals, we continue to win several deals in each of our core verticals sort of from financial services, healthcare and state and local education. We announced Columbia, but it wasn’t our only higher education win, there were a couple other million dollar TCV higher education in there and that’s a vertical we have had success with previously. Additionally, we have signed additional cooperative buying agreements with Nasper on tips that will help us add additional state municipalities in the future. And on the healthcare, we have had many successes, we continue to have success such as Heartland Dental and expansion there, and continue to see success in medical clinical areas within healthcare.

Our next question comes from the line of Samad Samana with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good evening. Thanks for taking my questions. Mitesh one for you, this looks like the strongest quarter-over-quarter change in net new ARR for a fourth quarter in the last few years. I was wondering if there is any change in seasonality for new large deals or if there is a more and more seasonality favoring fourth quarter in terms of renewals. Just something to help us as we think about our models for ARR going forward then I have a follow-up question.

Yeah. If you look at the sequential trends Samad, sequentially for office call it between 8% to 9%. If you look at Q1 of this year it was little over 9%, this quarter it was little under 9%. So it’s not that unusual, but that said, fourth quarter is sequentially pretty strong for us and though that’s driving some of the strength there, so it was pretty broad based.

Great. And then Dave, I wanted to follow-up on the government contract vehicles. I know there’s a couple press releases last week highlighting it. Could you remind us, maybe what type of penetration the government property or what percentage represents an ARR? And then just remind us if you guys are federal and certified already and how you see breaking into the federal opportunity maybe going forward or how should we -- we should think about that opportunity ramping for RingCentral and maybe 2019 and going forward?

Yeah. These are still early opportunities for us on the state and local. We have obviously had a lot of success in education, both higher ed even in K through 12. We see this as an opportunity to expand on that to get into state and local additionally at a significant pace. We have increased our staffing in that area, focused on state and local, within our sales team and dedicated personnel in that area. So it’s an opportunity there. As far as federal government, FedRAMP is something we are working on, at this point, we don’t have a timeline yet though, we are projecting. But that will be additional opportunity I’d say that would follow as we see this success in educating state and local and then move to federal after that.

Great. Thanks again for taking my questions and very nice quarter guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Turrin with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. Thanks. Good afternoon. I wanted to talk a little bit about the Connect First acquisition. Could you spend a bit more time perhaps walking us through how this complements the Engage platform you have built on Dimelo and what you are now able to bring into the Contact Center market, as well as how you are thinking about that opportunity set today?

Yeah. The -- we have -- we think are bringing best-in-class world class solutions to customers with the traditional RingCentral Contact Center, inbound capability and Engage brought the ability for digital customer engagement that is allowing the way in the new workforce and new consumers or communicating with businesses. And Connect First is a world class outbound capability -- outbound blended capability that starts penetrating a little more into sales and marketing lines of business outside of, say, customer support lines of business. So it adds to the breadth of the solutions, as well as it gets affected to some additional buying organizations within the companies that we have already sold to or prospecting with.

Okay. Thanks. And then maybe one for Mitesh, you have talked in the past around expectations for call it 75 basis points to 100 basis points in margin expansion per year. You gave us more than that this year and the initial guide for 2019 maybe implies a touch less than that for next year, is that just a result of the slight toward growth given you have been accelerating the topline or is there anything else you would like us to take away there? Thanks.

No. Nothing material for you to takeaway there, Michael, if you look at the starting of the guide from last year, if you probably would seem to be similar, there is nothing too much to read there. I think the overarching theme, I think, what we need to keep in mind, at least the way we are driving the business is toward the rule of 40 and I think growth plus operating margin that’s where we strive to achieve. So 50 basis points, 75 basis points is just it’s in a noise there. But I think we will show operating margin expansion despite these two -- despite taking on some of the investments we have to make for these two acquisitions and so I think that expansion is here to stay. But, overall, I think, it’s a rule of 40 where we strive to achieve.

Thanks for taking the questions. Congrats on the strong results you have done in the year, guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Sterling Auty with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Yeah. Thanks. Hi guys. Back on the idea of competition and market share shift, I am wondering from this perspective, you are obviously winning in terms of the customer wins, but you are finding that you are further pushing out or displacing other vendors as the primary vendor in the channel. I remember the panel that you had at the Analyst Day, I think, couple examples. I am just wondering are you seeing that as a growing trend especially the resellers that are able to bring you in some more of those up market opportunities?

I think we have had a lot of success in the channel, we see its continuing to grow over around 80% year-over-year. We have built a strong reputation in the channel by supporting the channel both in the selling activities and in the customer retention activities and we have built a brand that we can deliver across some of these key new accounts, as well as upselling into existing accounts. An example, Copart which we mentioned on the call was sourced by a new partner that we just secured last quarter and this was the first deal they brought to us. So it’s showing a willingness to partner with us on the largest deals and confidence that exists in the channel. So, we feel good about our position there and continue to work strongly with our partners in our go-to-market replacement of legacy solutions.

All right. Great. And then one follow-up would be, now that we -- looking at the end of 2018 versus the end of 2017, can you quantitatively or at least qualitatively describe where we are in terms of the size of the go-to-market sales and marketing force. So how much did that headcount grow and how much of that was geared specifically toward that mid-market and enterprise versus traditional segments?

Sure. Sterling, so I will give you some data points, which would help frame the -- frame what you are asking. If you look at where the investment dollars went in terms of GTM, they all mostly went toward the mid-market and enterprise sales force, so that sort of point number one. And if you look at the clip of growth of these investments for quota carrying headcount, we -- the growth was lower in our overall AR growth -- ARR growth, because we have seen some improvements from these segments ramping and maturing overall. So more reps are ramped and are hitting quota. So that’s the way to think about it, where we are growing our sales force shy of our overall ARR growth given some of the efficiency we are seeing.

Got it. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Will Power with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks. Yeah. Just a couple of questions, so let me maybe first start with Columbia, coming back to that way in which it looked terrific, I’d love to get any kind of color you are able to provide on the RFP process, it sounds like you are displacing on-premise provider. Were there other cloud providers participating for that, it sounds like messaging was a key piece of the win, but I guess as you step back, what were the other key attributes that really helped you stand out among the bidders there? And then the final piece there is maybe I missed this, but is Contact Center part of that and is that maybe still an opportunity?

Sure. Yeah. So, Columbia, we have been in discussions with for a while for probably a couple of years. So we have -- they have been a customer in their graduate school with Teachers College Columbia, but the main campus was running legacy solution as you mentioned, we competed against probably the market-leading legacy solution and won against that. So it was kind of an on-prem versus cloud decision, but they went through and the scalability of our platform was critical, the integrations, as I mentioned earlier, about the LMS integration, but as well, integration with Google and ServiceNow were examples of helping win that and there is a smaller component of Contact Center at this point, but that’s additionally -- but the bulk of it is the UCaaS opportunity at this point in time.

Okay. That’s great. And then my second question, I just want to come back to international too, I mean, you referenced there were nice win in the U.K., any other color you can provide on what the international growth look like in the quarter, percent of revenue, it feels like you are making nice headway across the Board on that front?

Yeah. We continue to have success and we have seen it in the $1 million deals coming out of that market and our team there has grown significantly. So we are having better recognition and better success. The percent of revenue is something that continues to grow, probably a little faster than overall. But we see both the U.K., we have had success in Australia and now we are expanding into France, so we see additional expansion opportunity international going forward.

Okay. Great. Thanks.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Dmitry Netis with Stephens Inc. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. I guess, I am just wondering about guidance for subscription revenue for Q1. So this is a recurring business and if I roll your annualized monthly subscription run rate, plus some of the net new business that you acquired, which was quite strong this quarter, right, plus the record low churn, I come up with $179 million, $180 million for Q1 versus your guide of $177.5 million -- $175.5 million to $177.5 million. So I am wondering if I am missing something and why this growth decels to 28% given your run rate growth rate in the last four quarters is 32%?

Sure. Dmitry, look, we -- it’s a good start to the year, but we don’t know -- we don’t -- we don’t know what we don’t know. We are cautiously optimistic for the year and I think just one step at a time.

Anything to read on AT&T or is it just not counting the AT&T business at all?

We have not dialed in, Dmitry, much revenue from AT&T, because it’s just a start to the relationship and I think we just want to be cautiously optimistic there. Longer term, I think, AT&T could be emerge as a good long-term macro for us or driver for us given that the previous relationship was a $50 million business for us. But we have not -- in ‘19 we have not dialed in much.

All right. Fine. May I may ask one other question, in your commercial bundle with Zoom in Contact, what percentage of your bookings include kind of the suite of all three products, meaning UCaaS, video and in Contact. And when you do sell the entire bundle, what’s the impact to the gross margins and can you kind of tell us what the gross margin guidance will be, I know you are not guiding it, but can you give us a little calibration of what to look for on the gross margin line for ‘19?

Sure. You are packing like seven questions in one. So that’s -- so congrats on that. So I will try so we don’t -- so unlike some of the other cloud vendors, we don’t sell in Contact or Contact Center along with our Office product, it’s been bought separately. They are two separate bundles. So, but we do integrate at a deep level with these two products. And in terms of gross margins, it’s no secret that the Contact Center margins, I’d call it, plus or minus 50-ish percent range gross margins and so if you blend the two, our gross margins for Office with the Contact Center, I think, I did allude to in the previous calls that the gross margin should be around 82% plus or minus range, which is what you put in your previous. So thanks for being ahead of that.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Schwartz with Oppenheimer. Please proceed with your question.

Yeah. Hi. Thank you very much and congrats on a really nice fiscal year. Most of my questions have been answered today, but I thought maybe I would just ask one granular question for David out there. Just given the strength that you are seeing here now in the big deals in the upsell momentum that you are having in the installed base, I am just curious, if you are starting to face off with different buyer sets within the customer base, if there’s new champions that are emerging for the company. The reason I ask is, we have talked about this before, but one of the opportunities here is to expand the platform into more of an enterprise scale business communications plus an engagement and collaboration platform and I am just kind of curious where you think you are on that journey based on the customers and the buyers that you are speaking to you today? Thanks.

Yeah. So our customers and buyers, we are typically within this often in the CIO organization, we do a little bit with procurement in some of these organizations, but as we have expanded the selling of Contact Center, the customer service line of business becomes important and as we look to sell Engage and Connect -- Engage marketing gets more involved and with Connect First, we see a little more on the sell side. So we are broadening across the different buyers in the organizations and as we talked about, we are working -- we work those purchase decisions across all those buyers and we have had a lot of success selling all of those even upfront in some of the deals is and then other deals will sell one product and then cross-sell overtime into the other products.

Thanks, David.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Latimore with Northland Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Two quick ones here, what percent of your bookings is coming from international and in terms of average revenue per seat, what’s been the trend over the last year there?

Sure. Mike, it’s Mitesh. I will take the second part first. No, no, quite, no change to our pricing, it remains pretty stable. And then in terms of the bookings for international, we don’t specifically break it out. International still remains a small -- smaller piece of the overall pie sub 10%, but the overall bookings growth was faster than the overall growth of the business. So it remains an emerging vector of growth for us.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Mike.

Our next question comes from the line of Matt Van Vliet with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Just curious where you guys stand on some of the vertical selling groups in terms of overall sales productivity. Are they a little bit earlier on the curve since that’s been a little bit more of a recent investment and then how just generally is the headcount additions been specifically in those groups relative to the overall sort of quota carrying headcount?

Yeah. So we have been investing those verticals for a while. So that’s not something that’s new. But because of the success we are having and I mentioned each of those verticals, financial services, healthcare and state, local education had several million dollar wins in the quarter. That’s driving us to increase the size of those teams, but because we are seeing the productivity success from them.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Zack Turcotte with Dougherty & Company. Please proceed with your question.

Hey. Thanks. Zack on for Catharine Trebnick. So with the recent acquisitions to kind of round out your Contact Center and customer engagement platform, do you feel like your product portfolio is kind of complete at this point and from a product and technology perspective, what’s your focus right now, at your user conference last year and other conferences as we have been to recently it seems like there is a large focus on AI and Analytics particularly in relation to Contact Center?

Look, we are always looking for additional technology solutions that can help with the overall portfolio. We believe in bringing a world-class solution to our customers in all areas, so I think there’s still opportunities as we look across the communication suite and we are continuing to look at opportunities. The, probably, the more important thing is as we bring these organizations in is to create that seamless user experience across the products and so that’s a big focus of our innovation is to do that both from a user experience, as well as from a platform HA capability, as we have a very high bar that customers expect from us. And as we bring in new innovative products, we also want them to meet that high bar of expectations. So those were key things that we will be working on to further the strength of the product suite.

Great. Thanks.

Hello?

Hey. Operator, are you there for the next question?

I apologize for the delay. Our next question comes from the line of Jon Kees from Summit Insights Group. Please proceed with your question.

Great. I am here. Thanks for squeezing me in. I will keep mine in one question. As you expand -- as you expand internationally, as you expand into adjacent markets, especially with your expanded portfolio into these adjacent, as well as new markets, can you talk about your -- the efforts that you have to make in branding and brand recognition, especially in 2019 is that something you have to ramp up? Thanks.

Hi. It’s Dave Sipes. The -- we continue to invest in our branding capabilities both through traditional industry events, as well as enterprise field marketing capabilities, as well as some brand that you will see in radio across nationally. And we are focused as we go into additional markets like the UK to make sure we go in with scale and make sure we build a strong reputation within those markets, both with the customers directly and also with the channel as we go-to-market. So those are things that we have continued to do. I would say, at the same kind of proportion that we have done it in the past and so as we grow the overall business we will continue to increase investments by proportionally in those areas.

Great. I will stop there. Keep up the good work. Thanks guys.

Our final question comes from the line of Kash Rangan from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the last question. Congratulations on a spectacular quarter. I find your answers to be very insightful and analytical. I was just wondering, if you see for ever happened to be Wall Street analyst its prior life, of course, that’s not the question, I know the answer to that question. But when you look at these mega deals that are happening for you guys it’s certainly an inflection point, as you approach the $1 billion plus level. Are you seeing more of these mega deals in your pipeline and how to think about the effect on your business either from an expense investment standpoint or from the standpoint of lowering attrition and keep maintaining a growth profile? That’s it from me. Thank you.

So, this is Dave Sipes. We have had this progression as we moved into mid-market had success in mid-market then into smaller enterprise and now as we move into larger, mega enterprise. We are continuing the same playbook to have dedicated selling capabilities in those markets, bring the right mix of post-sell capabilities to the customer through professional services and customer success managers and do that in concert with our channel partners. Si it’s a playbook we have been running in the other segments, we are running at in the large segment, we are happy to be demonstrating success and we see additional opportunities definitely in the pipeline of these coming down. But it’s been a migration as we have done that and we have continued to manage the rest of the business in a disciplined manner as we do advance into the upper ends of the market.

We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session and I will now turn the call back to management for closing remarks.

No. Thank you all for dialing in. We will see you next quarter. Thank you.

This concludes today’s conference and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.